Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-01T02:16:50.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Truth, reason and the spectre of contingency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Kevin Ryan
Affiliation:
Lectures at the Department of Political Science National University of Ireland
Siniŝa Maleŝević
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Mark Haugaard
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Get access

Summary

Introduction: the open society

As a philosopher, sociologist and anthropologist, Ernest Gellner was resolute in his defence of reason and objectivity as the path to truth, perceiving both the infallibility of doctrinal beliefs and the epistemic relativism of postmodern thought as the enemies of the one true path to knowledge. Gellner developed his epistemology through an extended critique of Karl Popper, although it was also the case that his debt to Popper was never in question (see Gellner 1985; 1993a: xi–xviii; 1993b; 1994b). Popper himself described epistemic relativism as ‘a betrayal of reason and of humanity’ (Gellner 1993b), and yet he also seems to have shared a core concern with at least some thinkers gathered under the umbrella term of postmodernism. In particular I am thinking of how Popper's thesis, as set out in The Open Society (1962; 1966) and The Poverty of Historicism (2002b), resonates with Foucault's argument, derived from his reading of Kant, that we should engage in a ‘permanent critique of ourselves’, and that we should be suspicious of all ideas and conceptual frameworks that promise a final emancipation (Foucault 1984). In the case of Foucault, the rationalism so dear to Popper (and Gellner) would be among such conceptual frameworks, which is where an imagined conversation between these thinkers would probably terminate. I have found no evidence of direct dialogue between Popper and Foucault, but a little book published by Gellner in 1992 brought them into an interesting, though indirect, relation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthes, R. 1993 [1957]. Mythologies. London: VersoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckman, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Broberg, G. and Tydén, M. 1996. Eugenics in Sweden: Efficient Care. In Broberg, G. and Roll-Hansen, N. (eds.), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilisation Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. Michigan: Michigan University Press, pp. 77–149.Google Scholar
Castel, R., Castel, F. and Lovell, A. 1982 [1979]. The Psychiatric Society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. 1989. Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, B. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1981 [1871]. The Descent of Man. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1998 [1859]. On the Origin of Species. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1997 [1976]. Of Grammatology, corrected edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1972 [1969]. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977 [1975]. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Gordon, C.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1983. The Subject and Power. In Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P. (eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–26.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1984. The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, P.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1991. Questions of Method. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 208–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1994 [1966]. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1998 [1976]. The History of Sexuality, vol. I: The Will to Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2003 [1999]. Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France 1974–1975. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1975. Beyond Truth and Falsehood (Review Article on Paul Feyerabend's Against Method). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (4): 331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E. 1980. In Defence of Orientalism (Review Article on Bryan S. Turner's Marx and the End of Orientalism). Sociology 14 (2): 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E. 1982. The Paradox in Paradigms (Review Article on Barry Barnes’ T. S. Kuhn and Social Science). Times Literary Supplement. 4125, 23 April: 451–2.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1985. Relativism and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1992a. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E. 1992b. Reason and Culture: The Historic Role of Rationality and Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1992c. The Uniqueness of Truth. In his Anthropology and Politics: Revolutions in the Sacred Grove. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1993a [1985]. The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1993b. The Rational Mystic (Review Article on Karl Popper's In Search of a Better World). The New Republic, 19 April: 35–8.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1994a. The Last Marxists: Pretensions, Illusions, and Achievements of the Frankfurt School. Times Literary Supplement 4773, 23 September: 3–5.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1994b. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. London and New York: Allen Lane/Penguin.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984 [1981]. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol I: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.1999a. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, ed. Cronin, C. and Greiff, P.. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, J. 1999. ‘Popper and the Philosophy of Education’, Encyclopaedia of Philosophy of Education, www.vusst.hr/ENCYCLOPAEDIA/popper_and_the_philosophy_of_edu.htm, accessed 24.3.05.
Harding, S. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haugaard, M. 1997. The Constitution of Power. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Haugaard, M. 2003. Reflections on Seven Ways of Creating Power. European Journal of Social Theory 6: 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugaard, M.2006. Nationalism and Liberalism. In Delanty, G. and Kumar, K. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism. London: Sage, pp. 345–56.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 1991 [1944]. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heller, A. 1989. From Hermeneutics in Social Science: Toward a Hermeneutics of Social Science. Theory and Society 18: 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, D.2004. Applying Discourse Theory: The Method of Articulation. In Howarth, D. and Torfing, J. (eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 316–49.Google Scholar
Jacques, C. 1997. From Savages and Barbarians to Primitives: Africa, Social Typologies, and History in Eighteenth-Century French Philosophy. History and Theory 36 (2): 190–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J. 2001. Modernity and Exclusion. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitching, J. 1857. Lecture on Moral Insanity. British Medical Journal, 25 April: 334–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1996 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edn, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 1987. Post-Marxism without Apologies. New Left Review 166: 79–106.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 2001 [1985]. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Miller, P. and Rose, N. 1990. Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society 19 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1962 [1945]. The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. II. 4th edn, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1966 [1945]. The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. I. 5th edn, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 2002a [1935]. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 2002b [1957]. The Poverty of Historicism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. 1986. Representations Are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology. In Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E. (eds.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, pp. 234–61.Google Scholar
Rafter, N. H. 1988. White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies 1877–1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. 1985. The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1869–1939. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. 1983 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics, trans. Roy Harris. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean. 1999. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. 2nd edn, London: Profile.Google Scholar
Staten, H. 1985. Wittgenstein and Derrida. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Still, G. F. 1902. The Coulstonian Lectures on Some Abnormal Psychical Conditions in Children. The Lancet 1: 1008–12, 1077–82, 1163–8.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Torfing, J.2004. Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. In Howarth, D. and Torfing, J. (eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Walmsley, J. 2000. Woman and the Mental Deficiency Act of 1913: Citizenship, Sexuality and Regulation. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 28: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society, vol. I. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×