Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T06:14:55.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Environmental justice and international trade law

from Part VI - Corporate activities and trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2009

Jonas Ebbesson
Stockholms Universitet
Phoebe Okowa
Queen Mary University of London
Get access



The aim of this chapter is to answer the question whether environmental justice could influence the trade–environment debate. At the outset, one needs to define the concept of environmental justice. Environmental injustice in this context occurs whenever some individual or group bears disproportionate environmental risks, or has unequal access to environmental goods. The issue of environmental (in)justice usually arises with respect to the localisation of hazardous plants close to poor urban communities or minorities. Given that they have fewer resources to defend their interests than richer communities, these poor neighbourhoods have less ability to challenge administrative decisions entailing environmental risks imposed on them. Understood in this sense, environmental (in)justice is largely an American concept, that has never really gained a strong foothold in Europe. Moreover, this topic is related more to polluting installations and access to natural resources than to free trade.

Thanks to the entry into force of the 1994 Marrakesh Agreement, free trade liberalisation in goods and services has been gaining momentum. The WTO provides not only the principal forum for negotiations on multilateral trading issues, its rules underpin to some extent the development of international as well as municipal environmental law. In this context, free trade has been sparking off heated debates also with respect to fairness as to the access to natural resources.

First, free trade has been criticised for widening the economic gaps between nations. Indeed, not every nation is taking advantage of the increase in trading in goods.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Birnie, P., and Boyle, A., 2000. International Law and the Environment. 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calster, G. V., 2000. International and EU Trade: The Environmental Challenge. London: Cameron & May.Google Scholar
Castri, F., 1996. ‘The Interactive Chain of Globalizations: From the Economic to the Ecologic One’, in Theys, J. (ed.), L'Environnement au XXIe Siècle. Paris: Germes.Google Scholar
Sadeleer, N., 2003. ‘Safeguard Clauses under Article 95 of the EC Treaty’. 40 Common Market Law Review889.Google Scholar
Sadeleer, N., 2007. ‘The Precautionary Principle in EC Health and Environmental Law: Sword or Shield for the Nordic Countries?’, in Sadeleer, N. (ed.), Implementing Precaution. Approaches from Nordic Countries, the EU and the USA. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
French, D., 2000. ‘The Changing Nature of Environmental Protection: Recent Developments Regarding Trade and the Environment in the EU and the WTO’. 47 Netherlands International Law Review1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, L., 2002. EU Casebook on Environmental Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Krueger, J., 1999. International Trade and the Basel Convention. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Kummer, K., 1995. International Management of Hazardous Wastes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kummer, K., 1999. International Management of Hazardous Wastes: The Basel Convention and Related Legal Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, K., 2000. Waste Trading Among Rich Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K., 2002. Environmental Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temmink, H., 2000. ‘From Danish Bottles to Danish Bees: The Dynamics of Free Movement of Goods and Environmental Protection – A Case Law Analysis’. 1 Yearbook of European Environmental Law291.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats