Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-n7x5d Total loading time: 0.641 Render date: 2021-11-30T19:06:41.872Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2019

Omar Farahat
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamov, Binyamin. “Necessary Knowledge in Islamic Theology.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20(1) (1993): 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamov, Binyamin. Islamic Theology: Traditionalism and Rationalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Abū l-Baqāʾ, Ayyūb b. Musā al-Ḥusaynī. al-Kulliyyāt: muʿjam fī l-muṣṭalaḥạ̄t wa l-furūq al-lughawīyya. Darwīsh, ʿAdnān and al-Maṣrī, Muḥammad, eds. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1992.Google Scholar
Abū Yaʿlā al-Farrāʾ, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥusayn. al-ʿUdda fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Sīr al-Mubārakī, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī, ed. 5 vols. Riyadh: Jāmiʿat al-Imām Muḥammad b. Saʿud al-Islāmiyya, 1990.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. “A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness,” in Outka, G. and Reeder, J. R., eds. Religion and Morality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Ahmad Atif. Structural Interrelations of Theory and Practice in Islamic Law: A Study of Six Works of Medieval Islamic Jurisprudence. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
al-Aḥmadnagarī, ʿAbd al-Nabī ʿAbd al-Rasūl. Jāmiʿ ul-ʿulūm: al-mulaqqab bi-dustūr ul-ʿulamāʾfī-ṣṭilāḥāt il-ʿulūm wa l-funūn. al-Dīn al-Ḥaydarabādī, Quṭb, ed. Haidarabad: Dāʾirat al-maʿārif al-niẓāmīyya, 1911.Google Scholar
ʿAjam, Rafīq. Mawsūʿat muṣṭalaḥāt uṣūl al-fiqh ʿinda l-Muslimīn. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān, Nāshirūn, 1998.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
al-Āmidī, ʿAlī b. Abī ʿAlī. al-Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-aḥkām. al-ʿAjūz, Ibrahīm, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2005.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33(124) (1958): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Sullivan, Daniel J., ed. vol. 1. Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De Anima. Hicks, Robert Drew, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907.Google Scholar
al-Asadābādī, ʿAbd al-Jabbār. al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa l-ʿadl. Ḥusayn, Ṭāhā, ed. 20 vols. Cairo: Wizārat al-Thaqāfa wa l-Irshād al-Qawmī, n.d. [196–].Google Scholar
Attar, Mariam. Islamic Ethics: Divine Command Theory in Arabo-Islamic Thought. London: Routledge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. Moral Value and Human Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Michael W. “Divine Command Theory,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/divine-c/.
Baggett, David, and Walls, Jerry L.. Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Bāqillānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib. al-Insāf fīmā yajibu iʿtiqādihi wa-lā yujawwazu l-jahli bihi. Cairo: Maktabat Nashr al-Thaqāfa l-Islāmiyya, 1950.Google Scholar
al-Bāqillānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib. Kitāb al-Tamhīd. McCarthy, Richard Joseph, ed. Beirut: Al-Maktaba al-Sharqiyya, 1957.Google Scholar
al-Bāqillānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib. al-Taqrīb wa l-Irshād “al-Ṣaghīr.” Abū Zunayd, ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd b. ʿAlī, ed. 2nd edn, 3 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1998.Google Scholar
al-Baṣrī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī. Kitāb al-Muʿtamad fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Bakr, Maḥammad and Ḥanafī, Ḥasan, eds. 2 vols. Damascus: al-Maʿhad al-ʿIlmī al-Faransī lil-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyya bi-Dimashq, 1964.Google Scholar
al-Bayḍāwī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar. Nature, Man and God in Medieval Islam: Abd Allah Baydawi’s Text, Tawali Al-Anwar Min Matali Al-Anzar, along with Mahmud Isfahani’s Commentary, Matali Al-Anzar, Sharh Tawali Al-Anwar. Calvelry, E. and Pollock, J., eds. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
al-Bihārī, Muḥibb Allāh b. ʿAbd al-Shakūr, and al-Laknawī, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Fawātiḥ al-raḥamūt bi-sharḥ musallam al-thubūt. ʿUmar, ʿAbdullāh Maḥmūd Muḥammad, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2002.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Svend. “Questioning Constructionism: Toward an Ethics of Finitude.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 46(1) (2006): 92111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Bukhārī, ʿAbd al-ʻAzīz b. Aḥmad. Kashf al-asrār ʻan uṣūl Fakhr al-Islām al-Bazdawī. ʿUmar, ʿAbdullāh Maḥmūd Muḥammad, ed. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
Carson, Thomas L.Divine Will/Divine Command Moral Theories and the Problem of Arbitrariness.” Religious Studies 48(4) (2012): 445–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Rudolph. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. London: J. and J. Knapton, 1731; reprinted New York, NY: Garland, 1976.Google Scholar
al-Dabūsī, ʿUbayd Allāh b. ʿUmar b. ʿĪsā Taʾsīs al-Naẓar. ʿAlī Yūsuf, Zakariyya, ed. 1st edn. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Zakariyya ʿAlī Yūsuf, 1972.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Eric. “‘Worthy of Worship’: A Catholic Contribution.” In Outka, G. and Reeder, J. Jr., eds. Religion and Morality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1973.Google Scholar
al-Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn. Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ. ʿAbd al-Maān, Ḥan, ed. Beirut: Dār al-Afkār al-Dawliyya, 2004.Google Scholar
Diagne, Souleymane Bachir. Comment philosopher en Islam. Fenton, MI: The Phoenix Publishing Company, 2008.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. The Theory of Morality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dughaym, Samīḥ. Mawsūʻat muṣṭalaḥāt ʻilm al-kalām al-islāmī. 2 vols. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān Nāshirūn, 1998.Google Scholar
El-Bizri, Nader. “God: Essence and Attributes,” in Winter, T. J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 121–5.Google Scholar
Emon, Anver M. Islamic Natural Law Theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emon, Anver M. Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: “Dhimmīs” and Others in the Empire of Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. “Faith and Revelation.” In Wainwright, William J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Farahat, Omar. “A Devotional Theory of Law: Epistemology and Moral Purpose in Early Islamic Jurisprudence,” Journal of Law and Religion 31(1) (2016): 4269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farahat, Omar. “Debating the Imperative Mood in Uṣūl al-Fiqh: Collective Deliberation and Legal Validity,” Oriens 46(1–2) (2018): 159–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farahat, Omar. “Commands as Divine Attributes: Islamic Jurisprudence and the Euthyphro QuestionThe Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 44, no. 4, December, 581605.CrossRef
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Aquinas Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. “Reason, Revelation, Universality and Particularity in Ethics,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 53(1) (2008): 2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Peter. God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Al-Ghazālī and the Ashʻarite School. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Texts and Studies on the Development and History of Kalām. Gutas, Dimitri, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum, 2005.Google Scholar
Frankena, William. “Is Morality Logically Dependent on Religion?” In Outka, Gene H. and Reeder, John P, eds., Religion and Morality; A Collection of Essays. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1973. 300–1.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71(4) (1958): 630–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York, NY: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Gensler, Harry. Ethics and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 57–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GhaneaBassiri, Kambiz. “The Epistemological Foundation of Conceptions of Justice in Classical Kalām: A Study of ʿAbd Al-Jabbār’s Al-Mughnī and Ibn Al-Bāqillānī’s Al-Tamhīd.” Journal of Islamic Studies 19.1 (2008): 7196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. al-Mankhūl min taʻlīqāt al-uṣūl. Ḥītū, Muḥammad Ḥasan, ed. Damascus, [n.a.], 1970.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. al-Iqtiṣād fī l-iʿtiqād. Muṣṭafā Abū l-ʿIlā, Muḥammad, ed. Cairo: Maktabat al-Jindī, 1972.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. al-Mustaṣfā min ʻilm al-uṣūl, 1st edn. Cairo: Dār al-Baṣāʾir, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Al-Ghazālī’s Moderation in Belief: al-Iqtiṣād fī al-iʻtiqād. Yaqūb, Aladdin Maḥmūd, tr. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleave, Robert. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter. “What Is Intellectual History? A Frankly Partisan Introduction to a Frankly Misunderstood Field,” in: https://sydney.edu.au/intellectual-history/documents/gordon-intellectual-history.pdf
Green, Arnold, ed. In Quest of an Islamic Humanism: Arabic and Islamic Studies in Memory of Mohamed Al-Nowaihi. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. “Al-Ghazālī’s Use of ‘Original Human Disposition’ (Fiṭra) and Its Background in the Teachings of Al-Fārābī and Avicenna,” The Muslim World 102(1) (January 1, 2012): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Malden, MA: PolityPress, 2010.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, Joseph, eds. Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. “On the Authoritativeness of Sunni Consensus.” International Journal of Middle East Studies. 18(04) (1986): 427–54.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. “Notes on the Term Qarīna in Islamic Legal Discourse.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 108(3) (1988): 475–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul Al-Fiqh. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. “On Orientalism, Self-Consciousness and History.” Islamic Law and Society 18(3–4) (2011): 387439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hare, J. E. God’s Call: Moral Realism, God’s Commands, and Human Autonomy. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Hare, J. E. God’s Command, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71(4) (1958): 593629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. “Ijmāʿ: An Integrating Force in the Muslim Community.” Islamic Studies 6(4) (1967): 389406.Google Scholar
Hector, Kevin. Theology without Metaphysics: God, Language, and the Spirit of Recognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heer, Nicholas, and Ziadeh, Farhat, eds. Islamic Law and Jurisprudence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
al-Ḥillī, Abū l-Muẓaffar Ibn al-Muṭahhar al-Ḥasan b. Yūsuf. Maʿārij al-fahm fī sharḥ al-naẓm. al-Ḥillī, ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm, ed. Qom: Dalīl-e Mā, 2006. 7980.Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted. Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J. L. Mackie. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar
Hourani, George. Islamic Rationalism: The Ethics of ʻAbd Al-Jabbār. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hudson, W. D. The Is-Ought Question: A Collection of Papers on the Central Problems in Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. [Waiheke Island]: Floating Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn Farḥūn, Ibrahīm b. ʿAlī. al-Dībāj al-mudhahhab fī maʿrifat aʿyān ʿulamāʼ al-madhhab. Abū l-Nūr, Muḥammad al-Aḥmadī, ed. 2 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Turāth li l-Ṭabʿ wa l-Nashr, 1975.Google Scholar
Ibn Kathīr, Ismaʿīl b. ʿUmar. al-Bidāya wa l-nihȳa fī l-Tārīkh. al-Khaymī, Salāḥ, ed. 2nd edn. 21 vols. Damascus: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibn Khallikān, . Wafayāt al-aʿyān wa-anbāʾ abnāʾ al-zamān mimmā thabata bi l-naql aw al-samāʿ aw athbatahu l-ʿiyān. De Slane, Baron MacGuckin, ed. Paris: Typographie de Firmin Didot Freres, 1838.Google Scholar
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad b. Mukarram. Lisān al-ʿArab. al-Kabīr, ʿAbdullāh, Hasaballah, Muḥammad, and al-Shazlī, Hāshim, eds. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1984.Google Scholar
Ibn Mattawayh, al-Ḥasan b. Aḥmad. al-Tadhkira fī aḥkām al-jawāhir wa l-aʿrāḍ. 2 vols. Cairo: al-Maʿhad al-ʿIlmī al-Faransī lil-Āthār al-Sharqiyya, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Murtaḍā, al-Mahdī Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā. Kitāb ṭabaqāt al-muʿtazila. Diwald-Wilzer, Susanna, ed. Beirut: in Kommission bei F. Steiner, 1961.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Qaṣṣār, Abū l-Ḥasan. Muqaddima fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Makhdum, Mustafa, ed. Riyadh: Dār al-Maʿlama lil-Nashr wal-Tawzīʿ, 1999.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Tilimsānī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Muḥammad. Sharḥ al-maʿālim fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub, 1999.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Mohd Radhi, “Immediate Knowledge According to al-Qadi ʿAbd al-Jabbar.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23(1) (2013): 101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sherman A.Fiction and Formalism: Toward a Functional Analysis of “Usul Al-Fiqh.” In Weiss, Bernard G., ed., Studies in Islamic Legal Theory Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī. Uṣūl al-fiqh: al-musammā bi l-fuṣūl fī l-uṣūl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2000.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. Contingency in a Sacred Law: Legal and Ethical Norms in the Muslim Fiqh. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jeff. “Does Skeptical Theism Lead to Moral Skepticism?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72(2) (2006): 403–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Jurjānī, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. al-Taʿrīfāt: muʻjam yashraḥ al-alfāẓ al-muṣṭalaḥ ʿalayhā bayna al-fuqahāʾ wa l-mutakallimīn wa l-nuḥāh wa l-ṣarfiyīn wa l-mufassirīn wa ghayrihim. [n.a.] Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1938.Google Scholar
al-Juwaynī, Imām al-Ḥaramayn Abū l-Maʿālī. Kitāb al-irshād ilā qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād. Mūsā, Muḥammad Yūsuf and ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd, ʿAlī, ed. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1950.Google Scholar
al-Juwaynī, Imām al-Ḥaramayn Abū l-Maʿālī. al-Burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh. al-Dīb, ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm, ed. 2 vols. Doha: Jāmiʿat Qaṭar, 1979.Google Scholar
al-Kaʿbī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Aḥmad, Faḍl al-iʿtizāl wa-ṭabaqāt al-muʿtazila. al-Jushamī, Muḥsin and Sayyid, Fuʾād, ed. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyya lil-Nashr, 1974.Google Scholar
Kahane, Howard, and Cavender, Nancy. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Learning, 2005.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2004.Google Scholar
Kant, ImmanuelGroundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Katz, Marion Holmes. Women in the Mosque: A History of Legal Thought and Social Practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kawall, Jason. “Moral Realism and Arbitrariness.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 43(1) (2005): 109–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Khabbāzī, ʿUmar b. Muḥammad. al-Mughnī fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Baqā, Muḥammad Maẓhar, ed. Mecca: Jāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā, 1983.Google Scholar
al-Kirmāstī, Yūsuf b. Ḥusayn. Zubdat al-wuṣūl ilā ʿumdat al-uṣūl. Ḥajqahlī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, ed. 1st edn. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 2008.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter D.Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives 33(s13) (1999): 297325.Google Scholar
Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian. “An (Un)awareness of What Is Missing.” Modern Age 56(1) (2014): 1927.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M.Skepticism about Practical Reason.” The Journal of Philosophy 83(1) (1986): 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. The Sources of Normativity. O’Neill, Onora, ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Lāmishī, Maḥmūd b. Zayd. Kitāb fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Turki, Abdulhamid, ed. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1995.Google Scholar
Ladd, John. Ethical Relativism. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985.Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. “The Developed Kalām Tradition.” In Winter, T. J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 7790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftin, R. Keith. “C. S. Lewis’s Dangerous Idea: A Philosophical Defense of Lewis’s Argument from Reason.” Christian Scholar’s Review 37(3) (2008): 389–91.Google Scholar
Lowry, Joseph E. Early Islamic Legal Theory: The Risāla of Muḥammad Ibn Idrīs Al-Shāfiʻī. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Social Structures and Their Threats to Moral Agency.” Philosophy 74(289) (1999): 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York, NY: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilfred and Schmidtke, Sabine. “The Shīʿite and Khārijite Contribution to Pre-Ashʿarite Kalām.” In Morewedge, Parviz, ed. Islamic Philosophical Theology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilfred and Schmidtke, Sabine. Rational Theology in Interfaith Communication: Abu-I-Husayn Al-Basri’s Mu’tazili Theology among the Karaites in the Fatimid Age. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “The Juridical Theology of Shâfi’î: Origins and Significance of Uṣûl Al-Fiqh.” Studia Islamica (59) (1984): 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhlūf, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Shajarat al-nūr al-zakiyya fī ṭabaqāt al-mālikiyya. Makhlūf, Muḥammad, ed. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaʿa al-Salafiyya, 1930.Google Scholar
al-Malāhimī, Rukn al-Dīn. Kitāb al-Muʿtamad fī usūl al-dīn. McDermott, Martin and Madelung, Wilferd, eds. London: al-Hoda, 1991.Google Scholar
Mankadīm, Aḥmad. Sharḥ al-uṣūl al-khamsa. ʻUthmān, ʻAbd al-Karīm, ed. Cairo: Maktabat Wahba, 1965.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich. Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, Brinkley. The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1993.Google Scholar
Michot, Yahya. “Revelation.” In O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine, eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 180–96.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble Publishing, Inc., 2005.Google Scholar
Morewedge, Parviz. Islamic Philosophical Theology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kai. Ethics without God. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy; The Case of Wagner; Kaufmann, Walter, ed. and tr. New York, NY: Vintage Books Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Kaufmann, Walter, tr. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Nauckhoff, Josefine, tr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy, and Sandis, Constantine, eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opwis, Felicitas. Maṣlaḥa and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century. Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outka, Gene H., and Reeder, John P.. Religion and Morality: A Collection of Essays. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. “Epistemic Probability and Evil.” In Howard-Snyder, Daniel, ed., The Evidential Argument from Evil. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 1996. 6996.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, ed. The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Plato, . Five Dialogues. Cooper, John M., ed., Grube, G. M. A., tr. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co., 2002.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. Divine Commands and Moral Requirements. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. “Divine Command Theories of Ethics.” In Borchert, Donald M., ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edn, vol. 3. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference, 2006, 93–4.Google Scholar
al-Qurashī, ʿAbd al-Qādir b. Muḥammad. al-Jawāhir al-muḍiyya fī ṭabaqāt al-ḥanafiyya. al-Ḥulw, ʿAbd al-Fattāh Muḥammad, ed. 2nd edn. Cairo: Dār Hajr, 1993.Google Scholar
Rachels, James. “God and Human Attitudes.” Religious Studies 7(4) (1971). 325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. Engaging Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Promises and Obligations.” In Hacker, P. M. S., and Raz, J., eds. Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad b.ʿUmar. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm al-uṣūl. ʿAṭā, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1999.Google Scholar
Reinhart, A. Kevin. “Islamic Law as Islamic Ethics.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 11(2) (1983): 186203.Google Scholar
Reinhart, A. Kevin. Before Revelation: The Boundaries of Muslim Moral Thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Reinhart, A. Kevin. “‘Like the Difference Between Heaven and Earth’: Ḥanafī and Shāfiʿī Distinction of Farḍ and Wājib in Theology and Uṣūl.” In Weiss, Bernard G. ed., Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2002. 205–34.Google Scholar
Renard, John, ed. Islamic Theological Themes: A Primary Source Reader. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottenberg, Annette T., and Winchell, Donna Haisty. The Structure of Argument. New York, NY: Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Rowe, William, The Cosmological Argument. New York, NY: Fordam University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich. “Occasionalism.” In Schmidtke, Sabine, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 347–63.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, Behnam. The Logic of Law-Making in Islam: Women and Prayer in the Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1979.Google Scholar
al-Samʿānī, Abū l-Muẓaffar. Qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī l-uṣūl. Shafiʿī, Muḥammad Ḥasan Ismaʿīl, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
al-Samarqandī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Mīzān al-uṣūl fī natāʾij al-ʿuqūl fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Saʿdī, ʿAbd al-Malik ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, ed. Baghdad: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa l-Shuʾūn al-Dīniyya, 1987.Google Scholar
al-Sarakhsī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. al-Afghānī, Abū l-Wafā, ed. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1993.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick F. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schmidke, Sabine, Sklare, David, and Adang, Camilla, eds. A Common Rationality: Muʿtazilism in Islam and Judaism. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag in Kommission, 2007.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.How to Derive ‘Ought’ from ‘Is’.” In Hudson, W. D., ed., The Is-Ought Question: A Collection of Papers on the Central Problems in Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
al-Shahrastānī, Abū al-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm. al-Milal wa l-niḥal. Muḥammad, Aḥmad Fahmī, ed. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1992.Google Scholar
Shaw, Aeddan. “The Prescriptivist Account of the Normativity of Meaning Debate.” In Stelmach, Jerzy, Brożek, Bartosz, and Hohol, Mateusz, eds., The Many Faces of Normativity. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013. 177–89.Google Scholar
al-Shīrāzī, Abū Isḥāq. al-Lumaʿ fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Shirāzī, Ṣadr al-Dīn (Mulla Ṣadrā), “Principle, Concerning His Speech.” Morris, James W., tr. In Renard, John, ed., Islamic Theological Themes: A Primary Source Reader. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014, 207–8.Google Scholar
Sībawayh, ʿAmr b. ʿUthmān. Kitāb Sībawayh. Derenbourg, Hartwig, ed. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1881.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C., and Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, Robert J. Evidence for God from Physics and Philosophy: Extending the Legacy of Monsignor Georges Lemaître and St. Thomas Aquinas. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Stelmach, Jerzy, Brożek, Bartosz, and Hohol, Mateusz, eds., The Many Faces of Normativity. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Stone, Jerome. Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar
al-Subkī, Tāj al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb b. ʿAlī. Ṭabaqāt al-Shāfiʿiyya al-kubrā. al-Tanahī, Maḥmūd Muḥammad and al-Ḥulw, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Muḥammad, eds. Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya, 1918.Google Scholar
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. al-Maṭāliʿ al-saʿīda fī sharḥ al-farīda. Ḥusayn, Nabhān Yāsīn, ed. Baghdad: Dār al-Rīsāla, 1977.Google Scholar
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. al-Itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. al-Qurʾāniyya, Markaz al-Dirāsāt, ed. 3rd edn. Medina: Majmaʻ al-Malik Fahd li-Ṭibāʿat al-Maṣḥaf al-Sharīf, 2011.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn, et al. al-Shurūḥ wa l-ḥawāshī ʿalā l-ʿaqāʾid al-Nasafīyya li-ahl al-sunna wa l-jamāʿa al-Ashāʿira wa l-Māturīdīyya. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2013.Google Scholar
al-Tahānawī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī. Kashshāf iṣṭilāḥāt al-funūn wa l-ʿulūm al-Islāmiyya. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1980.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Usmandī, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. Badhl al-naẓar fī l-uṣūl. ʿAbd al-Barr, Muḥammad Zakī, ed. Cairo: Maktabat Dār al-Turāth, 1992.Google Scholar
Valdés, Mario J. A Ricœur Reader Reflection and Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Moral Agents and Their Deserts: The Character of Mu’tazilite Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Ibn Taymiyya’s Theological Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Vishanoff, David R. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics: How Sunni Legal Theorists Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society, 2011.Google Scholar
Wakin, Jeanette. “Interpretation of Divine Command in the Jurisprudence of Muwaffaq al-Dīn Ibn Qudāmah.” In Heer, Nicholas, ed., Islamic Law and Jurisprudence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990, 35.Google Scholar
Walbridge, John. God and Logic in Islam: The Caliphate of Reason. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, 2004.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Bernard G., ed. Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard G., The Search for God’s Law: Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf Al-Din Al-Amidi. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward. “Utilitarianism and the Divine Command Theory.” American Philosophical Quarterly 21(4) (1984): 311–18.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward. The Nature of God: An Inquiry into Divine Attributes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Truth & Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Winter, T. J. The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. The Philosophy of the Kalam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim That God Speaks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Atlanta, GA: Lockwood Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Omar Farahat, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
  • Online publication: 25 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108614252.009
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Omar Farahat, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
  • Online publication: 25 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108614252.009
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Omar Farahat, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
  • Online publication: 25 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108614252.009
Available formats
×