Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 2.588 Render date: 2022-08-17T11:50:59.556Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
Explorations in Latin Literature Explorations in Latin Literature
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

Book contents

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2021

Denis Feeney
Introduction by
Stephen Hinds
Denis Feeney
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Stephen Hinds
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 396 - 430
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Adams, J.N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 1999a. ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and centurionate’, JRS 89: 109–34Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 1999b. ‘Nominative personal pronouns and some patterns of speech in Republican and Augustan poetry’, in Adams, J.N. and Mayer, R.G. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford. 97–133Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, J. 1973. The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Ahern, C.F. 1991. ‘Horace’s rewriting of Homer in Carmen 1.6’, CPh 86: 301–14Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael von. 1981. ‘Mythos und römische Realität in Ovids “Metamorphosen”’, ANRW 2.31.4: 2328–42Google Scholar
Allan, W. 2008. Euripides: Helen. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Allen, A. 1986. ‘Sacrificial negligence in Catullus’, Latomus 45: 861–3Google Scholar
Altick, R.D. 1991. The Presence of the Present: Topics of the Day in the Victorian Novel. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Alton, E.H. 1922. ‘Quaestiunculae Ovidianae’, Hermathena 19.43: 276–91Google Scholar
Alton, E.H., Wormell, D.E.W. and Courtney, E. 1978/1985. P. Ovidi Nasonis Fastorum Libri Sex2. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Anders, H.R.D. 1904. Shakespeare’s Books: A Dissertation on Shakespeare’s Reading and the Immediate Sources of his Works. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.D., Parsons, P.J. and Nisbet, R.J.M. 1978. ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm’, JRS 68: 125–55Google Scholar
Anderson, W.S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. Toronto, Buffalo, NY and LondonGoogle Scholar
Andreau, J. 1968. ‘Banque grecque et banque romaine dans le théâtre de Plaute et de Térence’, MEFRA 80: 461–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrieu, J. 1954. Le Dialogue antique: structure et présentation. ParisGoogle Scholar
Aresi, L. 2017. Nel giardino di Pomona. Le Metamorfosi di Ovidio e l’invenzione di una mitologia in terra d’Italia. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1993. ‘The addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean protreptic’, MD 31: 185–230Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. . 2004. ‘All things to all men: Philodemus’ model of therapy and the audience of De Morte’, in Fitzgerald, J.T., Obbink, D. and Holland, G.S. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World. Leiden. 15–54Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Bastianini, G. 2002. Posidippi Pellaei Quae Supersunt Omnia. MilanGoogle Scholar
Austin, N. 1994. Helen of Troy and her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. 1955. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. . 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ax, W. 1993. ‘Phaselus ille-Sabinus ille—Ein Beitrag zur neueren Diskussion um die Beziehung zwischen Texten’, in Ax, W. and Glei, R.F. (eds.), Literaturparodie in Antike und Mittelalter. Trier. 75–100Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1985. ‘A phantom marriage law’, Philologus 192: 82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. . 1972. ‘Ennius and his friends’, in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 17. Geneva. 149–208Google Scholar
Baehrens, E. 1885. Catulli Veronensis Liber. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Baines, B.J. 1996. ‘Girard’s doubles and Antony and Cleopatra’, in Wood (1996). 9–39Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. 1968. Rabelais and his World, tr. H. Iswolsky. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T.W. 1944. William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke, 2 vols. Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
Bang, P.F. 2008. The Roman Bazaar: A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2012. ‘Pliny’s epistolary dreams and the ghost of Domitian’, TAPhA 142: 105–32Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C.S. 2013. ‘Intertextuality: introduction’, AJPh 134: 1–8Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1991. ‘Discordant Muses’, PCPhS 37: 1–21Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1993a. ‘Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2,1 e Ovidio, Tristia II’, MD 31: 149–84Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1993b. ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSPh 95: 333–65Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1994. Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. RomeGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1996. ‘Poetry, praise and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes’, ClAnt 15: 5–47Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. Translation of Barchiesi (1994)Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2000. ‘Rituals in ink: Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 167–82Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001a. ‘Some points on a map of shipwrecks’, in Fox, M. and Marchesi, S. (trs. and eds.), Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London. 141–54Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001b. ‘Horace and iambos: the poet as literary historian’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 141–64Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002a. ‘The uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and its tradition’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 107–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002b. ‘Martial arts. Mars Ultor in the Forum Augustum. A verbal monument with a vengeance’, in Herbert-Brown, G. (ed.), Ovid’s Fasti: Historical Readings at its Bimillennium. Oxford. 1–22Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2005. ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 320–42Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2008. ‘Senatus consultum de Lycaone: Concili degli dèi e immaginazione politica nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, MD 61: 117–45Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. 1962. Nevio epico: Storia, interpretazione, edizione critica dei frammenti del primo epos latino. PaduaGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, M. . 1970. ‘Plauto e il “metateatro” antico’, Il Verri 31: 113–30Google Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. . 2001. ‘What did Shakespeare read?’, in de Grazia, M. and Wells, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare. Cambridge. 31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, C.T. 1978. Bankers, Moneylenders, and Interest Rates in the Roman Republic. Diss., University of North Carolina-Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 1991. Talking it Over. LondonGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T.D. 1998. ‘Tacitus and the Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre’, Phoenix 52: 125–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsby, J. 1995. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus as improvisatory drama’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995). 55–70Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1957. Mythologies. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1968. ‘L’effet de réel’, Communications 11: 84–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1972. Mythologies, tr. A. Lavers. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1975. Le Plaisir du texte. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1978. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments, tr. R. Howard. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. . 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Batstone, W.W. 1993. ‘Logic, rhetoric, and poesis’, Helios 20: 143–72Google Scholar
Batstone, W.W. . 1998. ‘Dry pumice and the programmatic language of Catullus 1’, CPh 93: 125–35Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1987. ‘A complex of times: no more sheep on Romulus’ birthday’, PCPhS 33: 1–15Google Scholar
Beard, M. . 1991. Review of Scheid (1990), TLS (25 October 1991), 7Google Scholar
Bekker, E.I. 1861. Loci Plautini de Rebus Creditis. GreifswaldGoogle Scholar
Bellandi, F. 2007. Lepos e pathos: studi su Catullo. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels: Festgabe für Eckard Lefèvre zum 60. Geburtstag. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Berry, D.H. 1996. Cicero: Pro P. Sulla Oratio. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul, tr. J. van Sickle. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. . 2000. Le orecchie di Hermes: studi di antropologia e letterature classiche. TurinGoogle Scholar
Bickerman, E.J. 1980. Chronology of the Ancient World2. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. GöttingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. . 2005. ‘The politics and poetics of geography in the Milan Posidippus, Section One: on stones (AB 1–20)’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 119–40Google Scholar
Birt, T. 1882. Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Bishop, J.D. 1971. ‘Catullus 85: structure, hellenistic parallels and the topos’, Latomus 30: 633–42Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1983. ‘Remarks on Nicanor, the Stoics, and the ancient theory of punctuation’, Glotta 61: 48–67Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. 1982. ‘Die Komödienintrige als Spiel im Spiel’, A&A 28: 131–54Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. 1999. ‘The empty tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past’, ClAnt 18: 187–226Google Scholar
Blondell, R. 2013. Helen of Troy: Beauty, Myth, Devastation. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, M. 1997. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia, PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollème, G. (ed.). 1963. Extraits de le correspondance, ou, Préface à la vie d’écrivain: Gustave Flaubert. ParisGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. 1957–8. P. Ovidius Naso: Die Fasten, 2 vols. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. . 1988. ‘Über das zeitliche Verhältnis zwischen den Fasten und den Metamorphosen Ovids’, Gymnasium 95: 207–21Google Scholar
Bonime, F. and Eckardt, M.H. 1993. ‘On psychoanalysing literary characters’, in Berman, E. (ed.), Essential Papers on Literature and Psychoanalysis. New York and London. 202–16Google Scholar
