Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-588bc86c8c-nxvjd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-01T04:49:13.731Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Section 6 - Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
University of Newcastle
Get access


Abdominal pain during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges, and the differential diagnoses are extensive.

High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 1523 - 1926
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Torloni, MR, Vadmedorska, N, Merialdi, M, et al. Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 599608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenn, MM, Coakley, FV, Kaimal, A, et al. Guidelines for computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 333–40.Google Scholar
Streffer, C, Shore, R, Konermann, G, et al. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2003; 33: 5206.Google ScholarPubMed
Karam, PA. Determining and reporting fatal radiation exposure from diagnostic radiation. Health Phys 2000; 79 (Suppl 5): 585–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappell, MS, Colon, VJ, Sidhom, OA. A study of 10 medical centres of the safety and efficacy of 48 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41: 2353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J, Price, R, Richardson, W, Fanelli, R. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3479–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reedy, MB, Galan, HL, Richards, WE, et al. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a survey of laparoendoscopic surgeons. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 33–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Oelsner, G, Stockheim, D, Soriano, D, et al. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopy or laparotomy in pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 200–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollins, MD, Chan, KJ, Price, RR. Laparoscopy for appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy: a new standard of care. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, CJ, Yen, CF, Lee, CL, Soong, YK. Minilaparoscopic cystectomy and appendectomy in late second trimester. JSLS 2002; 6: 373–5.Google ScholarPubMed
McKellar, DP, Anderson, CT, Boynton, CJ, Peoples, JB. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 465–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Casele, HL. The use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 895905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachman, E, Schienfield, A, Voss, E, et al. Pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatum, M, Rojanshy, N. Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001; 56: 50–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fardiazar, Z, Derakhshan, I, Torab, R, Vahedi, A, Goldust, M. Maternal-neonatal outcome in pregnancies with non-obstetric laparotomy during pregnancy. Pak J Biol Sci 2014; 17: 260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Pearl, M. Mini-laparotomy versus laparoscopy for gynecologic conditions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, JG. Uterine torsion in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salani, R, Theiler, RN, Lindsay, M. Uterine torsion and fetal bradycardia associated with external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 820–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setchell, M. Abdominal pain in pregnancy. In Studd, J (ed.), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 6. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp. 8999.Google Scholar
Yoneyama, K, Kimura, A, Kogo, M, et al. Clinical predictive factors for preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labour or preterm premature ruptured membranes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, CM, O’Neill, LM. Use of pelvic tilt exercise for ligament pain relief. J Nurse Midwifery 1994; 39: 370–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowswell, T, Neilson, JP. Interventions for heartburn in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD007065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, SK, O’Brien, L, Koren, G. The safety of histamine 2 (H2) blockers in pregnancy: A meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1835–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, F. Constipation in pregnancy. Pract Midwife 2008; 11: 2831.Google ScholarPubMed
Trash, HK, Friede, A, Hogue, CJ. Abdominal pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 333–6.Google Scholar
Aliyu, LD, Ashimi, AO. A multicenter study of advanced abdominal pregnancy: a review of six cases in low resource settings. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 33–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nkusu Nunyalulendho, D, Einterz, EM. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: case report and review of 163 cases reported since 1946. Rural Remote Health 2008; 8: 1087–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Worley, KC, Hnat, MD, Cunningham, FG. Advanced extrauterine pregnancy: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 297–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, K, Song, L, Wang, L, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: an increasingly challenging clinical concern for obstetricians. Int J Clin Pathol 2014; 7: 5461–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Sunday-Adeoye, I, Twoney, D, Egwuatu, EV, Okonta, PI. A 30 year review of advanced abdominal pregnancy at the Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Afikpo, south eastern Nigeria (1976–2006). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetinkaya, MB, Kokcu, A, Alper, T. Follow up of the regression of the placenta left in situ in an advanced abdominal pregnancy using the Cavaleiri method. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005; 31: 22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B, Nielson, TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 78: 758–62.Google Scholar
Andersson, RE, Lambe, M. Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1281–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, PL, Keller, JJ, Liang, HH, Lin, HC. Acute appendicitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1204–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracey, M, Fletcher, HS. Appendicitis in pregnancy. Am Surg 2000; 66: 555–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Lehnert, BE, Gross, JA, Linnau, KF, Moshiri, M. Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19: 293–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, GM, Malguria, N, McCarthy, S, Copel, J, Weinreb, J. MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 428–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coursey, CA, Nelson, RC, Patel, MB. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 2009; 254: 460–8.Google Scholar
Basaran, A, Basaran, M. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64: 481–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedrosa, I, Lafornara, M, Pandharipande, PV, et al. Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 2009; 250: 749–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corneille, MG, Gallup, TM, Bening, T, et al. The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 363–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang Y, , Zhao, YY, Qiao, J, Ye, RH. Diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and perinatal outcome in the late pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122: 521–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Eom, JM, Hong, JH, Jeon, SW, et al. Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pregnant Women with Acute Appendicitis. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012; 41: 82–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Chung, JC, Cho, GS, Shin, EJ, Kim, HC, Song, OP. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant women. Can J Surg 2013; 56: 341–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, HG, Samaraee, AA, Mills, SJ, Kalbassi, MR. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review of the published evidence. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 1235–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, H, Granger, S, Price, R, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1917–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, CA1, Tang, T, Walsh, SR. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 339–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerson, S, Holtz, T, Ehringreis, M, et al. Small bowel obstruction in pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 299302.Google ScholarPubMed
Rawlings, C. Management of postcaesarian Ogilvie’s syndrome and their subsequent outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 573–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CW, Beresford, SA, Schulte, SJ, Matsumoto, AM. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy. Hepatology 2005; 41: 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CW. Risk factors for gallstone-related hospitalization during pregnancy and the postpartum. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2263–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sang, SJ, Mayo, ML, Rodriguez-Frias, E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:453–61.Google Scholar
Othman, MO, Stone, E, Hashimi, M, Parasher, G. Conservative management of cholelithiasis and its complications in pregnancy is associated with recurrent symptoms and more emergency department visits. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 564–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Fan, C, Wang, S. Clinical analysis of 16 patients with acute pancreatitisin the third trimester of pregnancy Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013; 6: 1696–701.Google ScholarPubMed
Kayatas, SE, Eser, M, Cam, C, Cogendez, E, Guzin, K. Acute pancreatitis associated with hypertriglyceridemia: a life-threatening complication. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281: 427–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, SS, Lin, XZ, Tsai, YT, et al. Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical testsin the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study. Pancreas 1988; 3: 153–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, SJ, Mayo, MJ, Rodriguez-Frias, E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 453–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, A, Petrov, MS, Brooks, DC, et al. Acute pancreatitis and pregnancy: a 10-year single center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1623–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Date, RS, Kaushal, M, Ramesh, A. A review of the management of gallstone disease and its complications in pregnancy. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 599608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisan, LS, Steidl, ET, Rivera-Alsina, ME. Acute hyperlipidemic pancreatitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: e9.Google Scholar
