Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-kc5xb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T15:17:30.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Overview: a framework for reproductive ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2009

Carson Strong
Affiliation:
Department of Human Values and Ethics, University of Tennessee Medical College, Memphis, USA
Donna L. Dickenson
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Medical professionals now face a growing number of controversial issues involving human reproduction. To illustrate the variety of issues, consider the following three scenarios. In the first case, involving a pregnant woman at 36 weeks of gestation, the obstetrician believed there was placental insufficiency, a condition in which the fetus was not getting enough oxygen. The doctor recommended Caesarean delivery for the fetus's sake, but the woman refused the Caesarean, stating that she was putting her faith in God that everything would turn out well. At that point, the physician considered seeking a court order authorizing surgical delivery without the woman's consent (In Re Baby Boy Doe, 1994). This case raises important questions. What is the moral standing of the fetus, particularly the fetus that is relatively advanced in gestation? What reasons can be given in support of assigning priority to the woman's wishes? Are there cases in which refusal of treatment by pregnant women may be justifiably overridden?

In another case, a research team was attempting to learn how to mature ova in vitro. In normal reproduction, ova undergo a maturation process that prepares them for fertilization, but the process is not well understood. If ova could be matured in vitro, then new sources of ova for assisted reproduction would be available. For example, ova could be obtained from donors whose ovaries have been removed as part of therapeutic surgical procedures. In that event, donors would not have to receive hyperstimulation drugs, which can have adverse side effects.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×