Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 1.072 Render date: 2021-10-17T20:12:39.070Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Alison Mackey
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbuhl, R. (2018). Research replication. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology (pp. 145162). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbuhl, R., Mackey, A., Ziegler, N., & Amoroso, L. (2018). Interaction and learning grammar. In Liontas, J. I. (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 17). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Á. & Kormos, J. (2004). Creativity and narrative task performance: An exploratory study. Language Learning, 54(2), 277310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Á. & Kormos, J. (2011). Creativity and narrative task performance: An exploratory study. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. (2017). Pragmatic development during study abroad: An analysis of Spanish teenagers’ request strategies in English emails. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwright, R. L. (1984). Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach? The interaction hypothesis. In Singleton, D. M. and Little, D. G. (Eds.), Language Learning in Formal and Informal Contexts (pp. 318). IRAAL.Google Scholar
Allwright, R. L. (1987). Classroom observation: Problems and possibilities. In Das, B. K. (Ed.), Patterns of Classroom Interaction in Southeast Asia (pp. 88102). SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar
Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 477492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ammar, A. & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, E. (2019). Cognitive neuroscience and multilingualism. In Schwieter, J. W. (Ed.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (pp. 1947). John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awwad, A. & Tavakoli, P. (2019). Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A. & García Mayo, M. D. P. (2015). Task-modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 550571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A. & García Mayo, M. D. P. (2016). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21, 480495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Bailey, K. M., Nunan, D., & Swan, M. (Eds.) (1996). Voices From the Language Classroom: Qualitative Research in Second Language Education. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baralt, M. (2015). Working memory capacity, cognitive complexity and L2 recasts in online language teaching. In Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing (pp. 248269). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberena, L. S., Brasil, B. C., Melo, R. M., Mezzomo, C. L., Mota, H. B., & Keske-Soares, M. (2014). Ultrasound applicability in speech language pathology and audiology. CoDAS, 26(6), 520530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. P., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning Research. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57, 278287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, P. (2015). Commenting to learn: Evidence of language and intercultural learning in comments on YouTube videos. Language Learning and Technology, 19(3), 8899.Google Scholar
Beretta, A. & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39(2), 121127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Kroll, J. F., Green, D. W., MacWhinney, B., & Craik, F. I. (2015). Publication bias and the validity of evidence: What’s the connection? Psychological Science, 26(6), 944946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, D. (2000). Problematizing interview data: Voices in the mind’s machine? TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 757763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2010). Researching language and identity. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 337349). Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1982). Learning to say what you mean in a second language: A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 3, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K. (1990). Structure in language: Creating form in talk. American Psychologist, 45(11), 12211236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K. (1995). Sentence production: From mind to mouth. In Miller, J. L. & Eimas, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language, and Communication (2nd ed., pp. 181216). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bock, K. & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis [computer software]. Biostat.Google Scholar
Bowles, M. (2010). Features that make a task amenable to think-aloud: A meta-analysis of studies investigating the validity of think-alouds on verbal tasks. In The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research (pp. 67112). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436458. 10.1177/1362168814563200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruer, J. T. (2006). Points of view: On the implications of neuroscience research for science teaching and learning: Are there any? A skeptical theme and variations: The primacy of psychology in the science of learning. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 5(2), 104110. DOI:10.1187/cbe.06-03-0153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunfaut, T. & Révész, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 141168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryfonski, L. (2019a). “Is seeing believing? The role of ultrasound tongue imaging and oral corrective feedback in L2 pronunciation development,” unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bryfonski, L. (2019b). Task-based teacher training: Implementation and evaluation in Central American bilingual schools(Publication No. 13811093), [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Bryfonski, L. & Ma, X. (2019). Effects of implicit versus explicit feedback on Mandarin tone acquisition in a SCMC learning environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–28.Google Scholar
Bryfonski, L. & McKay, T. (2017). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 1–30.Google Scholar
Bryfonski, L. & Sanz, C. (2018). Opportunities for corrective feedback during study abroad: A mixed methods approach. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing (pp. 2348). Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (Ed.) (2015). Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A Decade of Plenaries from the International Conference. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2015). Task‐based language teaching. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Calvert, M. & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 357386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (2000). Contrasting approaches to classroom research: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of language use and learning. Second Language Studies, 19, 156.Google Scholar
Cleophas, T. & Zwinderman, A. (2017). Modern Meta-Analysis Review and Update of Methodologies. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of task-based interaction in form-focused instruction of adult learners in foreign and second language teaching [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of San Francisco.Google Scholar
Coderre, E. L., Smith, J. F., Van Heuven, W. J., and Horwitz, B. (2016). The functional overlap of executive control and language processing in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 471488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, C. and Davidson, P. (2015). Constructing questionnaires. In Brown, J. D. and Coombe, C. A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Research in Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 217223). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. (2017). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-By-Step Approach (5th ed.). SAGE.Google Scholar