Bonner, S.F. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, W.C. 1979. ‘Metaphor as rhetoric: the problem of evaluation’, in Sacks (1979). 47–80Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. 1986. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E.L. . 2011. ‘Alcman’s first Partheneion and the song the Sirens sang’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin. 33–65Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K. and Thomas, J.D. 1994. The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II). LondonGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. 2004. Juvenal and Persius. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. . 2006. ‘A tale of two cities: Statius, Thebes, and Rome’, Phoenix 60: 259–73Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. 1962. ‘Horace and Varro’, in Brink, C.O. (ed.), Varron, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 9. Geneva. 175–206Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1971. Horace on Poetry: The ‘Ars Poetica’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1982. Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, J. 1973. A Commentary on Livy Books XXXI–XXXIII. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Brodersen, K. (ed.) and Veh, O. (tr.). 1987. Appian von Alexandria. Römische Geschichte, vol. 1. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Brown, E.L. 1963. Numeri Vergiliani: Studies in Eclogues and Georgics. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.D. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura 4.1030–1287. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Brugnoli, G. and Scarcia, R. 1987. ‘Numerologia’, Enciclopedia Virgiliana 3: 790–3Google Scholar
Brunner, T. 1966. ‘The function of the simile in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, CJ 61: 354–63Google Scholar
Brunt, P.A. 1971. Italian Manpower 225 BC–AD 14. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1959. ‘Catulls Dichterkritik in c. 36’, Hermes 87: 309–27Google Scholar
Buck, C.H. 1940. A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.). 2018. Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffière, F. 1962. Allégories d’Homère: Héraclite. ParisGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. 1979. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Burnett, A.P. 1983. Three Archaic Poets: Archilochus, Alcaeus, Sappho. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Buxton, R.G.A. 1982. Persuasion in Greek Tragedy: A Study of Peitho. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1969. ‘Catullus 1’, Mnemosyne 22: 153–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. . 1971. ‘Five “religious” odes of Horace’, AJPh 92: 433–52Google Scholar
Cairns, F. . 1972. Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, R. 1990. ‘The psychoanalytic interpretation of Greek myth’, in Edmunds, L. (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth. Baltimore, MD. 344–89Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1995. Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.A. 1982. Greek Lyric I: Sappho and Alcaeus. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.A. . 1983. The Golden Lyre: The Themes of the Greek Lyric Poets. LondonGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.A. . 1992. Greek Lyric IV: Bacchylides, Corinna, and Others. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Cantor, P.A. 1976. Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Carey, C. 1999. ‘Ethos and Pathos in Bacchylides’, in Pfeijffer, I.L. and Slings, S.R. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Bacchylides. Amsterdam. 17–29Google Scholar
Carter, J. 1996. Appian. The Civil Wars. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Castle, T. 1986. Masquerade and Civilization: The Carnivalesque in Eighteenth-Century English Culture and Fiction. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Castner, C.J. 1988. Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, G. 1983. Libri scritture scribi a Ercolano: Introduzione allo studio dei materiali greci. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, G. . 1999. ‘Between Volumen and Codex’, in Cavallo, G. and Chartier, R. (eds.), A History of Reading in the West, tr. L. G. Cochrane. Amherst, MA. 64–89Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.). 2001. Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. 1984. Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction. Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, J. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. 1975. M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Liber Primus. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. . 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forme della comunicazione letteraria. RomeGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. . 2005. ‘Orazio, Cicerone, e il tempo della letteratura’, in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Heidelberg. 123–39Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 2000. Amicizia e potere: nelle lettere di Cicerone e nelle elegie ovidiane dall’esilio. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Citti, F. 1994. Orazio. L’invito a Torquato, Epist. 1,5. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento. BariGoogle Scholar
Claes, P. 2002. Concatenatio Catulliana: A New Reading of the Carmina. AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W. 1994. Virgil: Eclogues. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1983. Il foro romano, periodo arcaico. RomeGoogle Scholar
Colaclides, P. 1981. ‘Odi et amo: une lecture linguistique du c.LXXXV de Catulle’, in Kresic, S. (ed.), Contemporary Literary Hermeneutics and Interpretation of Classical Texts. Ottawa: 227–33Google Scholar
Coleman, K.M. 1981. ‘The persona of Catullus’ Phaselus’, G&R 28: 68–72Google Scholar
Commager, S. 1962. The Odes of Horace: A Critical Study. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Connors, C. 2004. ‘Monkey business: imitation, authenticity, and identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’, ClAnt 23: 179–207Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trs. varii, ed. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, tr. G.W. Most. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 2005. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis. Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Contiades-Tsitsoni, E. 1990. Hymenaios und Epithalamion. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D.E. 1986. Metaphor. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Copley, F.O. 1951. ‘Catullus, c.I’, TAPhA 82: 200–6Google Scholar
Corbett, P.B. 1986. The Scurra. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). LondonGoogle Scholar
Costa, C.D.N. 1973. Seneca: Medea. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. 1985. ‘Three poems of Catullus: (1) Poem 62 and its Greek background’, BICS 32: 85–8Google Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1995. Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1997. ‘Catullus’ yacht (or was it?)’, CJ 92: 113–22Google Scholar
Crews, F. 1993. ‘The unknown Freud’, NYRB (18 November 1993), 55–66Google Scholar
Crews, F. . 1994. ‘The unknown Freud: an exchange’, NYRB (3 February 1994): 34–43Google Scholar
Crews, F. . 1995. The Memory Wars: Freud’s Legacy in Dispute. Frederick Crews and his Critics. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Crook, J.A. 1996. ‘Political history, 30 B.C. to A.D. 14’, CAH 10.70–112Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra Epodi e Sermones. PisaGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. 1980. ‘Prolegomena to a theory of reading’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 46–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, B. 2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalby, A. 1998. ‘Homer’s enemies: lyric and epic in the seventh century’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Archaic Greece: New Approaches and New Evidence. London. 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.I. 1982. ‘Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?’, Ethology and Sociobiology 3: 69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damschen, G. 2004. ‘Das lateinische Akrostikon’, Philologus 148: 88–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daube, D. 1951. ‘Ne quid infamandi causa fiat: the Roman law of defamation’, in Atti del congresso internazionale di diritto romano e di storia del diritto, 1948. Milan: III.411–50Google Scholar
Davis, G. 1991. Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.T. 1971. ‘Poetic Counterpoint: Catullus 72’, AJPh 92: 196–201Google Scholar
Deighton, L. 1978. Bomber. LondonGoogle Scholar
Delcourt, A. 2001. ‘Évandre à Rome. Réflexions autour de quatre interprétations de la légende’, Latomus 60: 829–63Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1977. Catullo: le poesie. MilanGoogle Scholar
Dench, E. 1995. From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M. 1981. L’Invention de la mythologie. ParisGoogle Scholar
Di Brazzano, S. 1999. ‘Cacata charta: nota a Catull. 36, 1, e a Priap. 69, 4’, MD 43: 179–89Google Scholar
Dingel, J. 1997. Kommentar zum 9. Buch der Aeneis Vergils. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Dinnage, R. 1993. ‘Bringing up Raja’, NYRB (16 December 1993), 66–8Google Scholar
Döpp, S. 1968. Virgilischer Einfluss im Werk Ovids. MunichGoogle Scholar
Dornseiff-Greifswald, F. 1936. ‘Ägyptische Liebeslieder, Hoheslied, Sappho, Theokrit’, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 90: 589–601Google Scholar
Douglas, A.E. 1966. Cicero: Brutus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dover, K.J. 1971. Theocritus: Select Poems. LondonGoogle Scholar
Due, O.S. 1974. Changing Forms: Studies in the Metamorphoses of Ovid. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, N. 1995. Aristophanes: Birds. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, K. and van Dorsten, J. (eds.). 1973. Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidney. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dupont, F. 1976. ‘Signification théâtrale du double dans l’Amphitryon de Plaute’, REL 54: 129–41Google Scholar
Dupont, F. . 1997. ‘Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Princeton, NJ. 44–59Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I.M.LeM. 1984. ‘Horace and Maecenas: the propaganda value of Sermones I’, in Woodman and West (1984). 19–58Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. ‘Callimachus Iamb 4: from performance to writing’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 77–98Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M.J. 1992. ‘Apples, blood and flowers: Sapphic bridal imagery in Catullus’, in Leroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI. Brussels. 181–203Google Scholar
Edwards, M.W. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume V: books 17–20. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effe, B. 1978. ‘Die Destruktion der Tradition: Theokrits mythologische Gedichte’, RhM 121: 48–77Google Scholar
Ehlers, W.-W. 1990. ‘Zur Rezitation der Satiren des Persius’, in Kullmann, W. (ed.), Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur. Tübingen. 171–81Google Scholar
Eidinow, J.S.C. 1995. ‘Horace’s Epistle to Torquatus (Ep. 1.5)’, CQ 45: 191–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 1889. A Commentary on Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Empson, W. 1935. Some Versions of Pastoral. LondonGoogle Scholar
Estré, I.G.F. 1846. Horatiana Prosopographeia. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Fain, G.L. 2008. Writing Epigrams: The Art of Composition in Catullus, Callimachus and Martial. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. 1983. ‘Sexual comedy in Ovid’s Fasti: sources and motivations’, HSPh 87: 185–216Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1985. ‘Ovid, Germanicus and the composition of the Fasti’, PLLS 5: 243–81Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1992. ‘The role of Evander in Ovid’s Fasti’, Arethusa 25: 155–71Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1996. Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1998. Ovid: Fasti Book IV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 2010. ‘Discordia fratrum: aspects of Lucan’s conception of civil war’, in Breed, B., Damon, D. and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars. Oxford. 207–19Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2002. ‘Aetiology (in Greek literature)’, Brill’s New Pauly 1.271–4Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Färber, H. 1936. Die Lyrik in der Kunsttheorie der Antike. MunichGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2001. Latin Language and Latin Literature: From Ancient to Modern Times. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2009. ‘The impermanent text in Catullus and other Roman poets’, in W.A. Johnson and Parker (2009). 164–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauth, W. 1978. ‘Römische Religion im Spiegel der Fasti des Ovid’, ANRW 2.16.1: 104–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. 1983. Catullus’ Carmen 61, tr. M. Nardella. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. and Ciccarelli, I. 2008. Q. Horatii Flacci: Carmina Liber IV. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1994. Review of White (1993), BMCR 94.06.16Google Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2003. Review of Depew and Obbink (2000), JRS 93: 337–9Google Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2017. Review of Wiseman (2015), Gnomon 89: 412–18Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2002. ‘Metamorphosis in the Metamorphoses’, in P. Hardie (2002c). 163–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2007. ‘The intellectual climate’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA. 92–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2011. Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, S. 1982. ‘Turning the screw of interpretation’, in Felman, S. (ed.), Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Question of Reading: Otherwise. Baltimore, MD. 94–207Google Scholar
Felperin, H. 1990. The Uses of the Canon: Elizabethan Literature and Contemporary Theory. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2010. Sappho’s Gift: The Poet and her Community, trs. B. Acosta-Hughes and L. Prauscello. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Finley, M.I. 1973. The Ancient Economy. LondonGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. 1967. Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1988. ‘Power and impotence in Horace’s Epodes’, Ramus 17: 176–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. . 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. . 2000. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flexner, A. 2017. The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge, with a Companion Essay by Robbert Dijkgraaf. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Flower, H.I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Focke, F. 1923. ‘Synkrisis’, Hermes 58: 327–68Google Scholar
Foley, H.P. 1978. ‘“Reverse similes” and sex roles in the Odyssey’, Arethusa 11: 7–26Google Scholar
Foley, H.P. . 1985. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca, NY and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontenrose, J.E. 1937. ‘Peirithoos’, RE 19.1: 114–39Google Scholar
Foote, S. 1958–74. The Civil War, a Narrative, 3 vols. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Forbes Irving, P.M.C. 1992. Metamorphosis in Greek Myths. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 1991. ‘Unity in Greek criticism and poetry’, Arion, 3rd ser. 1: 125–54Google Scholar
Fordyce, C.J. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. 1989. Review of R.F. Thomas (1988), G&R 36: 235–6Google Scholar
Fowler, D. . 1995. ‘Horace and the aesthetics of politics’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 248–66Google Scholar
Fowler, D. . 2000. Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, P. 1997. ‘Lucretian conclusions’, in Roberts, D.H., Dunn, F.M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ. 112–38Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. 1987. The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. TorontoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2004. ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R.L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 220–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2006. ‘How to tell a myth: genealogy, mythology, mythography’, Kernos 19 [online]Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2012. ‘Written work’, TLS (16 March 2012), 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2014. ‘The death of Neoptolemos’, in Reitz and Walter (2014). 79–104Google Scholar
Fox, M. 2019. ‘The prehistory of the Roman polis in Dionysius’, in Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. (eds.), Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Cambridge. 180–200Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1921. Die homerischen Gleichnisse. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1955. ‘Vesper adest (Catullus LXII)’, JRS 45: 1–8Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. . 1957. Horace. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Frangoulidis, S.A. 1997. Handlung und Nebenhandlung: Theater, Metatheater und Gattungsbewusstsein in der römischen Komödie. StuttgartCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, T. 1914. ‘A rejected poem and a substitute: Catullus LXVIII A and B’, AJPh 35: 67–73Google Scholar
Frank, T. . 1920. ‘Catullus and Horace on Suffenus and Alfenus’, CQ 14: 160–2Google Scholar
Frassinetti, P. 1975. Gli Annali di Ennio: inquadramento e versione dei frammenti. GenoaGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J.G. 1913. The Golden Bough. Vol. 9. The Scapegoat3. LondonGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. . 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. . 2002. ‘Writing to/through Florus: criticism and the addressee in Horace Epistles 2.2’, Amer. Acad. Rome 47: 33–55Google Scholar
Friedrich, G. 1908. Catulli Veronensis Liber. Leipzig and BerlinGoogle Scholar
Führer, R. 1967. Formproblem-Untersuchungen zu den Reden in der frühgriechischen Lyrik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Fuller, C.J. 1992. The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gaar, E. and Schuster, M. 1930. Auswahl aus römischen Dichtern zur Ergänzung der Vergil- und Horazlektüre. ViennaGoogle Scholar
Gabba, E. 1958. Appian, Bellorum Civilium, Liber Primus. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J.H. 1993. Catullus and his Renaissance Readers. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. 1975. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. . 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. 2006. ‘The rise of fictionality’, in Moretti, F. (ed.), The Novel. Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture. Princeton, NJ. 336–63Google Scholar
Gamberale, L. 1982. ‘Libri e letteratura nel carme 22 di Catullo’, MD 8: 143–60Google Scholar
Garner, R. 1990. From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1992. The Architext: An Introduction, tr. J.E. Lewin. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gentili, B. 1988. Poetry and its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, tr. A.T. Cole. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Geymonat, M. 1985. ‘Interpunzione’, Enciclopedia Virgiliana 2.998–1000Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1968. ‘Sympotic literature and epigram’, in Raubitschek, A.E. (ed.), L’Epigramme grecque, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 14. Geneva. 93–177Google Scholar
Gibson, R.K. 2007. Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. 2004. ‘Ovid’s Hecale: Deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses’, JRS 94: 47–72Google Scholar
Glinski, M.L. von. 2012. Simile and Identity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J. 1995. Catullus: Poems 61–68. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J. . 1999. Catullus: The Shorter Poems. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Gold, B.K. 1992. ‘Openings in Horace’s Satires and Odes; poet, patron, and audience’, YClS 29: 161–85Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. 1995a. Epic in Republican Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. . 1995b. ‘Improvisation, plot, and Plautus’ Curculio’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995). 33–42.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. . 1998. ‘Plautus on the Palatine’, JRS 88: 1–20Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1986. Reading Greek Tragedy. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1994a. ‘The failure of exemplarity’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1994b. ‘The naïve and knowing eye: ecphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge. 197–223Google Scholar
Gomme, A.W. and Sandbach, F.H. 1973. Menander: A Commentary. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goold, G.P. 1983. Catullus. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J.S. and Gordon, A.E. 1957. Contribution to the Study of Latin Inscriptions. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. . 2009. ‘The ends of the beginning: Horace, Satires I’, in Houghton and Wyke (2009). 39–60.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. . 2012. Horace: Satires Book 1. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A.M. 1992. The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A.M. . 2013. ‘Tully’s boat: responses to Cicero in the imperial period’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge. 233–50Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1988. ‘Ovide, les Métamorphoses et la véracité du mythe’, in Calame, C. (ed.), Métamorphoses du mythe en Grèce antique. Geneva. 57–70Google Scholar
Graf, F. . 1992. ‘Römische Aitia und ihre Riten. Das Beispiel von Saturnalia und Parilia’. MH 49: 13–25Google Scholar
Gransden, K.W. 1976. Virgil: Aeneid Book 8. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Grant, M.A. and Fiske, G.C. 1924. ‘Cicero’s Orator and Horace’s Ars Poetica’, HSPh 35: 1–74Google Scholar
Grant, M.A. and Fiske, G.C. . 1929. Cicero’s De Oratore and Horace’s Ars Poetica. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. 1982. ‘Drama’, CHCL 2.77–137Google Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. . 1991. ‘Catullus 1.10 and the title of his libellus’, G&R 38: 199–202Google Scholar
Graves, R. 1957. Suetonius: The Twelve Caesars. LondonGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2009. ‘Horace, Suetonius, and the Lives of the Greek poets’, in Houghton and Wyke (2009). 140–60Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2009. ‘Greek lyric and early Greek literary history’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge. 95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S.J. 2004. Ovid, Fasti 1: A Commentary. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1984. ‘Augustus and the poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 189–218Google Scholar
Griffin, J. . 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. LondonGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. . 1993. ‘Horace in the thirties’, in Rudd (1993). 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J.G. 1983. ‘Catullus, Poem 4: a neglected interpretation revived’, Phoenix 37: 123–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. 1983. Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A. 1972. ‘Alcman’s Partheneion: the morning after the night before’, QUCC 14: 7–30Google Scholar
Gross, K. 2006. Shylock is Shakespeare. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E.S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. 1984. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. . 1993. Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CTGoogle ScholarPubMed
Günther, L.-M. 1989. ‘Hannibal im Exil’, in Devijver, H. and Lipinski, E. (eds.), Studia Phoenica X: The Punic Wars. Leiden. 241–50Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2002. ‘Art’s echo: the tradition of Hellenistic ecphrastic epigram’, in Harder, A., Regtuit, R. and Wakker, G. (eds.), Hellenistic Epigrams. Leiden. 85–112Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. . (ed.). 2005. The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. 1985. The Colometry of Latin Prose. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. . 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. . 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hague, R. 1983. ‘Ancient Greek wedding songs: the tradition of praise’, Journal of Folklore Research 20: 131–43Google Scholar
Hall, E. 2008. ‘Is the “Barcelona Alcestis” a Latin pantomime libretto?’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford. 258–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J.B. 1982. Review of Alton-Wormell-Courtney (ed. 1, 1978), PACA 16: 68–76Google Scholar
Hallett, J.P. 1993. ‘Plautine ingredients in the performance of the Pseudolus’, CW 87: 21–6Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 1986. Aristotle’s Poetics. LondonGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1987. The Poetics of Aristotle: Translation and Commentary. LondonGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1989. Review of Heath (1987), JHS 109: 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1992. ‘Pleasure, understanding, and emotion in Aristotle’s Poetics’, in Rorty, A.O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton, NJ. 241–60Google Scholar
Halperin, D.M. 1990. One Hundred Years of Sexuality, and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D.B. 1990. Virgil and “The Tempest”: The Politics of Imitation. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Hampton, C. 1983. Tales from Hollywood. London and Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
Harder, A. 2012. Callimachus: Aetia. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. 1998. ‘Horace, the paean and Roman choreia (Odes 4.6)’, PLLS 10: 251–93Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1991. ‘The Janus episode in Ovid’s Fasti’, MD 26: 47–64Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993a. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993b. ‘Vt pictura poesis? Horace and the visual arts’, in Rudd (1993). 120–39Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2002a. ‘Another look at Virgil’s Ganymede’, in Wiseman, T.P. (ed.), Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. London. 333–61Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2002b. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. (ed.). 2002c. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2015. Ovidio: Metamorfosi. Volume VI (Libri XIII–XV). MilanGoogle Scholar
Harmon, D.P. 1970. ‘Catullus 72.3–4’, CJ 65: 321–2Google Scholar
Harrauer, H. 1979. A Bibliography to Catullus. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Harries, B. 1989. ‘Causation and the authority of the poet in Ovid’s Fasti’, CQ 39: 164–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, B. . 1991. ‘Ovid and the Fabii: Fasti 2.193–474’, CQ 41: 150–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, K. 1979. ‘Metaphor and transcendence’, in Sacks (1979). 71–88Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. 2006. ‘A revisionist view of Roman money’, JRS 96: 1–24Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. . (ed.). 2008. The Monetary Systems of the Greeks and Romans. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, B. 1991. Inconvenient Fictions: Literature and the Limits of Theory. New Haven, CTCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E.L. 1984. ‘The Aeneid and Carthage’, in Woodman and West (1984). 95–115Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. 1990. ‘The praise singer: Horace, Censorinus and Odes 4.8’, JRS 80: 31–43Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . (ed.). 1995. Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 2008. ‘Horace Epistles 2: the last Horatian book of Sermones?’, PLLS 13: 173–86Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. and Heyworth, S.J. 1998. ‘Notes on the text and interpretation of Catullus’, PCPhS 44: 85–109Google Scholar
Hartz, C. 2007. Catulls Epigramme im Kontext hellenistischer Dichtung. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R.A. 1981. A Commentary on Persius. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haupt, M. 1837. Quaestiones Catullianae. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. 1987. The Poetics of Greek Tragedy. LondonGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. . 1988. ‘Catullus 68B’, LCM 13: 117–19Google Scholar
Heath, M. . 1989. Unity in Greek Poetics. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. 1960. Vom Geist des Römertums: Ausgewählte Aufsätze3, ed. Burck, E.. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Helzle, M. 1989. Publii Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber IV: A Commentary on Poems 1 to 7 and 16. Zürich and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1991. ‘Persius’ didactic satire: the pupil as teacher’, Ramus 20: 123–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 1999. Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 2001. Telling Tales on Caesar: Roman Stories from Phaedrus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henry, J. 1873–92. Aeneidea, 4 vols. Dublin and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hersch, K. 2010. The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Herter, H. 1934. ‘Telemachos’, RE 2R 9: 325–57Google Scholar
Heslin, P. 2005. The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ Achilleid. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslin, P. . 2011. ‘Metapoetic pseudonyms in Horace, Propertius and Ovid’, JRS 101: 51–72Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. 1994. ‘Some allusions to Callimachus in Latin poetry’, MD 33: 51–79Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2001. ‘Catullian Iambics, Catullian Iambi’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 117–40Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2007a. Properti Elegi. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2007b. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Highet, G. 1949. The Classical Tradition: Greek and Roman Influences on Western Literature. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. 1985. ‘Booking the return trip: Ovid and Tristia 1’, PCPhS 31: 13–32Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987a. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987b. ‘Generalising about Ovid’, Ramus 16: 4–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1992. ‘Arma in Ovid’s Fasti—Part I: Genre and Mannerism; Part II: Genre, Romulean Rome and Augustan Ideology’, Arethusa 25: 81–153Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2006. ‘Venus, Varro and the vates: towards the limits of etymologizing interpretation’, Dictynna 3: 173–208Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2010. ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford. 369–85Google Scholar
Hodgman, W. 1924. ‘Latin equivalents of punctuation marks’, CJ 19: 403–17Google Scholar
Hofmann, J.B. and Szantyr, A. 1965. Lateinische Grammatik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Hollander, D.B. 2007. Money in the Late Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A.S. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry c.60 BC–AD 20. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Holoka, J.P. 1985. Gaius Valerius Catullus: A Systematic Bibliography. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2000. ‘Lesbia, the poet, and the two faces of Sappho: “Womanufacture” in Catullus’, PCPhS 46: 28–44Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. . 2002a. Martial und das antike Epigramm. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. . 2002b. Catull: Der Dichter und sein erotisches Werk. MunichGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. . 2014. Vergil: 3. Aeneis. Eine Bibliographie. MunichGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, K. . 1991. ‘From violence to blessing: symbols and rituals in ancient Rome’, in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. and Emlen, J. (eds.), City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy. Ann Arbor, MI. 479–98Google Scholar
Hordern, J.H. 2002. The Fragments of Timotheus of Miletus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, R.A. 1963. ‘The craft of Catullus (carm. 4)’, AJPh 84: 256–65Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. 1976. ‘The Collegium Poetarum’, BICS 23: 79–95Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1983. ‘Some problems in the “Laudatio Turiae”’, BICS 30: 85–98Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1989. Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1993. ‘Empty shelves on the Palatine’, G&R 40: 58–67Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2003a. The Culture of the Roman Plebs. LondonGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2003b. Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, S. 2004. Das Epithalamium in der lateinischen Literatur der Spätantike. MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höschele, R. 2013. ‘From Ecloga the Mime to Vergil’s Eclogues as Mimes: Ein Gedankenspiel’, Vergilius 59: 37–60Google Scholar
