Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-2p87r Total loading time: 0.748 Render date: 2021-10-21T06:37:17.630Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Chapter 7 - The Law and Ethics of Female Genital Cutting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2019

Sarah M. Creighton
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Lih-Mei Liao
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery
Solution to What Problem?
, pp. 58 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Weston, J. Female genital mutilation: The law as it relates to children. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(9):864–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, LM, Creighton, SM. Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: How should healthcare providers respond? BMJ 2007;334(7603):1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, LM, Taghinejadi, N, Creighton, SM. An analysis of the content and clinical implications of online advertisements for female genital cosmetic surgery. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e001908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, S. From vaginal exception to exceptional vagina: The biopolitics of female genital cosmetic surgery. Sexualities. 2012;15(7):778–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadian, YS, Pradeep, K, Verma, V. Feminizing genitoplasty in congenital adrenal hyperplasia: A new method for clitoral reduction. Arch Int Surg. 2016;6(3):153–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, N, Barr, M. Intersex surgery, female genital cutting, and the selective condemnation of “cultural practices.” Harv CR-CL Law Rev. 2005;40(1):71140.Google Scholar
Davis, DS. Male and female genital alteration: A collision course with the law. Health Matrix. 2001;11:487570.Google ScholarPubMed
Abusharaf, RM. Virtuous cuts: Female genital circumcision in an African ontology. Differences. 2001;12(1):112–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdulcadir, J, Ahmadu, FS, Catania, L, et al. Seven things to know about female genital surgeries in Africa. Hastings Center Rep. 2012;42(6):1927.Google Scholar
WHO/UN. Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2008. Available from: www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw52/statements_missions/Interagency_Statement_on_Eliminating_FGM.pdf
Stewart, PJ, Strathern, A., eds. Ritual. London: Routledge; 2017.Google Scholar
Taylor, JR, Lockwood, AP, Taylor, AJ. The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. BJU Int. 1996;77(2):291–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilcken, A, Keil, T, Dick, B. Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: A systematic review of prevalence and complications. Bull WHO. 2010;88(12):907–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramos, S, Boyle, GJ. Ritual and medical circumcision among Filipino boys. In Denniston, GC, Hodges, FM, Milos, MF (eds), Understanding circumcision. New York: Springer; 2001, pp. 253–70.Google Scholar
Glass, M. Forced circumcision of men (abridged). J Med Ethics. 2014;40(8):567–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pounder, DJ. Ritual mutilation: Subincision of the penis among Australian Aborigines. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1983;4(3):227–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rickwood, AM. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int. 1999;83(S1):4551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallerstein, E. Circumcision: The uniquely American medical enigma. Urol Clin North Am. 1985;12(1):123–32.Google Scholar
Hofvander, Y. New law on male circumcision in Sweden. Lancet. 2002;359(9306):630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earp, BD, Sardi, LM, Jellison, WA. False beliefs predict increased circumcision satisfaction in a sample of US American men. Cult Health Sex. 2018;20(8):945955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, T, Carmack, A. Long-term adverse outcomes from neonatal circumcision reported in a survey of 1,008 men: An overview of health and human rights implications. Int J Hum Rights. 2017;21(2):189218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, PJ. A survey of subjective foreskin sensation in 600 intact men. In Denniston, GC, Grassivaro Gallo, P, Hodges, FM, Milos, MF, Viviani, F (eds), Bodily integrity and the politics of circumcision. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006, pp. 177–88.Google Scholar
Bossio, JA, Pukall, CF, Steele, SS. Examining penile sensitivity in neonatally circumcised and intact men using quantitative sensory testing. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1848–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisch, M, Simonsen, J. Cultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: Two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 1977–2013. Surgeon. 2018;16(2):107118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krill, AJ, Palmer, LS, Palmer, JS. Complications of circumcision. Sci World J. 2011;11:2458–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earp, BD, Allareddy, V, Rotta, AT. Factors associated with early deaths following neonatal male circumcision in the United States, 2001–2010. Clinical Pediatrics. 2018;57(13):15321540.CrossRef
Gonzalez, L. South Africa: Over half a million initiates maimed under the knife. All Africa. 2014; June 25. Available from: www.health-e.org.za/2014/06/25/half-million-initiates-maimed-knife/
Mabuza, W. Report on public hearings on male initiation schools in South Africa, 2010. Commission for the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities. Report 978–0-620–51683-9 (pp. 177). 2010. Available from: www.health-e.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CRL-Report-on-Public-Hearings-on-Male-Initiation-Schools-in-South-Africa.pdf
Tobian, AA, Gray, RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1479–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bossio, JA, Pukall, CF, Steele, S. A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature. J Sex Med. 2014;11(12):2847–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisch, M, Earp, BD. Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence. Global Public Health. 2016. 2018;13(5):626–641.
Saito, S, Hata, H, Inamura, Y, Kitamura, S, Yanagi, T, Shimizu, H. Vulvar basal cell carcinoma with adhesion of the labia majora and minora. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42(1):92–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, C. Exorcising excision: Medico-legal issues arising from male and female genital surgery in Australia. J Law Med. 2001;9(1):5867.Google ScholarPubMed
Shell-Duncan, B, Hernlund, Y, eds. Female “circumcision” in Africa: Culture, controversy, and change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2000.Google Scholar
Shahvisi, A. Cutting slack and cutting corners: An ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ “Female genital alteration: A compromise solution.” J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):156–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, A, El-Mouelhy, MT, Ragab, AR. Female genital mutilation/cutting and issues of sexuality in Egypt. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(36):181–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. Interpreting female genital cutting: Moving beyond the impasse. Ann Rev Sex Res. 2000;11(1):158–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Merli, C. Sunat for girls in southern Thailand: Its relation to traditional midwifery, male circumcision and other obstetrical practices. Finn J Ethnic Migrat. 2008;3(2):3241.Google Scholar
Merli, C. Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand’s Muslims: Rituals, biomedical practice and local discourses. Cult Health Sex. 2010;12(7):725–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taher, M. Understanding FGM in the Dawoodi Bohra community: An exploratory study. Sahiyo. 2017. Available from: https://sahiyo.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/sahiyo_report_final-updatedbymt2.pdf
WHO. Classification of female genital mutilation. World Health Organization. 2017. Available from: www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/overview/en/
Hamori, CA. Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia: Labiaplasty and beyond. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2014;134(4):661–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, SB. Female circumcision and clitoridectomy in the United States: a history of a medical treatment. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2014.Google Scholar
Veale, D, Daniels, J. Cosmetic clitoridectomy in a 33-year-old woman. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(3):725–30.Google Scholar
Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No 378: “Vaginal rejuvenation” and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):737.CrossRef
Earp, BD. Hymen “restoration” in cultures of oppression: How can physicians promote individual patient welfare without becoming complicit in the perpetuation of unjust social norms? J Med Ethics. 2013;40(6):431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millner, VS, Eichold, BH, Sharpe, TH, Lynn, SC. First glimpse of the functional benefits of clitoral hood piercings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):675–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narain, S, Eva, L, Luesley, D. A rare case of pseudolymphoma of the vulva. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(3):254–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mowat, H, McDonald, K, Dobson, AS, Fisher, J, Kirkman, M. The contribution of online content to the promotion and normalisation of female genital cosmetic surgery: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(110):110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. UNICEF. 2013. Available from: www.unicef.org/media/files/UNICEF_FGM_report_July_2013_Hi_res.pdf
Conroy, RM. Female genital mutilation: Whose problem, whose solution? BMJ. 2006;333(7559):106–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaefer, M, Rink, RC. Treatment of the enlarged clitoris. Front Pediatr. 2017;5(125):111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catania, L, Abdulcadir, O, Puppo, V, Verde, JB, Abdulcadir, J, Abdulcadir, D. Pleasure and orgasm in women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1666–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, AJ, Bewley, S. Medicalization of female genital mutilation: Harm reduction or unethical? Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2014;24(1):2930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arie, S. Cosmetic industry regulation is only skin deep. BMJ Online. 2017;357(j3047):12.Google ScholarPubMed
Earp, BD. Between moral relativism and moral hypocrisy: Reframing the debate on “FGM.” Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2016;26(2):105–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, PL. Cosmetic genital surgery in children and adolescents. Best Practice & Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;48(1):137146.
Kelly, B, Foster, C. Should female genital cosmetic surgery and genital piercing be regarded ethically and legally as female genital mutilation? BJOG. 2012;119(4):389–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsdotter, S, Mestre, RM. Female genital mutilation in Europe: An analysis of court cases. 2015. Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7fff7a7b-fc84-11e5-b713-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003. Available from: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31/pdfs/ukpga_20030031_en.pdf
Dustin, M. Female genital mutilation/cutting in the UK: Challenging the inconsistencies. Eur J Womens Stud. 2010;17(1):723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, NS, Deans, R, Michala, L, Liao, LM, Creighton, SM. Clinical characteristics of well women seeking labial reduction surgery: A prospective study. BJOG. 2011;118(12):1507–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A. What is the dynamic between the “cosmetic versus cultural surgery” discourse and efforts to end FGM in the UK? 2013. Dissertation, Oxford Brookes University. Available from: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2015/03/Alice_Edwards_Dissertation_Dec_13_FGM.pdf
Shahvisi, A. Female genital mutilation and cultural pluralism: Racism, sexism and hypocrisy. In Kuehlmeyer, K, Odukoya, D, Klingler, C, Huxtable, R (eds), Ethical, legal and social aspects of healthcare for migrants: Perspectives from the UK and Germany.London: Routledge; 2018.Google Scholar
Arora, KS, Jacobs, AJ. Female genital alteration: A compromise solution. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):148–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, MP, Placik, OJ, Benson III, RH, et al. A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med. 2010;7(4):1565–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Medical Association. Female genital mutilation: Caring for patients and safeguarding children. 2011. BMA: London. Available from: www.bma.org.uk/-media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work/ethics/femalegenitalmutilation.pdf
Leye, E, Ysebaert, I, Deblonde, J, et al. Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(2):182–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earp, BD. Does female genital mutilation have health benefits? The problem with medicalizing morality. Quillette. 2017. Available from: http://quillette.com/2017/08/15/female-genital-mutilation-health-benefits-problem-medicalizing-morality/
Shweder, RA. The goose and the gander: The genital wars. Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):348–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earp, BD. Infant circumcision and adult penile sensitivity: Implications for sexual experience. Trends Urol Mens Health. 2016;7(4):1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, C. On bodily autonomy. In Toombs, SK (ed), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. Dordrecht: Springer; 2001, pp. 417439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazor, J. The child’s interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(7):421–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darby, RJ. The child’s right to an open future: Is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision? J Med Ethics. 2013;39(7):463–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earp, BD, Darby, R. Circumcision, sexual experience, and harm. U Penn J Int Law. 2017;37(2–online), 156.Google Scholar
Myers, A. Neonatal male circumcision, if not already commonplace, would be plainly unacceptable by modern ethical standards. Am J Bioethics. 2015;15(2):54–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusa, M, Barilan, YM. Cultural circumcision in EU public hospitals: An ethical discussion. Bioethics. 2009;23(8):470–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO. Male circumcision: Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. World Health Organization. 2007. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43749/1/9789241596169_eng.pdf
Goodman, J. Jewish circumcision: An alternative perspective. BJU Int. 1999;83(S1):27.Google Scholar
Xu, B, Goldman, H. Newborn circumcision in Victoria, Australia: Reasons and parental attitudes. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(11):1019–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, AJ, Arora, KS. Punishment of minor female genital ritual procedures: Is the perfect the enemy of the good? Dev World Bioethics. 2017;17(2):134–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Earp, BD. In defence of genital autonomy for children. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):158–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earp, BD, Hendry, J, Thomson, M. Reason and paradox in medical and family law: Shaping children’s bodies. Med Law Rev. 2017;25(4):604–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Belluck, P. Michigan case adds U.S. dimension to debate on genital mutilation. New York Times. 2017. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/health/genital-mutilation-muslim-dawoodi-bohra-michigan-case.html
Veale, D. Reply to Bewley (2012). Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(3):325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manderson, L. Local rites and body politics: Tensions between cultural diversity and human rights. Int Feminist J Politics. 2004;6(2):285307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadu, FS, Shweder, RA. Disputing the myth of the sexual dysfunction of circumcised women: An interview with Fuambai S. Ahmadu by Richard A. Shweder. Anthropol Today. 2009;25(6):14–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestbostad, E, Blystad, A. Reflections on female circumcision discourse in Hargeysa, Somaliland: Purified or mutilated? Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;18(2):2235.Google ScholarPubMed
Shweder, RA. What about “female genital mutilation”? And why understanding culture matters in the first place. Daedalus. 2000;129(4):209–32.Google Scholar
Svoboda, JS. Promoting genital autonomy by exploring commonalities between male, female, intersex, and cosmetic female genital cutting. Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):237–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, A, Barry, H III. Pain, fear, and circumcision in boys’ adolescent initiation ceremonies. Cross Cult Res. 2017; 1069397116685780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellsten, SK. Rationalising circumcision: From tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom – critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):248–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aggleton, P. “Just a snip”? A social history of male circumcision. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(29):1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darby, R. A surgical temptation: The demonization of the foreskin and the rise of circumcision in Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013.Google Scholar
Sawires, SR, Dworkin, SL, Fiamma, A, Peacock, D, Szekeres, G, Coates, TJ. Male circumcision and HIV/AIDS: Challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):708–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almroth, L, Almroth‐Berggren, V, Hassanein, OM, et al. A community based study on the change of practice of female genital mutilation in a Sudanese village. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;74(2):179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstein, LF. Attitudes and attitude differences to female genital mutilation in the Sudan: Is there a change on the horizon? Soc Sci Med A: Med Psychol Med Sociol. 1978;12:417–21.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. Global Islamophobia: Muslims and moral panic in the West. London: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
Spivak, GC. Can the subaltern speak? In Morris, R (ed), Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea. New York: Columbia University Press; 1998/ 2010, pp. 2178.Google Scholar
UNICEF. The dynamics of social change towards the abandonment of female genital mutilation/cutting in five African countries. UNICEF. 2010. Available from; www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_insight_eng.pdf
Johansen, RE, Diop, NJ, Laverack, G, Leye, E. What works and what does not: A discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013(348248):110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townley, L, Bewley, S. Why the law against female genital mutilation should be scrapped. The Conversation. 2017. Available from: https://theconversation.com/why-the-law-against-female-genital-mutilation-should-be-scrapped-79851
Shahvisi, A. Why UK doctors should be troubled by female genital mutilation legislation. Clin Ethics. 2016;12(2):102–8.Google Scholar
12
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×