Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-7j4dq Total loading time: 0.818 Render date: 2022-10-01T06:17:46.599Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2021

Giorgio Pini
Affiliation:
Fordham University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Duns Scotus
Critical Essays
, pp. 246 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Duns Scotus, , John, . Coll. Ox. (Alliney and Fedeli) = Iohannis Duns Scoti Collationes oxonienses. A cura di Guido Alliney e Marina Fedeli. Firenze: SISMEL – Editioni del Galluzzo, 2016.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Coll. Par. 13 = Joannis Duns Scoti Collationes, 13. Opera omnia V, 199204. Paris: L. Vivès, 1891.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . DPP (Kluxen) = Johannes Duns Scotus. Abhandlung über das Erste Prinzip. Herausgegeben und übersetzt von Wolfgang Kluxen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . DPP (Wolter) = John Duns Scotus. A Treatise on God as First Principle. Translated and Edited with Commentary by Wolter, Allan B.. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ioannis Duns Scoti Doctoris Mariani Theologiae Marianae Elementa. Edidit Balić, C.. Sibenik: Ex typographia Kačić, 1933.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Lect. I and II (Vat.) = Ioannis Duns Scoti Lectura in primum et secundum librum Sententiarum. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae. Opera Omnia XVI–XIX. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1960–1993.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Lect. III (Vat.) = Ioannis Duns Scoti Lectura in tertium librum Sententiarum. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae. Opera omnia XX–XXI. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 2003–2004.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ord. I–IV, d. 49, p. 2, q.un. (Vat.) = Ioannis Duns Scoti Ordinatio. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae. Opera omnia I–XIV. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1950–2013.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ord. IV (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones in quartum librum Sententiarum a distinctione quadragesima nona usque ad quinquagesimam. Opera omnia XXI. Paris: Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ord. IV (Wad.) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones in quartum librum Sententiarum. Opera omnia X. Lugduni: sumptibus Laurentii Durand, 1639.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QDA (OPh V) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima. Ediderunt Bazán, C., Emery, K., Green, R., Noone, T., Plevano, R., and Traver, A.. Opera Philosophica V. Washington, DC and St. Bonaventure, NY: The Catholic University of America Press and The Franciscan Institute, 2006.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QMet. (OPh III and IV) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis. Libri I–V and Libri VI–IX. Edited by Andrews, R., Etzkorn, G., Gál, G., Green, R., †Kelley, F., †Marcil, G., Noone, T., and Wood, R.. Opera Philosophica III and IV. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure University, 1997.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QPraed. (OPh I) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super Praedicamenta Aristotelis. Edited by Andrews, R., Etzkorn, G., †Gál, G., Green, R., Noone, T., and Wood, R.. Opera Philosophica I, 247566. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QSE (OPh II) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum Aristotelis. Ediderunt Andrews, R., Bychkov, O., Ebbesen, S., Etzkorn, G., †Gál, G., Green, R., Noone, T., Plevano, R., and Traver, A.. Opera Philosophica II, 255566. St. Bonaventure, NY and Washington, DC: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure University and The Catholic University of America, 2004.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Quodl. (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones quodlibetales. Opera omnia XXV and XXVI. Paris: L. Vivès, 1895.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Quodl. (Wad.) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones quodlibetales. Opera omnia XII. Lugduni: sumptibus Laurentii Durand, 1639.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Quodl., q. 16 (Noone and Roberts) = T.B. Noone and H.F. Roberts. “John Duns Scotus’ Quodlibet: A Brief Study of the Manuscripts and an Edition of Question 16.” In Schabel, C., ed., Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Fourteenth Century, 131198. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. I-A (Wolter and Bychkov) = John Duns Scotus. The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture. Reportatio I-A. Latin Text and English Translation by A.B. Wolter and O.V. Bychkov. 2 vols. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2004 and 2008.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. I-A, d. 39 (Söder) = J. Söder. Kontingenz und Wissen: Die Lehre von den futura contingentia bei Johannes Duns Scotus. Münster: Aschendorff, 1999.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. II-A (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Reportata parisiensia. Liber secundus. Opera omnia XXII, 488677; XXIII, 1233. Paris: L. Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. IV-A, dd. 1–17 (Bychkov and Pomplun) = John Duns Scotus. The Report of the Paris Lecture. Reportatio IV-A. Latin Text and English Translation by O.V. Bychkov and R.T. Pomplun. Parts 1 and 2. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2016.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. IV-A, dd. 18–50 (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Reportata parisiensia. Liber quartus a distinctione septima usque ad quadragesimam nonam. Opera omnia XXIV, 290688. Paris: L. Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
English translationsGoogle Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . On Being and Cognition: Ordinatio I.3. Translated by van den Bercken, John. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, . God and Creatures (Wolter and Alluntis) = John Duns Scotus. God and Creatures: The Quodlibetal Questions. Translated by Felix Alluntis and Allan B. Wolter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
John, . Philosophical Writings. Translated by Wolter, S.B.. Edinburgh: Nelson, 1962.Google Scholar
John, . Philosophical Writings. Translated by Wolter, A.B.. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Albert the Great. In II Sent. (Borgnet) = B. Alberti Magni Commentarii in II Sententiarum. In B. Alberti Magni Opera Omnia. Cura ac labore Augusti Borgnet. Vol. XXVII. Paris: L. Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Anselm. De libertate arbitrii (Schmitt) = Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi De libertate arbitrii. In Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia. Vol. I, 201226. Edidit Schmitt, F.S.. Edinburgh: Apud Thomam Nelson et filios, 1946.Google Scholar
Anselm. Monologion (Schmitt) = Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Monologion. In Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia. Vol. I, 187. Edidit Schmitt, F.S.. Edinburgh: Apud Thomam Nelson et filios, 1946.Google Scholar
Aristotle. APo. = Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora. In Aristotelis Analytica Priora et Posteriora, 114183. Recensuit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Cat. = Aristotelis Categoriae. In Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, 345 Recognovit brevique adnotatione instruxit L. Minio-Paluello. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Met. = Aristotelis Metaphysica. Recognovit brevique admotatione critica instruxit Jaeger, W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Phys. = Aristotle’s Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by Sir David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Top. = Aristotelis Topica. Edidit Ross, D.W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gonteri, Aufredus. Lect. I (Smith) = Aufredi Gonteri Compilatio lecturae primi Sententiarum, d. 3, qq. 2–4. Edited by Smith, G.R.. In Smith 2018.Google Scholar
Gonteri, Aufredus. Ord. = Aufredi Gonteri Britonis In I et II libros Sententiarum. Wroclaw, Biblioteka uniwersytecka, ms. I F 184 (also known as A 211).Google Scholar
Averroes. In Met. (Iunt.) = Averroes. In Metaphysicam. In Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentaria, 10 vols. Venetiis: apud Iunctas, 1562–1574, Vol. VIII.Google Scholar
Boethius. In Cat. (PL LXIV) = Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii in Categorias Aristotelis libri quatuor. In Patrologia Latina. Edidit Migne, J.–P.. Tom. LXIV. Paris: apud Garnier fratres, 1947; reprint Turnhout: Brepols, 1979.Google Scholar
Bonaventure. In II Sent. = S. Bonaventurae Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi. Tom. II. In secundum librum Sententiarum. In Doctoris Seraphici S. Bonaventurae Opera Omnia. Studio et Cura PP. Collegii S. Bonaventurae. Ad Claras Aquas, 1885.Google Scholar
Burley, Adam and Burley, Walter. Questions on the De Anima of Aristotle. Edited by Synan, Edward A.. Studien und Texte Zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, Bd. 55. Leiden and New York: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
de Mayronis, Franciscus. In Sent. I (redactio ‘ab oriente’) = Francisci de Mayronis Opus super primo libro Sententiarum. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Vat. lat. 896, ff. 1r–132v.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes Metaphysicae (Berton). In Francisci Suarez Opera Omnia. Vol. XXV–XXVI. Edidit Berton, C.. Paris: Vivès, 1861; reprint Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome. In II Sent. (Ziletti) = Aegidii Romani in Secundum Librum Sententiarum Quaestiones. Venetiis: ex officina I. Ziletti, 1581.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines. Quodl. III (de Wulf and Pelzer) = Gaudefridi de Fontibus Quodlibet III. In Le quatre premiers Quodlibets de Godefroid de Fontaines (texte inédit), 156–228. Edité par de Wulf, M. et Pelzer, A.. Louvain/Paris: Institut supérieur de Philosophie de l’Université/A. Picard & Fils, 1904.Google Scholar
Hispanus, Gonsalvus. Quaestiones disputatae et de Quodlibet. Bibliotheca Franciscana scholastica Medii Aevi 9. Ad Claras Aquas, Florentiae: ex typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1935.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodl. IX (Opera omnia XII) = Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet IX. Edidit Macken, R.. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XIII. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodl. XII (Opera omnia XVI) = Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet XII quaestiones 1–30. Edidit Decorte, J.. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XVI. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodl. XIII (Opera omnia XVIII) = Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet XIII. Edidit Decorte, J.. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XVIII. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summa quaest. ord. (Badius) = Summae Quaestionum Ordinariarum Theologi recepto praeconio Solemnis Henrici a Gandavo. Paris: in aedibus Iadoci Badii Ascensii, 1520; reprint St. Bonaventure, NY/Louvain/Paderborn: The Franciscan Institute/E. Nauwelaerts/F. Schöningh, 1953.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summa quaest. ord., art. 41–46 (Opera omnia XXIX) = Henrici de Gandavo Summa (Quaestiones ordinariae), art. XLI–XLVI. Edidit Hödl., L. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XXIX. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summa quaest. ord., art. 47–52 (Opera omnia XXX) = Henrici de Gandavo Summa (Quaestiones Ordinariae). In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XXX. Edidit Führer., M. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Liber de causis (Pattin) = A. Pattin. “Le Liber de Causis. Edition établie à l’aide de 90 manuscrits avec introduction et notes.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28 (1966): 90203.Google Scholar
Molina. Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia = Ludovici Molinae Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia. Edidit Rabeneck, Johann, S.J. Oniae/Madrid: Collegium Maximum, 1953.Google Scholar
Olivi. In II Sent. (Jansen) = Fr. Petrus Iohannis Olivi. Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum. Edidit Jansen, B.. 3 vols. Ad Claras Aquas: ex Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 19221926.Google Scholar
Peter of Auvergne. QMet. (Monahan) = A. Monahan. “Quaestiones in Metaphysicam Petri de Alvernia.” In O’Donnell, J.R., ed. Nine Mediaeval Thinkers: A Collection of Hitherto Unedited Texts, 145181. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1955.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sent. = Magistri Petri Lombardi Sententias in IV libri distinctas. 2 vols. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonavenuturae ad Claras Aquas, 1971 et 1981.Google Scholar
de Navarra, Petrus. In I Sent. (Sagües Azcona) = Petrus de Atarrabia sive de Navarra. In Primum Sententiarum Scriptum. 2 vols. Edidit Pius Sagües Azcona. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1974.Google Scholar
Thomae, Petrus. Quaest. de ente (Smith)= Petri Thomae Quaestiones de ente. Edited by Smith, G.R. (Petri Thomae Opera II). Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Thomae, Petrus. Rep. = Petri Thomae Scriptum super primum Sententiarum. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Vat. lat. 1106, ff. 1r–328v.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor. Summa de bono (Wicki) = Philippi Cancellarii Parisiensis Summa de Bono. Edidit Wicki, N.. Berne: Francke, 1985.Google Scholar
Middleton, Richard. In Sent. (Venetiis) = Richardi de Mediavilla Commentaria super libros Sententiarum. In Richardi de Mediavilla Quodlibeta et Commentaria super libros I and II Sententiarum. 4 vols. Venetiis 1507–1509.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger. Compendium of the Study of Philosophy. Edited by Maloney, Thomas S.. Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi 32. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De Pot. (Pession) = S. Thomas Aquinatis Quaestiones disputatae. 2 vols. Vol. II, pp. 7–276: De Potentia. Cura et studio P.M. Pession. Turin: Marrietti, 1965.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In Met. (Cathala and Spiazzi) = S. Thomae Aquinatis in duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Ediderunt M.-R. Cathala et R.M. Spiazzi. Taurini et Romae: Marietti, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In I Sent. (Mandonnet) = Thomas de Aquino. Scriptum super primum librum Sententiarum. 2 vols. Edidit P. Mandonnet. Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1929.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In IV Sent., dd. 23–49 (Parma) = Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Commentum in quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Vol. 2. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Ordinis Praedicatorum Opera Omnia. T. VII. Parmae: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1857.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaest. de quolibet (Leon.) = Sancti Thomae de Aquino Quaestiones de quolibet. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia. Tom. XXV.1–2. Romae: Commissio Leonina; Paris: Les éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra gentiles (Leon.) = Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Summa contra Gentiles. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia. Tom. XIII–XV. Romae: Typis Riccardi Garroni, 1918–1930.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae (Leon.) = Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Summa Theologiae. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum (Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia. Tom. IV–XII). Romae: Typis Riccardi Garroni, 1888–1912.Google Scholar
Wylton, Thomas. Quaest. super Phys. I, q. 13 (Schmaus) = Thomas Wylton. Quaestiones super Physicam I, q. 13. In M. Schmaus. Thomas Wylton als Verfasser eines Kommentars zur Aristotelischen Physik, 12–33. München: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften 1957.Google Scholar
Alnwick, William. Determinationes = Guillelmi Alnwick Determinationes. Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Pal. Lat. 1805, ff. 1193.Google Scholar
Alnwick, William. Quaest. disp. de esse intelligibili et de Quodl. (Ledoux) = Fr. Guillelmi Alnwick, O.F.M. Quaestiones disputatae de esse intelligibili et de Quodlibet. Cura P. Athanasii Ledoux, O.F.M. Firenze: Ex Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1937.Google Scholar
Chatton, Walter. Lect. I (Wey and Etzkorn) = Walter Chatton. Lectura super Sententias: Liber I, Distinctiones 3–7. Edited by Wey, J.C. and Etzkorn, G.J.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
William of Rubio. In Sent. (Badius) = Guillelmi de Rubione in quatuor libros Magistri Sententiarum. Tom. I. Paris: Badius, 1518.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Duns Scotus, , John, . Coll. Ox. (Alliney and Fedeli) = Iohannis Duns Scoti Collationes oxonienses. A cura di Guido Alliney e Marina Fedeli. Firenze: SISMEL – Editioni del Galluzzo, 2016.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Coll. Par. 13 = Joannis Duns Scoti Collationes, 13. Opera omnia V, 199204. Paris: L. Vivès, 1891.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . DPP (Kluxen) = Johannes Duns Scotus. Abhandlung über das Erste Prinzip. Herausgegeben und übersetzt von Wolfgang Kluxen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . DPP (Wolter) = John Duns Scotus. A Treatise on God as First Principle. Translated and Edited with Commentary by Wolter, Allan B.. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ioannis Duns Scoti Doctoris Mariani Theologiae Marianae Elementa. Edidit Balić, C.. Sibenik: Ex typographia Kačić, 1933.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Lect. I and II (Vat.) = Ioannis Duns Scoti Lectura in primum et secundum librum Sententiarum. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae. Opera Omnia XVI–XIX. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1960–1993.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Lect. III (Vat.) = Ioannis Duns Scoti Lectura in tertium librum Sententiarum. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae. Opera omnia XX–XXI. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 2003–2004.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ord. I–IV, d. 49, p. 2, q.un. (Vat.) = Ioannis Duns Scoti Ordinatio. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae. Opera omnia I–XIV. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1950–2013.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ord. IV (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones in quartum librum Sententiarum a distinctione quadragesima nona usque ad quinquagesimam. Opera omnia XXI. Paris: Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Ord. IV (Wad.) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones in quartum librum Sententiarum. Opera omnia X. Lugduni: sumptibus Laurentii Durand, 1639.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QDA (OPh V) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima. Ediderunt Bazán, C., Emery, K., Green, R., Noone, T., Plevano, R., and Traver, A.. Opera Philosophica V. Washington, DC and St. Bonaventure, NY: The Catholic University of America Press and The Franciscan Institute, 2006.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QMet. (OPh III and IV) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis. Libri I–V and Libri VI–IX. Edited by Andrews, R., Etzkorn, G., Gál, G., Green, R., †Kelley, F., †Marcil, G., Noone, T., and Wood, R.. Opera Philosophica III and IV. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure University, 1997.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QPraed. (OPh I) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super Praedicamenta Aristotelis. Edited by Andrews, R., Etzkorn, G., †Gál, G., Green, R., Noone, T., and Wood, R.. Opera Philosophica I, 247566. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . QSE (OPh II) = B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum Aristotelis. Ediderunt Andrews, R., Bychkov, O., Ebbesen, S., Etzkorn, G., †Gál, G., Green, R., Noone, T., Plevano, R., and Traver, A.. Opera Philosophica II, 255566. St. Bonaventure, NY and Washington, DC: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure University and The Catholic University of America, 2004.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Quodl. (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones quodlibetales. Opera omnia XXV and XXVI. Paris: L. Vivès, 1895.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Quodl. (Wad.) = Joannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones quodlibetales. Opera omnia XII. Lugduni: sumptibus Laurentii Durand, 1639.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Quodl., q. 16 (Noone and Roberts) = T.B. Noone and H.F. Roberts. “John Duns Scotus’ Quodlibet: A Brief Study of the Manuscripts and an Edition of Question 16.” In Schabel, C., ed., Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Fourteenth Century, 131198. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. I-A (Wolter and Bychkov) = John Duns Scotus. The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture. Reportatio I-A. Latin Text and English Translation by A.B. Wolter and O.V. Bychkov. 2 vols. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2004 and 2008.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. I-A, d. 39 (Söder) = J. Söder. Kontingenz und Wissen: Die Lehre von den futura contingentia bei Johannes Duns Scotus. Münster: Aschendorff, 1999.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. II-A (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Reportata parisiensia. Liber secundus. Opera omnia XXII, 488677; XXIII, 1233. Paris: L. Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. IV-A, dd. 1–17 (Bychkov and Pomplun) = John Duns Scotus. The Report of the Paris Lecture. Reportatio IV-A. Latin Text and English Translation by O.V. Bychkov and R.T. Pomplun. Parts 1 and 2. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2016.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . Rep. IV-A, dd. 18–50 (Vivès) = Joannis Duns Scoti Reportata parisiensia. Liber quartus a distinctione septima usque ad quadragesimam nonam. Opera omnia XXIV, 290688. Paris: L. Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
English translationsGoogle Scholar
Duns Scotus, , John, . On Being and Cognition: Ordinatio I.3. Translated by van den Bercken, John. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, . God and Creatures (Wolter and Alluntis) = John Duns Scotus. God and Creatures: The Quodlibetal Questions. Translated by Felix Alluntis and Allan B. Wolter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
John, . Philosophical Writings. Translated by Wolter, S.B.. Edinburgh: Nelson, 1962.Google Scholar
John, . Philosophical Writings. Translated by Wolter, A.B.. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Albert the Great. In II Sent. (Borgnet) = B. Alberti Magni Commentarii in II Sententiarum. In B. Alberti Magni Opera Omnia. Cura ac labore Augusti Borgnet. Vol. XXVII. Paris: L. Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Anselm. De libertate arbitrii (Schmitt) = Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi De libertate arbitrii. In Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia. Vol. I, 201226. Edidit Schmitt, F.S.. Edinburgh: Apud Thomam Nelson et filios, 1946.Google Scholar
Anselm. Monologion (Schmitt) = Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Monologion. In Sancti Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia. Vol. I, 187. Edidit Schmitt, F.S.. Edinburgh: Apud Thomam Nelson et filios, 1946.Google Scholar
Aristotle. APo. = Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora. In Aristotelis Analytica Priora et Posteriora, 114183. Recensuit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Cat. = Aristotelis Categoriae. In Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, 345 Recognovit brevique adnotatione instruxit L. Minio-Paluello. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Met. = Aristotelis Metaphysica. Recognovit brevique admotatione critica instruxit Jaeger, W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Phys. = Aristotle’s Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by Sir David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Top. = Aristotelis Topica. Edidit Ross, D.W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gonteri, Aufredus. Lect. I (Smith) = Aufredi Gonteri Compilatio lecturae primi Sententiarum, d. 3, qq. 2–4. Edited by Smith, G.R.. In Smith 2018.Google Scholar
Gonteri, Aufredus. Ord. = Aufredi Gonteri Britonis In I et II libros Sententiarum. Wroclaw, Biblioteka uniwersytecka, ms. I F 184 (also known as A 211).Google Scholar
Averroes. In Met. (Iunt.) = Averroes. In Metaphysicam. In Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentaria, 10 vols. Venetiis: apud Iunctas, 1562–1574, Vol. VIII.Google Scholar
Boethius. In Cat. (PL LXIV) = Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii in Categorias Aristotelis libri quatuor. In Patrologia Latina. Edidit Migne, J.–P.. Tom. LXIV. Paris: apud Garnier fratres, 1947; reprint Turnhout: Brepols, 1979.Google Scholar
Bonaventure. In II Sent. = S. Bonaventurae Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi. Tom. II. In secundum librum Sententiarum. In Doctoris Seraphici S. Bonaventurae Opera Omnia. Studio et Cura PP. Collegii S. Bonaventurae. Ad Claras Aquas, 1885.Google Scholar
Burley, Adam and Burley, Walter. Questions on the De Anima of Aristotle. Edited by Synan, Edward A.. Studien und Texte Zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, Bd. 55. Leiden and New York: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
de Mayronis, Franciscus. In Sent. I (redactio ‘ab oriente’) = Francisci de Mayronis Opus super primo libro Sententiarum. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Vat. lat. 896, ff. 1r–132v.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes Metaphysicae (Berton). In Francisci Suarez Opera Omnia. Vol. XXV–XXVI. Edidit Berton, C.. Paris: Vivès, 1861; reprint Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome. In II Sent. (Ziletti) = Aegidii Romani in Secundum Librum Sententiarum Quaestiones. Venetiis: ex officina I. Ziletti, 1581.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines. Quodl. III (de Wulf and Pelzer) = Gaudefridi de Fontibus Quodlibet III. In Le quatre premiers Quodlibets de Godefroid de Fontaines (texte inédit), 156–228. Edité par de Wulf, M. et Pelzer, A.. Louvain/Paris: Institut supérieur de Philosophie de l’Université/A. Picard & Fils, 1904.Google Scholar