Cornillie, F., Van Den Noortgate, W., Van den Branden, K., & Desmet, P. (2017). Examining focused L2 practice: From in vitro to in vivo. Language Learning and Technology, 21(1), 121145.Google Scholar
Cowan, N., Towse, J. N., Hamilton, Z., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., Lacey, J. F., Moreno, M. V., & Hitch, G. J. (2003). Children’s working-memory processes: A response-timing analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 113132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. In Bergman, M. (Ed.), Advances in Mixed Methods Research (pp. 6684). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teaching: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14, 130142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N. (2018). Second Language Pragmatics: From Theory to Research. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. and Case, R. (1981). Syntactic form, semantic complexity, and short-term memory: Influences on children’s acquisition of new linguistic structures. Developmental Psychology, 17(4), 367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bruin, A., Treccani, B., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias? Psychological Science, 26(1), 99107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewey, D., Belnap, R., & Steffen, P. (2018). Anxiety: Stress, foreign language classroom anxiety, and enjoyment during study abroad in Amman, Jordan. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 140161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research Construction, Administration, and Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Csizér, K. (2012). How to design and analyze surveys in second language acquisition research. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M.. (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide (pp. 7494). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Skehan, P. (2005). Individual differences in L2 learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 589630). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (2018). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69, 101126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., Bunting, M. F., Campbell, S. G., Bowles, A. R., & Haarmann, H. (2007). The development of the High-Level Language Aptitude Battery. Center for Advanced Study of Language Technical Report (TTO 2105 M. 4). University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus-on-form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 114138). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2012). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 410426). Routledge.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Beatty‐Martínez, A. L., & Johns, M. A. (2019). What language experience tells us about cognition: Variable input and interactional contexts affect bilingual sentence processing. In Schwieter, J. W. (Ed.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (pp. 467484). John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. W. F. (1972). Likelihood: An Account of the Statistical Concept of Likelihood and Its Application to Scientific Inference. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT journal, 63(2), 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2018). Taking the critics to task: The case for task-based teaching. In Walker, I., Chan, D., Nagami, M., & Bourguignon, C. (Eds.), New Perspectives on the Development of Communicative and Related Competence in Foreign Language Education (pp. 103117). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, M. (2014). Secret military test, coming soon to your Spanish class: A powerful, precise language aptitude test is entering civilian life. Nautilus, 12. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QHYCDDGoogle Scholar
Fabre, D., Hueber, T., Girin, L., Alameda-Pineda, X., & Badin, P. (2017). Automatic animation of an articulatory tongue model from ultrasound images of the vocal tract. Speech Communication, 93, 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M. & Morgan-Short, K. (2018a). Contributions of initial proficiency and language use to second-language development during study abroad: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence. In Sanz, C. & Morales-Front, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Study Abroad Research and Practice (pp. 421435). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M. & Morgan-Short, K. (2018b). The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development. Second Language Research, 34(1), 67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetters, M. D. & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2019). A checklist of mixed methods elements in a submission for advancing the methodology of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 414423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortune, T. & Ju, Z. (2017). Assessing and exploring the oral proficiency of young Mandarin immersion learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 264287. 10.1017/S0267190517000150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21(2), 175198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuya, Y. J. & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts of EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies, 21(1), 147.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. D. P. & Alcón Soler, E. (2013). Negotiated input and output / interaction. In Herschensohn, J. & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 209229). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. D. P. & Labandibar, U. (2017). The use of models as written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 110127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. (2010). Interactionist perspectives on second language acquisition. In Kaplan, R. B. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 217231). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. (2017). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., Behney, J. N., & Uzum, B. (2013). Inhibitory control, working memory, and L2 interaction. In Droździał-Szelest, K. & Pawlak, M. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 91114). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2005). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction, and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19(1), 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 180206). Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2017). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Applied Linguistics and L2 Research. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Varonis, E. M. (1989). Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In Eisenstein, M. (Ed.), Variation and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 7186). Springer.Google Scholar
