Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T22:01:44.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Proactive complementarity: a Registrar's perspective and plans

from PART I - General reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Carsten Stahn
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Mohamed M. El Zeidy
Affiliation:
International Criminal Court
Get access

Summary

This contribution highlights the importance of a proactive approach to enhancing the capacity of national jurisdictions to prosecute Rome Statute crimes, an approach which may be named ‘proactive complementarity’. Such an approach facilitates a constructive interplay between national and international jurisdictions. Many players have a responsibility to assist in this process, which is traditionally at the heart of bilateral and multilateral donor activity. The International Criminal Court, with its strictly judicial mandate, can only have a small, lateral role in building national capacities. Nevertheless, each organ of the International Criminal Court can play a role. This chapter sets out a number of creative initiatives that the Registry of the Court can undertake to boost national capacity, focusing on the core Registry competence of organizing and running fair trials.

Introduction

The principle of complementarity is fundamental to the architecture of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and reflects a balance between national sovereignty and the interests of the international community in combating impunity for international crimes. The primacy of national over international jurisdictions has a long history and is one of the cornerstones of state sovereignty. Many of the international conventions that form a basis for international justice, such as the Genocide Convention or the Geneva Conventions, place duties on states and empower them to assert jurisdiction over breaches. Of course, the ad hoc tribunals created by the Security Council were exceptions to this general trend, but they were geographically and time bound, and such primacy was interpreted narrowly by many members of the Security Council. The complementarity regime of the ICC ensured that the many states that wanted to re-affirm the principle of national sovereignty and the corollary primacy of national proceedings would yet be willing to accept the creation of an international jurisdiction to try international crimes under certain conditions.

Type
Chapter
Information
The International Criminal Court and Complementarity
From Theory to Practice
, pp. 52 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhavan, P., ‘The Lord's Resistance Army Case: Uganda's Submission of the First State Referral to the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 99 Am. J Int'l L 403, 413Google Scholar
Burke-White, W. W., ‘Proactive Complementarity: the International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harv. Int'l LJ53Google Scholar
Stahn, C.,‘Complementarity: A Tale of Two Notions’ (2008) 19 Crim. LF87Google Scholar
See Report of the Bureau on Stocktaking: Complementarity, Taking Stock of the Principle of Complementarity: Bridging the Impunity Gap, ICC-ASP/8/51 (18 March 2010)
Almqvist, J., ‘Complementarity and Human Rights: a Litmus Test for the International Criminal Court’ (2008) 30 Loy. LA Int'l and Comp. L Rev. 335, 347–56Google Scholar
Perrin, B., ‘Making Sense of Complementarity: the Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and National Jurisdictions’ (2006) 18 Sri Lanka J Int'l L 301, 318Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×