Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-q9r9l Total loading time: 2.057 Render date: 2022-07-04T13:38:25.998Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2020

Markus W. Gehring
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Europe's Second Constitution
Crisis, Courts and Community
, pp. 311 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, K., ‘On Reading and Using the Tenth Amendment’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A., ‘A Generation of Betrayal?’ (1996–97) 65 Fordham Law Review 1519.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A.Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law’ (1989) 99 Yale Law Journal 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Cambridge, MA 2010).Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A.The Emergency Constitution’ (2004) 113 Yale Law Journal 1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of Presidential Democracy (Cambridge, MA 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. The Future of Liberal Revolution (New Haven, CT 1992).Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A.The Holmes Lectures: The Living Constitution’ (2007) 120(7) Harvard Law Review 1737.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A.The Rise of World Constitutionalism’ (1996) 83 Virginia Law Review 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A.Three Paths to Constitutionalism – and the Crisis of the European Union’ (2015) 45 British Journal of Political Science 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. We the People: Vol. 1: Foundations (Cambridge, MA 1991).Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. We the People: Vol. 2: Transformations (Cambridge, MA 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. We the People: Vol. 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Cambridge, MA 2014).Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A. and Charney, R. E., ‘Canada at the Constitutional Crossroads’ (1984) 34 University of Toronto Law Journal 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, L., ‘Tenth Amendment: The United States’ Defining Compromise’ (2019) 20(1) Federalism-E 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, J. and Möllers, C., ‘Unification of Laws in the Federal System of Germany’ in Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M. (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, Vol. 28 of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (Berlin/Heidelberg 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, S. and van Elsuwege, P., ‘Citizenship Rights and the Federal Balance between the European Union and Its Member States: Comment on Dereci’ (2012) 37(2) European Law Review 176.Google Scholar
Ahlstrom, S. E. and Hall, D. D., A Religious History of the American People (New Haven, CT 2004).Google Scholar
Albors-Llorens, A., ‘A Broader Construction of the EC Treaty Provisions on Citizenship?’ (1998) 57 Cambridge Law Journal 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albors-Llorens, A., ‘The Direct Effect of EU Directives: Fresh Controversy or a Storm in a Teacup? Comment on Portgas’ (2014) 39(6) European Law Review 851.Google Scholar
Alemanno, A., ‘Unpacking the Principle of Openness in EU Law: Transparency, Participation and Democracy’ (2014) 39 European Law Review 72.Google Scholar
Alen, A. and Muylle, K., Compendium van het Belgisch staatsrecht, Diegem (The Hague 2004).Google Scholar
Alleman, R. and Mazzone, J., ‘The Case for Returning Politicians to the Supreme Court’ (2010) 61 Hastings Law Journal 1353.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J., The European Court’s Political Power: Selected Essays (Oxford 2009).Google Scholar
Alter, K. J., ‘The Global Spread of European Style International Courts’ (2012) 35(1) West European Politics 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K. J., ‘Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”? European Governments and the European Court of Justice’ (1998) 52 International Organization 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, K., European Criminal Law (Cambridge 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amirfar, C. and Singh, A., ‘The Trump Administration and the “Unmaking” of International Agreements’ (2018) 59 Harvard International Law Journal 443.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. K. and di Palma, G. (eds.), Restructuring Territoriality: Europe and the United States Compared (Cambridge 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, S. T., Legal and Historical Aspects of the Militia (New Haven, CT 1917).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arden, Rt Hon. Lady Justice, ‘Peaceful or Problematic? The Relationship between National Supreme Courts and Supranational Courts in Europe’ (2010) 29(1) Yearbook of European Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M., The Euro Crisis (Basingstoke 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnull, A., ‘A Constitutional Court for Europe?’ (2003–2004) 6 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnull, A., Barnard, C., Dougan, M. and Spaventa, E. (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood (Oxford/Portland, OR 2011).Google Scholar
Aroney, N. and Kincaid, J. (eds.), Federal Countries: Federalists or Unitarists (Toronto 2017).Google Scholar
Atik, J., ‘From No Bailout to the European Stability Mechanism’ (2015–2016) 39 Fordham International Law Journal 1201.Google Scholar
Auer, A., ‘The People Have Spoken: Abide? A Critical View of the EU’s Dramatic Referendum (In)Experience’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustin, A., Das Volk der Europäischen Union. Zu Inhalt und Kritik eines normativen Begriffs (Berlin 2000).Google Scholar
Aumaitre, A., ‘From the SGP to the TSCG through the Lenses of European Integration Theories’ (2018) Bruges Political Research Papers 67/2018, aei.pitt.edu/97356/1/wp67_aumaitre.pdf.Google Scholar
Awe, B. M., ‘Religion in the EU: Using Modified Public Reason to Define European Human Rights’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahlmann, K., ‘Europäische Grundrechtsperspektiven’ in Börner, B. and Carstens, K. (eds.), Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit – Festschrift für Karl Carstens zum 70 (Cologne 1984).Google Scholar
Bakke, K. M. and Wibbels, E., ‘Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States’ (2006) 59 World Politics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballas, D., Dorling, D. and Hennig, B., The Social Atlas of Europe (Bristol 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barager, J. R., Why Perón Came to Power: The Background to Peronism in Argentina (New York 1968).Google Scholar
Barber, N., Hickman, T. and King, J., ‘Pulling the Article 50 “Trigger”: Parliament’s Indispensable Role’, UK Constitution Law blog (27 June 2016), https://ukconstitutionallaw.org.Google Scholar
Barber, T., ‘Europe Must Confront Crisis of Legitimacy’ (23 April 2012), Financial Times, www.ft.com/content/4e2c793c-8d50-11e1-8b49-00144feab49a.Google Scholar
Baratta, R., ‘National Courts as “Guardians” and “Ordinary Courts” of EU Law: Opinion 1/09 of the ECJ’ (2011) 38(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 297.Google Scholar
Barbier, J.-C., ‘The Myth of English as a Common Language in the European Union (EU) and Some of Its Political Consequences’ in Gazzola, M., Templin, T. and Wickstrom, B.-A., Language Policy and Linguistic Justice: Economic, Philosophical and Sociolinguistic Approaches (Cham 2018).Google Scholar
Barnard, C., ‘Case C-209/03, R (on the application of Danny Bidar) v London Borough of Ealing, Secretary of State for Education and Skills, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 15 March 2005, not yet reported’ (2005) 42 Common Market Law Review 1465.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. EU Employment Law (Oxford 2012).Google Scholar
Barnard, C. The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms, 3rd ed. (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Barnard, C.Viking and Laval: An Introduction’ (2007–2008) 10 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. and de Vires, S., ‘The “Social Market Economy” in a (Heterogeneous) Social Europe: Does It Make a Difference?’ (2019) 15 Utrecht Law Review 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C., Gehring, M. and Solanke, I. (eds.), ‘The Advocate General: Securing Trust and Democracy in the EU Judicial Order’ (2011–2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 697.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. and Odudu, O., The Outer Limits of European Union Law (Oxford/Portland, OR 2009).Google Scholar
Barnard, C. and Peers, S., European Union Law (Oxford 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, J. M., ‘State of the Union 2012 Address’, Plenary Session of the European Parliament, Strasbourg, vol. 12 (2012).Google Scholar
Bassett, D. L., ‘Recusal and the Supreme Court’ (2005) 56 Hastings Law Journal 657.Google Scholar
BBC News, ‘Germany and France Vow to Strengthen Ties’, 22 September 2012, www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19684532.Google Scholar
BBC News, ‘MPs Back EU Arrest Warrant in Commons Motion Brought by Labour’, 19 November 2014, www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30118664.Google Scholar
Beaud, O., ‘Fédéralisme et souveraineté. Notes pour une théorie constitutionnelle de la Fédération’ (1998) 1 Revue du droit public 83.Google Scholar
Beblavý, M., Cobham, D. and Ódor, L. u., The Euro Area and the Financial Crisis (Cambridge 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, G., ‘Judicial Activism in the Court of Justice of the EU’ (2017) 36 University of Queensland Law Journal 333.Google Scholar
Beck, G., ‘The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice and the Euro Crisis: The Flexibility of the Court’s Cumulative Approach and the Pringle Case’ (2012) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, G., ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court, the Primacy of EU Law and the Problem of Kompetenz‐Kompetenz: A Conflict between Right and Right in Which There Is No Praetor’ (2011) 17 European law Journal 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J., ‘The Role of European Judges in an Era of Uncertainty’ in Birkinshaw, P. and Varney, M. (eds.), The European Union Legal Order after Lisbon (Alphen Aan Den Rijn 2010).Google Scholar
Bellamy, R., A Republican Europe of States: Cosmopolitanism, Intergovernmentalism and Democracy in the EU (Cambridge 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (ed.), Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives (Aldershot 1996).Google Scholar
Bergström, M. and Cornell, A. J., European Police and Criminal Law Co-operation (Oxford 2014).Google Scholar
Bermann, G. A., ‘Executive Power in the New European Constitution’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermann, G. A., ‘Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermann, G. A.The Role of Law in the Functioning of Federal Systems’ in Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R. (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford 2001).Google Scholar
Besselink, L. and Bonelli, M., ‘Back and Forth between Sovereignty and Constitutionalism: The Court of Justice’s Constitutional Case Law’ (2018) 14 European Constitutional Law Review 665.Google Scholar
Besselink, L. and Reestman, J. H., ‘The Fiscal Compact and the European Constitutions: “Europe Speaking German”’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Betten, L. and Grief, N., EU Law and Human Rights (Harlow 1998).Google Scholar
von Beyme, K., ‘Fischers Griffnacheiner EuropäischenVerfassung’ in Joerges, C., Mény, Y. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), What Kind of Constitution for What Kind of Policy? Responses to Joschka Fischer (Cambridge, MA 2000).Google Scholar
Bickel, A. M., The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Indianapolis, IN 1962).Google Scholar
Bickel, A. M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, 2nd ed. (New Haven, CT 1986).Google Scholar
Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (eds.), The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era (Oxford 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, R., ‘Verfassungsentwicklung und Verfassungsgebung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft’ in Wildenmann, R. (ed.), Staatswerdung Europas? Optionen für eine Europäische Union (Baden-Baden 1991).Google Scholar
Bilder, M. S., ‘The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review’ (2006) 116 Yale Law Journal 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biondi, A., Dagilytė, E. and Küçük, E., Solidarity in EU Law: Legal Principle in the Making (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, P. and Varney, M. (eds.), The European Union Legal Order after Lisbon (Alphen aan den Rijn 2010).Google Scholar
Bitsch, M.-T., Histoire de la construction européenne de 1945 à nos jours (Brussels 1999).Google Scholar
Blackett, A., ‘“This Is Hallowed Ground”: Canada and International Labour Law’ (2018) CIGI Papers No. 22, www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Reflections%20Series%20Paper%20no.22%20Blackett.pdf, 510.Google Scholar
Blanke, H.-J., ‘Der Unionsvertragvon Maastricht–EinSchrittaufdem Wegzueinem europäischen Bundesstaat’ (1993) Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 412.Google Scholar
Blokker, P., ‘Constitutional Mobilization and Contestation in the Transnational Sphere’ (2018) 45 Journal of Law and Society S52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A., ‘Solving the Financial and Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe’ (2012) 2011(2) OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends 201.Google Scholar
Bobek, M., Selecting Europe’s Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (Oxford 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, E., ‘Die Nation: Identität in Differenz’ (1995) Politische Wissenschaft 974.Google Scholar