Gick, B., Bernhardt, B., Bacsfalvi, P., & Wilson, I. (2008). Ultrasound imaging applications in second language acquisition. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 315328). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. (2019). Eye Tracking in Second Language Acquisition: A Research Synthesis and Methodological Guide. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, J. (2018). Linking cognition and emotion: An appraisal study of foreign language teacher anxiety [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013a). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013b). The case for methodological rigor: A Response to Lyster and Ranta. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), E1. 10.1017/S0272263113000028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, C. (2012). Beyond the observer’s paradox: The audio-recorder as a resource for the display of identity. Qualitative Research, 13(4), 299317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory‐based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal‐F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., & Stewart, G. (2018). Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature, 555(7695), 175182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016a). Factors influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback decisions. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1) 255275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016b). Spanish instructors’ operationalization and interpretation of task complexity and sequencing in non-experimental foreign language lessons. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 467486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. & Plonsky, L. (2017). Look who’s interacting: A scoping review of research involving non-teacher/non-peer interlocutors. In Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (Ed.), Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach: Investigating Learners, Instructors, and Other Interlocutors (pp. 305324). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M. & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashemi, M. & Babii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanzadeh, M., Marefat, F., & Ramezani, A. (2019). The impact of single versus multiple recasts on L2 learners’ implicit and explicit knowledge. Heliyon, 5(5), e01748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (Ed.) (2011). Research Methods in Child Language: A Practical Guide. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 539588). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Indrarathne, B. & Kormos, J. (2018). The role of working memory in processing L2 input: Insights from eye-tracking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 355374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. & Zyzik, E. (2014). Judgment and interpretation tasks in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 3764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. O. & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, E., Wagner, M., & Park, G. (2014). Mixed methods research in language testing and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 123153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J. & VanPatten, B. (2013). Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Wakusawa, K., Horie, K., Sato, S., & Kawashima, R. (2010). Learning second language vocabulary: Neural dissociation of situation-based learning and text-based learning. Neuroimage, 50(2), 802809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Suzuki, W., Sassa, Y., Hashizume, H., & Kawashima, R. (2016). Neural correlates of second-language communication and the effect of language anxiety. Neuropsychologia, 84, e2e12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing, and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2), 199225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartchava, E. (2016). Learners’ beliefs about corrective feedback in the language classroom: Perspectives from two international contexts. TESL Canada Journal, 33(2), 1945. 1018806/tesl.v33i2.1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. N. & Hussey, K. A. (2011). Psycholinguistics. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 271278). Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 91131). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory: L2 question development through recasts in a laboratory setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task‐based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, K. & Bigelow, M. (2018). East African transnational adolescents and cross-border education: An argument for local international learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 187193. 10.1017/S0267190518000041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, K. & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Supp. 1), 209227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C. & Wu, Q. (2018). Learning Chinese through contextualized language practices in study abroad residence halls: Two case studies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 102121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 405415.Google Scholar
Kirkham, S. & Mackey, A. (2015). Research, relationships, and reflexivity: Two case studies of language and identity. Ethics In Applied Linguistics Research (pp. 103120). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1977). Some issues relating to the monitor model. In Brown, H., Yorio, C., & Crymes, R. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning English As a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice (pp. 144158). TESOL.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1980). The input hypothesis. In Alatis, J. (Ed.), Current Issues in Bilingual Education (pp. 168180). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1, 97120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J., Thorne, S. L., & Poehler, M. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 207226). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Tedick, D. J. (2016). World language teaching: Thinking differently. In Gitomer, D. & Bell, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (5th ed., pp. 13351388). American Educational Research Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, K. R. (2016). Psychology, replication, and beyond. BMC Psychology, 4(30), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. (2018). Task complexity, cognitive load, and L1 speech. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 506539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, V. & Gyogi, E. (2015). The reflective learning journal in the classroom, [Paper presentation]. Annual International Conference on Language Teaching and Learning and Educational Materials Exhibition, Shizuoka City, Japan.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. & Donatelli, L. (2017). The role of (un)awareness in SLA. Language Teaching, 50(2), 189211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 429448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(4), 861883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis. Sage.Google Scholar
Llinares, A. & Lyster, R. (2014). The influence of context on patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake: A comparison of CLIL and immersion classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 181194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1980). Input and interaction in second language acquisition [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259278. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second-language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 377393). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413468). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In Lambert, R. & Shohamy, E. (Eds.), Language Policy and Pedagogy: Essays in Honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179192). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Non-issues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task‐based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., Lee, J., & Hillman, K. (2019). Task-based language learning. In Malovrh, P. & Benati, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (pp. 500527). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 1541). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J. (2012). Event-related potentials. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D., & Sher, K. J. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 523546). American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luque, A., Mizyed, N., & Morgan-Short, K. (2018). Event-related potentials reveal evidence for syntactic co-activation in bilingual language processing: A replication of Sanoudaki and Thierry. In López, L. (Ed.), Code-Switching–Experimental Answers to Theoretical Questions: In Honor of Kay González-Vilbazo (pp. 177194). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error type and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(Suppl. 1), 183218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 5181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (2019). Roles for corrective feedback in second language instruction. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 3766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167184. 10.1017/S027226311200071XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012a). Input, Interaction, and Corrective Feedback in L2 Learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012b). Why (or why not), when, and how to replicate research. In Porte, G. (Ed.), Replication Research in Applied Linguistics, 3469. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2016). Practice and progression in second language research methods. AILA Review, 27, 8097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. M. (2012). Interactionist approaches. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 723). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60(3), 501533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (1st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2015). Interaction approaches. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 180207). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.) (2012). Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive implicit negative feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp. 407452). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2012). Interaction approach in second language acquisition. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 27482758). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., McDonough, K., Fujii, A., & Tatasumi, T. (2001). Investigating learners’ reports about the L2 classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(4), 285308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Park, H. I., Akiyama, Y., & Pipes, A. (2014, March). The role of cognitive creativity in L2 learning processes, [Paper presentation]. Georgetown University Round Table, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 181209). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J. & Teimouri, Y. (2015, September). The relationships amongst working memory, cognitive creativity and second language production during communicative tasks. Task-Based Language Teaching Conference. Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Sachs, R. (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62(3), 704740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W., Sheng, L., & Morgan, G. (2016). Lexical‐semantic organization in bilingually developing deaf children with ASL‐dominant language exposure: Evidence from a repeated meaning association task. Language Learning, 66(4), 872899. 10.1111/lang.12169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. (2017). Are replication studies possible in qualitative second/foreign language classroom research? A call for comparative re-production research. Language Teaching, 50(3), 367383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E. & Mackey, A. (2014). IRIS: A new resource for second language research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(1), 125130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research Into Second Languages (pp. 121). Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68(2), 321391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathôt, S. (2018). Pupillometry: Psychology, physiology, and function. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonough, K., Crawford, W. J., & Mackey, A. (2015). Creativity and EFL students’ language use during a group problem-solving task. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 188199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56(4), 693720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (2013). Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using Priming Methods in Second Language Research. Routledge.Google Scholar
McKinnon, S. (2017). TBLT instructional effects on tonal alignment and pitch range in L2 Spanish imperatives versus declaratives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 287317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. Lognostics.Google Scholar
Menon, V. & Muraleedharan, A. (2016). Salami slicing of data sets: What the young researcher needs to know. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 38(6), 577578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. C. (2003). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: A meta-analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Purdue University.Google Scholar
Miller, P. C. & Pan, W. (2012). Recasts in the L2 classroom: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 4859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A. & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention (pp. 339364). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mohades, S. G., Struys, E., Van Schuerbeek, P., Baeken, C., Van De Craen, P., & Luypaert, R. (2014). Age of second language acquisition affects nonverbal conflict processing in children: An fMRI study. Brain and Behavior, 4(5), 626642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Deng, Z., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Wong, P. C., & Wong, F. C. (2015). A view of the neural representation of second language syntax through artificial language learning under implicit contexts of exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 383419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Bartlett-Hsu, L. (2015). Contributions of event-related potential research to issues in explicit and implicit second language acquisition. In Rebuschat, P. (Ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages (pp. 349384). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouthon, M., Khateb, A., Lazeyras, F., Pegna, A. J., Lee-Jahnke, H., Lehr, C., & Annoni, J. M. (2019). Second-language proficiency modulates the brain language control network in bilingual translators: An event-related fMRI study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–14.Google Scholar
Nakatsukasa, K. (2016). Efficacy of recasts and gestures on the acquisition of locative prepositions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 771779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article: Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 535562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 353368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of recasts versus prompts on immediate uptake and learning of a complex target structure. In DeKeyser, R. M. & Botana, G. P. (Eds.), Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom: Reconciling Methodological Demands and Pedagogical Applicability (pp. 107126). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (Eds.) (2017). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning: Research, Theory, Applications, Implications. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (Eds.) (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicklin, C. & Plonsky, L. (2020). Outliers in L2 research: A synthesis and data re-analysis from self-paced reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2012). Meta‐analysis. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 110). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., & Bonk, W. (2002). Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 395418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.) (2006). Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A. & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. (1993). Action research in language education. In Edge, J. & Richards, K. (Eds.), Teachers Develop, Teachers Research: Papers on Classroom Research and Teacher Development (pp. 3950). Heinemann International.Google Scholar
