Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 0.306 Render date: 2021-10-16T13:41:48.134Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

10 - Engendering the Constitution: The Spanish Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Ruth Rubio-Marin
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Seville, Spain
Beverley Baines
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Ruth Rubio-Marin
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla
Get access

Summary

The current Spanish Constitution was enacted in December 1978, marking Spain's transition to democracy after Franco's death. The Constitution expresses its commitment with a territorially decentralized rule of law-based state inspired in democratic and welfare-state principles and establishes a parliamentary monarchy. It recognizes the separation of powers and a list of fundamental rights, which, according to an explicit interpretive rule (Art. 10.2) are to be read in conformity with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other relevant international treaties and agreements that Spain has ratified.

The Constitution also foresees the creation of a new organ, the Constitutional Court, which is the ultimate guardian of the Constitution, and is not conceived as part of the ordinary judiciary. This Court has been functioning since 1981. The twelve justices that comprise it are elected for a nine-year term and are appointed by the different branches of government. Among its main attributes for our purposes are those of exercising judicial review of statutes (the ordinary judiciary is not entitled to review laws) and the protection of constitutional rights through amparo. Individuals can bring an action known as an amparo before the Constitutional Court when public authorities have violated their most fundamental rights and the ordinary judiciary has failed to redress their claims.

In few areas can we observe the transformation that Spain has undergone since 1978 better than in the changes women have experienced under the new constitutional order.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A. C. Azkárate Askasua Albéniz, Mujer y discriminación: del Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades al Tribunal Constitucional (Vitoria: Instituto Vasco de la Administración Pública, 1998)
Unzueta, M. A. Barrete, Discriminación, derecho antidiscriminatorio y acción positiva en favor de las mujeres (Madrid, 1997)
J. M. Bilbao Ubillos, La eficacia horizontal de los derechos fundamentales (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 2000)
J. M. Bilbao Ubillos and F. Rey Martínez, Veinte años de jurisprudencia sobre igualdad constitucional en la Constitución y la práctica del Derecho, in M. Aragón Reyes and J. Martínez-Simancas Sánchez, eds. (Madrid: Sopec, 1998) 243–339
Torres, J. García, “Sint ut fuerun aut non sint” Pequeña contribución jurídico-constitucional al novísimo derecho nobiliario de creación judicial (1998) 22 Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional243–289Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J. M. Martínez Pereda, “La inconstitucionalidad de la preferencia masculina en la sucesión de los títulos nobiliarios” (1991) III-41545–564 and-42565–589Google Scholar
Mujer y Constitución en España (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2000)
A. Ollero, Discriminación por razón de sexo: valores, principios y normas en la jurisprudencia constitucional española (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1999)
M. Rodríguez Piñero and M. F. Fernández López, Igualdad y Discriminación (Madrid: Tecnos, 1986)
M. F. Fernández López, “Igualdad y no discriminación por razón de sexo. Planteamiento constitucional” in J. Aparicio and A. Baylos, eds., Autoridad y democracia en la empresa (Madrid: Trotta, 1992)
F. Rey Martínez, El derecho fundamental a no ser discriminado por razón de sexo (Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 1995)
R. Rubio Marín, Mujer e Igualdad: La norma y su aplicación (tomo I: El ordenamiento constitucional; logros y posibilidades) (Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de la Mujer, 1999)
A. Ruiz Miguel, Aborto: Problemas constitucionales (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1990)

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×