Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4hcbs Total loading time: 0.216 Render date: 2021-12-08T07:54:56.583Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

1 - Implicit Racial Bias

A Social Science Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Justin D. Levinson
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, School of Law
Robert J. Smith
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, School of Law
Get access

Summary

A little after 2:00 a.m. on the first day of 2009, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Officer Johannes Mehserle arrived at the Fruitvale BART station after receiving reports of a fight on a train. On arrival, he was directed by another officer to arrest Oscar Grant, who, along with other fight suspects, was sitting on the ground next to the wall of the station. As Mehserle, who was joined by other officers, prepared to arrest Grant, Grant began to stand up, and Mehserle forced him to the ground face first. Another officer stood over Grant and uttered, “Bitch-ass n-.” As Mehserle attempted to handcuff Grant, some eyewitnesses testified that Grant resisted by keeping his hands under his torso. Although Grant was lying face down and was physically restrained by another police officer at the time of his alleged resistance, Mehserle removed his department-issued handgun from its holster and shot Grant in the back from point-blank range. Grant died later that morning.

At trial, the jury convicted Mehserle of involuntary manslaughter, but acquitted him of more serious homicide charges that would have treated the killing as intentional. The involuntary manslaughter conviction indicates that the jury likely believed two key pieces of Mehserle's testimony: first, that he thought Grant was reaching for a gun, and second, that he mistook his own gun (which was on the right side of his body and weighed twice as much) for a Tazer (on the left side of his body). How could an officer possibly perceive a mostly compliant, restrained man as a gun-toting threat?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2010
Matier, PhilipRoss, Andrew 2009
Bargh, John A.Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action 71 1996
Levinson, JustinForgotten Racial Equality: Implicit Bias, Decisionmaking, and Misremembering 57 2007
Levinson, Justin D.Race, Death and the Complicitous Mind 58 2009
Gilbert, Daniel T.Hixon, J. GregoryThe Trouble of Thinking: Activation and Application of Stereotypic Beliefs 60 1991
Rudman, Laurie A.Lee, Matthew R.Implicit and Explicit Consequences of Exposure to Violent and Misogynous Rap Music 5 138 2002
Eberhardt, Jennifer L.Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing 87 2004
Payne, B. KeithPrejudice and Perception: The Role of Automatic and Controlled Processes in Misperceiving a Weapon 81 185 2001
Devine, Patricia G.Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components 56 1989
Brigham, J. C.Ethnic Stereotypes 76 1971
Johnson, James D.Trawalter, SophieConverging Interracial Consequences of Exposure to Violent Rap Music on Stereotypical Attributions of Blacks 36 2000
Steele, Claude M.Aronson, JoshuaStereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African-Americans 69 1995
Shih, MargaretStereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance 10 1999
Correll, JoshuaThe Police Officer's Dilemma: Using Ethnicity to Disambiguate Potentially Threatening Individuals 83 2002
Correll, JoshuaAcross the Thin Blue Line: Police Officers and Racial Bias in the Decision to Shoot 92 2007
Correll, JoshuaEvent-Related Potentials and the Decision to Shoot: The Role of Threat Perception and Cognitive Control 42 2006
Dasgupta, NilanjanaGreenwald, Anthony G.On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals 81 2001
Rudman, Laurie A.Ashmore, Richard D.Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test 10 2007
Greenwald, Anthony 2009
Nosek, BrianPervasiveness and Correlates of Implicit Attitudes and Stereotypes 18 2008
Levinson, Justin D.Young, DanielleImplicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study 18 2010
Devine, Patricia G.Implicit Prejudice and Stereotyping: How Automatic Are They? Introduction to the Special Section 81 2001
Fazio, Russell H.Olson, Michael A.Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meanings and Use 54 2003
Hofmann, WilhelmA Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures 31 2005
Mitchell, GregoryTetlock, Philip E.Antidiscrimination Law and the Perils of Mindreading 67 2006
Bagenstos, Samuel R.Implicit Bias, “Science,” and Antidiscrimination Law 1 2007
Jost, John T.The Existence of Implicit Bias Is Beyond Reasonable Doubt: A Refutation of Ideological and Methodological Objections and Executive Summary of Ten Studies that No Manager Should Ignore 29 2009
Gonsalkorale, KarenAging and Prejudice: Diminished Regulation of Automatic Race Bias Among Older Adults 45 2009
Green, Alexander R.Implicit Bias Among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients 22 2007
Rooth, Dan-OlofAutomatic Associations and Discrimination in Hiring: Real World Evidence, 17 2010
Eisenberg, TheodoreJohnson, Sheri LynnImplicit Racial Attitudes of Death Penalty Lawyers 53 2004
Levinson, Justin D.Suppressing the Expression of Community Values in Jurors: How “Legal Priming” Systematically Alters the Way People Think 73 2005
Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.Does Unconscious Bias Affect Trial Judges? 84 2009
Levinson, Justin D.Young, DanielleDifferent Shades of Bias: Skin Tone, Implicit Racial Bias, and Judgments of Ambiguous Evidence 112 2010
Levinson, Justin D.Cai, HuajianYoung, DanielleGuilty by Implicit Bias: The Guilty-Not Guilty Implicit Association Test 8 2010
Kang, JerryAre Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness 7 2010
Young, DanielleLevinson, Justin D.Sinnett, Scott 2011
1
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×