Houghton, L. and Wyke, M. (eds.). 2009. Perceptions of Horace: A Poet and his Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Housman, A.E. 1972. The Classical Papers of A.E. Housman, eds. Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F.R.D.. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Houston, G.W. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill, NCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, P. 1980. A Commentary on Book One of the Epigrams of Martial. LondonGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. 1973. ‘The Odes’, in Horace, ed. Costa, C.D.N.. London. 1–28Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1974. Propertius. LondonGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1975. ‘The capture of Silenus’, PCPhS n.s. 21: 53–62Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1995. ‘Pindarici fontis qui non expalluit haustus: Horace, Epistles I.3’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 219–27Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1984. ‘Catullus 68: the text as self-demystification’, Arethusa 17: 29–49Google Scholar
Hunter, G.K. 1977. ‘A Roman thought: Renaissance attitudes to history exemplified in Shakespeare and Jonson’, in Lee, B.S. (ed.), An English Miscellany: Presented to W.S. Mackie. Cape Town, London and New York. 93–118Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1985. ‘Horace on friendship and free speech: Epistles 1.18 and Satires 1.4’, Hermes 113: 480–90Google Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1992. ‘Writing the god: form and meaning in Callimachus, Hymn to Athena’, MD 29: 9–34Google Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. . 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.). 2017. Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2002. ‘The new Posidippus and Latin poetry’, ZPE 138: 1–10Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2003. ‘The Aetia: Callimachus’ poem of knowledge’, ZPE 145: 47–59Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2010. ‘Deflected addresses: apostrophe and space (Sophocles, Aeschines, Plautus, Cicero, Virgil and others)’, CQ 60: 96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2012. ‘Booking lovers: desire and design in Catullus’, in Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Cambridge. 48–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks & Contexts for Intertextuality. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2010. A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia 2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. 2006. ‘Commentario al Libro X’, in Quinto Ennio, Annali (Libri IX-XVIII): Commentari. Naples. 141–282Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 2010. ‘From Sallust to Silius Italicus: metus hostilis and the fall of Rome in the Punica’, in Miller and Woodman (2010). 123–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, J.-M. 1960. ‘Sur un acrostiche d’Aratos’, REA 62: 48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jal, P. 1963. La Guerre civile à Rome: étude littéraire et morale. ParisGoogle Scholar
Janan, M. 1994. ‘When the Lamp is Shattered’: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale and Edwardsville, ILGoogle Scholar
Jansen, L. (ed.). 2014. The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jebb, R.C. 1905. Bacchylides: The Poems and Fragments. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, T.E. 2005. ‘At play with writing: letters and readers in Plautus’, TAPhA 135: 359–92Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1982. Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal. LondonGoogle Scholar
Jenott, L. 2010. The Gospel of Judas: Coptic Text, Translation, and Historical Interpretation of the ‘Betrayer’s Gospel’. Diss. Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H.D. 1979. ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus Vita Vergilii 44)’, PLLS 2: 67–142Google Scholar
Johnson, T.S. 2004. A Symposion of Praise: Horace Returns to Lyric in Odes IV. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.A. 2009. ‘The ancient book’, in Bagnall, R.S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford. 256–81Google Scholar
Johnson, W.A. and Parker, H.N. (eds.). 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. 1982. The Idea of Lyric: Lyric Modes in Ancient and Modern Poetry. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. . 1993. Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles 1. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. 1971. Scenic Form in Shakespeare. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. . 1977. The Origins of Shakespeare. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jong, I.J.F. de and Sullivan, J.P. (eds.). 1994. Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. 1999. The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero. LondonGoogle Scholar
Karlin, D. 1993. Review of Parkes (1993), LRB (7 January 1993), 15Google Scholar
Kaster, R.A. 1995. Suetonius: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kaster, R.A. . 2011. Macrobius: Saturnalia. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. and Spelman, H. (eds.). forthcoming. Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S.T. 1982. ‘The shackles of forgetfulness: Horace, C., 4, 7’, Latomus 41: 815–16Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. 1987. Review of H.-P. Stahl, Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’ (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1985), LCM 12: 72–7Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1989. Review of Hinds (1987a) and Knox (1986), JRS 79: 209–10Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1992. ‘“Augustan” and “anti-Augustan”: reflections on terms of reference’, in A. Powell (1992). 26–58Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1993. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. 1989a. ‘Ancient antecedents of modern literary theory’, AJPh 110: 492–8Google Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. . 1989b. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. 1: Classical Criticism. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. . 1991. ‘Heath on Unity and Daitz’s Living Voice’, AJPh 112: 115–18Google Scholar
Kenner, H. 1968. The Counterfeiters: An Historical Comedy. Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. 1971. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura Book III. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. . 1982. ‘Books and readers in the Roman world’, CHCL 2.3–32Google Scholar
Kerkhecker, A. 1999. Callimachus’ Book of Iambi. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kermode, F. 1983. Essays on Fiction: 1971–82. LondonGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan, J. 1986. Shakespeare: The Sonnets; and, A Lover’s Complaint. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. 1997. Aratus: Phaenomena. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, A. 1868. ‘Zur Kritik und Erklärung des Plautinischen Pseudolus’, RhM 23: 411–26Google Scholar
Kiessling, A., rev. Heinze, R. 1921. Q. Horatius Flaccus: Satiren5. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E.F. 1987. Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1950a. Horatius: Opera. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. . 1950b. ‘Horazens Brief an Augustus’, SBAW, Heft 5. MunichGoogle Scholar
Kloft, H. 1984. ‘Aspekte der Prinzipatsideologie im frühen Prinzipat’, Gymnasium 91: 306–26Google Scholar
Knauer, G.N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Knox, P.E. 1986. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Knox, P.E. and Foss, C. (eds.). 1998. Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart and LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Kohn, T. 1998. ‘Aeneid 6. 713–23: who is speaking?’, Vergilius 44: 28–30Google Scholar
Kolendo, J. 1981. ‘La répartition des places aux spectacles et la stratification sociale dans l’Empire Romain: à propos des inscriptions sur les gradins des amphithéâtres et théâtres’, Ktèma 6: 301–15Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.). 2013. Ancient Libraries. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, D. 2009. ‘Horace, Pindar and the Censorini in Odes 4.8’, JRS 99: 23–35Google Scholar
Kramer, L.S. 1989. ‘Literature, criticism, and historical imagination: the literary challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra’, in Hunt, L. (ed.), The New Cultural History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 97–128Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. 1994. Livy: Ab Urbe Condita. Book VI. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1998. ‘Repetition and empire in the Ab Urbe Condita’, in Knox and Foss (1998). 264–83Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. and Woodman, A.J. 1997. Latin Historians. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kroll, W. 1924. Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Kroll, W. . 1959. Catull3. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Krostenko, B.A. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre3, rev. A. Thierfelder. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1938. ‘Hat Linkomies’ Auffassung der vierten Ekloge wirklich dem Räselraten eine Ende bereitet?’, PhW 58: 812–16Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1999. Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, A. 2005. ‘Cabinet fit for a queen: the λιθικά as Posidippus’ gem museum’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 141–63Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1963. Orazio e l’ideologia del principato. TurinGoogle Scholar
La Penna, A. . 1972. ‘Sunt qui Sappho malint. Note sulla σύγκρισις di Saffo e Alceo nell’antichità’, Maia 24: 208–15Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1981. Orazio: Satire. MilanGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. . 1984. L’arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell’ elegia ovidiana. PisaGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. . 2005. ‘Poetica minore e minima: Mecenate e gli amici nelle Satire di Orazio’, MD 54: 47–63Google Scholar
Labate, M. . 2010. Passato remoto: età mitiche e identità augustea in Ovidio. PisaGoogle Scholar
Lada, I. 1993. ‘“Empathic understanding”: emotion and cognition in classical dramatic audience-response’, PCPhS 39: 94–140Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1993. ‘Sounding out ekphrasis: art and text in Catullus 64’, JRS 83: 18–30Google Scholar
Lambert, A. 1946. Die indirekte Rede als künstlerisches Stilmittel des Livius. ZürichGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M. 1981. Dickens and the Suspended Quotation. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1997. ‘Plutarch and the Romanizations of Athens’, in Hoff, M.C. and Rotroff, S.I. (eds.), The Romanizations of Athens. Oxford. 151–60Google Scholar
Langdon, M.K. 2015. ‘Herders’ graffiti’, in Matthaiou, A.P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), AXON: Studies in Honor of Ronald S. Stroud. Athens. 49–58Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2008. ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: the case of seueritas’, CCJ 54: 160–87Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. 2001. ‘Keening Sappho: female speech genres in Sappho’s poetry’, in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.), Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton, NJ. 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latta, B. 1972. ‘Zu Catulls Carmen 1’, MH 29: 201–13Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1960. Römische Religionsgeschichte. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. 1961. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. . 1967. The Odyssey of Homer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1990. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft3. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, M. 1982. Das Einzeldistichon: Studien zum antiken Epigramm. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lawson, E.T. and McCauley, R.N. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, J.F. 1978. Hannibal’s War: A Military History of the Second Punic War. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. 1990. The Poems of Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1977. ‘Plautus-Studien I, der doppelte Geldkreislauf im Pseudolus’, Hermes 105: 441–54Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1988. ‘Die grosse Florus-Epistel des Horaz (2.2). Der Schwanengesang der augusteischen Dichtung’, in Binder, G. (ed.), Saeculum Augustum II. Darmstadt. 342–59Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1997. Plautus’ Pseudolus. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Leigh, M. 1997. Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Leo, F. 1901. Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Lesky, A. 1966. A History of Greek Literature, trs. J. Willis and C. de Heer. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. 2010. Livy on the Hannibalic War. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libby, B. 2010. ‘Poetic and imperial authority in Phaedrus’ Fables’, CQ 60: 545–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1958. ‘L’ordinamento ed i reciproci rapporti dei carmi maggiori di Catullo’, RFIC 86: 23–47Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. . 1962. Puella divina. Die Gestalt der göttlichen Geliebten bei Catull im Zusammenhang der antiken Dichtung. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. 1979. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. . 1985. Review of Price (1984), JRS 75: 262–4Google Scholar
Lipovsky, J. 1981. A Historiographical Study of Livy, Books VI–X. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1987. Un Flot d’images: une esthétique du banquet grec. ParisGoogle Scholar
Litchfield, H.W. 1914. ‘National Exempla Virtutis in Roman literature’, HSPh 25: 1–71Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. 2002. ‘Integer ipse? Self-knowledge and self-presentation in Persius Satires 4’, Phoenix 56: 56–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. 1975. ‘Ovid’s Lupercalia (Fasti 2.267–452): a study in the artistry of the Fasti’, Latomus 34: 1060–72Google Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. . 1981. ‘Poetic artistry and dynastic politics: Ovid at the Ludi Megalenses (Fasti 4.179–372)’, CQ 31: 381–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. . 2006. A Commentary on Ovid’s Fasti, Book 6. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. (ed.). 2003. Credito e moneta nel mondo romano. Atti degli Incontri capresi di storia dell’economia antica (Capri 12–14 ottobre 2000). BariGoogle Scholar
Loehr, J. 1996. Ovids Mehrfacherklärungen in der Tradition aitiologischen Dichtens. StuttgartCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G.M. 1976. ‘Lucan—Daniel—Shakespeare: new light on the relation between The Civil Wars and Richard II’, Shakespeare Studies 9: 121–40Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. 2007. ‘Catullus and Martial’, in Skinner, M.B (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton. 418–38Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2010. ‘Cannibalising history: Livian moments in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Miller and Woodman (2010). 71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J.C.B. 1962. ‘The manuscript evidence for changes of speaker in Aristophanes’, BICS 9: 27–42Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 1997. Horace’s Narrative Odes. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2002. ‘Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the poet statesman at Epistles 2.1.256’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 158–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2006. ‘Hic and absence in Catullus 68’, CPh 101: 115–32Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, T.J. 1990. ‘Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum’, in Raaflaub, K.A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 123–38Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1990. ‘The origin and development of the Catullan style in Neo-Latin poetry’, in Godman, P. and Murray, O. (eds.), Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition: Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Oxford. 183–97Google Scholar
Lundstrom, S. 1980. Ovids Metamorphosen und die Politik des Kaisers. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Lupton, E. (ed.). 1998. Period Styles: A History of Punctuation2. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2001. ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford. 138–60Google Scholar
Lyghounis, M.G. 1991. ‘Elementi tradizionali nella poesia nuziale greca’, MD 27: 159–98Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. 1980. The Latin Love Poets from Catullus to Horace. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 2007. Collected Papers on Latin Poetry. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCabe, C. 1988. ‘Language, linguistics and the study of literature’, in Lodge, D. (ed.), Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. London and New York. 432–44Google Scholar
McCall, M.H. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, M.W. 1910. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and their Background. London and MelbourneGoogle Scholar
McDermott, E.A. 1981. ‘Greek and Roman elements in Horace’s lyric program’, ANRW 2.31.3: 1640–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintyre, A. 1970. ‘The idea of a social science’, in Wilson, B.R. (ed.), Rationality. Oxford. 112–30Google Scholar
McKeon, M. 1987. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
McKeown, J.C. 1984. ‘Fabula proposito nulla tegenda meo: Ovid’s Fasti and Augustan politics’, in Woodman and West (1984). 169–87Google Scholar
McKeown, J.C. . 1987. Ovid: Amores. Vol. 1. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C.W. 1974. ‘A use of myth in ancient poetry’, CQ 24: 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C.W. . 1982. Homer: Iliad XXIV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
McNamee, K. 1992. Sigla and Select Marginalia in Greek Literary Papyri. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
McNeill, R.B. 2001. Horace: Image, Identity and Audience. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Maehler, H. 1982. Die Lieder des Bakchylides, I: Die Siegeslieder, 2 vols. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine, H.S. 1861. Ancient Law, in Connection with the Early History of Society, and its Relation to Modern Ideas. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. LeedsGoogle Scholar
Mangelsdorff, E.A. 1913. Das lyrische Hochzeitsgedicht bei den Griechen und Römern. HamburgGoogle Scholar
Mankin, D. 1995. Horace: Epodes. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrou, H.I. 1956. A History of Education in Antiquity, tr. G. Lamb. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C.W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. 1985. ‘A reconsideration of Ovid’s Fasti’, ICS 10: 261–74Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1998. Aratos: Phénomènes. ParisGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993a. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. . 1993b. ‘Descent into hell: reading ambiguity, or Virgil and the critics’, PVS 21: 111–50Google Scholar
Martindale, C. . 2004. ‘Shakespeare and Virgil’, in Martindale, C. and Taylor, A.B. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge. 89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. and Martindale, M. 1990. Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity: An Introductory Essay. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
May, J.M. 1990. ‘The monologistic dialog as a method of literary criticism’, Athenaeum 78: 177–80Google Scholar
Mayer, R. 1994. Horace: Epistles Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. . 1995a. ‘Graecia capta: the Roman reception of Greek literature’, PLLS 8: 289–307Google Scholar
Mayer, R. . 1995b. ‘Horace’s Moyen de Parvenir’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 279–95Google Scholar
Meltzer, F. 1990. ‘Unconscious’, in Lentricchia, F. and McLaughlin, T. (eds.), Critical Terms for Literary Study. Chicago, IL. 147–63Google Scholar
Merli, E. 2000. Arma canant alii: Materia epica e narrazione elegiaca nei fasti di Ovidio. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Mette, H.J. 1962. ‘Catull Carm. 4’, RhM 105: 153–7Google Scholar
Meyer, E.A. 2001. ‘Wooden wit: tabellae in Latin poetry’, in Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-Five Years at Yale. New Haven, CT. 201–12Google Scholar
Meyer, E.A. . 2004. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalopoulos, A.N. 1999. ‘Etymologising on common nouns in Catullus’, Emerita 67: 127–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, G.B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Millar, F. 1977. The Emperor in the Roman World (31 BC–AD 337). Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. 1985. Ovid, Fasti II. Bryn Mawr, PAGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1991. Ovid’s Elegiac Festivals. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1992. ‘The Fasti and Hellenistic didactic: Ovid’s variant aetiologies’, Arethusa 25: 11–31Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1993. ‘Ovidian Allusion and the Vocabulary of Memory’, MD 30: 153–64Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 2009. Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.). 2010. Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P.A. 1994. Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J.F. 1966. ‘The Torquati’, Historia 15: 23–31Google Scholar
Moeller, P. 1912. Deos consiliantes qua ratione Lucilius in libro primo aliique effinxerint. Diss. WeimarGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. 1993. ‘Livy’s Preface’, PCPhS 39: 141–68Google Scholar
Moles, J. . 2002a. ‘Poetry, philosophy, politics and play: Epistles I’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 141–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. . 2002b. ‘Reconstructing Plancus (Horace, C. 1.7)’, JRS 92: 86–109Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1942. Review of L. Robinson, Freedom of Speech in the Roman Republic (Baltimore, MD, 1940), JRS 32: 120–4Google Scholar
Moore, T.J. 1998. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J.R. 1993. ‘Make-believe and make believe: the fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter. 175–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L. 2010. Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Muecke, F. 1986. ‘Plautus and the theater of disguise’, ClAnt 5: 216–29Google Scholar
Muecke, F. . 1993. Horace: Satires II. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Muecke, F. . 1995. ‘Law, rhetoric, and genre in Horace, Satires 2.1’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 203–18Google Scholar
Müller, R.W. 1964. Rhetorische und syntaktische Interpunktion. Untersuchungen zur Pausenbezeichnung im antiken Latein. Diss. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Münzer, F. 1905. ‘Atticus als Geschichtsschreiber’, Hermes 40: 50–100Google Scholar
Münzer, F. . 1928. ‘Manlius’, RE 14.1: 1149–226Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1985. ‘Symposium and genre in the poetry of Horace’, JRS 75: 39–50Google Scholar
Myers, K.S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MICrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, K.S. . 2009. Ovid: Metamorphoses Book XIV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R.A.B. 1958. C. Valerii Catulli Carmina. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nagle, B.R. 1980. The Poetics of Exile: Program and Polemic in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto of Ovid. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Nappa, C. 2001. Aspects of Catullus’ Social Fiction. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Nauta, R.R. 1994. ‘Historicizing reading: the aesthetics of reception and Horace’s “Soracte Ode”’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 207–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, R. 1972. Belief, Language and Experience. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Neudling, C.L. 1955. A Prosopography to Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. 1992. ‘Ovid’s narrator in the Fasti’, Arethusa 25: 33–54Google Scholar
Newlands, C. . 1995. Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. . 2002. ‘Mandati Memores: political and poetic authority in the Fasti’, in P. Hardie (2002c). 200–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J.K. 1967a. Augustus and the New Poetry. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Newman, J.K. . 1967b. The Concept of Vates in Augustan Poetry. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Newman, J.K. . 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Newsom, R. 1988. A Likely Story: Probability and Play in Fiction. New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. 1961. Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 1987. ‘Pyrrha among roses: real life and poetic imagination in Augustan Rome’, review of Griffin (1985), JRS 77: 184–90Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 1995. Collected Papers on Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S.J.. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 2002. ‘A wine-jar for Messalla: Carmina 3.21’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 2007. ‘Horace: life and chronology’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge. 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hubbard, M. 1970. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book 1. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hubbard, M. . 1978. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Rudd, N. 2004. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Norden, E. 1927. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis Buch VI3. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
North, J.A. 2008. ‘Caesar at the Lupercalia’, JRS 98: 144–60Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. . 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oakley, J.H. and Sinos, R.H. 1993. The Wedding in Ancient Athens. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. Volume II: Books VII and VIII. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. . 2005. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. Volume IV: Book X. OxfordGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. 1996. ‘Vergil’s best reader? Ovidian commentary on Vergilian etymological wordplay’, CJ 91: 255–76Google Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. . 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1991. ‘Canidia, Canicula, and the decorum of Horace’s Epodes’, Arethusa 24: 107–38Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 1995. ‘Life after publication: Horace, Epistles 1.20’, Arethusa 28: 209–24Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 2009. Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, K. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. Abingdon and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Önnerfors, A. 1974. Vaterporträts in der römischen Poesie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Horaz, Statius und Ausonius. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Otis, B. 1963. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Otto, A. 1890. Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Page, D. 1955. Sappho and Alcaeus: An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Page, D. . 1962. Poetae Melici Graeci. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. 1879. ‘On Ellis’s Catullus’, Hermathena 3: 293–363Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. 2007. ‘Sexuality and ritual: Catullus’ wedding poems’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Oxford. 276–92Google Scholar
Paoli, U.E. 1932. ‘Note di filologia reale su Catullo, Orazio, Marziale’, SIFC 10: 33–7Google Scholar
Paratore, E. 1963. ‘Osservazioni sui rapporti fra Catullo e gli epigrammisti dell’ «Antologia»’, in Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di Augusto Rostagni. Turin: 562–87Google Scholar
Parker, H.N. 2009. ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’, in W.A. Johnson and Parker (2009). 186–229Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2011. On Greek Religion. Ithaca, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, M.B. 1993. Pause and Effect: Punctuation in the West. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Parsons, P.J., Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hutchinson, G.O. 1983. ‘Alcestis in Barcelona’, ZPE 52: 31–6Google Scholar
Pasco-Pranger, M. 2006. Founding the Year: Ovid’s Fasti and the Poetics of the Roman Calendar. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Pascucci, G. 1961. ‘Il nome di Pseudolus’, A&R 6: 30–4Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. 1920. Orazio lirico. Florence (repr. 1964)Google Scholar
Paukstadt, R. 1876. De Martiale Catulli Imitatore. Diss. HalleGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2018. ‘Fidelity and farewell: Pindar’s ethics as textual events’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018). 257–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, A.S. 1935. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Pederson, J. 1984. The Arabic Book, tr. G. French. Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedrick, V. 1986. ‘Qui potis est, inquis? Audience roles in Catullus’, Arethusa 19: 187–209Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. 1988. Plutarch: Life of Antony. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R . 2009. ‘Seeing a Roman tragedy through Greek eyes: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar’, in Hall, E. and Goldhill, S. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Tragic Tradition. Cambridge. 264–88Google Scholar
Perkins, D. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Perowne, S. 1968. Roman Mythology. LondonGoogle Scholar
Petrain, D. 2005. ‘Gems, metapoetics, and value: Greek and Roman responses to a third-century discourse on precious stones’, TAPhA 135: 329–57Google Scholar
Petrochilos, N.K. 1974. Roman Attitudes to the Greeks. AthensGoogle Scholar
Petrone, G. 1983. Teatro antico e inganno: finzione plautine. PalermoGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pfeijffer, I.L. 2004. ‘Pindar and Bacchylides’, in de Jong, I.J.F., Nunlist, R. and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Leiden. 213–32Google Scholar
Phillips, C.R. 1983. ‘Rethinking Augustan poetry’, Latomus 42: 780–818Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2006. ‘Making an impression: replication and the ontology of the Graeco-Roman seal stone’, Art History 29: 233–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podlecki, A.J. 1969. ‘The Peripatetics as literary critics’, Phoenix 23: 114–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, M. 2008. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, IL and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, D. 1985. L’Étiologie religieuse dans les Fastes d’Ovide. ParisGoogle Scholar
Porter, D. 1972. ‘Violent juxtaposition in the similes of the Iliad’, CJ 68: 11–21Google Scholar
Possanza, D.M. 2004. Translating the Heavens: Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. (ed.). 1992. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. BristolGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. . 2008. Virgil the Partisan: A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. and Welch, K. (eds.). 2002. Sextus Pompeius. Swansea and LondonGoogle Scholar
Powell, B.B. 2002. Writing and the Origins of Greek Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. 1988. Cicero: Cato Maior De Senectute. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. . 1990. Cicero: On Friendship and the Dream of Scipio. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Price, S.R.F. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Price, S.R.F. . 1990. ‘The future of dreams: from Freud to Artemidoros’, in Halperin, D.M., Winkler, J.J. and Zeitlin, F.I. (eds.), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton, NJ. 365–87Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1995. ‘On the sacking of Carthage and Corinth’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford. 133–48Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. 1968. ‘Catullus 22, 13’, Hermes 96: 552–8Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 2006. ‘Horace to Torquatus: Epistle 1.5 and Ode 4.7’, AJPh 127: 387–413Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. . 2006. ‘The tragedy of nobility on the seventeenth-century stage’, Modern Language Quarterly 67: 7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. . 2008. William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rafti, P. 1988. ‘L’interpunzione nel libro manoscritto: mezzo secolo di studi’, S&C 12: 239–98Google Scholar
Ramage, E.S. 1973. Urbanitas: Ancient Sophistication and Refinement. Norman, OKGoogle Scholar
Rawles, R. 2018. Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. . 1991. ‘Discrimina ordinum: the lex Julia theatralis’, in Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers, 508–45. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ready, J.L. 2004. ‘A binding song: the similes of Catullus 61’, CPh 99: 153–63Google Scholar
Reardon, B.P. (ed.). 1989. Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Reden, S. von. 1995. Exchange in Ancient Greece. LondonGoogle Scholar
Reed, J.D. 2013. Ovidio: Metamorfosi. Volume V (Libri X–XII). MilanGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.D. 1995. ‘Conclusion’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M.D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Spoleto. 497–511Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. 2002. ‘The speech of Nature in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura 3.931–71’, CQ 52: 291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, M. 1933. M. Agrippa. Geneva, NYGoogle Scholar
Reitz, C. and Walter, A. (eds.). 2014. Von Ursachen sprechen. Eine aitiologische Spurensuche/Telling Origins. On the Lookout for Aetiology. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. 1963. Aufsätze zu Horaz. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L.D. and Wilson, N.G. 1974. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.H. 2012. The Fabii and the Gauls: Studies in Historical Thought and Historiography in Republican Rome. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.S. 1995. ‘The Roman mind and the power of fiction’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformations of Classical Traditions Presented to Professor I. G. Kidd. New Brunswick, NJ. 117–30Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. 1985. ‘Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity’, PLLS 5: 383–401Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. . 1994. ‘Aristotle and Hellenistic scholarship’, in Montanari, F. (ed.), La Philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 40. Geneva. 7–28Google Scholar
Ricks, C. 1963. Milton’s Grand Style. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language, tr. R. Czerny. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. 2007. Ion, or, On the Iliad: Plato. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. 2011. A Commentary on Ovid’s Fasti, Book 2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Robson, A.G. 1972. ‘Catullus 68:53: the coherence and force of tradition’, TAPhA 103: 433–9Google Scholar
Robson, J. 2007. ‘Catullus 22: Suffenus iste—a Catullan riddle?’, C&M 58: 209–14Google Scholar
Roca-Puig, R. 1982. Alcestis. Hexàmetres Llatins. Papyri Barcinonenses, Inv. n.° 158–161. BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
Roman, L. 2001. ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91: 113–45Google Scholar
Roman, L. . 2006. ‘A history of lost tablets’, ClAnt 25: 351–88Google Scholar
Ronan, C.J. 1988. ‘Lucan and the self-incised voids of Julius Caesar’, Comparative Drama 22: 215–26Google Scholar
Rosebury, B. 1988. Art and Desire: A Study in the Aesthetics of Fiction. New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R.M. 2000. ‘Cratinus’ Pytine and the construction of the comic self’, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. London. 23–39Google Scholar
Rosen, R.M. . 2007. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T.G. 1969. The Green Cabinet: Theocritus and the European Pastoral Lyric. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Rösler, W. 1980. ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica 12: 283–319Google Scholar
Ross, D.O. Jr. 1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D.O. . 1975. Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C.J. 1987. ‘Platonic irony’, Noua Tellus 5: 83–101Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1966. The Satires of Horace. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1976. Lines of Enquiry: Studies in Latin Literature. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1982. ‘Horace’, CHCL 2: 370–404Google Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1989. Horace Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.). 1993. Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium. BristolGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. 2002. ‘A total write-off: Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the rhetoric of comic competition’, CQ 52: 138–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1967. ‘Rhetoric and criticism’, G&R n.s. 14: 130–44Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1979. ‘De Imitatione’, in West, D. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 1–16Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. LondonGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1989. The Place of Poetry in Ancient Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. and Winterbottom, M. 1989. Classical Literary Criticism2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ruthven, K.K. 1969. The Conceit. LondonGoogle Scholar
Ruthven, K.K. . 1979. Critical Assumptions. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Sacks, S. (ed.). 1979. On Metaphor. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Saenger, P. 1997. Space Between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Sage, V. 1988. Horror Fiction in the Protestant Tradition. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, R. 2005. ‘Framing the debate over growth in the ancient economy’, in Manning, J.G. and Morris, I. (eds.), The Ancient Economy: Evidence and Models. Stanford, CA. 223–38Google Scholar
Salzman, M. 1998. ‘Deification in the Fasti and the Metamorphoses’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 9. Brussels. 313–46Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. 1995. ‘Horace and Augustan ideology’, Arethusa 28: 225–43Google Scholar
Sarkissian, J. 1983. Catullus 68. An Interpretation. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpat, G. 1964. Parrhesia. Storia del termine e delle sue traduzioni in latino. BresciaGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, E. 1966. Das Verhältnis von Erlebnis und Kunstgestalt bei Catull. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Schanzer, E. 1956. Shakespeare’s Appian: A Selection from the Tudor Translation of Appian’s Civil Wars. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. 1990. Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. RomeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. . 1992. ‘Myth, cult and reality in Ovid’s Fasti’, PCPhS 38: 118–31Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2009a. ‘Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective’, in Morris, I. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Dynamics of Ancient Empires: State Power from Assyria to Byzantium. Oxford. 255–324Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. . 2009b. ‘When did Livy write Books 1, 3, 28 and 59?’, CQ 59: 653–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2005. ‘Under the sign of Saturn: Dido’s Kulturkampf’, in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Heidelberg. 85–110Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech: Horace’s Satires, Book 1, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Schmeling, G.L. 1980. Xenophon of Ephesus. Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. 1972. Poetische Reflexion: Vergils Bukolik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. . 1977. ‘Amica uis pastoribus: der Iambiker Horaz in seinem Epodenbuch’, Gymnasium 84: 401–23Google Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. . 1991. Ovids poetische Menschenwelt: Die Metamorphosen als Metapher und Symphonie. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, K. 1902. ‘Griechische Personennamen bei Plautus’, Hermes 37: 353–90Google Scholar
Schnurr, C. 1992. ‘The lex Julia theatralis of Augustus: some remarks on seating problems in theatre, amphitheatre and circus’, LCM 17: 147–60Google Scholar
Schrenk, L.P. 1994. ‘Sappho Frag. 44 and the “Iliad”’, Hermes 122: 144–50Google Scholar
Schwabe, L. 1862. Quaestiones Catullianae. GiessenGoogle Scholar
Schwindt, J.P. 2000. Prolegomena zu einer ‘Phänomenologie’ der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. GöttingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. 2005. Review of I.J.F. de Jong, R. Nunlist and A. Bowie (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative (Leiden, 2004), BMCR 2005.07.48Google Scholar
Scotti, M. 1982. ‘I “canoni” degli autori greci’, Esperienze letterarie 7: 74–91Google Scholar
Scullard, H.H. 1981. Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 1986. ‘Wedding ritual and textual criticism in Sophocles’ “Women of Trachis”’, Hermes 114: 50–9Google Scholar
Seaford, R. . 1987. ‘The tragic wedding’, JHS 107: 106–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. . 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seelbach, W. 1963. ‘Zu lateinischen Dichtern (Catull c. 4, Horaz c. I 28, Lupus von Aquincum’, RhM 106: 348–51Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1992. ‘Boundaries, worlds, and analogical thinking, or How Lucretius learned to love atomism and still write poetry’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt. 137–56, with ‘Discussion’, 170–5Google Scholar
Selden, D.L. 1992. ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London. 461–512Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. 1975. ‘Un influsso ciceroniano in Virgilio’, SIFC 47: 5–26Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. . 1986. ‘Discorso diretto’, in Enc. Virg. 2.102–6Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. 1978. Cicero’s Letters to his Friends. LondonGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. . 2001. Horatius: Opera4. Munich and LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, H.A. 2005. ‘The judgment of Helen in Athenian art,’ in Barringer, J.M. and Hurwit, J.M. (eds.), Periklean Athens and its Legacy: Problems and Perspectives. Austin, TX. 47–62Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1996. ‘The art of deceit: Pseudolus and the nature of reading’, CQ 46: 152–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, A. . 2009. Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, M. 1978. The Economy of Literature. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Shell, M. . 1982. Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibles, W.A. 1971. Metaphor: An Annotated Bibliography and History. Whitewater, WIGoogle Scholar
Shipton, K.M.W. 1983. ‘A house in the city: Catullus 68.68’, Latomus 42: 869–76Google Scholar
Sider, D. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemos: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sider, D. . 2010. ‘Greek verse on a vase by Douris’, Hesperia 79: 541–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, E.T. 1952. ‘Notes on Cicero and the Odes of Horace’, YClS 13: 147–58Google Scholar
Silk, E.T. . 1956. ‘A fresh approach to Horace, II.20’, AJPh 77: 255–63Google Scholar
Silk, M.S. 1974. Interaction in Poetic Imagery with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M.B. 1993. ‘Catullus in performance’, CJ 89: 61–8Google Scholar
Skinner, M.B. . 2001. ‘Among those present: Catullus 44 and 10’, Helios 28: 57–73Google Scholar
Skinner, M.B. . 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1976. ‘Zur Überlieferung und zum Text Catulls’, Acta Philologica Aenipontana 3: 68–69Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. . 1985. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Slater, N.W. 1985. Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Slater, N.W. . 1993. ‘Improvisation in Plautus’, in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Beiträge zur mündlichen Kultur der Römer. Tübingen. 113–24Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. . 2002. Spectator Politics: Metatheater and Performance in Aristophanes. Philadelphia, PA