Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-vq995 Total loading time: 0.29 Render date: 2021-10-18T00:53:14.549Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

7 - “Forgery” in the New Testament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Einar Thomassen
Affiliation:
Professor of Religion University of Bergen
James R. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Olav Hammer
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Get access

Summary

Of the twenty-seven writings that were added to the Jewish Scriptures by the Christians in antiquity as a “New Testament,” only seven are unanimously accepted by modern scholars as genuinely carrying the name of their original author. The seven are the following epistles of Paul: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, and Philemon. The authenticity of several texts is disputed (especially Colossians, Ephesians, 2 Thessalonians, and 1 Peter). The rest of the writings contained in the New Testament were in all probability not written by the persons whose alleged authorship of these documents originally justified their inclusion in the canon.

The inauthenticity of these writings is of three different kinds. Some are instances of pseudepigraphy, that is, they were deliberately written under somebody else's name. This is, in the opinion of most scholars, the situation with the “deutero-Pauline” epistles: Colossians, Ephesians, 2 Thessalonians and the Pastoral Epistles. Also, 1 Peter is most likely pseudepigraphal, and 2 Peter certainly is. Other New Testament texts originally circulated anonymously and were only later ascribed to named authors. The four gospels and Acts belong to this category. The anonymous letter to the Hebrews was originally received as canonical on the assumption that it was written by Paul. A similar case is represented by the three letters ascribed to John. Finally, the Revelation of John and the letters of James and Jude may owe their canonical status rather to a mistake of identity: these documents may have been written by authors bearing the same names as the disciple and the two brothers of Jesus and later erroneously attributed to these apostolic figures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auwers, Jean-Marie, and Jonge, Henk Jan (eds.). The Biblical Canons, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 153 (Leuven: Peeters, 2003).Google Scholar
Bainton, Roland H., “The Bible in the Reformation,” in Greenslade, S. L. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the Bible, iii: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Armin Daniel, Pseudepigraphie und literarische Fälschung im frühen Christentum. (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 138) (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).Google Scholar
Brox, Norbert, Falsche Verfasserangaben: Zur Erklärung der frühchristlichen Pseudepigraphie, Stuttgarter Bibelstudien 79 (Stuttgart: KBW Verlag, 1975).Google Scholar
Brox, Norbert (ed.), Pseudepigraphie in der heidnischen und jüdisch-christlichen Antike (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1977).Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F.The Canon of Scripture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Campenhausen, Hans F., Die Entstehung der christlichen Bibel, Beiträge zur historischen Theologie 39 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1968; repr. 2003).Google Scholar
Candlish, J. S.On the Moral Character of Pseudonymous Books,” The Expositor 4/4 (1891), pp. 91–107, 262–79. German trans. in Brox, Pseudepigraphie, pp. 7–42.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kent D., “The Problem of Pseudonymity in Biblical Literature and Its Implications for Canon Formation,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 440–68.
Collins, Adela Yarbro, “Revelation, Book of,” Anchor Bible Dictionary, v, pp. 694–708.
de Jonge, H. J., “The New Testament Canon,” in Auwers, and Jonge, , The Biblical Canons, pp. 309–19.
Ferguson, Everett, “Factors Leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 295–320.
Funk, Robert W., “The Once and Future New Testament,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 541–57.
Gamble, Harry Y., “The New Testament Canon: Recent Research and the Status Questionis,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 267–94.
Hennecke, Edgar, and Wilhelm Schneemelcher, The New Testament Apocrypha, English trans. ed. by Wilson, R. McL., 3rd edn., 2 vols. (Cambridge: James Clarke, 1991–2).Google Scholar
Kalin, Everett R., “The New Testament Canon of Eusebius,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 386–404.
Koester, Helmut, Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development (London: SCM Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Kraft, Robert A., “The Codex and Canon Consciousness,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 229–33.
Leipoldt, Johannes, Geschichte des neutestamentlichen Kanons, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1907–8). Repr. Leipzig: Zentralantiquariat der DDR 1974.Google Scholar
Lønning, Inge, “Kanon im Kanon”: Zum dogmatischen Grundlagenproblem des neutestamentlichen Kanons, Forschungen zur Geschichte und Lehre des Protestantismus 43 (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; Munich: Chr. Kaiser, 1972).Google Scholar
McDonald, Lee M., The Formation of the Christian Biblical Canon, 2nd edn. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1995).Google Scholar
McDonald, Lee M.,“Identifying Scripture and Canon in the Early Church: The Criteria Question,” in McDonald, and Sanders, , The Canon Debate, pp. 416–39.
McDonald, Lee M., and Sanders, James A. (eds.), The Canon Debate (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002).Google Scholar
Meade, David G., Pseudonymity and Canon: An Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 39 (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1986).Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M., The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M., “Literary Forgeries and Canonical Pseudepigrapha,” Journal of Biblical Literature 91 (1972), pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norelli, Enrico, “Le Statut des textes chrétiens de l'oralité à l'écriture et leur rapport avec l'institution au IIe siècle,” in Norelli, E. (ed.), Recueils normatifs et canons dans l'Antiquité: Perspectives nouvelles sur la formation des canons juif et chrétien dans leur contexte culturel (Lausanne: Editions du Zèbre, 2004), pp. 147–94.Google Scholar
Speyer, Wolfgang, “Religiöse Pseudepigraphie und literarische Fälschung im Altertum,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 8/9 (1965/6), pp. 88–125. Repr. in Speyer, Frühes Christentum im antiken Strahlungsfeld, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 50 (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1989), pp. 21–58.
Stanton, Graham N., “Jesus Traditions and Gospels in Justin Martyr and Irenaeus,” in Auwers, and Jonge, , The Biblical Canons, pp. 353–70.
Stendahl, Krister, “The Apocalypse of John and the Epistles of Paul in the Muratorian Fragment,” in Klassen, William and Snyder, Gradon F. (eds.), Current Issues in New Testament Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Otto A. Piper (London: SCM Press, 1962), pp. 239–45.Google Scholar
Verheyden, Joseph, “The Canon Muratori: A Matter of Dispute,” in Auwers, and Jonge, , The Biblical Canons, pp. 487–556.

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×