Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T08:41:41.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - German Idealism and Marx

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Douglas Moggach
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Nicholas Boyle
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Disley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
John Walker
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

The concept of labour provides a key to understanding Marx's complex relations to his German Idealist precursors. Through it, he appropriates and transforms the Idealist concept of spontaneity, develops his critique of heteronomy and alienation under capitalism, and envisages the attainment of genuine autonomy in socialism. We can thus connect Marx with Hegel, but also more broadly to German thought since Kant, indeed since Leibniz.

The Left Hegelian programme

In the works of Kant, Fichte, Schiller and Hegel, the effects of the European Enlightenment and indigenous theoretical traditions stemming from Leibniz were distilled into a philosophical revolution, elaborating new conceptions of theoretical and practical reason and of reason's legislative authority in morality and politics. The essence of this revolution was an engagement with modern society: an extended reflection on individuality, autonomy and freedom. The fundamental issue of German Idealism is not to impugn the external world, but to ask how we can rationally and freely relate to it, and act in it. A resolute yet critical modernism imbues German Idealism with its particular characteristics: for all its inner divergences, it is a practical idealistic approach, a brilliant vindication of freedom. It develops ideas of practical reason as the capacity to be self-legislating and autonomous, and it stresses the self-causing, spontaneous quality of human action. The world as it appears to the senses is not metaphysically unreal or illusory, but derivative; German Idealism directs our attention to the formative activity which underlies the objects of experience, and to processes of subjective self-shaping.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Impact of Idealism
The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought
, pp. 82 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pippin, Robert, Hegel's Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen W., trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) (hereafter PR), 20Google Scholar
Mayer, Gustav, ‘Die Anfänge des politischen Radikalismus im vormärzlichen Preußen’, Zeitschrift für Politik (1913), no. 1, repr., 51
D’Hondt, Jacques, Hegel en son temps (Paris: Éditions Sociales, 1968)Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas (ed.), The New Hegelians: politics and philosophy in the Hegelian school (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Eduard, Rückblicke auf Personen und Zustände (1836), ed. Waszek, N. (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1995), 91–101Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus, 20 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1969–71), (hereafter HW), xx, 332–3Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘An answer to the question: what is enlightenment?’ (1784), in Kant's Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 54–60Google Scholar
Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998) (hereafter CPR), 4–5 n. 1 (p. Axi)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helvétius, Claude Adrien, De l'esprit (Paris, 1759)Google Scholar
d’Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry, Système de la nature ou des lois du monde physique et du monde moral, 2 vols. (London, 1770)Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Kant's Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 5–6, 39–40, 60–1, 191–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl, ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1975), v, 3–5Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., ‘Discourse on metaphysics’, Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989), 35–68Google Scholar
Schulthess, Daniel, Leibniz et l'invention des phénomènes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009)Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas, ‘Aesthetics and politics’, in Jones, Gareth Stedman and Claeys, Gregory (eds.), Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 479–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Monadology, ed. Rescher, Nicholas (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991), esp. §§ 11–13Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald, ‘Leibniz on spontaneity’, in Rutherford, D. and Cover, J. A. (eds.), Leibniz: nature and freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 156–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, Freiheit und Form: Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte, ed. Schmücker, R. (Hamburg: Meiner, 2001)Google Scholar
Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), § 8 (v, 33)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, in Sämtliche Werke, ed. Glockner, H., vol. xii (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1964), 88, 90–1Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig (ed.), G. W. F. Hegel: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Berlin: Akademie, 1997)Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen (1795), in Werke, ed. Petersen, Julius et al., 42 vols. (Weimar: Böhlaus, 1962), xx, 309–412Google Scholar
On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, ed. and trans. Wilkinson, E. and Willoughby, L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1967), Letter vi/7
Riedel, M., Between Tradition and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Patten, A., Hegel's Idea of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Neuhouser, F., Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory: actualizing freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (ed.), Hegel: new directions (Chesham: Acumen, 2006)Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, ed. K.-H. Ilting, 4 vols. (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1974), iv, 61–3Google Scholar
Ruge, Arnold, ‘Die Hegelsche Rechtsphilosophie und die Politik unsrer Zeit’ (1842), in Hegel, G. W. F., Philosophie des Rechts, ed. H. Reichelt (Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein, 1972), 624–49Google Scholar
Bauer, Bruno, ‘Der christliche Staat und unsere Zeit’, in Hans-Martin Sass (ed.), Feldzüge der reinen Kritik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968), 33Google Scholar
Bauer, Bruno, ‘Verteidigungsrede vor den Wahlmännern des vierten Wahlbezirkes am 22. 2. 1849’, in Ernst Barnikol, Bruno Bauer: Studien und Materialien, ed. Peter Riemer and Hans-Martin Sass (Assen: van Gorcum, 1972), 522Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, ‘Contribution to the critique of Hegel's philosophy of law: introduction’, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, iii, 182
Marx, Karl, On the Jewish Question, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, iii, 164–8
Marx, , Capital i (New York: International Publishers, 1967), 178; Grundrisse, trans. Martin Nicholaus (New York: Vintage, 1973), 611Google Scholar
Marx, , Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, iii, 270–82
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The Communist Manifesto, ed. G. Stedman Jones (London: Penguin, 2002), 245–57Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘Idea for a universal history from a cosmopolitan point of view’ (1784), in Immanuel Kant on History, ed. and trans. Lewis White Beck (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963)Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre, Introduction à la lecture de Hegel (Paris: Gallimard, 1947)Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G., Der geschloßne Handelsstaat, in Werke, ed. I. H. Fichte, 8 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1971), iii, 388–513Google Scholar
von Humboldt, W., Ideen zu einem Versuch die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen (1792), in Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: Reimer, 1903), iGoogle Scholar
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage des Naturrechts, in Gesamtausgabe i/3 and i/4 (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1966 and 1970)Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, in Gesamtausgabe i/2 (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1965)Google Scholar
Science of Knowledge, trans. Heath, Peter and Lachs, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: studies in Kant (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), 3–27Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Phänomenologie des Geistes (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987)Google Scholar
Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig, ‘Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Philosophie’ (1839), Sämmtliche Werke ii (Stuttgart: Frommann, 1904)Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig, Das Wesen des Christentums (1841) (Berlin: Akademie, 1973)Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, ‘Critique of Hegel's philosophy of law’, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, iii, 3–130.
Schuffenhauer, Werner, Feuerbach und der junge Marx (Berlin: DVW, 1972), 88–131.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (London: Allen & Unwin, 1969), 735–54Google Scholar
Wissenschaft der Logik, in Gesammelte Werke, Friedrich Hogemann and Walter Jaeschke, 31 vols. (series ongoing) (Hamburg: Meiner, 1981), 154–72
de Vries, W., ‘The dialectic of teleology’, Philosophical Topics 19, no. 2 (1991), 51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggach, Douglas and Browne, Paul Leduc (eds.), The Social Question and the Democratic Revolution: Marx and the legacy of 1848 (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2000), 55–69Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, ‘The foundations of historical materialism’, in Studies in Critical Philosophy, trans. J. de Bres (Boston: Beacon Press, 1973), 1–48Google Scholar
Arthur, C. J., Dialectics of Labour: Marx in his relation to Hegel (London: Blackwell, 1986)Google Scholar
Quante, Michael, ‘Kommentar’, in Karl Marx: Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2009), 209–390Google Scholar
van Dooren, Willem, ‘Het arbeidsbegrip in Hegels Fenomenologie van de Geest’, in J. Kruithof and F. Mortier (eds.), De arbeid in Hegels filosofie (Antwerp: Lesoil, 1982), 56–7Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The German Ideology, in Collected Works, v, 31
Rosdolsky, Roman, The Making of Marx's ‘Capital’, trans. P. Burgess (London: Pluto, 1977)Google Scholar
D’Hondt, Jacques, ‘Marx en het Hegeliaanse arbeidsbegrip’, in J. Kruithof and F. Mortier (eds.), De arbeid in Hegels filosofie, 74–93
Althusser, Louis, For Marx, trans. Ben Brewster (London: New Left Books, 1977), 32–8Google Scholar
Reichelt, Helmut, Zur logischen Struktur des Kapitalbegriffs bei Karl Marx (Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1973)Google Scholar
Arthur, C. J., The New Dialectic and Marx's Capital (Leiden: Brill, 2002)Google Scholar
Quante, Michael, ‘Die fragile Einheit des Marxschen Denkens’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 60 (2006), 591–608Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas (ed.), Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian debates (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2011), 179–200Google Scholar
Brudney, Daniel, Marx's Attempt to Leave Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 160–7Google Scholar
Leopold, David, The Young Karl Marx: German philosophy, modern politics, and human flourishing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Institutiones juris naturae et gentium (1754), in Gesammelte Werke xxvi, ed. M. Thomann (Hildesheim: Olms, 1969), § 43, §§ 106–8Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith, Governing Economy: the reformation of German economic discourse, 1750–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘On the common saying: “this may be true in theory, but it does not apply in practice”’ (1793), in Kant's Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 74Google Scholar
Maesschalck, Marc, Droit et création sociale chez Fichte (Louvain: Peeters, 1996)Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. F., Marx and Aristotle (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1992)Google Scholar
Jones, Gareth Stedman, ‘Introduction’, in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto, ed. G. Stedman Jones, 99–140
Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton (New York: 1964), 112Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, Reason and Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1941)Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich, ‘Socialism, utopian and scientific’ (1880), in Marx Engels Selected Works (Moscow: Progress, 1970), iii, 95–151Google Scholar
Dialectics of Nature (1872–82?) (1925; Moscow: Foreign Languages, 1954)
Levine, Norman, Divergent Paths: Hegel in Marx and Engels (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006)Google Scholar
Plekhanov, Georgi, ‘Fundamental problems of Marxism’, Selected Philosophical Works (Moscow: Progress, 1976), iii, 117–83Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I., ‘Materialism and empirio-criticism’ (1908), Collected Works (Moscow: Progress, 1972), xiv, 17–362Google Scholar
Anderson, Kevin, Lenin, Hegel, and Western Marxism: a critical study (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1995), 105–6Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I., ‘Conspectus of Hegel's Book The Science of Logic’, in Collected Works (Moscow: Progress, 1961), xxxviii, 236Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre, Hegel ou Spinoza (Paris: Maspero, 1979)Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W., Dialectic of Enlightenment: philosophical fragments (1947), ed. G. S. Noerr, trans. E. Jephcott (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, Soviet Marxism (1958) (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Negative Dialektik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1966), 348Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Hegel: three studies (1963), trans. S. Weber Nicholson (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Autonomy and Solidarity, ed. P. Dews (London: Verso, 1986), 177, 214Google Scholar
The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Lawrence, F. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987), 63–9Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Theory of Communicative Action (1981), 2 vols., trans. T. McCarthy (1984; Boston: Beacon, 1987)Google Scholar
Faktizität und Geltung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992), 135–45
Honneth, Axel, The Struggle for Recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts, trans. J. Anderson (Cambridge: Polity, 1995)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×