Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-pkshj Total loading time: 0.573 Render date: 2021-12-05T19:03:33.860Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Rachel Zuckert
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
James Kreines
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics, trans. Ashton, E. B.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1984a. Aesthetic Theory, trans. Lenhardt, C.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1984b. “The Idea of Natural History,” Telos 60: 111–24.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1993. Hegel: Three Studies, trans. Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1998. “Progress,” in Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords, trans. Pickford, Henry W.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 2006. History and Freedom, trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Allison, H. E. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2000. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2006. Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2010.“Reinhold, History, and the Foundation of Philosophy,” in Karl Leonhard Reinhold and the Enlightenment, ed. di Giovanni, G.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2012. Kant’s Elliptical Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2014.“ History, Succession, and German Romanticism,” in Nassar, (ed.), pp. 4767.
Anderson, E. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy,” Episteme 3: 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aner, K. 1909. Gottfried Ploucquets Leben und Lehren. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2000. Intention. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 1963. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione, trans. with notes and glossary by Ackrill, J. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1993. Posterior Analytics, trans. with a commentary by Barnes, Jonathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan 2011. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Carl 1932. The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Behler, Ernst 1993. German Romantic Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (trans. and ed.) 1996. The Early Political Writings of the German Romantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 118–72.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. 2001. Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bienenstock, Myriam (ed.) 2014. Devoir de mémoire? Les lois mémorielles et l’Histoire. Paris: Éditions de l’éclat.Google Scholar
Bobzien, Susanne 2003. “Logic,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. 1894. “The Reality of the General Will,” International Journal of Ethics 4: 308–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourriaud, Nicolas 2009. “Introduction,” in Manet and the Object of Painting, by Foucault, Michel, trans. Barr, Matthew. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
Bowman, Brady 2014. Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. 1927. Ethical Studies. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1979. “Freedom and Constraint by Norms,” American Philosophical Quarterly 16.3: 187–96.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2005. “Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel: Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts,” International Yearbook of German Idealism 3: 131–61.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2009. Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, D. 2010. “Gemeinschaft als Ergänzung,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58: 195219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1993. “Concepts, Definitions and Meaning,” Metaphilosophy 24: 309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Comay, Rebecca 2014. “Defaced Statues: Idealism and Iconoclasm in Hegel’s Aesthetics,” October 149: 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, B. 1969. “Freedom as Politics,” in Philosophy, Politics and Society: Third Series, ed. Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Vol. III, pp. 194214.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2003. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1969. “The Ethics of Democracy,” in John Dewey, The Early Works: 1882–1898, ed. Boydston, J. A. and Axetell, G. E., Vol. I, pp. 227–49. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1984a. “From Absolutism to Experimentalism,” in John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, ed. J. Boydston, A., Vol. V, pp. 147–61. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press 61.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1984b. “The Public and Its Problems,” in John Dewey, The Later Works 1925–1953, ed. J. Boydston, A., Vol. II, pp. 235372. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dudley, W. 2008. “Ethical Life, Morality and the Role of Spirit in the Phenomenology of Spirit,” in Hegel’s “Phenomenology of Spirit”: A Critical Guide, ed. Moyar, Dean and Quante, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–49.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus 1976. Das Problem der Subjektivität in Hegels Logik. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Eley, L. (ed.) 1990. Hegels theorie des subjektiven Geistes in der Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. 2015. “Noumenal Power,” Journal of Political Philosophy 23.2: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart 2012. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Michael 1987. Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael 2011. German Philosophy of Language from Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourier, Charles 1996. The Four Movements, ed. Jones, Gareth Stedman and Patterson, Ian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred 1997. “Unendliche Annäherung”: Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Paul 2005. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1900 1953. “The Interpretation of Dreams,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and trans. Strachey, J., Vol. IV. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1905 1953. “Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria,” in The Standard Edition, ed. and trans. Strachey, J., Vol. VII, pp. 7122. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1913 1958. “On Beginning the Treatment,” in The Standard Edition, ed. and trans. Strachey, J., Vol. XII, pp. 121–44. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1914 1958. “Remembering, Repeating and Working-through,” in The Standard Edition, ed. and trans. Strachey, J., Vol. XII, pp. 145–56. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1915 1957. “The Unconscious,” in The Standard Edition, ed. and trans. Strachey, J., Vol. XIV, pp. 159215. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1923 1961. “The Ego and the Id,” in The Standard Edition, ed. and trans. Strachey, J., Vol. XIX, pp. 1266. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop 1990. Words with Power: Being a Second Study of “The Bible and Literature.” San Diego/New York/London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. 1998. “Zur Logik der Phänomenologie von 1807,” in Materialien zu Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes, ed. Fulda, H. F. and Henrich, D., 4th edn, pp. 391425. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. and Zizek, S. (eds.) 2009. Mythology, Madness, and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 1995. “Auffassungen der Freiheit,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 49: 114.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 1999. “Art and Theodicy,” in Morality, Culture, and History: Essays on German Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78115.Google Scholar
Gourinat, Michel 2004. “Hegel et le stoïcisme,” in Les Stoïciens, ed. Dherbey, G. Romeyer and Gourinat, J.-B.. pp. 523–44. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life, ed. with an introduction by Davidson, Arnold I.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hailperin, Theodore 2004. “Algebraic Logic 1685–1900,” in The Rise of Modern Logic from Leibniz to Frege, ed. Gabbay, Dov M. and Woods, John. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 323–88.Google Scholar
Halbig, C., Quante, M., and Siep, L. (eds.) 2004. Hegels Erbe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2003. On Language and Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. 1976. “Aristotelian Epagoge,” Phronesis 21: 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, E. (ed.) 2007. German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael 1994. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1861. Lectures on the Philosophy of History, trans. Sibree, J.. London: Bohn.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1968–. Gesammelte Werke. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1969–70. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. In Werke, Vols. 8–10. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1976. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 8, ed. Horstmann, R.-P. and Trede, J. H.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1980. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 9, ed. Bonsiepen, W. and Heede, R.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1983. Vorlesungen über Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaften: Heidelberg 1817/18, transcribed Wannenmann, P., ed. Becker, C. et al. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1988. Introduction to the Philosophy of History, trans. Rauch, Leo. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1991a. The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze, trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A., and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1991b. Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1998. “Über ‘speculative Philosophie.’” In Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 5, Schriften und Entwürfe (1799–1808), eds. Ebert, Theodor, Baum, Manfred, and Meist, Kurt Rainer. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2008. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 25.1, Nachschriften zu den Kollegien 1822 und 1825, ed. Bauer, Christoph J.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2011. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 25.2, Nachschriften zu Kolleg 1827/28 und Sekundäre Überlieferung, ed. Bauer, Christoph J.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. and Hoffmeister, J. 1994. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte: Band I: Die Vernunft in der Geschichte. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1975–. Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1981. “Hegels Theorie über den Zufall,” in Hegel in Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1982. “Beauty and Freedom: Schiller’s Struggle with Kant’s Aesthetics,” trans. Lachterman, David, in Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, eds. Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 1992. Kampf um Anerkennung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2001. Leiden an Unbestimmtheit: eine Reaktualisierung der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2010. “The Pathologies of Individual Freedom,” in Hegel’s Social Theory. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2011. Das Recht der Freiheit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2014. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life, trans. Ganahl, Joseph. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2015. Die Idee des Sozialismus: Versuch einer Reaktualisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Jephcott, Edmund. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter 1990. Wahrheit aus dem Begriff: Eine Einführung in Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter 2014. “Hegels Theorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft,” in G. W. F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, ed. Siep, Ludwig, 3rd edn., pp. 193216. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen 2006. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen 2011. “Essence, Reflexion, and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” in A Companion to Hegel, ed. Houlgate, Stephen and Baur, Michael, pp. 139–58. Chichester: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hullot-Kentor, Robert 2006. Things Beyond Resemblance: Collected Essays on Theodor W. Adorno. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn 2007. Inventing Human Rights: A History. London: Norton.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas 1993. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence 2007. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Vol. 1, From Socrates to the Reformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence 2008. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Vol. 2, From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence 2009. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Vol. 3, From Kant to Rawls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F. H. 1968. Werke. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel 2014. Kritik von Lebensformen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans 1996. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kandinsky, Wassily 1977. Concerning the Spiritual in Art, trans. Sadler, M. T. H.. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1960. Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. Greene, Theodore M. and Hudson, Hoyt H.. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 2009. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs, trans. Hannay, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kneale, William Calvert and Kneale, Martha 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane 2003. “Introduction,” in Novalis: Fichte Studies, ed. Kneller, J., pp. ixxxxiv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneller, Jane 2014. “Sociability and the Conduct of Philosophy: What We Can Learn from Early German Romanticism,” in Nassar, (ed.), pp. 110–26.
Kojève, Alexandre 1969. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, ed. Bloom, Allan, trans. Nichols, J. H. Jr. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart 1979. Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kreines, James 2006. “Hegel’s Metaphysics: Changing the Debate,” Philosophy Compass 1.5: 466–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, James 2008. “The Logic of Life: Hegel’s Philosophical Defense of Teleological Explanation of Living Beings,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Beiser, Frederick C., pp. 344–77 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kreines, James 2015. Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, trans. Roudiez, L. S.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques 1978. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles 1996. The Romantic Legacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles 2000. “Hölderlin and Novalis,” in The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, ed. Ameriks, K., pp. 141–60 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lear, J. 2011. A Case for Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lear, J. 2015. Freud. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lear, J. 2016. Wisdom Won from Illness: Essays in Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo 1987. If This Is a Man and the Truce, trans. Woolf, S.. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Loemker, Leroy E. 1976. “Introduction: Leibniz as Philosopher,” in Leibniz, G. W., Philosophical Papers and Letters: A Selection, 2nd edn., ed. Loemker, L. E.. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (ed.) 1962. Die Hegelsche Linke. Stuttgart: F. Frommann.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. 1971. The Theory of the Novel; A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Malabou, C. 2005. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne 2010. “Hegel and the Philosophy of Food,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 7: 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John 1980. “The Role of Eudaimonia in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 15: 114; reprinted in McDowell, John, Mind, Value, and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 322. References are to the reprinted version.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1996. “Two Sorts of Naturalism,” in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, eds. Hursthouse, Rosalind, Lawrence, Gavin, and Quinn, Warren. Oxford: Oxford University Press; reprinted in McDowell, John, Mind, Value, and Reality, pp. 167–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. References are to the reprinted version.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2002. “Responses,” in Smith, (ed.), pp. 269305.
McDowell, John 2009. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McKirahan, Richard D Jr. 1983. “Aristotelian Epagoge in Prior Analytics 2. 21 and Posterior Analytics 1. 1,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, C. 1996. Tragödie im Sittlichen: Gerechtigkeit und Freiheit nach Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Menke, C. 2006. “Spirit and Life: Towards a Genealogical Critique of Phenomenology,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 27: 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, C. 2013a. “Hegel’s Theory of Second Nature: The ‘Lapse’ of Spirit,” Symposium. Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 17: 3149.Google Scholar
Menke, C. 2013b. Force: A Fundamental Concept of Aesthetic Anthropology. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Merker, B. 1990. “Über Gewohnheit,” in Eley, (ed.), pp. 227–43.
Mure, Geoffrey R. G. 1940. An Introduction to Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nassar, Dalia (ed.) 2014. The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, F. 2003. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ng, Karen 2015. “Ideology Critique from Hegel and Marx to Critical Theory,” Constellations 22: 393404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1968. The Twlight of the Idols, trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Novalis, 1960. Novalis: Schriften. Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, ed. Kluckhohn, P. and Samuel, R.. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.Google Scholar
Parret, Herman 2009. “The Ugly as the Beyond of the Sublime,” www.hermanparret.be/media/articles-in-print/21_The-Ugly-as-the-Beyond.pdf
Peperzak, A. 1995. “‘Second Nature’: Place and Significance of the Objective Spirit in Hegel’s Encyclopedia,” The Owl of Minerva 27: 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petry, Michael 1970. Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1993. The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2003. “Agency-Freedom and Option-Freedom,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15: 387403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinkard, Terry 1996. Hegel’s “Phenomenology”: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 2001. “Tugend, Moral und Sittlichkeit: Von Maximen zu Praktiken,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 49:6587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 2002. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 2004. “Innen, Außen und Lebensformen: Hegel und Wittgenstein,” in Halbig, , Quante, , and Siep, (eds.), pp. 254–94.
Pinkard, Terry 2007. “Liberal Rights and Liberal Individualism without Liberalism: Agency and Recognition,” in Hammer, (ed.), pp. 206–24.
Pinkard, Terry 2012. Hegel’s Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 2017. Does History Make Sense? Hegel on the Historical Shapes of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 1990. “Hegel and Category Theory,” Review of Metaphysics 43.4: 839–48.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 1991. Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture. Oxford: Blackwell (2nd edn. 1999).Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 1997a. “Hegel on Historical Meaning: For Example, the Enlightenment,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 35: 117.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 1997b. Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (ms). “The ‘Given’ as a Logical Problem.”
Pippin, Robert B. 2002a. “Leaving Nature Behind,” in Smith, (ed.), pp. 5876.
Pippin, Robert B. 2002b. “What Was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel),” Critical Inquiry 29: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2005a. “Concept and Intuition: On Distinguishability and Separability,” Hegel-Studien 40: 2539.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2005b. The Persistence of Subjectivity: The Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2008a. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2008b. “The ‘Logic of Experience’ as ‘Absolute Knowledge’? On Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit,” in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Critical Guide, ed. Moyar, Dean and Quante, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–27.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2010. “Response to Critics,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53.5: 506–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2011. Hegel on Self-Consciousness: Desire and Death in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2014a. After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2014b. “Reconstructivism: On Honneth’s Hegelianism,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 40: 725–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2014c. “The Significance of Self-Consciousness in Idealist Theories of Logic,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 114, Part 2: 145–66.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2015a. “Finite and Absolute Idealism,” in The Transcendental Turn, ed. Gardner, S. and Grist, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2015b. Interanimations: Receiving Modern German Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2016. “Hegel on Logic as Metaphysics,” in Oxford Handbook of Hegel, ed. Moyar, Dean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, G. 2006. Logik. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto 1998. “Zur Komposition der Phänomenologie des Geistes,” in Materialien zu Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes, ed. Fulda, H. F. and Henrich, D., 4th edn., pp. 329–90. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Posesorski, Ezekial 2012. Between Reinhold and Fichte: August Ludwig Hülsen’s Contribution to the Emergence of German Idealism. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. 1912. “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?,” Mind 21: 2137; reprinted in Prichard 2002, pp. 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prichard, H. A. 1929. Duty and Interest. Oxford: Clarendon Press; reprinted in Prichard 2002, pp. 2149.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. 2002. Moral Writings, ed. MacAdam, Jim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. 1969 [1849]. Bekenntnisse eines Revolutionärs. Hamburg: Reinbek.Google Scholar
Quante, M. 2004. Hegel’s Concept of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” Philosophical Review 60: 2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1925. “Universals,” Mind 34: 401–17.Google Scholar
Rand, Sebastian 2015. “What Is Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality,” European Journal of Philosophy 23: 6886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, Paul 2014. “The Role of Logic ‘Commonly So Called’ in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 281301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl 2005. Letters on the Kantian Philosophy [1786–1787]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rödl, Sebastian 2007. Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, Karl 1853. Ästhetik des Häßlichen. Königsberg: Gebrüder Bornträger.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz 2010. Hegel und der Staat, ed. Lachmann, Frank. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1984. Diskurs über die Ungleichheit / Discours sur l’inégalité, ed. Meier, Heinrich. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1997. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich 1967. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, trans. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L.A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich 1991. “Athenaeum Fragments [1798],” in Philosophical Fragments, trans. Firchow, G.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl 1996. The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1992. Science and Metaphysics, Variations on Kantian Themes. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2010. “Toleranz und Anerkennung bei Kant und im Deutschen Idealismus,” in Aktualität und Grenzen der praktischen Philosophie Hegels, pp. 7791. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2011a. Hegels Praktische Philosophie und das “Projekt der Moderne.” Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2011b. “Moralität und Sittlichkeit bei Hegel,” in Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, ed. Hiltscher, Reinhard and Klingner, Stefan, pp. 211–32. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2013. “Natur und Freiheit: Hegelsche Perspektiven auf gegenwärtige Fragen,” in Freiheit: Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 2011, ed. Hinrichs, Gunnar and Honneth, Axel. Frankfurt: Klostermann, pp. 5583.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2014a. Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie, 2nd edn. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2014b. Hegel’s “Phenomenology of Spirit.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2015. Der Staat als Irdischer Gott: Genese und Relevanz einer Hegelschen Idee. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Shook, J.R. and Good, J. A. 2010. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Spirit, with the 1897 Lecture on Hegel. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Shuster, Martin 2014. Autonomy after Auschwitz: Adorno, German Idealism, and Modernity. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. 1995. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (ed.) 2002. Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert 2009. Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert 2012. Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert 2015. “The Ethics of the British Idealists: Perfectionism After Kant,” in The Cambridge History of Ethics, ed. Golub, Sasha and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere O’Neill 2012. “Introduction,” in Hegel and Language, ed. Surber, Jere O’Neill. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C 1992. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael 2004. “Apprehending Human Form,” in Modern Moral Philosophy, ed. O’Hear, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael 2013. “Forms of Nature: ‘First,’ ‘Second,’ ‘Living,’ ‘Rational’ and ‘Phronetic’,” in Freiheit: Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress, ed. Hindrichs, G. and Honneth, A.. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 701–35.Google Scholar
Traverso, Enzo 2003. The Origins of Nazi Violence, trans. Lloyd, Janet. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, Jim 2007. Hegel’s Philosophy of Language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Weininger, Otto 1997. Über die letzten Dinge. Munich: Matthes & Seitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996. Aristotle’s De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wiland, E. 2012. Reasons. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, M. 1992. Das Körper-Seele-Problem: Kommentar zu Hegel, Enzyklopädie (1830), § 389. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1990. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, David W. 2014. “The Mathematical ‘Wissenschaftslehre’: On a Late Fichtean Reflection of Novalis,” in Nassar, (ed.), pp. 258–72.
Yeomans, C. 2011. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa 2015. “Review of Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric, by Scott R. Stroud,” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/59654-kant-and-the-promise-of-rhetoric/

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Rachel Zuckert, Northwestern University, Illinois, James Kreines, Claremont McKenna College, California
  • Book: Hegel on Philosophy in History
  • Online publication: 27 January 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145012.015
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Rachel Zuckert, Northwestern University, Illinois, James Kreines, Claremont McKenna College, California
  • Book: Hegel on Philosophy in History
  • Online publication: 27 January 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145012.015
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Rachel Zuckert, Northwestern University, Illinois, James Kreines, Claremont McKenna College, California
  • Book: Hegel on Philosophy in History
  • Online publication: 27 January 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145012.015
Available formats
×