Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T21:15:15.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VI - Practice Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2022

Sharon N. Covington
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, MD
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Greenbaum, Z. How well is telepsychology working? Researchers are pinpointing what we know – and what we need to learn – about these treatment options. Monit Psychol 2020;51(5):46.Google Scholar
Morgan, RD, Patrick, AR, Magaletta, PR. Does the use of telemental health alter the treatment experience? Inmates’ perceptions of telemental health versus face-to-face treatment modalities. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76(1):158162.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Guarnieri, MA, Pruitt, LD, Luxton, DD, Johnson, K. Patient perceptions of telemental health: systematic review of direct comparisons to in-person psychotherapeutic treatments. Telemedicine and e-Health 2015;21(8):652660.Google Scholar
Topooco, N, Riper, H, Araya, R, et al. Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: a European stakeholder survey. Internet Interventions 2017;8:19.Google Scholar
Shklarski, L, Abrams, A, Bakst, E. Navigating changes in the physical and psychological spaces of psychotherapists during Covid-19: when home becomes the office. Pract Innov 2021;6(1):5556.Google Scholar
Bailenson, JN. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind and Behavior 2021;2(1) (online). Scholar
Domar, AD, Gross, J, Rooney, K, Boivin, J. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 2015;104(7):440–451e7.Google Scholar
Aafes van Doorn, K, Békés, V, Prout, TA. Grappling with our therapeutic relationship and professional self-doubt during COVID-19: will we use video therapy again? Counselling Psychology Quarterly 2020 (online). Scholar
Békés, V, Aafes-van Doorn, K. Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Psychother Integr 2020;30(2):238247. Scholar
Drum, KB, Littleton, HL. Therapeutic boundaries in telepsychology: unique issues and best practice recommendations. Prof Psychol Res 2014;45(5):309315.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. Am Psychologist 2013;60(9):791800.Google Scholar
Barrett, JE, Kolmes, K. The practice of tele-mental health: ethical, legal and clinical issues. Pract Innov 2016;1(1):5366.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2017;107(2): e3e10.Google Scholar
Riddle, MP. Psychological assessment of gestational carrier candidates: current approaches, challenges and future considerations. Fertil Steril 2020;13(5):897902.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidance on qualifications for fertility counselors: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2021;115(6):14111415.Google Scholar
Luxton, DD, Pruitt, LD, Osenbach, JE. Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2014;45(1):2735. Scholar
Grady, BJ, Melcer, T. A retrospective evaluation of telemental health care services for remote military populations. Telemedicine and e-Health 2005;11:551558. Scholar
Harris, E, Younggren, J. Risk management in the digital world. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2011;42(6):412418.Google Scholar


Swain, M, Petok, WD. Legal issues for fertility counselors. In Covington, SN. Ed. Fertility Counseling Clinical Guide and Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 296307.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association, 2016. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
National Association of Social Workers. Code of Ethics [pamphlet]. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers, 2021. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
American Association of Marriage and Family Counselors. Code of Ethics. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Ethical Code. The Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry. Published 2013. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Code of Ethical Practice for Psychiatric Nursing and Foundations of Psychiatric Nursing Practice. Available at: See also: and [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
British Infertility Counseling Association. Available at: Scholar
Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority. Code of Practice, 9th ed., with 2019 updates. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
ANZICA. Guidelines on Professional Standards of Practice: Infertility Counseling. Published August 2018. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Guidance on Qualifications for Fertility Counselors: A Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril 2021;115(6):14111415.Google Scholar
International Infertility Counseling Association. Compendium of Fertility Counseling Organizations Across the Globe. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law 104–191, 110 Stat. 1936. Washington, DC: The United States Senate, 1996.Google Scholar
PCISSD. Data Security Standards Overview [Internet]. [Cited May 29, 2014] Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge, Inc., 490 A. 2d 720, 62 Md. App. 519 (1985).Google Scholar
Consideration of the gestational carrier: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;100(6):10171021.Google Scholar
Lustgarten, SD, Garrison, YL, Sinnard, MT, Flynn, AWP. Digital privacy in mental healthcare: current issues and recommendations for technology use. Curr Opin Psychol 2020;36:2531. Scholar
Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
2003, 2005, 2013. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022]; solely or in collaboration with the APA Insurance Trust (APA Practice Organization & APA Insurance Trust).Google Scholar
Yaqoob, T, Abbas, H, Atiquzzaman, M. Security vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and regulations of networked medical devices – a review. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2019;21:37233768; cited in Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:9668. Scholar
The American Psychological Association. Record-keeping guidelines, Am Psychol 2007;62:9931004.Google Scholar


Kass, LR. Babies by means of in vitro fertilization: unethical experiments on the unborn? N Engl J Med 1971;285(21):11741179.Google Scholar
King, LP. Should clinicians set limits on reproductive autonomy? Hastings Cent Rep 2017;47(Suppl. 3):S50S56.Google Scholar
University of Minnesota’s Center for Bioethics. Ethics of Organ Transplantation. 2004. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Robertson, JA. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. Review Essay/Procreative Liberty. Crim Justice Ethics 1996;15(1):6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JA. Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10(S1):97101.Google Scholar
Robertson, JA. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics. B.U.L. Rev 1996;76(3):421482.Google Scholar
Purdy, L. Children of choice: whose children? At what cost? Wash Lee Law Rev 1995;52(1):197224.Google Scholar
Meilaender, G. Products of the will: Robertson’s children of choice. Wash Lee Law Rev 1995;52(1):173195.Google Scholar
Prusak, BG. Parental Obligations and Bioethics. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Sandel, MJ. The case against perfection: what’s wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. The Atlantic Online. Published April 2004. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Cohen, CB. Give me children or I shall die! New reproductive technologies and harm to children. Hastings Cent Rep 1996;40(4):1927.Google Scholar
McDougall, R. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection. J Med Ethics 2005;31:601605.Google Scholar
Overall, C. Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. London: Routledge, 1987.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 390, December 2007. Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(6):14791487. Scholar
Parks, JA. Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy. Bioethics 2010;24(7):333340.Google Scholar
Tam, H. Communitarianism, Sociology of. In: Wright, JD (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 4. Oxford: Elsevier, 2015, 311316.Google Scholar
Doyle, P. The U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. How it has contributed to the evaluation of assisted reproduction technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1999;15(1):310.Google Scholar
What is SART? Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Weiner, C. Social responsibility in genetic engineering: historical perspectives. In: Nordgren, A. Gene Therapy and Ethics: Studies in Bioethics and Research Ethics, 4th ed. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University Press, 1999, 5164.Google Scholar
Timeline of Advances in the Field of Reproductive Medicine. Available at: [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. Genetics and equality. Science 1962;137 (3524):112115.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats