Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Evaluating Scientific Evidence
- Introduction
- 1 Triers of science
- 2 What is intellectual due process?
- 3 A framework of analysis
- 4 Toxic torts and the causation conundrum
- 5 Criminal identification evidence
- 6 Future dangerousness testimony: The epistemology of prediction
- 7 Barefoot or Daubert? A cognitive perspective on vetting future dangerousness testimony
- 8 Future dangerousness and sexual offenders
- 9 Models of rationality: Evaluating social psychology
- 10 Evaluating battered woman syndrome
- Conclusion
- Index
- The Law in Context Series
The Law in Context Series
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 December 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Evaluating Scientific Evidence
- Introduction
- 1 Triers of science
- 2 What is intellectual due process?
- 3 A framework of analysis
- 4 Toxic torts and the causation conundrum
- 5 Criminal identification evidence
- 6 Future dangerousness testimony: The epistemology of prediction
- 7 Barefoot or Daubert? A cognitive perspective on vetting future dangerousness testimony
- 8 Future dangerousness and sexual offenders
- 9 Models of rationality: Evaluating social psychology
- 10 Evaluating battered woman syndrome
- Conclusion
- Index
- The Law in Context Series
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Evaluating Scientific EvidenceAn Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process, pp. 255Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006