Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-b9rrs Total loading time: 0.677 Render date: 2022-12-04T02:08:11.946Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 19 - Looking Back, Moving Forward

Assessment Futures in the Global Village

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

Sumaya Laher
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Get access

Summary

To look forward, it is necessary to look back and learn from the past. Hence this diverse collection of histories provides an excellent opportunity to reflect on what a future assessment might look like globally. Across the regions the themes for the future of assessment were similar. These centered around the need to adapt tests, to incorporate more local or emic assessments, as well as the need to use more indigenous knowledge. There was a clear narrative of a lack of training and resources in countries that would typically be described as developing or as low- to middle-income countries. This need was also evident in countries that are relatively developed but engaged with psychological assessment later in their histories in comparison to the United States, Britain, France, and Germany, for example. Typically, countries that were colonized, especially those colonized by Britain, showed more developments in the field of assessment as they had more contact with early developments in the field. This chapter reflects on the international histories of assessment and provides an overarching view on what we assess, why we assess, who assesses, and how we assess. In so doing the chapter presents a possible blueprint for the way forward for assessment in the global village that will be equally accessible and applicable to all.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akoodie, Y. (2020). Gamification in psychological assessment in South Africa: A narrative review. African Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2(0), a24. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v2i0.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M. (2012). Mainstreaming culture in psychology. American Psychologist, 67(8), 721730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daouk-Öyry, L., Zeinoun, P., Choueiri, L., & van de Vijver, F. (2016). Integrating global and local perspectives in psycholexical studies: A GloCal approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 62, 1928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauri, P. & Van Eerden, J. (2019). What the fifth industrial revolution is and why it matters. Retrieved from https://europeansting.com/2019/05/16/what-the-fifth-industrial-revolution-is-and-why-it-matters/.Google Scholar
Harlow, L. L. & Oswald, F. L. (2016). Big data in psychology: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 447457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, E. & Bardey, A. C. (2019) Do Instagram profiles accurately portray personality? An investigation into idealized online self-presentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 871. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 6183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iliescu, D. (2017). Adapting tests in linguistic and cultural situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316273203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, D. & Grieff, S. (2019). The impact of technology on psychological testing in practice and policy: What will the future bring. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(2), 151155. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekae-Moletsane, M. (2008). Masekitlana: South African traditional play as a therapeutic tool in child psychotherapy. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 367375. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630803800208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70, 543–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laher, S. (2020). The 4I=R2 framework: Advancing an agenda for psychological assessment in South Africa. Inaugural address presented at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Retrieved from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_E_f3Ookt8&feature=youtu.be.Google Scholar
Laher, S. (2015). Exploring the utility of the CPAI-2 in a South African sample: Implications for the FFM. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 6175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laher, S., Cheung, F. & Zeinoun, P. (2020). Gender and personality research in Psychology: The need for intersectionality. In Cheung, F. & Halpern, D. (eds). The Cambridge international handbook on psychology of women. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laher, S. & Cockcroft, K. (2017). Moving from culturally biased to culturally responsive assessment practices in low resource, multicultural settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(2), 115121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laher, S. & Cockcroft, K. (2014). Psychological assessment in post-apartheid South Africa: the way forward. South African Journal of Psychology, 44(3), 303314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macqueen, P. (2019). Artificial Intelligence. InPsych. Retrieved from www.compassconsulting.com.au/page/News_Articles/White_Papers/, accessed 17 January 2021.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means and how to respond. Retrieved from www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C., Bartram, D. & Reynolds, D. H. (2017). Next generation technology-enhanced assessment: Global perspectives on occupational and workplace testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×