Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T12:32:38.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 6 - Postpartum Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Philip J. Steer
Affiliation:
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Affiliation:
Royal Brompton Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Spatling, L, Fallenstein, F, Huch, A, et al. The variability of cardiopulmonary adaptation to pregnancy at rest and during exercise. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99(Suppl 8):140.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahendru, AM, Everett, TR, Wilkinson, IB, et al. A longitudinal study of maternal cardiovascular function from preconception to the postpartum period. J Hypertens 2014;32:849–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilson, GJ, Samaan, S, Crawford, MH, et al. Changes in hemodynamics, ventricular remodelling, and ventricular contractility during normal pregnancy: A longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:957–62.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Cotton, DB, Lee, W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1439–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burlingame, J, Ohana, P, Aaronoff, M, et al. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring in pregnancy: Impedance cardiography versus echocardiography. J Perinatol 2013;33:675–80.Google Scholar
Fok, WY, Chan, LY, Wong, JT, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function during normal pregnancy: Assessment by spectral tissue Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:789–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducas, RA, Elliott, JE, Melnyk, SF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnancy: Insights from the cardiac hemodynamic imaging and remodeling in pregnancy (CHIRP) study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savu, O, Jurcut, R, Giusca, S, et al. Morphological and functional adaptation of the maternal heart during pregnancy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:289–97.Google Scholar
Zlatnik, MG. Pulmonary edema: Etiology and treatment. Seminars in Perinatology 1997;21:298306.Google Scholar
Hansen, JM, Ueland, K. The influence of caudal analgesia on cardiovascular dynamics during normal labour and delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1966;23:449–52.Google Scholar
Hendricks, CH, Quilligan, EJ. Cardiac output during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1956;71:953–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, SL, Cotton, DB, Pivarnik, JM,et al. Position change and central hemodynamic profile during normal third-trimester pregnancy and postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:883–7.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, J. Hemodynamic investigations during labour and delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979;58(Suppl 89):77197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, SC, Dunlop, W, Hunter, S. Haemodynamic changes during the early puerperium. Br Med J 1987;294:1065.Google Scholar
Kahn, S, Melikian, N, Mushemi-Blake, S, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of post-partum ventricular remodelling: implications for the detection of cardiac disease. Heart 2014;100(Suppl 3):A61–2.Google Scholar
Robson, SC, Hunter, S, Moore, M, et al. Haemodynamic changes during the puerperium: A Doppler and M-mode echocardiographic study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:1028–39.Google Scholar
Kerr, MG. Cardiovascular dynamics in pregnancy and labour. Br Med Bull 1968;24:1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbasi, FR, Bottoms, S, Farag, A, et al. Changes in hemostasis activity during delivery and the immediate postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gyncol 1990;162:1158–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakley, C, ed. Heart disease in pregnancy. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1997.Google Scholar
Gleicher, N, Midwall, J, Hochberger, D, et al. Eisenmenger’s syndrome and pregnancy. Obst Gyn Surv 1979;34:721–41.Google Scholar
Slomka, F, Salmeron, S, Zetlaoui, P, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy: Anesthetic management for delivery. Anesthesiology 1988;69:959–61.Google Scholar
Harvey, JR, Teague, SM, Anderson, JL, et al. Clinically silent atrial septal defects with evidence for cerebral embolisation. Ann Intern Med 1986;105:695–7.Google Scholar
Daliento, L, Somerville, J, Presbitero, P, et al. Eisenmenger syndrome: Factors relating to deterioration and death. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1845–55.Google Scholar
Ladner, HE, Danielsen, B, Gilbert, WM. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy and the puerperium: A population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:480–4.Google Scholar
Satoh, H, Sano, M, Suwa, K et al. Pregnancy-related acute myocardial infarction in Japan. A review of epidemiology, etiology and treatment from case reports. Circ J 2013;77:725–33.Google Scholar
Sheikh, AS, O’Sullivan, M. Pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Two case reports and a comprehensive review of literature. Heart Views 2012;13:5365.Google Scholar
Kim, K-M, Sukhani, R, Slogoff, S, et al. Central hemodynamic changes associated with pregnancy in a long-term cardiac transplant recipient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1651–3.Google Scholar
Bonnin, M, Mercier, FJ, Sitbon, O, et al. Severe pulmonary hypertension during pregnancy. Anesthesiology 2005;102:1133–7.Google Scholar
Witlin, AG, Mabie, WC, Sibai, BM. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: A longitudinal echocardiographic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1129–32.Google Scholar
Sliwa, K, Hilfiker-Kleiner, D, Petrie, MC, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12:767–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyatt, JR, Dubey, G. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: Current understanding, comprehensive management review and new developments. Postgrad Med J 2011;87:34–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veldtman, GR, Connolly, HM, Grogan, M, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy in women with tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:174–80.Google Scholar
Kamiya, CA, Iwamiya, T, Neki, R, et al. Outcome of pregnancy and effects on the right heart in women with repaired tetralogy of fallot. Circ J 2012;76:957–63.Google Scholar
Cannobio, MM, Mair, DD, Van de Velde, M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after the Fontan repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:763–7.Google Scholar
Chan, WS, Anand, S, Ginsberg, JS. Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: A systematic review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:191–6.Google Scholar
Avila, WS, Rossi, EG, Grinberg, M. Influence of pregnancy after bioprosthetic valve replacement in young women: A prospective five-year study. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:864–9.Google Scholar
Head, CEG, Thorne, SA. Congenital heart disease in pregnancy. Postgrad Med J 2005;81:292–8.Google Scholar
Seth, R, Moss, AJ, McNitt, S, et al. Long QT syndrome and pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1092–8.Google Scholar
Scott, JR, Wagoner, LE, Olsen, SL,et al. Pregnancy in heart transplant recipients: Management and outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:324–7.Google Scholar
Jackson, GM, Dildy, GA, Varner, MW, et al. Severe pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy following successful repair of ventriculoseptal defect in childhood. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:680–2.Google Scholar
Auler, JOC, Torres, MLA, Cardoso, MM et al. Clinical evaluation of the flotrac/VigileoTM system for continuous cardiac output monitoring in patients undergoing regional anesthesia for elective caesarean section: A pilot study. Clinics 2010;65:793–8.Google Scholar
Peyton, PJ, Chong, SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care. A meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1220–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belfort, MA, Rokey, R, Saade, GR, et al. Rapid echocardiographic assessment of left and right heart hemodynamics in critically ill obstetric patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:884–92.Google Scholar
Penny, JA, Anthony, J, Shennan, AH, et al. A comparison of hemodynamic data derived by pulmonary artery flotation catheter and the esophageal Doppler monitor in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:658–61.Google Scholar
Kager, CC, Dekker, GA, Stam, MC. Measurement of cardiac output in normal pregnancy by a non-invasive two-diensional independent Doppler device. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:142–4.Google Scholar
Goodwin, TM, Gherman, RB, Hameed, A, et al. Favorable response of Eisenmenger syndrome to inhaled nitric oxide during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:64–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bildirici, I, Shumway, JB. Intravenous and inhaled epoprostenol for primary pulmonary hypertension during pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1102–5.Google Scholar
Easterling, TR, Ralph, DD, Schmucker, BC. Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy: Treatment with pulmonary vasodilators. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:494–8.Google Scholar
Lacassie, HJ, Germain, AM, Valdés, G, et al. Management of Eisenmenger syndrome in pregnancy with sildenafil and L-arginine. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1118–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, R, Pickett, JA. Pregnancy and the univentricular heart: Case report and literature review. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000;9:5563.Google Scholar

References

Colman, JM, Silversides, CK, Siu, SC. Impact of pregnancy on long-term outcomes in women with heart disease. In: Steer, P, Gatzoulis, MA, Baker, P, eds. Cardiac Disease and Pregnancy. London: RCOG Press; 2006. pp. 313–18.Google Scholar
Le Gloan, L, Mercier, LA, Dore, A, et al. Pregnancy in women with Fontan physiology. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 2011;9:1547–56.Google Scholar
