Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-s5lbf Total loading time: 0.288 Render date: 2022-06-25T16:41:30.741Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

12 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Gideon Boas
Monash University, Victoria
James L. Bischoff
U.S. Department of State
Natalie L. Reid
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York
B. Don Taylor III
ICTY, The Hague, The Netherlands
Get access


This volume examines the tangible body of rules and practices applied in the international criminal tribunals during the various steps of an international criminal prosecution: investigation; arrest; detention; charging; disclosure and other pre-trial preparation; guilty pleas; trial; appeal and other post-conviction relief; punishment; and imprisonment. It also reviews other procedures essential to conducting effective investigations and fair and expeditious trials, including rules and practices on admissibility of cases, evidence, and case management; and rules relating to the issuing of orders to states and private individuals; to the assignment of defence counsel and self-representation; the election, appointment, and recusal of judges; victim participation; and reparations.

In considering this vast array of issues, we have endeavoured, first and foremost, to explain the rules of procedure and give examples of how they function in practice. At the same time, we have sought to grapple with some of the more fundamental themes that are intertwined in the legal framework of international criminal procedure, including the ways in which international criminal tribunals and their creators constructed this area of law; how they have shaped its evolution to meet new challenges and changing circumstances; whether this effort has been successful; and whether it has adversely affected other important interests. Many of the rules of international criminal procedure seek a balance between two interests that are frequently in opposition. The international community, and especially victims, demand swift and effective justice for those who are responsible for mass atrocities.

International Criminal Law Practitioner Library
International Criminal Procedure
, pp. 462 - 474
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Kwon, O-Gon, ‘The Challenge of an International Criminal Trial as Seen from the Bench’, (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice360, 364–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston, ‘When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War’, (2006) 59 Vanderbilt Law Review1, 43Google Scholar
Zahar, Alexander, ‘International Court and Private Citizen’, (2009) 12 New Criminal Law Review569, 576Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Future of Legal Accountability’, (2003) ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law195, 196Google Scholar
Hunt, David, ‘The International Criminal Court: High Hopes, “Creative Ambiguity” and an Unfortunate Mistrust in International Judges’, (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice56, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeidy, Mohamed M. El, ‘The Principle of Complementarity: A New Machinery to Implement International Criminal Law’, (2002) 23 Michigan Journal of International Law869, 909–910, 918, 969–970Google Scholar
Turone, Giuliano, ‘Powers and Duties of the Prosecutor’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta, and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Vol. I (2002), p. 1163Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., and Reid, Natalie L., Elements of Crimes Under International Law (2008), pp. 302–303
Schabas, William A., ‘Prosecutorial Discretion v. Judicial Activism at the International Criminal Court’, (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice731, 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, David J., ‘The United States and the International Criminal Court’, (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law12, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, Boon, Kristen, Rübesame, Anne, and Huston, Jonathan, ‘A Response to the American View as Presented by Ruth Wedgwood’, (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law108, 116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats