Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.711 Render date: 2022-10-02T04:43:37.616Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Jeffrey Fish
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Kirk R. Sanders
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta Méndez, E. and Angeli, A. (1992) Filodemo: Testimonianze su Socrate, La Scuola di Epicuro 13, Naples.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angeli, A. (1981) ‘I frammenti di Idomeneo di Lampsaco’, Cronache Ercolanesi 11: 41–101.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1988) Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola, La Scuola di Epicuro 7, Naples.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. and Colaizzo, M. (1979) ‘I frammenti di Zenone Sidonio’, Cronache Ercolanesi 9: 47–133.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1989) ‘Epicurean emotions’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 145–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Annas, J. (1992) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness, Oxford.Google Scholar
Annas, J.<008a> (2001) Cicero: On Moral Ends, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1993) ‘The addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean protreptic’, Materiali e discussioni 31: 185–230.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2004) ‘All things to all men: Philodemus’ model of therapy and the audience of De Morte', in Fitzgerald et al. 2004: 15–54.
Armstrong, D. (2006) Review of Warren 2004. Philosophical Quarterly 56: 294–7.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2008) ‘Be angry and sin not: Philodemus versus the Stoics on natural bites and natural emotions’, in Fitzgerald 2008: 79–121.
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2004) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, Austin.
Arndt, W., Danker, F. and Bauer, W. (2000) A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd edn, Chicago.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. (1960) Emotion and Personality, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1961) ‘Filodemo, De disiii, col. xii–xiii,20’, Studi classici e orientali 10: 112–21.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1973) Epicuro: Opere, 2nd edn, Turin.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1975) ‘L'Opera “Sulla natura” e le lettere di Epicuro a Erodoto e a Pitocle’, Cronache Ercolanesi 5: 45–51.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1979) ‘Un passo dell'opera “Sulla natura” di Epicuro, Democrito e Colote’, Cronache Ercolanesi 9: 5–10.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G., Kleve, K. and Auricchio, F. Longo (2002) ‘Dedica’, Cronache Ercolanesi 32: 5–6.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1981) ‘Lucretius’ explanation of moving dream figures at 4.768–76', American Journal of Philology 102: 138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990) ‘Philodemus’ Epicureanism', Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, pt ii, vol. xxxvi, no. 4: 2369–406.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1991) ‘Philodemus's poetic theory and On the Good King according to Homer’, Classical Antiquity 10: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1996) ‘Epicurean semiotics’, in Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices, ed. Manetti, G., Brussels: 155–85.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1999) ‘Epicurean epistemology’, in Algra et al. 1999: 260–94.CrossRef
Asmis, E. (2001) ‘The politician as public servant in Cicero's De republica’, in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 109–128.
Asmis, E. (2004), ‘Epicurean economics’, in Fitzgerald et al. 2004: 133–76.
Auvray-Assayas, C. (1992) ‘Le livre I duDe natura deorum et le traité De signisde Philodème: Problèmes de théologie et de logique’, Revue des Études Latines 69: 51–62.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. and D. Delattre (eds.) (2001) Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, Paris.Google Scholar
Aydede, M. (2000) ‘An analysis of pleasure vis-à-vis pain’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 537–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydede, M. (2006) ‘A critical and quasi-historical essay on theories of pain’, in Pain: New Essays on the Nature of Pain and the Methodology of Its Study, ed. Aydede, M., Cambridge, Mass.: 1–58.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le stoïcisme, Paris.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (2005) ‘Sur les dieux d’Épicure', Elenchos 26: 79–110.Google Scholar
Badian, E. and Lintott, A. W. (1996) ‘Pro consule’, ‘Pro praetore’, in Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edn, Oxford: 1248–49.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Balaudé, J.-F. (1994) Épicure: Lettres, maximes, sentences, Paris.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. (2003) ‘La pensée morale de Plutarque et le Περὶ ὀργῆς: Une nouvelle interpretation’, Humanitas 55: 89–110.Google Scholar
Beer, B. (2009) Lukrez und Philodem: Poetische Argumentation und poetologischer Diskurs, Basel.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Cives Epicurei: Les épicuriens et l'ideé de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave, Brussels.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2009) Review of Roskam 2007. Classical Review 59: 393–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignone, E. (1920) Epicuro: Opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita, Bari.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. (1936) L'Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, 2nd edn, Florence.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1998) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians (Adversus Mathematicos i), Oxford.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1999) ‘Reflections on re-reading Piaggio and the early history of the Herculaneum papyri’, Cronache Ercolanesi 29: 55–82.Google Scholar
Bockemüller, F. (1874) T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 2nd edn, Stade.Google Scholar
Bollack, J. (1975) La pensée du plaisir: Épicure, textes moraux, commentaires, Paris.Google Scholar
Bollack, J. and Laks, A. (eds.) (1976) Études sur l'épicureisme antique, Cahiers de Philologie 1, Lille.Google Scholar
Booras, S. and Seely, D. (1999) ‘Multispectral imaging of the Herculaneum papyri’, Cronache Ercolanesi 29: 95–100.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1955) ‘Sur une épitaphe épicurienne’, Revue des Études Latines 33: 113–20.Google Scholar
Braund, D. (1996) Ruling Roman Britain: Kings, Queens, Governors and Emperors from Julius Caesar to Agricola, London and New York.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.) (1997) The Passions in Roman Thought and Practice, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1996) ‘Epicurus on sex, marriage, and children’, Classical Philology 91: 346-52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, T. (2003) ‘Stoic moral psychology’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B., Cambridge: 257–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, F. (1896) De natura deorum, London.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1991) ‘Candidates defeated in Roman elections: Some ancient Roman “also-rans”’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 81: i–vi, 1–64.Google Scholar
Brown, E. (2009) ‘Politics and Society’, in Warren 2009: 179–96.CrossRef
Brown, P. M. (1997) De rerum natura iii, Warminster.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1987), ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield and Striker 1986: 113–44.
Brunschwig, J. (1993) ‘The Anaxarchus case: An essay on survival’, Proceedings of the British Academy 82: 59–88.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.) (1993): Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge.CrossRef
Brunt, P. A. (1989) ‘Philosophy and religion in the Late Republic’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 174–98.
Buckler, J. (1980) The Theban Hegemony 371–362 bc, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil's Augustan Epic, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canfora, L. (1993) Vita di Lucrezio, Palermo.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1988), Carneisco: Il secondo libro del Filista, Naples.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1989) ‘Primo supplemento al Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi’, Cronache Ercolanesi 19: 193–264.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1991) Manuale di papirologia ercolanese, Galatina.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. <067a> (2005) ‘L'intelettuale e il suo re’ (Filodemo, L'Adulazione, P. Herc 1675, col. V 21–32)', Studi di Egittologia e di Papirologia 2: 46–52.
Castagnoli, L. (2000) ‘Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 263–328.Google Scholar
Castner, C. (1985) ‘Difficulties in identifying Roman Epicureans: Orata in Cicero De fin. 2.22.70’, Classical Journal 81: 138–47.Google Scholar
Castner, C. (1988) A Prosopography of Roman Epicureans, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. (1972) ‘Epameinondas and Thebes’, Classical Quarterly 22: 254–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus ‘On Rhetoric’ Books 1 and 2: Translation and Exegetical Essays, New York.Google Scholar
Chadwick, J. (1996) Lexicographica Graeca: Contributions to the Lexicography of Ancient Greek, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1971) Review of D. West 1969. Classical Review 21: 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1981) The Noblest Roman, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1983) ‘Individual and community in the first generation of the Epicurean school’, in Gigante 1983b: vol. i, pp. 255–79. Reprinted in D. Clay, Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, Ann Arbor: 55–74.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. and Shartin, D. (eds.) (1988) Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. iv, Lanham.
Cooper, J. (2004) ‘Moral theory and improvement: Seneca’, in Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton: 309–34.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. and Procopé, J. (1995) Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1974) Roman Republican Coinage, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Creech, T. (1682) T. Lucretius Carus: The Epicurean Philosopher, His Six Books ‘De Natura Rerum’ Done into English Verse, with Notes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Creech, T. (1695) Titi Lucretii Cari De rerum natura libri sex; quibus interpretationem et notas addidit Thomas Creech, Oxford.Google Scholar
Creech, T. <081a> (1818) De rerum natura libri sex; quibus interpretationem et notas addidit Thomas Creech; variae lectiones iv. edd. antiquissimarum necnon annotationes R. Bentleii, Oxford.Google Scholar
Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos, Munich.Google Scholar
DeFilippo, J. G. and Mitsis, P. (1994) ‘Socrates and Stoic natural law’, in Vander Waerdt 1994: 252–71.
Lacy, P. and Lacy, E. (1958) ‘Epicurean ἐπιλογισμός’, American Journal of Philology 79: 179–83.Google Scholar
Lacy, P. (1978) Philodemus, On Methods of Inference, La Scuola di Epicuro 1, rev. edn, Naples.Google Scholar
Delattre, D. (2007) Philodème de Gadara: Sur la musique, livre iv, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Del Mastro, G. (2000) ‘Secondo supplemento al Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi’, Cronache Ercolanesi 30: 157–242.Google Scholar
Del Mastro, G. (2005) Chartes: Catalogo Multimediale dei Papiri Ercolanesi, Naples.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. (1950), The Greek Particles, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Places, E. (1973) Numénius. Fragments, Paris.Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Diano, C. (1942) ‘La psicologia di Epicuro e la teoria delle passione’, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 23: 5–49, 121–50.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci, Berlin.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1916) ‘Philodemus über die Götter: Erstes Buch’, Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1916, no. 7 (text and commentary), Berlin.Google Scholar
Diels, H. <093a> (1917) ‘Philodemus über die Götter: Drittes Buch’, Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1917, no. 4 (text) and 6 (commentary), Berlin.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1951) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th edn, 3 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1977) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 b.c. to a.d. 220, London.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1988) ‘“Orthodoxy” and “Eclecticism”: Middle Platonists and neo-Pythagoreans’, in Dillon and Long 1988: 103–25.
Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.) (1988) The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1988) ‘The history of the concept of eclecticism’, in Dillon and Long 1988: 15–33.
Dorandi, T. (1982) Filodemo: Il buon re secondo Omero, La Scuola di Epicuro 3, Naples.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994a) ‘I frammenti di Anassarco di Abdera’, Atti e memorie della Accademia toscana delle scienze e lettere 59: 11–58.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994b) ‘De Zenon d’Élée à Anaxarque: Fortune d'un topos littéraire', in Ainsi parlaient les Anciens – In honorem Jean-Paul Dumont, ed. Jerphagnon, L., Lagrée, J. and Delattre, D., Lille: 27–37.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1996) ‘Gaio bambino’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 111: 41–42.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2005) ‘Le philosophe et le pouvoir: Un cas de propagande inversée’, in L'Écriture publique du pouvoir, Études 10, ed. Bresson, A., Cocula, A. and Pébarthe, C., Paris: 27–34.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2003) Cicero: De Natura Deorum, Book i, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. (1972–99) Posidonius, 3 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2007) Death in Ancient Rome, New Haven.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1970) Studien zur Kosmologie und Theologie der Aristotelischen Schrift ‘Über die Philosophie’, Munich.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. (1962) Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy, New York.Google Scholar
Englert, W. (tr.) (2003) Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, Newburyport.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1987) Der Sinn der Aporien in den Dialogen Platons, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, M. (1992a) ‘Orthodoxie und Anpassung: Philodem, ein Panaitios des Kepos?’, Museum Helveticum 49: 171–200.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1992b) ‘Cicero und “unorthodoxer” Epikureismus’, Anregung 38: 307–22.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1992c) ‘Der Zorn des Helden: Philodems De ira und Vergils Konzept des Zorns in der Aeneis’, Grazer Beiträge 18: 103–26.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans: Wie die Epikureer die Schriften ihres Meisters lasen’, in Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, ed. Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J., Tübingen: 281–303.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1994) ‘Epikur – Die Schule Epikurs – Lucrez’, in Die hellenistische Philosophie, ed. H. Flashar, vol. iv of Die Philosophie der Antike, Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie, Basel: 29–490.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2001a) ‘Sokrates’ Rolle im Hellenismus', in Sokrates: Nachfolge und Eigenwege, ed. Kessler, H., Kusterdingen: 201–32.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2001b) ‘Response to Voula Tsouna’, in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 173–78.
Erler, M. (2002a) ‘Epicurus as deus mortalis: Homoiosis theoi and Epicurean self-cultivation’, in Frede and Laks 2002: 159–81.
Erler, M. (2002b) ‘Hilfe der Götter und Erkenntnis des Selbst: Sokrates als Göttergeschenk bei Platon und den Platonikern’, in Metaphysik und Religion, ed. Kobusch, Th and Erler, M., Munich and Leipzig: 387–414.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2003a) ‘To hear the right thing and to miss the point: Plato's implicit poetics’, in Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy, ed. Michelini, A., Leiden: 153–73.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2003b) ‘Exempla amoris: Der epikureische Epilogismos als philosophischer Hintergrund der Diatribe gegen die Liebe in Lukrez’ De Rerum Natura', in Le jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome, mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack, ed. Monet, A., Lille: 147–62.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2003c) ‘Das Bild vom “Kind im Menschen” bei Platon und der Adressat von Lukrez' De rerum natura’, Cronache Ercolanesi 33: 107–116.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2008) ‘Dire il nuovo in modo vecchio e il vecchio in modo nuovo: Gli spuria del Corpus Platonicum fra poetica e retorica ellenistica’, in Filologia, papirologia, storia dei testi: Giornate di studio in onore di Antonio Carlini, Udine, 9–10 dicembre 2005, ed. Carlini, A., Pisa: 225–41.Google Scholar
Erler, M. and Ungern-Sternberg, J. (1987) ‘Κακὸν γυναῖκες. Griechisches zu der Rede des Metellus Macedonicus “De prole augenda”’, Museum Helveticum 44: 254–56.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2005) ‘Un nuovo frammento di Ermarco nel PHerc. 152/157 (Filodemo, De dis, libro iii)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 35: 53–59.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2009) ‘Fälsche Götter bei Philodem (Diiii Kol. 8.5–Kol. 10.6)Cronache Ercolanesi 39: 161–206.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1997) ‘Epicureanism’, in From Aristotle to Augustine, ed. Furley, D., London: 188–221.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrington, B. (1967) The Faith of Epicurus, London.Google Scholar
Feldman, F. (1994) Confrontations with the Reaper: A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1990) ‘Epicureanism under the Roman Empire’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, pt ii, vol. xxxvi, no. 4: 2257–327.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. (1955) Epicurus and His Gods, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fillion-Lahille, J. (1970) ‘La colère chez Aristote’, Revue des Études Anciennes 72: 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le ‘De Ira’ de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions, Paris.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M. (ed.) (1993) The Metaphysics of Death, Stanford.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (1998) ‘Is Death Nothing to Horace?’, Cronache Ercolanese 28: 99–104.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (2004) ‘Anger, Philodemus’ good king, and the Helen episode of Aeneid 2.567–89: A new proof of authenticity from Herculaneum', in Armstrong et al. 2004: 111–38.
Fitzgerald, J. T. (ed.) (2008) Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought, London and New York.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D. and Holland, G. S. (eds.) (2004) Philodemus and the New Testament World, Leiden.Google Scholar
Florian, V. and Kravetz, S. (1983) ‘Fear of personal death: Attribution, structure, and relation to religious belief’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 600–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2002) Aristotle on Emotion, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W., Huby, P., Sharples, R. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Philosophia Antiqua 54, Leiden.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1986) Review of Dorandi 1982. Classical Review 36: 81–5.CrossRef
Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 120–50.
Fowler, D. P. (1997) ‘Epicurean anger’, in Braund and Gill 1997: 16–35.CrossRef
Frede, D. (1997) Philebos: Übersetzung und Kommentar, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) (2002) Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath, Leiden.Google Scholar
Frede, M. and G. Striker (eds.) (1996) Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar
Freymuth, G. (1953) Zur Lehre von den Götterbilden in der epikureischen Philosophie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, F. (1899) ‘C. Cassius Longinus’, Paulys Realenclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, 1st ser., vol. iii: 1727–36.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1977) ‘Lucretius the Epicurean: On the history of man’, in Lucrèce: Huit exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Furley, D. J. and Gigon, O., Geneva: 1–37.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1986) ‘Nothing to us?’, in Schofield and Striker 1986: 75–91.
Gale, M. (2001) Lucretius and the Didactic Epic, Bristol.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (1980) Frammenti biografici da papiri, vol.ii: La biografia dei filosofi, Rome.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (ed.) (1988) Aspetti dello stoicismo e dell'epicureismo in Plutarco, Ferrara, aprile 2–3 1987, Ferrara.Google Scholar
Gargiulo, T. (1981) ‘PHerc. 222: Filodemo sull'adulazione’, Cronache Ercolanesi 11: 103–27.Google Scholar
Gera, D. (1999) ‘Philonides the Epicurean at court: Early connections’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 125: 77–83.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1996) ‘Epicuro e l'ateismo antico’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996: vol. i, pp. 21–63.
Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) (1996) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993, 2 vols., Naples.Google Scholar
Gigandet, A. (1998) Fama Deum: Lucrèce et les raisons du mythe, Paris.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1979) Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi, Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1981) Scetticismo e epicureismo: Per l'avviamento di un discorso storiografico, Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983a) ‘Il ritratto di Filodemo nella Pisoniana’, in Gigante 1983c: 35–53.
Gigante, M. (1983b) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: Studi sull'epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante, 2 vols., Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983c) Ricerche Filodemee, 2nd edn, Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1992) Cinismo e epicureismo, Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici 23, Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1999) Kepos e Peripatos: Contributo alla Storia dell'Aristotelismo Antico, Naples.Google Scholar
Giussani, C. (1896–8) T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex: Revisione del testo, commentario e studi, 4 vols., Turin.Google Scholar
Glare, P.G. (ed.) (1982) Oxford Latin Dictionary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (2004) Lucretius, London.Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. (1864) Philodemi Epicurei De ira liber, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gosling, G. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. R. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, W. (1999) ‘Epicurus and the harm of death’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 358–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 1–37.
Griffin, M. (1999) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero's letters to his friends’, in Powell 1999: 325–46.
Griffin, M. (2001) ‘Piso, Cicero, and their audience’, in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 85–99.
Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1989) Philosophia Togata, Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1997) Philosophia Togata i, repr. of Griffin and Barnes 1989, with updated bibliography.
Grilli, A. (1983) ‘Diathesis in Epicuro’, in Gigante 1983b: vol. i, pp. 93–109.
Grimal, P. (1966) Cicéron: Discours contre L. Pison, Paris.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. (1992) ‘Der Schlußteil von Philodems drittem Buch über Rhetorik’, Cronache Ercolanesi 22: 9–117.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (2001) Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. (1897) T. Lucretius Carus De rerum natura: Buch iii, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Henry, W. B. (2009) Philodemus: On Death, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Hieronymus, F. (1970) Melete: Übung, Lernen und angrenzende Begriffe, PhD diss., Basel.Google Scholar
Hoelter, J. (1979) ‘Multidimensional treatment of fear of death’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47: 996–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holford-Strevens, L. (2002) ‘Horror vacui in Lucretian biography’, Leeds International Classical Studies 1.1 (www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/2002/200201.pdf).
Holler, E. (1934) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung, Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith (1983) Death and Renewal, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, including the Lives of Cato and Atticus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1995) Die Philosophie der Antike 3: Stoa, Epikureismus, und Skepsis, 2nd edn, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. (1978) ‘Epicurus’ attitude to Democritus', Phronesis 23: 80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) ‘The date of De rerum natura’, Classical Quarterly 51: 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indelli, G. (1988a) Filodemo: L'ira, La Scuola di Epicuro 5, Naples.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. (1988b) ‘Considerazioni sugli opuscoli “De ira” di Filodemo e Plutarco’, in Gallo 1988: 57–64.
Indelli, G and Laurenti, R. (1988) Plutarco: Sul controllo dell'ira, Naples.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. and Tsouna-McKirahan, V. [see V. Tsouna] (1995) [Philodemus]. [On Choices and Avoidances], La Scuola di Epicuro 15, Naples.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2005) Reading Seneca, Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. P. (1994) The Epicurus Reader, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Jackson-McCabe, M. (2004) ‘The Stoic theory of implanted preconceptions’, Phronesis 49: 323–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus, On Poems, Book One, Oxford.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2010) Philodemus, On Poems, Books Three and Four: With the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1977) ‘The ruling class of the Roman Republic and Greek philospohers’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 59: 323–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joly, R. (1956) Le thème philosophique des genres de vie dans l'antiquité classique, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kany-Turpin, J. (2007) ‘Les dieux: Représentation mentale des dieux, piété et discours théologique’, in Lire Épicure et les épicuriens, ed. Gigandet, A. and Morel, P.-M., Paris: 145–65.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1971) Lucretius: De rerum natura Book iii, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (ed.) and Waterfield, R. H. (tr.) (1992) Plutarch: Essays, London.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1961) ‘Wie kann man an das Nicht-Existierende denken?’, Symbolae Osloenses 37: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleve, K. (1963) Gnosis Theon: Die Lehre von der natürlichen Gotteserkenntnis in der epikureischen Theologie, Oslo.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1978) ‘On the beauty of God: A discussion between Epicureans, Stoics, and Sceptics’, Symbolae Osloenses 53: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleve, K. (1983) ‘Scurra Atticus: The Epicurean view of Socrates’, in Gigante 1983b: vol. i, pp. 227–53.
Kleve, K. and Del Mastro, G. (2000) ‘Il PHerc. 1533: Zenone Sidonio A Cratero’, Cronache Ercolanesi 30: 149–56.Google Scholar
Koch, R. (2005), Comment peut-on être Dieu? La secte d'Épicure, Paris.Google Scholar
Kondo, E. (1974) ‘Per L'interpretazione del pensiore filodemeo sulla adulazione nel PHerc. 1457’, Cronache Ercolanesi 4: 43–56.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1994) ‘Friendship from Epicurus to Philodemus’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996: vol. i, pp. 387–96.
Konstan, D. (1997) Friendship in the Classical World, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (2006) ‘Epicurean “passions” and the good life’, in The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, ed. Reis, B., Cambridge: 194–205.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2007) Lucrezio e la psicologia epicurea, tr. Ilaria Ramelli, Milan.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2008a) ‘Response’ to Pierre-Marie Morel, ‘Method and evidence (enargeia): Epicurean prolêpsis’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. xxiii, ed. J. Cleary and G. Gurtler, Leiden: 49–54.
Konstan, D. (2008b) A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., Clay, D., Glad, C. E., Thom, J. C. and Ware, J. (1998) Philodemus: On Frank Criticism, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Körte, A. (1980) ‘Metrodori Epicurei fragmenta’, Jahrbücher für Classische Philologie Suppl. 17: 531–97.Google Scholar
Krische, A. B. (1840) Die theologischen Lehren der griechischen Denker: Eine Prüfung der Darstellung Cicero's, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kuiper, T. (1925) Philodemus over den Dood, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1976) ‘Édition critique et commentée de la “Vie d’Épicure” dans Diogène Laërce (X, 1–34)', in Bollack and Laks 1976: 1–118.
Lamont, J. (1998) ‘A solution to the puzzle of when death harms its victims’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1866) Geschichte des Materialismus, Iserlohn.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. (1988) ‘Lo stoicismo romano e Plutarco di fronte al tema dell'ira’, in Gallo 1988: 33–56.
Lemaire, P. (1838) Titi Lucretii Cari De rerum natura libri sex, Paris.Google Scholar
Lemke, D. (1973) Die Theologie Epikurs: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion, Munich.Google Scholar
Leone, G. (1984), ‘Epicuro, “Della natura”, libro xiv’, Cronache Ercolanesi 14: 17–107.Google Scholar
Leone, G. (1987) ‘La chiusa del xiv libro “Della natura” di Epicuro’, Cronache Ercolanesi 17: 49–76.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. T. and Short, C. (1879) A Latin Dictionary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S. et al. (1996) A Greek–English Lexicon 9th edn, with rev. suppl. by H. S. Jones, with R. McKenzie, suppl. ed. P. G. W. Glare and A. A. Thompson, Oxford.
Long, A. A. (1986a) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics, 2nd edn, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986b) ‘Pleasure and social utility: The virtues of being Epicurean’, in Aspects de la Philosophie Hellenistique, ed. Flashar, H. and Gigon, O., Geneva: 284–324.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2001) Les philosophes hellénistiques, translation of Long and Sedley 1987 by J. Brunschwig and P. Pellegrin, 3 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. (1978) ‘La Scuola di Epicuro’, Cronache Ercolanesi 8: 21–37.Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. (1988) Ermarco: Frammenti, La Scuola di Epicuro 6, Naples.Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. and Tepedino Guerra, A. (1981) ‘Aspetti e problemi della dissidenza epicurea’, Cronache Ercolanesi 11: 25–40.Google Scholar
Luper, S. (2009) The Philosophy of Death, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luper-Foy, S. [see S. Luper] (1987) ‘Annihilation’, Philosophical Quarterly 37: 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luschnat, O. (1961/2) ‘Autodidaktos. Eine Begriffsgeschichte’, Theologia Viatorum 10: 156–72.Google Scholar
Mackey, J. L. (2006) ‘Saving the appearances: The phenomenology of epiphany in atomist theology’, Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics (www.princeton.edu/∼pswpc/pdfs/mackey/050601.pdf).
McKirahan, R. (1996) ‘Epicurean doxography in Cicero, De natura deorum Book i’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996: vol. ii, pp. 865–78.
McMahan, J. (2002) The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maehler, H. (1963) Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. (1985) ‘Tematica filosofica e scientifica nel Papiro Fiorentino 115: Un probabile frammento di Galeno In Hippocratis De alimento’, in Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, ed. Cavini, W., Macciò, M. C. Donnini, Funghi, M. S. and Manetti, D., Florence: 173–213.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1993) ‘Aspects of Epicurean theology’, Mnemosyne 46: 172–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1999) ‘Theology’, in Algra et al. 1999: 452–78.CrossRef
Manuwald, A. (1972) Die Prolêpsislehre Epikurs, Bonn.Google Scholar
Maslowski, T. (1974) ‘The chronology of Cicero's anti-Epicureanism’, Eos 62: 55–78.Google Scholar
Maslowski, T. (1978) ‘Cicero, Philodeus, Lucretius’, Eos 66: 215–26.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History, Leiden.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1987) ‘Epicurus on friendship and altruism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5: 127–53.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988a) Epicurus' Ethical Theory: The Pleasures of Invulnerability, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988b) ‘Epicurus on death and the duration of life’, in Cleary and Shartin 1988: 303–22.
Moles, J. L. (1996) ‘Diatribe’, in Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edn, Oxford: 463–4.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) ‘Epicureans in Revolt’, Journal of Roman Studies 31: 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, Journal of Roman Studies 55: 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. (1984a) Review of Dorandi 1982. Journal of Roman Studies 74: 235–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. (1984b) ‘Rileggendo il buon re secondo Omero’, Cronache Ercolanesi 14: 157–60.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (2007) ‘Philosophy and Monarchy in the Hellenistic World’, in Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers, ed. Rajak, T., Pearce, S., Aitken, J. and Dines, J., Berkeley: 13–28.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1970) ‘Death’, Nous 4: 73–80. Reprinted in Nagel 1979: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1979) Mortal Questions, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1992) ‘Pity and fear in the Rhetoric and the Poetics’, in Essays on Aristotle's Poetics, ed. Rorty, A. O., Princeton: 291–314.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. H. (1976) Epicurean Political Philosophy: The ‘De rerum natura’ of Lucretius, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1961) In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1978) A Commentary on Horace ‘Odes’, Book II, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, D. (1989) ‘The invulnerable pleasures of Epicurean friendship’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 165–86.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 187–223.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1992) ‘What all men believe – must be true: Common conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10: 193–231.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (ed.) (1995) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus: On Piety Part I, Critical Text with Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1997) ‘The mooring of philosophy’. Review of Indelli and Tsouna-McKirahan 1995. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 259–81.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2002) ‘“All gods are true” in Epicurus’, in D. Frede and Laks 2002: 183–221.
Obbink, D. (2004) ‘Craft, cult, and canon in the books from Herculaneum’, in Fitzgerald et al. 2004: 73–84.
Obbink, D. (Forthcoming) Philodemus: On Piety, pt ii, Oxford.
Ogilvie, R. M. (1978) The Library of Lactantius, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, T. (2010) Epicureanism, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Olivieri, A. (1914) Philodemi Peri Parrhesias, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism, Brussels.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2005) ‘Plutarch's Platonism revisited’, in L'Eredità platonica: Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo, ed. Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V., Naples: 163–200.Google Scholar
Paolucci, M. (1955) ‘Studi sull'epicureismo romano, i: Note al περὶ τοῦ καθ᾽ Ὅμηρον ἀγαθοῦ βασιλέως di Filodemo’, Rendiconti dell'Istituto lombardo di scienze e lettere 88: 483–511.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1994) Pagine stravaganti di un filologo, 2 vols., ed. Russo, C. F., Florence.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. (1955–58) M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum libriiii, 2 vols., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) (1988) Plutarch: Life of Antony, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1915) Review of Wilke 1914, Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 35: 645–52.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1916a) ‘Philodems Buch über den Zorn: Ein Beitrag zu seiner Wiederherstellung und Auslegung’, Rheinisches Museum 71: 425–60.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1916b) ‘Zur epikureischen Götterlehre’, Hermes 51: 568–608.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1918) ‘Nachträgliches zur epikureischen Götterlehre’, Hermes 53: 358–95.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1939) ‘Die Quelle der epikureischen Götterlehre in Ciceros erstem Buche De natura deorum’, Symbolae Osloenses 19: 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippson, R. (1940) ‘Des Akademikers Kritik der epikureischen Theologie im ersten Buch der Tuskulanen Ciceros’, Symbolae Osloenses 20: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (ed.) (1999) Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford.Google Scholar
Procopé, J. (1993) ‘Epicureans on anger’, in Philanthropia Kai Eusebeia: Festschrift für Albrecht Dihle, ed. Most, G., Petersmann, H. and Ritter, A., Göttingen: 363–86. Reprinted as Procopé 1998.Google Scholar
Procopé, J. (1998) ‘Epicureans on anger’, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T., Dordrecht: 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puglia, E. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali ed esegetiche in Epicuro, La Scuola di Epicuro 8, Naples.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus on the nature of the gods’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 181–231.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. (2002) Review of Santoro 2000. Classical Review 52: 267–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackham, H. (tr.) (1933) Cicero: De Natura Deorum, Cambridge, Mass.
Rawson, E. (1975) ‘Caesar's heritage: Hellenistic kings and their Roman equals’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic, London.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1986) ‘Cassius and Brutus: The memory of the liberators’, in Past Perspectives, ed. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J., Cambridge: 101–20.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1989) ‘Roman rulers and the philosophic adviser’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 233–57.
Reinhardt, T. (2002) ‘The speech of Nature in Lucretius’ De rerum natura 3.931–71', Classical Quarterly 52: 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2004) ‘Readers in the Underworld: Lucretius, De rerum natura 3.912–1075’, Journal of Roman Studies 94: 27–46.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2005) ‘The language of Epicureanism in Cicero: The case of atomism’, in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, ed. Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N., Proceedings of the British Academy 129: 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renehan, R. (1963) ‘Aristotle's definition of anger’, Philologus 107: 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringeltaube, H. (1913) Quaestiones ad veterum philosophorum de affectibus doctrinam pertinentes, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. (1986) ‘How to be dead and not care: A defense of Epicurus’, American Philosophical Quarterly 23: 217–25.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. (1990) ‘Epicurus on pleasure and the complete life’, Monist 73: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskam, G. (2003) ‘Being the physician of one's own soul: On a Plutarchan fragment on anger (fr. 148 Sandbach)’, Humanitas 55: 41–62.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2005), On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-) Platonism, Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007) Live Unnoticed (Λάθε βιώσας): On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D. (tr.) (1992) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura, revised by M. F. Smith, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Roy, J. (1994) ‘Thebes in the 360s b.c.’, in The Fourth Century B.C., vol. vi of The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd edn, pp. 187–208.CrossRef
Runia, D. T. (1996) ‘Atheists in Aëtius: Text, translation and comments on De placitis 1.7.1–10’, Mnemosyne 49: 542–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1973) Plutarch, London.Google Scholar
Russo, J., Fernández-Galiano, M. and Heubeck, A. (1992) A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey. Vol. iii: Books xvii–xxiv, Oxford.Google Scholar
Salem, J. (1989) Tel un dieu parmi les hommes: L'Ethique d'Épicure, Paris.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1930) ‘Ennoia and prolêpsis in the Stoic theory of knowledge’, Classical Quarterly 24: 45–51. Reprinted in Problems in Stoicism, ed. A. A. Long, London (1971).Google Scholar
Sanders, K. (2002) Natural Passions: Desire and Emotion in Epicurean Ethics, PhD diss., Austin.Google Scholar
Sanders, K. (2004) ‘Cicero De natura deorum 1.48–9: Quasi Corpus?’, Mnemosyne 57: 215–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, K. (2008a) ‘Mens and emotion: De rerum natura 3.136–46’, Classical Quarterly 58: 362–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, K. (2008b) ‘“Death” and “being dead”: Epicur. Sent. 2, Ep. ad Men. 124–5, and Phld. De morte 1.5–7’, La parola del passato 63: 427–8.Google Scholar
Sanders, K. <323a> (2009) ‘On a causal notion in Philodemus’ On Anger', Classical Quarterly 59: 642–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, M. (2000) [Demetrio Lacone]: [La forma del dio] (PHerc. 1055), La Scuola di Epicuro 17, Naples.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1990) Lukrez, der Kepos und die Stoiker: Untersuchungen zur Schule Epikurs und zu den Quellen von ‘De rerum natura’, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Schober, A. (1988) ‘Philodemi De pietate pars prior’, Cronache Ercolanesi 18: 67–125. (Diss. Königsberg 1923.)Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1996) ‘Epilogismos: An appraisal’, in M. Frede and Striker 1996: 221–37.
Schofield, M. (2000) ‘Epicurean and Stoic political thought’, in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Rowe, C. J. and Schofield, M., Cambridge: 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2007) Review of Benferhat 2005. Classical Review 57: 179–81.CrossRef
Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) (1986) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schorn, Stefan (2004) Satyros aus Kallatis: Sammlung der Fragmente mit Kommentar, Basel.Google Scholar
Schwiebe, M. W. (2003) ‘Sind die epikureischen Götter “thought-constructs”?’, Mnemosyne 56: 703–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. (1995) Recollection and Experience, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. (1883) ‘The physical constitution of the Epicurean gods’, Journal of Philology 12: 212–47.Google Scholar
Scott, W. (1885) Fragmenta Herculanensia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Scotti, A. A. (ed.) (1839) Herculanensium Voluminum quae supersunt tomus vi, Naples.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1973) ‘Epicurus “On Nature”, Book xxviii’, Cronache Ercolanesi 3: 5–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1976a) ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’, Cronache Ercolanesi 6: 23–54.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1976b) ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’, in Bollack and Laks 1976: 119–59.
Sedley, D. (1989) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 97–119.
Sedley, D. (1996) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996, vol. i, pp. 313–39. Reprinted with minor changes as Sedley 1998b.
Sedley, D. (1997) ‘The ethics of Brutus and Cassius’, Journal of Roman Studies 87: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (1998a) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (1998b) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Ethics, ed. S. Everson, Companions to Ancient Thought 4, Cambridge: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007) ‘Epicureanism in the Roman Republic’, in Warren 2009: 29–45.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad familiares, Volume 2, 47–43 bc, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1983) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Fate, London.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1996) Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. J. (1994) Socrates among the Skeptics, in Vander Waerdt 1994: 341–66.
Sider, D. (1997) The Epigrams of Philodemos, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2005) The Library of the Villa dei Papiri at Herculaneum, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Z. (1990) Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Z. (1993) Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions, Chicago.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. F. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, La Scuola di Epicuro, Suppl. 1, Naples.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (2001) (tr.) Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Smith, O. L. (1976) Scholia Graeca in Aeschylum quae exstant omnia, vol. i, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. (2004) ‘Lucretius’ progressive revelation of Nature in DRN 1.149-502', Phoenix 58: 260–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. (1993) The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life, rev. edn, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. and Calhoun, C. (eds.) (1984) What Is an Emotion? Classical Readings in Philosophical Psychology, 1st edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2000) Emotions and Peace of Mind, Oxford.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, F. A. (1967) Die Freundschaftslehre des Panaitios: Nach einer Analyse von Ciceros ‘Laelius de amicitia’, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Stenzel, J. (1961) Platon der Erzieher, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. (1995) ‘Cicero on Epicurean pleasures’, in Powell 1999: 145–70.
Striker, G. (1988) ‘Commentary on Mitsis’, in Cleary and Shartin 1988: 323–8.CrossRef
Strongman, K. T. (1987) The Psychology of Emotion, 3rd edn, Chichester.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution, Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2008) Always I Am Caesar, Malden, Mass.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus' ‘On Affections’: Reconstruction and Interpretation, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2001a) ‘Philodemus on the therapy of vice’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 233–58.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2001b) ‘Cicéron et Philodème: Quelques considérations sur l’éthique', in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 159–72.
Tsouna, V. (2003) ‘“Portare davanti agli occhi”: Una tecnica retorica nelle opere morali di Filodemo’, Cronache Ercolansi 33: 243–48.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2006) ‘Aristo on blends of arrogance’, in Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. and White, S., Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 13, New Brunswick, N.J., and London: 279–92.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007a) The Ethics of Philodemus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007b) ‘Philodemus on emotions’, in Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 bc to 200 ad, 2 vols., ed. Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R., Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 94, London: 213–41.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2009) ‘Epicurean therapeutic strategies’, in Warren 2009: 249–65.CrossRef
Unamuno, M. (1954) Tragic Sense of Life, New York.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea, Leipzig. Repr. Stuttgart 1966.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1977) Glossarium Epicureum, ed. Gigante, M., Rome.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.) (1994) The Socratic Movement, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Hoof, L. (2005) ‘Plutarch's De cohibenda ira and its model reader’, Plutarc a la seva època: Paideia i societat, ed. Jufresa, M., Barcelona: 501–6.Google Scholar
Hoof, L. (2007) ‘Strategic differences: Seneca and Plutarch on controlling anger’, Mnemosyne 60: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnim, H. (1903–5) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, 3 vols. Leipzig; vol. iv, indexes by M. Adler (Leipzig, 1924).Google Scholar
Fritz, K. (1972) ‘Zenon von Kition’, in Pauly-Wissowa's Realencyclopädie, 2nd ser., vol. x A: 83–8.
Vooys, C. J. (1933–41) Lexicon Philodemeum, vol. i (Purmerend 1934); vol. ii with D. A. van Krevelen (Amsterdam 1941).
Warren, J. (2000) ‘Epicurean immortality’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 231–61.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2004) Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2007) Review of Koch 2005. Classical Review 57: 338–9.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. (1969) The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1978) Hesiod: Works and Days, Oxford.Google Scholar
Westmann, R. (1955) Plutarch gegen Kolotes, seine Schrift ‘Adversus Colotem’ als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Wigodsky, M. (1995) ‘The alleged impossibility of philosophical poetry’, in Obbink 1995: 58–68.
Wigodsky, M. (2004) ‘Emotions and immortality in Philodemus On the Gods 3 and the Aeneid ’, in Armstrong et al. 2004: 211–30.
Wilke, K. (1914) Philodemi De ira liber, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973) ‘The Makropulos case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality’, in Problems of the Self, Cambridge: 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1971) New Men in the Roman Senate 139 bc – ad 14, Oxford.Google Scholar
Woodward, P. (1989) ‘Star gods in Philodemus, PHerc. 152/157’, Cronache Ercolanesi 19: 29–47.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1856–9) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, 2nd edn, 3 vols., Tübingen.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1870) The Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics, translation of Zeller 1856–9, vol. iii, by O. J. Reichel, London.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1883) Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie, 1st edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1890) Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy, translation of Zeller 1883 by S. F. Alleyne and E. Abbott, New York.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1923) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, vol. iii, pt i, 5th edn, revised by E. Wellmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1928) Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie, 13th edn, revised by W. Nestle, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1931) Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy, translation of Zeller 1928 by L. R. Palmer, New York.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. (1995) De re publica: Selections, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. (1999) Cicero: ‘On the Commonwealth’ and ‘On the Laws’, Cambridge.Google Scholar