Hispanus, Gonsalvus. Quaestiones disputatae et de Quodlibet. Bibliotheca Franciscana scholastica Medii Aevi 9. Ad Claras Aquas, Florentiae: ex typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1935.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodl. IX (Opera omnia XII) = Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet IX. Edidit Macken, R.. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XIII. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodl. XII (Opera omnia XVI) = Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet XII quaestiones 1–30. Edidit Decorte, J.. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XVI. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodl. XIII (Opera omnia XVIII) = Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet XIII. Edidit Decorte, J.. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XVIII. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summa quaest. ord. (Badius) = Summae Quaestionum Ordinariarum Theologi recepto praeconio Solemnis Henrici a Gandavo. Paris: in aedibus Iadoci Badii Ascensii, 1520; reprint St. Bonaventure, NY/Louvain/Paderborn: The Franciscan Institute/E. Nauwelaerts/F. Schöningh, 1953.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summa quaest. ord., art. 41–46 (Opera omnia XXIX) = Henrici de Gandavo Summa (Quaestiones ordinariae), art. XLI–XLVI. Edidit Hödl., L. In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XXIX. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summa quaest. ord., art. 47–52 (Opera omnia XXX) = Henrici de Gandavo Summa (Quaestiones Ordinariae). In Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia XXX. Edidit Führer., M. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Liber de causis (Pattin) = A. Pattin. “Le Liber de Causis. Edition établie à l’aide de 90 manuscrits avec introduction et notes.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28 (1966): 90203.Google Scholar
Molina. Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia = Ludovici Molinae Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Divina Praescientia, Providentia, Praedestinatione et Reprobatione Concordia. Edidit Rabeneck, Johann, S.J. Oniae/Madrid: Collegium Maximum, 1953.Google Scholar
Olivi. In II Sent. (Jansen) = Fr. Petrus Iohannis Olivi. Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum. Edidit Jansen, B.. 3 vols. Ad Claras Aquas: ex Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 19221926.Google Scholar
Peter of Auvergne. QMet. (Monahan) = A. Monahan. “Quaestiones in Metaphysicam Petri de Alvernia.” In O’Donnell, J.R., ed. Nine Mediaeval Thinkers: A Collection of Hitherto Unedited Texts, 145181. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1955.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sent. = Magistri Petri Lombardi Sententias in IV libri distinctas. 2 vols. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonavenuturae ad Claras Aquas, 1971 et 1981.Google Scholar
de Navarra, Petrus. In I Sent. (Sagües Azcona) = Petrus de Atarrabia sive de Navarra. In Primum Sententiarum Scriptum. 2 vols. Edidit Pius Sagües Azcona. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1974.Google Scholar
Thomae, Petrus. Quaest. de ente (Smith)= Petri Thomae Quaestiones de ente. Edited by Smith, G.R. (Petri Thomae Opera II). Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Thomae, Petrus. Rep. = Petri Thomae Scriptum super primum Sententiarum. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Vat. lat. 1106, ff. 1r–328v.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor. Summa de bono (Wicki) = Philippi Cancellarii Parisiensis Summa de Bono. Edidit Wicki, N.. Berne: Francke, 1985.Google Scholar
Middleton, Richard. In Sent. (Venetiis) = Richardi de Mediavilla Commentaria super libros Sententiarum. In Richardi de Mediavilla Quodlibeta et Commentaria super libros I and II Sententiarum. 4 vols. Venetiis 1507–1509.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger. Compendium of the Study of Philosophy. Edited by Maloney, Thomas S.. Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi 32. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De Pot. (Pession) = S. Thomas Aquinatis Quaestiones disputatae. 2 vols. Vol. II, pp. 7–276: De Potentia. Cura et studio P.M. Pession. Turin: Marrietti, 1965.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In Met. (Cathala and Spiazzi) = S. Thomae Aquinatis in duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Ediderunt M.-R. Cathala et R.M. Spiazzi. Taurini et Romae: Marietti, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In I Sent. (Mandonnet) = Thomas de Aquino. Scriptum super primum librum Sententiarum. 2 vols. Edidit P. Mandonnet. Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1929.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In IV Sent., dd. 23–49 (Parma) = Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Commentum in quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Vol. 2. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Ordinis Praedicatorum Opera Omnia. T. VII. Parmae: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1857.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaest. de quolibet (Leon.) = Sancti Thomae de Aquino Quaestiones de quolibet. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia. Tom. XXV.1–2. Romae: Commissio Leonina; Paris: Les éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra gentiles (Leon.) = Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Summa contra Gentiles. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia. Tom. XIII–XV. Romae: Typis Riccardi Garroni, 1918–1930.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae (Leon.) = Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Summa Theologiae. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum (Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia. Tom. IV–XII). Romae: Typis Riccardi Garroni, 1888–1912.Google Scholar
Wylton, Thomas. Quaest. super Phys. I, q. 13 (Schmaus) = Thomas Wylton. Quaestiones super Physicam I, q. 13. In M. Schmaus. Thomas Wylton als Verfasser eines Kommentars zur Aristotelischen Physik, 12–33. München: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften 1957.Google Scholar
Alnwick, William. Determinationes = Guillelmi Alnwick Determinationes. Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Pal. Lat. 1805, ff. 1193.Google Scholar
Alnwick, William. Quaest. disp. de esse intelligibili et de Quodl. (Ledoux) = Fr. Guillelmi Alnwick, O.F.M. Quaestiones disputatae de esse intelligibili et de Quodlibet. Cura P. Athanasii Ledoux, O.F.M. Firenze: Ex Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1937.Google Scholar
Chatton, Walter. Lect. I (Wey and Etzkorn) = Walter Chatton. Lectura super Sententias: Liber I, Distinctiones 3–7. Edited by Wey, J.C. and Etzkorn, G.J.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
William of Rubio. In Sent. (Badius) = Guillelmi de Rubione in quatuor libros Magistri Sententiarum. Tom. I. Paris: Badius, 1518.Google Scholar
Adams, M. McCord. 2010. “Essential Orders and Sacramental Causality.” In Ingham, M.B. and Bychkov, O., eds. John Duns Scotus, Philosopher: Proceedings of the “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, 191206. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar
Aertsen, J.A. 2005a. “Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79: 411430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aertsen, J.A.. 2005b. “Hoe kan een theoloog en filosoof zo iets leren? Duns Scotus’ kritiek op Thomas van Aquino.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 67: 453478.Google Scholar
Aertsen, J.A.. 2012. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancelor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alliney, G. 2005. “La ricezione della teoria scotiana della volontà nell’ambiente teologico parigino (1307–1316).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 16: 339404.Google Scholar
Alliney, G.. 2008. “Utrum necesse sit voluntatem frui: Note sul volontarismo francescano inglese del primo Trecento.” Quaestio 8: 83138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alliney, G.. 2013. “Giovanni di Morrovalle e le Affectiones Anselmiane.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 106: 569–84.Google Scholar
Anstey, H., ed. 1868. Munimenta academica; or, Documents Illustrative of Academic Life and Studies at Oxford. 2 vols. (Rerum Britannicarum medii aevi scriptores 50). London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
Ariew, R. 2000. “Scotists, Scotists, Everywhere.” Intellectual News 8: 1421.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. 1980. “‘Can I Speak More Clearly than I Understand?’ A Problem of Religious Language in Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and Ockham.” Historiographia Linguistica 7: 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J.. 1991. “Signification and Modes of Signifying in Thirteenth-Century Logic: A Preface to Aquinas on Analogy.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1: 3967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J.. 1992. “Analogy and Equivocation in Thirteenth-Century Logic: Aquinas in Context.” Mediaeval Studies 54: 94135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J.. 2007. “Metaphor and the Logicians from Aristotle to Cajetan.” Vivarium 45: 311327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J.. 2008. Les théories de l’analogie du XIIe au XVIe siècle. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J.. 2013. “Analogy and Metaphor from Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus and Walter Burley.” In Bolyard, C. and Keele, R., eds. Later Medieval Metaphysics: Ontology, Language, and Logic, 223–48. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. 1989. “Sur la naissance de la doctrine pseudo-aristotélicienne de l’analogie de l’être.” Les études philosophiques 3/4: 291304.Google Scholar
Balić, C. 1927. Les commentaires de Jean Duns Scot sur les quatre livres des Sentences: étude historique et critique. Louvain: Bureaux de la Revue.Google Scholar
Balić, C.. 1959. “Henricus de Harcley et Ioannes Duns Scotus.” In Mélanges offerts à Étienne Gilson, de l’Académie française, 93121. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Balić, C.. 1965. “The Life and Works of John Duns Scotus.” In Ryan, J.K. and Bonansea, B.M., eds. John Duns Scotus 1265–1965, 127. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Bazán, B.C. 1985. “Les questions disputées, principalement dans les facultés de théologie.” In Les questions disputées et les questions quodlibétiques dans les facultés de théologie, de droit et de médecine, 15152. Typologie des sources du Moyen Age occidental; fasc. 44–45. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Google Scholar
Bazán, B.C.. 2001. “Conceptions of the Agent Intellect and the Limits of Metaphysics.” In Aertsen, J.A. et al., eds. Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts: Studien und Texte, 178210. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bérubé, C. 1983. “Jean Duns Scot, critique de l’«Avicennisme augustinisant» sur l’objet de l’intelligence.” In Bérubé, C.. De l’homme à Dieu selon Duns Scot, Henri de Gand et Olivi, 113146. Roma: Collegio S. Lorenzo.Google Scholar
Betz, J. 2019. “The Analogia entis as a Standard of Catholic Engagement: Erich Przywara’s Critique of Phenomenology and Dialectical Theology.” Modern Theology 35: 81102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boler, J. 1990. “The Moral Psychology of Duns Scotus: Some Preliminary Questions.” Franciscan Studies 50: 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boler, J.. 1993. “Transcending the Natural: Duns Scotus on the Two Affections of the Will.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67: 109126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boler, J.. 1996. “The Ontological Commitment of Scotus’s Account of Potency in his Questions on the Metaphysics, Book IX.” In Honnefelder, Wood, and Dreyer 1996, 145160.Google Scholar
Bonansea, B.M. 1983. Man and His Approach to God in John Duns Scotus. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Borland, T. and Hillman, A.T.. 2017. “Scotus and God’s Arbitrary Will: A Reassessment.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91: 399429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulnois, O. 1995. “Représentation et noms divins selon Duns Scot.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 6: 255–80.Google Scholar
Boulnois, O.. 1998. Duns Scot: La rigueur de la charité. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Boulnois, O.. 1999. Être et représentation. Une généalogie de la métaphysique moderne à l’époque de Duns Scotus (XIIe–XIVe siècle). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Boulnois, O.. 2011. “Libertas indifferentiae. Figures de la liberté d’indifférence au moyen âge.” In Atucha, I. et al., eds. Mots médiévaux offerts à Ruedi Imbach, 405417. Porto: FIDEM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulnois, O.. 2014. “‘In Harmony with Reason’: John Duns Scotus’s Theo-aesth/ethics.” Open Theology 1: 4555.Google Scholar
Brampton, C.K. 1964. “Duns Scotus at Oxford, 1288–1301.” Franciscan Studies 24: 520.Google Scholar
Bryce, W.M. 1909. The Scottish Grey Friars. Edinburgh and London: W. Green and Sons.Google Scholar
Callebaut, A. 1924. “Le B. Jean Duns Scot étudiant à Paris vers 1293–1296.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 17: 312.Google Scholar
Callebaut, A.. 1928. “Le Bx. Jean Duns Scot à Cambridge vers 1297–1300.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 21 (4): 608611.Google Scholar
Callebaut, A.. 1929. “Les séjours à Paris Du B. J. Duns Scot: son milieu universitaire.” La France Franciscaine 12: 353–73.Google Scholar
Callebaut, A.. 1931. “A propos du Bx. Jean Duns Scot de Littledean. Notes et recherches historiques de 1265 à 1292.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 24: 305329.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, P. 1931. “Le dispute Quodlibetali di Pietro de Anglia, O. F. M.” Divus Thomas 34: 413–19.Google Scholar
Cenci, C., and Mailleux, G., eds. 2007. Constitutiones generales Ordinis Fratrum Minorum I (Saeculum XIII). Analecta Franciscana 13. Grottaferrata (Roma): Frati editori di Quaracchi.Google Scholar
Cenci, C., and Mailleux, G., eds. 2010. Constitutiones generales Ordinis Fratrum Minorum II (Saeculum XIV/1). Analecta Franciscana 17. Grottaferrata (Roma): Frati editori di Quaracchi.Google Scholar
Cheney, C.R. and Jones, M.. 2000. A Handbook of Dates for Students of British History. New edition revised by Jones, Michael. Guides and Handbooks 4. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W.J. 1978. Adam Wodeham: An Introduction to His Life and Writings. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 1980. “The Lost Matthew Commentary of Robert Holcot.” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 50: 103–12.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 1987. Schools & Scholars in Fourteenth-Century England. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 1993. “The Parisian Franciscan Community in 1303.” Franciscan Studies 53: 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 1995. “Scotus at Paris.” In Sileo 1995, Vol. 1, 149–163.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 1996. “Between Pope and King: The Parisian Letters of Adhesion of 1303.” Speculum 71: 577605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 1999. “Instructional Programme of the Mendicant Convents at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century.” In Biller, P. and Dobson, R.B., eds. The Medieval Church: Universities, Heresy, and the Religious Life: Essays in Honour of Gordon Leff, 77–92. Studies in Church History. Subsidia 11. Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK and Rochester, NY: Published for the Ecclesiastical History Society by the Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 2011. “Early Scotists at Paris: A Reconsideration.” Franciscan Studies 69: 175229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 2012. “Scotus at Paris: Some Reconsiderations.” In Cross, R., ed. The Opera Theologica of John Duns Scotus. Proceedings of The Quadruple Congress on John Duns Scotus Part 2, 1–19. Archa Verbi Subsidia 4. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W.J.. 2016. “Magisterial Authority, Philosophical Identity, and the Growth of Marian Devotion: The Seals of Parisian Masters, 1190–1308.” Speculum 91: 63114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R. 1998. The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R.. 1999. Duns Scotus. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, R.. 2005. Duns Scotus on God. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cross, R.. 2012a. “Duns Scotus and Analogy: A Brief Note.” The Modern Schoolman 89: 147154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R.. 2012b. “Natural Law, Moral Constructivism, and Duns Scotus’s Metaethics: The Centrality of Aesthetic Explanation.” In Jacobs, J.A., ed. Reason, Religion, and Natural Law: From Plato to Spinoza, 175197. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R.. 2013. “Duns Scotus on Essence and Existence.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 1: 174202.Google Scholar
Cross, R.. 2014. Duns Scotus’s Theory of Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R.. 2015. “Duns Scotus and Divine Necessity.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3: 128144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Libera, A. 1989. “Les sources gréco-arabes de la théorie médiévale de l’analogie de l’être.” Les études philosophiques 3/4: 319345.Google Scholar
Dekker, E. 1998. “Does Scotus Need Molina? On Divine Foreknowledge and Co-Causality.” In Bos, E.P., ed. John Duns Scotus Renewal of Philosophy, 101111. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Demange, D. 2007. Jean Duns Scot: La théorie du savoir. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Denifle, H. and Chatelain, E.. 1889. Chartularium Universitatis parisiensis. 4 vols. Paris: Ex typis fratrum Delalain.Google Scholar
Docherty, H. 1968. “The Brockie Mss. and Duns Scotus.” In De Doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti, Vol. 1, 327360. Rome: Societas Internationalis Scotistica.Google Scholar
Donati, S. 2003. “La discussione sull’unità del concetto di ente nella tradizione di commento della ‘Fisica’: commenti parigini degli anni 1270–1315 ca.” In Pickavé, M., ed. Die Logik des Transzendentalen. Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburtstag, 60–139. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 30. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar
Donati, S.. 2012. “La doctrine de l’analogie de l’être dans la tradition des commentaires de la Physique. Quelques modèles interprétatifs (commentaires de la Faculté des arts, autour de 1250–1300.” Revue Thomiste 112: 3159.Google Scholar
Donati, S.. 2013. “Apparentia and modi essendi in Radulphus Brito’s Doctrine of the Concepts: The Concept of Being.” In Leth Fink, J., Hansen, H., and Mora-Marquez, A.M., eds. Logic and Language in the Middle Ages: Studies in Honour of Sten Ebbesen, 337355. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Donati, S.. 2014. “English Commentaries before Scotus. A Case Study: The Discussion on the Unity of Being.” In Amerini, F. and Galluzzo, G., eds. A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, 137207. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Doucet, V. 1936. “L’oeuvre scolastique de Richard de Conington, O. F. M.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 29: 396442.Google Scholar
Duba, W.O. 2007. “Continental Franciscan Quodlibeta After Scotus.” In Schabel, C., ed. Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth Century, 569649. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Duba, W.O., Friedman, R.L., and Schabel, C.. 2010. “Henry of Harclay and Aufredo Gonteri Brito.” In Rosemann, P.W., ed. Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, Vol. 2, 263368. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Duba, W.O. and Schabel, C.. 2017. “Remigio, Auriol, Scotus, and the Myth of the Two-Year Sentences Lecture at Paris.” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 84: 143–79.Google Scholar
Dumont, S.D. 1988. “The Univocity of the Concept of Being in the Fourteenth Century: II. The ‘De ente’ of Peter Thomae.” Mediaeval Studies 50: 188256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 1995a. “The Origins of Scotus’s Theory of Synchronic Contingency.” Modern Schoolman 72: 149167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 1995b. “Transcendental Being: Scotus and Scotists.” Topoi 11: 135148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 1996. “William of Ware, Richard of Conington, and the Oxford Collationes of Duns Scotus.” In Honnefelder, Wood, and Dreyer 1996, 59–87.Google Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 1998a. “Duns Scotus.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 3, 153170. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 1998b. “Scotus’s Doctrine of Univocity and the Medieval Tradition of Metaphysics.” In Aertsen, J.A. and Speer, A., eds. Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? 193212. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 2001. “Did Scotus Change His Mind on the Will?.” In Aersten, J.A., Emery, K., and Speer, A., eds. After the Condemnation of 1277: Philosophy and Theology at the University of Paris in the Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century, 719794. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 28. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 2003. “Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus.” In Marenbon, J., ed. Medieval Philosophy, 291328. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Dumont, S.D.. 2018. “John Duns Scotus’s Reportatio Parisiensis Examinata: A Mystery Solved.” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 85: 337438.Google Scholar
Effler, R. 1962. John Duns Scotus and the Principle ‘Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur’. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Ehrle, F. 1887. “Petrus Johannis Olivi, sein Leben und seine Schriften.” Archiv für Literatur und Kirchen Geschichte des Mittelalters 3: 377416.Google Scholar
Ehrle, F.. 1892. “Die ältesten Redactionen der Generalconstitutionen des Franziskanerordens.” Archiv für Literatur und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters 6: 1139Google Scholar
Emden, A.B. 1957–1959. A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to 1500. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Emery, K. and Smith, G.R.. 2014. “The Quaestio de Formalitatibus by John Duns Scotus, Sometimes Called the Logica Scoti.” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 56: 91182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emili, A. 2010. “Minio, Giovanni Di.” In Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, Vol. 74, 650–54. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
Fatigati, M. 2013. “The Causal Role of the Phantasm in Duns Scotus’s Cognitive Psychology.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Flint, T.P. 1998. Divine Providence: The Molinist Account. Ithaca: Cornell.Google Scholar
Frank, W.A. 1982. “Duns Scotus’ Concept of Willing Freely: What Divine Freedom beyond Choice Teaches Us.” Franciscan Studies 42: 6889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, W.A.. 1992. “Duns Scotus on Autonomous Freedom and Divine Co-Causality.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2: 142164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, E., ed. 1959. Corpus iuris canonici. 2 vols. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsamstalt.Google Scholar
Frost, G. 2010. “John Duns Scotus on God’s Knowledge of Sins: A Test Case for God’s Knowledge of Contingents.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48: 1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, G.. 2014. “Peter Olivi’s Rejection of God’s Concurrence with Secondary Causes.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 655679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, S. 1931. Statuta antiqua Universitatis Oxoniensis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. 1937. “Les seize premier Theoremata et la pensée de Duns Scot.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen-âge 11: 586.Google Scholar
Gilson, E.. 1952. Jean Duns Scot. Introduction à ses positions fondamentales. Paris: Vrin. (English translation: John Duns Scotus: Introduction to his Fundamental Positions. Translated by J. Colbert. New York: Bloomsbury, 2018.)Google Scholar
Glassberger, N. 1887. Chronica. Ad Claras Aquas (Quaracchi): Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
Glorieux, P. 1925. La littérature quodlibétique de 1260 à 1320. Belgium: Le Saulchoir Kain.Google Scholar
Glorieux, P.. 1933. Répertoire des maîtres en théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle. 2 vols. Etudes de philosophie médiévale 17. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Glorieux, P.. 1935. La littérature quodlibétique II. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Goris, W. 2018. “Scotus in Paris – On Univocity and the Portions of the Soul,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 85: 439469.Google Scholar
Goris, W. and Honnefelder, L., eds. 2018. John Duns Scotus’s Reportatio Parisiensis. Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 85: 369560.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. 1993. “Ontological Priority and John Duns Scotus.” The Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173): 460471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenway, D. 1971. “Ely: Bishops.” In Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae 1066–1300: Volume 2, Monastic Cathedrals (Northern and Southern Provinces), 4547. London: Institute of Historical Research.Google Scholar
de Nangis, Guillaume. 1843. Chronique latine de Guillaume de Nagis de 1113 à 1300: avec les continuations de cette chronique de 1300 à 1368. Edited by Géraud, H.. Société de l’histoire de France 33. Paris: J. Renouard et cie.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, E.W. 2019. “From Thomas Aquinas to the 1350s.” In Williams, T., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics, 5576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. H. 1862. “Illustrations of Domestic Manners during the Reign of Edward I.” Journal of the British Archaeological Association 18: 145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, R. 1890. “The Friars Preachers v. the University, A. D. 1311–1313.” In Burrows, M., ed. Collectanea II. Oxford Historical Society 16. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hauke, H. 1967. Die Lehre von der Beseligenden Schau nach Nikolaus Trivet. München: Universität München, Theologische Facultät.Google Scholar
Hechich, B. 1958. De immaculata conceptione beatae Mariae Virginis secundum Thomam de Sutton et Robertum de Cowton: Textus et doctrina. Bibliotheca Immaculatae Conceptionis 7. Romae: Academia Mariana Internationalis.Google Scholar
Hechich, B.. 2008. “Il Problema delle ‘Reportationes’ nell’eredità dottrinale del B. Giovanni Duns Scotus OFM.” In Núñez, M. Carbajo, ed. Giovanni Duns Scoto: Studi e ricerche nel VII centenario della sua morte in onore di P. César Saco Alarcón, 59129. Roma: Edizioni Antonianum.Google Scholar
Hill, R.M.T. 1975. The Rolls and Register of Bishop Oliver Sutton, 1280–1299. Volume VII: Ordinations May 19, 1290 – September 19, 1299. Publications of the Lincoln Record Society, Vol. 69. Lincoln: Ruddock and Sons.Google Scholar
