Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-hg4f7 Total loading time: 0.362 Render date: 2022-06-26T00:33:37.867Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

7 - Trial proceedings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Gideon Boas
Monash University, Victoria
James L. Bischoff
U.S. Department of State
Natalie L. Reid
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York
B. Don Taylor III
ICTY, The Hague, The Netherlands
Get access


Trial is the central and most visible phase of an international criminal prosecution. In all the international criminal tribunals examined in this series, it is the public forum in which the prosecution and defence question witnesses, present documentary and other evidence, and make legal arguments before a panel of judges who serve as finders of both fact and law. Since the majority of accused before international criminal tribunals choose to contest the charges against them rather than plead guilty, most cases to date have featured a trial, and the trial has usually been lengthy. Rarely has a trial chamber completed a trial in under a year, and trials lasting two or more years are common. While the extended length of these trials has been criticised for potentially violating the rights of accused, the reasons for delays are complex. Delay often occurs as a result of the unavoidable confluence of a challenging political context, complex substantive law, a heavy caseload, and persistent scarcity of resources.

This chapter explores the trial phase of international criminal prosecutions, focusing on the ad hoc Tribunals, the ICC, and the SCSL. While differences exist in the trial procedures of these tribunals, trial before all of them is largely adversarial and the corresponding rules are similar in nature, and they will thus be discussed in tandem. Section 7.1 begins by looking at the process for appointing judges to a trial bench.

International Criminal Law Practitioner Library
International Criminal Procedure
, pp. 250 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Harmon, Mark B., ‘The Pre-Trial Process at the ICTY as a Means of Ensuring Expeditious Trials: A Potential Unrealized’, (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice377, 383–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rearick, Daniel J., ‘Innocent Until Alleged Guilty: Provisional Release at the ICTR,’ (2003) 44 Harvard International Law Journal577, 578Google Scholar
Kwon, O-Gon, ‘The Challenge of an International Criminal Trial as Seen from the Bench’, (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice360, 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippman, David, ‘The Costs of International Justice’, (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law861, 875Google Scholar
Carroll, Christina M., ‘An Assessment of the Role and Effectiveness of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the Rwandan National Justice System in Dealing with Mass Atrocities of 1994’, (2000) 18 Boston University International Law Journal163, 181–184Google Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos and Burke-White, William W., ‘International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism’, (2010) 59 Duke Law Journal637, 667–671Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik, ‘The Politics of International Judicial Appointments’, (2009) 9 Chicago Journal of International Law387, 390Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘“Witness Proofing” Before the International Criminal Court: A Reply to Karemaker, Taylor, and Pittman’, (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law911, 915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Gideon, ‘The Case for a New Appellate Jurisdiction for International Criminal Law’, in Goran Sluiter and Sergey Vasiliev (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law (2009), p. 445Google Scholar
Cockayne, James, ‘Special Court for Sierra Leone: Decisions on the Recusal of Judges Robertson and Winter’, (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechênes, Jules, ‘Excusing and Disqualification of Judges’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article (1999), p. 626Google Scholar
Zagaris, Bruce, ‘Law of War: A Bomb Kills Croatian Witness Who Was Cooperating with War Crimes Tribunal’, (2000) 16 International Enforcement Law Reporter977Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P., Balkan Justice (1997), pp. 171–72
Leigh, Monroe, ‘The Yugoslav Tribunal: Use of Unnamed Witnesses Against Accused’, (1996) 90 American Journal of International Law235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, Christine M., ‘Due Process and Witness Anonymity’, (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, Monroe, ‘Witness Anonymity Is Inconsistent with Due Process’, (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elberling, Björn, ‘The Next Step in History-Writing Through Criminal Law: Exactly How Tailor-Made Is the Special Tribunal for Lebanon?’, (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law529, 535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karemaker, Ruben, Taylor, B. Don III, and Pittman, Thomas Wayde, ‘Witness Proofing in International Criminal Tribunals: A Critical Analysis of Widening Procedural Divergence’, (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law683Google Scholar
Karemaker, Ruben, B. Don Taylor III, and Thomas Wayde Pittman, ‘Witness Proofing in International Criminal Tribunals: Response to Ambos’, (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordash, Wayne, ‘The Practice of “Witness Proofing” in International Criminal Tribunals: Why the International Criminal Court Should Prohibit the Practice’, (2009) 22 Leiden Journal of International Law501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliev, Sergey, ‘Proofing the Ban on “Witness Proofing”: Did the ICC Get It Right?’, (2009) 20 Criminal Law Forum193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaparayi, Idi, ‘The Milošević Trial at the Halfway Stage: Judgement on the Motion for Acquittal’, (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Andrew N., ‘Punishment for Violations of International Criminal Law: An Analysis of Sentencing at the ICTY and ICTR’, (2001) 12 Indiana International and Comparative Law Review53, 73 (2001)Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M., ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Comes of Age: Some Observations on Day-to-Day Dilemmas of an International Court’, (2001) 5 Washington University Journal of Law and Policy87, 93–94Google Scholar
Sluiter, Göran, ‘The ICTY and Offences against the Administration of Justice’, (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice631–632 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundis, Daryl A., ‘From “Common Law” Towards “Civil Law”: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats