Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T17:01:20.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2023

Lydia Schumacher
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Human Nature in Early Franciscan Thought
Philosophical Background and Theological Significance
, pp. 309 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Aelred of Rievaulx. De anima. London: Warburg Institute, 1952.Google Scholar
Alcher of Clairvaux. De spiritu et anima. PL 40. In Three Treatises on Man: A Cistercian Anthropology. Translated by Clark, Benjamin. Edited by McGinn, Bernard. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publishers, 1977.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias. De anima. In Pars I, Voluminis II: Alexandri Aphrodisiensis, Praeter Commentaria Scripta Minora, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Edited by Bruns, Ivo Berolini: Typis et Impensis Georgii Reimeri, 1887.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias. ‘The De anima of Alexander of Aphrodisias: A Translation and Commentary.’ Edited and translated by Fotonis, Athanasios P.. PhD, Marquette University, 1978.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica, 4 vols. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–48.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Magistri Alexandri de Hales Glossa in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi, 4 vols. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1951.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Magistri Alexandri de Hales Quaestiones disputatae ‘Antequam esset frater’, 3 vols. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1960.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Alexandri di Hales Quaestiones disputatae quae ad rerum universitatem pertinent. Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica medii aevi, 29. Edited by Wierzbicki, H.M.. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventure, 2013.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Alexandri di Hales Quaestiones disputatae de peccato originali. Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica medii aevi, 30. Edited by Wierzbicki, H.M.. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventure, 2013.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Alexandri di Hales Quaestiones disputatae de peccato veniali et de conscientia. Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica medii aevi, 32. Edited by Wierzbicki, H.M.. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventure, 2013.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Alexandri di Hales Quaestiones disputatae de lapsu angelorum ac protoparentum. Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica medii aevi, 31. Edited by Wierzbicki, H.M.. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventure, 2015.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. A Reader in Early Franciscan Theology: The Summa Halensis. Translated by Schumacher, Lydia and Bychkov, Oleg. New York: Fordham University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Alfredus Anglicus and Costa Ben Luca. Excerpta e libro Alfredi Angelici De motu cordis item Costa Ben Lucae De differentia animae et spiritus liber translatus a Johanne Hispalensi. Edited by Baruch, Carl Sigmund. Innsbruck: Verlag der Wagnerschen Universitaets-Buchhandlung, 1878.Google Scholar
Nequam, Alexander. Alexander Nequam Speculum Speculationum. Edited by Thomson, Rodney M.. Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, vol. 11. London: British Academy, 1988.Google Scholar
Anonymous. De potentiis animae et obiectis. Edited by Daniel A. Callus. In ‘The Powers of the Soul: An Early Unpublished Text.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 19 (1952): 131–70. Reprinted in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 66 (1985): 27–54.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Summa sententiarum. PL 176.Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury. S. Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia, 2 vols. Edited by Schmitt, Franciscus Salesius. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1968–84.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Iacobus Veneticus translator Aristotelis – De anima. TAGL.12.1.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Aristoteles Latinus: Codices, 3 vols. Edited by Lacombe, George et al. Rome: Libreria dello Stato, 1939–61.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Ethica nicomachea. Edited by Gauthier, René-Antoine. Leiden: Brill, 1972–74.Google Scholar
Augustine. De Genesi ad litteram. Edited by Zycha, J., CSEL 28.1. Vienna: F. Tempsky, 1894.Google Scholar
Augustine. De Trinitate. Edited by Mountain, W.J. and Glorie, F., CCSL 50–50A. Turnhout: Brepols, 1968.Google Scholar
Augustine. Retractions. CCSL 57. Edited by Bogan, M.I.. Turnhout: Brepols, 1968.Google Scholar
Augustine. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Contra academicos; De beata vita; De ordine; De magistro; De libero arbitrio. Edited by Daur, Klaus and Green, William M., CCSL 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970.Google Scholar
Augustine. On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Edited by King, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine. Augustinus Epistulae 124–184. Edited by Goldbacher, A., CSEL 44. Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1904; repr. 2013.Google Scholar
Avicebron. Avencebrolis (Ibn Gabirol) Fons Vitae, ex Arabico in Latinum Translatus ab Johanne Hispano et Dominico Gundissalino. Edited by Baeumker, Clemens. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Band I, Heft 2-4. Münster: Aschendorff, 1892–95.Google Scholar
Averroes. Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima Libros. Edited by Crawford, F.S.. Cambridge, Mass.: The Medieval Academy of America, 1953.Google Scholar
Averroes. Averroes (Ibn Rushd) of Cordova: Long Commentary on The De Anima of Aristotle. Translated by Taylor, Richard. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Avicenna. Avicenna Latinus: Liber de Anima seu Sextus de Naturalibus, 2 vols. Edited by Riet, Simone van. Leiden: Brill, 1968–72.Google Scholar
Avicenna. Avicenna Latinus: Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina. Edited by Riet, Simone van, introduction by G. Verbeke. Louvain: Peeters/Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1977, 1980, 1983.Google Scholar
Avicenna. Libri quinque canonis mecininae. Translated by Gerard of Cremona. Venice: Paganino de Paganini, 1507; repr. Hildesheim: Olms Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Avicenna. Avicenna’s Medicine: A New Translation. Edited by Abu-Asab, Mones, Amri, Hakima and Micozzi, Marc S.. Toronto: Healing Arts Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bernard of Clairvaux. The Treatise of St Bernard, Abbat of Clairvaux, Concerning Grace and Free Will. Translated by Williams, Watkin Wynn. New York: MacMillan, 1920.Google Scholar
Bernard of Clairvaux. On Grace and Free Choice. Edited by O’Donovan, Daniel, introduction by Bernard McGinn. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, Commentaria in quattuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1885.Google Scholar
Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (CUP). Edited by Denifle, H. and Chatelain, É.. Paris: Delalain, 1889–94; repr. Bruxelles: Culture et Civilisation, 1964.Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus. De unitate: Die dem Boethius fälschlich zugeschriebene Abhandlung des Dominicus Gundisalvi De Unitate. Edited by Correns, Paul. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Band I, Heft 1. Münster: Aschendorff, 1891.Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus. Des Dominicus Gundissalinus Schrift von dem Hervorgange der Welt (De processione mundi). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Band 24, Heft 3. Edited by Bülow, Georg. Münster: Aschendorff, 1925.Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus. De anima. ‘The Treatise De anima of Dominicus Gundissalinus.’ Edited by Muckle, Joseph Thomas. Mediaeval Studies 2 (1940): 23103.Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus. ‘El Liber De unitate et uno.’ Edited by Alonso, M. Alonso. Pensamiento 12 (1956): 179202.Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus. De processione mundi. Edited by Maria Bruno, Jesús Soto and del Real, Concepción Alonso. Pamplona: EUNSA, 1999.Google Scholar
Gundissalinus, Dominicus. De unitate et uno de Dominicus Gundissalinus. Edited by Soto, M.J. Bruno and Alonso del Real, C.. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2015.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa. Gregorius Nyssenus Latinus. Edited by Verbeke, G.. Leiden: Brill, 1975.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa. Gregorii Nysseni (Nemesii Emesini) Peri Physeos Anthropou, liber a Burgundio in latinam. Edited by Burkhard, C.. Vienna: B.G. Teubneri, 1917/81.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa. On the Making of Man. Translated by Wilson, H.A.. New York: Christian Literature Company, 1893.Google Scholar
Guerric of Saint-Quentin. Quaestiones de quodlibet: A Critical Edition. Edited by Principe, Walter H.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar
Johannitius. ‘Johannicius: Isagoge ad Techne Galieni.’ Edited by Maurach, Gregor. Sudhoffs Archiv 62:2 (1978): 148–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Blund, John. Iohannes Blund Tractatus De anima (Treatise on the Soul). Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, vol. 2. Translated by Dunne, Michael W.. Edited by Callus, Daniel A. and Hunt, R.W.. London: British Academy, 2012.Google Scholar
John of Damascus. Saint John Damascene, De fide orthodoxa: Versions of Burgundio and Cerbanus. Edited by Buytaert, Eligius M. St Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute, 1955.Google Scholar
John of La Rochelle. Tractatus de divisione multiplici potentiarum animae: Texte critique avec introduction, notes et tables. Edited by Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. Paris: Vrin, 1964.Google Scholar
John of La Rochelle. Summa de anima. Edited by Bougerol, Jacques Guy. Paris: Vrin, 1995.Google Scholar
John of La Rochelle. Somme de l’âme. Translated by Vernier, J.M.. Introduction by L.-J. Bataillon. Paris: Vrin, 2001.Google Scholar
John of La Rochelle. Iohannis de Rupella: Quaestiones Disputatae de legibus. Edited by Saccenti, Riccardo. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 2021.Google Scholar
Hugh of St Victor. Didascalicon. Edited by Buttimer, H.. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Nemesius of Emesa. Nemesii Episcopi Premnon Physicon. Translated by Alfanus. Edited by Burkhard, C.. Tuebner: Leipzig, 1917.Google Scholar
Nemesius of Emesa. On the Nature of Man. Translated by Sharples, R.W. and Van der Eijk, P.J.. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter. Petri Abaelardi Introductio ad theologiam. In Petri Abaelardi Opera II. Edited by Cousin, V.. Paris: A. Durand, 1859.Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter. Sententie Petri Abelardi (Sententie Hermanni). Edited by Buzzetti, S.. Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1983.Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter. Scit te ipsum, Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Medievalis 190. Edited by Ilgner, R.M.. Turnhout: Brepols, 2001.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Magistri Petri Lombardi Parisiensis episcopi Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, 2 vols, 3rd ed. Grottaferrata, Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventurae Ad Claras Aquas, 1971–81.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. The Sentences, Book 2: On Creation. Translated by Silano, Giulio. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor. Philippi Cancellarii Parisiensis Summa de bono, 2 vols. Edited by Wicki, Nikolaus. Bern: Francke, 1985.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius. De divinis nominibus, Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Medievalis 223. Translated by Gallus, Thomas. Edited by Lawell, Declan Anthony. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar
Roland of Cremona. Summae Magistri Rolandi Cremonensis, O.P., Liber Secundus. Edited by Cortesi, Aloysio and Midali, Humberto. Bergamo: Umberto Midali, 2016.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae De anima. Edited by Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. Leonine ed., vol. 24/1. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae, 60 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
William of Auvergne. Guillelmi Alverni Opera omnia, 2 vols. Paris, 1674.Google Scholar
William of Auvergne. The Soul. Translated by Teske, Roland J.. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
William of Auxerre. Magistri Guillelmi Altissiodorensis Summa aurea. Spicilegium Bonaventurianum 16–20. Edited by Ribaillier, Jean. Rome: Quarrachi, 1980–7.Google Scholar
William of St Thierry. ‘The Nature of the Body and the Soul (De natura corporis et animae libri duo).’ Translated by Clark, Benjamin. In Three Treatises on Man: A Cistercian Anthropology. Edited by McGinn, Bernard, 101–52. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1977.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adelman, Frederick J.The Theory of Will in St John Damascene.’ In The Quest for the Absolute. Edited by Adelman, Frederick J., 2237. Chestnut Hill: Boston College, 1966.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor to Francisco Suarez. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Alpina, Tommaso. ‘Intellectual Knowledge, Active Intellect, and Intellectual Memory in Avicenna’s Kitab al-Nafs and Its Aristotelian Background.’ Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 25 (2014): 13183.Google Scholar
Andrée, Alexander. ‘Laon Revisited: Master Anselm and the Creation of a Theological School in the Twelfth Century.’ Journal of Medieval Latin 22 (2012): 257–81.Google Scholar
Arnold, Johannes. Perfecta Communicatio: Die Trinitätstheologie Wilhelms von Auxerre. Münster: Aschendorff, 1995.Google Scholar
Backus, Irena. ‘John of Damascus, De fide orthodoxa: Translations by Burgundio (1153/4), Grosseteste (1235/40) and Lefèvre d’Etaples (1507).’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 49 (1986): 211–17.Google Scholar
Baldwin, John W. Masters, Princes and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter and His Circle, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Baldwin, John W..‘Masters at Paris from 1179 to 1215.’ In Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century. Edited by Benson, Robert L. and Constable, Giles with Carol D. Lanham, 138–72. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Bataillon, Louis Jacques. ‘Problèmes philosophiques dans les oeuvres théologiques.’ In L’enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des arts (Paris et Oxford, XIIIe–XVe siècles). Edited by Weijers, Olga and Holtz, Louis, 445–53. Paris: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. ‘Pluralism de formes ou dualism de substances? La pensée pré-thomiste touchant la nature de l’âme.’ Revue philosophique de Louvain 67 (1969): 3073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. ‘Les questions disputées, principalement dans les facultés de théologie.’ In Les questions disputées et les questions quodlibétiques dans les facultés de théologie, de droit et de médecine. Edited by Bazàn, Bernardo Carlos, Wippel, J. W., Fransen, G. and Jacquart, D., 13149. Turnhout: Brepols, 1985.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. ‘The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas’ Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism.’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 64 (1997): 95126.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. ‘Was There Ever a First Averroism?’ In Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert. Edited by Aertsen, Jan A. and Speer, Andreas, 3153. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. ‘Thirteenth-Century Commentaries on De anima: From Peter of Spain to Thomas Aquinas.’ In Commento filosofico nell’Occidente Latino (secoli XIII–XV). Edited by Fioravanti, Gianfranco, Leonardi, Claudio and Perfetti, Stefano, 119–84. Turnhout: Brepols, 2002.Google Scholar
Bejczy, I.P.John of La Rochelle and William Peraldus on the Virtues and Vices.’ Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 97 (2004): 99110.Google Scholar
Benson, Joshua C.Augustine and Bonaventure.’ In T&T Clark Companion to Augustine and Modern Theology. Edited by Pecknold, C.C. and Toom, Tarmo, 131–50. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Bériou, Nicole. ‘Federico Visconti, archevêque de Pise, disciple de Hugues de Saint-Cher’. In Hugues de Saint-Cher (d. 1263): bibliste et théologien. Edited by Bataillon, Louis J, Dahan, Gilbert and Gy, Pierre-Marie, 253–72. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.Google Scholar
Bertola, E.Le citazioni di Giovanni Damasceno nel primo libro delle Sentenze lombardiane.’ Pier Lombardo 1 (1957): 217.Google Scholar
Bertolacci, Amos. ‘On the Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics before Albertus Magnus: An Attempt at Periodization.’ In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics. Edited by Hasse, Dag Nikolaus and Bertolacci, Amos, 197223. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Bertolacci, Amos. ‘Reading Aristotle with Avicenna: On the Reception of the Philosophia Prima in the Summa Halensis.’ In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 135–54. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Luca. ‘Les interdictions relatives à l’enseignement d’Aristote au XIIIe siècle.’ In L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du ‘Guide de l’étudiant’ du ms. Ripoll 109. Edited by Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, Joanne, 109–37. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘Una questione disputata di ugo di St Cher sull’anima edizione e studio dottrinale.’ Studia Antyczne I Mediewistyczne 37 (2004): 127–84.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘Filippo il Cancelliere e Ugo di Saint-Cher sull’anima Umana.’ In L’origine dell’Ordine dei Predicatori e l’Università di Bologna. Edited by Bertuzzi, Giovanni, 105–17. Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano, 2006.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘The Sentences Commentary of Hugh of St Cher.’ In Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard. Edited by Rosemann, Philipp W., 111–47. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. The Body–Soul Problem at Paris ca. 1200–1250. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘The Powers of the Soul in the Anthropology of Hugh of St Cher.’ In Psychology and Other Disciplines: A Case of Cross-Disciplinary Interaction (1250–1750). Edited by Bakker, Paul J.J.M., de Boer, Sander W. and Leijenhorst, Cees, 157–70. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘Contents of Hugh of St Cher’s Commentary on the Sentences, Books I–II.’ Przegląd Tomistyczny 19 (2013): 991.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘The Soul–Body Union in the Summa Halensis.’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 3748. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Blumenkranz, Bernhard. ‘La survie médiévale de saint Augustin à travers ses apocryphes.’ In Augustinus Magister, 1003–18. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1954.Google Scholar
Boer, Sander de. The Science of the Soul: The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle’s De anima, c. 1260–1360. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, Gerald. ‘Concupiscentia.’ Augustinus‐Lexikon, vol. I, 1113–22. Munich: C.H. Beck, 1994.Google Scholar
Bonner, Gerald. ‘Cupiditas.’ Augustinus‐Lexikon, vol. II, 166–72. Munich: C.H. Beck, 1998.Google Scholar
