Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-sbrr8 Total loading time: 0.581 Render date: 2022-01-21T10:03:47.018Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

21 - Alien Species in the Hudson River

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

David. L. Strayer
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Jeffrey S. Levinton
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access

Summary

abstract Like most estuaries, the Hudson has been heavily invaded by alien species (those moved out of their native ranges by human activities). The Hudson and its tributaries now contain more than 100 alien species, which are abundant in every habitat in the basin. Invasions of the freshwater part of the basin (aliens in brackish waters of the basin have not been systematically studied) were underway by the early nineteenth century, and continue at a rate of ∼7 new species per decade. Most of these species came from Europe or the Great Lakes through shipping activities, the Erie Canal, or deliberate introductions. Case studies of selected aliens (the zebra mussel, black bass, water-chestnut, Atlantic rangia, and Asian shore crab) show that alien species have had large and varied ecological impacts on all parts of the Hudson estuary. The impacts of alien species on the Hudson are likely to increase in the future as new aliens become established. We may be able to reduce future undesirable impacts of aliens on the Hudson by controlling or eradicating undesirable species, in the few cases where this is feasible; aggressively reducing the numbers of alien species that are inadvertently transported by human activities; and adopting more stringent criteria for allowing the intentional introduction of species.

Introduction

Most people know that humans have deeply affected the Earth's ecosystems by pollution, changes in land use, and overharvesting of wild plants and animals.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Hudson River Estuary , pp. 296 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cain, T. D. 1975. Reproduction and recruitment of the brackish water clam Rangia cuneata in the James River, Virginia. United States National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 73: 412–30Google Scholar
Caraco, N. F., and Cole, J. J. 2002. Contrasting impacts of a native and alien macrophyte on dissolved oxygen in a large river. Ecological Applications 12: 1496–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S. E. G., Fischer, D. T., Lampman, G. G., Pace, M. L., and Strayer, D. L. 2000. Dissolved oxygen declines in the Hudson River associated with the invasion of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Environmental Science and Technology 34: 1204–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Raymond, P. A., Strayer, D. L., Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Fischer, D. T. 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78: 588–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, D. M. 1992. Importance of winter refugia to the largemouth bass fishery in the Hudson River estuary. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 7: 173–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J. T. 1992. Introduced marine and estuarine mollusks of North America: an end-of-the-20th-century perspective. Journal of Shellfish Research 11: 489–505Google Scholar
Carlton, J. T. 1996. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77: 1653–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J. T., and Geller, J. B. 1993. Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J. T., and Holohan, B. A. (compilers). 1998. USA Ballast Book: Ballast Research in the United States of AmericaMaritime Studies Program, Williams College – Mystic Seaport. 204 ppGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., and Kitchell, J. F. (eds.). 1993. The Trophic Cascade in LakesCambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlebois, P. M., Marsden, J. E., Goettel, R. G., Wolfe, R. K., Jude, D. J., and Rudnika, S. 1997. The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas), a review of European and North American literature. Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Program and Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 20: 1–76Google Scholar
Cheney, A. N. 1895. Black bass and their distribution in the waters of the state of New York. Annual Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries, Game, and Forests of the State of New York, pp. 176–84
Cohen, A. N., and Carlton, J. T. 1997. Transoceanic transport mechanisms: introduction of the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis, to California. Pacific Science 51: 1–11Google Scholar
Cohen, A. N., and Carlton, J. T. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G. W. 1999. Alien Species in North America and HawaiiWashington, DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
Crossman, E. J., and Cudmore, B. C. 1999a. Summary of North American fish introductions through the aquarium/horticulture trade, in Claudi, R. and Leach, J. H. (eds.). Nonindigenous Freshwater Organisms: Vectors, Biology, and Impacts. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 129–33Google Scholar
Crossman, E. J., and Cudmore, B. C. 1999b. Summary of North American fish introductions through the aquaculture vector and related human activities, in Claudi, R., and Leach, J. H. (eds.). Nonindigenous Freshwater Organisms: Vectors, Biology, and Impacts, Boca Raton. FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 297–303Google Scholar
Dermott, R., Witt, J., Um, Y. M., and Gonzalez, M. 1998. Distribution of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus in the Great Lakes and replacement of native Gammarus fasciatus. Journal of Great Lakes Research 24: 442–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, D. 2001. Will black carp be the next zebra mussel?Science 292: 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, S., Pace, M. L., and Fischer, D. T. 1998. Response of heterotrophic planktonic bacteria to the zebra mussel invasion of the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Microbial Ecology 36: 131–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Findlay, S., Schoeberl, K., and Wagner, B. 1989. Abundance, composition, and dynamics of the invertebrate fauna of a tidal freshwater wetland. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 140–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, P. L., Nico, L. G., and Williams, J. D. 1999. Nonindigenous Fishes Introduced into Inland Waters of the United States American Fisheries Society Special Publication 27Google Scholar
Gilcrest, W. R., and Schmidt, R. E. 1998. Comparison of fish communities in open and occluded freshwater tidal wetlands in the Hudson River estuary, in Waldman, J. R. and Nieder, W. C. (eds.). Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program for 1997. New York: Hudson River Foundation, pp.IX-1 to IX-32Google Scholar
Goodchild, C. D. 1999. Ecological impacts of introductions associated with the use of live baitfish, in Claudi, R. and Leach, J. H. (eds.). Nonindigenous Freshwater Organisms: Vectors, Biology, and Impacts. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 181–200Google Scholar
Green, D. M., Landsberger, S. E., Nack, S. B., Bunnell, D., and Forney, J. L. 1993. Abundance and Winter Distribution of Hudson River Black Bass Final report to the Hudson River Foundation on grants 001/88B and 009/91A. 49 ppGoogle Scholar
Grosholz, E. D., and Ruiz, G. M. 1996. Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab Carcinus maenus. Biological Conservation 78: 59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. O., Tank, J. L., and Dybdahl, M. F. 2003. Exotic snails dominate nitrogen and carbon cycling in a highly productive stream. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankin, N., and Schmidt, R. E. 1992. Standing crop of fishes in water celery beds in the tidal Hudson River, in Waldman, J. R. and Blair, E. A. (eds.). Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program for 1991. New York: Hudson River Foundation, pp.VIII-1 to VIII-23Google Scholar
Hebert, P. D. N., Muncaster, B.W, and Mackie, G. L. 1989. Ecological and genetic studies on Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas): a new mollusc in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 1587–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henneman, M. L., and Memmott, J. 2001. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science 293: 1314–1316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, S. H., and Andrews, J. D. 1970. Rangia cuneata on the East Coast: thousand mile range extension, or resurgence. Science 167: 868–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, G. C., McDonald, P. S., and Armstrong, D. A. 2002. East meets west: competitive interactions between green crab Carcinus maenus and native and introduced shore crab Hemigrapsus spp. Marine Ecology Progress Series 225: 251–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiviat, E. 1978. Hudson River East Bank Natural Areas, Clermont to NorrieArlington, VA: The Nature ConservancyGoogle Scholar
Kiviat, E. 1993. Under the spreading water-chestnut. News from Hudsonia 9(1): 1–6Google Scholar
LaSalle, M. W., and Cruz, A. A. 1985. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (Gulf of Mexico) – common rangia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report. 82 (11.31). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82–4. 16 ppGoogle Scholar
Ledesma, M. E., and O'Connor, N.J. 2001. Habitat and diet of the non-native crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus in southeastern New England. Northeastern Naturalist 8: 63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lints, D., Findlay, S., and Pace, M. 1992. Biomass and energetics of consumers in the lower food web of the Hudson River, in Smith, C. L. (ed.). Estuarine Research in the 1980's. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 446–57Google Scholar
Litvak, M. K., and Mandrak, N. E. 1999. Baitfish trade as a vector of aquatic introductions, in Claudi, R. and Leach, J. H. (eds.). Nonindigenous freshwater organisms: vectors, biology, and impacts. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 163–80Google Scholar
Llanso, R., Southerland, M., V⊘lstad, J., Strebel, D., Mercurio, G., Barbour, M., and Gerritsen, J. 2001. Hudson River Estuary Biocriteria: Results Report for Year 2000 Report to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
Lohrer, A. M., and Whitlatch, R. B. 1997. Ecological studies on the recently introduced Japanese shore crab (Hemigrapsus sanguineus), in eastern Long Island Sound, in Balcom, N. C. (ed.). Proceedings of the Second Northeast Conference on Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Species. Connecticut Sea Grant Publication CTSG 97–02, pp. 49–60Google Scholar
Lohrer, A. M., and Whitlatch, R. B. 2002a. Interactions among aliens: apparent replacement of one exotic species by another. Ecology 83: 719–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohrer, A. M., and Whitlatch, R. B. 2002b. Relative impacts of two exotic brachyuran species on blue mussel populations in Long Island Sound. Marine Ecology Progress Series 227: 135–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, G. L. 1999. Mollusc introductions through aquarium trade, in Claudi, R. and Leach, J. H. (eds.). Nonindigenous Freshwater Organisms: Vectors, Biology, and Impacts. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 135–49Google Scholar
Malecki, R. A., Blossey, B., Hight, S. D., Schroeder, D., Kok, L. T., and Coulson, J. R. 1993. Biological control of purple loosestrife. BioScience 43: 680–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, J. J. 1998a. The western Pacific brachyuran (Hemigrapsus sanguineus: Grapsidae), in its new habitat along the Atlantic coast of the United States: geographic distribution and ecology. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55: 289–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, J. J. 1998b. The western Pacific brachyuran Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Grapsidae) in its new habitat along the Atlantic coast of the United States: reproduction. Journal of Crustacean Biology 18: 308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, E. L., Leach, J. H., Carlton, J. T., and Secor, C. L. 1993. Exotic species in the Great Lakes: a history of biotic crises and anthropogenic introductions. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19: 1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, E. L., Scheuerell, M. D., Carlton, J. T., and Strayer, D. L. 1997. Biological invasions in the Hudson River basin: an inventory and historical analysis. Circular of the New York State Museum 57: 1–51Google Scholar
Mills, E. L., Strayer, D. L., Scheuerell, M. D., and Carlton, J. T. 1996. Exotic species in the Hudson River basin: a history of invasions and introductions. Estuaries 19: 814–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, D. P., Karatayev, A. Y., Burlakova, L. E., Kurandina, D. P., and Laruelle, F. 1997. Natural enemies of zebra mussels: predators, parasites, and ecological competitors. Reviews in Fishery Science 5: 27–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nack, S. B., Bunnell, D., Green, D. M., and Forney, J. L. 1993. Spawning and nursery habitats of largemouth bass in the tidal Hudson River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122: 208–2162.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1996. Stemming the Tide: Controlling Introductions of Nonindigenous Species by Ships' Ballast WaterWashington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press, 141 pp
Nico, L. G., and Williams, J. D., 1996. Risk Assessment on Black Carp (Pisces: Cyprinidae) Report to the Risk Assessment and Management Committee of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Harmful Nonindigenous Species in the United States Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC
Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Fischer, D. 1998. Effects of an invasive bivalve on the zooplankton community of the Hudson River. Freshwater Biology 39: 103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffen, B. G. P., Brink, F. W. B., Velde, G., and bij de Vaate, A. 1994. The population explosion of the amphipod Corophium curvispinosum in the Dutch lower Rhine. Water Science and Technology 29: 53–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelczarski, K., and Schmidt, R. E. 1991. Evaluation of a pop net for sampling fishes from water-chestnut beds in the tidal Hudson River, in Blair, E. A. and Waldman, J. R. (eds.). Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program for 1990. New York: Hudson River Foundation, pp.V-1 to V-33Google Scholar
Revkin, A. C. 1999. Making up their beds and hoping the oysters will move in. The New York Times, 24 June 1999, pp. B1, B5
Robbins, W. H., and MacCrimmon, H. R. 1974. The Black Bass in America and Overseas Ontario Canada Biomanagement and Research Enterprises. 196 ppGoogle Scholar
Ruesink, J. L., Parker, I. M., Groom, M. J., and Kareiva, P. M. 1995. Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introductions: guilty until proven innocent. BioScience 45: 465–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, G. M., Fofonoff, P., Hines, A. H., and Grosholz, E. D. 1999. Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 950–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. E., Anderson, A. B., and Limburg, K. 1992. Dynamics of larval fish populations in a Hudson River tidal marsh, in Smith, C. L. (ed.). Estuarine Research in the 1980s. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 458–75Google Scholar
Smith, C. L. 1985. The Inland Fishes of New York State New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. E., Stevenson, R. J., Caraco, N. F., and Cole, J. J. 1998. Changes in phytoplankton community structure during the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion of the Hudson River. Journal of Plankton Research 20: 1567–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M. L. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves: a case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. BioScience 49: 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Hattala, K., and Kahnle, A. 2004. Effects of an invasive bivalve (Dreissena polymorpha) on fish populations in the Hudson River estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:924–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Lutz, C., Malcom, H. M., Munger, K., and Shaw, W. H. 2003. Invertebrate communities associated with a native (Vallisneria americana) and an alien (Trapa natans) macrophyte in a large river. Freshwater Biology 48: 1938–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Powell, J., Ambrose, P., Smith, L. C., Pace, M. L., and Fischer, D. T. 1996. Arrival, spread, and early dynamics of a zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population in the Hudson River estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 1143–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., and Smith, L. C. 1996. Relationships between zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and unionid clams during the early stages of the zebra mussel invasion of the Hudson River. Freshwater Biology 36: 771–9Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., and Smith, L. C. 2001. The zoobenthos of the freshwater tidal Hudson River and its response to the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplementband 139: 1–52Google Scholar
Strong, D. R., and Pemberton, R. W. 2000. Biological control of invading species – risk and reform. Science 288: 1969–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, C. R., and Winterbourne, M. J. 1992. Assessment of the risk posed by an exotic fish: the proposed introduction of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) to New Zealand. Conservation Biology 6: 273–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, F. W. B., Velde, G., and bij de Vaate, A. 1993. Ecological aspects, explosive range extension and impact of a mass invader, Corophium curvispinosum, in the lower Rhine (The Netherlands). Oecologia 93: 224–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., and Westbrooks, R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 469–78Google Scholar
Williams, T. 2001. Want another carp? Fly Rod and Reel, June 2001. http://www.flyrodreel.com/archive/consvarch/conservation0601.html
5
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×