Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.362 Render date: 2021-10-22T19:51:47.770Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

10 - A survey on pollination modes in cacti and a potential key innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Sébastien Patiny
Affiliation:
Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Flower–pollinator interactions are among the most fascinating research areas in ecology. The ways in which such interactions evolve are influenced by a number of biotic and abiotic factors, such as habitat and climate, plant and animal morphology, phylogenetic background etc. The increasing amount of data on pollination ecology combined with more and more detailed and precise phylogenetic reconstructions based on (not only) molecular evidence, allows improvement of our understanding of how flower–pollinator relationships evolve. Plant lineages especially well-suited for the study of factors influencing the evolution of flower–pollinator interactions would contain pollination by various groups of pollinators, preferably both diurnal and nocturnal, including both vertebrates and invertebrates, and sufficient evolutionary shifts among pollination modes.

Cactaceae are ideal for this type of study for a number of reasons:

  1. manageable number of species

  2. great diversity of habitats

  3. diverse growth forms

  4. adaptation to several pollinator guilds, including bimodal and generalized pollination

  5. an increasingly solid phylogenetic base of data

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. F. 2001 The Cactus FamilyPortland, ORTimber PressGoogle Scholar
Arias, S.Terrazas, T.Cameron, K. M. 2003 Phylogenetic analysis of (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequencesSystematic Botany 28 547Google Scholar
Arias, S.Terrazas, T.Arreola-Nava, H. J.Vázquez-Sánchez, M.Cameron, K. M. 2005 Phylogenetic relationships in (Cactaceae) inferred from plastid DNA sequence dataJournal of Plant Research 118 317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, C. A.Wallace, R. S. 2004 Phylogenetic studies of (Cactaceae): insights from chloroplast sequence variation and hypothesis testing using the parametric bootstrapAmerican Journal of Botany 91 1086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castellanos, M. C.Wilson, P.Thomson, J. D. 2004 Anti-bee” and “pro-bird” changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in flowersJournal of Evolutionary Biology 17 876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, L.Cocucci, A. A. 2003 Functional gynodioecy in (Cactaceae), a tree cactus pollinated by bees and hummingbirdsPlant Biology 5 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, E. J.Nyffeler, R.Donoghue, M. J. 2005 Basal cactus phylogeny: implications of (Cactaceae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life formAmerican Journal of Botany 92 1177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, T. H.Holland, J. N. 1998 The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita mothOecologia 114 368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, T. H.Valiente-Banuet, A. 2002 Columnar Cacti and their Mutualists: Evolution, Ecology, and ConservationTucson, AZUniversity of Arizona Press
Fleming, T. H.Geiselman, C.Kress, W. J. 2009 The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspectiveAnnals of Botany 104 1017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, T. H.Sahley, C. T.Holland, J. N.Nason, J. D.Hamrick, J. L. 2001 Sonoran Desert columnar cacti and the evolution of generalized pollination systemsEcological Monographs 71 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geesink, R. 1969 An account of the genus in Indo–Australia and the Pacific (Portulacaceae)Blumea 17 274Google Scholar
Grant, V.Grant, K. A. 1979 The pollination spectrum in the southwestern American cactus floraPlant Systematics and Evolution 133 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M.P.Porter, J.M. 2009 Phylogeny of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae)International Journal of Plant Sciences 170 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, J. 1997 All the Birds of North AmericaLondon, UKHarper Collins PublishersGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, S.Nason, J. D.Bhattacharya, D. 2002 Phylogenetic origins of (Cactaceae) and the Senita cactus: Senita moth pollination mutualismAmerican Journal of Botany 89 1085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helversen, D. v.Holderied, M. W.Helversen, O. v. 2003 Echoes of bat-pollinated, bell-shaped flowers: conspicuous for nectar-feeding bats?Journal of Experimental Biology 206 1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, S. A. 1997 Floral nectar spurs and diversificationInternational Journal of Plant Sciences 158 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, D.Taylor, N.Charles, G. 2006 The New Cactus LexiconMilborne Port, UKDH BooksGoogle Scholar
Kim, I.Carr, G. D. 1990 Reproductive biology and uniform culture of in HawaiiPacific Science 44 123Google Scholar
Korotkova, N.Zabel, L.Quandt, D.Barthlott, W. 2010 A phylogenetic analysis of and the reinstatement of as an independently evolved lineage of epiphytic Cactaceae within a new tribe LymanbensonieaeWilldenowia 40 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuenberger, B. 1986 (Cactaceae)Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 41 1Google Scholar
Locatelli, E.Machado, I. C. S. 1999 Comparative study of the floral biology in two ornithophilous species of Cactaceae: and Bradleya 17 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locatelli, E.Machado, I. C. S. 1999 Floral biology of : a sphingophilous cactus of restingaBradleya 17 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombello, R. A.Pinto-Maglio, C. A. F. 2009
Michener, C. D. 2000 The Bees of the WorldBaltimore, MDJohns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Mogford, D. J. 1980 Colour discrimination in the pollination of HookJournal of South African Botany 46 121Google Scholar
Nassar, J. M.Ramírez, N.Lampo, M.González, J. A.Casado, R.Navaz, F. 2007 Reproductive biology and mating system estimates of two Andean Melocacti, and (Cactaceae)Annals of Botany 99 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyffeler, R.Eggli, U. 2010 Disintegrating Portulacaceae: a new familial classification of the suborder Portulacineae (Caryophyllales) based on molecular and morphological dataTaxon 59 227Google Scholar
Nyffeler, R.Eggli, U. 2010 A farewell to dated ideas and concepts: molecular phylogenetics and a revised suprageneric classification of the family CactaceaeSchumannia 6 109Google Scholar
Ollerton, J.Johnson, S. D.Hingston, A. B. 2006 Plant–Pollinator Interactions: from Specialization to GeneralizationWaser, N. M.Ollerton, J.Chicago, MIUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Pellmyr, O. 2003 Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a reviewAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perret, M.Chautems, A.Spichiger, R.Kite, G.Savolainen, V. 2003 Systematics and evolution of tribe Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae): evidence from phylogenetic analyses of six plastid DNA regions and nuclear ncpGSAmerican Journal of Botany 90 445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raguso, R. A.Henzel, C.Buchmann, S. L.Nabhan, G. P. 2003 Trumpet flowers of the Sonoran desert: floral biology of cacti and Sacred International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes-Agüero, J. A.Aguirre, J. R.Valiente-Banuet, A. 2006 Reproductive biology of : a reviewJournal of Arid Environments 64 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roig-Alsina, A.Schlumpberger, B. O. 2008 The cactus-specialist bees of the genus Hedicke (Hymenoptera, Colletidae): notes on host associations and description of a new speciesJournal of the Kansas Entomological Society 81 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahley, C. T. 1996 Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, (Cactaceae)American Journal of Botany 83 1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazima, W. R.Sazima, M. 1995 Hawkmoth pollination in , a columnar cactus from southeastern BrazilFlora 190 339Google Scholar
Schlindwein, C.Wittmann, D. 1997 Stamen movements in flowers of (Cactaceae) favour oligolectic pollinatorsPlant Systematics and Evolution 204 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumpberger, B. O.Badano, E. I. 2005 Diversity of floral visitors to ssp. (Cactaceae)Haseltonia 11 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumpberger, B. O.Raguso, R. A. 2008 Geographic variation in floral scent of (Cactaceae); evidence for constraints on hawkmoth attractionOikos 117 801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumpberger, B. O.Cocucci, A. A.Moré, M.Sérsic, A. N.Raguso, R. A. 2009 Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactusAnnals of Botany 103 1489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreiber, H. 1978 Dispersal centres of Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) in the neotropical regionBiogeographica 10 1Google Scholar
Simpson, B. B.Neff, J. L. 1987 Pollination ecology in the arid SouthwestAliso 11 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, E. A.Manos, P. S. 2008 Is floral specialization an evolutionary dead-end? Pollination system transitions in (Acanthaceae)Evolution 62 1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschapka, M.Helversen, O. v.Barthlott, W. 2008 Bat pollination of , an epiphytic rain forest cactus with functional flagellifloryPlant Biology 1 554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valerio, R.Ramírez, N. 2003 Depresión exogámica y biología reproductiva de (Jacq.) Gaertner (Portulacaceae)Acta Botánica Venezuelica 26 111Google Scholar
Valiente-Banuet, A.Arizmendi, M. C.Rojas-Martinez, A.Dominguez-Canseco, L. 1996 Ecological relationships between columnar cacti and nectar feeding bats in MéxicoJournal Tropicla Ecology 12 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vengris, J.Dunn, S.Stacewicz-Sapuncakis, M. 1972 Life history studies as related to weed control in the northeast. 7. Common purslaneMassachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 598 1Google Scholar
Walter, H. 2010 Floral biology of ssp. (Cactaceae): evidence for a mixed pollination syndromeFlora 210 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P.Castellanos, M. C.Hogue, J. N.Thomson, J. D.Armbruster, W. S. 2004 A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemonsOikos 104 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, A. D.Randle, C. P.Datwyler, S. L.Morawetz, J. J.Argueas, N.Diaz, J. 2006 Phylogeny, taxonomic affinities, and biogeography of (Plantaginaceae) based on ITS and cpDNA sequence dataAmerican Journal of Botany 93 1699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×