Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T09:50:10.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Ethnicity and political control in a complex society: the Tarascan state of prehispanic Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Elizabeth M. Brumfiel
Affiliation:
Albion College, Michigan
John W. Fox
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Get access

Summary

The interrelationship between ethnic units and a central political authority is known historically to have been crucial to the operation of complex societies. In the process of this interaction central authorities, particularly ruling elites, have created new ethnic groups, have altered the attributes which define ethnic identity, and have restructured relationships between ethnic groups (Enloe 1980:17ff.). Political authorities have two fundamental goals for the survival of their centralized power: (1) the economic exploitation of populations and resources, and (2) the protection of the integrity of the state frontiers. In achieving both these goals ethnic diversity can either facilitate or hinder elite action.

Centralized authorities can assure maximal access to populations and resources when decision making flows from the top downward, according to principles established by dominant elites. Ethnic diversity often disrupts this flow, by interposing local or regional leaders, who acquire power not through their allegiance to central hierarchies, but through positions of ethnic status. Decision making may be undertaken to reflect the needs of local populations or local elites at the expense of the state. On the other hand, under conditions of rapid territorial expansion, when large populations and/or resources are being incorporated into a single political unit, the existing lines of authority, legitimacy, and social cohesion present in ethnically distinct populations may provide central authorities with an infrastructure of political and economic networks that can be tapped to the benefit of the state. In a similar manner, the maintenance of the state's territorial integrity demands populations willing to defend that territory, and not themselves act to foster rebellion against central authority.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×