Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-bmzkg Total loading time: 0.575 Render date: 2022-07-04T08:44:22.895Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

1 - Implications of Ingroup-Outgroup Membership for Interpersonal Perceptions: Faces and Emotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Jennifer Richeson
Northwestern University
John F. Dovidio
University of Connecticut
J. Nicole Shelton
Princeton University
Michelle Hebl
Rice University
Ursula Hess
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Pierre Philippot
Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Get access


Authors' Note

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer A. Richeson, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. E-mail:


Nonverbal behavior is a critical component of social interaction. People rely on nonverbal aspects of behavior during interactions to assess how their interaction partners are feeling and how to respond to them (Feldman, Philippot, & Custrini, 1991). One aspect of nonverbal behavior that can be influential in shaping the dynamics of interpersonal interaction is the communication of emotion. Indeed, the ability to accurately decode the emotional states of others from nonverbal facial and vocal cues has been found to predict social competence (e.g., Feldman et al., 1991; Glanville & Nowicki, 2002).

Recent research suggests that cultural-group membership may play an important role in the accurate communication (i.e., encoding and decoding) of emotion (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2002a, 2002b). Building on this work, we propose that the psychological processes associated with social categorization and social identity produce systematic biases in the recognition of emotion from facial expressions across members of different groups. Thus, the present chapter examines emotional facial expression and communication in an intergroup context. To provide a general conceptual foundation for the relevance of group membership to the communication of emotion, we begin by briefly reviewing how group membership fundamentally affects the way people think about, feel about, and act toward others.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Adams, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion, 5, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaupré, M. G., & Hess, U. (2003). In my mind, we all smile: A case of ingroup favoritism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaupré, M. G., & Hess, U. (2005). Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition: Vol Ⅺ. Stereotype activation and inhibition (pp. 1–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brigham, J. C. (2005). The role of race and racial prejudice in recognizing other people. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 2005: Motivational Aspects of Prejudice and Racism.
Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Gender-based expectancies and observer judgments of smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Collins, M., & Nowicki, S. (2001). African American children's ability to identify emotion in facial expressions and tones of voice of European Americans. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 334–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortes, B. P., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, R. T., Rodriguez, A. P., & Leyens, J. (2005). Infrahumanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 36 (pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In Cole, J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1971 (Vol. 19, pp. 207–282). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pancultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164, 86–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002a). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002b). Is there an ingroup advantage in emotion recognition?Psychological Bulletin, 128, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 276–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In Ellyson, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–27). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Philippot, P., & Custrini, R. (1991). Social competence and nonverbal behavior. In Feldman, R. & Rime, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 329–350). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frable, D. E. S., Blackstone, T., & Scherbaum, C. (1990). Marginal and mindful deviants in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R. (Eds.), Emotion and Culture (pp. 51–87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In Dovidio, J. F. & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glanville, D. N., & Nowicki, S. (2002). Facial expression recognition and social competence among African American elementary school children: An examination of ethnic differences. Journal of Black Psychology, 28, 318–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstadt, A. G. (1985). Race, socioeconomic status, and nonverbal behavior. In Siegman, A. W. & Feldstein, S. (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 227–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & SmithLeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1997). “Subordination” and sensitivity to nonverbal cues: A study of married working women. Sex Roles, 31, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A., Halberstadt, A. G., & O'Brien, C. E. (1997). “Subordination” and nonverbal sensitivity: A study and synthesis of findings based on trait measures. Sex Roles, 37, 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebl, M. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2005). Promoting the “social” in the examination of social stigmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 156–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hess, U., Adams, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2004). Facial appearance, gender, and emotion expression. Emotion, 4, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, U., Blairy, S., & Kleck, R. E. (1997). The relationship between intensity of emotional facial expressions and observers' decoding. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, U., Senecal, S., Kirouac, G., Herrera, P., Philippot, P., & Kleck, R. E. (2000). Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self-perceptions. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 609–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facial prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14, 640–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Kaiser, S., & Wehrle, T. (2004). Facial expressions in social interactions: Beyond basic emotions. In Canamero, D. & Aylett, R. (Eds.), Advances in consciousness research: Animating expressive characters for social interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirouac, G., & Hess, U. (1999). Group membership and the decoding of nonverbal behavior. In Philippot, P., Feldman, R., & Coats, E. (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (pp. 182–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaFrance, M., Hecht, M. A., & Paluck, E. L. (2003). The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaFrance, M., & Henley, N. M. (1994). On oppressing hypotheses: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. In Radtke, H. L. & Stam, H. J. (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations theory and practice (pp. 287–311). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Leyens, J.-P., Demoulin, S., Désert, M., Vaes, J., & Philippot, P. (2002). Expressing emotions and decoding them: Ingroups and outgroups do not share the same advantages. In Mackie, D. M. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 139–151). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, A., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Nonverbal “accents”: Cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Psychological Science, 14, 373–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, D. (1989). Cultural influences on the perception of emotion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1992). American-Japanese cultural differences in the recognition of universal facial expressions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (2002). Methodological requirements to test a possible ingroup advantage in judging emotions across cultures: Comment on Elfenbein and Ambady (2002) and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Kasri, F., & Kooken, K. (1999). American-Japanese cultural differences in judgements of expression intensity and subjective experience. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigation of the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law: Special Edition on the Other-Race Effect, 7, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S., Glanville, D., & Demertzis, A. (1998). A test of the ability to recognize emotion in the facial expressions of African American adults. Journal of Black Psychology, 24, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative ingroup bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladino, M., Leyens, J., Rodriguez, R., Rodriguez, A., Gaunt, R., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Differential association of uniquely and nonuniquely human emotions with the ingroup and outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M. L. (1982). A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange. Psychological Review, 89, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pittam, J., Gallois, C., Iwawaki, S., & Kroonenberg, P. (1995). Australian and Japanese concepts of expressive behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richeson, J., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2005). Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodin, M. J. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard. Social Cognition, 5, 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagar, H. A., & Schofield, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Salvatore, J. (2005). Expecting to be the target of prejudice. Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Psychology (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Trawalter, S. (2005). Attention bias to ingroup vs. outgroup members. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vorauer, J. D. (2005). Miscommunications surrounding efforts to reach out across group boundaries. Manuscript submitted for publication.CrossRef
Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Main, K. J., & Roy, S. A. (2000). Meta-stereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats