The UN human rights treaty system

Ilias Bantekas; Lutz Oette

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139048088.006

This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

5 - The UN human rights treaty system

Ilias Bantekas and

Lutz Oette

Show author details

Ilias Bantekas: Affiliation:
Brunel University
Lutz Oette: Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

UN treaty bodies constitute the main institutional vehicle for the application of international human rights law. Bodies such as the UN HRCtee are by no means the only international mechanisms that address issues of human rights protection. Indeed, bodies as diverse as the ILO and the World Bank employ special procedures dealing with human rights questions. International tribunals and courts, particularly the ICJ, are increasingly adjudicating cases that have a bearing on international human rights law. Yet, human rights treaty bodies fulfil a special role in that they are the only entities within the UN system that states have explicitly mandated to monitor compliance with their human rights treaty obligations.

Treaty bodies fulfil a range of functions, from promotional activities to monitoring and adjudicating complaints. These tasks, which are taken for granted today, are the result of states’ willingness to vest treaty bodies with the mandate of monitoring compliance. This constituted a remarkable shift away from earlier notions of sovereignty in a system where states were, essentially, the sole authors, interpreters and enforcers of rights and obligations. What accounts for this change and why do states agree to be part of such regimes? This question, which has attracted considerable attention in recent years, poses a particular challenge because it does not seem to conform to the realist views that used to hold considerable sway in international relations, according to which states use institutions as a means to exercise power. Alternative theories emphasise states’ interests (enhancing reputation and avoiding sanctions) or point to ‘acculturation’. This denotes a process of interaction of various actors which generates a pull to build and join credible human rights mechanisms as part of an international order. Indeed, these mechanisms form part of broader international institution-building, particularly at the UN level. The development of UN treaty bodies has witnessed a steady growth after a slow beginning in which it took over twenty years and numerous debates to set up the first two, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the HRCtee.

Type: Chapter
Information: International Human Rights Law and Practice , pp. 181 - 218

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048088.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alen, A. et al. (eds.), A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).

Baderin, M. and McCorquodale, R., ‘The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Forty Years of Development’, in Baderin and McCorquodale (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Action (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 3–24.

Keller, H. and Ulfstein, G., UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Law and Legitimacy (Cambridge University Press, 2012).

Langford, M. (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008) (various contributions on the role of several committees).

McGoldrick, D., The Human Rights Committee: Its Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

Nowak, M., UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, 2nd edn (Kehl am Rhein: Engels, 2005).

Nowak, M. and McArthur, E., The United Nations Convention against Torture: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2008).

Schöpp-Schilling, H. B. and Flinterman, C. (eds.), The Circle of Empowerment: Twenty-Five Years of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (New York: The Feminist Press, 2007).

Sohn, L. B. and Buergenthal, T., International Protection of Human Rights (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973).

Wolfrum, R., ‘The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination’, MPYBUNL 3 (1999), 489–519.Google Scholar

UN: (main UN organs).

OHCHR: (providing links to all human rights treaty and charter bodies, i.e. HRC and Special Procedures, country specific documents; text of international treaties and status of ratification).

Universal Human Rights Index Database: (provides easy access to country-specific human rights information emanating from international human rights mechanisms in the United Nations system: the treaty bodies, the special procedures and the UPR).

UN: (main UN organs).

OHCHR: (providing links to all human rights treaty and charter bodies, i.e. HRC and Special Procedures, country specific documents; text of international treaties and status of ratification).

Oberleitner, G., Global Human Rights Institutions: Between Remedy and Ritual (Cambridge: Polity, 2007, reprinted 2008), 106–12.

Skogly, S., Human Rights Obligations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (London: Cavendish, 2001), 35–6 and 180–5;

Darrow, M., Between Light and Shadow: The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Hart, 2003)

Sivakumaran, S., ‘The International Court of Justice and Human Rights’, in S. Joseph and A. McBeth, Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law (Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2010), 299–325;

Simma, B., ‘Mainstreaming Human Rights: the Contribution of the International Court of Justice’, JIDS 3(1) (2012), 7–29.Google Scholar

Okafor, O. C., The African Human Rights System, Activist Forces and International Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 12–62;

Rajagopal, B., International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance (Cambridge University Press, 2003), 66–7.

Anghie, A., ‘Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions: Sovereignty, Economy, and the Mandate System of the League of Nations’, N.Y.U.J. Int’l L. & Pol. 34 (2002), 513–633, at 523–8.Google Scholar

Devereux, A., ‘Australia and the International Scrutiny of Civil and Political Rights: an Analysis of Australia’s Negotiating Policies, 1946–1966’, AYIL 22 (2003), 47–75, at 54–60.Google Scholar

Tyagi, Y., The UN Human Rights Committee: Practice and Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 58–60.

Cançado Trindade, A. A., The Access of Individuals to International Justice (Oxford University Press, 2011),

Charlesworth, H., ‘Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations’, Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 18 (2005), 1–18.Google Scholar

OHCHR, Manual on Human Rights Reporting under six major international human rights instruments (Geneva: United Nations, 1997);

Bayefsky, A. (ed.), The UN Human Rights Treaty System in the 21st century (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000).

Clapham, A., ‘The UN Human Rights Reporting Procedures: an NGO Perspective’, in J. Crawford and P. Alston (eds.), The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 175–98,

OHCHR, Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil Society (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2008),

Kelly, T., ‘The Cause of Human Rights: Doubts about Torture, Law, and Ethics at the United Nations’, JRAI 17 (2011), 728–44.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, T., ‘The UN Human Rights Committee’, MPYBUNL 5 (2001), 341–98, at 351.Google Scholar

Heyns, C. and Viljoen, F., The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), 26–7,

Kälin, W., ‘Examination of State Reports’, in H. Keller and G. Ulfstein (eds.), UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 16–72, at 32,

Nowak, M. and Kozma, J., A World Court of Human Rights (June 2009),

CtEDAW, Violence against Women, General Recommendation 12 (1989) and General Recommendation 19 (1992).

CtAT, General Comment 2: Implementation of Article 2 by States Parties, UN Doc. CAT/C/GC/2 (24 January 2008).

HRCtee, General Comment 31: The Nature of the General Legal Obligation imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (26 May 2004).

Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. Grootboom and Others, 2000

Korkelia, K., ‘New Challenges to the Regime of Reservations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, EJIL 13(2) (2002), 437–77,Google Scholar

Baylis, E. A., ‘General Comment 24: Confronting the Problem of Reservations to Human Rights Treaties’, Berkeley J. Int’l L. 17 (1999), 277–329.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A. and van Alebeek, R., The Legal Status of Decisions by Human Rights Treaty Bodies in National Law, ACIL Research Paper no. 2011-02 (11 April 2011), 18–19.

Tomuschat, C., Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008), 51–2.

Open Society Justice Initiative, From Judgment to Justice, Implementing International and Regional Human Rights Decisions (New York: Open Society Foundations, 2010), 117–36.

Riedel, E., ‘New Bearings to Social Rights: the Communications Procedure under the ICESCR’, in U. Fastenrath et al., From Bilateralism to Community Interest, Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford University Press, 2011), 574–89.

Book contents

5 - The UN human rights treaty system

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive