Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T17:23:44.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Functional analysis and character transformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2009

Manfred D. Laubichler
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Jane Maienschein
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: PATTERN AND PROCESS

It is widely recognized that Darwin's theory of evolution incorporates, first, a historical “pattern” component asserting that species originated by divergent transformation from common ancestry, and that the similarities and differences among species reflect that pattern; and second, a “process” component asserting that this transformation occurs largely (but not exclusively) by the mechanism of natural selection. Given that these evolutionary patterns are products of evolutionary processes, it is unsurprising that systematists have traditionally relied on assumptions about process to reconstruct patterns of evolutionary transformation. But this use of process assumptions has been a source of dispute among systematists. Traditional “evolutionary systematists” have explicitly and systematically relied on process assumptions, while “cladists” have typically rejected the use of assumptions, on charges of circularity: if process assumptions are used to reconstruct evolutionary history, they can only be trivially confirmed by that reconstruction.

The primary focus of cladists' criticism has been functional analysis. The basic idea behind functional analysis is that once we understand how characters function, we can infer the operation of natural selection. And from that we can infer the likely directions of transformation, which can then be used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of biological taxa. Cladists typically reject functional analysis, arguing that we should instead reconstruct evolutionary history on the basis of a theoretically neutral parsimony principle. It is not possible here to give a detailed account of the full range of the debate over functional analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bock, W. (1981). Functional-adaptive analysis in evolutionary classification. American Zoologist 21, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, W. and Wahlert, G. (1965). Adaptation and the form–function complex. Evolution 19(3), 269–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1981). The use of functional and adaptive criteria in phylogenetic systematics. American Zoologist 21, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J. (1980). Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D. (1979). Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Gutmann, W. F. (1981). Relationships between invertebrate phyla based on functional mechanical analysis of the hydrostatic skeleton. American Zoologist 21, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. Translated by Davis, D. and Zangerl, R.. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. (1997). Body size evolution in cretaceous molluscs and the status of cope's rule. Nature 385, 250–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFadden, B. 1985. Patterns of phylogeny and rates of evolution in fossil horses: hipparions from the Miocene and Pliocene of North America. Paleobiology 11(3), 245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFadden, B. (1986). Fossil horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus: scaling, Cope's law and the evolution of body size. Paleobiology 12(4), 355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, D. (1994). Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution 48(6), 1747–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×