Boerger, A. and Davies, B., ‘Imagining the Course of European Law?’ in Nicola, F. and Davies, B. (eds.), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence (Cambridge 2017).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., ‘The European Constitution and European Identity: Text and Subtext of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 295315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., ‘The European Union as a Human Rights Organization? Human Rights and the Core of the European Union’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 1307.Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A. and Bast, J. (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford/Portland, OR 2006).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A. and Krenn, C., ‘On the Democratic Legitimacy of Europe’s Judges’ in Bobek, M., Selecting Europe’s Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (Oxford 2015).Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V., ‘Legitimacy, Accountability and Democracy in the European Union’ (2007) Federal Trust Report.Google Scholar
Bonfield, L., ‘The Foreign Affairs’ Power of the European Union: All Hat and No Cattle?’ (2011) 20 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 123.Google Scholar
Borger, V., ‘The ESM and the European Court’s Predicament in Pringle’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A., ‘What Can Federalism Teach Us about the European Union? The German Experience’ (2005) 15 Regional and Federal Studies 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T., ‘A Litmus Test for European Integration Theories: Explaining Crises and Comparing Regionalisms’ (2018) KFG Working Paper 85, www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57753#.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, R. R. and Friedrich, C. J. (eds.), Studies in Federalism (Boston 1954).Google Scholar
Brando, N. and de Schutter, H., ‘Federal Commons’ in Cogolati, S. and Wouters, J. (eds.), The Commons and a New Global Governance (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Bräuninger, T. and König, T., ‘The Checks and Balances of Party Federalism: German Federal Government in a Divided Legislature’ (1999) 36 European Journal of Political Research 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, W. J. Jr., ‘State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights’ (1977) 90 Harvard Law Review 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer Carías, A.-R., Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study (New York 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, S., America’s Supreme Court: Making Democracy Work (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Breyer, S., ‘Changing Relationships among European Constitutional Courts’ (1999–2000) 21 Cardozo Law Review 1045.Google Scholar
Bright, C. and Harding, S. F. (eds.), Statemaking and Social Movements: Essays in History and Theory (Ann Arbor, MI 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, M. and Fenger, N., Preliminary References to the European Court (New York 2010).Google Scholar
Brown, L. and Kennedy, T., The Court of Justice of the European Communities, 4th ed. (London 1994).Google Scholar
Brown, J. and Lloyd, C., Federal-Type Solutions and European Integration (Lanham, MD 1993).Google Scholar
Brown-John, C. L., Federal-Type Solutions and European Integration (1993).Google Scholar
Brunell, T. and Stone Sweet, A., ‘The European Court, National Judges and Legal Integration: A Researcher’s Guide to the Data Base on Preliminary References in European Law, 1958–98’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal 117.Google Scholar
Bumke, C. and Voßkuhle, A., German Constitutional Law: Introduction, Cases, and Principles (Oxford 2019).Google Scholar
de Búrca, G., ‘The Evolution of EU Human Rights Law’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
de Búrca, G., ‘The Road Not Taken: The EU as a Global Human Rights Actor’ (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M., Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice (New York 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M., ‘Federal Democracy: Federalism as Political Culture, Civil Society, and Liberal Democratic Constitutionalism’ in Burgess, M., In Search of the Federal Spirit: New Comparative Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (Oxford 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M., Federalism and European Union: The Building of Europe, 1950–2000 (London 2000).Google Scholar
Burgess, M., In Search of the Federal Spirit: New Comparative Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (Oxford 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M. and Gagnon, A.-G. (eds.), Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions (London 1993).Google Scholar
Burghardt, G., ‘Die Europäische Verfassungsentwicklung aus dem Blickwinkel der USA’ in Golze, A. and Lenski, E. (eds.), Die europäische Verfassung im globalen Kontext (Baden-Baden 2004).Google Scholar
Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W., ‘Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’ (1993) 47(1) International Organization 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, G., Constitutional Law of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: Competence and Institutions in External Relations (Oxford 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoon, R. M., The Loyalists in Revolutionary America, 1760–1781 (New York 1973).Google Scholar
Calliess, C., ‘From Fiscal Compact to Fiscal Union? New Rules for the Eurozone’ (2011–2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D., ‘EU Speech at Bloomberg’ (23 January 2013), www.number10.gov.uk/news/eu-speech-at-bloomberg/.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M., Seccombe, M. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), Integration through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience (Berlin/New York 1985–87).Google Scholar
Carbone, S. M., ‘The Principle of the Primacy of EU Law over the National Legal Systems of Member States’ in Amato, G., Moavero-Milanesi, E., Pasquino, G. and Reichlin, L. (eds.), The History of the European Union: Constructing Utopia (Oxford 2018).Google Scholar
Cardwell, P. J. and French, D., ‘Who Decides? The CJEU’s Judgment on Jurisdiction in the MOX Plant Dispute’ (2007) 19(1) Journal of Environmental Law 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreau, D., ‘Droit communautaire et droits nationaux: concurrence ou primauté? La contribution de l’arrêt Simmenthal’ (1978) Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 381.Google Scholar
Carty, K. and Cross, W., ‘Political Parties and the Practice of Brokerage Politics’ in Courtney, J. and Smith, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics (New York 2010).Google Scholar
Cashin Ritaine, E. and Papeil, A.-S., ‘Federalism and Legal Unification in Switzerland’ in Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M. (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, Vol. 28 of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (Berlin/Heidelberg 2014).Google Scholar
Castells, M. and others (eds.), Europe’s Crises (Cambridge, UK/Medford, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Ceasar, J., Presidential Selection: Theory and Development (Princeton, NJ 1979).Google Scholar
Chalmers, D., ‘Judicial Authority and the Constitutional Treaty’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D., ‘The Single Market: From Prima Donna to Journeyman’ in Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds.), New Legal Dynamics of European Union (Oxford 1996).Google Scholar
Chalmers, D., Davies, G. T. and Monti, G., European Union Law: Cases and Materials, 2nd ed. (Cambridge 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaltiel, F., ‘Les crises de l’Europe’ (September 2011) No. 551 Revue de l’Union européenne 485.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E., Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 6th ed. (New York 2019).Google Scholar
Choudhry, S., ‘Ackerman’s Higher Lawmaking in Comparative Constitutional Perspective: Constitutional Moments as Constitutional Failures?’ (2008) 6(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhry, S., ‘Citizenship and Federations: Some Preliminary Reflections’ in Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R. (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford 2001).Google Scholar
Chryssochoou, D. N., Democracy in the European Union (London 1998).Google Scholar
Church, C. H. and Conrad, H. R., A Concise History of Switzerland (Cambridge 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, C. H. and Dardanelli, P., ‘The Dynamics of Confederalism and Federalism: Comparing Switzerland and the EU’ (2005) 15 Regional and Federal Studies 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cini, M. and Verdun, A., ‘The Implications of Brexit for the Future of Europe’ in Martill, B. and Staiger, U. (eds.), Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe (London 2018).Google Scholar
Claes, M., ‘The Primacy of EU Law in European and National Law’ in Arnull, A. and Chalmers, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford 2015).Google Scholar
Clement-Wilz, L., ‘Advocate General: A Key Actor of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2011–2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, W. R., Managing the Euro Area Debt Crisis (New York 2014).Google Scholar
Cloots, E., de Baere, G. and Sottiaux, S. (eds.), Federalism in the European Union (Oxford/Portland, OR 2012).Google Scholar
Closa, C. and Kochenov, D. (eds.), Reinforcing the Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocks, B., The European Parliament; Structure, Procedure and Practice (London 1973).Google Scholar
Cohen, J. C., ‘The European Preliminary Reference and U. S. Supreme Court Review of State Court Judgments: A Study in Comparative Judicial Federalism’ (1996) 44 American Journal of Comparative Law 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. L., ‘Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos’ (1999) 14 International Sociology 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn-Bendit, D. and Verhofstadt, G., For Europe! Manifesto for a Postnational Revolution in Europe (Munich 2012) (the French original makes clear that the authors were both interviewed by Jean Quatremer (Debout l’Europe!: manifeste pour une révolution postnationale en Europe; Suivi d’un entretien avec Jean Quatremer / Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Guy Verhofstadt (Brussels 2012)).Google Scholar
Condorelli, L., ‘Il caso Simmenthal e il primato del diritto comunitario: due corti a confronto’ (1978) I Giurisprudenza costituzionale 669.Google Scholar
Contartese, C., ‘The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in the ECJ’s External Relations Case Law: From the “Essential” to the “Specific Characteristics” of the Union and Back Again’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 1627.Google Scholar
Conti, N. (ed.), Party Attitudes towards the EU in the Member States: Parties for Europe, Parties against Europe (Abingdon/New York 2014).Google Scholar
Corbett, R., Jacobs, F. and Shackleton, M., The European Parliament, 8th ed. (London 2011).Google Scholar
Cordonier Segger, M. C., Gehring, M. and Newcombe, A., Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Alphen aan den Rijn 2010).Google Scholar
Costanzo, P., Mezzetti, L. and Ruggeri, A., Lineamenti di Diritto costituzionale dell’Unione Europea: Quarta edizione (Torino 2014).Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union, Annual Report 2012 (Luxembourg 2013).Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Competence and Member State Autonomy: Causality, Consequences and Legitimacy’ (2009) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 57/2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/soL3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1474325.Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Constitutional Process and Reform in the EU: Nice, Laeken, The Convention and the IGC’ (2004) 10 European Public Law 635.Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘European Governance: Executive and Administrative Powers under the New Constitutional Settlement’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Integration, Democracy, and Legitimacy’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Pringle and Use of EU Institutions Outside the EU Legal Framework: Foundations, Procedure and Substance’ (2013) 9 European Constitutional Law Review 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Pringle: Legal Reasoning, Text, Purpose and Teleology’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P., ‘The EU, Democracy and Institutional Structure: Past, Present and Future’, in Heusel, W. and Regeade, J.-P. (eds.), The Authority of EU Law (Berlin/Heidelberg 2019).Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Treaty Amendment, the Draft Constitution and European Integration’ in Barber, N. W., Cahill, M. and Ekins, R. (eds.), The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution (Oxford 2019).Google Scholar
Craig, P. and de Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th ed. (Oxford 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The Creation of States, 2nd ed. (Cambridge 2008).Google Scholar
Creech, R. L., Law and Language in the European Union: The Paradox of a Babel ‘United in Diversity’ (Groningen 2007).Google Scholar
Cremona, M., ‘The Position of CFSP/CSDP in the EU’s Constitutional Architecture’ in Blockmans, S. and Koutrakos, P (eds.), Research Handbook on the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Crook, S. B. and Hibbing, J. R., ‘A Not-So-Distant Mirror: The 17th Amendment and Congressional Change’ (1997) 91 American Political Science Review 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, D. and Mai’a, K., ‘Identity Politics and European Integration’ (2012) 44 Comparative Politics 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crum, B. and Fossum, J., ‘The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU’ (2009) 1(2) European Political Science Review 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D. M., ‘Judging EU Secrecy’ (2012) 2 Cahiers de Droit Européen 459.Google Scholar
Curtin, D. M., Postnational Democracy: The European Union in Search of a Political Philosophy (London 1997).Google Scholar
Cushman, C., Supreme Court Decisions and Women’s Rights: Milestones to Equality, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC 2011).Google Scholar
Danaci, D., ‘The Minaret Ban in Switzerland: An Exception to the Rule?’ in Marxer, W. (ed.), Direct Democracy and Minorities (New York/Heidelberg 2012).Google Scholar
Dardanelli, P., ‘Conclusions: Comparative Federalism and the Constitutional Treaty’ (2005) 15 Regional and Federal Studies 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dardanelli, P. and others, ‘Dynamic De/Centralization in Federations: Comparative Conclusions’ (2019) 49 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dashwood, A., ‘The Relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 355.Google Scholar
Davey, M., ‘Governor Accused in Scheme to Sell Obama’s Senate Seat’ (9 December 2008) New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/us/politics/10Illinois.html.Google Scholar
Davies, G., ‘Interpretative Pluralism within EU Law’ in Davies, G. and Avbelj, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G., ‘The European Union Legislature as an Agent of the European Court of Justice’ (2016) 54 Journal of Common Market Studies 846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. M., ‘Constitutional Borrowing: The Influence of Legal Culture and Local History in the Reconstitution of Comparative Influence: The South African Experience’ (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R., Electing Justice: Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process (New York 2005).Google Scholar
Dawson, M., ‘Should the EU Think Twice before Dumping Its Spitzenkandidaten?’, Verfassungsblog (2019), https://verfassungsblog.de/should-the-eu-think-twice-before-dumping-its-spitzenkandidaten/.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. and de Witte, F., ‘Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro-Crisis’ (2013) 76 Modern Law Review 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S., ‘Social Policy, Economic Governance and EMU: Alternatives to Austerity’, Cambridge Working Papers (Cambridge 2013).Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Browne, J., ‘Social Rights and Market Order’ in Hervey, T. K. and Kenner, J. (eds.), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Legal Perspective (Portland, OR 2003).Google Scholar
Defeis, E., ‘The Treaty of Lisbon and Human Rights’ (2009–2010) 16 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 413.Google Scholar
Delaney, E., ‘Managing in a Federal System without an “Ultimate Arbiter”: Kompetenz-Kompetenz in the EU and the Ante-Bellum United States’ (2005) 15(2) Regional and Federal Studies 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delledonne, G. and Fabbrini, F., ‘The Founding Myth of European Human Rights Law: Revisiting the Role of National Courts in the Rise of EU Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (2019) 2 European Law Review 178.Google Scholar
Dembart, L., ‘Giscard’s Summer Reading: Federalism in the U.S.: The Future Europe Takes Form’ (3 September 2002), New York Times.Google Scholar
Denza, E., ‘Article 48’ in Blanke, H.-J. and Mangiameli, S. (eds.), The Treaty on European Union (TEU): A Commentary (Berlin/Heidelberg 2013).Google Scholar
Devuyst, Y., ‘The European Union’s Constitutional Order? Between Community Method and Ad Hoc Compromise’ (2000) 18 Berkeley Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
DeWitt, J., et al., Anti-Federalist Papers (1787).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. (London 1915).Google Scholar
Dimitrakopoulos, D. G., ‘Incrementalism and Path Dependence: European Integration and Institutional Change in National Parliaments’ (2001) 39 Journal of Common Market Studies 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, D., Europe Recast: A History of European Union, 2nd ed. (London 2017).Google Scholar
Doherty, M., ‘W(h)ither Social Europe? Labour Rights in a Social Market Economy’ in Ferri, D. and Cortese, F. (eds.), The EU Social Market Economy and the Law: Theoretical Perspectives and Challenges for the EU (Abingdon/New York 2019).Google Scholar
Dombert, M., ‘Landesverfassungen und Landesverfassungsgerichte in ihrer Bedeutung für den Föderalismus’ in Härtel, I. (ed.), Handbuch Föderalismus – Föderalismus als demokratische Rechtsordnung und Rechtskultur in Deutschland, Europa und der Welt (Berlin/Heidelberg 2012).Google Scholar
Dorau, C. and Jacobi, P., ‘The Debate over a “European Constitution”: Is It Solely a German Concern?’ (2000) 6(3) European Public Law 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dorp, J. and Phoa, P., ‘How to Continue a Meaningful Judicial Dialogue about EU Law? From the Conditions in the CILFIT Judgment to the Creation of a New European Legal Culture’ (2018) 34 Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsen, N., ‘The Selection of U.S. Supreme Court Justices’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosenrode, S., ‘Policy-making in Federations and in the EU’ in Dosenrode, S. (ed.), Approaching the EUropean Federation? (London 2013).Google Scholar
Dougan, M., ‘The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning Minds, Not Hearts’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 617.Google Scholar
Douglas-Scott, S., ‘A Tale of Two Courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 629.Google Scholar
Drinoczi, T., ‘Constitutional Identity in Europe: The Identity of the Constitution: A Regional Approach’ (2020, forthcoming) German Law Journal, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3448407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duer, A. and Konstantinidis, N., ‘Ratifying International Treaties by Referendum: The Case of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty’, LSE Working Paper (2012).Google Scholar
Duff, J., ‘Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts’ (2009).Google Scholar
Dumbrovský, T., Petkova, B. and van der Sluis, M., ‘Judicial Appointments: The Article 255 TFEU Advisory Panel and Selection Procedures in the Member States’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 455.Google Scholar
Dyck, R., ‘Links between Federal and Provincial Parties and Party Systems’ (1991) 14 Representation, Integration and Political Parties in Canada 129.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency (Cambridge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist, The, ‘Charlemagne: A Flawed Temple: The Loss of Legitimacy May Now Be the Biggest Threat to the European Project’ (16 March 2013), www.economist.com/europe/2013/03/16/a-flawed-temple.Google Scholar
Economist, The, ‘The Euro Crisis: An Ever-Deeper Democratic Deficit: The Level of Further Integration Necessary to Deal with the Euro Crisis Will Be Hard to Square with the Increasing Cantankerousness of Europe’s Voters’ (26 May 2012), www.economist.com/briefing/2012/05/26/an-ever-deeper-democratic-deficit.Google Scholar
Economist, The, ‘European Union: The Right Verdict on the Constitution: European Voters Should Reject the New Constitutional Treaty and Demand Something Better’ (24 June 2004), www.economist.com/leaders/2004/06/24/the-right-verdict-on-the-constitution.Google Scholar
Economist, The, ‘Google and the EU: On Being Forgotten: The Right to Be Forgotten Sounds Attractive. But It Creates More Problems than It Solves’ (17 May 2014), www.economist.com/leaders/2014/05/17/on-being-forgotten.Google Scholar
Economist, The, ‘Great Britain or Little England? Fingers Crossed that the Country Will Choose Wisely’, Special Report (9 November 2013), www.economist.com/special-report/2013/11/07/great-britain-or-little-england.Google Scholar
Economist, The, ‘The European Union Constitution: Dead, but Not Yet Buried: Voters in France and the Netherlands Have Killed the EU Constitution’ (2 June 2005), www.economist.com/europe/2005/06/02/dead-but-not-yet-buried.Google Scholar
Economist, The, ‘The Future of Europe: The Europe that Died; And the One that Should Live On’ (2 June 2005), www.economist.com/leaders/2005/06/02/the-europe-that-died.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P., ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, P. and Lopez-Escudero, M., ‘Introduction’ in Eeckhout, P. and Lopez-Escudero, M. (eds.), The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis (London 2016).Google Scholar
Eijsbouts, T., ‘People and Peoples in EU Law: To Debunk the No-Demos Myth’ in Papadopoulou, L., Pernice, I. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), Legitimacy Issues of the European Union in the Face of Crisis (Baden-Baden 2017), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisgruber, C. and Weiler, J. H. H., ‘Preface’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, D. J., Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal, and Autonomy Arrangements (Harlow 1991).Google Scholar
Elazar, D. J., Federalism and the Way to Peace (Kingston, ON 1994).Google Scholar
Elazar, D. J., ‘Options, Problems and Possibilities in Light of the Current Situation’ in Elazar, D. J. (ed.), Self Rule – Shared Rule: Federal Solutions to the Middle East Conflict (Ramat Gan 1979).Google Scholar
Elliott, M. and Thomas, R., Public Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, M., The EU’s Common Commercial Policy: Institutions, Interests and Ideas (Abingdon/New York 2017).Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A., ‘Executive Power, the Commander in Chief, and the Militia Clause’ (2005–2006) 34 Hofstra Law Review 317.Google Scholar
Eriksen, E. O. and Fossum, J. E. (eds.), Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation? (London 2000).Google Scholar
Eriksen, E. O., Fossum, J. E. and Menéndez, A. (eds.), Developing a Constitution for Europe (London 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erk, J., Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland (New York 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskandari, V. and Banfi, E., ‘Institutionalising Islamophobia in Switzerland: The Burqa and Minaret Bans’ (2017) 4 Islamophobia Studies Journal 53.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C. and Geradin, D. (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration: Comparative Perspectives (New York 2001).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘White paper on the future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025’ COM(2017)2025.Google Scholar
European Parliament News, ‘Eurobarometer Survey Shows Highest Support for the EU in 35 Years’, 23 May 2018, www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20180522STO04020/eurobarometer-survey-highest-support-for-the-eu-in-35-years.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F., ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity’ in Schütze, R. and Tridimas, T. (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law: Volume 1: The European Union Legal Order (Oxford 2018) 1418, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2781845.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F. and Maduro, M. P., ‘Supranational Constitutional Courts’, iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 98 (2017) 14, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2990277.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S., ‘Alternative Governance Models: “Hard Core” in a Differentiated Europe’ (2019) 17 Comparative European Politics 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, S., Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar (New York 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (ed.), Democracy and Federalism in the European Union and the United States: Exploring Post-National Governance (Abingdon/New York 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkner, G., ‘The EU’s Problem-Solving Capacity and Legitimacy in a Crisis Context: A Virtuous or Vicious Circle?’ (2016) 39 West European Politics 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraguna, P., ‘Constitutional Identity in the EU: A Shield or a Sword?’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, D. A., ‘The Inevitability of Practical Reason: Statutes, Formalism, and the Rule of Law’ (1992) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review 533.Google Scholar
FBI, The FBI: A Centennial History, 1908–2008 (Washington, DC 2008).Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘“Which in Your Case You Have Not Got”: Constitutionalism at Home and Abroad’ (2011) 64 Current Legal Problems 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, S. P., ‘Fundamental Rights at the Crossroads of EU Constitutionalism: Decoding the Member States’ Key(s) to the Charter’ (2018) 60 Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichera, M., The Foundations of the EU as a Polity (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelman, P., ‘James Madison and the Bill of Rights: A Reluctant Paternity’ (1990) 9 Supreme Court Review 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L., Defending Congress and the Constitution (Lawrence, KS 2010).Google Scholar
Fleiner, T., Misic, A. and Töpperwien, N., Constitutional Law in Switzerland (Alphen aan den Rijn 2012).Google Scholar
Fleiner-Gerster, T., ‘Problèmes de la souveraineté intérieure et extérieure’ in Fleiner-Gerster, T. and Hutter, S. (eds.), Federalism and Decentralization (Fribourg 1987).Google Scholar
Fleiner-Gerster, T. and Misic, A., ‘Föderalismus als Ordnungssprizip der Verfassung’ in Thürer, D., Aubert, J.-F. and Müller, J.-P. (eds.), Verfassungsrecht der Schweiz (Zürich 2001).Google Scholar
Foner, E. and Garraty, J. A. (eds.), The Reader’s Companion to American History (New York 1991).Google Scholar
Forsyth, M., ‘The Political Objectives of European Integration’ (1967) 43(3) International Affairs 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin-Rittberger, J. and Rittberger, B., ‘Do Electoral Rules Matter? Explaining National Differences in Women’s Representation in the European Parliament’ (2014) European Union Politics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, J. E. and Jachtenfuchs, M., ‘Federal Challenges and Challenges to Federalism: Insights from the EU and Federal States’ (2017) Journal of European Public Policy 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, J. E. and Menéndez, A. J., The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union (Lanham, MD 2011).Google Scholar
Fossum, J. E. and Schlesinger, P., The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? (Abingdon/New York 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, N., EU Law Directions (Oxford 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouskas, V. K. and Dimoulas, C., ‘The Greek Workshop of Debt and the Failure of the European Project’ (2012) 14 Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J., Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic (New Haven, CT 2002).Google Scholar
Fritz, C. G., American Sovereigns: The People and America’s Constitutional Tradition before the Civil War (Cambridge 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Full Fact, ‘Was the EU Referendum “Advisory”?’ (8 November 2016), https://fullfact.org/europe/was-eu-referendum-advisory.Google Scholar
