Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-nshs2 Total loading time: 0.685 Render date: 2022-01-21T11:33:14.276Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Suggested Readings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Linda C. McClain
Affiliation:
Boston University
Joanna L. Grossman
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gender Equality
Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship
, pp. 431 - 436
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Kathryn, “From Autonomy to Agency: Reflections on Women's Self-Direction,” 40 William and Mary L. Rev.805 (1999).Google Scholar
Abrams, Kerry, “Immigration Law and the Regulation of Marriage,” 91 Minn. L. Rev.1625 (2007).Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, Alexander, “Citizens, Aliens, Membership and the Constitution,” 7 Const. Comment.9 (1990).Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed, “The Bill of Rights as a Constitution,” 100 Yale L. J.1131 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, Beverley, & Rubio-Marin, Ruth, The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bakht, Natasha, “Were Muslim Barbarians Really Knocking on the Gates of Ontario? The Religious Arbitration Controversy – Another Perspective,” 40th Anniv. Ed. Ottawa L. Rev.67 (2006).Google Scholar
Bell, David, & Binnie, Jon, The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bennoune, Karima, “Secularism and Human Rights: A Contextual Analysis of Headscarves, Religious Expression, and Women's Equality Under International Law,” 45 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.367 (2007).Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren, Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, “Citizenship and Work,” 27 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg.497, 500 (2001).Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, “Citizenship Denationalized,” 7 Ind. J. Global L. Stud.447 (2000).Google Scholar
Boyd, Marion, “Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion,” Ministry of the Attorney General, http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/.
Bredbenner, Candace, A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy, Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Thought, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1988.Google Scholar
Buckingham, Susan, & Lievesley, Geraldine, eds., In the Hands of Women: Paradigms of Citizenship, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2006.
Buss, Doris, & Manji, Ambreena, eds., International Law: Modern Feminist Approaches, Portland, OR: Hart, 2005.
Calavita, Kitty, “Law, Citizenship, and the Construction of (Some) Immigrant ‘Others,’30 L. & Soc. Inquiry401 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, Mary Anne, “Feminist Fundamentalism and the Baby Markets,” in Goodwin, Michele, ed., Baby Markets: Money, Morals and the Neopolitics of Choice, New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
Case, Mary Anne, “Feminist Fundamentalism on the Frontier Between Government and Family Responsibility for Children,” in Fineman, Martha Albertson and Worthington, Karen, eds., What Is Right for Children? The Competing Paradigms of Religion and Human Rights, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne, “Perfectionism and Fundamentalism in the Application of the German Abortion Laws,” in Williams, Susan H., ed., Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Rights, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne, “‘The Very Stereotype the Law Condemns’: Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law as a Quest for Perfect Proxies,” 85 Cornell L. Rev.1447, 1473 (2000).Google Scholar
Cook, Rebecca, et al., Reproductive Health and Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossman, Brenda, Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F., The Grounding of Modern Feminism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F., Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cox, Adam B., “Citizenship, Standing, and Immigration Law,” 92 Cal. L. Rev.373 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Peggy Cooper, Neglected Stories: The Constitution and the Family, New York: Hill and Wang, 1997.Google Scholar
,Division for the Advancement of Women, “Secretary-General Report on All Forms of Violence Against Women,” United Nations, http://www.un.org/.
Dubber, Markus Dirk, The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government, New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, James G., Religious Schools v. Children's Rights, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Eichner, Maxine, Family Matters: The Family-State Relationship and Our Liberal Democratic Ideals, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Fazaeli, Roja, “Contemporary Iranian Feminism: Identity, Rights and Interpretations,” 4:1 Muslim World J. Hum. Rts.1 (2007).Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency, New York: New Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition,” 20 Yale J. L. & Fem.1 (2008).Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Joan, “The Gender Dimension of U.S. Immigration Policy,” 9 Yale J. L. & Fem.23 (1997).Google Scholar
Forbath, William E., “Caste, Class and Equal Citizenship,” 98 Mich. L. Rev.1 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, “Mapping the Feminist Imagination: From Redistribution to Recognition to Representation,” 12 Constellations295 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fregoso, Rosa Linda, MeXicana Encounters: The Making of Social Identities on the Borderlands, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn, ed., Women and Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRef
Goodwin, Michele, “Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Double Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood,” 9 J. Gender, Race & Justice1 (2005).Google Scholar
Gordon, Jennifer, & Lenhardt, Robin, “Rethinking Work and Citizenship,” 55 UCLA L. Rev.1161, 1185 (2008).Google Scholar
Grabham, Emily, & Hunter, Rosemary, “Special Issue – Encountering Human Rights: Gender/Sexuality, Activism and the Promise of Law,” 16 Fem. L. Stud. (2008).Google Scholar
Grossman, Joanna L., “Job Security Without Equality: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993,” 15 Wash. U. J. L. & Pol'y17 (2004).Google Scholar
Grossman, Joanna L., “Women's Jury Service: Right of Citizenship or Privilege of Difference?,” 46 Stan. L. Rev.1115 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitman, Elizabeth, “Infertility as a Public Health Problem: Why Assisted Reproductive Technologies Are Not the Answer,” 6 Stanford L. & Pol'y Rev.89 (1995).Google ScholarPubMed
Hirschmann, Nancy J., Gender, Class and Freedom in Modern Political Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., & Liebert, Ulrike, eds., Women & Welfare: Theory and Practice in the United States and Europe, Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000.
Hobson, Barbara, & Lister, Ruth, “Citizenship,” in Hobson, Barbara et al., eds., Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, Mary, “Women's Human Rights and Islam: A Study of Three Attempts at Accommodation,” 14:1 J. Islamic Stud.101 (2003).Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan, Governing Morals: A Social History of Moral Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Irving, Helen, Gender and the Constitution: Equity and Agency in Comparative Constitutional Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandiyoti, Deniz, Women, Islam and the State, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karst, Kenneth L., Belonging to America: Equal Citizenship and the Constitution, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kay, Herma Hill, “Equality and Difference: The Case of Pregnancy,” 1 Berkeley Women's L. J.26 (1985).Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda L., No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship, New York: Hill and Wang, 1998.Google Scholar
Klausen, Jytte, & Maier, Charles S., eds., Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, New York: Palgrave, 2001.
Kuovo, Sari, “A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Approach to Women's Emancipation and Human Rights,” 15 Fem. L. Stud.37 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, Amy, “Gender and the Neoliberal States: Feminists Remake the Nation in Ecuador,” 30 Latin Am. Persp.181 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, Ruth, Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd ed., New York: New York University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Martha, “Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining Issues of Separation Assault,” 90 Mich. L. Rev.1 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Why We Lost the ERA, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H., Class, Citizenship, and Social Development: Essays by T. H. Marshall, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1964.Google Scholar
Mayeri, Serena, “Constitutional Choices: Legal Feminism and the Historical Dynamics of Change,” 92 Cal. L. Rev.755 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, Linda C., “The Domain of Civic Virtue in a Good Society: Families, Schools and Sex Equality,” 69 Fordham L. Rev.1617, 1637 (2001).Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C., The Place of Families: Fostering Capacity, Equality, and Responsibility, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “Efficiency and Social Citizenship: Challenging the Neoliberal Attack on the Welfare State,” 78 Ind. L. J.783 (2003).Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “Thinking With Wolves: Left Legal Theory After the Right's Rise,” 54 Buffalo L. Rev.1191 (2007).Google Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen, The Motherless State: Women's Political Leadership and American Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoldrick, Dominic, Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe, Oxford: Hart, 2006.Google Scholar
McSally, Martha, “Women in Combat: Is the Current Policy Obsolete?,” 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y1090 (2007).Google Scholar
Mills, Melinda, et al., “Gender Equity and Fertility Intentions in Italy and the Netherlands,” 18 Demographic Res.1 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghissi, Haideh, Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis, London: Zed Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Morris, Jenny, “Impairment and Disability: Constructing an Ethics of Care That Promotes Human Rights,” 16 Hypatia1 (Fall 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motomura, Hiroshi, Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Norton, Mary Beth, Founding Mothers and Fathers: Gendered Power and the Forming of American Society, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Ruth, ed., Voices from the Edge: Narratives About the Americans With Disabilities Act, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Okin, Susan Moller, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “Völkerrecht im Gender-Fokus,” in Zimmermann, Andreas and Giegerich, Thomas, eds., Gender und Internationales Recht, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2007.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne, The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pillard, Cornelia T. L., “Our Other Reproductive Choices: Equality in Sex Education, Contraceptive Access, and Work-Family Policy,” 56 Emory L. J.941, 957 (2007).Google Scholar
Powell, Catherine, “Human Rights at Home: A Domestic Policy Blueprint for the New Administration,” Am. Const. Soc'y L. & Pol'y (2008), available at http://www.acslaw.org.
Procida, Mary A., Married to the Empire: Gender, Politics, and Imperialism in India, 1883–1947, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Razack, Sherene H., Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims From Western Law and Politics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Reskin, Barbara F., & Hartmann, Heidi I., eds., Women's Work, Men's Work: Sex Segregation on the Job, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
Ritter, Gretchen, The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the American Constitutional Order, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Rose, Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Blanca Rodríguez, & Rubio-Marín, Ruth, “The Gender of Representation: On Democracy, Equality, and Parity,” 6 ICon287 (2008).Google Scholar
Ryan, Maura, The Ethics and Economics of Assisted Reproduction, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sadowski-Smith, Claudia, ed., Globalization on the Line: Culture, Capital, and Citizenship at U.S. Borders, New York: Palgrave, 2002.CrossRef
Sayeh, Leila P., et al., “Islam and the Treatment of Women: An Incomplete Understanding of Gradualism,” 30 Tex. Int'l L. J.311 (1995).Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M., Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M., et al., Domestic Violence and the Law: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., New York: Foundation Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki, “Life's Work,” 100 Colum. L. Rev.1881, 1888 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenbach, Sybil A., & Smith, Patricia, eds., Women and the United States Constitution: History, Interpretation, and Practice, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.
Shachar, Ayelet, Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women's Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, “Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: New Modes of Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies,” 50 McGill L. J.49 (2005).Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, “The Worth of Citizenship in an Unequal World,” 8 Theoretical Inquiries L.367 (2007).Google Scholar
Shah, Niaz, “Women's Human Rights in the Koran: An Interpretative Approach,” 28:4 Hum. Rts. Q.868 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, Making Babies, Making Families: What Matters Most in an Age of Reproductive Technologies, Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N., American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., “Equality Talk: Anti-subordination and Anti-classification Values in Constitutional Struggles Over Brown,” 117 Harv. L. Rev.1470 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers S., “The Distinctive Barriers to Gender Equality,” in Klausen, Jyette and Maier, Charles S., eds., Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara, “Crazy Jane Talks With the Bishop: Abortion in China, Germany, South Africa and International Human Rights,” 12 Tex. J. Women & L.287 (2003).Google Scholar
Stobel, Margaret, European Women and the Second British Empire, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, “A Defense of Abortion,” 1 Phil. & Pub. Aff.47 (1971).Google Scholar
Thomson, Rosemary Garland, Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan, “Care as the Work of Citizens: A Modest Proposal,” in Friedman, Marilyn, ed., Women and Citizenship, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Volpp, Leti, “Divesting Citizenship: On Asian American History and the Loss of Citizenship Through Marriage,” 52 U.C.L.A. L. Rev.405 (2005).Google Scholar
Weissman, Deborah M., “The Political Economy of Violence: Toward an Understanding of the Gender-Based Murders of Ciudad Juárez,” 30 N.C. J. of Int'l L. and Comm. Reg.795 (2005).Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan, The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability, New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
West, Robin, “Jurisprudence and Gender,” 55 U. Chi. L. Rev.1 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lynn, et al., eds., “Symposium: Disparities in Infertility Treatment,” 85:4 Fertil. Steril. (2006).CrossRef
Xizhe, Peng, “Is It Time to Change China's Population Policy?,” 2:1 China: Intl. J.135 (2004).Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×