Eddy, JJ, Gideonsen, MD, Song, JY, et al. Pancreatitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1075–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, R, Jacob, A, Brooks, H. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: review of three cases and anaesthetic management. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 360–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClave, SA. Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007; 36:6574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithson, A, Ruiz, J, Perello, R, et al. Diagnostic and management of spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma. Eur J Intern Med 2013; 24: 579–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasotakis, G. Retroperitoneal and rectus sheath hematomas. Surg Clin North Am 2014; 94: 71–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapelle, CF, Schutte, JM, Schuitemaker, NW, Steegers, EAP, van Roosmalen, J. Maternal mortality attributable to vascular dissection and rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide confidential enquiry BJOG 2012; 119: 8693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubrey-Bassler, FK, Sowers, N. 613 cases of splenic rupture without risk factors or previously diagnosed disease: a systematic review. BMC Emerg Med 2012; 12: 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, PN, Madeley, RJ, Symonds, EM. Abdominal pain of unknown aetiology in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 688–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed


Glanc, P, Brofman, N, Salem, S, et al. The prevalence of incidental simple ovarian cysts ≥ 3 cm detected by transvaginal sonography in early pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 502–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sergent, F, Verspyck, E, Marpeau, L. [Management of an ovarian cyst during pregnancy]. Presse Med 2003; 32: 1039–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Zanetta, G, Mariani, E, Lissoni, A, et al. A prospective study of the role of ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. BJOG 2003; 110: 578–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, KY, Johnson, JL, Kay, HH. Simple ovarian cysts: clinical features on a first-trimester ultrasound scan. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 440–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Goffinet, F. [Ovarian cysts and pregnancy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2001; 30 (1 Suppl): S100–8.Google Scholar
Yen, CF, Lin, SL, Murk, W, et al. Risk analysis of torsion and malignancy for adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1895–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szecsi, PB, Andersen, MR, Bjørngaard, B, Hedengran, KK, Stender, S. Cancer antigen 125 after delivery in women with a normal pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 1295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derchi, LE, Serafini, G, Gandolfo, N, Gandolfo, NG, Martinoli, C. Ultrasound in gynecology. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2137–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherard, GB, Hodson, CA, Williams, HJ, et al. Adnexal masses and pregnancy: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 358–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usui, R, Minakami, H, Kosuge, S, et al. A retrospective survey of clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of adnexal masses operated on during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2000; 26: 8993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, LM, Connors-Beatty, DJ, Nowak, A, Tush, B. The role of ultrasonography in the detection and management of adnexal masses during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 703–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, SB, Oelsner, G, Seidman, DS, et al. Laparoscopic detorsion allows sparing of the twisted ischemic adnexa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 139–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuen, PM, Chang, AM. Laparoscopic management of adnexal mass during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 173–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balci, O, Gezginc, K, Karatayli, R, et al. Management and outcomes of adnexal masses during pregnancy: a 6-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34: 524–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, B, Ben-Arie, A, Appelman, Z, Or, Y, Hagay, Z. Aspiration of simple pelvic cysts during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000; 49: 102–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanc, P, Salem, S, Farine, D. Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q 2008; 24: 225–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H, Yoshida, A, Kobayashi, M, Yamada, T. Changes in size of the functional cyst on ultrasonography during early pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 1997; 14: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1212–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobelt, N, Ghidini, A, Cavallone, M, et al. Natural history of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 399401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laughlin, SK, Baird, DD, Savitz, DA, Herring, AH, Hartmann, KE. Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 630–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qidwai, GI, Caughey, AB, Jacoby, AF. Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 376–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winer-Muram, HT, Muram, D, Gillieson, MS. Uterine myomas in pregnancy. J Can Assoc Radiol 1984; 35: 168–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosati, P, Exacoustos, C, Mancuso, S. Longitudinal evaluation of uterine myoma growth during pregnancy. A sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 511–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aharoni, A, Reiter, A, Golan, D, Paltiely, Y, Sharf, M. Patterns of growth of uterine leiomyomas during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 510–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatsky, PC, Tran, ND, Caughey, AB, Fujimoto, VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 357–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, SJ, Best, S, Kumar, S. The impact of fibroid characteristics on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 395.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coronado, GD, Marshall, LM, Schwartz, SM. Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 764–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Exacoustos, C, Rosati, P. Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 97101.Google ScholarPubMed
Vergani, P, Ghidini, A, Strobelt, N, et al. Do uterine leiomyomas influence pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 356–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritts, EA, Parker, WH, Olive, DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carranza-Mamane, B, Havelock, J, Hemmings, R, et al. The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37: 277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chittawar, PW, Franik, S, Pouwer, AW, Farquhar, C. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10): CD004638.Google Scholar
Roberts, WE, Fulp, KS, Morrison, JC, Martin, JN. The impact of leiomyomas on pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 39: 43–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narayan, R, Rajat, , Goswamy, K. Treatment of submucous fibroids, and outcome of assisted conception. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1: 307–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koike, T, Minakami, H, Kosuge, S, et al. Uterine leiomyoma in pregnancy: its influence on obstetric performance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1999; 25: 309–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celik, C, Acar, A, Ciçek, N, Gezginc, K, Akyürek, C. Can myomectomy be performed during pregnancy? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53: 7983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonito, M, Gulemì, L, Basili, R, Roselli, D. Myomectomy during the first and second trimester of pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2007; 34: 149–50.Google ScholarPubMed
De Carolis, S, Fatigante, G, Ferrazzani, S, et al. Uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 116–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittich, AC, Salminen, ER, Yancey, MK, Markenson, GR. Myomectomy during early pregnancy. Mil Med 2000; 165: 162–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mollica, G, Pittini, L, Minganti, E, Perri, G, Pansini, F. Elective uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1996; 23: 168–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Phelan, JP. Myomas and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 801–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, CE. Myomectomy: comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 407–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgakopoulos, PA, Bersis, G. Sigmoido-uterine rupture in pregnancy after multiple myomectomy. Int Surg 1981; 66: 367–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, AB, Chamberlain, R, Te Linde, RW. Myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1956; 71: 759–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C. The “cons” of laparoscopic myomectomy in women who may reproduce in the future. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1996; 41: 280–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsunaga, JS, Daly, CB, Bochner, CJ, Agnew, CL. Repair of uterine dehiscence with continuation of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1211–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubuisso, JB, Fauconnier, A, Babaki-Fard, K, Chapron, C. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 588–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Tian, YC, Long, TF, Dai, YM. Pregnancy outcomes following different surgical approaches of myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41: 350–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Serehi, A, Mhoyan, A, Brown, M, et al. Placenta accreta: an association with fibroids and Asherman syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 1623–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA, Nygren, KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1506–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupas, C, Christin-Maitre, S. [What are the factors affecting fertility in 2008?] Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2008; 69 (Suppl 1): S57–61.Google Scholar
Snick, HK, Snick, TS, Evers, JL, Collins, JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1582–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evers, JL. Female subfertility. Lancet 2002; 360: 151–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigorescu, V, Zhang, Y, Kissin, DM, et al. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis: ovulatory dysfunction versus tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1019–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, S, Shetty, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S, Maheshwari, A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 485503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziadeh, SM, Zakaria, MR, Abu-Hieja, A. Pregnancy rates using CC/hMG or hMG alone. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23: 97101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elchalal, U, Schenker, JG. The pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: views and ideas. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1129–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delvigne, A, Rozenberg, S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 559–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieve, LA, Tatham, L, Peterson, HB, Toner, J, Jeng, G. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 959–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Devroey, P, Van Steirteghem, A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, HB, Schieve, LA, Peterson, HB, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 595604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, KM, Boulet, SL, Kissin, DM, Jamieson, DJ; National ART Surveillance (NASS) Group. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 70–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamson, GD, de Mouzon, J, Lancaster, P, et al. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1586–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Mouzon, J, Goossens, V, Bhattacharya, S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1851–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, J, Wang, H, Sheng, X, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 1492–508.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunby, J, Bissonnette, F, Librach, C, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2189–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Peperstraten, AM, Hermens, RP, Nelen, WL, et al. Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2718–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Allen, C, Bowdin, S, Harrison, RF, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 177: 233–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, RA, Gibson, KA, Wu, YW, Croughan, MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 551–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caserta, D, Marci, R, Tatone, C, et al. IVF pregnancies: neonatal outcomes after the new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (law 40/2004). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 935–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchau, SS, Loft, A, Henningsen, AK, Nyboe Andersen, A, Pinborg, A. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: the influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1110–16.e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hvidtjørn, D, Schieve, L, Schendel, D, et al. Cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay in children born after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163: 7283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallen, B. The risk of neurodisability and other long-term outcomes for infants born following ART. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2353–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kashyap, S, Claman, P. Polycystic ovary disease and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 991–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuliev, A, Verlinsky, Y. The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in women of advanced reproductive age. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15: 233–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, S, Shmorgun, D, Claman, P, et al. The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36: 1024–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Ankum, WM, Mol, BW, Van der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1093–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, CA, Ungerer, JA, Beaurepaire, J, Tennant, C, Saunders, D. Anxiety during pregnancy and fetal attachment after in-vitro fertilization conception. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 176–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, DA, Newnham, JP, Bower, C, Hart, R. Implications of polycystic ovary syndrome for pregnancy and for the health of offspring. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1397–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElhaney, RD, Ringer, M, DeHart, DJ, Vasilenko, P. Rubella immunity in a cohort of pregnant women. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 64–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urman, B, Sarac, E, Dogan, L, Gurgan, T. Pregnancy in infertile PCOD patients. Complications and outcome. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 501–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Rackow, BW, Arici, A. Reproductive performance of women with Mullerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syed, I, Hussain, HK, Weadock, W, Ellis, J. Imaging in Mullerian duct abnormalities. Medscape. Updated: Feb 28, 2016. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Golan, A, Langer, R, Neuman, M, et al. Obstetric outcome in women with congenital uterine malformations. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 233–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, PK. Pregnancies in women with uterine malformation, treated obstruction of hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 975–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Roberts, D, Jorgensen, AL. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (4): CD008991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iams, JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, PK. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 311–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiman, G, Harrison, NA, Rubin, A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinborg, A, Ortoft, G, Loft, A, Rasmussen, SC, Ingerslev, HJ. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 197204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehsanipoor, RM, Jolley, JA, Goldshore, MA, et al. The relationship between previous treatment for cervical dysplasia and preterm delivery in twin gestations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 821–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, JR, Seman, EI. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: case history and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58: 551–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, I, Das, M, Fernandez, H, Deffieux, X. Pregnancy after endometrial ablation: a report of three cases. J Reprod Med 2013; 58: 173–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Yin, CS. Pregnancy after hysteroscopic endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation: a report of five cases and a literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 311–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed


McShane, PM, Heye, PS, Epstein, ME. Maternal and perinatal mortality resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 176–82.Google Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Ananth, CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1005–16.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Demissie, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998. A comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 275–81.Google Scholar
Fan, D, Wu, S, Liu, L, et al. Prevalence of antepartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 40320. htps:// Scholar
Crane, JM, Van den Hof, MC, Dodds, L, Armson, BA, Liston, R. Maternal complications with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol. 2000; 17: 101–5.Google Scholar
Crane, JM, Van den Hof, MC, Dods, L, Armson, BA, Liston, R. Neonatal outcomes with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM.The effects of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1299–304.Google Scholar
Faiz, AS, Ananth, CV. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa. An overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 175–90.Google Scholar
Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2353–8.Google Scholar
Naeye, RL. Abruptio placentae and placenta previa: frequency, perinatal mortality, and cigarette smoking. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 701–4.Google Scholar
Hibbard, BM. Bleeding in late pregnancy. In Hibbard, BM (ed.), Principles of Obstetrics. London: Butterworths, 1988, pp. 96104.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, R, Fraser, D, Mazor, M, Leiberman, JR. One or more multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62: 185–8.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta praevia with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1071–8.Google Scholar
Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015–17. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2019.Google Scholar
Cotton, DB, Read, JA, Paul, RH, Quilligan, EJ. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 687–95.Google Scholar
Drife, J, Lewis, G (eds). Why Mothers Die: A Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 2000–2002. London: Stationery Office, 2004.Google Scholar
Naeye, ER. Placenta previa: predisposing factors and effects on the fetus and the surviving infants. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 521–5.Google Scholar
Papinniemi, M, Keski-Nisula, L, Heinonen, S. Placental ratio and risk of velamentous umbilical cord insertion are increased in women with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 353–7.Google Scholar
Varma, TR. Fetal growth and placental function in patients with placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 80: 311–15.Google Scholar
Taipale, P, Hiilesmaa, V, Ylostalo, P. Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonographic screening at 12–16 weeks in a non-selected population. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 364–7.Google Scholar
Konje, JC, Ewings, PD, Adewunmi, OA, et al. The outcome of pregnancies complicated by threatened abortion. J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 12: 150–5.Google Scholar
Newton, ER, Barss, V, Cetrulo, CL. The epidemiology and clinical history of asymptomatic mid-trimester placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 743–8.Google Scholar
Chapman, MG, Furness, ET, Jones, WR, Sheat, JH. Significance of the location of placenta site in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 86: 846–8.Google Scholar
McClure, N, Dornan, JC. Early identification of placenta previa. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 959–61.Google Scholar
Laing, FC. Placenta previa: avoiding false-negative diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 109–13.Google Scholar
Comeau, J, Shaw, L, Marcell, CC, Lavery, JP. Early placenta previa and delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 577–80.Google Scholar
Ruparelia, BA, Chapman, MG. Early low-lying placenta ultrasonic assessment, progress and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1985; 20: 209–13.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, L; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 261–73.Google Scholar
Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Ramus, RM, et al. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 692–7.Google Scholar
Tan, NH, Abu, M, Woo, JLS, Tahir, HM. The role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of placental previa. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 42–5.Google Scholar
Knuppel, AR, Drukker, JE. Bleeding in late pregnancy: antepartum bleeding. In Hayashi, RH, Castillo, MS (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: A Team Approach. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1986, pp. 547–80.Google Scholar
Heer, IM, Muller-Egloff, S, Strauss, A. Placenta previa: comparison of four sonographic modalities. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27: 355–9.Google Scholar
Simon, EG, Fouche, CJ, Perrotin, F. Three-dimensional transvaginal sonography in third-trimester evaluation of placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 465–8.Google Scholar
Bonner, SM, Haynes, SR, Ryall, D. The anesthetic management of cesarean section for placenta previa: a questionnaire survey. Anesthesia 1995; 50: 992–4.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top Guideline No. 27a. London: RCOG, 2018. (accessed February 2020).Google Scholar
Ghourab, S. Third trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 103–8.Google Scholar
Neilson, JP. Interventions for suspected placenta previa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2): CD001998.Google Scholar
Love, CDB, Wallace, EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 864–7.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, C, Jones, DED, Parker, RT. Placenta previa: a survey of 20 years experience with improved perinatal survival by expectant therapy and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1973; 28: 461–70.Google Scholar
Brenner, WE, Edelman, DA, Hendricks, CH. Characteristics of patients with placenta previa and results of “expectant management”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132: 180–91.Google Scholar
Besinger, RE, Moniak, CW, Paskiewicz, LS, Fisher, SG, Tomich, PG. The effect of tocolytic use in the management of symptomatic placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1770–5.Google Scholar
Sharma, A, Suri, V, Gupta, I. Tocolytic therapy in conservative management of symptomatic placenta previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 109–13.Google Scholar
Vintzileos, AM, Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC. Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: S70–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.059.Google Scholar
Silver, RM. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 654–68. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.Google Scholar
Balayla, J, Wo, BL, Bedard, MJ. A late-preterm, early-term stratified analysis of neonatal outcomes by gestational age in placenta previa: defining the optimal timing for delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1756–61.Google Scholar
Hong, J, Jee, Y, Yoon, H, Kim, S. Comparison of general and epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section for placenta previa totalis: maternal hemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12: 1216.Google Scholar
Yamada, T, Mori, H, Ueki, M. Autologous blood transfusion in patients with placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 255–9.Google Scholar
Scott, JS. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Whitefield, CR (ed.), Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Postgraduates, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, pp. 412–17.Google Scholar
Myerscough, PR (ed.). Munro Kerr’s Operative Obstetrics, 10th edn. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1982.Google Scholar
Williamson, HC, Greeley, AV. Management of placenta previa: 12 year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1945; 50: 987–91.Google Scholar
Zaki, ZM, Bahar, AM. Massive haemorrhage due to placenta praevia accreta: a useful role for vasopressin. J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 17: 486–7.Google Scholar
Kato, S, Tanabe, A, Kanki, K, et al. Local injection of vasopressin reduces the blood loss during cesarean section in placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 1249–56.Google Scholar
Miller, DA, Chollet, JA, Goodwin, TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Koonings, PP, Phelan, JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 8992.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.Google Scholar
Knight, M, Nair, M, Tuffnell, D, et al.; MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2017.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Lavery, JA, Vintzileos, AM, et al. Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 272.e1–e9. Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Irgrens, KM, Dalaker, K. The occurrence of placental abruption in Norway 1967–1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 222–8.Google Scholar
Fox, H (ed.). Pathology of the Placenta. London: Saunders, 1978.Google Scholar
Fraser, R, Watson, R. Bleeding during the latter half of pregnancy. In Chalmers, I (ed.), Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. London: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 8992.Google Scholar
Sher, G, Statland, BE. Abruptio placentae with coagulopathy: a rational basis for management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985; 28: 1523.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JA, Brekken, AL. Clinical and laboratory studies on severe abruption placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 97: 681700.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Irgrens, KM, Dalaker, K. The effect on the likelihood of further pregnancy of placental abruption and the rate of its recurrence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1292–5.Google Scholar
Paterson, MEL. The aetiology and outcome of abruptio placentae. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979; 58: 31–5.Google Scholar
Kramer, MS, Usher, RH, Pollack, R, et al. Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 221–6.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 622–8.Google Scholar
Lehtovirta, P, Forss, M. The acute effect of smoking on intervillous blood flow of the placenta. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 729–37.Google Scholar
Scott, JS. Placenta extrachoralis (placenta marginata and placenta circumvallata). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1960; 67: 904–18.Google Scholar
Wilson, D, Paalman, RJ. Clinical significance of circumvallate placenta. Obstet Gynecol 1967; 29: 774–8.Google Scholar
Crosby, WM, Costila, JP. Safety of lap-belt restraint for pregnant victims of automobile collisions. N Engl J Med 1971; 284: 632–5.Google Scholar
Egley, C, Cefalo, R. Abruptio placentae. In Studd, J (ed.), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 5. London, Churchill Livingstone,1985, pp. 108–20.Google Scholar
Yaron, Y, Cherry, M, Kramer, RL, et al. Second trimester maternal serum marker screening: maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, betahuman chorionic gonadotrophin, estriol, and their various combinations as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 968–74.Google Scholar
Abdella, TN, Sibai, BM, Hays, JM, Anderson, GD. Relationship of hypertensive diseases to abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 365–70.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Williams, MA. Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes: a methodologic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 309–18.Google Scholar
Golditch, IA, Boyce, NE. Management of abruptio placentae. JAMA 1970; 212: 288–93.Google Scholar
De Valera, E. Abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 100: 599606.Google Scholar
De Vries, JI, Dekker, GA, Huijgens, PC, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and protein S deficiency in complicated pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1248–54.Google Scholar
Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steinman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 913.Google Scholar
Zdoukopoulos, N, Zintzaras, E. Genetic risk factors for placental abruption: a HuGE review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 309323.Google Scholar
Pariente, G, Wiznitzer, A, Sergienko, R, Mazor, M, Holcberg, G, Sheiner, E. Placental abruption: critical analysis of risk factors and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 24: 698702.Google Scholar
Kennare, R, Heard, A, Chan, A. Substance use during pregnancy: risk factors and obstetric and perinatal outcomes in South Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 220–5.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 332–7.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, M, Luukkaala, T, Gissler, M, et al. Decreasing perinatal mortality in placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 298305.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, VanderWeele, TJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality with preterm delivery as a mediator: disentangling direct and indirect effects. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174: 99108.Google Scholar
Aliyu, MH, Salihu, HM, Lynch, O, et al. Placental abruption, offspring sex, and birth outcomes in a large cohort of mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 248–52.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 140–9.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, Lapinski, RH. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.Google Scholar
Sheiner, E, Shoham-Vardi, I, Hadar, A, et al. Incidence, obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome of preterm placental abruption: a retrospective analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 11: 34–9.Google Scholar
Lunan, CB. The management of abruptio placentae. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 1973; 80: 120–4.Google Scholar
Gibbs, JM, Weindling, AM. Neonatal intracranial lesions following placental abruption. Eur J Pediatr 1994; 153: 195–7.Google Scholar
Niswander, KR, Friedman, EA, Hoover, DB, et al. Fetal morbidity following potentially atoxigenic obstetric conditions: I. Abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 95: 838–45.Google Scholar
Glantz, C, Purnell, L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 837–40.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. Unclassified antepartum haemorrhage: incidence and perinatal mortality in a community. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1970; 77: 492–5.Google Scholar
Hurd, WW, Miodovnik, M, Lavin, JP. Selective management of abruption placentae: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 467–73.Google Scholar
Notelovitz, M, Bottoms, SF, Dase, DF, Leichter, PJ. Painless abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 270–2.Google Scholar
Page, EW, King, EB, Merril, JA. Abruptio placentae: dangers of delayed delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1954; 3: 385–93.Google Scholar
Green-Thompson, RW. Antepartum haemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 9: 479515.Google Scholar
Nyberg, DA, Cyr, DR, Mack, LA, Wilson, DA, Shuman, WP. Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 161–7.Google Scholar
Rivera-Alxima, ME, Saldana, LR, Maklad, N, Korp, S. The use of ultrasound in the expectant management of abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 924–7.Google Scholar
Barron, SL. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Chamberlain, G, Turnbull, A (eds), Obstetrics. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1989, pp. 176–88.Google Scholar
Okonofua, FE, Olatubosun, OA. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery in abruptio placentae associated with live fetuses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1985; 23: 471–4.Google Scholar
Besinger, RE, Niebyl, JR. The safety and efficacy of tocolytics agents for the treatment of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1990; 45: 415–40.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Tocolytic Drugs for Women in Preterm Labour. Green-top Guideline No. 1b. London: RCOG, 2011.Google Scholar
Towers, CV, Pircon, RA, Heppard, M. Is tocolysis safe in the management of third-trimester bleeding? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1572–8.Google Scholar
Colón, I, Berletti, M, Garabedian, MJ, et al. Randomized, double-blinded trial of magnesium sulfate tocolysis versus intravenous normal saline for preterm nonsevere placental abruption. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33: 696702. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571324.Google Scholar
Ruiter, L, Ravelli, AC, de Graaf, IM, Mol, BW, Pajkrt, E. Incidence and recurrence rate of placental abruption: a longitudinal linked national cohort study in the Netherlands. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 573.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.019.Google Scholar
Roberge, S, Bujold, E, Nicolaides, KH. Meta-analysis on the effect of aspirin use for prevention of preeclampsia on placental abruption and antepartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 483–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.238.Google Scholar
Kim, YA. Makar, RS. Detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 417–23.Google Scholar
Oyelese, KO, Turner, M, Lees, C, Campbell, S. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 18: 109–15.Google Scholar
Baulies, S, Maiz, N, Muñoz, A, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of vasa previa and analysis of risk factors. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 595–9.Google Scholar
Englert, Y, Imbert, MC, Van Rosendael, E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 155–7.Google Scholar
Jauniaux, E, Englert, Y, Vanesse, M, et al. Pathologic features of placentas from singleton pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 61–4.Google Scholar
Lee, W, Lee, VL, Kirk, JS, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis, natural evolution, and clinical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 572–6.Google Scholar
Rebarber, A, Dolin, C, Fox, NS, et al. Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 141–7.Google Scholar
Bronsteen, R, Whitten, A, Balasubramanian, M, et al. Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 352–7.Google Scholar
Antoine, C, Young, BK, Silverman, F, Greco, MA, Alvarez, SP. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295300.Google Scholar
Dougall, A, Baird, CH. Vasa previa: report of three cases and review of literature. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 712–15.Google Scholar
Derbala, Y, Grochal, F, Jeanty, P. Vasa previa. J Prenat Med 2007; 1: 213.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia, Placenta Praevia Accreta and Vasa Praevia: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top Guideline No. 27. London: RCOG, 2011. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Gagnon, R, Morin, L, Bly, S, et al. Guidelines for the management of vasa previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 748–60.Google Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937–42.Google Scholar
Paavonen, J, Jouttunpää, K, Kangasluoma, P, et al. Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord and vasa previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1984; 22: 207–11.Google Scholar
Watson, R. Antepartum haemorrhage of uncertain origin. Br J Clin Pract 1982; 36: 222–6.Google Scholar
Macafee, CHG, Harley, JMG. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Claye, A (ed.), British Obstetric Practice: Obstetrics, 3rd edn. London: Heinemann, 1963, pp 195204.Google Scholar
Willocks, J. Antepartum haemorrhage of uncertain origin. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 78: 987–91.Google Scholar
Naftolin, F, Khudr, G, Benirschke, K, Hutchinson, DL. The syndrome of chronic abruptio placentae, hydorrhoea and circumvallate placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 116: 347–50.Google Scholar
Walker, J, MacGillivary, I, MacNaughton, MC (eds). Combined Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 9th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1976, pp. 133–45.Google Scholar


Boyle, B, McConkey, R, Garne, E, et al. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984–2007. BJOG 2013; 120: 707–16.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2016. Statistical Bulletin October 2017. (accessed September 2018).Google Scholar
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK, Drake, P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67(1): 155. (accessed September 2018).Google Scholar
Vayssiere, C, Benoist, G, Blondel, B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156: 1217.Google Scholar
Hall, JG. Twinning. Lancet 2003; 362: 735–43.Google Scholar
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57: 1102Google Scholar
Chauhan, SP, Scardo, JA, Hayes, E, Abuhamad, AZ, Berghella, V. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 305–15.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A, Blondel, B. Demographic trends in Western European countries. In Blickstein, I, Keith, LG (eds), Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Gestation, and Perinatal Outcome, 2nd edn. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005, pp. 1121.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Multiple births and single embryo transfer review, 2013. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Weber, MA, Sebire, NJ. Genetics and developmental pathology of twinning. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 313–18.Google Scholar
Benirschke, K, Kim, CK. Multiple pregnancy. 2. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 1329–36.Google Scholar
Derom, C, Vlietinck, R, Derom, R, Van den Berghe, H, Thiery, M. Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet 1987; 1: 1236–8.Google Scholar
Umranikar, A, Parmar, D, Davies, S, Fountain, S. Multiple births following in vitro fertilization treatment: redefining success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 299304.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility Problems: Assessment and Treatment. Clinical Guideline CG156. London: NICE, 2013. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Multiple Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproduction. Scientific Impact Paper No. 22. London: RCOG, 2011. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Luke, B, Brown, MB, Wantman, E, Stern, JE. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 683–9.Google Scholar
Busnelli, A, Dallagiovanna, C, Reschini, M, et al. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 302–17. Scholar
Glujovsky, D, Blake, D, Farquhar, C, Bardach, A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (7): CD002118.Google Scholar
McLernon, D, Harrild, K, Bergh, C, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 341: c6945.Google Scholar
Gelbaya, TA, Tsoumpou, I, Nardo, LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 936–45.Google Scholar
Luke, B, Gopal, D, Cabral, H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 330.e115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025.Google Scholar
Helmerhorst, FM, Perquin, DA, Donker, D, Keirse, MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 261.Google Scholar
Santana, DS, Cecatti, JG, Surita, FG, et al. Twin pregnancy and severe maternal outcomes: the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127: 631–41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001338.Google Scholar
Rao, A, Sairam, S, Shehata, H. Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18: 557–76.Google Scholar
Sibai, BM, Hauth, J, Caritis, S, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 938–42.Google Scholar
Laine, K, Murzakanova, G, Sole, KB, et al. Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (7): e029908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029908.Google Scholar
Schwartz, DB, Daoud, Y, Zazula, P, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 912–14.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 7584.Google Scholar
Blondel, B, Macfarlane, A, Gissler, M, Breart, G, Zeitlin, J. General obstetrics: preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG 2006; 113: 528–35.Google Scholar
Victoria, A, Mora, G, Arias, F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 310–15.Google Scholar
Ross, LE, McQueen, K, Vigod, S, Dennis, CL. Risk for postpartum depression associated with assisted reproductive technologies and multiple births: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 96106.Google Scholar
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safe: 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.Google Scholar
Sebire, N Anomalous development in twins (including monozygotic duplication). In Kilby, M, Baker, P, Critchley, H, Field, D (eds), Multiple Pregnancy. London: RCOG Press; 2006, pp. 5988.Google Scholar
Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Wright, C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1306–11.Google Scholar
Morin, L, Lim, K, Bly, S, et al. Ultrasound in twin pregnancies: no. 260, June 2011. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011; 115: 117–18.Google Scholar
Berghella, V, Saccone, G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9: CD007235. Scholar
Sun, LM, Chen, XK, Wen, SW, et al. Perinatal outcomes of normal cotwins in twin pregnancies with one structurally anomalous fetus: a population-based retrospective study. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 51–6.Google Scholar
Pandya, PP, Snijders, RJ, Psara, N, Hilbert, L, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence of non-viable pregnancy at 10–13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 170–3.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Snijders, RJ, Hughes, K, Sepulveda, W, Nicolaides, KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1203–7.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Early fetal loss in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 632–6.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Thornton, S, Hughes, K, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence and consequences of missed abortion in twin pregnancies at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 847–8.Google Scholar
Landy, H, Keith, L. The vanishing twin: a review. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 177–83.Google Scholar
Kamath, MS, Antonisamy, B, Selliah, HY, Sunkara, SK. Perinatal outcomes of singleton live births with and without vanishing twin following transfer of multiple embryos: analysis of 113 784 singleton live births. Hum Reprod 2018; 33: 2018–22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey284.Google Scholar
Ong, S, Zamora, J, Khan, K, Kilby, M. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG 2006; 113: 992–8.Google Scholar
Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 928–40.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Thilaganathan, B, Dias, T, et al. Influence of chorionicity and gestational age at single fetal loss on risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 723–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.17426.Google Scholar
Breathnach, FM, Malone, FD. Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36: 175–81.Google Scholar
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 94103.Google Scholar
Lewi, L, Deprest, J. Management of twin pregnancies: where do we go from here? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 601–4.Google Scholar
Kalafat, E, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Khalil, A. Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 378–84. doi: 10.1002/uog.18914.Google Scholar
Couck, I, Mourad Tawfic, N, Deprest, J, et al. Does site of cord insertion increase risk of adverse outcome, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and discordant growth in monochorionic twin pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 385–9. doi: 10.1002/uog.18926.Google Scholar
Jones, R, Roberton, N. Small for dates babies: are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child 1986; 61: 877–80.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e131–46.Google Scholar
Miller, J, Chauhan, SP, Abuhamad, AZ. Discordant twins: diagnosis, evaluation and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 1020.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Joseph, K, Demissie, K, Vintzileos, AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1076.e1–9.Google Scholar
Kiely, JL. What is the population-based risk of preterm birth among twins and other multiples? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 41: 311.Google Scholar
Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Bell, EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 443–56.Google Scholar
Murphy, D, MacKenzie, I. The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 826–30.Google Scholar
Cohen, M, Kohl, S, Rosenthal, A. Fetal interlocking complicating twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 91: 407–12.Google Scholar
Pharoah, P. Neurological outcome in twins. Semin Neonatol 2002; 7: 223–30.Google Scholar
MBRRACE-UK. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report: UK perinatal deaths for births from January to December 2014. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 2016. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Kurinczuk, JJ, et al., on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK Collaboration. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2016. Leicester: Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2018.Google Scholar
Danon, D, Sekar, R, Hack, KE, Fisk, NM. Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1318–26.Google Scholar
Dube, J, Dodds, L, Armson, BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 579–83.Google Scholar
Barigye, O, Pasquini, L, Galea, P, et al. High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study. PLoS Med 2005; 2 (6): e172.Google Scholar
Spitz, L. Conjoined twins. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 814–19.Google Scholar
Mutchinick, OM, Luna-Muñoz, L, Amar, E, et al. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2011; 157C: 274–87.Google Scholar
Chen, CP, Hsu, CY, Su, JW, et al. Conjoined twins detected in the first trimester: a review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 50: 424–31.Google Scholar
Dias, T, Mahsud-Dornan, S, Bhide, A, Papageorghiou, AT, Thilaganathan, B. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 201–4.Google Scholar
Baxi, LV, Walsh, CA. Monoamniotic twins in contemporary practice: a single-center study of perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 506–10.Google Scholar
Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Schaap, AH, et al. Perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 353–60.Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, Prefumo, F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 131–5.Google Scholar
Sueters, M, Oepkes, D. Diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction, twin anaemia-polycythaemia sequence, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 215–26.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Beune, I, Hecher, K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 4754. doi: 10.1002/uog.19013.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy, 2nd edn. Green-top Guideline No. 51. London: RCOG, 2016. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Gratacos, E, Antolin, E, Lewi, L, et al. Monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (Type III): feasibility and perinatal outcome of fetoscopic placental laser coagulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 669–75.Google Scholar
Gratacos, E, Lewi, L, Muñoz, B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 2834.Google Scholar
Healey, MG. Acardia: predictive risk factors for the co-twin’s survival. Teratology 1994; 50: 205–13.Google Scholar
Lewi, L, Valencia, C, Gonzalez, E, Deprest, J, Nicolaides, KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 213.e1–4.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrauterine laser ablation of placental vessels for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance IPG198. London: NICE, 2006. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Denbow, M, Fogliani, R, Kyle, P, et al. Haematological indices at fetal blood sampling in monochorionic pregnancies complicated by feto-fetal transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 941–6.Google Scholar
Stagnati, V, Zanardini, C, Fichera, A, et al. Early prediction of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016. doi: 10.1002/uog.15989. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
Mackie, FL, Whittle, R, Morris, RK, et al. First-trimester ultrasound measurements and maternal serum biomarkers as prognostic factors in monochorionic twins: a cohort study. Diagn Progn Res 2019; 3: 9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0054-9.Google Scholar
Simpson, LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 318.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 550–5.Google Scholar
Lopriore, E, Oepkes, D, Walther, FJ. Neonatal morbidity in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Early Hum Dev 2011; 87: 595–9.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, LSA, Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Improved prediction of twin anemia–polycythemia sequence by delta middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: new antenatal classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 788–93. doi: 10.1002/uog.20096.Google Scholar
Tavares de Sousa, M, Fonseca, A, Hecher, K. Role of fetal intertwin difference in middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in predicting neonatal twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 794–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.20116.Google Scholar
Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 181–90.Google Scholar
Ellings, JM, Newman, RB, Hulsey, TC, Bivins, HA, Keenan, A. Reduction in very low birth weight deliveries and perinatal mortality in a specialized, multidisciplinary twin clinic. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 387–91.Google Scholar
Newman, RB, Ellings, JM. Antepartum management of the multiple gestation: the case for specialized care. Semin Perinatol 1995; 19: 387403.Google Scholar
Ruk, RJ, Brown, CE, Peters, MT, Johnston, AB. Specialized care for twin gestations: improving newborn outcomes und reducing costs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001; 30: 5260.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Multiple pregnancy: twin and triplet pregnancies. NICE Quality Standard QS 46. London: NICE, 2013 (updated September 2019). (accessed February 2020).Google Scholar
Twins and Multiple Births Association. NICE Works: Twins and Multiple Births Association Maternity Engagement Project Final Report. Aldershot: TAMBA, 2019. (accessed February 2020).Google Scholar
Ballard, CK, Bricker, L, Reed, K, Wood, L, Neilson, JP. Nutritional advice for improving outcomes in multiple pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (6): CD008867.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Twin and Triplet Pregnancy. NICE Guideline NG137. London: NICE, 2019. (accessed December 2020).Google Scholar
Lewi, L, Lewi, P, Diemert, A, et al. The role of ultrasound examination in the first trimester and at 16 weeks’ gestation to predict fetal complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 493.e1–7.Google Scholar
Kurtz, A, Wapner, R, Mata, J, Johnson, A, Morgan, P. Twin pregnancies: accuracy of first-trimester abdominal US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity. Radiology 1992; 185: 759–62.Google Scholar
Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Sharma, S. Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 824–9.Google Scholar
Lu, J, Cheng, YKY, Ting, YH, Law, KM, Leung, TY. Pitfalls in assessing chorioamnionicity: novel observations and literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 242–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.010.Google Scholar
Dias, T, Ladd, S, Mahsud-Dornan, S, et al. Systematic labeling of twin pregnancies on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 130–3.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal Care for Uncomplicated Pregnancies. NICE Clinical Guideline CG62. London: NICE, 2008. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Spencer, K Screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in the first trimester using free β-hCG and PAPP-A, combined with fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 91–5.Google Scholar
NHS Screening Programmes. Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme: Programme Handbook. June 2015. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Gil, MM, Quezada, MS, Revello, R, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 249–66.Google Scholar
Canick, JA, Kloza, EM, Lambert-Messerlian, GM, et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to identify Down syndrome and other trisomies in multiple gestations. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 730–4.Google Scholar