Galinas, F. and Sirota, L., ‘Constitutional Conventions and Senate Reform’ (2013) 5 Revue québécoise de droit constitutionnel 107.Google Scholar
Garben, S., ‘The Problematic Interaction between EU and International Law in the Area of Social Rights’ (2018) 7 Cambridge International Law Journal 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G., ‘International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community’s Internal Market’ (1992) 46(2) International Organization 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudreault-DesBiens, J.-F. and Karazivan, N., ‘Canada: Upcoming Appointment of Supreme Court Judges’ (October 2011) Canada Public Law 827.Google Scholar
Gazzola, M. and Grin, F., ‘Is English as Lingua Franca More Effective and Fair than Translation? An Evaluation of the EU’s Multilingual Regime’ (2013) 23 International Journal of Applied Linguistics 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzola, M. and Ronza, R. W., ‘The Politics and Policy of Multilingualism in the European Union’ (2018) 1 Brown Journal of World Affairs 55.Google Scholar
Gehring, M., ‘Brexit and EU–UK Trade Relations with Third States’ EU Law Analysis (6 March 2016), http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/03/brexit-and-eu-uk-trade-relations-with.html.Google Scholar
Gehring, M., ‘Subnational Participation in International Trade Law: Options for the European Union’ (2018) CIGI Papers No. 167, www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.167_web_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Gehring, M., ‘The German Constitutional Court’s Latest Decision on European Elections: No Protection Needed’, International Journal of Constitutional Law blog (28 February 2014) www.iconnectblog.com/2014/02/the-german-constitutional-courts-latest-decision-on-european-elections-no-protection-needed.Google Scholar
Gehring, M. and Cordonier Segger, M. C., Sustainable Development in World Trade Law (Alphen aan den Rijn 2005).Google Scholar
Genovese, M. A., A Presidential Nation: Causes, Consequences, and Cures (New York/Abingdon 2013).Google Scholar
Genovese, M. A., Presidential Leadership in an Age of Change (Abingdon/New York 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgosouli, A., ‘The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation’ (2012) 10(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, J. and Neidhart, F., ‘Strukturen und Funtionen moderner Offentlichkeit. Fragestellungen und Ansatze’ in Muller-Dohm, S. and Neumann-Braun, K. (eds.), Offentlichkeit, Kultur, Massenkommunikation. Beitrage zur Medienkommunikationssoziologie (Oldenburg 1991).Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. and Caldeira, G. A., ‘Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis’ (1998) 28 British Journal of Political Science 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glencross, A., E Pluribus Europa? Assessing the Viability of the EU Compound Polity by Analogy with the Early US Republic (Florence 2007).Google Scholar
Glencross, A., ‘The Spitzenkandidaten Process Has “Presidentialised” the Commission, But Only Time Will Tell Whether It Allows for Better Representation of Citizens’ Views’, LSE EUROPP blog (10 Sep 2014), http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/09/10/the-spitzenkandidaten-process-has-presidentialised-the-commission-but-only-time-will-tell-whether-it-allows-for-better-representation-of-citizens-views.Google Scholar
Glencross, A., What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience (Basingstoke/New York 2009).Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P., Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law (Oxford 2000).Google Scholar
Glick, J., ‘On the Road: The Supreme Court and the History of Circuit Riding’ (2002–2003) 24 Cardozo Law Review 1753.Google Scholar
Goebel, J. Jr., ‘Constitutional History and Constitutional Law’ (1938) 38 Columbia Law Review 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goerlich, H., Huber, W. and Lehmann, K., Verfassung ohne Gottesbezug?: Zu einer aktuellen europäischen Kontroverse (Leipzig 2004).Google Scholar
Goldner Lang, I., ‘The EU Financial and Migration Crises: Two Crises – Many Facets of EU Solidarity’ in Biondi, A., Dagilyte, E. and Kucuk, E. (eds.), Solidarity in EU Law: Legal Principle in the Making (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Goldstein, A., ‘History, Homosexuality, and Political Values: Searching for the Hidden Determination of Bowers v. Hardwick’ (1987) 97 Yale Law Journal 1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L. F., Constituting Federal Sovereignty: The European Union in Comparative Context (Baltimore, MD 2001).Google Scholar
Gonzales, A., ‘Presidential Powers, Immunities, and Pardons’ (2018–2019) 96 Washington University Law Review 905.Google Scholar
Govender, K., ‘Federalism and Legal Unification in South Africa’ in Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M. (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, Vol. 28 of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (Berlin/Heidelberg 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammond, S., Identity Captured by Law: Membership in Canada’s Indigenous Peoples and Linguistic Minorities (Montreal, QC/Kingston, ON 2009).Google Scholar
Gray, A., Barigazzi, J. and de la Baume, M., ‘Who Killed the Spitzenkandidat? No Shortage of Suspects in Drama over How EU Should Be Governed’ (7 May 2019) Politico, www.politico.eu/article/who-killed-the-spitzenkandidat-european-parliament-election-2019-transition/.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J., ‘The European Citizens’ Initiative: Bringing the EU Closer to Its Citizens?’ (2018) Comparative European Politics 940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grekousis, G., ‘Further Widening or Bridging the Gap? A Cross-Regional Study of Unemployment across the EU Amid Economic Crisis’ (2018) 10 Sustainability, www.mdpi.com/2071–1050/10/6/1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenon, A., ‘Unification of Laws in Federal Systems: The Canadian Model’ in Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M. (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, Vol. 28 of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (Berlin/Heidelberg 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, P. B., ‘The European Union and Its Issue with Democracy: A Closer Look at the Irish Rejection of the Lisbon Treaty’ (2018) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3205274.Google Scholar
Griffin, S. M., ‘Constitutional Theory Transformed’ (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal 2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D., ‘Braucht Europa eine Verfassung?’ (1995) Juristenzeitung 581.Google Scholar
Grimm, D., Braucht Europa eine Verfassung?, vol. 60 Siemens Stiftung (Munich 1995).Google Scholar
Grimm, D., ‘Integration by Constitution’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D., The Constitution of European Democracy (Oxford 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D., ‘The European Court of Justice and National Courts: The German Constitutional Perspective after the Maastricht Decision’ (1997) 3 Columbia Journal of European Law 229.Google Scholar
Grosman, L. S., ‘Argentine Constitutional Law: An Overview’ (2015) 43 International Journal of Legal Information 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grote, R., ‘Constitutional Courts in Federal States: The Case of Germany’ (2017) 17 Fédéralisme Régionalisme, https://popups.uliege.be/1374-3864/index.php?id=1691.Google Scholar
Groussot, X., Creation, Development and Impact of the General Principles of Community Law: Towards a Ius Commune Europaeum? (Lund 2005).Google Scholar
Häberle, P., Europäische Rechtskultur (Baden-Baden 1994).Google Scholar
Häberle, P., Europäische Verfassungslehre (Baden-Baden 2009).Google Scholar
Häberle, P., ‘Gemeineuropäisches Verfassungsrecht’ (1991) Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift 261.#Google Scholar
Habermans, J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, translated by William Rehg (Cambridge 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘Citizen and State Equality in a Supranational Political Community: Degressive Proportionality and the Pouvoir Constituant Mixte’ (2017) 55 Journal of Common Market Studies 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie (Frankfurt 1996).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’ (2006) 14 European Journal of Philosophy 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn, H., ‘Föderalismus und die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit: die Einbürgerungspolitik der Bundesländer’ in Akgün, L. and Thränhardt, D. (eds.), Integrationspolitik in föderalistischen Systemen (Münster 2001).Google Scholar
Halberstam, D., ‘“A People for Certain Purposes”: On the History and Philosophy of Federalism(S) in the United States And Europe’ (2018) University of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 619, 25, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3241597.Google Scholar
Halberstam, D. and Mollers, C., ‘The German Constitutional Court Says “Ja zu Deutschland!”’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M., ‘Federalism and Legal Unification: Comparing Methods, Results, and Explanations across Twenty Systems’ in Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M. (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, Vol. 28 of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (Berlin/Heidelberg 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, D. and Reimann, M. (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems (Berlin/Heidelberg 2014), Vol. 28 of the ongoing Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (2007–).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 2nd ed. (New York 2005).Google Scholar
Hall, M., ‘Mixed Reaction to “Opt-Out” from EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2007) 7 European Industrial Relations Observatory Online.Google Scholar
Haller, W., ‘The New Swiss Constitution: Foreign and International Influences’ (2002) 30 International Journal of Legal Information 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstein, W., Götz, H. H. and Narjes, K.-H., Der unvollendete Bundesstaat – Europäische Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse (Dusseldorf 1969).Google Scholar
Hamburger, P., ‘Law and Judicial Duty’ (2003) 72 George Washington Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist No. 17’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist No. 33’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist No. 69’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist No. 80’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist No. 84’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).Google Scholar
Hansen, R. and Weil, P., Dual Nationality, Social Rights and Federal Citizenship in the US and Europe: The Reinvention of Citizenship (New York/Oxford 2002).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Haskins, G. and Johnson, H., History of the Supreme Court of the United States: Foundations of Power, John Marshall 1801–15 (New York 1981).Google Scholar
Hatton, R. M., Oresko, R., Gibbs, G. C. and Scott, H. M., Royal and Republican Sovereignty in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Memory of Ragnhild Hatton (Cambridge 1997).Google Scholar
Heater, D. B., A Brief History of Citizenship (New York 2004).Google Scholar
Heath, J. N., ‘Exposing the Second Amendment: Federal Preemption of State Militia Legislation’ (2001–2002) 79 University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 39.Google Scholar
van Hecke, S., Wolfs, W. and de Groof, V., ‘25 Years of Spitzenkandidaten: What Does the Future Hold?’ (2018) Wilfred Martens Centre for European Studies Policy Brief, https://martenscentre.eu/sites/default/files/publication-files/ces_policybrief_spitzenkandidaten-web.pdf.Google Scholar
Heinemann-Gruder, A., Federalism Doomed? European Federalism between Integration and Separation (New York/Oxford 2002).Google Scholar
Held, D., Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. (Cambridge 2006).Google Scholar
Heller, H., Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. 2 (Leiden 1971).Google Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘The Constitution for Its Third Century: Foreign Affairs’ (1989) 83(4) American Journal of International Law 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henri, D., Le Quintrec, G., Geiss, P., Prass, R. and Mursa, E., Histoire/Geschichte (Stuttgart/Leipzig 2008).Google Scholar
Hepp, A. and others, The Communicative Construction of Europe: Cultures of Political Discourse (London 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herlin-Karnell, E., ‘The Domination of Security and the Promise of Justice: On Justification and Proportionality in Europe’s “Area of Freedom, Security and Justice”’ (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, A. M., Sub-national Constitutional Law in Argentina (Alphen aan den Rijn 2011).Google Scholar
Herrmann, R. K. and others, Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU (Oxford 2004).Google Scholar
Hesse, J. J. and Wright, V., Federalizing Europe? The Costs, Benefits and Preconditions of Federal Political Systems (Oxford 1996).Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘The ICJ, the CJEU, and the Integrity of International Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, L., Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile (New York 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinarejos, A., ‘El diálogo judicial en curso y los poderes del Banco Central Europeo: la sentencia Weiss’ (2019) 23 Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinarejos, A., ‘Fiscal Federalism in the European Union: Evolution and Future Choices for EMU’ (2013) 50(6) Common Market Law Review 1621.Google Scholar
Hinarejos, A., ‘The Euro Area Crisis and Constitutional Limits to Fiscal Integration’ (2011–2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinarejos, A., The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective (Oxford 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, G., ‘Kein Staat, aber eine Verfassung’ (2000) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 46.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘Preserving Hegemony? Assessing the Political Origins of the EU Constitution’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
