Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-x5mqb Total loading time: 0.391 Render date: 2021-11-29T10:00:40.685Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

12 - Gender and the United States Constitution: Equal Protection, Privacy, and Federalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Reva B. Siegel
Affiliation:
Nicholas de B. Katzenbach Professor of Law, Yale Law School
Beverley Baines
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Ruth Rubio-Marin
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla
Get access

Summary

There are no doubt thousands of pathways, direct and indirect, by which constitutions work to enforce and to unsettle the institutions, practices, and understandings that regulate social status of men and women. In this chapter, I consider a few of the more prominent ways that the United States Constitution has served to legitimate and to dismantle social arrangements that sustain inequalities between the sexes.

The U.S. Constitution prohibits government from acting in ways that deny persons within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This chapter begins with a brief account of how the Supreme Court came to read this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as a guarantee of equal citizenship for women, over a century after it was first included in the Constitution. It surveys the basic contours of equal protection doctrine, and then considers in more detail how the United States Supreme Court has applied the Equal Protection Clause to questions of sex discrimination in a variety of different practical contexts. The remainder of the essay considers two other bodies of constitutional doctrine that play an especially prominent role in shaping women's lives: privacy doctrines that protect individual decision making about reproduction from state interference, and federalism doctrines that determine the circumstances in which the United States Congress can enact laws that affect family relations.

In general, my account emphasizes description, rather than critical evaluation, of American constitutional law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Katharine T. Bartlett and Angela P. Harris, Gender and Law: Theory, Doctrine, Commentary, 2nd ed. (New York: Aspen Law & Business, 2002)
Martha Chamallas, Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory (Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Law & Business, 2003)
Catharine MacKinnon, Sex Equality (New York: Foundation Press, 2001)
Crenshaw, Kimberlé, “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics” (1989) University of Chicago Legal Forum139Google Scholar
Garrow, David J., “Abortion before and after Roe v. Wade: An Historical Perspective” (1999) 62 Albany Law Review833Google Scholar
Hunter, Nan D., “Panel VI: Fighting Gender and Sexual Orientation Harassment: The Sex Discrimination Argument in Gay Rights Cases” (2000) 9 Journal of Law and Policy397Google Scholar
Catharine Mackinnon, “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination” (1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987) 32
Olsen, Frances, “Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis” (1984) 63 Texas Law Review387Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. & Siegel, Reva B., “Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act112 Yale Law Journal (2003) 1943, 1980–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., “‘The Rule of Love’: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy” (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Wendy W., “The Equality Crisis: Some Reflections on Culture, Courts, and Feminism” (1992) 14 Women's Rights Law Reporter151Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×