Attilakos, G, Maddocks, DG, Davies, T, et al. Quantification of free fetal DNA in multiple pregnancies and relationship with chorionicity. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 967–72.Google Scholar
Leung, TY, Qu, JZ, Liao, GJ, et al. Noninvasive twin zygosity assessment and aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 675–81.Google Scholar
Qu, JZ, Leung, TY, Jiang, P, et al. Noninvasive prenatal determination of twin zygosity by maternal plasma DNA analysis. Clin Chem 2013; 59: 427–35.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal Abnormality using Maternal Plasma DNA. Scientific Impact Paper No. 15. London: RCOG, 2014. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists. Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: e31–7.Google Scholar
Benn, P, Borrell, A, Chiu, RW, et al. Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 725–34.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Green-top Guideline No. 8. London: RCOG, 2010. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Yukobowich, E, Anteby, EY, Cohen, SM, et al. Risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancies undergoing second trimester amniocentesis(1). Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 231–4.Google Scholar
Millaire, M, Bujold, E, Morency, AM, Gauthier, RJ. Mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancy and the risk of fetal loss. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28: 512–18.Google Scholar
Weisz, B, Rodeck, CH. Invasive diagnostic procedures in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 751–8.Google Scholar
Antsaklis, A, Daskalakis, G, Souka, AP, Kavalakis, Y, Michalas, S. Fetal blood sampling in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 377–9.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Odibo, AO, Prefumo, F, et al. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 1123. doi: 10.1002/uog.18966.Google Scholar
Leombroni, M, Liberati, M, Fanfani, F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in predicting birth-weight discordance in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 442–50. doi: 10.1002/uog.17348.Google Scholar
Townsend, R, Duffy, JM, Sileo, F, et al.; International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Selective Fetal Growth Restriction (CHOOSE-FGR). A core outcome set for studies investigating the management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; doi: 10.1002/uog.20388.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Duffy, JMN, Perry, H, et al.; International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Selective Fetal Growth Restriction (CHOOSE-FGR). Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Trials 2019; 20 (1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3153-y.Google Scholar
Ishii, K, Murakoshi, T, Takahashi, Y, Shinno, T, Matsushita, M, Naruse, H, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 26: 157–61.Google Scholar
Townsend, R, D’Antonio, F, Sileo, FG, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 3646. doi: 10.1002/uog.20114.Google Scholar
Monaghan, C, Kalafat, E, Binder, J, Thilaganathan, B, Khalil, A. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 200–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.19078.Google Scholar
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Curtin, SC, Mathews, TJ. National vital statistics reports. Births: final data for 2013–2015.Google Scholar
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al.; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 50–9. Scholar
Conde-Agudelo A, Romero, R, Hassan, SS, Yeo, L. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 128.e112. Scholar
Lee, YM. Delivery of twins. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36: 195200.Google Scholar
Singer, E, Pilpel, S, Bsat, F, Plevyak, M, Healy, A, Markenson, G. Accuracy of fetal fibronectin to predict preterm birth in twin gestations with symptoms of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1083–7.Google Scholar
Gyamfi, C, Lerner, V, Holzman, I, Stone, JL. Routine cervical length in twins and perinatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 65–9.Google Scholar
da Silva Lopes, K, Takemoto, Y, Ota, E, Tanigaki, S, Mori, R. Bed rest with and without hospitalisation in multiple pregnancy for improving perinatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (3): CD012031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012031.pub2.Google Scholar
Sosa, C, Althabe, F, Belizan, J, Bergel, E. Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003581.Google Scholar
Norman, JE, Mackenzie, F, Owen, P, et al. Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy (STOPPIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373: 2034–40.Google Scholar
Dodd, JM, Grivell, RM, O’Brien, CM, Dowswell, T, Deussen, AR. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (11). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3.Google Scholar
Schuit, E, Stock, S, Rode, L, et al. Effectiveness of progestogens to improve perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BJOG 2015; 122: 2737.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Conde-Agudelo, A, El-Refaie, W, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta‐analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 303–14. doi: 10.1002/uog.17397.Google Scholar
Rafael, TJ, Berghella, V, Alfirevic, Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (9): CD009166.Google Scholar
Liem, SM, van Pampus, MG, Mol, BW, Bekedam, DJ. Cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013; 2013: 576723.Google Scholar
Liem, S, Schuit, E, Hegeman, M, et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1341–9.Google Scholar
Goya, M, Pratcorona, L, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary in 112 pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1800–6.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, et al. Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214(1): 3.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.051.Google Scholar
Pratcorona, L, Goya, M, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary to reduce preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation after an episode of preterm labor and a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 99.e116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.031.Google Scholar
Thangatorai, R, Lim, FC, Nalliah, S. Cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm births in multiple pregnancies with a short cervix: PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 1638–45. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1319930.Google Scholar
Norman, JE, Norrie, J, Maclennan, G, et al. Open randomised trial of the (Arabin) pessary to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancy with health economics and acceptability: STOPPIT-2 – a study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8 (12): e026430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026430.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, LN, Hornung, RW, Lindsell, CJ, Brewer, DE, Donovan, EF. Effects of antenatal glucocorticoids on outcomes of very low birth weight multifetal gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 804–10.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Preterm Prelabour Rupture of the Membranes. Green-top Guideline No. 44. London: RCOG, 2010. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, Jones, D, et al.; MRC ORACLE Children Study. Long term outcomes following prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with either spontaneous preterm labour or preterm rupture of the membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 14.Google Scholar
Sela, HY, Simpson, LL. Preterm premature rupture of membranes complicating twin pregnancy: management considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54: 321–9.Google Scholar
Doyle, LW, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Marret, S, Rouse, D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1): CD004661.Google Scholar
Wu, MY, Chen, SU, Lee, CN, Ho, HN, Yang, YS. Use of atosiban in a twin pregnancy with extremely preterm premature rupture in the membrane of one twin: a case report and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 495–9.Google Scholar
Cheung, KW, Seto, MTY, Wang, W, et al. Effect of delayed interval delivery of remaining fetus(es) in multiple pregnancies on survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222: 306319.e18. Scholar
Dodd, J, Crowther, C. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies to twins. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1420–2.Google Scholar
Wimalasundera, RC. Selective reduction and termination of multiple pregnancies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 327–35.Google Scholar
Devine, PC, Malone, FD, Athanassiou, A, Harvey-Wilkes, K, D’Alton, ME. Maternal and neonatal outcome of 100 consecutive triplet pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18: 225–35.Google Scholar
Petterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ 1993; 307: 1239–43.Google Scholar
Curado, J, D'antonio, F, Papageorghiou, AT, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in triplet pregnancy according to chorionicity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54: 589–95. Scholar
Antsaklis, A, Anastasakis, E. Selective reduction in twins and multiple pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2011; 39: 1521.Google Scholar
Zipori, Y, Haas, J, Berger, H, Barzilay, E. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplets to twins compared with non-reduced triplets: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35: 296304. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.05.012.Google Scholar
Anthoulakis, C, Dagklis, T, Mamopoulos, A, Athanasiadis, A. Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 1351–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex084.Google Scholar
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA. Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (10): CD003932.Google Scholar
Evans, MI, Goldberg, JD, Horenstein, J, et al. Selective termination for structural, chromosomal, and Mendelian anomalies: international experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 893–7.Google Scholar
Evans, MI, Goldberg, JD, Dommergues, M, et al. Efficacy of second-trimester selective termination for fetal abnormalities: international collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 90–4.Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: a systematic review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 123–9.Google Scholar
Schreiner-Engel, P, Walther, VN, Mindes, J, Lynch, L, Berkowitz, RL. First-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction: acute and persistent psychologic reactions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 541–7.Google Scholar
Heyborne, KD, Porreco, RP, Garite, TJ, Phair, K, Abril, D. Improved perinatal survival of monoamniotic twins with intensive inpatient monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 96101.Google Scholar
Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi, L, et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 498506. Scholar
MONOMONO Working Group. Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: the MONOMONO study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 175–83. Scholar
Hillman, S, Morris, R, Kilby, M. Single twin demise: consequence for survivors. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 2010; 15: 319–26.Google Scholar
Mackie, FL, Rigby, A, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2019; 126: 569–78. Scholar
Righini, A, Salmona, S, Bianchini, E, et al. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ischemic brain lesions in the survivors of monochorionic twin pregnancies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 8792.Google Scholar
Senat, MV, Bernard, JP, Loizeau, S, Ville, Y. Management of single fetal death in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a role for fetal blood sampling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 360–3.Google Scholar
Tanawattanacharoen, S, Taylor, MJ, Letsky, EA, et al. Intrauterine rescue transfusion in monochorionic multiple pregnancies with recent single intrauterine death. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 274–8.Google Scholar
Brassard, M, Fouron, JC, Leduc, L, Grignon, A, Proulx, F. Prognostic markers in twin pregnancies with an acardiac fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 409–14.Google Scholar
Malone, FD, D’Alton, ME. Anomalies peculiar to multiple gestations. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27: 1033–46, x.Google Scholar
Mone, F, Devaseelan, P, Ong, S. Intervention versus a conservative approach in the management of TRAP sequence: a systematic review. J Perinat Med 2016; 44: 619–29.Google Scholar
Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, Sotiriadis, A, Kosinski, P, Nicolaides, KH. Optimal method and timing of intrauterine intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: case study and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 35: 267–79.Google Scholar
Cabassa, P, Fichera, A, Prefumo, F, et al. The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 166: 127–32.Google Scholar
Lopriore, E, Sueters, M, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Neonatal outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser occlusion of vascular anastomoses. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 597602.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Cooper, E, Townsend, R, Thilaganathan, B. Evolution of stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS): systematic review and meta-analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet 2016; 19: 207–16. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.33.Google Scholar
Roberts, D, Neilson, JP, Kilby, MD, Gates, S. Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (1): CD002073.Google Scholar
Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 136–44.Google Scholar
Crombleholme, TM, Shera, D, Lee, H, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 396.e1–9.Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. The efficacy of Quintero staging system to assess severity of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 537–44.Google Scholar
Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, Oepkes, D, et al. Residual anastomoses after fetoscopic laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: frequency, associated risks and outcome. Placenta 2007; 28: 204–8.Google Scholar
Robyr, R, Lewi, L, Salomon, LJ, et al. Prevalence and management of late fetal complications following successful selective laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 796803.Google Scholar
Dhillon, RK, Hillman, SC, Pounds, R, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Comparison of Solomon technique against selective laser ablation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 526–31.Google Scholar
van Klink, JM, Koopman, HM, van Zwet, EW, et al. Improvement in neurodevelopmental outcome in survivors of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 540.e1–7.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Selman, TJ, Harbidge, A, Martin, WI, Kilby, MD. Fetoscopic laser coagulation for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: factors influencing perinatal outcome, learning curve of the procedure and lessons for new centres. BJOG 2010; 117: 1350–7.Google Scholar
Beck, V, Lewi, P, Gucciardo, L, Devlieger, R. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and fetal survival after minimally invasive fetal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 19.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M, El Murr, L, Robyr, R, et al. Incidence and impact of perioperative complications in 175 fetoscopy-guided laser coagulations of chorionic plate anastomoses in fetofetal transfusion syndrome before 26 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1110–16.Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Comparison of donor and recipient outcomes following laser therapy performed for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a meta-analysis and review of literature. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 2732.Google Scholar
Herberg, U, Gross, W, Bartmann, P, et al. Long term cardiac follow up of severe twin to twin transfusion syndrome after intrauterine laser coagulation. Heart 2006; 92: 95100.Google Scholar
Lopriore, E, Slaghekke, F, Oepkes, D, et al. Hematological characteristics in neonates with twin anemia–polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 251–5.Google Scholar
Leung, TY, Tam, WH, Leung, TN, Lok, IH, Lau, TK. Effect of twin-to-twin delivery interval on umbilical cord blood gas in the second twins. BJOG 2002; 109: 63–7.Google Scholar
Dodd, JM, Deussen, AR, Grivell, RM, Crowther, CA. Elective birth at 37 weeks’ gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (2): CD003582.Google Scholar
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Haslam, RR, Robinson, JS. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial. BJOG 2012; 119: 964–73.Google Scholar
Morales, WJ, O’BRIEN, WF, Knuppel, RA, Gaylord, S, Hayes, P. The effect of mode of delivery on the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in nondiscordant twin gestations under 1500 g. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 107–10.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ, Barrett, JF, Crowther, CA. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (12): CD006553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006553.pub3.Google Scholar
Hogle, KL, Hutton, EK, McBrien, KA, Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 220–7.Google Scholar
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ, Hannah, M, Lawrie, TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (7): CD000166.Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, Mullin, PM, Chmait, RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2011; 118: 523–32.Google Scholar
Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al.; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1295–305.Google Scholar
Wildschut, H, van Roosmalen, J, van Leeuwen, E, Keirse, MJ. Planned abdominal compared with planned vaginal birth in triplet pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 292–6.Google Scholar
Stutchfield, P, Whitaker, R, Russell, I. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ 2005; 331: 662.Google Scholar
Fox, NS, Silverstein, M, Bender, S, et al. Active second-stage management in twin pregnancies undergoing planned vaginal delivery in a US population. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 229–33.Google Scholar
Myles, T. Vaginal birth of twins after a previous Cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10: 171–4.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B; Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Does antenatal ultrasound labeling predict birth order in twin pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 274–7.Google Scholar
Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 840–7.Google Scholar
Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex-vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 310.Google Scholar
Rydhstrom, H. Prognosis for twins with birth weight less than 1500 gm: the impact of cesarean section in relation to fetal presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 528–33.Google Scholar
Acker, D, Lieberman, M, Holbrook, RH, et al. Delivery of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 710–11.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC. Intrapartum external version of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 160–5.Google Scholar
Chauhan, SP, Roberts, WE, McLaren, RA, et al. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: breech extraction versus external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1015–20.Google Scholar
Webster, SN, Loughney, AD. Internal podalic version with breech extraction. Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2011; 13: 714.Google Scholar
Rayburn, WF, Lavin, JP, Miodovnik, M, Varner, MW. Multiple gestation: time interval between delivery of the first and second twins. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 502–6.Google Scholar
Thompson, SA, Lyons, TL, Makowski, EL. Outcomes of twin gestations at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 1973–1983. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 328–39.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Youcha, S, Hobbins, JC, Berkowitz, RL. Intrapartum management of twin gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 119–24.Google Scholar
Rydhstrom, H, Ingemarsson, I. Interval between birth of the first and the second twin and its impact on second twin perinatal mortality. J Perinat Med 1990; 18: 449–53.Google Scholar
Robertson, E, Celasun, N, Stewart, DE. Risk factors for postpartum depression. In Stewart, DE, Robertson, E, Dennis, CL, Grace, SL, Wallington, T (eds), Postpartum Depression: Literature Review of Risk Factors and Interventions. Toronto: Toronto Public Health, 2003. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Simmons, R, Doyle, P, Maconochie, N. Dramatic reduction in triplet and higher order births in England and Wales. BJOG 2004; 111: 856–8.Google Scholar
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1856–64.Google Scholar
Wen, SW, Demissie, K, Yang, Q, Walker, MC. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 254–8.Google Scholar
Pandian, Z, Marjoribanks, J, Ozturk, O, Serour, G, Bhattacharya, S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (7): CD003416.Google Scholar
Sepulveda, W, Sebire, NJ, Hughes, K, Odibo, A, Nicolaides, KH. The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 421–3.Google Scholar
Campbell, DM, Templeton, A. Maternal complications of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2004; 84: 71–3.Google Scholar
Cotter, A, Ness, A, Tolosa, J. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (4): CD001808.Google Scholar


World Health Organization. WHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modificat