His, E., Schweizer Verfassungsgeschichte: Der Bundesstaat von 1848 bis 1914. Register zu Band I–III (Zurich 1938).Google Scholar
Hix, S., ‘Decentralised Federalism: A New Model for the EU’ in Martill, B. and Staiger, U. (eds.), Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe (London 2018) 7280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S., ‘Elections, Parties and Institutional Design: A Comparative Perspective on European Union Democracy’ (1998) 21 West European Politics 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S. B., ‘A Vote for the President? The Role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’ (2014) 21(10) Journal of European Public Policy 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S. B., ‘The Crisis of Legitimacy of European Institutions’ in Castells, M. and others (eds.), Europe’s Crises (Cambridge, UK/Medford, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Hobson, C. F., The Great Chief Justice: John Marshall and the Rule of Law (Lawrence, KS 1996).Google Scholar
Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (eds.), The Transformation of EU Treaty Making (Cambridge 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, D. and Peterson, J. (eds.), The Institutions of the European Union (Oxford 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, D. and Puetter, U., ‘The Euro Crisis and European Integration’ in Cini, M. and Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, N., European Union Politics, 5th ed. (Oxford 2016).Google Scholar
Hodson, D. and Puetter, U., ‘The European Union in Disequilibrium: New Intergovernmentalism, Postfunctionalism and Integration Theory in the Post-Maastricht Period’ (2019) 26 Journal of European Public Policy 1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, A., ‘Resistance against the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2018) 14 International Journal of Law in Context 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, H., ‘To Bail Out or Not to Bail Out? Legal Aspects of the Greek Crisis’ (2011) 13 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, P. W., Constitutional Law of Canada, 6th ed. (Toronto 2013).Google Scholar
Holdgaard, R., Elkan, D. and Schaldemose, G. K., ‘From Cooperation to Collision: The ECJ’s Ajos Ruling and the Danish Supreme Court’s Refusal to Comply’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 17.Google Scholar
Hollyer, J. B., Rosendorff, B. P. and Vreeland, J. R., Transparency, Democracy, and Autocracy: Economic Transparency and Political (In)Stability (Cambridge 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, G., Sebaldt, M. and Zeitler, B., Die CSU Strukturwandel, Modernisierung und Herausforderungen einer Volkspartei (Wiesbaden 2010).Google Scholar
Höreth, M., Die Selbstautorisierung des Agenten: der Europäische Gerichtshof im Vergleich zum U.S. Supreme Court (Baden-Baden 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hottelier, M., ‘La justice constitutionnelle en Suisse’ (2017) 17 Fédéralisme Régionalisme 56, http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:102293.Google Scholar
Howart, D. and Spendzharova, A., ‘Accountability in Post‐Crisis Eurozone Governance: The Tricky Case of the European Stability Mechanism’ (2019) 57 Journal of Common Market Studies 894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, T. O. and Fenna, A., Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry (Toronto 2006).Google Scholar
Hug, S. and König, T., ‘In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference’ (2002) 56 International Organization 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhe, N., Naurin, D. and Thomson, R., ‘Don’t Cry for Me Britannia: The Resilience of the European Union to Brexit’ (2019) European Union Politics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innerarity, D., Democracy in Europe (Cham 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipsen, H. P., Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht (Heidelberg 1972).Google Scholar
Ipsen, H.-P., ‘Europäische Verfassung – Nationale Verfassung’ (1987) Europarecht 195.Google Scholar
Ipsen, H.-P., Verfassungsperspektiven der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (Berlin 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, V. C., ‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement’ (2005) Harvard Law Review 109.Google Scholar
Jackson, V. C., ‘US Constitutional Law and History’ in Masterman, R. and Schütze, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge 2019).Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. B., The EU after Brexit: Institutional and Policy Implications (Cham 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jančić, D., ‘TTIP and Legislative‒Executive Relations in EU Trade Policy’ (2016) 40 West European Politics 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, J., ‘Building Resilience, Demolishing Accountability? The Role of Europol in Counter-Terrorism’ (2018) 28(4) Policing and Society 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellinek, G., Die Lehre von den Staatenverbindungen (Vienna 1882).Google Scholar
Jimenez, A. de la Fuente, J. M. and Duran, J. J., ‘Is There an East–West Structure in the Location of FDI in Europe? The Role of Institutions and Political Risk’ (2013) 3 Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe.Google Scholar
Jiménez, L. A., ‘Constitutional Empathy and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union’ (2018) 24 European Public Law 57.Google Scholar
Jin, Q., ‘Linguistic Hegemony in the EU’ (2017) Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Social Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C., ‘Europe’s Economic Constitution in Crisis’, ZenTra Working Papers in Transnational Studies 6/2012 (Bremen 2013), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2179595.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., ‘Justum facere in the European Integration Process: How Should the Law Promote the Constitutionalization of Europe?’ Helsinki Legal Studies Research Paper No. 23, 19, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2214814.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., ‘What Is Left of the European Economic Constitution? A Melancholic Eulogy’ (2005) 30 European Law Review 461.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. and Roedl, F., ‘Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the “Social Deficit” of European Integration: Reflections after the Judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, M., The European Union and the People (New York 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D. and Meunier, S., ‘Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration’ (2016) Comparative Political Studies 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, C., ‘Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity’ (2007) 11 Citizenship Studies 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joutsen, M., ‘The European Union and Cooperation in Criminal Matters’ in Natarajan, M. (ed.), International and Transnational Crime and Justice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge 2019).Google Scholar
Junker, D., Cornerstone of Democracy: The West German Grundgesetz, 1949–1989 (Washington, DC 1995).Google Scholar
Kadelbach, S. (ed.), Verfassungskrisen in der Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. W., ‘Interpretation and Authority in State Constitutionalism’ (1993) 106 Harvard Law Review 1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppi, N. and Madsen, M. R., ‘Non-elected Political Elites in the EU’ in Best, H. and Higley, H. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites (London 2018).Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. D., ‘Selection, Appointment, and Legitimacy’ in Bobek, M., Selecting Europe’s Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (Oxford 2015).Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. D., ‘The Dangers of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Davies, G. and Avbelj, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Ketcham, R. (ed.), The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (New York 2003).Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, C. and de Witte, B., ‘Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges’ (22 April 2014), EUI Law Research Paper No. 2014/05, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2428855.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., The Emergence of Global Administrative Law (Durham, NC 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhof, P., ‘The Balance of Powers between National and European Institutions’ (1999) 5 European Law Journal 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, C., ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Treaty on European Union: A Critique from a Perspective of Constitutional Economics’ (1998) 6 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 305.Google Scholar
Kjaer, P. F., Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A., The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
Klamert, M. and Kochenov, D., ‘Article 2 TEU’ in Kellerbauer, M., Klamert, M. and Tomkin, J. (eds.), The Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford 2019).Google Scholar
Kleine, M., ‘Informal Governance and Legitimacy in EU Politics’ (2018) 40 Journal of European Integration 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleine, M. and Pollack, M., ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Its Critics’ (2018) 56 Journal of Common Market Studies 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloepfer, M., Verfassungsrecht. 1. Grundlagen, Staatsorganisationsrecht, Bezüge zum Völker-und Europarecht (Munich 2011).Google Scholar
Knapp, A. T., ‘Law’s Revolution: Benjamin Austin and the Spirit of ’86’ (2013) 25 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 271.Google Scholar
Kobach, K. W., The Referendum: Direct Democracy in Switzerland (Aldershot 1993).Google Scholar
Kocharov, A., ‘This Time It’s Different? Constitutional Complexities of the Spitzenkandidaten Arrangement’ (2014) Berliner Online-Beiträge zum Europarecht 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komárek, J., ‘Czech Constitutional Court Playing with Matches: The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU Ultra Vires; Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention (New York 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschnik, A., ‘The Democratic Societies of Philadelphia and the Limits of the American Public Sphere, circa 1793–1795’ (2001) 58 The William and Mary Quarterly 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostakopoulou, T., ‘Democracy-Talk in the European Union: The Need for a Reflexive Approach’ (2003) 9 Columbia Journal of European Law 411.Google Scholar
Koutrakos, P., ‘More on Autonomy – Opinion 1/17 (CETA)’ (2019) 3 European Law Review 293.Google Scholar
Kovács, K., ‘Ethnocultural Identity in East Central European Courts’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, L., EC Environmental Law, 7th ed. (London 2011).Google Scholar
Kreppel, A., The European Parliament and Supranational Party System: A Study in Institutional Development (Cambridge 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühn, Z., ‘Ultra Vires Review and the Demise of Constitutional Pluralism: The Czecho-Slovak Pension Saga, and the Dangers of State Courts’ Defiance of EU Law’ (2016) 23 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuisma, M., ‘Jurisdiction, Rule of Law, and Unity of EU Law in Rosneft’ (2018) 37 Yearbook of European Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukk, M., ‘Enhanced Fiscal Governance in the European Union: The Fiscal Compact’ (2018) 5 Baltic Journal of European Studies 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘Beyond Golf Clubs and the Judicialization of Politics: Why Europe Has a Constitution Properly So Called’ (2006) 54 American Journal of Comparative Law 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. and Comella, V. F., ‘The Primacy Clause of the Constitutional Treaty and the Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuniholm, B., Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: Differences in European and US Attitudes, and Challenges for Turkey’ (2001) 2 Turkish Studies 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, J., ‘Must Europe Be Swiss? On the Idea of a Voting Space and the Possibility of a Multilingual Demos’ 44 British Journal of Political Science 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacorne, D., ‘European Citizenship: The Relevance of the American Model’ in Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R. (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford 2001).Google Scholar
Lacroix, J., ‘Does Europe Need Common Values? Habermas vs Habermas’ (2009) 8 European Journal of Political Theory 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, B. and Schlosser, P., ‘Public Finances in Europe: Fortifying EU Economic Governance in the Shadow of the Crisis’ (2016) 38 Journal of European Integration 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landfried, C., Constitutional Review and Legislation: An International Comparison (Baden-Baden 1988).Google Scholar
Lane, P. R., ‘The European Sovereign Debt Crisis’ (2012) 26 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P. R., ‘The Irish Crisis’ in Beblavý, M., Cobham, D. and Ódor, L. (eds.), The Euro Area and the Financial Crisis (Cambridge 2011).Google Scholar
Larkin, P. M., ‘Incapacity, the Labour Market and Social Security: Coercion into “Positive” Citizenship’ (2011) 74 Modern Law Review 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, F., The EU and Federalism: Polities and Policies Compared (Farnham 2011).Google Scholar
Laursen, F. (ed.), The EU and the Eurozone Crisis: Policy Challenges and Strategic Choices (Farnham 2013).Google Scholar
Lawson, G., ‘A Truism with Attitude: The Tenth Amendment in Constitutional Context’ (2007–2008) 83 Notre Dame Law Review 469.Google Scholar
Lee, M., ‘The Ambiguity of Multi-Level Governance and (De-)Harmonisation in EU Environmental Law’ (2012–2013) 15 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, F., ‘Consociational Democracy in Switzerland: A Political-Economic Explanation and Some Empirical Evidence’ (1984) 12 European Journal of Political Research 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leino, P. and Petrov, R., ‘Between “Common Values” and Competing Universals: The Promotion of the EU’s Common Values through the European Neighbourhood Policy’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal 654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K., ‘Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism’ (1990) 38(2) American Journal of Comparative Law 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K., ‘The Basic Constitutional Charter of a Community Based on the Rule of Law’ in Maduro, M. P. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. (ed.), Two Hundred Years of U.S. Constitution and Thirty Years of EEC Treaty (Brussels 1988).Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. and Gutierrez-Fons, J. A., ‘A Constitutional Perspective’ in Schütze, R. and Tridimas, T. (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law: Volume 1: The European Union Legal Order (Oxford 2018).Google Scholar
Létourneau, J., ‘“Silent Revolution”: The Transformation of the Québécois Identity’ (2017) 32 London Journal of Canadian Studies 98.Google Scholar
Levinson, S., ‘Transitions’ (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal 2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebert, U., ‘Civil Society, Public Sphere and Democracy in the EU’ in Eriksen, E. O. and Fossum, J. E. (eds.), Rethinking Democracy and the European Union (London 2013).Google Scholar
Liedhegener, A. and Gerstenhauer, D., ‘Auf dem Weg zu einem kooperativen Verhaeltnis Religion und die Vertiefung der Europaeischen Union’ in Leisse, O. (ed.), Die Europaeische Union nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon (Wiesbaden 2010).Google Scholar
Lienhard, A. and others, ‘The Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland: Judicial Balancing of federalism without Judicial Review’ in Aroney, N. and Kincaid, J. (eds.), Courts in Federal Countries: Federalists or Unitarists? (Toronto 2017).Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (New Haven, CT 1977).Google Scholar
Lindeboom, J., ‘Why EU Law Claims Supremacy’ (2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, P. L., ‘Law, History and Memory: “Republican Moments” and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Review in France’ (1996–1997) 3 Columbia Journal of European Law 49.Google Scholar
Lindseth, P. L., Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State (New York 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingren, K.-O. and Persson, T., ‘Participatory Governance in the European Union’ in Heinelt, H. (ed.), Handbook on Participatory Governance (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
de Londras, F., ‘Convergence Gaps in EU Counter-Terrorism’ in de Londras, F. and Doddy, J. (eds.), The Impact, Legitimacy and Effectiveness of EU Counter-Terrorism (London/New York 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, M. A., Constitutionalising Europe: Processes and Practices (Farnham/Burlington, VT 2006).Google Scholar
Lord, C., Democracy in the European Union (Sheffield 1998).Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., ‘What Is Constitutionalism’ in Dobner, P. and Loughlin, M., The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (New York 2010).Google Scholar
Low, P. W. and Jeffries, J. C., Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, 4th ed. (New York 1998).Google Scholar
Lustig, D. and Weiler, J. H. H., ‘Judicial Review in the Contemporary World: Retrospective and Prospective’ (2018) 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Amhlaigh, C., ‘The Anatomy of Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union’ in Davies, G. and Avbelj, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Machill, M., Beiler, M. and Fischer, C., ‘Europe-Topics in Europe’s Media: The Debate about the European Public Sphere: A Meta-Analysis of Media Content Analyses’ (2006) 21 European Journal of Communication 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclure, J., ‘Le projet d’une charte de la laïcité: les raisons d’un sain scepticisme’ (2013) 34 La Revue Tocqueville 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclure, J. Quebec Identity: The Challenge of Pluralism (Montreal/Kingston, Ontario 2013) 1011.Google Scholar
Macmahon, A. W. (ed.), Federalism Mature and Emergent (New York 1955).Google Scholar
Maddex, R. L., Constitutions of the World (New York 1996).Google Scholar
Madison, J., ‘The Federalist No. 40’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).Google Scholar
Madison, J., ‘The Federalist No. 44’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).Google Scholar
Madison, J., ‘The Federalist No. 50’ in The Federalist Papers (1787–1788).Google Scholar
Madsen, M. R., Olsen, H. P. and Šadl, U., ‘Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities: The Danish Supreme Court’s Decision in the Ajos Case and the National Limits of Judicial Cooperation’ (2017) 23 European Law Journal 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maduro, M. P., ‘The Importance of Being Called a Constitution: Constitutional Authority and the Authority of Constitutionalism’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magen, A. and Pech, L., ‘The Rule of Law and the European Union’ in May, C. and Winchester, A. (eds.), Handbook on the Rule of Law (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Maier, J. and others, ‘This Time It’s Different? Effects of the Eurovision Debate on Young Citizens and Its Consequence for EU Democracy: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in 24 Countries’ (2018) 25 Journal of European Public Policy 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, M., Strömbäck, J. and Lee Kaid, L., Political Communication in European Parliamentary Elections (Farnham 2011).Google Scholar
Mair, P. and Thomassen, J., ‘Electoral Democracy and Political Representation in the European Union’ (1 April 2008) Paper prepared for the Conference on Representation, Immigration and the 2009 Election to the European Parliament, Indiana University, Bloomington, www.indiana.edu/~west/documents/electoral_democracy_mair_2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Maletic, I., ‘The Story of the EU and the Happily Roaming Consumers Case No. C58/08, Vodafone Ltd, et al. v. Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform’ (2011) 38 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 199.Google Scholar
Mancini, G. F., Democracy and Constitutionalism in the EU (Oxford 2000).Google Scholar
Mancini, G. F., ‘The Making of a Constitution for Europe’ in Keohane, R. and Hoffman, S. (eds.), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change (Boulder, CO 1991).Google Scholar
Mancini, S., ‘Taking Secularism (Not Too) Seriously: The Italian “Crucifix Case”’ (2006) 1 Religion and Human Rights 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, D., ‘We, the People’ vs. ‘We, the Peoples’: The Debate over the Nature of the Union in the USA and Canada and Its Lessons for European Integration (Florence 2012).Google Scholar
Manners, I., ‘The Normative Ethics of the European Union’ (2008) 84 International Affairs 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. F., ‘Textualism and Legislative Intent’ (2005) 91(2) Virginia Law Review 419.Google Scholar
Manning, J. F., ‘Textualism and the Equity of the Statute’ (2005) 101(1) Columbia Law Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantu, S. and Minderhoud, P., ‘EU Citizenship and Social Solidarity’ (2017) 24 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martí, J. L., ‘European Democracy and the No-Demos Thesis’ in D. Innerarity and others (eds.), A New Narrative for a New Europe (2018).Google Scholar
Márton, P., ‘Europe’s Crises: Preparing to Study Disintegration’ (2018) 14 Journal of Contemporary European Research 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maśnicki, J., ‘From Integration to Fragmentation? The Late and Incorrect Transposition of the EU Directives’ in Grzeszczak, R. (ed.), Renationalisation of the Integration Process in the Internal Market of the European Union (Baden-Baden 2018).Google Scholar
Mason, H. L., The European Coal and Steel Community: Experiment in Supranationalism (The Hague 1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, C. R.., ‘The Locus of Sovereignty: Judicial Review, Legislative Supremacy, and Federalism in The Constitutional Traditions of Canada and the United States’ (1990) Duke Law Journal 1229.Google Scholar
Maurer, A., ‘Less Bargaining – More Deliberation: The Convention Method for Enhancing EU Democracy’ (2003) Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 167.Google Scholar
Maurer, H. and Manssen, G., Staatsrecht I (2003).Google Scholar
de Mauro, T., In Europa son già 103. Troppe lingue per una democrazia? (Laterza 2014).Google Scholar
Mayer, F. C., ‘Competences – Reloaded? The Vertical Division of Powers in the EU and the New European Constitution’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J.-F., ‘A Country without Minarets: Analysis of the Background and Meaning of the Swiss Vote of 29 November 2009’ (2011) 41(1) Religion 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBain, H. L., The Living Constitution: A Consideration of the Realities and Legends of Our Fundamental Law (1927).Google Scholar
McDougal, M. S., ‘The Comparative Study of Law for Policy Purposes: Value Clarification as an Instrument of Democratic World Order’ (1952) 1 American Journal of Comparative Law 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, D. H., Designing Europe: Comparative Lessons from the Federal Experience (New York 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManners, J., The Oxford History of Christianity (New York 1993).Google Scholar
Meissner, K., ‘Democratizing EU External Relations: The European Parliament’s Informal Role in SWIFT, ACTA, and TTIP’ (2016) 21 European Foreign Affairs Review 269.Google Scholar
Menéndez, A. J., ‘A Christian or a Laic Europe? Christian Values and European Identity’ (2005) 18 Ratio Juris 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merler, S. and Pisani-Ferry, J., ‘Sudden Stops in the Euro Area’ (2012) 3(3) Review of Economics and Institutions 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestmacker, E.-J., ‘On the Legitimacy of European Law’ (1994) The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law 615.Google Scholar
Meyer, C., ‘Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit’ (1999) 37 Journal of Common Market Studies 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. and Bernsdorff, N., Kommentar zur Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden 2003).Google Scholar
Meyer, J.-H., The European Public Sphere: Media and Transnational Communication in European Integration 1969–1991 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag 2010).Google Scholar
Michel, H., ‘La transparence dans l’Union européenne: réalisation de la bonne gouvernance et redéfinition de la démocratie’ (2018) 165 Revue française d’administration publique 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Middelaar, L., ‘Seven Brexit Propositions: Towards a Union the Protects’ in Martill, B. and Staiger, U. (eds.), Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe (London 2018) 81–7.Google Scholar
van Middelaar, L., The Passage to Europe: How a Continent Became a Union (New Haven, CT 2013).Google Scholar
Miklóssy, K., ‘Lacking Rule of Law in the Lawyers’ Regime: Hungary’ (2018) 26 Journal of Contemporary European Studies 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Majorities and Minarets: Religious Freedom and Public Space’ (2016) 46 British Journal of Political Science 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., Constitution of Argentina: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. F., ‘Reconsidering Murdock: State-Law Reversals as Constitutional Avoidance’ (2010) 77 University of Chicago Law Review 1335.Google Scholar
Mody, A., Eurotragedy: A Drama in Nine Acts (Oxford 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möllers, C., Das Grundgesetz : Geschichte und Inhalt (Munich 2009).Google Scholar
Moloney, N., EU Securities and Financial Markets Regulation (Oxford 2014).Google Scholar
Monaghan, H. P., ‘Supremacy Clause Textualism’ (2010) 110 Columbia Law Review 731.Google Scholar
Monaghan, H. P., ‘The Confirmation Process: Law or Politics?’ (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review 1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monar, J., ‘Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor Perspective: From Cooperation to Integration in EU Criminal Justice?’ (2013) 14 Perspectives on European Politics and Society 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, C. and Lee, M.-H., ‘The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform 1956–82’ (2000) 62(1) Journal of Politics 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘Federalism in the European Union: Rhetoric and Reality’ in Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R. (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford 2001).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘In Defense of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’ (2002) 40(4) Journal of Common Market Studies 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘Negotiating the Single European Act’ in Keohane, R. and Hoffman, S. (eds.), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change (Boulder, CO 1991).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’ (1993) 31(4) Journal of Common Market Studies 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘Preferences, Power and Institutions in 21st‐Century Europe’ (2018) 56 Journal of Common Market Studies 1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A., ‘What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project?’ (2006) 47 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, G., The Single Currency and European Citizenship: Unveiling the Other Side of the Coin (London 2013).Google Scholar
Morwood, J. (ed.), Oxford Latin Dictionary: Latin–English, 3rd ed. (Oxford 2012).Google Scholar
Moull, D., ‘Lessons the EU Should Learn from the Formative Years of the US: Challenges to EU Authority in the Areas of Legitimacy and Interpretive Competence and the Implications for the Conceptualization of the EU’ (2004) 51 Jean Monet Working Papers in Comparative and International Politics, www.fscpo.unict.it/EuroMed/jmwp51.pdf.Google Scholar
Mourelo, E. L., Khatiwada, S. and Corley-Coulibaly, M., ‘Overview of Employment Trends and Projections’ (2013) World of Work Report 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J.-W., ‘Defending Democracy within the EU’ (2013) 24 Journal of Democracy 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Münch, I., Die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit: Vergangenheit, Gegenwart, Zukunft (Berlin 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Munch, I., Grundgesetz-Kommentar (Munich 1975).Google Scholar
von Münch, I. and Kunig, P., Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, 6th ed. (Munich 2012).Google Scholar
Murphy, W. F., ‘Civil Law, Common Law, and Constitutional Democracy’ (1991) 52 Louisiana Law Review 91.Google Scholar
Murray, H., Limiting Federal Powers: The Tenth Amendment (New York 2019).Google Scholar
Murray, P. and Longo, M., ‘Europe’s Wicked Legitimacy Crisis: The Case of Refugees’ (2018) 40 Journal of European Integration 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, C. I., The EU Bill of Rights’ Diagonal Application to Member States Comparative Perspectives of Europe’s Human Rights Deficit (The Hague 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedergaard, P., ‘Borders and the EU Legitimacy Problem: The 2015–16 European Refugee Crisis’ (2019) 40 Policy Studies 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C., ‘What Is Textualism?’ (2005) 91(2) Virginia Law Review 347.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. E., Marbury v. Madison: The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review, 2nd ed. (Kansas 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettesheim, M., ‘A Tribute to Professor Richard M. Buxbaum: Developing a Theory of Democracy for the European Union’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law 358.Google Scholar
Neuberger, D., ‘The British and Europe’, Annual Freshfields Lecture, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 12 February 2014, www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-140212.pdf.Google Scholar
Nicola, F., ‘The European Union 20 Years after Maastricht: Transatlantic Perspectives’ (2011) 20 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 65.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, K., ‘A View from the Ground Up’ in Barber, N. W., Cahill, M. and Ekins, R. (eds.), The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution (London 2019).Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, K., ‘Braving the Waves? Europe’s Constitutional Settlement at Twenty’ (2018) 56(7) Journal of Common Market Studies 1614, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R., The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nic Shuibhne, N., ‘Case C-361/01 P, Kik v. Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), (Kik IV)’ (2004) 41(4) Common Market Law Review 1093.Google Scholar
Nic Schuibhne, N., ‘What Is the Autonomy of EU Law, and Why Does that Matter?’ (2019) 88 Nordic Journal of International Law 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, G. (ed.), European and US Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, P., The Accidental Constitution: The Making of Europe’s Constitutional Treaty (Brussels 2005).Google Scholar
Oakes, L. and Warren, J., Language, Citizenship, and Identity in Quebec (London 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öberg, J., ‘The Rise of the Procedural Paradigm: Judicial Review of EU Legislation in Vertical Competence Disputes’ (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, F. W., ‘Baker v. Carr Abroad: The Swiss Federal Tribunal and Cantonal Elections’ (1962) 72 Yale Law Journal 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odermatt, J., ‘When a Fence Becomes a Cage: The Principle of Autonomy in EU External Relations Law’ EUI Working Paper MWP 2016/17.Google Scholar
Oechsli, W., Eden, P. and Cedar, P., History of Switzerland, 1499–1914 (Cambridge 1922).Google Scholar
Oh, C. H., Travis Selmier, W. and Lien, D., ‘International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Transaction Costs in Languages’ (2011) 40 Journal of Socio-Economics 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ólafsson, T. T. and Pétursson, T. G., ‘Weathering the Financial Storm: The Importance of Fundamentals and Flexibility’ in Beblavý, M., Cobham, D. and Ódor, L. (eds.), The Euro Area and the Financial Crisis (Cambridge 2011).Google Scholar
Oliver, P. C., The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand (Oxford/New York 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, P., Macklem, P. and des Rosiers, N. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (Oxford 2017).Google Scholar
van Ooyen, R. C., ‘Die Staatstheorie des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und Europa’ in van Ooyen, R. C. (ed.), Von Solange über Maastricht zu Lissabon (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppermann, K., ‘The Politics of Avoiding Referendums on the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2013) 35 Journal of European Integration 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgad, L. and Lepoutre, J. (eds.), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacquin, S., ‘Multilevel Governance and International Trade Negotiations: The Case of Canada’s Trade Agreements’ in Lachapelle, G. and Oñate, P. (eds.), Borders and Margins: Federalism, Devolution and Multi-Level Governance (Opladen/Berlin/Toronto 2018).Google Scholar
Palombella, G., ‘Whose Europe? After the Constitution: A Goal-Based Citizenship’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panara, C., ‘In the Name of Cooperation: The External Relations of the German Länder and Their Participation in the EU Decision-Making2010 6(1) European Constitutional Law Review 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, L., Pernice, I. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), Legitimacy Issues of the European Union in the Face of Crisis: Dimitri Tstsos in Memoriam (Baden-Baden 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, N. A., ‘Austerity-Based Labour Market Reforms in Greece vs Fundamental Rights in the Aftermath of the European Debt Crisis: An Analysis of Supranational and National Bodies’ Jurisprudence’ (forthcoming ) European Public Law 24, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3276880.Google Scholar
Papdopoulos, Y., ‘Eurozone Crisis Management and the Changing Nature of the Democratic Deficit in the European Union’ in Careja, R., Emmenegger, P. and Giger, N. (eds.), The European Social Model under Pressure (Wiesbaden 2020).Google Scholar
van Parijs, P., Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World (Oxford 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patberg, M., ‘Challenging the Masters of the Treaties: Emerging Narratives of Constituent Power in the European Union’ (2018) 7 Global Constitutionalism 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payandeh, M., ‘Constitutional Review of EU Law after Honeywell: Contextualizing the Relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 9.Google Scholar
Pech, L. and Scheppele, K. L., ‘EU Values Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU’ (2017) 19 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, P., ‘The Federal Structure: Kingdom, Regions and Communities’ in Craenen, G. (ed.), The Institutions of Federal Belgium: An Introduction to Belgian Public Law (Leuven 1996).Google Scholar
Perez, A. T., ‘The Federalizing Force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perju, V., ‘On the (De-)Fragmentation of Statehood in Europe: Reflections on Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde’s Work on European Integration’ (2018) 19 German Law Journal 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernice, I., ‘Europäisches und nationales Verfassungsrecht’ (2001) Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 60.Google Scholar
Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union’ (2002) 27 European Law Review 511.Google Scholar
Pernice, I., ‘The European Constitution’ (May 2001), paper presented at the 16th Sinclair House Talks in Bad-Homburg.Google Scholar
Perrin, B., ‘Challenges Facing the EU Network of Competition Authorities: Insights from a Comparative Criminal Law Perspective’ (2006) 31(4) European Law Review 540.Google Scholar
Perrone, F., ‘The Judicial Path to European Constitutionalism: The Role of the National Judge in the Multi-Level Dialogue’ in de Albuquerque, P. Pinto, Judicial Power in a Globalized World: Liber Amicorum Vincent de Gaetano (Cham 2019).Google Scholar
Pescatore, P., ‘Preface’ in Sandalow, T. and Stein, E. (eds.), Courts and Free Markets, Vol. 1 (Oxford 1982).Google Scholar
Peters, A., Elemente einer Theorie der Verfassung Europas (Berlin 2001).Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Global Constitutionalism Revisited’ (2005) 11 International Legal Theory 39.Google Scholar
Petric, D., ‘Game of Courts: A Tale of Principles and Institutions’ (2019) 25 European Law Journal 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyer, H. C., Verfassungsgeschichte der alten Schweiz (Zurich 1978).Google Scholar
Pfersmann, O., ‘The New Revision of the Old Constitution’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philadelphia Inquirer, The, ‘Pa. Court Rules Voters Can Cast Regular Ballots without ID’ (3 October 2012), http://articles.philly.com/2012–10-03/news/34219088_1_voter-id-law-commonwealth-secretary-carol-aichele-league-of-women-voters.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R., ‘Lingua Franca or Lingua Frankensteinia? English in European Integration and Globalisation’ (2008) 27 World Englishes 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piqani, D., ‘The Simmenthal Revolution Revisited: What Role for Constitutional Courts?’ in de Witte, B. and others (eds.) National Courts and EU Law: New Issues, Theories and Methods (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2016).Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C., The Constitution for Europe: A Legal Analysis (Cambridge 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piris, J.-C., The Future of Europe: Towards a Two-Speed EU? (New York 2012).Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C., The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis (Cambridge 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirro, A. L. P., Taggart, P. and van Kessel, S., ‘The Populist Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: Comparative Conclusions’ (2018) 38 Politics 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliakos, A. and Anagnostaras, G., ‘Saving Face? The German Federal Constitutional Court Decides Gauweiler’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poli, S., ‘The Common Foreign Security Policy after Rosneft: Still imperfect but Gradually Subject to the Rule of Law’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 1799.Google Scholar
Pollack, M. A., The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU (New York 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollicino, O., ‘European Arrest Warrant and Constitutional Principles of the Member States: A Case Law-Based Outline in the Attempt to Strike the Right Balance between Interacting Legal Systems’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 1313.Google Scholar
Pollicino, O., ‘The Conseil d’Etat and the Relationship between French Internal Law after Arcelor: Has Something Really Changed?’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 1519.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W., ‘The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives’ (1968) 62 American Political Science Review 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potvin, M., ‘Social and Media Discourse in the Reasonable Accommodations Debate’ (2010) Immigration and Diversity 78.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. B. and Yoo, J. C., ‘The Origins of Judicial Review’ (2003) 70 University of Chicago Law Review 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Příbáň, J., ‘Constitutional Sovereignty in Post-Sovereign Jurisprudence of the Czech Constitutional Court: From the Lisbon Judgments to the Landtová Ultra Vires Controversy’ in Bobek, M. (ed.), Central European Judges under the European Influence: The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited (Oxford 2015).Google Scholar
Puder, M. G., ‘Supremacy of the Law and Judicial Review in the European Union: Celebrating Marbury v. Madison with Costa v. Enel’ (2005) 36 George Washington International Law Review 567.Google Scholar
Puetter, U., ‘Europe’s Deliberative Intergovernmentalism: The Role of the Council and European Council in EU Economic Governance’ (2011) 19 Journal of European Public Policy 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, S., Dissertatio de Republica irregulari (Heidelberg 1668).Google Scholar
Puntscher Riekmann, S., Mokre, M. and Latzer, M. (eds.), The State of Europe: Transformations of Statehood from a European Perspective (Frankfurt 2004).Google Scholar
Quandt Stiftung, H., Europe’s Constitution: A Framework for the Future of the Union (Bad Homburg 2001).Google Scholar
Rabl, K., Stoll, C. and Vasold, M., From the U.S. Constitution to the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany [Von der amerikanischen Verfassung zum Grundgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland] (Munich 1988).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M., ‘Law Meets History: Interpreting the Van Gend en Loos Judgment’ in Nicola, F. and Davies, B. (eds.), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence (Cambridge 2017).Google Scholar
Rauchegger, C., ‘The Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Human Dignity Review: Solange III and Its Application in Subsequent Case Law’ in Violini, L. and Baraggia, A. (eds.), The Fragmented Landscape of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2018).Google Scholar
Redish, M. H., ‘Federal Judicial Independence: Constitutional and Political Perspectives’ (1994) 46 Mercer Law Review 697.Google Scholar
Reh, C., ‘The Lisbon Treaty: De-Constitutionalizing the European Union?’ (2009) 47 Journal of Common Market Studies 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, J., Biesenbender, J. and Holzinger, K., ‘Do Arguments Matter? Argumentation and Negotiation Success at the 1997 Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference’ (2014) 6 European Political Science Review 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, A., ‘Police Organization in the Twentieth Century’ (1992) 15 Crime and Justice 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Requejo, F., ‘Cultural Pluralism, Nationalism and Federalism: A Revision of Democratic Citizenship in Plurinational States’ (1999) 35 European Journal of Political Research 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, L. R., Constitutional Developments in Germany since 1945 (Hamburg 1994).Google Scholar
Reuters, ‘Italy’s Top Court to Rule on European Parliament Electoral Law’ 9 May 2014, www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/09/us-eu-election-italy-courts-idUSBREA480KM20140509.Google Scholar
Richardson, E. L., ‘Checks and Balances in Foreign Relations’ (1989) 83(4) American Journal of International Law 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffel, C., ‘The CETA Opinion of the European Court of Justice and Its Implications: Not That Selfish After All’ (2019) 22(3) Journal of International Economic Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rifkin, J., The European Dream: How Europe’s Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream (New York 2004).Google Scholar
Risse, T., A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres (Ithaca, NY/London 2010).Google Scholar
Risse, T., European Public Spheres (Cambridge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röben, V., ‘Constitutionalism of the European Union after the Draft Constitutional Treaty: How Much Hierarchy?’ (2004) 10 Columbia Journal of European Law 339.Google Scholar
Roederer-Rynning, C., ‘Parliamentary Assertion and Deep Integration: The European Parliament in the CETA and TTIP Negotiations’ (2017) 30 Cambridge Review of International Affairs 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, A., ‘The Interaction between the European Court of Justice and National Courts in Preliminary Ruling Proceedings: Some Institutional and Procedural Observations’ in Fabri, H. Ruiz (ed.), International Law and Litigation: A Look into Procedure (Luxembourg 2019).Google Scholar
Rosas, A. and Armati, L., EU Constitutional Law: An Introduction (London 2018).Google Scholar
Rose, R., ‘Referendum Challenges to the EU’s Policy Legitimacy – and How the EU Responds’ (2018) 26 Journal of European Public Policy 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., ‘Comparing Constitutional Review by the European Court of Justice and the U.S. Supreme Court’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., ‘The European Convention and Constitution Making in Philadelphia’ (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford 2012) 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, A. J. and Henkin, L., Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad (New York 1990).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, L. H. and Joseph, G. P., ‘Foundations of U.S. Federalism’ (2017) 101 Judicature 39.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. S., ‘“Same Legal Value as the Treaties”? Rank, Primacy, and Direct Effects of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roznai, Y., Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers (Oxford 2017).Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, J., Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional Law (Cambridge, MA 2005).Google Scholar
Rush, S. E., ‘Oh, What a Truism the Tenth Amendment Is: State Sovereignty, Sovereign Immunity, and Individual Liberties’ (2019) 71 Florida Law Review, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3259988.Google Scholar
Russell, P. H., ‘The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ (1983) 61 Canadian Bar Review 30.Google Scholar
Rutkus, D. S., ‘CRS Report for Congress: Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate’ (2005) US Department of State.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W., Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, F. and Zollinger, C., ‘The Swiss Political System in a Comparative Perspective’ in Trampusch, C. and Mach, A. (eds.), Switzerland in Europe (New York 2011).Google Scholar
Sajó, A., ‘Constitution without the Constitutional Moment: A View from the New Member States’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, A., ‘On Constitutional Identity and the Loyalties of the Constitutional Judge’ (2019) 40 Cardozo Law Review 3253.Google Scholar
Sandalow, T. and Stein, E., Courts and Free Markets (Oxford 1982).Google Scholar
Šarčević, S., Language and Culture in EU Law: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (London/New York 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarikakis, K. and Kolkytha, O., ‘EU Democratic Deficits: The EU Project and a European Public Sphere’, in Arnold, K., Preston, P and Kinnerbrock, S. (eds.), The Handbook of European Communication History (Hoboken, NJ 2019).Google Scholar
Sarmiento, D., ‘Who’s Afraid of the Charter? The Court of Justice, National Courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 1267.Google Scholar
Sbragia, A., ‘Post-National Democracy as Post-National Democratization’ in Fabbrini, S. (ed.), Democracy and Federalism in the European Union and the United States: Exploring Post-National Governance (Abingdon/New York 2005).Google Scholar
Scalia, A., A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton, NJ 1997).Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W., ‘Democratic Legitimacy under Conditions of Regulatory Competition: Why Europe Differs from the United States’ in Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R. (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford 2001).Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W., ‘Legitimacy Intermediation in the Multilevel European Polity and Its Collapse in the Euro Crisis’ in Armingeon, K. (ed.), Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie (Heidelberg 2013).Google Scholar
Schiffauer, W., Parallelgesellschaften: Wie viel Wertekonsens braucht unsere Gesellschaft?: Für eine kluge Politik der Differenz (Bielefeld 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., ‘Getting Around No: How Governments React to Negative EU Referendums’ (2019) 26 Journal of European Public Policy 1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Crises of the European Union’ (2018) 56 Journal of Common Market Studies 1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosser, P., Europe’s New Fiscal Union (Cham 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S. K., The European Court of Justice and the Policy Process: The Shadow of Case Law (Oxford 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V. A., Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities (Oxford 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V. A., ‘The Political Dynamics of EU Governance in Response to Crisis: Toward More or Less EU Legitimacy?’ (2017), www.democratic-anxieties.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Berlin-Paper-EU-political-dynamics-and-legitimacy.pdf.Google Scholar
Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S. B. and Popa, S. A., ‘Does Personalization Increase Turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’ (2015) 16 European Union Politics 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroth, P. W., ‘Marbury and Simmenthal: Reflections on the Adoption of Decentralized Judicial Review by the Court of Justice of the European Community’ (1978–1979) 12 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 869.Google Scholar
Schuck, P. H., ‘Citizenship in Federal Systems’ (2000) 48 American Journal of Comparative Law 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, T., Marchetti, A. and Demmelhuber, T. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighborhood Policy (Abingdon/New York 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R., European Constitutional Law (Cambridge 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R., From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law (New York 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R., ‘From Rome to Lisbon: “Executive Federalism” in the (New) European Union’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 1385.Google Scholar
Schütze, R. and Tridimas, T. (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law: Volume 1: The European Union Legal Order (Oxford 2018).Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., The Great Rights of Mankind: A History of the American Bill of Rights (New York 1977).Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. S., The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. Maryland (Oxford 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweiger, C., ‘The Legitimacy Challenge’ in Dinan, D., Nugent, N. and Paterson, W. E. (eds.), The European Union in Crisis (London 2017).Google Scholar
Scicluna, N., ‘When Failure Isn’t Failure: European Union Constitutionalism after the Lisbon Treaty’ (2012) 50 Journal of Common Market Studies 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamon, R. H., ‘Supreme Court Supremacy in a Time of Turmoil: James v. City of Boise’ (2017) 50 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 175.Google Scholar
Sedler, R. A., ‘Constitutional Protection of Individual Rights in Canada: The Impact of the New Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ (1983) 59 Notre Dame Law Review 1191.Google Scholar
Shalaby, O. and others, ‘Transparent Selection of Judges for EU Courts: Complaint to the European Ombudsman’ (2017) HEC Research Paper Series 1239, https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/heccah/1239.html.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M., ‘The European Court of Justice’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford 1999).Google Scholar
Shaw, J. and Wiener, A., ‘The Paradox of the “European Polity”’ in Cowles, M. G. and Smith, M. (eds.), The State of the European Union: Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival (Oxford 2000).Google Scholar
Sicakkan, H. G., ‘The Role of EU Policies in the Making of the European Public Sphere’ in Sicakkan, H. G. (ed.), Integration, Diversity and the Making of a European Public Sphere (Cheltenham/Northampton, MA 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemers, D. J., Ratifying the Republic: Antifederalists and Federalists in Constitutional Time (Stanford, CA 2004).Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., Stone Sweet, A. and Weiler, J., The European Court and the National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context (Oxford 1998).Google Scholar
Small, H. B., Chronicles of Canada, or a Concise History of the Leading Events in the Old Provinces of the New Dominion (Ottawa 1868).Google Scholar
Smeets, S. and Beach, D., ‘Political and Instrumental Leadership in Major EU Reforms: The Role and Influence of the EU Institutions in Setting-Up the Fiscal Compact’ (2019) 27(1) Journal of European Public Policy 63, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1572211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D., ‘National Identity and the Idea of European Unity’ (1992) 68(1) International Affairs 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Reinvigorating European Elections: The Implications of Electing the European Commission (London 2005).Google Scholar
Smith, R. M., Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in US History (New Haven, CT 1997).Google Scholar
Somek, A., ‘Postconstitutional Treaty’ in Miller, R. A. and Zumbansen, P. C. (eds.), Comparative Law as Transnational Law: A Decade of the German Law Journal (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
de Somer, M., Precedents and Judicial Politics in EU Immigration Law (Cham 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Z. and Zar, M. E., ‘European Parliamentary Elections and National Party Policy Change’ (2014) 47(6) Comparative Political Studies 878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowery, K., ‘The Nature and Scope of the Primary Law-Making Powers of the European Union: The Member States as the “Masters of the Treaties”’ (2018) 2 European Law Review 205.Google Scholar
Spevack, E., Allied Control and German Freedom: American Political and Ideological Influences on the Framing of the West German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) (Münster/Piscataway, NJ 2001).Google Scholar
Stein, E., ‘Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J., Why Switzerland? 2nd ed. (Cambridge 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A. (ed.), Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd ed. (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., ‘Judicialization and Supranational Governance’ in Shapiro, M. and Sweet, A. Stone (eds.), On Law, Politics and Judicialization (Oxford 2002).Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., ‘Judicialization and the Construction of Governance’ (1999) 32(2) Comparative Political Studies 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., ‘The Court of Justice’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., ‘The Structure of Constitutional Pluralism: Review of Nico Krisch, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Post-National Law’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. and Caporaso, J., ‘From Free Trade to Supranational Polity: The European Court and Integration’ in Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, A. (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance (New York 1998).Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. and Gehring, M., ‘Environmental Protection’ in Sweet, A. Stone, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stras, D., ‘Why Supreme Court Justices Should Ride Circuit Again’ (2006–2007) 91 Minnesota Law Review 1710.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., ‘The Crisis in Context: Democratic Capitalism and Its Contradictions’ in Streeck, W. and Schaefer, A. (eds.), Politics in the Age of Austerity (Chichester 2011).Google Scholar
Sundquist, J., Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States (Washington, DC, 1983).Google Scholar
Swaine, E. T., ‘Subsidiarity and Self-Interest: Federalism at the European Court of Justice’ (2000) 41 Harvard International Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Swenden, W., ‘What – If Anything – Can the European Union Learn from Belgian Federalism and Vice Versa?’ (2005) 15 Regional and Federal Studies 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, A. and Taggart, P. A., Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Vols. 1 and 2 (Oxford 2008).Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M. S., Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems (