Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:47:51.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2020

Edited by
Jonathan J. Price  and
Katell Berthelot
Jonathan J. Price
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Katell Berthelot
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Rome
Roman, Greek, Jewish and Christian Visions
 , pp. 274 - 297
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, G. 1981. Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours “optimates’’ de Ciceron. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achtemeier, P. 1996. 1 Peter. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. S. 2003. “The Evil Empire: The Qumran Eschatological War Cycle and the Origins of Jewish Opposition to Rome,” in Paul, S. M. et al. (eds.), Emanuel: Studies in Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Emanuel Tov. Leiden: Brill. 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alon, G. 1977. “Rabban Johanan B. Zakkai’s Removal to Jabneh,” in Jews, Judaism and the Classical World: Studies in Jewish history in the Times of the Second Temple and Talmud, tr. by I. Abrahams. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Magnes Press. 269–313.Google Scholar
Alonso-Núñez, J. M. 1983. “Die Abfolge der Weltreiche bei Polybios und Dionysos von Halikarnassos,” Historia 32 (4): 411–26.Google Scholar
Alonso-Núñez, J. M. 1989. “Aemilius Sura,” Latomus 48 (1): 110–19.Google Scholar
Amusin, J. D. 1977. “The Reflection of Historical Events of the First Century B.C. in Qumran Commentaries (4Q161; 4Q169; 4Q166),” Hebrew Union College Annual 48: 123–52.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2008. The Matter of the Gods. Religion and the Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2010. “The Ontology of Religious Institutions,” History of Religions 50(1): 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astin, A. E. 1967. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, K. M. T. 1959. “The Historical Setting of the Habakkuk Commentary,” Journal of Semitic Studies 4(3): 238–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, K. M. T. 1999. “On the Herodian Origin of Militant Davidic Messianism,” Journal of Biblical Literature 118(3): 435–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aune, D. 1997. Revelation. Word Biblical Commentary 52A-C. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Babut, D. 1969. Plutarque et le Stoïcisme. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Baer, Y. 1971. “Jerusalem in the Times of the Great Revolt,” Zion 36(3/4):127–190 (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Bandy, A. S. 2009. “The Layers of the Apocalypse: An Integrative Approach to Revelation’s Macrostructure,” Journal of the Study of the New Testament 31(4): 469–99.Google Scholar
Barker, M. 2000. The Revelation of Jesus Christ. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 2011. Constantine: Dynasty, Religion and Power in the Later Roman Empire. Malden, Mass. and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baronowski, D. W. 2011. Polybius and Roman Imperialism. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. C. 1993. “Chronologies of remembrance: the interpretation of Roman inscriptions,” World Archaeology 25(2): 236–47.Google Scholar
Barthèlemy, D. and Milik, J. T. 1955. “Livre Des Mistères,” in Discoveries in the Judean Desert, I: Qumran Cave I. Oxford University Press. 102–7.Google Scholar
Bauckham, R. 1993. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauckham, R. 1995. “The Messianic Interpretation of Isa. 10:34 in the Dead Sea Scrolls, 2 Baruch and the Preaching of John the Baptist,” Dead Sea Discoveries 2(2): 202–16.Google Scholar
Beale, G. K. 1999. The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1985. “Writing and Ritual. A Study of Diversity and Expansion in the Arval Acta,” Papers of the British School at Rome 40: 114–62.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1986. “Cicero on Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse,” Journal of Roman Studies 76: 33–46.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1989. “Acca Laurentia Gains a Son. Myths and Priesthood at Rome,” in MacKenzie, M. M. and Roueché, C. (eds.), Images of Authority. Papers Presented to Joyce Reynolds on the Occasion of her Seventieth Birthday. Cambridge Philological Society. 41–61.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1990. “Priesthood in the Roman Republic,” in Beard, M. and North, J. (eds.), Pagan Priests. London: Duckworth. 17–48.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1991. “Writing and Religion: Ancient Literacy and the Function of the Written Word in Roman Religion,” in Humphrey, J. H. (ed.), Literacy in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 35–58.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1994. “The Roman and the Foreign. The Cult of the “Great Mother” in Imperial Rome,” in Thomas, N. and Humphrey, C. (eds.), Shamanism, History and the State. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 164–90.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2007. “Writing and Religion,” in Johnston, S. I. (ed.), Ancient Religions. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 127–38.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2011. “Consular Power and the Roman Constitution: The Case of Imperium Reconsidered,” in Beck, H. et al. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltrán Lloris, F. 2014. “The ‘Epigraphic Habit’ in the Roman World,” in Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy. Oxford University Press. 131–48.Google Scholar
Ben Shahar, M. 2017. “The Prediction to Vespasian,” in Ilan, T. and Noam, V. (eds.), Josephus and the Rabbis. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute. 604–44.Google Scholar
Bendlin, A. 1997. “Peripheral Centres – Central Peripheries: Religious Communication in the Roman Empire,” in Cancik, H. and Rüpke, J. (eds.), Römische Reichsreligion und Provinzialreligion. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 35–68.Google Scholar
Benko, S. 1980. “Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue in Christian Interpretation,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.31.1: 646–705.Google Scholar
Benoist, S. 2005. Rome, le prince et la cité. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, J.-E. 2000. “Philosophie politique et antijudaïsme chez Cicéron,” Scripta Classica Israelica 19: 113–31.Google Scholar
Bernardi Perini, G. 1999–2000. “Virgilio, il Cristo, la Sibilla. Sulla lettura ‘messianica’ della quarta egloga,” Atti e memorie dell’Accademia Galileiana di Scienze Lettere ed Arti in Padova 112: 115–24.Google Scholar
Berrin, S. L. 2004. The Pesher Nahum Scroll from Qumran: An Exegetical Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Berrin, S. L. 2005. “Pesher Nahum, Psalms of Solomon and Pompey,” in Chazon, E. G., Dimant, M., and Clements, R. A. (eds.), Reworking the Bible: Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran: Proceedings of a Joint Symposium by the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature and the Hebrew University Institute for Advanced Studies Research Group on Qumran, 15–17 January, 2002. Leiden: Brill. 65–84.Google Scholar
Berthelot, K. 2011. “Philo’s Perception of the Roman Empire,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 42(2): 166–87.Google Scholar
Berthelot, K. 2016. “The Rabbis Write Back! L’enjeu de la ‘parenté’ entre Israël et Rome–Ésaü–Édom,” Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 234: 165–92.Google Scholar
Berthelot, K. 2019. “Philo on the Impermanence of Empires,” in Berthelot, K. and Price, J. (eds.), The Crucible of Empire, The Impact of Roman Citizenship upon Greeks, Jews and Christians, Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Culture and Religion 21. Leuven: Peeters. 1–17.Google Scholar
Berti, E. 1963. Il De re publica di Cicerone e il pensiero politico classico. Padua: CEDAM.Google Scholar
Betz, O., Hengel, M. and Haacker, K. (eds.) 1974. Josephus-Studien: Untersuchungen zu Josephus, dem antiken Judentum und dem Neuen Testament. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Betz, O., Hengel, M. and Haacker, K. 1982. Biblia Patristica: Supplément Philon d’Alexandrie. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Bickerman, E. J. 1952. “Origines Gentium,” Classical Philology 47(2): 65–81.Google Scholar
Bilde, P. 1988. Flavius Josephus between Jerusalem and Rome. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Bilde, P. 1998. “Josephus and Jewish Apocalypticism,” in Mason (ed.), 35–61.Google Scholar
Binder, G. 1968. “Eine Polemik des Porphyrios gegen die allegorische Auslegung des Alten Testaments durch die Christen,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 3: 81–95.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 2000. “Two Unidentified Senators in Josephus, A. J. 19,” Classical Quarterly 50(2): 620–23.Google Scholar
Blenkinsopp, J. 2000. Isaiah 1–39: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bogaert, P. M. 1969. L’Apocalypse Syriaque de Baruch. Paris: Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Booth, J. (ed.) 2007. Cicero on the Attack. Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. and Garnsey, P. (eds.) 2003. Lactantius: Divine Institutes. Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained. The Human Instincts that Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Breed, B., Damon, C. and Rossi, A. (eds.) 2010. Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, C. 2000. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, G. J. 1991. “The Kittim in the Qumran Pesharim,” in Alexander, L. C. A. (ed.), Images of Empire. Sheffield Academic Press. 135–59.Google Scholar
Brooke, G. J. 2015. “The Kittim and Hints of Hybridity in the Dead Sea Scrolls”, in Laban, M. and Lehtipu, O. (eds.), People under Power: Early Jewish and Christian Responses to the Roman Empire. Amsterdam University Press. 17–32.Google Scholar
Brownlee, W. H. 1979. The Midrash Pesher of Habakkuk. Missoula: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, F. F. 1965. “Josephus and Daniel,” Svenska Teologiska Institutet 4: 148–62.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1990. “Cicero inspiratus Vergilius propheta? Zur Wertung paganer Autoren bei Laktanz,” Hermes 118: 357–72.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 2002. “Laktanz und seine testimonia Veritatis,” Hermes 130: 306–15.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. W. 1993. The Chronicle of Hydatius and the Consularia Constantinopolitana: Two Contemporary Accounts of the Final Years of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1987. “Die antike Stadt als Festgemeinschaft,” in Hugger, P., Burkert, W. and Lichtenhahn, E. (eds.), Stadt und Fest. Zu Geschichte und Gegenwart europäischer Festkultur. Unterägeri: W&H Verlags. 25–44.Google Scholar
Bury, J. 1889. A History of the Later Roman Empire from Arcadius to Irene (395 AD to 800 AD). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cagnat, R. et al. (eds.) 1901–1927. Inscriptiones Graecae ad res Romanas pertinentes. Paris: Leroux (repr. 1964. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider).Google Scholar
Candou Morón, J. M. 2005. “Polybius and Plutarch on Roman Ethos,” in Scheppens, G. and Bollansée, J. (eds.), The Shadow of Polybius: Intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiography. Leuven: Peeters. 307–28.Google Scholar
Caquot, A. and Philonenko, M. (eds.) 1971. Hommages à André Dupont-Sommer. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. 2006. Spirits of the Dead: Roman Funerary Commemoration in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 2004. Cultural Politics in Polybius’s Histories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 2010. “Timaios (566),” in Worthington, I. et al. (eds.), Brill’s New Jacoby. Brill Reference Online: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-jacoby/timaios-566-a566?s.num=37&s.start=20Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 2003. Nero. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 2008. “Tiberius the Wise,” Historia 57(4): 408–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaniotis, A. et al. (eds.) 1923–. Supplementum epigraphicum Graecum. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Charles, R. H. 1913. The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, J. H. et al. 1995. The Dead Sea Scrolls: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Texts with English Translations. Vol. 2. Damascus Document, War Scroll, and Related Documents. Tübingen and Louisville: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, J. H. 2002. The Dead Sea Scrolls: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Texts with English Translations. Vol. 6B. Pesharim, Other Commentaries, and Related Documents. Tübingen and Louisville: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2008. Making Time for the Past. Local history and the polis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. 1994. A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. 1967. “Esau as Symbol in Early Medieval Thought,” in Altmann, A. (ed.), Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 19–48.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 2013. Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, A. Y. 2010. “The Second Temple and the Arts of Resistance,” in Walters, P. (ed.), From Judaism to Christianity. Leiden: Brill. 115–29.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1974a. The Sibylline Oracles of Egyptian Judaism. Missoula: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1974b. “The Place of the Fourth Sibyl in the Development of the Jewish Sibyllina,” Journal of Jewish Studies 25: 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1983. “Sibylline Oracles,” in Charlesworth, J. H. (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, Vol. 1. London: Darton, Longman & Todd. 317–472.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1984. The Apocalyptic Imagination. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 2011. “Apocalypse and Empire,” Svensk Exegetisk Aresbokj 76: 1–19.Google Scholar
Conington, J. and Nettleship, H. 1898. The Works of Virgil, Vol I: Eclogues and Georgics, 5th ed. Haverfield, F. (rev.). London: Whittaker.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember, Themes in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, A. E. (ed.) 2002. Becoming Roman, Writing Latin? Literacy and epigraphy in the Roman West. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. E. 2012. Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbell, A. 2002. “Ciceronian Invective,” in May, J. (ed.), Brill Companion to Cicero Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden: Brill. 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbier, M. 2006. Donner à Voir, Donner à Lire. Mémoire et communication dans la Rome ancienne. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. 1957. “Les exégèses chrétiennes de la quatrième églogue,” Revue des Études Anciennes 59: 294–319 = 1984. Opuscula Selecta. Paris: Études Augustiniennes. 156–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courcelle, P. 1964. Histoire littéraire des grandes invasions germaniques. 3rd ed. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. 2009. “Scanning Iulus: Prosody, Position and Politics in the Aeneid,” Vergilius 55: 3–12.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. 1994. M. Tullius Cicero. The Fragmentary Speeches. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Cristofoli, R. 2005. Costantino e l’Oratio ad Sanctorum Coetum. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. 2012. Publio Virgilio Marone: Le Bucoliche. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Dauge, Y. A. 1981. Le Barbare: Récherche sur la conception romaine de la barbarie et de la civilisation. Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
De Decker, D. 1978. “Le Discours à l’Assemblée des Saints attribué à Constantin et l’oeuvre de Lactance,” in Fontaine, J. and Perrin, M. (eds.), Lactance et son temps: Recherches actuelles. Paris: Beauchesne. 75–89.Google Scholar
De Jonge, M. 1974. “Josephus und die Zukunftserwartungen seines Volkes,” in Betz, O., Hengel, M. and Haacker, K. (eds.), Josephus-Studien: Untersuchungen zu Josephus, dem antiken Judentum und dem Neuen Testament. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. 205–19.Google Scholar
Deininger, J. 2013. “Die Tyche in der pragmatischen Geschichtsschreibung des Polybios,” in Grieb, V. and Koehn, C. (eds.), Polybios und seine Historien. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. 71–111.Google Scholar
DePalma Digeser, E. 2000. The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
DeSilva, D. 2009. Seeing Things John’s Way: The Rhetoric of the Book of Revelation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Dessau, H. 1892–1916. Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2005. Thucydides’ War Narrative: A Structural Study. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dimant, D. 2013. “4th Ezra and 2 Baruch in Light of Qumran Literature,” in Matthias, H. and Gabriele, B. (eds.), Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch: Reconstruction after the Fall. Leiden: Brill. 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, R. F. 1995. “Julius Caesar in Jupiter’s Prophecy, Aeneid, Book 1,” Classical Antiquity 14(1): 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doeve, J. W. 1977. “The Flight of Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai from Jerusalem: When and Why?” in Übersetzung und Deutung: Studien zu dem Alten Testament und seiner Umwelt Alexander Reinard Hülst gewidmet von Freunden und Kollegen. Nijkerk: Callenbach. 50–65.Google Scholar
Doignon, J. 1990. “Oracles, prophéties, ‘on-dits’ sur la chute de Rome (395–410). Les réactions de Jérôme et d’Augustin,” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 36: 141–3.Google Scholar
Domaszewski, A. von. 1892. “Dislocation des römischen Heeres im Jahre 66 n. Chr. (Josephus bell. Jud. 2, 16, 4),” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 47: 207–18.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J, Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (eds.) 2009a. Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J, Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. 2009b. “Writing Imperial Politics: The Context,” in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. 2007. Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2000. Constantine and the Bishops: the Politics of Intolerance. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. 1977. “Vergil’s Fourth Eclogue,” in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 1976. University of Liverpool. 25–99.Google Scholar
Dubourdieu, A. 1997. “Les sources du Clitumne. De l’utilisation et du classement des sources littéraires,” Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 8: 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueck, D. 2000. Strabo of Amaseia. A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duval, Y.-M. 1980. “Les douze siècles de Rome et la fin de l’Empire romain. Histoire et arithmologie,” in Colloque Histoire et historiographie, Caesarodunum 15 bis. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. 239–54.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. 1995. Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius, Hellenistic Culture and Society 16. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. R. 1996. Religion and Power: Pagans, Jews and Christians in the Greek East. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 1999. “The Constantinian Circle and the Oration to the Saints,” in Edwards, M. J., Goodman, M. and Price, S. (eds.), Apologetics in the Roman Empire. Oxford University Press. 251–75.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 2003. Constantine and Christendom. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenkrook, J. von 2008. “Sculpture, Space and the Poetics of Idolatry in Josephus’ bellum Judaicum,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 39(2): 170–91.Google Scholar
Elgvin, T. 2003. “Qumran and the Roots of the Rosh Hashanah Liturgy,” in Chazon, E. G. et al. (eds.), Liturgical Perspectives: Prayer and Poetry in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Leiden: Brill. 49–67.Google Scholar
Elgvin, T. 2006. “4QMysteriesc: A New Edition,” in Garcia Martinez, F., Steudel, A., and Tigchelaar, E. (eds.), From 4QMMT to Resurrections Melanges Qumraniens en homage à Emile Puech. Leiden: Brill. 75–85.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. 2013. “How to Rule the World: Polybius Book 6 Reconsidered,” in Gibson, B. and Harrison, T. (eds.), Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F.W. Walbank. Oxford University Press. 231–45.Google Scholar
Eshel, H. 2001. “The Kittim in the War Scroll and in the Pesharim,” in Goodblatt, D., Pinnick, A. and Schwarz, D. R. (eds.), Historical Perspectives: From the Hasmoneans to Bar Kokhba in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Leiden: Brill. 29–44.Google Scholar
Eshel, H. 2008. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Hasmonean State. Grand Rapids and Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute.Google Scholar
Esler, P. F. 1994. “The Social Function of 4 Ezra,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 53: 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. A. 2016. Pseudepigrapha (New English). accordancebible.com: www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=PSEUD-EGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. (eds.) 2013. Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauvarque, B. 1994. Fin de Rome, fin du monde? L’évolution des conceptions eschatologiques de la fin de Rome de Marc Aurèle à Anastase. Ph.D. Diss., Paris IV-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1984. “The Reconciliations of Juno,” Classical Quarterly 34 (1): 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion in Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fejfer, J. 2008. Roman Portraits in Context. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Felder, S. 2002. “What is the Fifth Sibylline Oracle?” Journal for the Study of Judaism 33(4): 363–85.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1995. “Ships of State: Aeneid V and Augustan Circus Spectacle,” Classical Antiquity 14(2): 245–65.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2010. Playing Gods: The Politics of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. and Hardy, G. (eds.) 2011. The Oxford History of Historical Writing Vol. 1: Beginnings to AD 600. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. H. 1953. “Asinius Pollio and His Jewish Interests,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 84: 73–80.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. H. 1992. “Some Observations on Rabbinic Reaction to Roman Rule in Third Century Palestine,” Hebrew Union College Annual 63: 39–81.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1977. “Le discours de Philus (Cicéron, De re publica, III, 8–31) et la philosophie de Carnéade.” Revue des Études Latines 55: 128–56.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1984. “L’archéologie du De re publica (2.2.4–37.63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon,” Journal of Roman Studies 74: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate. Ecole Française de Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. 1949. La révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste. II. Le dieu cosmique. Paris: J. Gabalda.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. 1982. “Greek Translations of Latin Literature in the Fourth Century A.D.,” Yale Classical Studies 27: 173–215.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Flusser, D. 1972. “The Four Empires in the Fourth Sibyl and in the Book of Daniel,” Israel Oriental Studies 2: 148–75.Google Scholar
Flusser, D. 2007a. “Apocalyptic Elements in the War Scroll,” in, Judaism of the Second Temple Period, Vol. I, Qumran and Apocalypticism, tr. by A. Yadin. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 140–58.Google Scholar
Flusser, D. 2007b. “The Death of the Wicked King,” in, Judaism of the Second Temple Period, Vol. I, Qumran and Apocalypticism, tr. by A. Yadin, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 159–69.Google Scholar
Flusser, D. 2007c. “The ‘Book of the Mysteries’ and the High Holy Days Liturgy,” in Judaism of the Second Temple Period, Vol. I, Qumran and Apocalypticism, tr. by A. Yadin. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 119–39.Google Scholar
Flusser, D. 2007d. “4QMMT and the Benediction against the Minim,” in Judaism of the Second Temple Period, Vol. I, Qumran and Apocalypticism, tr. by A. Yadin. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 70–118.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.) 2000. Demetrius of Phalerum. Text, Translation and Discussion. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1989. “First Thoughts on Closure: Problems and Prospects”, Materiali e Discussioni 22: 75–122.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997. “Second Thoughts on Closure,” in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Classical Closure. Princeton University Press. 3–22.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 2010. “Introduction,” in Frazier, F. and Leão, D. F. (eds.), Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque, III–XXIII. Centro de estudios clássicos e humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2014. “Recusatio as Political Theater: Horace’s Letter to Augustus,” Journal of Roman Studies 104: 105–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabba, E. 1976–1977. “L’impero romano nel discorso di Agrippa II (Joseph., B, II, 345–401),” Rivista storica dell’antichità 6–7: 189–94.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gafni, I. M. 1990. The Jews of Babylonia in the Talmudic Era: A Social and Cultural History. Jerusalem: The Zalman Shazar Center.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1988. “The Anger of Aeneas,” American Journal of Philology 109(3): 321–48.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretative Introduction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gatz, B. 1967. Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellung. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. 1902. Die Oracula Sibyllina. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1992. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Geue, T. 2013. “Princeps ‘avant la lettre’: The Foundations of Augustus in Pre-Augustan Poetry,” in Labate, M. and Rosati, G. (eds.), La costruzione del mito augusteo. Heidelberg: Winter. 49–67.Google Scholar
Geymonat, M. 2001. “Un falso cristiano della seconda metà del IV secolo (sui tempi e le motivazioni della Oratio Constantini ad Sanctorum Coetum,” Aevum Antiquum 1: 349–66.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. and Harrison, T. (eds.) 2013. Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F.W. Walbank. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 1983. Die Ordnung der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur Philosophischen und Politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De Legibus. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2010. Der Kaiser und sein Gott: Das Christentum im Denken und in der Religionspolitik Konstantins des Großen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2013. Konstantin: Oratio ad sanctorum coetum / Rede an die Versammlung der Heiligen. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Gladhill, C. W. 2012. “Gods, Caesars, and Fate in Aeneid 1 and Metamorphoses 15,” Dictynna 9: 1–17.Google Scholar
Goins, S. 1993. “Two Aspects of Virgil’s Use of Labor in the Aeneid,” Classical Journal 88(4): 375–84.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. 1969 (1953). Le système stoïcien et l’idée de temps. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Goodman, M. 1987. The Ruling Class of Roman Judaea: The Origins of the Jewish Revolt against Rome, AD 66–70. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, M. 2007. Rome and Jerusalem: The Clash of Ancient Civilizations. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. P. 1992. “Appendix 2: The Interpretation of ‘Lebanon’ and 4Q285,” in G. Vermes, “Qumran Corner: Qumran Publications,” Journal of Jewish Studies 43(1): 92–94.Google Scholar
Gradel, I. 2002. Emperor Worship and Roman Religion. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, E.-J. 2006. The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Roman Republic and Early Empire. Oxford: Archeopress.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Futures Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gros, P. 1976. Aurea Templa. Recherches sur l’architecture religieuse de Rome à l’époque d’Auguste. École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1998. “Jews, Greeks, and Romans in the Third Sibylline Oracle,” in Goodman, M. (ed.), Jews in a Graeco-Roman World. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 2011. “Polybius and Josephus on Rome,” in Pastor, J., Stern, P., and Mor, M. (eds.), Flavius Josephus, Interpretation and History. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 146. Leiden: Brill. 149–62.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 2014. “Nero in the Sibylline Oracles,” Scripta Classica Israelica 32: 87–98.Google Scholar
Guelfucci, M.-R. 2010. “Polybe, la Tύχη et la marche de l’histoire,” in Frazier, F. and Leão, D. F. (eds.), Tychè et Pronoia: la marche du monde selon Plutarque. Centro de estudios clássicos e humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra. 141–167.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, F. 1984. Philosophe et augure. Recherches sur la théorie cicéronienne de la divination. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, F. 2006. Le De diuinatione de Cicéron et les théories antiques de la divination. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Gurtner, D. M. 2009. Second Baruch: A Critical Edition of the Syriac Text with Greek and Latin Fragments, English Translation, Introduction, and Concordances. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Habitch, C. 1990. Cicero the Politician. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hadas, D. 2013. “Christians, Sibyls, and Eclogue 4,” Recherches Augustiniennes et Patristiques 37: 51–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadas-Lebel, M. 2006. Jerusalem Against Rome, tr. by R. Fréchet. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Hadas-Lebel, M. 2012. Jérusalem contre Rome. Paris: Cerf – Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Hahn, I. 1962. “Zwei dunkle Stellen in Josephus (Bellum Judaicum VI § 311 und II § 142),” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 14: 131–8.Google Scholar
Hannah, R. 2013. “Time in Written Spaces,” in Sears, G., Keegan, P. and Laurence, R. (eds.), Written Space in the Latin West 200 BC to AD 300. London & New York: Bloomsbury 83–102.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. 1973. “The Oratio ad Sanctos Attributed to the Emperor Constantine and the Oracle at Daphne,” Journal of Theological Studies 24: 505–11.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1992. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1994. “Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical Press. 59–82.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1997. “Closure in Latin Epic,” in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Classical Closure. Princeton University Press. 139–62.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2006. “Cultural and Historical Narratives in Virgil’s Eclogues and Lucretius,” in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden: Brill. 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2014. The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. New York: Tauris.Google Scholar
Harrer, G. A. 1918. “Cicero on Peace and War,” Classical Journal 14(1): 26–38.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1990. “Some Views of the Aeneid in the Twentieth Century,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford University Press. 1–20.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 2012. Régimes d’historicité: Présentisme et expériences de temps. Paris.Google Scholar
Hasel, G. F. 1979. “The Four World Empires of Daniel 2 against its Near Eastern Environment,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 12: 17–30.Google Scholar
Hay, P. J. 2017. Time, Saecularity, and the First Century BC Roman World. PhD. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Heikel, I. A. (ed.) 1902. Eusebius Pamphili, Werke. Vol. 1. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2009. “Jupiter’s Aeneid: Fama and Imperium,” Classical Quarterly 28(2): 279–327.Google Scholar
Henze, M. 2011. Jewish Apocalypticism in Late First Century Israel. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herchenroeder, L. 2010. Hellenistic Historiography and the Sciences: Practices and Concepts in Polybius’ Histories, Ph.D. Diss., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1992. “Arma in Ovid’s Fasti 2: Genre, Romulean Rome, and Augustan Ideology,” Arethusa 25(1): 113–53.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. and Beard, M. 2005. The Colosseum. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. 2014. “Renaissance and Golden Age Revisited: Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue in Medici Florence,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 76: 413–32.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. 2015. “The Golden Age Returns: Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue in the Political Panegyric of the Italian Courts,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 78: 71–95.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 2017. Votive Body Parts in Greek and Roman Religion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglebert, H. 1996a. Les Romains chrétiens face à l’histoire de Rome: histoire, christianisme et romanités en Occident dans l’Antiquité tardive (IIIe–Ve siècles). Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Inglebert, H. 1996b. Interpretatio Christiana. Les mutations des savoirs (cosmographie, géographie, ethnographie, histoire) dans l’Antiquité chrétienne (30–630 ap. J.-C.). Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Irmscher, J. 1986. “Sulle origini del concetto Romania,” in Università degli studi La Sapienza (ed.), Da Roma alla Terza Roma III. Popoli e spazio romano tra dirito et profezia. Naples: Ed. scientifiche italiane. 421–29.Google Scholar
Isaac, B. 2017. “Roma Aeterna,” in Empire and Ideology in the Graeco-Roman World. Cambridge University Press. 33–44.Google Scholar
Ison, D. J. 1984. The Constantinian Oration to the Saints: Authorship and Background. Ph.D. Diss., University of London.Google Scholar
Jal, P. 1963. La guerre civile à Rome. Étude littéraire et morale. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Japhet, S. 2003. “‘Lebanon’ in the Transition from Derash to Peshat: Sources, Etymology and Meaning (with Special Attention to the Song of Songs),” in Paul, S. M. et al. (eds.), Emanuel: Studies in Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Emanuel Tov. Leiden: Brill. 707–24.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History, Times, Names, and Places. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, K. R. 2011. Jewish Reactions to the Destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kaden, D. A. 2011. “Flavius Josephus and the ‘gentes devictae’ in Roman Imperial Discourse: Hybridity, Mimicry, and Irony in the Agrippa II Speech (Judean War 2.345–402),” Journal for the Study of Judaism 42 (4–5): 481–507.Google Scholar
Kalmin, R. 2008. “Sasanian Persian Persecution of the Jews: A Reconsideration of the Evidence,” in Shaked, S. and Netzer, A. (eds.), Irano-Judaica: Studies Relating to Jewish Contacts with Persian Culture throughout the Ages, Vol. VI. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute. 87–122.Google Scholar
Kalmin, R. and Schwartz, D. R. (eds.) 2003. Jewish Culture and Society Under the Christian Roman Empire. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Kany Turpin, J. 2006. Cicéron, De la divination. Paris: Garnier Flammarion.Google Scholar
Keegan, P. 2014. Roles for Men and Women in Roman Epigraphic Culture and Beyond: Gender, Social Identity and Cultural Practice in Private Latin Inscriptions and the Literary Record. Oxford: Archeopress.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2007. “How to End an Orally-Derived Epic Poem,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 137(2): 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimelman, R. 2005. “Blessing Formulae and Divine Sovereignty in Rabbinic Liturgy,” in Langer, R. and Fine, S. (ed.), Liturgy in the Life of the Synagogue: Studies in the History of Jewish Prayer. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Kister, M. 1998. “Legends of the Destruction of the Second Temple in Avot De-Rabbi Natan,” Tarbiz 67(4): 484–529 (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Kister, M. 2004. “Wisdom Literature and its Relation to Other Genres: From Ben Sira to Mysteries,” in Collins, J. J. et al. (eds.), Sapiential Perspectives: Wisdom Literature in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Leiden: Brill. 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kister, M. 2009. “Wisdom Literature at Qumran,” in The Qumran Scrolls and Their World, Vol. I. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute, 2009. 299–319.Google Scholar
Klawans, J. 2012. Josephus and the Theologies of Ancient Judaism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 2013. The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, tr. K. Tribe. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kowalski, B. 2004. Die Rezeption des Propheten Ezekiel in der Offenbarung des Johannes. Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. 1994. “‘No Second Troy’: Topoi and Refoundation in Livy, Book V,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 124: 267–89.Google Scholar
Krauss, S. 1947. Persia and Rome in the Talmud and the Midrashim. Jerusalem: Mosad Harav Kook (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Kraybill, J. N. 2010. Apocalypse and Allegiance: Worship, Politics, and Devotion in the Book of Revelation. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.Google Scholar
Kubitschek, W. and Ritterling, E. 1924. “Legio,” in Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, II.2. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1918. “Das Akrostichon Ἰησοῦς Χρειστὸς Θεοῦ Υἱὸς Σωτήρ Σταυρός,” Sokrates 6: 99–105.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1920. “Vergils vierte Ekloge in Kaiser Konstantins Rede an die Heilige Versammlung,” Sokrates 8: 90–96.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1936a. “Der griechische Übersetzer von Vergils vierter Ekloge in Kaiser Konstantins Rede an die Versammlung der Heiligen,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 35: 97–100.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1936b. “Kaiser Konstantin und die Sibylle,” Theological Quarterly 117: 11–26.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1937. “Die griechische Übersetzung der vierten Ekloge Vergils,” Mnemosyne, Ser. 3, (5): 283–88.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1950. “Zu Kaiser Konstantins Rede an die Versammlung der Heiligen,” Theological Quarterly 130: 145–65.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1952. “Kaiser Konstantin und die Erythraische Sibylle,” Zeitschrift für Religions - und Geistesgeschichte 4: 42–57.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1989. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Langer, R. 2012. Cursing the Christians?: A History of the Birkat HaMinim. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lanieri, A. (ed.) 2011. The Western Time of Ancient History: Historiographical Encounters with the Greek and Roman Pasts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lanieri, A. (ed.) 2016. Knowing Future Time in and Through Greek Historiography. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lapin, H. 2012. Rabbis as Romans: The Rabbinic Movement in Palestine, 100–400 CE. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, R. and Smith, C. 1995–6. “Ritual, time and power in ancient Rome,” Accordia Research Papers 6: 133–52.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, J. Z. 2004 (1933–1935). Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael: A Critical Edition, Based on the Manuscripts and Early Editions with an English Translation, Introduction, and Notes. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. 1978. “Nero Redivivus,” Fides et Historia 11: 54–66.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1972. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Levick, B. 1999. Vespasian. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levine, C. 2015. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 1984. “La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres II et IV du De finibus.” Revue des Études Latines 62: 111–27.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2007. “De la critique de la sympathie à la volonté: Cicéron, De fato, 9–11,” Lexis 25: 17–35.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2012. “Philosophical Life versus Political Life: An Impossible Choice for Cicero?,” in Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. 58–79.Google Scholar
Liénard, P. and Boyer, P. 2006. “Whence Collective Rituals? A Cultural Selection Model of Ritualized Behavior,” American Anthropologist 108(4): 814–27.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 2007. The Sibylline Oracles. With Introduction, Translation, und Commentary on the First and Second Books. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, T. H. 2000. “Kittim,” in Schiffman, L. H., and VanderKam, J. C. (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press. 469–71.Google Scholar
Luke, T. 2014. Ushering in a New Republic: Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century BCE. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
MacConnell, S. 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. 1998. Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustine. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1967. Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1976. Roman Government’s Response to Crisis, A.D. 235–237. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1982. “The Epigraphic Habit in the Roman Empire,” American Journal of Philology 103: 233–46.Google Scholar
Mancini, A. 1894. “La pretesa Oratio Constantini ad sanctorum coetum.” Studi Storici 3: 92–117, 207–27.Google Scholar
Mankin, D. 1995. Horace Epodes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maraval, P. (ed.) 2010. Constantin le Grand: Lettres et discours. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Marinčič, M. 2001. “Der Weltaltermythos in Catulls Peleus-Epos (c. 64, der kleine Herakles Theokrit id. 24 und der römische ‘Messianismus’ Vergils),” Hermes 129(4): 484–504.Google Scholar
Marinčič, M. 2002. “Roman Archaeology in Vergil’s Arcadia (Vergil Eclogue 4; Aeneid 8; Livy 1.7),” in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 143–61.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2001. Greek Historians. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, S. 1994. “Josephus, Daniel and the Flavian House,” in Parente, F. and Sievers, J. (eds.), Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in Memory of Morton Smith. Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill. 161–91.Google Scholar
Mason, S. 1998. Understanding Josephus: Seven Perspectives. Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, J. M. 2002. Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar
Meijer, F. 2004. Emperors Don’t Die in Bed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mendels, D. 1981. “The Five Empires: A Note on a Propagandistic Topos,” The American Journal of Philology 102(3): 330–7.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. 1990. “Explaining the Epigraphic Habit in the Roman Empire: The Evidence of Epitaphs,” Journal of Roman Studies 80: 74–96.Google Scholar
Michel, A. 1960. Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron. Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l’art de persuader. Paris: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. 1995. Livy. Reconstruction Early Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 2009. Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miltsios, N. 2013. The Shaping of Narrative in Polybius. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. N. 1991. Cicero the Senior Statesman. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell-Boyask, R. 1996. “Sine Fine: Vergil’s Masterplot,” American Journal of Philology 117(2): 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moatti, C. 1997. La raison de Rome. Paris: Seuil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moatti, C. 1998. La mémoire perdue: recherches sur l’administration romaine. École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Moehring, H. R. 1984. “Joseph ben Matthia and Flavius Josephus: The Jewish Prophet and Roman Historian,” in Haase, W. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Vol. II, 21.2. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. 864–944.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1977a. “Athens in the Third Century BC and the Discovery of Rome in the Histories of Timaeus of Tauromenium,” in Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. 37–66.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1977b. “Time in Ancient Historiography,” in Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. 179–204.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1980. “Daniele e la teoria greca della successione degli imperi,” Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche. Rendiconti XXXV: 157–62 = 1984. Settimo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e letteratura. 297–304.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1982. “The Origins of Universal History,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, 12(2): 533–60.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1984. “The Origins of Universal History,” in Settimo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e letteratura. 77–103.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. et al. (eds.) 1853–. Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2005. “Freedmen and Decurions: Epitaphs and Social History in Imperial Italy,” Journal of Roman Studies 95: 38–63.Google Scholar
Munnich, O. 2011. “La fugacité de la vie humaine (De Josepho §127–147): la place des motifs traditionnels dans l’élaboration de la pensée philonienne,” in Inowlocki, S. and Decharneux, B. (eds.), Philon d’Alexandrie: un penseur à l’intersection des cultures gréco-romaine, orientale, juive et chrétienne. Turnhout: Brepols. 163–83.Google Scholar
Muntz, C. E. 2017. Diodorus Siculus and the World of the Late Roman Republic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, F. J. 1985. The Structure and Meaning of Second Baruch. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Naijman, H. 2014. Losing the Temple and Recovering the Future: An Analysis of 4 Ezra. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiweld, R. 2016. “The Use of Rabbinic Traditions about Rome in the Babylonian Talmud,” Revue de l’Histoire des Religions, 233 (2): 255–85.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 2009. Cicerone, la parola e la politica. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, E. 2005. “L’étranger barbare à Rome: essai d’analyse sémique.” L’Antiquité classique 74: 119–35.Google Scholar
Neusner, J. 2008. Persia and Rome in Classical Judaism. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 1995. Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. 2016. Cicero’s Skepticism and His Recovery of Political Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1988. L’inventaire du monde. Géographie et politique aux origins de l’Empire. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. 2001. Philo on Jewish Identity and Culture. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Nikiprowetzky, V. 1970. La Troisième Sibylle. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Nikiprowetzky, V. 1971. “La mort d’Éleazar fils de Jaïre et les courant apologétiques dans le De Bello Judaico de Flavius Josèphe,” in Caquot, A. and Philonenko, M. (eds.), Hommages à André Dupont-Sommer. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve. 461–90.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1978. “Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue: Easterners and Westerners,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 25(1): 59–78. = 1995. in S. J. Harrison (ed.), Collected Papers on Latin Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 47–75.Google Scholar
Nitzan, B. 1986. Pesher Habakkuk: A Scroll from the Wilderness of Judaea (1QpHab). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. 1970. A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. 1990. Death and Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. 1996. True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. 1953. The Ruling Power: A Study of the Roman Empire in the Second Century after Christ through the Roman Oration of Aelius Aristides. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2015. “Breviarium Totius Imperii: the background of Appian’s Roman History,” in Welch, K. (ed.), Appian’s Roman History: Empire and Civil War. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 23–44.Google Scholar
Oswalt, J. N. 1986. The Book of Isaiah: 1–39. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. E. 2005. Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. 2017. “Sowing the Seeds of War: The Aeneid’s Prehistory of Interpretive Contestation and Appropriation,” Classical World 111(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
Parente, F. and Sievers, J. (eds.) 1994. Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in Memory of Morton Smith. Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Parke, H. W. 1988. Sibyls and Sibylline Prophecy in Classical Antiquity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. 1987. The Greek Historians of the West: Timaeus and His Predecessors. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Pédech, P. 1964. La méthode historique de Polybe. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. 2010. “Hellenized Romans and Barbarized Greeks. Reading the End of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitates Romanae,” Journal of Roman Studies 100: 32–53.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2010. “’Learning from that violent schoolmaster’: Thucydidean Intertextuality and Some Greek Views of Roman Civil War,” in Breed, B., Damon, C. and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars. Oxford University Press. 105–18.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2016. “Preparing for Posterity: Dionysius and Polybius,” in Lanieri, A. (ed.), The Western Time of Ancient History: Historiographical Encounters with the Greek and Roman Pasts. Cambridge University Press. 155–73.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. 2002. “The Golden Age and its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil,” Vergilius 48: 3–39.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Petzold, K.-E. 1969. Studien zur Methode des Polybios und zu ihrer historischen Auswertung. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Pfättisch, J. M. 1908. Die Rede Konstantins des Grossen an die Versammlung der Heiligen auf ihre Echtheit untersucht. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Pfättisch, J. M. 1912–13. Die vierte Ekloge Vergils in der Rede Konstantins an die Versammlung der Heiligen. Programm des Kgl. Gymnasiums im Benediktinerkloster Ettal.Google Scholar
Pfättisch, J. M. 1913. “Die Rede an die Versammlung der Heiligen,” in Des Eusebius von Cäsarea ausgewählte Schriften. Munich: Kösel. 191–272.Google Scholar
Picard, C. 1956. “Néron et le blé d’Afrique”, Les Cahiers de Tunisie 4: 163–73. = Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 100–10: 68–71.Google Scholar
Piganiol, A. 1964. Le sac de Rome. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. 2016. “Future’s Bright? Looking Forward in Appian,” in Lanieri, A. (ed.), The Western Time of Ancient History: Historiographical Encounters with the Greek and Roman Pasts. Cambridge University Press. 281–92.Google Scholar
Pizzani, U. 1993. “Costantino e l’Oratio ad Sanctorum Coetum,” in Bonamente, G. and Fusco, F. (eds.), Costantino il Grande dall’Antichità all’Umanesimo, Vol. 2. Università degli studi di Macerata. 791–822.Google Scholar
Portier-Young, A. E. 2011. Apocalypse Against Empire: Theologies of Resistance in Early Judaism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Portier-Young, A. E. 2014. “Jewish Apocalyptic Literature as Resistance Literature,” in Collins, J. J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Apocalyptic Literature. Oxford University Press. 145–62.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. 1990. Prophecy and History in the Crisis of the Roman Empire: A Historical Commentary on the Thirteenth Sibylline Oracle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 1994. “The Rector rei publicae of Cicero’s De re publica,” Scripta Classica Israelica 13: 19–29.Google Scholar
Price, J. J. 2001. Thucydides and the Internal War. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, J. J. 2005. “The Provincial Historian in Rome,” in Sievers, J. and Lembi, G. (eds.),Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and Beyond. Leiden: Brill. 101–18.Google Scholar
Price, J. J. 2011. “Josephus,” in Feldherr, A. and Hardy, G. (eds.), The Oxford History of Historical Writing Vol. 1: Beginnings to AD 600. Oxford University Press. 219–43.Google Scholar
Price, J. J. 2015. “Thucydidean Stasis and Roman Empire in Appian’s Interpretation of History,” in Welch, K. (ed.), Appian’s Roman History: Empire and Civil War. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 45–63.Google Scholar
Prococo, S. (ed.) 1990. Eucherio di Lione, Il rifiuto del mondo. Florence: Nardini.Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rajak, T. 1983. Josephus, the Historian and his Society. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Rajak, T. 1991. “Friends, Romans, Subjects: Agrippa II’s Speech in Josephus’s Jewish War,” in Alexander, L. (ed.), Images of Empire. Sheffield Academic Press. 122–34.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 2008. The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century BC to the Second Century AD. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riguzzi, G. 2006. “Is the Babylon of Revelation Rome or Jerusalem?” Biblica 87: 371–386.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) 1997. Classical Closure. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, B. S. 1980. “Constantine’s Pagan Vision,” Byzantion 50: 259–78.Google Scholar
Roduit, A. 2003. “Le discours d’Agrippa II dans La Guerre Juive de Flavius Josèphe,” Revue des Études Juives 162(3–4): 365–402.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, E. S. 1982. “La-Milon ha-Talmudi,” in Shaked, S. (ed.), Irano-Judaica: Studies Relating to Jewish Contacts with Persian Culture throughout the Ages, Vol. I. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute. 38–134.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, E. S. 1987. “The History of the Text and Problems of Redaction in the Study of the Babylonian Talmud,” Tarbiz 57: 1–36 (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Rosen-Zvi, I. 2017. “Is the Mishnah a Roman Composition?” in Hayes, Ch., Novick, Z. and Bar-Asher Segal, M. (eds.), The Faces of Torah. Studies in the Texts and Contexts of Ancient Judaism in Honor of Steven Fraade. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 487–508.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. F. 2000. “The Tears of Marcellus: History of a Literary Motif in Livy,” Greece & Rome 47(2): 56–66.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1904. “Geschichte der Staatspacht in der römischen Kaiserzeit bis Diokletian,” Philologus. Supplement 9: 329–512.Google Scholar
Runnalls, D. 1997. “The Rhetoric of Josephus,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 30 B.C.–A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill. 737–54.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1995. Kalender und Öffentlichkeit. Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2004. “Acta aut agenda. Relations of Script and Performance,” in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome held at Stanford University in February 2002. Stuttgart: F. Steiner. 23–43.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2005. Fasti Sacerdotum: Die Mitglieder der Priesterschaften und das sakrale Funktionspersonal römischer, griechischer und jüdisch-christlicher Kulte in der Stadt Rom von 300 v. Chr. bis 499 n. Chr. 3 Vols. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. P. 1992. Judaism: Practice and Belief, 63 BCE – 66 CE. London and Philadelphia: Trinity Press.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2013. Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saulnier, C. 1991. “Flavius Josèphe et la propagande flavienne II,” Revue biblique 98: 199–221.Google Scholar
Sayler, G. B. 1984. Have the Promises Failed? A Literary Analysis of 2 Baruch. Chico, CA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Schäfer, P. 1979. “Die Flucht Johanan b. Zakkais aus Jerusalem und die Gründung des ‘Lehrhauses’ Jabne,” in Haase, W. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Vol. 2, 19.2. Berlin: De Gruyter. 43–101.Google Scholar
Schalit, A. 1975. “Nevuoteihem shel Yosef Ben Matityahu ve-Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai Al Aliyat Aspasianus la-Shilton,” in Lieberman, S. and Hyman, A. (eds.), Salo Wittmayer Baron Jubilee Volume: On the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday. Jerusalem: American Academy of Jewish Research. 397–432 (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1975. Les frères Arvales: Recrutement et origine sociale sous les empereurs julio-claudiens. Paris: Presse Universitaires de la France.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1985. “Sacrifice et banquet à Rome,” Melanges de l’École française à Rome 97 (1): 193–206.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1990. Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1995. “Graeco ritu: A Typically Roman Way of Honoring the Gods,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 15–21.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1996. “Pline le jeune et les sanctuaires d’Italie,” in Chastagnol, A., Demougin, S. and Lepelley, C. (eds.), Splendidissima Civitas. Études d’histoire romaine en hommage à François Jacques. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne. 241–58.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1998. Recherches archéologiques à la Magliana. Commentarii fratrum arvalium qui supersunt. Les copies épigraphiques des protocoles annuels de la confrérie arvale (21 av.-304 ap. J.-C.). École française de Rome / Soprintendenza archeologia di Roma.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 2003. “Hierarchy and Structure in Roman Polytheism: Roman Methods of Conceiving Action,” in Ando, C. (ed.), Roman Religion. Edinburgh University Press. 164–89 = Original, 1999. “Hiérarchie et structure dans le polythéisme romain: façons romaines de penser l’action,” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 1: 184–203.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 2005. Quand croire, c’est faire: Les rites sacrificiels des Romains. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Schelkle, K. H. 1938. Virgil in der Deutung Augustins. Stuttgart and Berlin: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Schiffman, L. 1997. “301. 4Qmysteriesc?” in Discoveries in the Judean Desert, Vol. 20: Qumran Cave 4 XV: Sapiential Texts, Pt. I, 113–23. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schnegg-Köhler, B. 2002. Die augusteischen Säkularspiele, vol. 4. Munich & Leipzig: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Schneider, M. 2013. Cicero Haruspex. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1986. “Cicero for and against Divination,” Journal of Roman Studies 76: 47–65.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1995. “Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica”, in Powell, J. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schremer, A. 2010. Brothers Estranged: Heresy, Christianity, and Jewish Identity in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, B. 2009. Conquering the World: The War Scroll (1QM) Reconsidered. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schultze, C. 1986. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his Audience,” in Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, Cambridge University Press. 121–41.Google Scholar
Schultze, V. 1894. “Quellenuntersuchungen zur Vita Constantini des Eusebius,” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 14: 503–55.Google Scholar
Schürer, E. 1986. The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, Vol. III.1. Edinburgh: Clark.Google Scholar
Schürer, E. 1987. The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, Vol. III.2. Edinburgh: Clark.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. 2001. Imperialism and Jewish Society, 200 BCE to 640 CE. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H. 1960. “Scipio Aemilianus and Roman Politics,” Journal of Roman Studies 50: 59–74.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 2013. “Polybius’ distortions of the Roman “constitution”: a simpl(istic) explanation,” in Gibson, B. and Harrison, T. (eds.). Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F.W. Walbank. Oxford University Press. 247–54.Google Scholar
Sears, G., Keegan, P. and Laurence, R. (eds.) 2013. Written Space in the Latin West 200 BC to AD 300. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sellew, P. 1989. “Achilles or Christ? Porphyry and Didymus in Debate over Allegorical Interpretation,” Harvard Theological Review 82(1): 79–100.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1977. Cicero Epistulae ad Familiares. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharon, N. 2016. “The Kittim and the Roman Conquest in the Qumran Scrolls,” Meghillot 11: 357–388 (in Heb.).Google Scholar
Sharples, R. 1986. “Cicero’s Republic and Greek Political Theory”, Polis 5(2): 30–50.Google Scholar
Sievers, J. and Lembi, G. (eds.) 2005. Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and Beyond. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1988. “Simulacra Gentium: The Ethne from the Sebasteion at Aphrodisias,” Journal of Roman Studies 78: 50–77.Google Scholar
Spilsbury, P. 2002. “Josephus on the Burning of the Temple, the Flavian Triumph, and the Providence of God,” Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 41: 306–27.Google Scholar
Spilsbury, P. 2003. “Flavius Josephus on the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire,” Journal of Theological Studies 54: 1–24.Google Scholar
Spilsbury, P. 2005. “Reading the Bible in Rome: Josephus and the Constraints of Empire,” in Sievers, J. and Lembi, G. (eds.), Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and Beyond. Leiden: Brill. 209–27.Google Scholar
Starr, R. 2009. “Annos undeviginti natus: Augustus and Romulus in Res Gestae 1.1,” Historia 58(3): 367–69.Google Scholar
Stegemann, H. 1998. The Library of Qumran: On the Essenes Qumran, John the Baptist, and Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Stemberger, G. 1983. Die römische Herrschaft im Urteil der Juden. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Šterbenc Erker, D. 2013. Religiöse Rollen römischer Frauen in “griechischen” Ritualen. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. 1992. Historiography and Self-Definition: Josephos, Luke-Acts, and Apologetic Historiography. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Stern, M. 1980. Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism. Vol. 2. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Stone, M. E. 1990. Fourth Ezra: A Commentary on the Fourth Book of Ezra. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. A. 1941. “Cicero and Gloria,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 72: 382–91.Google Scholar
Swain, J. W. 1940. “The Theory of the Four Monarchies: Opposition History under the Roman Empire,” Classical Philology 35: 1–21.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1989. “Plutarch: Chance, Providence, and History,” American Journal of Philology 110(2): 272–302.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1980. Some Arval Brethren. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Teeter, A. 2012. “Isaiah and the King of As/Syria in Daniel’s Final Vision: On the Rhetoric of Inner-Scriptural Allusion and the Hermeneutics of ‘Mantological Exegesis’,” in Mason, E. F. et al. (eds.), A Teacher for All Generations: Essays in Honor of James C. VanderKam, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill. 169–99.Google Scholar
Thélamon, F. 1981. Païens et chrétiens au IVe siècle: l’apport de l’Histoire ecclésiastique de Rufin d’Aquilée. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Thérond, B. 1981. “Les Flaviens dans la Guerre Juifs de Flavius Josèphe.” Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 7: 235–45.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C. and Macchia, F. D. 2016. Revelation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thraede, K. 1966. “Euhemerismus,” Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 6: 877–89.Google Scholar
Tigchelaar, E. 2003. “Notes on the Reading of the DJD Editions of 1Q and 4QMysteries,” Revue de Qumrân 21(1): 99–107.Google Scholar
Townsend, J. T. 2003. “Midrash Tanhuma.” Recension, S. Buber (ed. and tr.), Vol. 3. Numbers and Deuteronomy. Jersey City, NJ: Ktav.Google Scholar
Trimble, G. 2013. “Catullus 64 and the Prophetic Voice in Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue,” in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press. 263–77.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. 1989. “The False Neros of the First Century,” in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and History V. Bruxelles: Latomus. 364–404.Google Scholar
Urbach, E. E. 1964. “The Laws Regarding Slavery as a Source for Social History of the Period of the Second Temple, the Mishnah and Talmud,” in Weiss, J. G. (ed.), Papers of the Institute of Jewish Studies London, Vol. 1. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press. 1–94.Google Scholar
Vermès, G. 1973. Scripture and Tradition in Judaism: Haggadic Studies. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vermès, G. 1992. “The Qumran Corner: Qumran Publications,” Journal of Jewish Studies 43(1): 85–90.Google Scholar
Vermès, G. 2007. “Historiographical Elements in the Qumran Writings: A Synopsis of the Textual Evidence,” Journal of Jewish Studies 58(1): 121–39.Google Scholar
Vermeylen, J. 1989. “L’unité du livre d’Isaïe,” in Vermeylen, J. (ed.), Le livre d’Isaïe: Les oracles et leurs relecteurs unité et complexité de l’ouvrage. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1983. “’Titulus Praelatus’: offrande, solemnisation et publicité dans les ex-voto greco-romains,” Revue Archéologique: 281–300.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 2005. “La prise de Rome en 410 et les grandes invasions,” in L’empire gréco-romain. Paris: Seuil. 713–47.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 2010. When Our World Became Christian, 312–394. tr. by J. Lloyd. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2012. The Hills of Rome: Signature of an Eternal City. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1957–79. A Historical Commentary on Polybius, 3 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1972. Polybius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1974. “Polybius between Greece and Rome,” in Gabba, E. (ed.), Polybe: Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique de la Fondation Hardt 20. Geneva: Librairie Droz. 1–38.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1998. “A Greek Looks at Rome: Polybius VI Revisited,” Scripta Classica Israelica 17: 45–59. = 2002. in Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World. 277–92.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 2002. Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World: Essays and Reflections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982. “The Golden Age and Sin in Augustan Ideology,” Past & Present 95: 19–36.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1987. “Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti,” in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, Mary (eds.), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol Classical Press. 221–30.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. (tr.) 2010. Polybius, The Histories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, L. 2003. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinfeld, M. 1997. “Publications”, Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 11: 349–60.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. 1971. Divus Julius. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weissenberger, M. 2002. “Das Imperium Romanum in den Proömien dreier Griechischer Historiker: Polybios, Dionysios von Halikarnassos und Appian,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 145(3–4): 262–81.Google Scholar
Widengren, G. 1963. “The Status of the Jews in the Sassanian Empire,” Iranica Antiqua 1: 117–62.Google Scholar
Wiesehöfer, J. 2013. “Polybios und die Entstehung des römischen Weltreichschemas,” in Grieb, V. and Koehn, C. (eds.), Polybios und seine Historien. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. 59–69.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. 2005. Caligula. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. 2002. Euhemeros von Messene: Leben, Werk und Nachwirkung. Munich and Leipzig: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974. “Legendary Genealogies in Late Republican Rome,” Greece & Rome 21(2): 153–64.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1991. Death of an Emperor: Flavius Josephus. University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. 1979. Cicero Imperator. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1983. “Zwei Beispiele frühchristlicher Vergilrezeption: Polemik (Lact. Div. inst. 5.10) und Usurpation (Or. Const. 1931),” in Pöschl, V. (ed.), 2000 Jahre Vergil: Ein Symposium. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 63–86.Google Scholar
Wolf, R. 2015. The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. 2007. Rutilius Numantianus: sur son retour. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1996. “Monumental Writing and the Expansion of Roman Society,” Journal of Roman Studies 86: 22–39.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 2001. “Inventing Empire in Ancient Rome,” in Alcock, S. E. et al. (eds.), Empires: Perspectives from Archaeology and History. Cambridge University Press. 311–22.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 2006. Et tu, Brute?: the Murder of Caesar and Political Assassination. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Yadin, Y. 1962. The Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light against the Sons of Darkness. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yerushalmi, Y. H. 1989. Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory. New York: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Zago, G. 2012. Sapienza filosofica e cultura materiale: Posidonio e le altre fonti dell’ Epistola 90 di Seneca. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. M. and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) 2008. The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Jonathan J. Price, Tel-Aviv University, Katell Berthelot, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: The Future of Rome
  • Online publication: 24 September 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860000.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Jonathan J. Price, Tel-Aviv University, Katell Berthelot, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: The Future of Rome
  • Online publication: 24 September 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860000.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Jonathan J. Price, Tel-Aviv University, Katell Berthelot, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: The Future of Rome
  • Online publication: 24 September 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860000.016
Available formats
×