Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-2h7tr Total loading time: 0.35 Render date: 2022-06-30T14:41:55.742Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

1 - The nature of international criminal procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Gideon Boas
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
James L. Bischoff
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of State
Natalie L. Reid
Affiliation:
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York
B. Don Taylor III
Affiliation:
ICTY, The Hague, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Few today would dispute the existence of substantive international criminal law and its legitimacy under international law. With some noteworthy exceptions, it is well accepted that the core categories of crimes, their underlying offences, and the forms of responsibility listed in the statutes of the international and internationalised criminal courts and tribunals (collectively, ‘international criminal tribunals’) are established in customary international law, treaty law or general principles of international law. The same cannot be said, however, for the procedural rules that govern the conduct of international criminal proceedings. Despite fifteen years of procedural activity at the international criminal tribunals, generating far more jurisprudence on matters of procedure than on substantive law, considerable scepticism remains about the legitimacy of international criminal procedure as a body of international law in its own right.

This third volume of the International Criminal Law Practitioner Library Series presents international criminal procedure as a comprehensive and coherent body by describing and explaining the framework within which substantive international criminal law is developed and applied at the tribunals. The first three chapters look at the infrastructure of the international criminal tribunals, including the sources of rules of international criminal procedure and the tribunals' relationship with national courts. The remaining chapters examine the key procedures as defined and elaborated in the governing instruments and jurisprudence of the international criminal tribunals, including those relating to investigations, detention, assignment of defence counsel and self-representation, the pre-trial and trial processes, victim participation, evidence, judgement, sentencing, and appeal.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Criminal Law Practitioner Library
International Criminal Procedure
, pp. 1 - 20
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., and Reid, Natalie L., Forms of Responsibility in International Criminal Law (2007), pp. 113–114
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., and Reid, Natalie L., Elements of Crimes in International Criminal Law (2008), pp. 5–9 (‘Boas, Bischoff, and Reid, Elements of Crimes’)
Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law (2nd edn 2008), pp. 13–22
Cryer, Robert, Håkan Friman, Darryl Robinson, and Elizabeth Wilmshurst, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (2007), pp. 6–12
Zahar, Alexander and Sluiter, Göran, International Criminal Law: A Critical Introduction (2007), pp. 79–105
Khan, Karim and Dixon, Rodney, Archbold International Criminal Courts: Practice, Procedure, and Evidence (2nd edn 2005), pp. 7–14
Mendelson, Maurice H., ‘Formation of Customary International Law’, (1998) 272 Recueil des Cours165, 188, 203Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan, ‘Universal International Law’, (1993) 87 American Journal of International Law529, 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (1961), p. 209
Triggs, Gillian D., International Law: Contemporary Principles and Practices (2006), p. 3
Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Province of International Judicial Law’, (1983) 21 Notre Dame International Law Journal21, 25 (‘Schwarzenberger, “International Judicial Law”’)Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Problem of an International Criminal Law’, (1950) 3 Current Legal Problems263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, Göran, ‘The Law of International Criminal Procedure and Domestic War Crimes Trials’, (2006) 6 International Criminal Law Review605, 606 (emphasis in original)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, Göran, ‘Due Process and Criminal Procedure in the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers’, (2006) Journal of International Criminal Justice314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, Ernestine E., ‘The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia for Prosecuting Crimes Committed by the Khmer Rouge: Jurisdiction, Organization, and Procedure of an Internationalized National Tribunal’, in Romano, Cesare P.R., Nollkaemper, André, and Kleffner, Jann K. (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia (2004), pp. 224–228Google Scholar
Kreß, Claus, ‘The Procedural Texts of the International Criminal Court’, (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice537, 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliev, Sergey, ‘General Rules and Principles of International Criminal Procedure: Definition, Legal Nature, and Identification’, in Sluiter, Göran and Vasiliev, Sergey(eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards A Coherent Body of Law (2008), p. 11Google Scholar
Virally, M., ‘The Sources of International Law’, in Sørensen, M. (ed.), Manual of Public International Law (1968), pp. 144–
Schwarzenberger, Georg, The Inductive Approach to International Law (1965), p. 89
Meron, Theodor, ‘Editorial Comment: Revival of Customary Humanitarian Law’, (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law817, 818, 821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John, ‘Creating Evidentiary Processes in the International Criminal Tribunals that Are Fit for Purpose: Beyond the Common Law–Civil Law Divide’, (2009) Journal of International Criminal Justice17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorda, Claude, ‘The Major Hurdles and Accomplishments of the ICTY’, (2004) Journal of International Criminal Justice572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Opinion: The ICTY and Human Rights’, (1997) European Human Rights Law Review329Google Scholar
Safferling, Christoph, Towards an International Criminal Procedure (2001), pp. 21–30
Robinson, Patrick L., ‘Fair but Expeditious Trials’, in Abtahi, Hirad and Boas, Gideon(eds.), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Richard May (2005), p. 169 (‘Robinson, “Fair but Expeditious Trials”’)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairlie, Megan, ‘The Marriage Between Common and Continental Law at the ICTY and Its Progeny: Due Process Deficit’, (2004) 4 International Criminal Law Review243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Patrick L., ‘Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law569 (‘Robinson, “Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials”’)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan, ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Contemporary Experiments’, (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulkens, Françoise, ‘Main Comparable Features of the Different European Criminal Justice Systems’, in Delmas-Marty, Mireille, The Criminal Process and Human Rights: Toward a European Consciousness (1995), p. 5
Robinson, Patrick L., ‘Rough Edges in the Alignment of Legal Systems in the Proceedings at the ICTY’, (2005) 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice1, 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Gideon, ‘Comparing the ICTY and the ICC: Some Procedural and Substantive Issues’, (2000) 47 Netherlands International Law Review267, 278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundis, Daryl A., ‘From “Common Law” Towards “Civil Law”: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Gideon, The Milošević Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings (2007), pp. 39–41

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×