Bossier, Fernand. ‘Les ennuis d’un traducteur: Quatre annotations sur la première traduction latine de l’Éthique à Nicomaque par Burgundio de Pise.’ Bijdragen 59 (1998): 406–27.Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. Introduction à l’étude de S. Bonaventure. Paris: Descleé, 1961.Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. ‘Jean de La Rochelle: Les oeuvres et les manuscrits.’ Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 87 (1994): 205–15.Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques Guy. ‘The Church Fathers and Auctoritates in Scholastic Theology to Bonaventure.’ In The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists, vol. 1. Edited by Backus, Irena, 289335. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. Duns Scot: la rigeur de la charité. Paris: Le Cerf, 1998.Google Scholar
Boureau, Alain. ‘Un sujet agité: le statu nouveau des passions de l’âme au XIIIe siècle.’ In Le sujet des émotions au moyen age. Edited by Nagy, Piroska and Boquet, Damien, 187200. Paris: Beauchesne, 2008.Google Scholar
Bowman, Leonard J.The Development of the Doctrine of the Agent Intellect in the Franciscan School of the Thirteenth Century.’ The Modern Schoolman 50 (1973): 251–79.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. ‘Remegius-Nemesius.’ Franciscan Studies 8 (1948): 275–84.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. ‘The Liber de anima of William of Vaurouillon O.F.M.’ Mediaeval Studies 11 (1949): 247307.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. ‘Jean de La Rochelle.’ In Dictionnaire de spiritualité, 599602. Paris: Beauchesne, 1974.Google Scholar
Brungs, Alexander, Mudroch, Vilem and Schulthess, Peter, eds. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie 4: Die Philosophie des Mittelalters. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 2017.Google Scholar
Buffon, Valeria. ‘Philosophers and Theologians on Happiness: An Analysis of Early Latin Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics.’ Laval théologique et philosophique 60:3 (2004): 449–76.Google Scholar
Buffon, Valeria. ‘The Structure of the Soul, Intellectual Virtues, and the Ethical Ideal of Masters of Arts in Early Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics.’ In Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages. Edited by Bejczy, István P., 1330. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. ‘The Contents and Affiliation of the Scientific Manuscripts Written at, or Brought to, Chartres in the Time of John of Salisbury.’ In The World of John of Salisbury. Edited by Wilks, M., 127–60. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. ‘Michael Scot and the Transmission of Scientific Culture from Toledo to Bologna via the Court of Frederick II Hohenstaufen.’ Micrologus 2 (1994): 101–26.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. ‘The Institutional Context of Arabic–Latin Translations in the Middle Ages: A Reassessment of the School of Toledo.’ In Vocabulary of Teaching and Research between the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Edited by Weijers, Olga, 214–35. Turnhout: Brepols, 1995.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. ‘Vincent of Beauvais, Michael Scot, and the New Aristotle.’ In Vincent de Beauvais, frère precheur, un intellectual et son milieu au XIII siècle. Edited by Duchenne, Marie-Christine, Lusignan, Serge and Paulmier-Foucart, Monique, 189213. Grâne: Rencontres à Royaumont, 1997.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles and Jacquart, Danielle. Constantine the African and ‘Alī ibn Al-‘Abbās Al-Magūsī: The Pantegni and Related Texts. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Bychkov, Oleg. ‘Decor ex praesentia mali: Aesthetic Explanations of Evil in Thirteenth-Century Franciscan Thought.’ Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 68:1 (2001): 245–69.Google Scholar
Bychkov, Oleg.Reader in Early Franciscan Theology: The Summa Halensis. Edited and translated by Oleg Bychkov and Lydia Schumacher. New York: Fordham, 2021.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.Gundissalinus’ De anima and the Problem of Substantial Form.’ The New Scholasticism 13 (1939): 338–55.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.. ‘Two Early Masters on the Problem of Plurality of Forms: Adam of Buckfield – Richard of Cornwall.’ Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie 63 (1939): 411–45.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.. ‘The Summa Duacensis and the Pseudo-Grosseteste’s De anima.’ Recherches de theólogie ancienne et médiévale 13 (1946): 225–29.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.. ‘The Powers of the Soul: An Early Unpublished Text.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 19 (1952): 131–70.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.. ‘The Treatise of John Blund on the Soul.’ In Autour d’Aristote: Recueil d’Etudes de Philosophie ancienne et médiévale affert à Monseigneur A. Mansion, 471–95. Louvain: Publications universitaíres de Louvain, 1955.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.. ‘The Origins of the Problem of the Unity of Form.’ The Thomist 24:2 (1961): 25785.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.. ‘The Function of the Philosopher in Thirteenth-Century Oxford.’ In Beiträge zum Berufsbewusstsein des mittelalterlichen Menschen. Edited by Wilpert, Paul, 152–62. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1964.Google Scholar
Cappuyns, M.Le de imagine de Gregoire de Nyssa, Traduit par John Scot Erigène.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 32 (1965): 205–62.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla. ‘Agostino, I medievali e il buon uso delle passioni.’ In Agostino d’Ippona: Presenza e pensiero: La scoperta dell’interiorità. Edited by Marini, A., 6575. Milan: Franco Angeli, 2004.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla and Vecchio, Silvana. ‘Les theories des passions dans la culture médiévale.’ In Le sujet des émotions au Moyen Age. Edited by Nagy, Piroska and Boquet, Damien, 107–22. Paris: Beauchesne, 2008.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Carla and Vecchio, Silvana. Passioni dell’anima: Teorie e usi degli affetti nella cultura medievale. Florence: Sismel-Ed. del Galluzzo, 2015.Google Scholar
Catalani, L. I Porretani: Una scuola di pensiero tra alto e basso medioevo. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar
Châtillon, Jean. ‘Guillaume de Saint-Thierry, le monachisme et les ecoles: A propos de Rupert de Deutz, d’Abelard et de Guillaume de Conches.’ In Saint-Thierry: Une abbaye du IVe au XXe siècle, 375–94. Actes du colloque international d’histoire monastique: Reims, Saint-Thierry, 1976.Google Scholar
Châtillon, Jean. ‘Le Mouvement théologique dans la France de Philippe Auguste.’ In La France de Philippe Auguste: Le Temps des Mutations. Edited by Bautier, Robert-Henri, 881904. Paris: CNRS, 1982.Google Scholar
Chenu, Marie-Dominique. La théologie au douziéme siècle. Translated by Taylor, J.. Paris: Vrin, 1957.Google Scholar
Chenu, Marie-Dominique. ‘Spiritus: le vocabulaire de l’âme au XIIe siècle.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 41 (1957): 209–32.Google Scholar
Chirico, Maria Antonietta. ‘Les auctoritates di Isacco della Stella.’ In Auctor et auctoritas in latinis Medii Aevi litteris. Edited by D’Angelo, Edoardo and Ziolkowski, Jan M., 239–64. Florence: SISMEL, 2014.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy. The Friars and the Jews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.Early Scholastic Angelology.’ Recherches de Theologie ancienne et medievale 62 (1995): 80109.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.. ‘The Sentence Collection and the Education of Professional Theologians in the Twelfth Century.’ In The Intellectual Climate of the Early University: Essays in Honor of Otto Grundler. Edited by Van Deusen, Nancy, 126. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, 1997.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.. ‘From the Sentence Collection to the Sentence Commentary and the Summa: Parisian Scholastic Theology, 1130–1215.’ In Studies in Scholasticism, by Colish, Marica L., 929. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.. ‘Authority and Interpretation in Scholastic Theology.’ In Studies in Scholasticism, by Colish, Marica L., 116. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.. ‘Otto of Lucca: Author of the Summa sententiarum?’ In Discovery and Distinction in the Early Middle Ages: Studies in Honor of John J. Contreni. Edited by Chandler, Cullen J. and Sofferahn, Steven A., 5770. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 2013.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.. ‘Free Will and Grace: Method and Model in Anselm’s De Concordia.’ In Anselm of Canterbury: Nature, Order and the Divine. Edited by Logan, Ian and Gasper, Giles G.E., Anselm Studies and Texts. Leiden: Brill, 2021.Google Scholar
Collins, James Daniel. The Thomistic Philosophy of Angels. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Côté, Antoine. ‘Note sur Guerric de Saint-Quentin et la question de l’infini divin.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 62 (1995): 71–9.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus’ Theory of Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. ‘The Reception of John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis.’ In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context, 7190. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Crow, Michael Bertram. The Changing Profile of the Natural Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977; repr. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Crowley, Theodore. Roger Bacon: The Problem of the Soul in His Philosophical Commentaries. Dublin: Maes Duffey, 1950.Google Scholar
Cullen, Christopher M. Bonaventure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Curtin, Margaret M.The intellectus agens in the Summa of Alexander of Hales.’ Franciscan Studies 5 (1945): 41833.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Carmen Angela. Seeking the Face of God: A Study on Augustine’s Reception in the Mystical Thought of Bernard of Clairvaux and William of St Thierry. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina. ‘The Origins of Islamic Philosophy.’ In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by Gerson, Lloyd, 869–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina. ‘The Liber de causis.’ In Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance: Edited by Gersh, Stephen, 137–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dahan, Gilbert. ‘Une introduction à l’étude de la philosophie: Ut ait Tullius.’ In L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du Guide de l’étudiant du ms. Ripoll 109. Edited by Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, Joanne, 358. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, Richard C. The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Dales, Richard C.. ‘The Understanding of Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy by the Early Scholastics.’ In The Intellectual Climate of the Early University: Essays in Honor of Otto Gründler. Edited by Deusen, Nancy van, 141–50. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1997.Google Scholar
Dalfardi, Behnam, Daneshfard, Babak and Nezhad, Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi. ‘Johannitius (809–873 AD): A Medieval Physician, Translator and Author.’ Journal of Medical Biography 24:3 (2016): 328–30.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. Alfarabi, Averroes and Avicenna on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Davis, Adam Jeffrey. The Holy Bureaucrat: Eudes Rigaud and Religious Reform in Thirteenth-Century Normandy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
De Contenson, P.-M.Avicennisme latin et vision de Dieu au début du XIIIe siècle.’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 34 (1959): 2997.Google Scholar
Déchanet, J.M. Aux sources de la spiritualité de Guillaume de St Thierry. Bruges: Beyaert, 1940.Google Scholar
D’Esneval, A.La division de la Vulgate latine en chapitres dans l’edition parisienne du XIIIe siècle.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 62 (1978): 559–68.Google Scholar
De Libera, Alain. ‘Le sens commun au XIIIe siècle: De Jean de La Rochelle à Albert le Grand.’ Revue de métaphysique et morale 96 (1991): 475–96.Google Scholar
De Libera, Alain. ‘Faculté des arts ou Faculté de philosophie?’ In L’enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des arts (Paris et Oxford, Xllle-xve siècles). Edited by Weijers, Olga and Holtz, Louis, 429–44. Paris: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
De Ridder-Symoens, Hilde and Rüegg, Walter. A History of the University in Europe, 4 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992–2011.Google Scholar
Delmas, Sophie. ‘Philippe le Chancelier et les orders mendicants: Anatomie d’une relation.’ In Philippe le Chancelier: Prédicateur, théologien et poète parisien. Edited by Dahan, Gilbert and Rillon-Marne, Anne-Zoé, 2539. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar
Delmas, Sophie. ‘Odo Rigaldi, Alexander of Hales and the Summa Halensis.’ In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 267–84. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Dixon, Thomas. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dobler, E. Nemesius von Emesa und die Psychologie des menchlichen Aktes bei Thomae von Aquin (S.Th. Ia Iiae, qqq. 6–17): Eine quellenanalytische Studie. Luzern: Werthenstein, 1950.Google Scholar
Dobler, E.. Indirekte Nemesiuszitäte bei Thomae von Aquin: Johannes von Damaskus als Vermittler von Nemesiustexten. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Henri-F. and Guyot, B.-G.. ‘L’objet et le ‘medium’ de la vision béatifique chez les théologiens du XIIIe siècle.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 19 (1952): 60130.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Henri-F. and Guyot, B.-G.. ‘Guerric de Saint-Quentin et la condamnation de 1241.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 44 (1960): 225–42.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. ‘Les 572 Questions du manuscrit de Douai 434.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 10 (1938): 123–52.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. ‘A New Source of the ‘Summa fratris Alexandri.’ Franciscan Studies 6 (1946): 403–17.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. ‘The History of the Problem of the Authenticity of the Summa.’ Franciscan Studies 7 (1947), 274312.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. ‘Prolegomena in librum III necnon in libros I et II Summae Fratris Alexandri.’ In Alexandri de Hales Summa Theologica, vol. 4. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1948.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. ‘A travers le manuscript 434 de Douai.’ Antonianum 27 (1952): 531–80.Google Scholar
Dougherty, M.V.Twenty Moral Dilemmas from Two Early Thirteenth-Century Summaries of Theology: William of Auxerre’s Summa aurea and the Franciscan Summa Halensiana.’ In Moral Dilemmas in Medieval Thought from Gratian to Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter, ed. The History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter. ‘William of Conches and the New Aristotle.’ Studi medievali 43:1 (2002): 157–63.Google Scholar
Drummond, Ian. ‘John Duns Scotus on the Passions of the Will.’ In Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Pickavé, Martin and Shapiro, Lisa, 5374. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dutton, Marsha, ed. A Companion to Aelred of Rievaulx (1110–1167). Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Even-Ezra, Ayelet. Ecstasy in the Classroom: Trance, Self, and the Academic Profession in Medieval Paris. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Even-Ezra, Ayelet. ‘The Summa Halensis: A Text in Context.’ In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 219–34. Berlin: De Gruyter 2020.Google Scholar
Fani, Antonella. ‘Communissima, trascendentali e Trinità: Da Filippo il Cancelliere alla prima scuola Francescana.’ Il Santo: Rivista Francescana de storia dottrina arte 49 (2009), 13154.Google Scholar
Ferruolo, S.C.The Paris Statutes of 1215 Reconsidered.’ History of Universities 5 (1985): 114.Google Scholar
Fidora, Alexander. Die Wissenschaftstheorie des Dominicus Gundissalinus. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar
Fidora, Alexander. ‘Arabic into Latin into Hebrew: Aristotelian Psychology and its Contribution to the Rationalisation of Theological Traditions.’ In Philosophical Psychology in Medieval Arabic and Latin Aristotelianism. Edited by López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier and Tellkamp, Jörg Alejandro, 1739. Paris: Vrin, 2013.Google Scholar
Fidora, Alexander. ‘The Soul as Harmony: A Disputed Doctrine in Twelfth-Century Cistercian Anthropology.’ Cistercian Studies Quarterly 55:3 (2020): 333–45.Google Scholar
Fidora, Alexander. ‘The Talmud and the Summa Halensis.’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 169–83. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Filthaut, E. Roland von Cremona O.P. und die Anfänge der Scholastik im Predigerorden. Vechta i.O.: Albertus-Magnus-Verlag der Dominikaner, 1936.Google Scholar
Fisher, John. ‘Hugh of St Cher and the Development of Medieval Theology.’ Speculum 31:1 (1956): 5769.Google Scholar
Fotonis, P. ‘The De anima of Alexander of Aphrodisias: A Translation and Commentary’ (PhD Dissertation, Marquette University, 1978), 303.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. ‘John of Damascus on Human Action, the Will, and Human Freedom.’ In Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources. Edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina, 6395. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René A.Saint Maxime le Confesseur et la psychologie de l’act humain.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 21 (1954): 51100.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René A.. ‘Le cours sur ‘l’ethica nova d’un maitre des arts de Paris (1235–40).’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 42 (1975): 71141.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René A.. ‘Le traité De anima et de potenciis eius d’un maitre des arts (vers 1225): Introduction et texte critique.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 66 (Paris: Vrin, 1982): 355.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René A.. ‘Notes sur les débuts (1225–1240) du premier Averroisme.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 66 (1982): 322–74.Google Scholar
Ghellinck, J. de. Le mouvement théologique du XIIe siècle: Sa préparation lointaine avant et autour de Pierre Lombard, ses rapports avec les initiatives des canonistes: Études, recherches et documents. Paris: Librairie Victor Lecoffre, 1914; repr. Bruges: Éditions De Temple, 1948.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. ‘Pourquoi saint Thomas a critiqué saint Augustin.’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 1 (1926–7), 5127.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. Introduction a l’etude de S. Augustin. Paris: Vrin, 1929.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. ‘Les sources Greco-arabes de l’augustinisme avicennisant.’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 4 (1929–30): 5149.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. New York: Random House, 1955.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. The Philosophy of St Bonaventure. Chicago: Franciscan Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. Répertoire des maîtres en théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle, 2 vols. Paris: Vrin, 1933–4.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. ‘Aux origines du Quodlibet.’ Divus Thomas 38 (1935): 502–22.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. ‘Les 572 Questions du manuscrit de Douai 434.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 10 (1938): 123–52.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. La ‘Summa Duacensis’ (Douai 434). Paris: Vrin, 1955.Google Scholar
González-Ayesta, Cruz. ‘Duns Scotus on the Natural Will.’ Vivarium 50 (2012): 3352.Google Scholar
Gorochov, Nathalie. ‘The Self-Image of the Masters of Theology at the University of Paris in the Late Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries.’ Journal of Ecclesiastical History 46 (1995): 398–43.Google Scholar
Gorochov, Nathalie. Naissance de l’Université: Les écoles de Paris d’Innocent III à Thomas d’Aquin (v. 1200–v. 1245). Paris: Honoré Champion, 2016.Google Scholar
Gorochov, Nathalie. ‘Odo Rigaldus at the University of Paris (c. 1220–48).’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 151–68. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Die Geschichte der scholastischen Methode, 2 vols. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herdersche Verlagshandlung, 1909–11.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin. Forschungen über die lateinischen Aristotelesübersetzungen des XIII. Jahrhunderts, Münster: Aschendorff, 1916.Google Scholar
Green, Monica H.Gloriosissimus Galienus: Galen and Galenic Writings in the Eleventh and Twelfth Century Latin West.’ In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen. Edited by Bouras-Vallianatos, Petros and Zipser, Barbara, 319–42. Leiden, Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Grice, Deborah. Church, Society and University: The Paris Condemnation of 1241/4. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Guyot, B.-G.Guerric de Saint-Quentin.’ Dictionnaire de Spiritualité 6 (1967): 1121–22.Google Scholar
Haldane, John and Lee, Patrick. ‘Aquinas on Human Ensoulment: Abortion and the Value of Life.’ Philosophy 78:304 (April 2003): 255–78.Google Scholar
Hamelin, A.M. L’école franciscaine de ses débuts jusqu’à l’occamisma. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1961.Google Scholar
Harkins, Franklin T.The Embodiment of Angels: A Debate in Mid-Thirteenth-Century Theology.’ Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 78:1 (2011): 2558.Google Scholar
Harkins, Franklin T.. ‘The Magical Arts, Angelic Intercourse, and Giant Offspring: Echoes of Watchers Traditions in Medieval Scholastic Angelology.’ In The Fallen Angels Traditions. Edited by Harkins, Angela Kim, Bautch, Kelley Coblentz and Endres, John C., 157–79. Washington, DC: The Catholic Biblical Association of America, 2014.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. ‘Das Lehrstück von den vier Intellekten in der Scholastik: von den arabischen Quellen bis zu Albertus Magnus.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 66:1 (1999): 2177.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. Avicenna’s De anima in the Latin West. London: Warburg Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. Latin Averroes Translations of the First Half of the Thirteenth Century. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus. ‘Der mutmaßliche arabische Einfluss auf die literarische Form der Universitätsliteratur des 13. Jahrhunderts.’ In Albertus Magnus und der Ursprung der Universitätsidee: Die Begegnung der Wissenschaftskulturen im 13. Jahrhundert und die Entdeckung des Konzepts der Bildung durch Wissenschaft. Edited by Honnefelder, Ludger, 241–58, 487–91. Berlin: Berlin University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Henquinet, François-Marie. ‘Les écrits du frère Guerric de Saint-Quentin, O.P.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 6 (1934): 184214, 84–312, 94–410.Google Scholar
Henquinet, François-Marie. ‘Notes additionnelles sur les écrits de Guerric de Saint-Quentin.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 8 (1936): 369–88.Google Scholar
Hess, C.R.Roland of Cremona’s Place in the Current of Thought.’ Angelicum 45 (1968): 429–77.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Tobias. ‘Freedom without Choice: Medieval Theories of the Essence of Freedom.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics. Edited by Williams, Thomas, 194403. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Tobias. Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger. Scientia transcendens: Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit (Duns Scotus, Suárez, Wolff, Kant, Peirce). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger. ‘Metaphysics as a Discipline: From the Transcendental Philosophy of the Ancients to Kant’s Notion of Transcendental Philosophy.’ In The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory 1400–1700. Edited by Friedman, R.L. and Nielsen, L.O., 5374. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur. ‘Averroes’ Theory of the Intellect and the Ancient Commentators.’ In Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition. Edited by Endress, Gerhard and Aertsten, Jan A., 188–98. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Ingham, Mary Beth. ‘Franciscan Identity, Poverty and the Rational Will: From the Summa Halensis to John Duns Scotus.’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought, 257–80. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Ivry, Alfred L.Averroes’ Three Commentaries on De anima.’ In Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition. Edited by Endress, Gerhard and Aertsen, Jan A., 199216. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. ‘The Introduction of Arabic Medicine into the West: The Question of Etiology.’ In Health, Disease and Healing in Medieval Culture. Edited by Campbell, Sheila, Hall, Bert, and Klausner, David, 186–95. Toronto: Center for Medieval Studies, 1992.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. ‘Les emprunts de Guillaume de Conches aux theories médicales.’ In Guillaume de Conches Philosophie et science au Xiie siècle. Edited by Obrist, Barbara and Caiazzo, Irène, 79110. Florence: SISMEL, 2011.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. ‘La reconstruction médicale de la nature de l’homme aux XIe et XIIe siècles.’ Revue de synthèse 134:6:4 (2013): 445–72.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. Recherches médiévales sur la nature humaine: Essais sur la réflexion médicale (XIIe–XVe siècle). Florence: SISMEL, 2014.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle and Micheau, Françoise. La medicine arabe et l’Occident médiévale. Paris: Maisonneuve and Larose, 1990.Google Scholar
Janos, Damien. Avicenna on the Ontology of Pure Quiddity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020,Google Scholar
Jüssen, Gabriel. ‘Wilhelm von Auvergne und die Entwicklung der Philosophie in Übergang zur Hochscholastik.’ In Thomas von Aquin im philosophischen Gespräch. Edited by Klugen, Wolfgang, 185203. Freiburg, 1975.Google Scholar
Jüssen, Gabriel. ‘Aristoteles-Rezeption und Aristoteles-Kritik in Wilhelm von Auvergne’s Tractatus de anima.’ In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Sten Ebbesen, Simo Knuuttila and Työrinoja, Reijo et al., 8796. Helsinki, 1990.Google Scholar
Kaepelli, Th.Guerricus de S. Quintino.’ In Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum Medii Aevi, 6170. Rome, 1975.Google Scholar
Keck, David. Angels and Angelology in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Keeler, Leo W.The Dependence of R. Grosseteste’s De anima on the Summa of Philip the Chancellor.’ The New Scholasticism 11:3 (1937): 197219.Google Scholar
Keicher, Otto. ‘Zur Lehre der ältesten Franziskanertheologen vom intellectus agens.’ In Abhandlung aus dem Gebiete der Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte: Ein Festgabe zum 70. Geburtstag Georg Freiherrn von Hertling. Edited by Baumgartner, Matthias and von Graf, Georg Hertling, 17382. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herdersche Verlagshandlung, 1913.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995.Google Scholar
King, Peter. ‘Scotus’ Rejection of Anselm: The Two Wills Theory.’ In Archa Verbi 5: Johannes Duns Scotus, 355–77. Munster: Aschendorff, 2010.Google Scholar
Kleineidam, E. ‘Das Problem der Hylomorphen Zusammensetzung der Geistigen Substanzen im 13. Jahrhundert.’ PhD, Breslau, 1930.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. ‘Medieval Theories of the Passions of the Soul.’ In Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes, 4983. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kobusch, Theo. Die Entdeckung der Person: Metaphysik der Freiheit und modernes Menschenbild. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1997.Google Scholar
Kobusch, Theo. ‘The Summa Halensis: Towards a New Concept of Person.’ In The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P.O.The School of Salerno: Its Development and Its Contribution to the History of Learning.’ In Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters, 495551. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letturatura, 1956.Google Scholar
Künzle, P. Das Verhältnis der Seele zu ihren Potenzen; problemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen von Augustin bis und mit Thomas von Aquin. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1956.Google Scholar
Lafleur, Claude with Carrier, Joanne, ‘La réglementation curriculaire dans les introductions à la philosophie et les guides de l’étudiant de la Faculté des arts de Paris au XIIIE siècle: Une mise en context.’ In L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du Guide de l’étudiant du ms. Ripoll 109. Edited by Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, Joanne, 521–48. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Landgraf, Artur Michael. Einführung in die Geschichte der theologischen Literature der Frühscholastik, unter dem Gesichtspunkte der Schulenbildung. Regensburg: Gregorius Verlag, 1948.Google Scholar
Landgraf, Artur Michael. Introduction à l’histoire de la littérature théologique de la scolastique naissante, trans. L.B. Geiger. Paris: Vrin, 1973.Google Scholar
Laumekis, John A.Introduction.’ In Dominicus Gundissalinus: The Procession of the World (De processione mundi), 930. Marquette: Marquette University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lefevre, G. Les variations de Guillaume de Champeaux et la question des Universaux: Étude suivie de documents originaux. Lille: Université de Lille, 1898.Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. Paris and Oxford Universities in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries: An Institutional and Intellectual History. London: Wiley, 1968.Google Scholar
Lerner, Robert E.The Vocation of the Friars Preacher: Hugh of St Cher Between Peter the Chanter and Albert the Great.’ In Hugues de Saint-Cher (d. 1263): Bibliste et théologien. Edited by Bataillon, Louis J., Dahan, Gilbert and Gy, Pierre-Marie, 215–31. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.Google Scholar
Levine, Philip. ‘Two Early Latin Versions of St Gregory of Nyssa’s περὶ κατασκευης ἀνθρώπου.’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63 (1958): 473–92.Google Scholar
Lewis, Neil. ‘The Problem of the Unicity of Truth in the Early Oxford Franciscan School.’ In Early Thirteenth-Century English Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 149–70. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Little, A.G.The Franciscan School at Oxford in the Thirteenth Century.’ Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 19 (1926): 803–74.Google Scholar
Longpré, Ephrem. ‘Guillaume d’Auvergne et Alexandre de Halès.’ Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 16 (1923): 426–29.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. ‘Les traités sur l’âme et les vertus de Jean de la Rochelle.’ Revue Philosophique de Louvain 25 (1930): 532.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. ‘Alexandre de Halés et la Summa de anima de Jean de la Rochelle.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 2 (1930): 396409.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. ‘La composition hylémorphique des substances spirituelles: Les débuts de la controverse.’ Revue néoscholastique de philosophie 34 (1932): 2141.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. ‘La pluralité des forms substantielles avant saint Thomas d’Aquin: Quelques documents nouveaux.’ Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie 34 (1932): 449–67.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. ‘L’identité de l’âme et de ses facultés pendent la première moitié du Xiiie siècle.’ Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 41 (1934): 191201.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. ‘Roland de Crémone et Hugues de Saint-Cher.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiéevale 12 (1940): 136–43.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles, 6 vols. Gembloux: J. Duculot, 1948–60.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David. ‘Ethics in the Early Thirteenth Century.’ In Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter. Edited by Honnefelder, Ludger, 657–84. Munster: Aschendorff, 2005.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. The Philosophy of Peter Abelard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. ‘William of Champeaux.’ In A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Edited by Gracia, Jorge J.E. and Noone, Timothy B., 690–1. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. ‘Life, Milieu and Cultural Contexts.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Abelard. Edited by Brower, Jeffrey E. and Gulfoy, Kevin, 1344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Markus, R.A.Augustine – Man: Body and Soul.’ In The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Armstrong, A.H., 354–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael E.Avicenna on Primary Concepts.’ In Logos Islamikos: Studia Islamica in Honorem Georgii Michaelis Wickens. Edited by Savory, R.M. and Agius, D.A., 219–39. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Marrone, Stephen P. William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste: New Ideas of Truth in the Thirteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard. The Golden Chain: A Study in the Theological Anthropology of Isaac of Stella. Washington, DC: Cistercian Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard. ‘Introduction.’ In Three Treatises on Man: A Cistercian Anthropology, 1100. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Jon. ‘Avicennian Infinity: A Select History of the Infinite through Avicenna.’ Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 21 (2010): 199222.Google Scholar
Meirinhos, José. ‘Intellectus agens triplex distinguitur: Early Franciscans and Avicenna in Petrus Hispanus’ Theory of the Agent Intellect in the Scientia libri de anima.’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 297321. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J.Debating the Authority of Pseudo-Augustine’s De spiritu et anima.’ Prezgląd Tomistyczny 24 (2018): 321–48.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J.. ‘The Early Diffusion of the De spiritu et anima and Cistercian Reflection on the Powers of the Soul.’ Viator 49:3 (2019): 297330.Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. ‘La classification des puissances de l’âme au XIIe siècle.’ Revue du Moyen Age Latin 5 (1949): 1534.Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. ‘Les puissances de l’âme chez Jean de la Rochelle.’ Antonianum 24 (1949): 489505.Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, Pierre. ‘Une division “augustinienne” des puissances de l’âme au moyen age.’ Revue des Études Augustiniennes 3 (1957): 235–48.Google Scholar
Migne, J.P., ed. Patrologia Latina, vol. 40. Paris: Garnier, 1865.Google Scholar
Miller, Robert. ‘An Aspect of Averroes’ Influence on St Albert.’ Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954): 5771.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, L.Le texte du De anima d’Aristote: La tradition latine avant 1500.’ In Opuscula: The Latin Aristotle, 250–76. Amsterdam, 1972.Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A.William of Auvergne and His Treatise De anima.’ In Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Science, and Logic, Collected Papers 1933–1969, 1109. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Morani, Moreno. La tradizione manoscritta del De natura hominis di Nemesi. Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1981.Google Scholar
Morenzoni, Franco and Tilliette, Jean-Yves, eds. Autour de Guillaume d’Auvergne. Turnhout: Brepols, 2005.Google Scholar
Muckle, J. T.The Treatise De anima of Dominicus Gundissalinus.’ Mediaeval Studies 2 (1940): 23103.Google Scholar
Müssen, Gabriel. ‘Wilhelm von Auvergne und die Entwicklung der Philosophie in Übergang zur Hochscholastik.’ In Thomas von Aquin im philosophischen Gespräch. Edited by Klugen, Wolfgang, 185203. Freiburg: Karl Alber, 1975.Google Scholar
Müssen, Gabriel. ‘Aristoteles-Rezeption und Aristoteles-Kritik in Wilhelm von Auvergne’s Tractatus de anima.’ In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Reijo, Työrinoja, 8796. Helsinki: Alpha, 1990.Google Scholar
Nejeschebi, Tomas. ‘Thomas Aquinas and the Early Franciscan School on the Agent Intellect.’ Verbum 6:1 (2004): 6778.Google Scholar
O’Daly, G.J.P. and Zumkeller, A.. ‘Affectus (passio, perturbatio).’ In Augustinus‐Lexikon, vol. 1. Edited by Mayer, C., 166–80. Basel: Schwabe, 1986–.Google Scholar
Osborne, Keenan B.Alexander of Hales.’ In The History of Franciscan Theology, 138. St Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute, 2007.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of the Summa Theologiae Ia 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. ‘Souls and the Beginning of Life.’ Philosophy 78:306 (October 2003): 509–19Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. ‘Intentionality and Action: Medieval Discussions on the Cognitive Capacities of Animals.’ In Intellect and Imagination in Medieval Philosophy, 7398. Edited by Pacheco, M.C. and Meirinhos, José. Turnhout: Brepols, 2006.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. ‘Thought Experiments: The Methodological Function of Angels in Late Medieval Epistemology.’ In Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry: Their Function and Significance. Edited by Iribarren, Isabel and Lenz, Martin, 143–53. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. ‘How Many Souls Do I Have? Late Aristotelian Debates on the Plurality of Faculties.’ In Medieval Perspectives on Aristotle’s De anima. Edited by Friedman, R. and Counet, J.-M., 27796. Louvain: Peeters 2013.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. ‘What Are Faculties of the Soul? Descartes and His Scholastic Background.’ Proceedings of the British Academy 189 (2013): 938.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik and Corcilius, Klaus. Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz. Berlin: De Gruyter 2014.Google Scholar
Pessin, Sarah. ‘Avicebron.’ In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-gabirol/Google Scholar
Pessin, Sarah. Ibn Gabirol’s Theology of Desire: Matter and Method in Jewish Medieval Neoplatonism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pitour, Thomas. Wilhelm von Auvergne’s Psychologie: Von der Rezeption des aristotelische Hylemorphismus zur Reformulierung der Imago-Dei-Lehre Augustinus. Paderborn: Ferdinand and Schönling, 2011.Google Scholar
Polloni, Nicola. ‘Toledan Ontologies: Gundissalinus, Ibn Daud, and the Problems of Gabirolian Hylomorphism.’ In Appropriation, Interpretation and Criticism: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges between the Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Intellectual Traditions. Edited by Fidora, Alexander and Polloni, Nicola, 1949. Barcelona and Rome: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Etudes Médiévales, 2017.Google Scholar
Polloni, Nicola. The Twelfth-Century Renewal of Latin Metaphysics: Gundissalinus’s Ontology of Matter and Form. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2020.Google Scholar
Polloni, Nicola. ‘Dominicus Gundissalinus’ On Unity and the One.’ In Medieval Philosophy and the Jewish, Islamic, and Christian Traditions: Essays in Honor of Richard Taylor. Edited by López Farjeat, L.X., Krause, K., and Oschman, N, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pouchet, Robert. La ‘rectitudo’ chez Saint Anselme: Un itinéraire augustinien de l’âme à Dieu. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1964.Google Scholar
Pouillon, Henri. ‘Le premier traité des propriétiés transcendentales: La Summa de bono du Chancelier Philippe’, Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 42 (1939), 4077.Google Scholar
Prête, E.La posizione di Rolando da Cremona nel pensiero médiévale.’ Rivista di Folosofia neoscolastica 23 (1931): 484–89.Google Scholar
Puig, Josep. ‘The Transmission and Reception of Arabic Philosophy in Christian Spain (Until 1200).’ In The Introduction of Arabic Philosophy into Europe. Edited by Butterworth, Charles E. and Kessel, Blake Andrée, 730. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Quinto, Riccardo. ‘Le Commentaire des Sentences d’Hugues de Saint-Cher et la littérature théologique de son temps.’ In Hugues de Saint-Cher (d. 1263): Bibliste et théologien. Edited by Bataillon, Louis J., Dahan, Gilbert and Gy, Pierre-Marie, 299324. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.Google Scholar
Raedemaeker, J. De.Une ébauche de catalogue des commentaires sur le De anima parus aux XIII, XIV et XV siècles.’ Bulletin de la société internationale pour le étude de la philosophie médievale 5 (Louvain: SIEPM, 1963): 149–83.Google Scholar
Raedmemaeker, J. De.. ‘Informations concernant quelques commentaires du De anima.’ Bulletin de la société internationale pour l’étude de la philosophie médievale 10–12 (Louvain: SIEPM 1968–70): 194–211.Google Scholar
Regan, Teresa. ‘A Study of the Liber De spiritu et anima.’ PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 1948.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest. Averroès et l’Averroisme: Essai historique. Paris: Calmann Lèvy, 1882.Google Scholar
Reypens, L. ‘Âme: Sa fond, ses puissances et sa structure d’après les mystiques.’ In Dictionnaire de Spiritualité, 433–69. Paris: Beauchesne, 1937.Google Scholar
Rist, John M.Augustine on Free Will and Predestination.’ Journal of Theological Studies 20:2 (1969): 420–47.Google Scholar
Roest, Bert. A History of Franciscan Education. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar
Rohmer, J.La théorie de l’abstraction dans l’école Franciscaine d’Alexandre de Halés à Jean Peckham.’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 3 (1928): 105–84.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W. The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ryan, Denise. ‘An Examination of a Thirteenth-Century Treatise on the Mind–Body Dichotomy: Jean de la Rochelle on the Soul and its Powers.’ PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 2010.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo. Conservare la retta volontà: L’atto morale nelle dottrine di Filippo il Cancelliere e Ugo di Saint-Cher (1225–1235). Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino, 2013.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo. Un nuovo lessico morale medieval: Il contributo di Burgundio da Pisa. Aricca: Aracne, 2016.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo. ‘The Reception of the Summa Halensis in the Manuscript Tradition until 1450.’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 353–71. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo. Iohannis de Rupella: Quaestiones Disputatae de legibus. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 2021.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo. ‘Summa de divinis nominibus and Summa de articulis fidei’. In Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Salman, Dominique H.Note sur le première influence d’Averroès.’ Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie 54 (1937): 203–12.Google Scholar
Salman, Dominique H.. ‘Jean de La Rochelle et les débuts de l’Averroisme Latin.’ Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge (1947–8): 133–44.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ‘Aquinas’ Five Ways: A Pastoral Interpretation.’ Theology 119:1 (2016): 2633.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. Early Franciscan Theology: Between Authority and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ed. The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ed. The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ed. The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ‘Christian Platonism: The Middle Ages.’ In Christian Platonism: A History. Edited by Hampton, Alexander and Kenney, John, 183206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ed. Early Thirteenth-Century English Franciscan Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. ‘Active Perception and Cognition in Early Franciscan Thought’, in Active Cognition in Medieval Thought, ed. Filipe da Silva (Leiden: Brill, 2023).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Yossef. ‘The Medieval Hebrew Translations of Dominicus Gundissalinus.’ In Latin-into-Hebrew: Studies and Texts, vol. 2. Edited by Fidora, Alexander, Hames, Harvey J. and Schwartz, Yossef, 1945. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Sebastián, San Cristóbal A. Controversias acerca de la voluntad desde 1270–1300. Madrid: 1958.Google Scholar
Sharp, Dorothea. Franciscan Philosophy at Oxford in the Thirteenth Century. New York: Russell and Russell, 1964.Google Scholar
Sileo, Leonardo. ‘I primi maestri francescani di Parigi e di Oxford.’ In Storia della teologia nel Medioevo 2: La grande fioritura. Edited by d’Onofrio, Giulio, 645–97. Casale Monferrato: Piemme, 1996.Google Scholar
Silva, José Filipe. ‘Medieval Theories of Active Perception: An Overview.’ In Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy. Edited by Silva, José Filipe and Yrjönsuuri, Mikko, 117–46. New York: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Silva, José Filipe. ‘The Chameleonic Mind: The Activity versus the Actuality of Perception.’ In Medieval Perceptual Puzzles: Theories of Sense Perception in the 13th and 14th Centuries. Edited by Baltuta, Elena, 3872. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Silva, José Filipe. ‘John Peckham’s Theory of Natural Cognition: Perception.’ In Early Thirteenth-Century English Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 283310. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. ‘Gregory IX and the Two Faces of the Soul.’ In Studies in Medieval Thought and Learning: From Abelard to Wyclif, 1720. London: The Hambledon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Smith, Lesley. ‘The Theological Framework.’ In The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. 4: 1100–1500. Edited by Rubin, Miri and Simons, Walter, 7388. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Smith, Lesley. ‘Hugh of St Cher and Medieval Collaboration.’ In Transforming Relations: Essays on Jews and Christians throughout History in Honor of Michael A. Signer. Edited by Harkins, Franklin T., 241–64. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Emotions and Peace of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Spatz, Nancy. ‘Approaches and Attitudes to a New Theology Textbook.’ In The Intellectual Climate of the Early University: Essays in Honor of Otto Gründler. Edited by Deusen, Nancy van, 2752. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1997.Google Scholar
Strand, Vincent. ‘The Ontology of Grace in Alexander of Hales and John of La Rochelle.’ In The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 171–92. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. ‘Augustine on Free Will.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, 166–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana. Les anges et la philosophie: Subjectivité et function cosmologique des substances séparées à la fin du XIIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin, 2002.Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana. Connaissance et langage des anges selon Thomas d’Aquin et Gilles de Rome. Paris: Vrin, 2003.Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard C.Remarks on Cogitatio in Averroes’ Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De anima Libros.’ In Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition. Edited by Endress, Gerhard and Aertsen, Jan A., 217–55. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
TeSelle, Eugene. ‘Background: Augustine and the Pelagian Controversy.’ In Grace after Grace. Edited by Hwang, Alexander Y., Brian Matz and Augustine Casiday, 113. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J.William of Auvergne’s Rejection of the Agent Intelligence.’ In Greek and Medieval Studies in Honor of Leo Sweeney, S.J., 211–35. New York: Peter Lang, 1995.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J.. ‘William of Auvergne’s Spiritualist Concept of the Human Being.’ In Autour de Guillaume d’Auvergne († 1249). Edited by Morenzoni, Franco and Tilliette, Jean-Yves, 3553. Turnhout: Brepols, 2005.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J.. Studies in the Philosophy of William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris 1228–1249. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J.. ‘William of Auvergne’s Debt to Avicenna’, in Roland J. Teske, Studies in the Philosophy of William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris. 1228–1249 (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2006), 21737.Google Scholar
Théry, G.L’authenticité du De spiritu et anima dans Saint Thomas et Albert le Grand.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 10 (1921): 373–77.Google Scholar
Théry, G.. Autour du décret de 1210: Alexandre d’Aphrodise: Aperçu sur l’influence de sa noétique. Paris: Le Salchoir, 1926.Google Scholar
Théry, G.. ‘L’Augustinisme médiéval et le problème de l’unité de la forme substantielle.’ Revue de Philosophie 1:660 (1930): 140200.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. New York, 1923.Google Scholar
Torrell, J.-P.Introduction.’ In Guerric of St Quentin, Quaestiones de quodlibet: A Critical Edition. Edited by Principe, Walter H.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar
Toth, Zita and Wood, Rega. ‘Nec idem nec aliud: The Powers of the Soul and the Origins of the Formal Distinction.’ In Early Thirteenth-Century English Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 171–97. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Trego, K. L’essence de la liberté: La refondation de l’éthique dans l’œuvre de S. Anselme de Cantorbéry. Paris: Vrin, 2010.Google Scholar
Trifogli, Cecilia. ‘The Creation of Matter in the Summa Halensis.’ In The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia, 1536. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Trottmann, Christian. ‘Science et sagesse dans la Summa de bono de Philippe le Chancelier.’ In Philippe le Chancelier: Prédicateur, théologien et poète parisien. Edited by Dahan, Gilbert and Rillon-Marne, Anne-Zoé, 149–68. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. Siger de Brabant d’après ses oeuvres inédites, Tome II: Siger dans l’histoire de l’aristotelésme. Louvain: Editions de l’Institut supérieur de Philosophie, 1942.Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. Aristote en Occident: Les origins de l’aristotélisme parisien. Paris: Éditions de l’Institut superior de philosophie, 1946.Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. La philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Deuxième édition mise à jour. Paris: Béatrice-Nauwelaerts, 1966; repr. Munich: F. Schöningh, 1977.Google Scholar
Van Steenberghen, Fernand. ‘Maître Siger de Brabant.’ Laval théologique et philosophique 35:1 (1979): 3112.Google Scholar
Vaux, Roland de. ‘La première entrée d’Averroës chez les Latins.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 22 (1933): 193245.Google Scholar
Vaux, Roland de. ‘Y-a-til eu un Avicennisme Latin?’ In Notes et textes sur l’avicennisme latin aux confins des XIIe-XIIIe siècles, 915. Paris: Vrin, 1934.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Silvana. ‘Passions de l’âme et péchés capitaux: Les ambigüités de la culture médiévale.’ In Laster im Mittelalter/Vices in the Middle Ages. Edited by Flueler, Christof and Rohde, Martin, 4564. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Silvana. ‘Passions et vertus dans la Summa de bono.’ In Philippe le Chancelier: Prédicateur, théologien et poète parisien du début du XIIIe siècle. Edited by Dahan, Gilbert and Rillon-Marne, Anne Zoe, 169–83. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Silvana. ‘Passions and Sins: The Summa Halensis and John of La Rochelle.’ In The Summa Halensis: Doctrines and Debates. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Verger, Jacques. ‘Hugues de Saint-Cher dans le context universitaire Parisien.’ In Hugues de Saint-Cher (d. 1263): Bibliste et théologien. Edited by Bataillon, Louis J., Dahan, Gilbert and Gy, Pierre-Marie, 1322. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.Google Scholar
Vogt, Bernard. ‘Der Ursprung und die Entwicklung der Franziskanerschule.’ Franziskanische Studien 9 (1922): 137–57.Google Scholar
Wei, Ian P. Intellectual Culture in Medieval Paris: Theologians and the University c. 1100–1330. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wei, Ian P.. Thinking about Animals in Thirteenth-Century Paris: Theologians on the Boundary Between Humans and Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.Albertus Magnus and Universal Hylomorphism: Avicebron – A Note on Thirteenth-Century Augustinianism.’ In Albert the Great: Commemorative Essays. Edited by Kovach, Francis J. and Shahan, Robert W., 239–60. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Wicki, Nikolaus. ‘Die intellectus agens-Lehre Philipps des Kanzlers (d. 1236).’ In Festschrift für Martin Anton Schmidt, 160–74. Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt, 1989.Google Scholar
Wicki, Nikolaus. Die Philosophie Philipps des Kanzlers: Ein philosophierender Theologe des frühen 13. Jahrhunderts. Fribourg: Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. Ethica-Scientia Practica: Die Anfänge der philosophischen Ethik im 13. Jahrhundert, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, 21. Münster: Aschendorff, 1981.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Judith Carol. ‘The Transmission and Influence of Questa ibn Luca’s On the Difference between Spirit and the Soul.’ PhD thesis, University of Michigan, 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, Steven J.Defining the Corpus Aristotelicum: Scholastic Awareness of Aristotelian Spuria in the High Middle Ages.’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 58 (1995): 2951.Google Scholar
Williams, Steven J.. ‘Repenser l’intention et l’effet des décrets de 1231 du pape Grégoire IX sur l’étude des libri naturales d’Aristote à l’Université de Paris.’ In L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du ‘Guide de l’étudiant’ du ms. Ripoll 109. Edited by Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, Joanne, 139–63. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, Steven J.. ‘Aristotle in the Medieval Classroom: Students, Teaching, and Educational Change in the Schools of Paris in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries.’ In The Classics in the Medieval and Renaissance Classroom: The Role of Ancient Texts in the Arts Curriculum as Revealed by Surviving Manuscripts and Early Printed Books. Edited by Ruys, Juanita Feros, John O. Ward and Melanie Heyworth, 223–43. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013.Google Scholar
Wilpert, Paul. ‘Die Ausgestaltung der aristotelischen Lehre vom Intellectus agens bei den griechischen Kommentatoren und in der Scholastik des 13. Jahrhunderts.’ Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Band 13, Heft 1 (1935): 447–62.Google Scholar
Wilpert, Paul. ‘Die Ausgestaltung der aristotelischen Lehre vom Intellectus agens bei den griechischen Kommentatoren und in der Scholastik des 13. Jahrhunderts.’ In Aus der Geisteswelt des Mittelalters: Studien und Texte: Martin Grabmann zur Vollendung des 60. Lebensjahres von Freunden und Schülern gewidmet. Edited by Lang, Albert, Lechner, Josef and Schmaus, Michael, 447–62. Münster: Aschendorff, 1935.Google Scholar
Wilshire, Leland Edward. ‘The Condemnations of 1277 and the Intellectual Climate of the Medieval University.’ In The Intellectual Climate of the Early University. Edited by Deusen, Nancy Van, 151–94. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
Wirmer, David. Averroes: Über den Intellekt: Auszüge aus seinen drei Kommentaren zu Aristoteles’ De anima. Herder: Freiburg i. B., 2008.Google Scholar
Wittmann, M. Die Stellung des hl. Thomas von Aquin zu Avencebrol (Ibn Gebirol). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Band 1, Heft 32. Münster: Aschendorff, 1900.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A.The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic and Hebrew Philosophic Texts.’ Harvard Theological Review 28:2 (1935): 70133.Google Scholar
Wood, Jacob W.Kataphasis and Apophasis in Thirteenth Century Theology: The Anthropological Context of the Triplex Via in the Summa fratris Alexandri and Albert the Great.’ The Heythrop Journal 57 (2016): 293311.Google Scholar
Wulf, Maurice De. ‘Le traité De unitate formae de Gilles de Lessines (Texte inédit et étude).’ In Les Philosophes Belges, 1082. Institut Supérior de Philosophie de l’Université, 1901.Google Scholar
Young, Spencer. Scholarly Community at the Early University of Paris: Theologians, Education and Society, 1215–1248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. ‘John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis: The Use of Greek Patristic Thought in the Treatment of the Incarnation.’ In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context, 91116. Edited by Schumacher, Lydia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Zavalloni, Roberto. Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des forms. Louvain: Editions de l’Institut superieur de philosophie, 1951.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene. ‘La boulesis nella psicologia dell’agire morale della prima metà del XIII secolo.’ In Il desiderio nel Medioevo. Edited by Palazzo, A., 133–50. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2014.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene. ‘Voluntas est duplex: La dottrina della voluntà dell’anonimo commentario di Parigi sull’ethica Nova e Vetus (1235–40).’ Medioevo 40 (2015): 6596.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene. ‘Liberum arbitrium est facultas voluntarios et rationis: Sulla definizione de libero arbitrio all’inizio del Duecento.’ In Libertà e determinismo: Riflessioni medievali. Edited by Leone, Marialucrezia and Valente, Luisa, 143–69. Venice: Gioacchino Onorati, 2017.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene. ‘Le début de la réception de l’Éthique à Nicomaque à Paris: Maîtres dès arts et théologiens in comparaison.’ Annuaire de l’Ecole pratique des hautes études (2019): 295–304.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene. ‘Scienza teologica, dottrina dell’anama, libero arbitrio: Il pensiero francescano all’università di Parigi nella prima metà del XIII secolo.’ In Trilogia Bonaventuriana. Edited by Pandolfi, Carmelo and Pascual, Rafael, 303–26. Rome: Ateneo Pontificio, 2020.Google Scholar
Zedler, Beatrice H.Problem: Averroes on the Possible Intellect.’ Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 25 (1951): 164–78.Google Scholar