Naguib, MA, Dob, DP, Gatzoulis, MA. A functional understanding of moderate to complex congenital heart disease and the impact of pregnancy. Part II: Tetralogy of Fallot, Eisenmenger’s syndrome and the Fontan operation. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010;19:306–12.Google Scholar
Balint, OH, Siu, SC, Mason, J, et al. Silversides CK. Cardiac outcomes after pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. Heart 2010;96:1656–61.Google Scholar
European Society of Gynecology (ESG), Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC), German Society for Gender Medicine (DGesGM), et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: The Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:3147–97.Google Scholar
Hunter, S, Robson, SC. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Br Heart J 1992;68:540–3.Google Scholar
Savu, O, Jurcu, R, Giusca, S, et al. Morphological and Functional Adaptation of the Maternal Heart During Pregnancy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:289–97.Google Scholar
Silversides, CK, Colman, JM, Sermer, M, Siu, S. Cardiac risk in pregnant women with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1382–5.Google Scholar
Esteves, CA, Munoz, JS, Braga, S, et al. Immediate and long-term follow-up of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in pregnant patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:812–16.Google Scholar
Uebing, A, Arvanitis, P, Li, W, et al. Effect of pregnancy on clinical status and ventricular function in women with heart disease Int J Cardiol 2010;139:50–9.Google Scholar
Cornette, J, Ruys, TPE, Rossi, A, et al. Hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy in women with structural heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:825–31.Google Scholar
Bedard, E, Dimopoulos, K, Gatzoulis, MA. Has there been any progress made on pregnancy outcomes among women with pulmonary arterial hypertension? Eur Heart J 2009;30:256–65.Google Scholar
Jaïs, X, Olsson, KM, Barbera, JA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Eur Respir J 2012;40:881–5.Google Scholar
Duarte, AG, Thomas, S, Safdar, Z, et al. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension during pregnancy: A retrospective, multicenter experience. Chest 2013;143:1330–6.Google Scholar
Kiely, DG, Condliffe, R, Webster, V, et al. Improved survival in pregnancy and pulmonary hypertension using a multiprofessional approach. BJOG 2010; 117:565–74.Google Scholar
Kamiya, CA, Iwamiya, T, Neki, R, et al. Outcome of pregnancy and effects on the right heart in women with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Circ J 2012;76:957–63.Google Scholar
Guedes, S, Mercier, L-A, Leduc, L, et al. Impact of pregnancy on the systemic right ventricle after a Mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:433–7.Google Scholar
Metz, TD, Jackson, GM, Yetman, AT. Pregnancy outcomes in women who have undergone an atrial switch repair for congenital d-transposition of the great arteries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:273.e1–5.Google Scholar
Zentner, D, Wheeler, M, Grigg, L. Does pregnancy contribute to systemic right ventricular dysfunction in adults with an atrial switch operation? Heart, Lung and Circulation 2012;21:433–8.Google Scholar
Bowater, SE, Selman, TJ, Hudsmith, LE, et al. Long-term outcome following pregnancy in women with a systemic right ventricle: Is the deterioration due to pregnancy or a consequence of time? Congenit Heart Dis. 2013;8:302–7.Google Scholar
Siu, SC, Sermer, M, Colman, JM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation 2001;104:515–21.Google Scholar
Khairy, P, Ouyang, DW, Fernandes, SM, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital heart disease. Circulation 2006;113:517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balci, A, Drenthen, W, Mulder, BJM, et al. Pregnancy in women with corrected tetralogy of Fallot: Occurrence and predictors of adverse events. Am Heart J 2011;161:307–13.Google Scholar
Assenza, GE, Cassater, D, Landzberg, M, et al. The effects of pregnancy on right ventricular remodeling in women with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:1847–52.Google Scholar
Metz, TD, Hayes, SA, Garcia, CY, et al. Impact of pregnancy on the cardiac health of women with prior surgeries for pulmonary valve anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:370.e1–6.Google Scholar
Grewal, J, Siu, SC, Ross, HJ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:4552.Google Scholar
Katsuragi, S, Omoto, A, Kamiya, C, et al. Risk factors for maternal outcome in pregnancy complicated with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Perinatol 2012;32(3):170–5.Google Scholar
Sliwa, K, Blauwet, L, Tibazarwa, K, et al. Evaluation of bromocriptine in the treatment of acute severe peripartum cardiomyopathy: A proof-of-concept pilot study. Circulation 2010;121:1465–73.Google Scholar
van Tintelen, JP, Pieper, PG, Van Spaendonck-Zwarts, KY, et al. Pregnancy, cardiomyopathies and genetics. Cardiovasc Res 2014;101:571–78.Google Scholar
Silversides, CK, Colman, JM, Sermer, M, et al. Early and intermediate-term outcomes of pregnancy with congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1386–9.Google Scholar
Tzemos, N, Silversides, CK, Colman, JM, et al. Late cardiac outcomes after pregnancy in women with congenital aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 2009;157:474–80.Google Scholar
Dore, A, Somerville, J. Pregnancy in patients with pulmonary autograft valve replacement. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1659–62.Google Scholar
Badduke, BR, Jamieson, WR, Miyagishima, RT, et al. Pregnancy and childbearing in a population with biologic valvular prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:179186.Google Scholar
Sadler, L, McCowan, L, White, H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and cardiac complications in women with mechanical, bioprosthetic and homograft valves. BJOG 2000;107:245–53.Google Scholar
Jamieson, WR, Miller, DC, Akins, CW, et al. Pregnancy and bioprostheses: Influence on structural valve deterioration. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(2 Suppl):S282–6.Google Scholar
El, SF, Hassan, W, Latriche, B, et al. Pregnancy has no effect on the rate of structural deterioration of bioprosthetic valves: Long-term 18-year follow up results. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:481–5.Google Scholar
Cleuziou, J, Hörer, J, Kaemmerer, H, et al. Pregnancy does not accelerate biological valve degeneration. Int J Cardiol 2010;145:418–21.Google Scholar
Rossiter, JP, Repke, JT, Morales, AJ, et al. A prospective longitudinal evaluation of pregnancy in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1599–606.Google Scholar
Meijboom, LJ, Vos, FE, Timmermans, J, et al. Pregnancy and aortic root growth in the Marfan syndrome: A prospective study. Eur Heart J 2005;26:914–20.Google Scholar
Donnelly, RT, Pinto, NM, Kocolas, I, et al. The immediate and long-term impact of pregnancy on aortic growth rate and mortality in women with Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:224–9.Google Scholar
Verma, S, Siu, SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1920–9.Google Scholar
McKellar, SH, MacDonald, RJ, Michelena, HI, et al. Frequency of cardiovascular events in women with a congenitally bicuspid aortic valve in a single community and effect of pregnancy on events. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:96–9.Google Scholar

References

Lund, CJ, Donovan, JC. Blood volume during pregnancy. Significance of plasma and red cell volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967;98:394403.Google Scholar
Chesley, LC. Plasma and red cell volumes during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;112:440–50.Google Scholar
Ueland, K. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. VII. Intrapartum blood volume changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:671–7.Google Scholar
Robson, SC, Hunter, S, Boys, RJ, et al. Serial study of factors influencing changes in cardiac output during human pregnancy. Am J Physiol 1989;256(4 Pt 2): H1060–5.Google Scholar
Mabie, WC, DiSessa, TG, Crocker, LG, et al. A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:849–56.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Cotton, DB, Lee, W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(6 Pt 1):1439–42.Google Scholar
Katz, R, Karliner, JS, Resnik, R. Effects of a natural volume overload state (pregnancy) on left ventricular performance in normal human subjects. Circulation 1978;58(3 Pt 1):434–41.Google Scholar
Capeless, EL, Clapp, JF. Cardiovascular changes in early phase of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(6 Pt 1):1449–53.Google Scholar
Guedes, A, Mercier, LA, Leduc, L, et al. Impact of pregnancy on the systemic right ventricle after a Mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:433–7.Google Scholar
Uebing, A, Arvanitis, P, Li, W, et al. Effect of pregnancy on clinical status and ventricular function in women with heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2010;139:50–9.Google Scholar
Elkayam, U. Pregnant again after peripartum cardiomyopathy: To be or not to be? Eur Heart J 2002;23:753–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sliwa, K, Fett, J, Elkayam, U. Peripartum cardiomyopathy. Lancet 2006;368:687–93.Google Scholar
Elkayam, U, Akhter, MW, Singh, H, et al. Pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy: Clinical characteristics and a comparison between early and late presentation. Circulation 2005;111:2050–5.Google Scholar
Lampert, MB, Weinert, L, Hibbard, J, et al. Contractile reserve in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and recovered left ventricular function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(1 Pt 1):189–95.Google Scholar
Pearson, GD, Veille, JC, Rahimtoola, S, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Office of Rare Diseases (National Institutes of Health) workshop recommendations and review. JAMA 2000;283:1183–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elkayam, U, Tummala, PP, Rao, K, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1567–71. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2001;345:552.Google Scholar
Milewicz, DM, Pyeritz, RE, Crawford, ES, et al. Marfan syndrome: Defective synthesis, secretion, and extracellular matrix formation of fibrillin by cultured dermal fibroblasts. J Clin Invest 1992;89:7986.Google Scholar
Milewicz, DM, Grossfield, J, Cao, SN, et al. A mutation in FBN1 disrupts profibrillin processing and results in isolated skeletal features of the Marfan syndrome. J Clin Invest 1995;95:2373–8.Google Scholar
Dietz, HC, Cutting, GR, Pyeritz, RE, et al. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature 1991;352:337–9.Google Scholar
Rossiter, JP, Repke, JT, Morales, AJ, et al. A prospective longitudinal evaluation of pregnancy in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1599–606.Google Scholar
Pyeritz, RE. Maternal and fetal complications of pregnancy in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med 1981;71:784–90.Google Scholar
Lipscomb, KJ, Smith, JC, Clarke, B, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in women with Marfan syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:201–6.Google Scholar
Dodds, GA, 3rd, Warnes, CA, Danielson, GK. Aortic valve replacement after repair of pulmonary atresia and ventricular septal defect or tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:736–41.Google Scholar
Niwa, K, Perloff, JK, Bhuta, SM, et al. Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: Light and electron microscopic analyses. Circulation 2001;103:393400.Google Scholar
Warnes, CA. Bicuspid aortic valve and coarctation: Two villains part of a diffuse problem. Heart 2003;89:965–6.Google Scholar
Warnes, CA, Child, JS. Aortic root dilatation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: Pathology from the past? Circulation 2002;106:1310–11.Google Scholar
de Sa, M, Moshkovitz, Y, Butany, J, et al. Histologic abnormalities of the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: Clinical relevance to the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:588–94.Google Scholar
Fedak, PW, Verma, S, David, TE, et al. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 2002;106:900–4.Google Scholar
Nistri, S, Sorbo, MD, Marin, M, et al. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 1999;82:1922.Google Scholar
Sabet, HY, Edwards, WD, Tazelaar, HD, et al. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: A surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:1426.Google Scholar
Edwards, WD, Leaf, DS, Edwards, JE. Dissecting aortic aneurysm associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 1978;57:1022–5.Google Scholar
Wolinsky, H. Effects of estrogen and progestogen treatment on the response of the aorta of male rats to hypertension. Morphological and chemical studies. Circ Res 1972;30:341–9.Google Scholar
Carlson, RG, Lillehei, CW, Edwards, JE. Cystic medial necrosis of the ascending aorta in relation to age and hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1970;25:411–15.Google Scholar
European Society of Gynecology (ESG), Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC), German Society for Gender Medicine (DGesGM), et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: The Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:3147–97.Google Scholar
Matura, LA, Ho, VB, Rosing, DR, et al. Aortic dilatation and dissection in Turner syndrome. Circulation 2007;116:1663–70.Google Scholar
Born, D, Martinez, EE, Almeida, PA, et al. Pregnancy in patients with prosthetic heart valves: The effects of anticoagulation on mother, fetus, and neonate. Am Heart J 1992;124:413–17.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, U, Milano, A, Mazzucco, A, et al. Pregnancy in patients with a porcine valve bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:1051–4.Google Scholar
Badduke, BR, Jamieson, WR, Miyagishima, RT, et al. Pregnancy and childbearing in a population with biologic valvular prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:179–86.Google Scholar
Sadler, L, McCowan, L, White, H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and cardiac complications in women with mechanical, bioprosthetic and homograft valves. BJOG 2000;107:245–53.Google Scholar
Sbarouni, E, Oakley, CM. Outcome of pregnancy in women with valve prostheses. Br Heart J 1994;71:196201.Google Scholar
North, RA, Sadler, L, Stewart, AW, et al. Long-term survival and valve-related complications in young women with cardiac valve replacements. Circulation 1999;99:2669–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salazar, E, Espinola, N, Roman, L, Casanova, JM. Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Am Heart J 1999;137(4 Pt 1):714–20.Google Scholar
Jamieson, WR, Miller, DC, Akins, CW, et al. Pregnancy and bioprostheses: Influence on structural valve deterioration. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(2 Suppl):S282–6; discussion S287.Google Scholar
Yun, KL, Miller, DC, Moore, KA, et al. Durability of the Hancock MO bioprosthesis compared with standard aortic valve bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(2 Suppl):S221–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×