Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T12:43:18.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Love and recognition in Fichte and the alternative position of de Beauvoir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Marion Heinz
Affiliation:
University of Siegen
Nicholas Boyle
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Disley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
John Walker
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The philosophical theories which are generally characterised by the name of ‘German Idealism’ are united in the task of overcoming the dualisms of Kant's critical philosophy – the oppositions of subject and object, theoretical and practical philosophy, mundus sensibilis and mundus intelligibilis – and thus furnishing a complete system of philosophy. These theories also share the idea that the principle underlying the entire system of philosophy must be developed in a way that preserves Kant's insight that the ‘I think’ is the highest point of reference for logic as a whole and indeed for transcendental philosophy itself. But whereas Kant's doctrine of the analytic and synthetic unity of apperception serves to ground theoretical philosophy alone, these Idealist thinkers seek to ground philosophy in its entirety upon a principle – a single principle – that exhibits the character of subjectivity, that is, of self-relating activity. This programme for a monistic philosophy of subjectivity also provides the foundation for the theories of recognition that were developed by the philosophers of German Idealism. Fichte first introduced the notion of ‘recognition’ as the fundamental concept of social philosophy and the philosophy of right in his 1796 text Foundations of Natural Right according to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, and Hegel would present the most prominent and influential conception of recognition in his Phenomenology of Spirit of 1807, but in spite of the different philosophical foundations developed in each case both thinkers agree that it is impossible to realise the true or actual self-consciousness of finite rational beings by starting from the basis of a solus ipse, and that, on the contrary, it is one's consciousness of other individuals, standing in a relationship of mutual recognition, which furnishes the indispensable presupposition for such self-consciousness. This connection between the theory of subjectivity and that of intersubjectivity, so characteristic of the post-Kantian attempts to ground philosophy as system, reframes the field of practical philosophy – at least in Fichte's case – in comparison both to Kant and to the Enlightenment tradition of natural law theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Impact of Idealism
The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought
, pp. 277 - 299
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kant, Immanuel, Werke in sechs Bänden, ed. Wilhelm Weischedel (Wiesbaden: Insel, 1956–62), viii, 390Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G., ‘Einleitungsvorlesungen in die Wissenschaftslehre’ (1813), in Fichtes Werke, 11 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1971), ix, 1–102Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig, Praktische Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992), 67Google Scholar
J. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, ed. Lauth, R. and Jacob, H., vol. i/3 (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1966), 313–460
Foundations of Natural Right, ed. and trans. Neuhouser, Frederick and Baur, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Arbeit und Interaktion. Bemerkungen zu Hegels Jenenser Philosophie des Geistes’ in Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968)Google Scholar
Doyé, Sabine, ‘Einleitung’, in Marion Heinz and Sabine Doyé (eds.), Geschlechterordnung und Staat: Legitimationsfiguren der politischen Philosophie (1600–1850) (Berlin: Akademie, 2012)Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion, ‘Das Gegenverhältnis der Geschlechter: zur Geschlechtertheorie des vorkritischen Kant’, in J. Hoffmann and A. Pumberger (eds.), Geschlecht-Ordnung-Wissen: Festschrift für Friederike Hassauer zum 60. Geburtstag (Vienna: Praesens, 2011)Google Scholar
Horn, Adam, Immanuel Kants ethisch-rechtliche Eheauffassung, ed. M. Kleinschneider, with an afterword by Hariolf Oberer (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1991)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysics of Morals, introduction by Roger Sullivan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuster, Friederike, ‘Kontroverse Heterosexualität’, in S. Doyé, M. Heinz and F. Kuster (eds.), Philosophische Geschlechtertheorien: ausgewählte Texte von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2002)Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile, or On Education, trans. Allan Bloom (New York: Basic Books, 1995), 357Google Scholar
Binkelmann, Christoph, Theorie der praktischen Freiheit. Fichte – Hegel (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2007), 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel, ‘Die transzendentale Notwendigkeit von Intersubjektivität’, in Jean-Christophe Merle (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts, Klassiker Auslegen 24 (Berlin: Akademie, 2001), 63–80Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Das System der Sittenlehre nach den Principien der Wissenschafts-lehre, in J. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, ed. R. Lauth and H. Gliwitzky, vol. i/5 (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1977), 1–317Google Scholar
Rohs, Peter, Johann Gottlieb Fichte (Munich: Beck, 1991)Google Scholar
Buchholz, Stephan, ‘ Recht, Religion und Ehe: Orientierungswandel und gelehrte Kontroversen im Übergang vom 17. zum 18. Jahrhundert’, Ius Commune, special volume 36 (Frankfurt am Main: Max-Planck-Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte, 1988), 424f., 432f.Google Scholar
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, trans. Borde, Constance and Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila (London: Jonathan Cape, 2009), 293.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Phänomenologie des Geistes, in Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michel, 20 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1969–71), iii, 145ffGoogle Scholar
Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), 111ff

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×