Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-k7f5t Total loading time: 1.636 Render date: 2022-01-27T06:38:14.077Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Book contents

Chapter 9 - The Aging Foot

Forensic Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2020

Kim A. Collins
Affiliation:
LifePoint Inc, South Carolina
Roger W. Byard
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access

Summary

Forensic podiatry is concerned with the examination of the structure and function of the foot and its relationship to questioned foot impression, footwear, and gait characteristics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foot Dimensions of Soldiers: Project No T-13 – survey of foot measurements of proper fit of Army shoes. Armored Medical Research Laboratory, Fort Knox, Kentucky, USA, 1946.Google Scholar
Harris, RI, Beath, T. Army Foot Survey. An Investigation of Foot Ailments in Canadian Soldiers, No. 1574. National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada, 1949.Google Scholar
Robbins, LM. The individuality of human footprints J Forensic Sci 1978; 23(4): 778–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laskowski, GE, Kyle, VL. Barefoot impressions: a preliminary study of identification characteristics and population frequency of their morphological features. J Forensic Sci 1988; 33(2): 378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, RB. Uniqueness of bare feet and its use as a possible means of identification. Forensic Sci Int 1996; 82(1): 81–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menz, HB. Chronic foot pain in older people. Maturitas 2016; 91: 110–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plummer, E, Albert, S. Focussed assessment of foot care in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 310–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, L, Davis, H. Foot problems in the US. The 1990 National Health Interview Survey. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1993; 83: 475–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernon, DW, DiMaggio, JA. Forensic Podiatry Principles and Methods, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menz, HB. Biomechanics of the ageing foot and ankle: a mini-review. Gerontology 2015; 61(4): 381–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Gorter, KJ, Kuyvenhoven, MM, de Melker, RA. Nontraumatic foot complaints in older people. A population-based survey of risk factors, mobility, and well-being. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000; 90: 397402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staheli, LT, Chew, DE, Corbett, M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69A: 426–8.Google Scholar
Hillstrom, HJ, Song, J, Kraszewski, AP, Hafer, JF, Mootanah, R, Dufour, AB, Chow, BS, Deland, JT. Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait Posture 2013; 37: 445–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, JB, Mackintosh, S, Jones, S, Thewlis, D. Differences in foot kinematics between young and older adults during walking. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiu, MC, Wu, HC, Chang, LY, Wu, MH. Center of pressure progression characteristics under the plantar region for elderly adults. Gait Posture 2013; 37: 408–12.Google Scholar
van Hoeve, S, Leenstra, B, Willems, P, Poesze, M, Meijer, K. The effect of age and speed on foot and ankle kinematics assessed using a 4-segment foot model. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(35): e7907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, E. Finding one’s niche in the skin. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4: 499502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, CV, Zheng, YP, Cheing, GL. Epidermal thickness and biomechanical properties of plantar tissues in diabetic foot. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37(7): 1029–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuster, S, Block, MM, McVitie, E. The influence of age and sex on skin thickness, skin collagen and density. Br J Dermatol 1975; 93: 639–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoolen, M, Ryan, TJ, Bristow, I. A study of the skin of the sole of the foot using high-frequency ultrasonography and histology. Foot 2000; 10: 1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Periyasamy, R, Anand, S, Ammini, AC. The effect of aging on the hardness of foot sole skin: a preliminary study. Foot 2012; 22: 9599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavanagh, PR. Plantar soft tissue thickness during ground contact in walking. J Biomech 1999; 32: 623–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, C-C, Tsai, W-C, Chen, CP-P, Shau, Y-W, Wang, C-L, Chen, MJ-L, Chang, K-J. Effects of aging on the plantar soft tissue properties under the metatarsal heads at different impact velocities. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1423–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwan, RL, Zheng, YP, Cheing, GL. The effect of aging on the biomechanical properties of plantar soft tissues. Clin Biomech 2010; 25: 601–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, TJ. Invited review: aging and sarcopenia. J App Physiol 2003; 95: 1717–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menz, HB, Zammit, GV, Munteanu, SE, Scott, G. Plantarflexion strength of the toes: age and gender differences and evaluation of a clinical screening test. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 1103–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uritani, D, Fukumoto, T, Matsumoto, D, Shima, M. Reference values for toe grip strength among Japanese adults aged 20–79 years: a cross-sectional study. J Foot Ankle Res 2014; 7: 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, SL, Ellis, R, Heath, M, Rome, K. Ultrasonic evaluation of the abductor hallucis muscle in hallux valgus: a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nigg, BM, Fisher, V, Allinger, TL, Ronsky, JR, Engsberg, JR. Range of motion of the foot as a function of age. Foot Ankle 1992; 13: 336–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Periyasamy, R, Anand, S, Ammini, AC. The effect of aging on the hardness of foot sole skin: a preliminary study. Foot 2012; 22: 95–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, JR, Hale, WE. Prevalence of foot complaints in the elderly. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1987; 77: 308–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, LA. Prevalence of chronic podiatric conditions in the US. National Health Survey 1990. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1992; 82: 221–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menz, HB, Zammit, GV, Munteanu, SE. Plantar pressures are higher under callused regions of the foot in older people. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007; 32: 375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coughlin, MJ. Mallet toes, hammer toes, claw toes, and corns. Causes and treatment of lesser-toe deformities. Postgrad Med 1984; 75(5): 191–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirzad, K, Kiesau, CD, DeOrio, JK, Parekh, SG. Lesser toe deformities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19(8): 505–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roddy, E, Zhang, W, Doherty, M. Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 857–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menz, HB, Lord, SR. Foot pain impairs balance and functional ability in community-dwelling older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91: 222–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, USDT, Hillstrom, HJ, Li, W, Dufour, AB, Kiel, DP, Procter-Gray, E, Gagnon, MM, Hannan, MT. Factors associated with hallux valgus in a population-based study of older women and men: the MOBILIZE Boston Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, ES, Albert, SG. Diabetic foot management in the elderly. Clin Geriatric Med 2008; 24: 551–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roddy, E,Thomas, MJ, Marshall, M, Rathod, T, Myers, H, Menz, HB, Thomas, E, Peat, G. The population prevalence of symptomatic radiographic foot osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional findings from the clinical assessment study of the foot. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 156–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, M. Global control of diabetes: information for action. Lancet 2011; 378: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, ME. Gender differences in diabetes-related lower extremity amputations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(7): 1951–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruun, C, Siersma, V, Guassora, AD, Holstein, P, de Fine Olivarius, N.Amputations and foot ulcers in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and observed for 19 years. The role of age, gender and co-morbidity. Diabet Med 2013; 30: 964–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrobel, JS, Najafi, B. Diabetic foot biomechanics and gait dysfunction. J Diabet Sci Technol 2010; 4(4): 833–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavanagh, PR, Simoneau, GG, Ulbrecht, JS. Ulceration, unsteadiness, and uncertainty: the biomechanical consequences of diabetes mellitus. J Biomech 1993; 26(Suppl 1): 2340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, MJ, Minor, SD, Sahrmann, SA, Schaaf, JA, Strube, MJ. Differences in the gait characteristics of patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy compared with age-matched controls. Phys Ther 1994; 74(4): 299308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrofsky, J, Lee, S, Bweir, S. Gait characteristics in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 93(5–6): 640–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alam, U, Riley, DR, Jugdey, RS, Azmi, S, Rajbhandari, S, Malik, RA. Diabetic neuropathy and gait: a review. Diabetes Ther 2017; 8(6): 1253–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zammit, GV, Menz, HB, Munteanu, SE, Landorf, KB. Plantar pressure distribution in older people with osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux limitus/rigidus). J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1665–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, K, Hunt, MA, Ferber, R. Biomechanical deviations during level walking associated with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res 2013; 65: 1643–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Reddy, M, Gill, SS, Rochon, PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296(8): 974–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×