Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-hg4f7 Total loading time: 0.573 Render date: 2022-06-27T07:39:28.386Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

4 - The Trade Effects of Environmental Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements

from Part II - Top-Down: Public Approaches to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Cosimo Beverelli
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Jürgen Kurtz
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Damian Raess
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute, University of Bern
Get access

Summary

The international community has acknowledged that international trade can be an effective means of helping to achieve the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Traditionally, preferential trade agreements (PTAs) were designed to promote trade flows. PTAs have become more comprehensive and now also cover non-economic policy areas, such as the environment. This chapter examines whether the inclusion of environmental provisions in PTAs changes the observed overall positive contribution that PTAs make to economic outcomes and thereby to the economic objectives of the SDGs. Specifically, we ask whether the inclusion of environmental provisions in PTAs reduces export flows between PTA partner countries. Using a novel data set on environmental provisions in PTAs, we estimate gravity type panel regressions. We find that membership in PTAs including more environmental provisions is associated with less trade among trade partners compared to PTAs that include less or no environmental provisions. This negative effect of environmental provisions is fully driven by the negative effect on South–North trade flows, i.e. exports from developing to high-income countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baccini, L. (2019). “The Economics and Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements.Annual Review of Political Science 22: 7592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccini, L., Pinto, P. and Weymouth, S. (2017). “The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: A Firm-Level Analysis.International Organization 71: 373395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baghdadi, L., Martinez-Zarzoso, I. and Zitouna, H. (2013). “Are RTA Agreements with Environmental Provisions Reducing Emissions?Journal of International Economics 90: 378390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). “Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members” International Trade?Journal of International Economics 71: 7295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2009). “Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics.Journal of International Economics 77: 6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H. and Feng, M. (2014). “Economic Integration Agreements and the Margins of International Trade.Journal of International Economics 93: 339350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaens, I. and Postnikov, E. (2017). “Greening Up: The Effects of Environmental Standards in EU and US Trade Agreements.Environmental Politics 26: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaens, I. and Postnikov, E. (2019). “Social Standards in Trade Agreements and Free Trade Preferences: An Empirical Investigation”, Review of International Organizations. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09356-y.Google Scholar
Bättig, M. and Bernauer, T. (2009). “National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy?International Organization 63: 281308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, M. M., Bernauer, T. and Meyer, R. (2012). “The Green Side of Protectionism: Environmental Concerns and Three Facets of Trade.Review of International Political Economy 19: 837866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, T. and Nguyen, O. (2015). “Free Trade and/or Environmental Protection?Global Environmental Politics 15: 105129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. N. (1995). “Trade Liberalisation and Fair Trade Demands: Addressing the Environmental and Labour Standards Issues.The World Economy 18: 745759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. N. and Hudec, R. E., eds. (1996). Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade?” Economic Analysis. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blümer, D., Morin, J.-F., Brandi, C. and Berger, A. (2019). “Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements: Defending Regulatory Space or Pursuing Offensive Interests?” Environmental Politics 29: 866–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandi, C., Blümer, D. and Morin, J.-F. (2019). “When Do International Treaties Matter for Domestic Environmental Legislation?Global Environmental Politics 19: 1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandi, C., Schwab, J., Morin, J.-F. and Berger, A. (2020). “Do Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements Make Exports from Developing Countries Greener?World Development 129: May, 104899. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business Europe (2014). Trade-Roadmap for the European Commission. Available at www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2014–01000-E.pdf.Google Scholar
Büthe, T. and Milner, H. (2014). “Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Diversity in Trade Agreements: Credibility, Commitment, and Economic Flows in the Developing World, 1971–2007.World Politics 66: 88122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. (2004). “Trade, Growth and the Environment.Journal of Economic Literature 46: 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A., Baccini, L. and Elsig, M. (2014). “The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Dataset.Review of International Organizations 9: 353375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ederington, J. and Minier, J. (2003). “Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis.Canadian Journal of Economics 36: 137154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, H., Egger, P. and Greenaway, D. (2008). “The Trade Structure Effects of Endogenous Regional Trade Agreements.Journal of International Economics 74: 278298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, P., Larch, M., Staub, K. E. and Winkelmann, R. (2011). “The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements.American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3: 113143.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C. (1994). Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment, and the Future. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C. (2001). “Bridging the Trade-Environment Divide.The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 113130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, C., and Ornelas, E. (2010). “Regional Trade Agreements.Annual Review of Economics 2: 139166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugazza, M. and Nicita, A. (2013). “The Direct and Relative Effects of Preferential Market Access.Journal of International Economics 89: 357368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, K. (2004). Free Trade and the Environment: Mexico, NAFTA, and Beyond. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
George, C. (2014). Environment and Regional Trade Agreements: Emerging Trends and Policy Drivers. OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1993). “Environment Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement.” In Garber, P. M. (ed.), The Mexican-US Free Trade Agreement. MIT Press, pp. 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Mosley, L. and Galantucci, R. (2019). “Protecting Workers Abroad and Industries at Home: Rights-Based Conditionality in Trade Preference Programs.Journal of Conflict Resolution 63: 12531282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H., Mavroidis, P. C., and Sapir, A. (2010). “Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements.World Economy 33: 15651588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C., Esty, D. C., Orejas, D., Rubio, L. and Schott, J. J. (2000). NAFTA and the Environment: Seven Years Later. Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. and Lindsay, A. (2016). “Diffusion through Issue Linkage: Environmental Norms in US Trade Agreements.Global Environmental Politic 16: 4161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. (2015). “Information Revelation and Structural Supremacy: The World Trade Organization’s Incorporation of Environmental Policy.The Review of International Organizations 10: 207229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, T., Brakman, S. and Garretsen, H. (2016). “Do Trade Agreements Stimulate International Trade Differently? Evidence from 296 Trade Agreements.World Economy 39: 97131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (1997). “What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?Journal of Economic Literature 35: 113120.Google Scholar
Lechner, L. (2016). “The Domestic Battle over the Design of Non-trade Issues in Preferential Trade Agreements.Review of International Political Economy 23: 840871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, L. (2018). “Good for Some, Bad for Others: US Investors and Non-trade Issues in Preferential Trade Agreements.The Review of International Organizations 13: 163187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, C. S. (2008). “New Measures of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion.Journal of International Economics 75: 349362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Zarzoso, I. and Oueslati, W. (2016). “Are Deep and Comprehensive Regional Trade Agreements Helping to Reduce Air Pollution?” CEGE Discussion Papers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattoo, A., Mulabdic, A. and Ruta, M. (2017). “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Deep Agreements. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, T. and Zignago, S. (2011). “Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist database.” CEPII Working Paper 2011–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milewicz, K., Hollway, J., Peacock, C. and Snidal, D. (2018). “Beyond Trade: The Expanding Scope of the Nontrade Agenda in Trade Agreements.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62: 743773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J.-F., Bluemer, D., Brandi, C. and Berger, A. (2019). “Kick-Starting Diffusion: Explaining the Varying Frequency of PTAs” Clauses by Their Initial Conditions.The World Economy 42: 26022628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J.-F., Dür, A. and Lechner, L. (2018). “Mapping the Trade and Environment Nexus: Insights from a New Dataset.Global Environmental Politics 18: 122139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. and Visbeck, M. (2016). “Policy: Map the Interactions between Sustainable Development Goals.Nature News 534: 320322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaffermayr, M. (2019). “Gravity Models, PPML Estimation and the Bias of the Robust Standard Errors.Applied Economics Letters 26: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, C. F. (1990). “Trade Protectionism and Environmental Regulations: The New Nontariff Barriers.Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 11: 4761.Google Scholar
Santos Silva, J. M. C. and Tenreyro, S. (2010). “On the Existence of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Poisson Regression.Economics Letters 107: 310312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilker, G., Bernauer, T., Kim, I. S., Milner, H., Osgood, I. and Tingley, D. (2018). “Trade at the Margin: Estimating the Economic Implications of Preferential Trade Agreements.The Review of International Organizations 13: 189242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, A. (1992). “Trade Measures for Environment: A Nearly Empty Box?World Economy 15: 135152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly A/RES/70/1, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Winters, L. A. and Martuscelli, A. (2014). “Trade Liberalization and Poverty: What Have We Learned in a Decade?Annual Review of Resource Economics 6: 493512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelli, F., Gupta, A. and van Asselt, H. (2013). “Institutional Interactions at the Crossroads of Trade and Environment: The Dominance of Liberal Environmentalism?Global Governance 19: 105118.Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Xi Tian, X. and Zhou, Z. (2017). “The Effects of Environmental Provisions in RTAs on PM2.5 Air Pollution.Applied Economics 49: 26302641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×