Oakley, M. (2019, October). Ultrasound tongue imaging and the acquisition of the French /y/–/u/ contrast, [Paper presentation]. Second Language Research Forum, Montréal, Québec.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L. & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second language acquisition research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottó, I. (1998). The relationship between individual differences in learner creativity and language learning success. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 763773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, M. T. & Tanner, K. D. (2017). Teaching as brain changing: Exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 16(2). 10.1187/cbe.17-01-0005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, K. (2016). Employing TBLT at a military-service academy in Korea: Learners’ reactions to and necessary adaptation of TBLT. English Teaching, 71(4).Google Scholar
Pandža, N., Karuzis, V., Phillips, I., O’Rourke, P., & Kuchinsky, S. (2020). Neurostimulation and pupillometry: New directions for learning and research in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40.Google Scholar
Parlak, Ö. & Ziegler, N. (2017). The impact of recasts on the development of primary stress in a synchronous computer-mediated environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 257285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds.) (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99126. 10.1017/S0272263103000044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2013). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice (pp. 934). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427459. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). Harcourt Brace Jovanich.Google Scholar
Pipes, A. (2017, July). Examining cognitive creativity as an interlocutor individual difference [Paper presentation]. AILA Research Network on Interlocutor and Instructor Individual Differences in Cognition and SLA Symposium, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Pipes, A. (2019). Examining creativity as an individual difference in second language production [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Pliatsikas, C. & Luk, G. (2016). Executive control in bilinguals: A concise review on fMRI studies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(4), 699705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 9931038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2015). Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics. CALICO Journal, 32(2), 232244.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2016, February). The N crowd: Sampling practices, internal validity, and generalizability in L2 research, [Conference presentation] University College London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods in instructed SLA. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 505521). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31(2), 267278. 10.1177/0267658314536436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61(2), 325366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Han, S. (in preparation). Meta-analysis in language testing: A second order review and call for future research. Retrieved from https://lukeplonsky.wordpress.com/projects/Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 7397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L. (2012). How to do a meta-analysis. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide (pp. 275295). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research (pp. 106128). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G. (2012). Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porte, G. & McManus, K. (2019). Doing Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Préfontaine, Y. & Kormos, J. (2015). The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 96112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, M. S. & Rock, T. (2017). Action Research: Using Strategic Inquiry to Improve Teaching and Learning. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Qureshi, M. (2016). A meta-analysis: Age and second language grammar acquisition. System, 60, 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiterer, S. (Ed.) (2018). Exploring Language Aptitude: Views from Psychology, The Language Sciences, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A. & Brunfaut, T. (2013). Text characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 3165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A. & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Teachers’ perspectives on second language task difficulty: Insights from think-alouds and eye tracking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 182204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riazi, A. M. (2016). Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riazi, A. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in Language Teaching and Learning. Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M. & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues, and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 114127). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 4673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake, and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 193213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. & Gilabert, R. (2012). Task‐based learning: Cognitive underpinnings. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 247267). Routledge.Google Scholar
Roothooft, H. (2014). The relationship between adult EFL teachers’ oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System, 46(1), 6579. 10.1016/j.system.2014.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1979). File drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.) (2005). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment, and Adjustments. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 133164). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sachs, R. & Suh, B‐R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer‐mediated interaction. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp. 199227). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-driven recasts and working memory on L2 development. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Series of Empirical Studies (pp. 229248). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2019). Corrective feedback and the development of L2 pronunciation. In Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Macmillan, K., Mai, T., Suzukida, Y., Sun, H., Magne, V., Ilkan, M. & Murakami, A. (2020). Open source: Developing, analyzing, and sharing multivariate datasets: Individual differences in L2 learning revisited. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40.Google Scholar
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing (pp. 119140). Longman.Google Scholar
Sasayama, S., Malicka, A., & Norris, J. M. (2015). Primary challenges in cognitive task complexity research: Results of a comprehensive research synthesis, [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Sato, R. (2016). Examining high-intermediate Japanese EFL learners’ perception of recasts: Revisiting repair, acknowledgement, and noticing through stimulated recall. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 18, 109129.Google Scholar
Sato, M. & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 , 591626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, J. (2018). Pupillometry in linguistics research: An introduction and review for second language researchers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 529549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2010). Introduction: The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L. & Jackson, C. N. (2015). Teacher vs. peer oral corrective feedback in the German language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 48(4), 688705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 3862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Language aptitude. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 381395). Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2012). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning and Technology, 16(3), 5381.Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T. D., Carter, E. C., & Doucouliagos, H. (2018). What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 13251346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Süß, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30(3), 261288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook on Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 471484). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 285304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydorenko, T. (2015). The use of computer-delivered structured tasks in pragmatic instruction: An exploratory study. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(3), 333362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. (2014). TBLT and synthetic immersive environments: What can in-game task restarts tell us about design and implementation? In González-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Technology-Mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks (pp. 149182). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szucs, D. & Ioannidis, J. (2017). When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: A reassessment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tagarelli, K. (2014). The neurocognition of adult second language learning: An fMRI study [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. At this permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/712460.Google Scholar
Tannen, D., Kendall, S., & Gordon, C. (Eds.) (2007). Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (2010). Second language acquisition by low-literate learners: An under-studied population. Language Teaching, 43(1), 7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. & Bigelow, M. (2005). Impact of literacy on oral language processing: Implications for second language acquisition research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 7779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A. & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tateishi, M. & Winters, S. (2013, June). “Does ultrasound training lead to improved perception of a non-native sound contrast? Evidence from Japanese learners of English,” in Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–15.Google Scholar
Teimouri, Y. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 681709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teimouri, Y. (2018). Differential roles of shame and guilt in L2 learning: How bad is bad? The Modern Language Journal, 102(4), 632652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. S. (2013). The interface of language aptitude and multilingualism: Reconsidering the bilingual/multilingual dichotomy. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 685701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson Hernández, R. & Subtirelu, N. (2018, March). Everyday experiences of policy: Exploring the appropriation of educational language policy through teachers’ narratives, [Unpublished paper presentation]. Georgetown University Round Table, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N. & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toivo, W. & Scheepers, C. (2019). Pupillary responses to affective words in bilinguals’ first versus second language. PLoS ONE, 14(4), e0210450. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrance, E. (1970). Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom. William C. Brown.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Series of Empirical Studies (pp. 171195). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., McDonough, K., & Neumann, H. (2013). Using collaborative tasks to elicit auditory and structural priming. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 177186. 10.1002/tesq.78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, H. M. L. (2012). Ultrasound speech training for Japanese adults learning English as a second language, [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Van Avermaet, P. & Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.), Task-Based Language Education: From Theory to Practice (pp. 4661). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.) (2006). Task-Based Language Education: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. (Eds.). (2009). Task-Based Language Teaching: A Reader. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wang, W. & Loewen, S. (2016). Nonverbal behavior and corrective feedback in nine ESL university-level classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 459478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working Memory and Second Language Learning: Towards an Integrated Approach. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Language Teaching, 50(1), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53(1), 67121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. & Menard-Warwick, J. (2014). Qualitative research interviews in second language acquisition. In Chappelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 15). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. (2018). Aptitude testing. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Godfroid, A., & Gass, S. M. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Eye-movement recordings in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 205212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. M. & Teng, C. (2010). Using task-based pragmatics tutorials while studying abroad in China. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 363399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. & Granena, G. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism, 19(1), 147161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. & Sağdıç, A. (2019). The interaction between inhibitory control and corrective feedback timing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(2), 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youn, S. (2020). Interactional features of L2 pragmatic interaction in role‐play speaking assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for Second Language Education: A Coursebook. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Zalbidea, J. (2017). “One task fits all”? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553586. 10.1017/S027226311500025XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, N., Seals, C., Ammons, S., Lake, J., Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2013). Interaction in conversation groups: The development of L2 conversational styles. In McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts (pp. 269292). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar