Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-h9sqt Total loading time: 1.732 Render date: 2022-01-17T02:17:40.151Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

6 - Thomas Edwards's Gangraena and heresiological traditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2010

Ann Hughes
Affiliation:
Professor of Early Modern History, University of Keele
David Loewenstein
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
John Marshall
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

In 1649, the London Puritan artisan Nehemiah Wallington noted, “A black cover book I did begin to write against the errors of these times, but because there were so many that hath done it far better than I can, I did give it over.” Amongst Wallington's many contemporaries, his fellow Londoner Thomas Edwards was the most prolific writer, and Edwards's Gangraena, published in three parts in February, May, and December 1646, the most notorious of the orthodox Puritan attempts to describe and denounce error, heresy, and schism, as parliamentarians struggled amongst themselves for control of godly reformation. Denounced by an anonymous critic as “the famous forger of these latter dayes,” and by John Milton as “Shallow Edwards,” one of the “New Forcers of Conscience under the Long Parliament,” Edwards has been controversial also amongst modern scholars. Whilst Gangraena has been copiously used as a source in the works of Christopher Hill and other historians of radical religion, Colin Davis, in particular, has denied that Edwards offers valid “depictions of the social and political realities” of his day; rather he is “a source of good evidence for the study of the mid-seventeenth-century heresiographer, of which he is virtually an archetype.”

This chapter takes up Davis's challenge to analyze Gangraena as heresiology or heresiography – a neologism derived from Ephraim Pagitt's 1645 book of that title. It discusses what it means to describe Edwards as a “heresiographer” and explores the influence of his avowed models, ancient and recent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
2
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×