Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-mqrwx Total loading time: 0.637 Render date: 2022-12-03T09:49:54.372Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 7 - Data Analyses that Meet Current Standards of the Profession

from Part II - Parts of Articles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Robert J. Sternberg
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abelson, R. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . (2013). Making methods clearer. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . (2014). More bang for your byte. Scientific Data, 1, 140010. doi:10.1038/sdata.2014.10Google Scholar
Barnes, N. (2010). Publish your computer code: It is good enough. Nature, 467, 753. doi:10.1038/467753aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begley, C. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2015). Reproducibility in science. Improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circulation Research, 116, 116126. ScholarPubMed
Buckheit, J., & Donoho, D. L. (1995). Wavelab and reproducible research. In Antoniadis, A. & Oppenheim, G. (Eds.), Wavelets and statistics (pp. 5581). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29, 158159.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 13041312. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.12.1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. X. (2017). Rigor and replication in time-frequency analyses of cognitive electrophysiology data. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111(Supplement C), 8087. doi: ScholarPubMed
Coppock, A. (2015). 10 things you need to know about multiple comparisons. Retrieved from
Dumas-Mallet, E., Button, K. S., Boraud, T., Gonon, F., & Munafò, M. R. (2017). Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 160254. doi:10.1098/rsos.160254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forstmeier, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Parker, T. H. (2017). Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings – a practical guide. Biological Reviews, 92, 19411968. doi:10.1111/brv.12315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorgolewski, K. J., Margulies, D., & Milham, M. (2013). Making data sharing count: A publication-based solution. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(9). doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorgolewski, K. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016). A practical guide for improving transparency and reproducibility in neuroimaging research. PLoS Biology, 14(7), 113. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haeffel, G. J., Hein, S., Square, A., Macomber, D., Lee, M., Chapman, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Evaluating a social problem solving intervention for juvenile detainees: Depressive outcomes and moderators of effectiveness. Development and Psychopathology, 29(3), 10351042. doi:10.1017/S0954579416001000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hein, S., Tan, M., Rakhlin, N., Doyle, N., Hart, L., Macomber, D., … Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Psychological and sociocultural adaptation of children adopted from Russia and their associations with pre-adoption risk factors and parenting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 26692680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, S. A., Wallach, J. D., Khoury, M. J., Schully, S. D., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Reproducible research practices and transparency across the biomedical literature. PLoS Biology, 14, e1002333. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellmeyer, P. (2017). Ethical and legal implications of the methodological crisis in neuroimaging. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 26, 530554. doi:10.1017/S096318011700007XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196217. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatzky, R., Au, T., Berntsen, D., Bar, M., Dawson, G., Hartfiled, E. A., … Weber, E. (2018). Firm foundations: Leading researchers name the most replicated findings in psychological science. Observer, 31(1), 2528.Google Scholar
Laws, K. R. (2016). Psychology, replication & beyond. BMC Psychology, 4, 30. doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, O. M., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Methods reporting in human laboratory studies. Addiction, 108, 10021003. doi:10.1111/add.12132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd edn.). Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing.Google Scholar
Mourgues, C., Tan, M., Hein, S., Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Using creativity to predict future academic performance: An application of Aurora's five subtests for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 378386. doi: Scholar
Mummendey, A. (2012). Scientific misconduct in social psychology – Towards a currency reform in science. European Bulletin of Social Psychology, 24, 47.Google Scholar
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., … Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0021. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82, 591605. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pampaka, M., Hutcheson, G., & Williams, J. (2016). Handling missing data: Analysis of a challenging data set using multiple imputation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39, 1937. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.979146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, P., Peng, R. D., & Leek, J. T. (2016). What should researchers expect when they replicate studies? A statistical view of replicability in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 539544. doi:10.1177/1745691616646366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, R. D. (2015). The reproducibility crisis in science: A statistical counterattack. Significance, 12, 3032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE, 2, e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J. W. (2014). Metascience could rescue the “replication crisis.” Nature, 515, 9. doi:10.1038/515009aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 13591366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, J. R. (2017). Replicability and reproducibility in comparative psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 862. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00862CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 5971. doi:10.1177/1745691613514450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. PLoS Biology, 15, e2000797. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandewalle, P. (2012). Code sharing is associated with research impact in image processing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 14(4), 4247. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2012.63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p-values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779804. doi:10.3758/bf03194105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426432. doi:10.1037/a0022790CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6, e26828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026828CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats