Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
- PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
- 1 Studying the History of Archaeology
- 2 Classical and Other Text-Based Archaeologies
- 3 Antiquarianism without Texts
- 4 The Beginnings of Prehistoric Archaeology
- 5 Evolutionary Archaeology
- 6 Culture-Historical Archaeology
- 7 Early Functional-Processual Archaeology
- 8 Processualism and Postprocessualism
- 9 Pragmatic Synthesis
- 10 The Relevance of Archaeology
- BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY
- REFERENCES
- INDEX
8 - Processualism and Postprocessualism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
- PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
- 1 Studying the History of Archaeology
- 2 Classical and Other Text-Based Archaeologies
- 3 Antiquarianism without Texts
- 4 The Beginnings of Prehistoric Archaeology
- 5 Evolutionary Archaeology
- 6 Culture-Historical Archaeology
- 7 Early Functional-Processual Archaeology
- 8 Processualism and Postprocessualism
- 9 Pragmatic Synthesis
- 10 The Relevance of Archaeology
- BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY
- REFERENCES
- INDEX
Summary
I am unwilling to admit that the abundant literature published in the last fifteen years in praise of “archaeology as anthropology” … marks a turning point in the intellectual history of our discipline.
jean-claude gardin, Archaeological Constructs (1980), p. 29The proper analogy for human behaviour is not natural law – of a physical kind – but a game of chess.
edmund leach, “Concluding Address” (1973), p. 764In Europe and North America, culture-historical and functional-processual archaeology might have continued to develop alongside one another in a complementary fashion as they had done in the 1950s. Instead, in the early 1960s, a group of American processual archaeologists launched an all-out attack on culture-historical archaeology, which they proposed to replace with an approach that was evolutionist, behaviorist, ecological, and positivist in orientation. In the late 1980s, archaeologists, mainly in Britain, offered an equally dogmatic, culturally oriented postprocessual archaeology as a solution for what they proclaimed were processual archaeology's shortcomings. Neither option has lived up to its promise to solve all of archaeology's problems, although together they offer productive ways to consider many, but not all, of the questions archaeologists must address. In retrospect, these two antagonistic positions can be seen to reflect successive theoretical fashions in anthropology.
Neoevolutionism
The two decades following World War II were an era of unrivaled prosperity and unchallenged political power for the United States. Despite the threat of nuclear war, this also was a time of great optimism and self-confidence for middle-class Americans.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of Archaeological Thought , pp. 386 - 483Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006