Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-t82dr Total loading time: 0.267 Render date: 2021-11-27T14:43:00.078Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

5 - Judicial Accountability

from PART II - A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2019

Arghya Sengupta
Affiliation:
Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
Get access

Summary

ACCOUNTABILITY: A VERY BRIEF CONCEPTUAL OVERVIEW

The advent of judicial accountability as a widespread phenomenon is a relatively modern development. It grew as an institutional response to the growing power of courts in adjudicating matters that were hitherto not considered within the ambit of judicial resolution. Its intellectual progenitor, from which it derived both its terminology and its conceptual moorings, is the concept of public accountability, which itself underwent a new wave in the latter half of the twentieth century. Previously, public accountability was an under-theorised and seldom discussed concept. In democratic theory, it had a settled meaning, applicable to elected representatives, who had to be accountable to their constituents; in public administration, it denoted a traditional book-keeping function, true to its etymological roots. However, caught at the confluence of the twin developments of the multiplication of power centres within the state requiring multiple sites of accountability and theories of New Public Management redefining traditional public administration understandings, the concept of public accountability exploded, suddenly being used in a variety of ways, with multiple meanings and diverse objectives.

To document and analyse each of these meanings and objectives is the task of an accountability historian and beyond the scope of this chapter. I am concerned with the limited task of sifting through these multiple understandings in order to delineate a plausible conceptual core of judicial accountability. This conceptual account is bolstered by jurisdiction-specific examples that demonstrate the various ways in which judicial accountability is used in practice. Such an account will provide a matrix to understand the particular dimensions of judicial accountability which are, much to our intellectual detriment, significantly under-theorised today.

Two parallel developments in governance and public administration are responsible for the profusion of the uses of public accountability in the latter half of the twentieth century. In governance, there was an increasing realisation that the traditional conception of public accountability of elected representatives, that is, ministerial responsibility to parliament in the Westminster tradition, was inadequate for a number of reasons. Thus, direct bureaucratic accountability to parliament, administrative accountability to courts and accountability of various governmental authorities directly to the people were offered as necessary supplements.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Judicial Accountability
  • Arghya Sengupta
  • Book: Independence and Accountability of the Higher Indian Judiciary
  • Online publication: 26 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108757577.005
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Judicial Accountability
  • Arghya Sengupta
  • Book: Independence and Accountability of the Higher Indian Judiciary
  • Online publication: 26 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108757577.005
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Judicial Accountability
  • Arghya Sengupta
  • Book: Independence and Accountability of the Higher Indian Judiciary
  • Online publication: 26 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108757577.005
Available formats
×