Routine Embryo Screening and Surrogacy

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316282618.013

Chapter 13 - Routine Embryo Screening and Surrogacy

Current Challenges and Future Directions for Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2016

E. Scott Sills ,

Robert E. Anderson and

Mary McCaffrey

Edited by

E. Scott Sills

Show author details

E. Scott Sills: Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Genetics, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy
International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues
, pp. 93 - 98

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282618.013[Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook

References

Brinsden, PR. Gestational surrogacy. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9(5):483–91.

Raziel, A, Friedler, S, Gidoni, Y, et al. Surrogate in vitro fertilization outcome in typical and atypical forms of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(1):126–30.

Sheean, LA, Goldfarb, JM, et al. In vitro fertilization (IVF)-surrogacy: application of IVF to women without functional uteri. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1989; 6:134–7.

van den Akker, OB. Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13:53–62.

Teman, E. The medicalization of “nature” in the “artificial body”: surrogate motherhood in Israel. Med Anthropol Q 2003; 17:78–98.

Appleton, T. Surrogacy. Curr Obstet Gynecol 2001; 2:256–7.

Franasiak, JM, Forman, EJ, Hong, KH et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:656–63.

Sills, ES. An evidence-based policy for the provision of subsidised fertility treatment in California: integration of array comparative genomic hybridisation with IVF and mandatory single embryo transfer to lower multiple gestation and preterm birth rates. Ph.D. thesis, University of Westminster-London, 2012 (British Library EthOS uk.bl.ethos.576982).

Schoolcraft, WB, and Katz-Jaffe, MG. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:615–19.

Wu, MY, Chao, KH, Chen, CD, et al. Current status of comprehensive chromosome screening for elective single-embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014. doi.org/10.1155/2014/581783.

Scott, RT Jr, Upham, KM, Forman, EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:697–703.

Bell, CJ, Dinwiddie, DL, Miller, NA, et al. Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3(65):65–4.

Yin, X, Tan, K, Vajta, G, et al. Massively parallel sequencing for chromosomal abnormality testing in trophectoderm cells of human blastocysts. Biol Reprod 2013; 88(3):69.

Tan, Y, Yin, X, Zhang, S, et al. Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing. Gigascience 2014; 3(1):30.

Treff, NR, Fedick, A, Tao, X, et al. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril 2013; 99(5):1377–1384.e6.

Munné, S, Ary, J, Zouves, C, et al. Wide range of chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of young egg donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12(3):340–346.

Sills, ES, Li, X, Frederick, JL, Khoury, CD et al. Determining parental origin of embryo aneuploidy: analysis of genetic error observed in 305 embryos derived from anonymous donor oocyte IVF cycles. Mol Cytogenet 2014; 7(1):68.

Ben-Rafael, Z, Bar-Hava, I, Levy, T, et al. Simplifying ovulation induction for surrogacy in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(6):1470–1.

Morcel, K, Guerrier, D, Watrin, T, et al. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: clinical description and genetics. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2008; 37(6):539–46.

Fisher, K, Esham, RH, and Thorneycroft, I. Scoliosis associated with typical Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. South Med J 2000; 93(2):243–6.

Griffin, JE, Edwards, C, and Madden, JD. Congenital absence of the vagina: the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1976; 85(2):224–36.

Batzer, FR, Corson, SL, Gocial, B, et al. Genetic offspring in patients with vaginal agenesis: specific medical and legal issues. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167(5):1288–92.

Acién, P, Acién, M, and Sánchez-Ferrer, M. Complex malformations of the female genital tract: new types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(10):2377–84.

Biason-Lauber, A, Konrad, D, Navratil, F, et al. A WNT4 mutation associated with Müllerian-duct regression and virilization in a 46,XX woman. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(8):792–8.

Drummond, JB, Reis, FM, Boson, WL, et al. Molecular analysis of the WNT4 gene in six patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(3):857–859.

Sultan, C, Biason-Lauber, A, and Philibert, P. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: recent clinical and genetic findings. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009; 25(1):8–11.

Miller, C, Pavlova, A, and Sassoon, DA. Differential expression patterns of Wnt genes in the murine female reproductive tract during development and the estrous cycle. Mech Dev 1998; 76:91–9.

Miller, C, Degenhardt, K, and Sassoon, DA. Fetal exposure to DES results in de-regulation of Wnt7a during uterine morphogenesis. Nat Genet 1998; 20:228–30.

Vainio, S, Heikkila, M, Kispert, A, et al. Female development in mammals is regulated by Wnt-4 signalling. Nature 1999; 397:405–9.

Jordan, BK, Mohammed, M, Ching, ST, et al. Up-regulation of WNT-4 signaling and dosage-sensitive sex reversal in humans. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68(5):1102–9.

Bernardini, L, Gimelli, S, Gervasini, C, et al. Recurrent microdeletion at 17q12 as a cause of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: two case reports. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2009; 4(1).

Ledig, S, Schippert, C, Strick, R, et al. Recurrent aberrations identified by array-CGH in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 2011;95(5):1589–1594.

Devriendt, K, Jaeken, J, Matthijs, G, et al. Haploinsufficiency of the HOXA gene cluster in a patient with hand-foot-genital syndrome, velopharyngeal insufficiency, and persistent patent ductus Botalli. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65(1):249–51.

Innis, JW. Priming the search for HOX mutations. Teratology 2002; 65(2):47–9.

Guerrier, D, Mouchel, T, Pasquier, L, et al. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (congenital absence of uterus and vagina): phenotypic manifestations and genetic approaches. J Neg Results Biomed 2006; 5:1.

Connell, M, Owen, C, and Segars, J. Genetic syndromes and genes involved in the development of the female reproductive tract: a possible role for gene therapy. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther 2013; 4:127.

Sills, ES, Goldschlag, D, Levy, DP, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: considerations for use in elective human embryo sex selection. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16(10):509–11.

Pennings, G. Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2339–43.

Liu, P, and Rose, GA. Sex selection: the right way forward. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2343–5.

Dawson, K, and Trounson, A. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing: why balance families? Hum Reprod 1996; 12:2577–8.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Sex Selection: Options for Regulation: A Report on the HFEA’s 2002–2003 Review of Sex Selection Including a Discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Options (London: HFEA, 2003).

Sills, ES, and Palermo, GD. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for elective sex selection, the IVF market economy, and the child: another long day’s journey into night? J Assist Reprod Genet 2002; 19(9):433–7.