Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-rpbls Total loading time: 0.513 Render date: 2022-06-27T19:03:03.644Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

5 - Defence counsel, amici curiae, and the different forms of representation of accused

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Gideon Boas
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
James L. Bischoff
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of State
Natalie L. Reid
Affiliation:
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York
B. Don Taylor III
Affiliation:
ICTY, The Hague, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

In any criminal justice system, including those set up to try persons thought responsible for international crimes, fundamental human rights principles demand that accused persons have the ability to defend themselves against criminal allegations. Among these fundamental rights are the right to be represented by qualified defence counsel, at no cost if the accused cannot afford counsel; and, with certain limitations developed in the jurisprudence, the right to conduct their own defence. Defence representation before international criminal tribunals can take many forms, including privately funded defence counsel; tribunal-funded defence counsel; self-representation, which implicates a range of procedural and resource issues; and even the use of amici curiae to perform many of the tasks traditionally performed by defence counsel. There are two basic categories of legal representation in international criminal law: representation by counsel and self-representation. As will be discussed in some depth, these two different models of representation give rise to variants that impact significantly on the capacity of international criminal tribunals to deliver a fair trial.

This chapter considers the regulatory structure and jurisprudence relating to these different procedural models. Like most chapters in this volume, the chapter focuses mainly on the ICC, ICTY, and ICTR, with occasional reference to the SCSL, Special Tribunal for Lebanon (‘STL’), or another internationalised tribunal if their relevant procedures illustrate an innovative approach or otherwise aid the analysis of the key issues surrounding representation of accused persons. Where procedures across the tribunals vary significantly, we discuss each tribunal in a separate subsection.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Criminal Law Practitioner Library
International Criminal Procedure
, pp. 136 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robinson, Patrick L., ‘Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law569, 572–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappalà, Salvatore, Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings (2003), p. 5
Safferling, Christoph, Towards an International Criminal Procedure (2001), p. 36
McIntyre, Gabrielle, ‘Defining Human Rights in the Arena of International Humanitarian Law: Human Rights in the Jurisprudence of the ICTY’, in Gideon Boas and William A. Schabas (eds.), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY (2002), p. 193Google Scholar
Zahar, Alexander and Sluiter, Göran, International Criminal Law: A Critical Introduction (2008), pp. 19, 60
Bassiouni, M. Cherif and Manikas, Peter, The Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (1996), p. 298
Bohlander, Michael, ‘The Defence’, in Boas, Gideon and Schabas, William A., International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY (2003), p. 39Google Scholar
Wetzel, Jan Erik and Mitri, Yvonne, ‘The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: A Court “Off the Shelf” for a Divided Country’, (2008) 7 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals81, 97–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aptel, Cécile, ‘Some Innovations in the Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon’, (2005) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice1107, nn. 29, 36 (citing Report of the Secretary-General on the Establishment of a Special Tribunal for Lebanon, UN Doc. S/2006/893, 15 November 2006, para. 30 and noting that institutionalisation of the Defence Office serves to ensure equality of arms); accord Swart, supra note 81, note 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, Michael P. and Rassi, Christopher M., ‘Do Former Rogue Leaders Have an International Right to Act as Their Own Lawyers in War Crimes Trials?’, (2004) 20 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution1, 11Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David, The Right to a Fair Trial under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (2001), p. 45
Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary (1993), p. 258
Jørgensen, Nina H.B., ‘The Problem Of Self-Representation at International Criminal Tribunals: Striking a Balance between Fairness and Effectiveness’, (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice64, 67–68 (discussing this case)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomeusz, Lance, ‘The Amicus Curiae Before the International Courts and Tribunals’, (2005) 5 Non-State Actors and International Law211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rodney, Khan, Aga, and May, Richard (eds.), Archbold International Criminal Courts: Practice, Procedure and Evidence (2003), pp. 379–384
Hervé, Ascensio, ‘L’amicus curiae devant les juridictions internationales', (2001) 105 Revue générale de droit international public4Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×