Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T10:45:30.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Factions and political development in the central Andes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Elizabeth M. Brumfiel
Affiliation:
Albion College, Michigan
John W. Fox
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Get access

Summary

Investigators of prehistory generally concur that political competition has often been critical to the development of social complexity. Among the key forms of political contention are hierarchical, peer, polity, expansionist, and factional competition. These are politically joined processes whose significance varies (1) as the complexity and reach of the sociopolitical unit is transformed, (2) as the interaction emphasizes internally or externally directed conflict, and (3) as the competition is structured vertically (e.g., between classes) or horizontally (e.g., between polities). This paper focuses attention on factionalism in the Upper Mantaro Valley, Peru, during the late pre-Inka, Inka, and early colonial periods. These successive periods provide an excellent opportunity for examining how political activity was transformed as the context of interaction shifted rapidly from autonomous, to imperial, to colonial rule (Fig. 15.1).

Before discussing the case studies, I would like to underscore four main points concerning the role of factional competition in political development. First, although they lie outside sanctioned structures of sociopolitical interaction, factions pervade political activity from the simplest to the most complex societies. Second, because factionalism often cross-cuts more formal sociopolitical groups, it provides a means by which individuals or groups restructure ties to obtain power and resources (Salisbury and Silverman 1977). The groups that are formed are often volatile, ephemeral, and based on mutual short-term goals, but the outcome of the competition may be a reformation of more formal kinds of political interaction or, less radically, a shift in leadership. Third, despite the scant archaeological interest in factionalism in empirical studies, numerous theories contain this kind of competition as a key element of political change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×