Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Further reading
- Translator's note
- On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany
- Other writings
- From a letter to Moses Moser in Berlin, May 23, 1823
- From The Songbook (1827), “Return home”
- From The Songbook (1827), “North sea: second cycle”
- From Lucca, the City (in Travel Pictures, Part IV, 1831)
- From the Introduction to “Kahldorf on the Nobility in Letters to Count M. von Moltke” (1831)
- From The Romantic School (1835)
- From New Poems (1844), “Poems of the Times,” “Doctrine”
- From the Letters about Germany (1844)
- From the “Afterword” to Romanzero (1851)
- From Confessions (1854)
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy
From the Letters about Germany (1844)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Further reading
- Translator's note
- On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany
- Other writings
- From a letter to Moses Moser in Berlin, May 23, 1823
- From The Songbook (1827), “Return home”
- From The Songbook (1827), “North sea: second cycle”
- From Lucca, the City (in Travel Pictures, Part IV, 1831)
- From the Introduction to “Kahldorf on the Nobility in Letters to Count M. von Moltke” (1831)
- From The Romantic School (1835)
- From New Poems (1844), “Poems of the Times,” “Doctrine”
- From the Letters about Germany (1844)
- From the “Afterword” to Romanzero (1851)
- From Confessions (1854)
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy
Summary
We now have monks of atheism who would burn Mr. de Voltaire alive because he is a stubborn deist. I have to admit that I do not like this music, but it also does not frighten me, since I was standing behind the maestro when he composed it, in very confused and ornate symbols, to be sure, so that not everyone could decipher it – I saw how on occasion he would look around anxiously, worried that he would be understood. He was quite fond of me, since he was certain that I would not betray him; at the time, I even considered him servile. Once, when I was displeased by the phrase: “Whatever is, is rational,” he smiled in a strange way and remarked, “It could also be put: whatever is, must be.” He hastily looked around, but soon grew calm since only Heinrich Beer had heard him. I myself did not understand such figures of speech until later. Thus, it was only later that I understood why he had maintained in his philosophy of history that Christianity represented progress because it taught of a God who is dead, whereas the pagan divinities knew nothing of any death. What sort of progress it would be if God had never existed at all! We stood one evening at the window, and I poetized about the stars, the habitations of the blessed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007