Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-p6nx7 Total loading time: 0.283 Render date: 2022-01-29T08:43:36.596Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - From Utopia to republicanism: the case of Diderot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2010

Biancamaria Fontana
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

‘On retrouve partout la base et les details de son Contrat social’: in 1782 Diderot seemed to subscribe to this judgement, which offers an interesting indication of the spread of republican ideas in the middle of the eighteenth century, but denies Rousseau's masterwork any greatness. Of course, Diderot's view reflects the lively conflict between the two frères ennemis – a conflict that was still stirring Diderot's mind. Already in 1774, Diderot regarded the republican tradition as not very useful, because it was inescapably linked to small societies: these, in the age of great national states, could have only a precarious existence. It seems therefore that we are at the end of the longue durée of the republican theme, so well illustrated by Quentin Skinner. Mine, therefore, is a research about a silence. But in the history of French political thought this silence has perhaps been of no less importance than the inflamed discourse of Rousseau. This silence nurtured inside it the word of truth: ‘il faut qu'elle reste, cette vérité, ou que tout périsse avec elle’. This is the truth of the ideal political society, where happiness, liberty, and virtue reign: it is the truth of the republic. ‘Les vérités enterrées dans les ouvrages des Gordon, des Sydney, des Machiavel, elles en sortent de tous côtés.’ Consequently, it was no longer enough just to meditate upon this truth; it was necessary to think of it within history, even if it was just this difficulty which had wrecked the earlier theories, in particular that of Rousseau.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×