Hoeres, W. 1962. Der Wille als reine Vollkommenheit nach Duns Scotus. München: Anton Pustet.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, L. 1989. Ens in quantum ens. Der Begriff des Seienden als solchen als Gegenstand der Metaphysik nach der Lehre des Johannes Duns Scotus. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, L. 2005. “Scotus und der Scotismus. Ein Beitrag zur Bedeutung der Schulbildung in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie.” In Hoenen, M.J.F.M., Schneider, J.H.J., and Wieland, G., eds. Philosophy and Learning in the Middle Ages, 249262. Education and Society in the Later Middle Ages and Renaissance 6. Leiden/New Yor/Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, . 2012. “John Duns Scotus on God’s Intellect and Will.” In Cross, R., ed. John Duns Scotus 1308–2008: The Opera Theologica of Scotus, 7388. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, L., Wood, R., and Dreyer, M., eds. 1996. John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, D. P. 2014. Postmodernity and Univocity: A Critical Account of Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incandela, J.M. 1992. “Duns Scotus and the Experience of Human Freedom.” The Thomist 56: 229256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, M.B. 2001. “Letting Scotus Speak for Himself.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10: 173216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarka-Sellers, H. 1998. “Liber de causis.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. Retrieved 18 Oct. 2018, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/liber-de-causis/v-1. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-B069-1.Google Scholar
Keele, R. 2007. “Can God Make a Picasso? William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Divine Power and Real Relations.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45: 395411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. 1994. “Duns Scotus on the Reality of Self-Change.” In Gill, M.L. and Lennox, J.G., eds. Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton, 227290. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, P.. 2003. “Scotus on Metaphysics.” In Williams 2003a, 15–68.Google Scholar
King, P.. 2010. “Scotus’s Rejection of Anselm: The Two-Wills Theory.” In Honnefelder, L. et al., eds. Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes/Investigations into his Philosophy, 359378. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Langston, D.C. 1986. God’s Willing Knowledge: The Influence of Scotus’s Analysis of Omniscience. University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Langston, D.C.. 1996. “Did Scotus Embrace Anselm’s Notion of Freedom?Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5: 145159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, D.C.. 2010. “God’s Willing Knowledge, Redux.” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 77: 235282.Google Scholar
Leader, D.R. 1984. “Philosophy at Oxford and Cambridge in the Fifteenth Century.” History of Universities 4: 2546.Google Scholar
Leff, G. 1968. Paris and Oxford Universities in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries; an Institutional and Intellectual History. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Little, A.G. 1892. The Grey Friars in Oxford: Part I: A History of Convent; Part II: Biographical Notices of the Friars, Together with Appendices of Original Documents. Oxford: Printed for the Oxford Historical Society at the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Little, A.G.. 1926. “The Franciscan School at Oxford in the Thirteenth Century.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 19: 803876.Google Scholar
Little, A.G.. 1932. “Chronological Notes on the Life of Duns Scotus,” The English Historical Review 47: 568582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, A.G.. 1940. “Theological Schools in Medieval England.” The English Historical Review 55 (220): 624630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, A.G.. 1943. Franciscan Papers, Lists, and Documents. Publications of the University of Manchester 284. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Little, A.G. and Pelster, F.. 1934. Oxford Theology and Theologians, c. A.D. 1282–1302. Oxford Historical Society 96. Oxford: The Clarendon Press for the Oxford Historical Society.Google Scholar
Lonfat, J. 2004. “Archéologie de la notion de l’analogie d’Aristote à Saint Thomas d’Aquin,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 71: 35107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longpré, E. 1929a. “L’ordination sacerdotale du Bx. Jean Duns Scot, document du 17 Mars 1291.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 22: 5462.Google Scholar
Longpré, E.. 1929b. “Nouveaux documents franciscains d’Ecosse,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 22: 588589.Google Scholar
Longpré, E.. 1935. “Une Réportation inédite du B. Duns Scot: le Ms Ripoll 53.” In Geisteswelt des Mittelalters. Studien und Texte, 974990. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Maierù, A. 1994. University Training in Medieval Europe. Education and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance 3. Leiden and New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Major, J. 1740. Historia Majoris Britanniae, tam Angliae quam Scotiae. Edinburgh: Robertum Fribarnium.Google Scholar
Major, J.. 1892. A History of Greater Britain, as Well England as Scotland. Translated by Archibald Constable. Edinburgh: T. and A. Constable.Google Scholar
Marcil, G. 1965. “Efficient Causality in the Philosophy of John Duns Scotus.” Doctoral dissertation. The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Marmo, C. 1994. Semiotica e linguaggio nella Scolastics. Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt 1270–1330. La semiotica dei Modisti. Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo.Google Scholar
Marrone, S.P. 1996. “Revisiting Duns Scotus and Henry of Ghent on Modality.” In Honnefelder, Wood, and Dreyer 1996, 175189.Google Scholar
Marrone, S.P.. 2001. The Light of Thy Countenance: Science and Knowledge of God in the Thirteenth Century. 2 vols. Leiden, Boston, and Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Martel, B. 1968. La psychologie de Gonsalve d’Espagne. Publications de l’Institut d’études médiévales 21. Montréal/Paris: Institut d’études médiévales/Vrin.Google Scholar
Martin, C.J. 2004. ‘Formal Consequence in Scotus and Ockham: Towards an Account of Scotus’ Logic.’ In Boulnois, O., Karger, E., Solère, J.-L., and Sondag, G., eds. Duns Scot à Paris: Actes du colloque de Paris, 2–4 Septembre 2002, 117150. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, A. 1955. “St. Thomas and the Analogy of Genus,” The New Scholasticism 29: 127144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, J.R.H. 1952. The Grey Friars in Cambridge, 1225–1538. Birkbeck Lectures, 1948–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moorman, J.R.H.. 1968. A History of the Franciscan Order from Its Origins to the Year 1517. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Regan, C. 2015. “Scotus the Nefarious: Uncovering Genealogical Sophistications.” In Ondrako, E.J., ed. The Newman Scotus Reader: Contexts and Commonalities, 611636. New Bedford, MA: Academy of the Immaculate.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2003. “Cognition.” In Williams 2003a, 285–311.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R.. 2010. “Form and Matter.” In Pasnau, R., ed. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, 635646. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R.. 2011. Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelster, F. 1922. “Thomas von Sutton O. Pr., Ein Oxforder Verteidiger der Thomistischen Lehre: II. Lehrmethode und Lehrrichtung des Thomas von Sutton.” Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie 46: 361401.Google Scholar
Perler, D. and Rudolph, U.. 2000. Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im Europäischen Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Piana, C. 1970. Chartularium studii Bononiensis S. Francisci (Saec. XIII-XVI). Analecta Franciscana 11. Florentiae: ex Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
Piché, D. 1999. La condamnation parisienne de 1277: texte latin, traduction, introduction et commentaire. Paris: Vrin, 1999.Google Scholar
Pini, G. 2002a. Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Categories in the Late Thirteenth Century. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pini, G.. 2002b. Scoto e l’analogia: Logica e metafisica nei commenti aristotelici. Pisa: Pubblicazioni della Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Pini, G.. 2005. “Univocity in Scotus’ Quaestiones super Metaphysicam: the Solution to a Riddle.” Medioevo 30: 69110.Google Scholar
Pini, G.. 2008. “Scotus on Doing Metaphysics in statu isto.” In Ingham, M.B. and Bychkov, O., eds. John Duns Scotus, Philosopher, 2955. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Pini, G.. 2010. “Scotus’s Legacy.” In Speer, A and Wirmer, D., eds. 1308: Eine Topographie historischer Gleichzeitigkeit, 486515. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 35. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pini, G.. 2014. “The Questions on the Metaphysics by John Duns Scotus: A Vindication of Pure Intellect.” In Galluzzo, G. and Amerini, F., eds. A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries to Aristotle’s Metaphysics, 359384. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pomplun, R.T. 2016. “John Duns Scotus in the History of Medieval Philosophy from the Sixteenth Century to Étienne Gilson (†1978).” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 58: 355445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porro, P. 2019. “Contro e dentro l’univocità. Le trasformazioni dell’analogia tra Tommaso d’Aquino, Enrico di Gand e Giovanni Duns Scoto.” In Salis, R., ed. La dottrina dell’analogia dell’essere nella ‘Metafisica’ di Aristotele e i suoi sviluppi nel pensiero tardo-antico e medievale, 247286. Padova: Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
Powicke, F.M. 1931. The Medieval Books of Merton College. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prentice, R. 1968. “Univocity and Analogy according to Scotus’s Super Libros Elenchorum Aristotelis.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 66: 225–43.Google Scholar
Prestwich, M. 2008. “Kirkby, John (d. 1290), Administrator and Bishop of Ely.” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quétif, J. and Échard, J.. 1719. Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum recensiti notisque historicis et criticis illustrati. Pari: apud J.-B.-C. Ballard et N. SimartGoogle Scholar
Rashdall, H. 1942. The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. New Edition. Edited by Powicke, F. M. and Emden, A.B.. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichert, B.M., ed. 1899. Acta capitulorum generalium Ordinis Praedicatorum: ab anno 1304 usque ad annum 1378. Monumenta Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum historica 4. Romae: In Domo Generalitia.Google Scholar
Roest, B. 2000. A History of Franciscan Education (c. 1210–1517). Education and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance 11. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roest, B.. 2014. Franciscan Learning, Preaching and Mission C. 1220–1650. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Salas, V.M. Jr. 2013. “Albert the Great and ‘Univocal Analogy’.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87: 611635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santogrossi, A. 1993. “Duns Scotus on Potency Opposed to Act in Questions on the Metaphysics.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67: 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, C., ed. 2006. Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. Vol. 1. Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Schabel, C.. 2020. “Ockham, The Principia of Holcot and Wodeham, and The Myth of The Two-Year Sentences Lecture at Oxford.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 81: 59102.Google Scholar
Schabel, C. and Smith, G.R.. 2012. “The Franciscan studium in Barcelona in the Early Fourteenth Century.” In Courtenay, W.J., Emery, K., and Metzger, S., eds. Philosophy and Theology in the Studia of the Religious Orders and at Papal and Royal Courts, 359392. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sileo, L., ed. 1995. Via Scoti: Methodologia ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti. Roma: Edizioni Antonianum.Google Scholar
Smith, G.R. 2010. “Bibliotheca manuscripta Petri Thomae.” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 52: 161200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G.R.. 2018. “Aufredo Gonteri on the Univocity of Being: Compilatio lecturae primi Sententiarum distinctio 3 quaestiones 2–4.” Mediaeval Studies 80: 59170.Google Scholar
Smith, G.R.. 2019. “The Analogy of Being in the Scotist Tradition.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93: 633673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmutz, J. 2002L’héritage des Subtils. Cartographie du scotisme au XVIIe siècle.” Les études philosophiques 1: 5181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmutz, J.. 2008. “Le petit scotisme du Grand Siècle. Étude doctrinale et documentaire sur la philosophie au grand Couvent des Cordeliers de Paris, 1517–1771.” Quaestio 8: 365472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. 2016. “Duns Scotus, the Natural Law, and the Irrelevance of Aesthetic Explanation.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4: 7899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroick, C. 1974Eine Pariser Disputation vom Jahre 1306: Die Verteidigung des Thomistischen Individuationsprinzips gegen Johannes Duns Scotus durch Guillelmus Petri de Godino, O.P.” In Eckart, W.P., ed. Thomas von Aquino: Interpretation und Rezeption: Studien und Texte, 559608. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. 2010. The Debate over Spiritual Matter in the Late Thirteenth Century: Gonsalvus Hispanus and the Franciscan Tradition from Bonaventure to Scotus. Doctoral dissertation. The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Terán-Dutari, J. 1970. “Die Geschichte des Terminus ‘Analogia Entis’ und das Werk Erich Przywaras.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 77: 163179.Google Scholar
Thomas of Eccleston. 1951. Fratris Thomae vulgo dicti de Eccleston Tractatus de adventu fratrum minorum in Angliam. Edited by Little, A.G.. 1st English edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, R.M. 2009. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts of Merton College, Oxford. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Thomson, R.M.. 2010. “William Reed, Bishop of Chichester (d. 1385) — Bibliophile?” In Brown, G.H. and Ehrsam Voigts, L., eds. The Study of Medieval Manuscripts of England: Festschrift in Honor of Richard W. Pfaff, 281293. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, Z. 2017. Medieval Problems of Secondary Causation and Divine Concurrence. Doctoral dissertation. Fordham University.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.A.C., ed. 1893. Lancashire Lay Subsidies: Being an Examination of the Lay Subsidy Rolls Remaining in the Public Record Office, London: From Henry III. to Charles II. Vol. I. Henry III to Edward I (1216–1307). London: Wyman.Google Scholar
Vos, A. 2019. John Duns Scotus: A Life. Kampen: Summum.Google Scholar
Ward, T.M. 2014. John Duns Scotus on Parts, Wholes, and Hylomorphism. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T.M.. 2019. “A Most Mitigated Friar: Scotus on Natural Law and Divine Freedom.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93: 385409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. 1997. “Reason, Morality, and Voluntarism in Duns Scotus: A Pseudo-Problem Dissolved.” The Modern Schoolman 74: 7394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T.. 1998a. “The Libertarian Foundations of Scotus’s Moral Philosophy.” The Thomist 62: 193215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T.. 1998b. “The Unmitigated Scotus.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80: 162181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T.. 2000. “A Most Methodical Lover? On the Rationality of Scotus’s God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 38: 169202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T., ed. 2003a. The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, T.. 2003b. “Introduction: The Life and Works of John Duns the Scot.” In Williams, T., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus, 114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, T.. 2009. “The Divine Nature and Scotus’s Libertarianism: A Reply to Mary Beth Ingham.” Available from http://profthomaswilliams.com/The Divine Nature and Scotus’s Libertarianism.pdf.Google Scholar
Williams, T., ed. and trans. 2017. John Duns Scotus: Selected Writings in Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willibrord, L. 1931. “B. Ioannes Duns Scotus, Lector Coloniensis,” Collectanea Franciscana Neerlandica 2: 291306.Google Scholar
Wippel, J.F. 1981. The Metaphysical Thought of Godfrey of Fontaines: A Study in Late Thirteenth-Century Philosophy. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Wippel, J.F.. 2000. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. 1980. “Asymmetrical Freedom.” Journal of Philosophy 77: 151166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, A.B. 1946. The Transcendentals and Their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Wolter, A.B.. 1949. “Duns Scotus on the Natural Desire for the Supernatural.” New Scholasticism 32: 282317. Reprinted in A.B. Wolter. The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, 125–147. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wolter, A.B.. 1972. “The Native Freedom of the Will as a Key to the Ethics of Scotus.” In Bérubé, C., ed. Deus et Homo ad mentem I. Duns Scoti. Roma: Societas Internationalis Scotistica, 360370. Reprinted in A.B. Wolter. The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, 148–162. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wolter, A.B.. 1990. “Scotus’s Paris Lecture on God’s Knowledge of Future Events” In Wolter, A.B., The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, 285333. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wolter, A.B.. 1993. “Reflections on the Life and Works of Duns-Scotus.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67: 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, A.B.. 1994. “Alnwick on Scotus and Divine Concurrence.” In Carroll, W.J. and Furlong, J.J., eds. Greek and Medieval Studies in Honor of Leo Sweeney S.J., 255283. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Wolter, A.B.. 2015. “The Unshredded Scotus.” In Wolter, A.B., ed. The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, 241290. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Wolter, A.B., ed. and trans. 1987. Duns Scotus on the Will and Morality. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Xiberta, B.M. 1931. De scriptoribus scholasticis saeculi XIV ex ordine Carmelitanum. Louvain: Bureaux de la Revue.Google Scholar