Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gbqfq Total loading time: 0.723 Render date: 2022-05-16T16:08:43.018Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2018

Arash Abizadeh
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans. 1982. From Locke to Saussure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2011. “Hobbes on the Causes of War.” American Political Science Review 105.2:298315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2013. “Leviathan as Mythology.” In Hobbes Today, ed. Lloyd, S. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2015. “The Absence of Reference in Hobbes’s Philosophy of Language.” Philosophers’ Imprint 15.22:117.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2016. “Sovereign Jurisdiction, Territorial Rights, and Membership in Hobbes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P and Hoekstra, K.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2017a. “Hobbes’s Conventionalist Theology, the Trinity, and God as an Artificial Person by Fiction.” The Historical Journal 60.4:915941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2017b. “Hobbes on Mind.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55.1:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2017c. “Hobbes’s Agnostic Theology before Leviathan.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47.5:714737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. In progress. “Subjectivism, Instrumentalism, and Prudentialism about Reasons.”
Annas, Julia. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33.124:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1972. “Warrender and His Critics.” In Hobbes and Rousseau, ed. Cranston, M. and Peters, R. S. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah. 1983. “Subjects and Soldiers.” History of Political Thought 4.1:4364.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2016. “Reason, Deliberation, and the Passions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P and Hoekstra, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian 2017. “Interpreting Texts.” In Methods in Analytical Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbio, Noberto. 1993. Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boonin-Vail, David. 1994. Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Frithiof. 1927. Thomas Hobbes’ Mechanical Conception of Nature. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. 1992. Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 1994. “Discounting the Future.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 23.2:128156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 2005. “Does Rationality Give us Reasons?Philosophical Issues 15.1:321337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 2007a. “Is Rationality Normative?Disputatio 2.23:161178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 2007b. “Wide or Narrow Scope?Mind 116.462:359370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 2013. Rationality Through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1992. “Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible?” In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A. O. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor. 2005. “The Spirit and the Letter.” In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics, ed. Salles, R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1996. “Reason, Humanity, and the Moral Law.” In The Sources of Normativity, ed. O’Neill, O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Copp, David. 1980. “Hobbes on Artificial Persons and Collective Actions.” The Philosophical Review 89.4:579606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim. 2001. Elements of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 2006. Reasons and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, Alan. 2011. “The Elements and Hobbesian Moral Thinking.” History of Political Thought 32.1:2147.Google Scholar
Cuffaro, Michael. 2011. “On Thomas Hobbes’s Fallible Natural Law Theory.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 28.2:175190.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. 2004. “The Covenant with God in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” In Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Sorell, T. and Foisneau, L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1983. Impartial Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1992. “Internalism and Agency.” Philosophical Perspectives 6:155174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1995. The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1998. Philosophical Ethics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2000. “Normativity and Projection in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” The Philosophical Review 109.3:313347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2009. The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2012. “Grotius at the Creation of Modern Moral Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94.3:296325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, Willem. 1986. “Hobbes’s Logic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 7.2:123142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deigh, John. 1996. “Reason and Ethics in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34.1:3360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. 2001. Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2001. “Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law.” Law and Philosophy 20.5:461498.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2010. “Hobbes’s Constitutional Theory.” In Leviathan, ed. Shapiro, I.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2012. “Hobbes on the Authority of Law.” In Hobbes and the Law, ed. Dyzenhaus, D. and Poole, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Srul. 1959. The Philosophy of Language in Hobbes and Locke. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Engel, Srul. 1962. “Analogy and Equivocation in Hobbes.” Philosophy 37.142:326335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1965. “The Expressive Function of Punishment.” The Monist 49.3:397423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, Ralph. 1990. Thomas Hobbes’ Theory of Obligation. Wakefield: Longwood Academic.Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan. 2012. “Hobbes’s Relational Theory.” In Hobbes and the Law, ed. Dyzenhaus, D. and Poole, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedle, Simon. 2012. Thomas Hobbes and the Reception of Early-Modern Epicureanism. PhD Thesis, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge.
Frost, Samantha. 2008. Lessons from a Materialist Thinker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. 1969. The Morality of Law. Revised ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. 2013. “Seventeenth-Century Moral Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, ed. Crisp, R.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. 2010. “Religion and Representation in Hobbes.” In Leviathan, ed. Shapiro, I.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1979. “Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist.” The Journal of Philosophy 76.10:547559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1962. Reference and Generality. Ithica: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1965. “Hobbes, Mechanism, and Egoism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 15.61:341349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1967. “Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 28.4:503520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 2001. “Hobbes on Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82.3–4:243257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Martha. 2004. From Naming to Saying. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorldberg, John, and Zipursky, Benjamin. 2010. “Torts as Wrongs.” Texas Law Review 88.5:917986.Google Scholar
Green, Michael. 2015. “Authorization and Political Authority in Hobbes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53.1:2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1968. “Utterer’s Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning.” Foundations of Language 4.3:225242.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 2006. The Emergence of Probability. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1992. “Hobbes and Ethical Naturalism.” Philosophical Perspectives 6:333353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1998. The Authority of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The Nature of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2008. Punishment and Responsibility. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, Chris. 2005. “The Problem of Defective Desires.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83.4:487504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. 1997. “Hobbes and the Foole.” Political Theory 25.5:620654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. 2003. “Hobbes on Law, Nature, and Reason.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41.1:111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1964. Fundamental Legal Conceptions, as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Ed. Cook, W. W. New ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. 2004. The Architecture of Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Thomas. 2015. “Hobbes’s First Cause.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53.4:647667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Thomas. 2016. “Hobbes on the Function of Evaluative Speech.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46.1:123144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubin, Donald C. 1999. “What’s Special about Humeanism.” Noûs 33.1:3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungerland, Isabel, and Vick, George. 1981. “Hobbes’s Theory of Language, Speech, and Reasoning.” In Computatio Sive Logica, ed. Hungerland, I. and Vick, G.. Norwalk: Abaris Books.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence. 2008. The Development of Ethics: Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Nicholas D. 2007. Hobbes, Bramhall and the Politics of Liberty and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 1996. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorell, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 1999. Squaring the Circle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 2010. “Scientia in Hobbes.” In Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Sorell, T., Rogers, G. A and Kraye, J.. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. 1985. Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. 1970. Ethical Naturalism. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesewetter, Benjamin. 2015. “Instrumental Normativity.” Ethics 125.4:921946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. 2005. “Why Be Rational?Mind 114.455:509563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996a. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996b. The Sources of Normativity. Ed. O’Neill, O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2007. “Autonomy and the Second Person Within.” Ethics 118.1:823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2008. “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.” In The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. 2008. “Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E. N. Fall 2008 ed.
LeBar, Mark. 2009. “Virtue Ethics and Deontic Constraints.” Ethics 119.4:642671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijenhorst, Cees. 2002. The Mechanisation of Aristotelianism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lin, Eden. 2018. “Asymmetrism about Desire Satisfaction and Time.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics Volume 7, ed. Timmons, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 1992. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2009. Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losonsky, Michael. 2001. Enlightenment and Action from Descartes to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, Tommy. 1982. “Hobbes’s Mechanistic Psychology.” In Thomas Hobbes, ed. van der Bend, J. G. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B. V.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. 2002. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 1992. The Two Gods of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2005. Hobbes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2016. “Authorization and Representation in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P and Hoekstra, K.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. 1990. “Hobbes, la Trinité et les caprices de la représentation.” In Thomas Hobbes, ed. Zarka, Y. C and Bernhardt, J.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
May, Simon Căbulea. 2012. “Moral Status and the Direction of Duties.” Ethics 123.1:113128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeilly, F.S. 1968. The Anatomy of Leviathan. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, Ernest. 1997. “Actions.” In A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, C. D. 2013. “Hobbes and the Rationality of Self-Preservation.” The European Legacy 18.3:269286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Alexander. 2003. An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, Samuel. 1969. The Hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip. 1988. Epicurus’ Ethical Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1922. “The Nature of Moral Philosophy.” In Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark. 1994. “Deviant Uses of ‘Obligation’ in Hobbes’ Leviathan.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 11.3:281294.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark. 1995. “Was Hobbes a Legal Positivist?Ethics 105.4:846873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark. 2000. “Hobbes on the Evil of Death.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82.1:3661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1959. “Hobbes’s Concept of Obligation.” The Philosophical Review 68.1:6883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel. 1983. Judgment and Proposition. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1946. “Introduction.” In Leviathan. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan. 2014. “Worse than Death.” Hobbes Studies 27.2:148170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan. 2015. “Why Justice and Injustice Have No Place Outside the Hobbesian State.” European Journal of Political Theory 14.1:1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Walter. 2004. Locke’s Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paganini, Gianni. 2012. “‘Passionate Thought’: Reason and the Passion of Curiosity in Thomas Hobbes.” In Emotional Minds, ed. Ebbsermeyer, S.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon. 2007. Taming the Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patin, Gui. 1846. Lettres de Gui Patin: Nouvelle édition augmentée de lettres inédites. Ed. Reveillé-Parise, J.-H. Vol. 2. Paris: J.-B. Ballière.Google Scholar
Pécharman, Martine. 1992. “Le Discours mental selon Hobbes.” Archives de Philosophie 55.4:553573.Google Scholar
Peters, Richard. 1956. Hobbes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2008. Made with Words. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas. 2004. “Suarez, Hobbes and the Scholastic Tradition in Action Theory.” In The Will and Human Action, ed. Pink, T. and Stone, M. W. F. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas. 2010. “Thomas Hobbes.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, ed. O’Connor, T. and Sandis, C.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas. 2011. “Thomas Hobbes and the Ethics of Freedom.” Inquiry 54.5:541563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John. 1965. “Mr. Warrender’s Hobbes.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Brown, K. C. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1997. “Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes.” In Hobbes, ed. Dunn, J. and Harris, I.. Cheltenham: Edwin Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. 1989. “Naturalism and Prescriptivity.” Social Philosophy and Policy 7.01:151174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter. 1997. “On the Hypothetical and Non-Hypothetical in Reasoning about Belief and Action.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. Cullity, G. and Gaut, B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1977. Hobbes: Morals and Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2005. “The Myth of Instrumental Rationality.” Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 1.1:228.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1982. Will and Political Legitimacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 1987. “Foundationalism in Political Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 16.2:115137.Google Scholar
Ross, George MacDonald. 1987. “Hobbes’s Two Theories of Meaning.” In The Figural and the Literal, ed. Benjamin, A., Cantor, G., and Christie, J.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, David. 2000. “What Kind of Person Is Hobbes’s State?The Journal of Political Philosophy 8.2:268278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, David. 2009. “Hobbes’s Theory of Representation.” In Political Representation, ed. Shapiro, I., Stokes, S., Wood, E. J, and Kirshner, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 2003. “In Pursuit of Happiness.” Philosophical Topics 31.1/2:369393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 2012. “The End of Ends?” In The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarch, Alexander. 2013. “Desire Satisfactionism and Time.” Utilitas 25.2:221245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe Each Other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 2014. Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1988. “Wallifaction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19.3:275298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Mark. 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuhmann, Karl. 2004. “Phantasms and Idols.” Rivista di storia della filosofia 59.1:1531.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, David. 2011. “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability.” Ethics 121.3:602632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1896. Outlines of the History of Ethics for English Readers. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1988. Meaning and Context. Ed. Tully, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1999. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 7.1:129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics Volume III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2005. “Hobbes on Representation.” European Journal of Philosophy 13.2:155184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, John. 2007. “Internal Reasons and the Scope of Blame.” In Bernard Williams, ed. Thomas, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John. 2010. The Domain of Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella. 1998. “From Genus to Species.” History of Political Thought 19.4:552569.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella. 2007. “Hobbes on Glory and Civil Strife.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Springborg, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1961. “Free-Will, Praise and Blame.” Mind 70.279:291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Angela. 2005. “Responsibility for Attitudes.” Ethics 115.2:236271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Angela. 2007. “On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible.” The Journal of Ethics 11.4:465484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sobel, David. 2001. “Subjective Accounts of Reasons for Action.” Ethics 111.3:461492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 1974. “Body and Soul in Aristotle.” Philosophy 49.187:6389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorell, Tom. 1986. Hobbes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2010. Hobbes on Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, Gopal. 2010. “Duties and Their Direction.” Ethics 120.3:465494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffell, Brian. 1991. “Hobbes on Self-Preservation and Suicide.” Hobbes Studies 4.1:2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1963. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 2008. Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1965. “The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Brown, K. C. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2004. “What Is It to Wrong Someone?” In Reason and Value, ed. Wallace, R. J, Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tralau, Johan. 2011. “Hobbes contra Liberty of Conscience.” Political Theory 39.1:5884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1979. Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1987. “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law.” In The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. Pagden, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1988a. “Hobbes and Descartes.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, ed. Rogers, G. A. J and Ryan, A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1988b. “Optics and Sceptics.” In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe, ed. Leites, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1996. “Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorell, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tweedale, Martin. 1990. “Mental Representation in Later Medieval Scholasticism.” In Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed. Smith, J.-C. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
van Apeldoorn, Laurens. 2012. “Reconsidering Hobbes’s Account of Practical Deliberation.” Hobbes Studies 25.2:143165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, Mónica Brito. 2009. The Elements of Representation in Hobbes. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 1996. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard. 1957. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. 1955. “Philosophy and Politics in Hobbes.” The Philosophical Quarterly 5.19:125146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. 1973. Hobbes’s System of Ideas. 2nd ed. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Watson, Gary. 1996. “Two Faces of Responsibility.” Philosophical Topics 24.2:227248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. 2004. Agency and Answerability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David. 2013. Pleasure in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2006. Politics and Vision. Expanded ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Arthur. 2013. “A Hohfeldian Analysis of Hobbesian Rights.” Law and Philosophy 32.4:405434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles. 1996. “First Philosophy and the Foundations of Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorell, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles. 1999. La Décision métaphysique de Hobbes. 2nd expanded ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Arash Abizadeh, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics
  • Online publication: 18 October 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Arash Abizadeh, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics
  • Online publication: 18 October 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Arash Abizadeh, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics
  • Online publication: 18 October 2018
Available formats
×