Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-s6gjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-26T22:46:18.167Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2019

Michael G. Faure  and
Roy A. Partain
Michael G. Faure
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Roy A. Partain
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Law and Economics
Theory and Practice
 , pp. 323 - 360
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Aalders, M., ‘Self-Regulation and Compliance with Environmental Law from a Global Perspective’, in Niessen, N. & Bedner, A. (eds.), Towards Integrated Environmental Law in Indonesia, Leiden, CNWS, 2003, pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
Aalders, M. & Wilthagen, T., ‘Moving beyond Command and Control: Reflexivity in the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Health and the Environment’, Law & Policy, 1997, Vol. 19(4), pp. 415–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbot, C., Enforcing Pollution Control Regulation: Strengthening Sanctions and Improving Deterrence, Oxford, Hart, 2009.Google Scholar
Abelson, P., Cost Benefit Analysis and Environmental Problems, Farnborough, Saxon House, 1979.Google Scholar
Abraham, K., ‘Environmental Liability and the Limits of Insurance’, Columbia Law Review, 1988, Vol. 88(5), pp. 942–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, K. S., ‘The Relation between Civil Liability and Environmental Regulation: An Analytical Overview’, Washburn Law Journal, 2002, Vol. 41, pp. 379–398.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. & Stewart, R. B., ‘Reforming Environmental Law: The Democratic Case for Market Incentives’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 1988, Vol. 13, pp. 171–199.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A., Rose-Ackerman, S., Sawyer, J., & Henderson, D., The Uncertain Search for Environmental Quality, New York, Free Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F. & Heinzerling, L., Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing, New Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Adams, M., ‘New Activities and the Efficient Liability Rules’, in Faure, M. & Van den Bergh, R. (eds.), Essays in Law and Economics: Corporations, Accident Prevention and Compensation for Losses, Antwerp, Maklu, 1989, pp. 103–106.Google Scholar
Adams, M. & Shavell, S., ‘Zür Strafbarkeit des Versuchs’, Goldammer’ Archiv für Strafrecht, 1990, pp. 337–86.
Adler, J.H., ‘Rent-Seeking behind the Green Curtain’, Regulation, 1996, Vol. 19(4), pp. 26–34.Google Scholar
Ahebwa, W., Van der Duim, R., & Sandbrook, C. H., ‘Private-Community Partnerships: Investigating a New Approach to Conservation and Development in Uganda’, Conservation & Society, 2012, Vol. 10(4), pp. 305–317.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G., ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, Vol. 84(3), pp. 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberini, A. & Austin, D., ‘Liability Policy and Toxic Pollution Releases’, in Heyes, A. (ed.), The Law and Economics of the Environment, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 92–115.Google Scholar
Alberini, A. & Frost, S., ‘Forcing Firms to Think about the Future: Economic Incentives and the Fate of Hazardous Waste’, Environmental & Resource Economics, 2007, Vol. 36(4), pp. 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, J., ‘The Use of Consumption Taxes to Re-launch Green Tax Reforms’, International Review of Law and Economics, 2006, Vol. 26, pp. 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, E., Koerner, C., & Solan, D., ‘Analysis of Liability Regimes for Carbon Capture and Sequestration: A Review for Policymakers’, Energy Policy Institute (2011).
Allen, D. W. & Lueck, D., ‘Risk Preferences and the Economics of Contracts’, The American Economic Review, 1995, Vol. 85(2), pp. 447–451.Google Scholar
Allen, D. W. & Lueck, D., ‘The Nature of the Farm’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 1998, Vol. 41(2), pp. 343–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpizar, F., Requate, T., & Schram, A., ‘Collective versus Random Fining: An Experimental Study on Controlling Ambient Pollution’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 2004, Vol. 29(2), pp. 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambec, S., Cohen, M., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P., ‘The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Comparativeness’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2013, Vol. 7(1), pp. 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcuri, A., ‘Controlling Environmental Risk in Europe: The Complementary Role of an EC Environmental Liability Regime’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 2001, pp. 39–40.
Arlen, J., ‘The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal Liability’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1994, Vol. 23, pp. 833–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlen, J. & Kraakman, R, ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’, New York University Law Review, 1997, Vol. 72, pp. 687–779.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., ‘A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare’, Journal of Political Economy, 1950, Vol. 58(4), pp. 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J., ‘The Origins of the Impossibility Theorem’, in Maskin, E. & Sen, A. (eds.), The Arrow Impossibility Theorem (Arrow, Kenneth J. Lecture Series), New York, Columbia University Press, 2014, pp. 143–148.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. et al., ‘Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity and the Environment’, Ecological Economics, 1995, pp. 91–95 (reprint from Science, Vol. 268, pp. 520–521).
Ashworth, A., ‘Is the Criminal Law a Lost Cause?’, Law Quarterly Review, 2000, Vol. 116, pp. 225–256.Google Scholar
Ault, R. W. & Ekelund, R. B., ‘Rent-Seeking in a Static Model of Zoning’, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 1988, Vol. 16, pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, R. U., ‘Economic Growth: Politically Necessary but Not Friendly’, Ecological Economics, 1995, Vol. 15(2), pp. 97–99. See http://engscisoc.pbworks.com/f/Ayres.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. & Braithwaite, J., Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Babbage, Ch., Passages from the Life of a Philosopher, London, Longman and Co., 1864.Google Scholar
Babbitt, C. J., Cory, D. C., & Kruchek, B. L., ‘Discretion and Criminalisation of Environmental Law’, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 2004, Vol. 15, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Ball, S. & Bell, S., Environmental Law, London, Blackstone Press Ltd., 1991.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., ‘Regulation Lite: The Rise of Emissions Trading’, Regulation & Governance, 2008, Vol. 2(2), pp. 193–215, available at: www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119423171/issue, also as Law Society Economy Working Papers, 3/2008, available at: www.lse.ac.uk/collection/law/wps/wps.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., Swanson, T. M., & Pearce, D. W., Elephants, Economics and Ivory, London, Earthscan, 1990.Google Scholar
Barboza, J., The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law, Nijmegen, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Barde, J.-P., ‘Environmental Policy and Policy Instruments’, in Folmer, H., Gabel, H. L. & Opschoor, H. (eds.), Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics: A Guide for Students and Decision-Makers, Aldershot, Edward Elgar Publishing, 1995, pp. 218–220.Google Scholar
Barral, V., ‘The Principle of Sustainable Development’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. J., ‘Sentencing Environmental Crimes under the United States Sentencing Guidelines: A Sentencing Lottery’, Environmental Law, 1992, Vol. 22, pp. 1421–1449.Google Scholar
Barrett, S., ‘An Economic Theory of International Environmental Law’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 231–261.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. & Oates, W. E., ‘The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment’, Swedish Journal of Economics, 1971, Vol. 73, pp. 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. & Oates, W. E., Economics, Environmental Policy and the Quality of Life, Prentice Hall, Angelwood Cliffs, 1979.Google Scholar
Bauw, E., Buitencontractuele aansprakelijkheid voor bodemverontreiniging, Deventer, Kluwer, 1993.Google Scholar
Bawcutt, P. A., Captive Insurance Companies, Establishment, Operation and Management, Oxford, Woodhead-Faulkner, 1991.Google Scholar
Baxi, U., ‘Introduction’ in Sathe, S. P., Judicial Activism in India, 2002, p. xvi.
Becker, G. S., ‘Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 1962, Vol. 70, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S., ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy, 1968, Vol. 76, pp. 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S., The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. & Henderson, J. V., ‘Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries’, Journal of Political Economy, 2000, Vol. 108, pp. 379–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, W., ‘Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment?’, World Development, 1992, Vol. 22, pp. 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S. & McGillivray, D., Environmental Law, 6th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bell, R. & Russell, C., ‘Environmental Policy for Developing Countries’, Issues in Science and Technology, 2002, Vol. 18, pp. 63–70.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. & Logue, K. D., ‘Outsourcing Regulation: How Insurance Reduces Moral Hazard’, Michigan Law Review, 2012, Vol. 111, pp. 197–248.Google Scholar
Bergkamp, L., De vervuiler betaalt dubbel, Antwerp, Intersentia, 1999.Google Scholar
Bergkamp, L., ‘The Commission’s White Paper on Environmental Liability: A Weak Case for an EC Strict Liability Regime’, European Environmental Law Review, 2000a, p. 5.CrossRef
Bergkamp, L., ‘The Proper Scope of Joint and Several Liability’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 2000b, pp. 153–156.
Bergkamp, L., Liability and Environment: Private and Public Law Aspects of Civil Liability for Environmental Harm in an International Context, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergkamp, L. & Van Bergeijk, A., ‘Scope of the ELD Regime’, in Bergkamp, L. & Goldsmith, B. J. (eds.), The EU Environmental Liability Directive: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 51–79.Google Scholar
Bergkamp, L., Herbatchek, M., & Jayanti, S., ‘Financial Security and Insurance’, in Bergkamp, L. & Goldsmith, B. J. (eds.), The EU Environmental Liability Directive: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 118–138.Google Scholar
Betlem, G., ‘It’s No Use Crying over Spilt Chemicals’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biener, Ch., Eling, M., & Wirfs, J. H., ‘Insurability of Cyber Risk: An Empirical Analysis’, The Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance, 2015, Vol. 40, pp. 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bier, L., Aansprakelijkheid voor bedrijfsongevallen en beroepsziekten, Deventer, Kluwer, 1988.Google Scholar
Bigano, A., Proost, S., & Van Rompuy, J., ‘Alternative Environmental Regulation Schemes for the Belgian Power Generation Sector’, Environmental & Resource Economics, 2000, Vol. 16, pp. 121–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billiet, C. M. & Rousseau, S., ‘De hoogte van strafrechtelijke boetes: een rechtseconomische analyse van milieurechtspraak (1990–2000) van het Hof van Beroep te Gent’, Tijdschrift voor Milieurecht, 2003, Vol. 2, pp. 120–134.Google Scholar
Billiet, C. & Rousseau, S., ‘De zachte rechtshandhaving in het bestuurlijke handhavingspoor: de inspectiebeslissing en het voortraject van bestuurlijke sancties. Een rechtseconomische analyse’, Tijdschrift voor Milieurecht, 2005, pp. 2–33.
Binder, S. & Neumayer, E., ‘Environmental Pressure Group Strength and Air Pollution: an Empirical Analysis’, Ecological Economics, 2005, Vol. 55, pp. 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgwell, C., International Law & the Environment, 3rd ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Blackman, A., ‘Columbia’s Discharge Fee Programme: Incentives for Polluters or Regulators?’, Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, Vol. 90, pp. 101–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluffstone, R. & Larson, B. A. (eds.), Controlling Pollution in Transition Economies: Theories and Methods, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Bluffstone, R. A. & Panayotou, Th., ‘Environmental Liability and Privatisation in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards an Optimal Policy’, Environmental & Resource Economics, 2000, Vol. 17(4), pp. 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocken, H., ‘Van fout naar risico’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 1984, pp. 329–415.
Bocken, H., ‘Alternatives to Liability and Liability Insurance for the Compensation of Pollution Damages’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 1987, pp. 83–87.
Bocken, H., ‘Alternatives to Liability and Liability Insurance for the Compensation of Pollution Damages’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 1988, pp. 3–10.
Bocken, H., ‘Systèmes Alternatives pour L’indemnisation des Dommages Du à la Pollution’, Revue Générale des Assurances et des Responsabilités, 1990, pp. 11698–11714.
Bocken, H., ‘Deficiencies of the System of Liability and Liability Insurance as a Mechanism for the Indemnification of Environmental Damage Suffered by Individual Victims’, in Bocken, H. & Ryckbost, D. (eds.), Insurance of Environmental Damage, Brussels, Story Scientia, 1991, pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
Bocken, H., Lambrecht, W., Boes, M. et al., ‘The Flemish Draft Decree on Environmental Policy: An Outline’, in Bocken, H. & Ryckbost, D. (eds.), Codification of Environmental Law, Proceedings of the International Conference, The Hague, Kluwer Law, 1996, pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
Boer, B., ‘Environmental Principles and the Right to a Quality Environment’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, P., ‘An Approach to the Problem of Estimating Demand for Public Goods’, Swedish Journal of Economics, 1971, Vol. 73, pp. 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohrenstein, S., ‘The Economics of Costly Risk Sorting in Competitive Insurance Markets’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1989, Vol. 9(1), pp. 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhringer, C., Koschel, H., & Moslener, U., ‘Efficiency Losses from Overlapping Economic Instruments in European Carbon Emissions Regulation’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2008, Vol. 33(3), pp. 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, A. T. & Spier, J. (eds.), De uitdijende reikwijdte van de aansprakelijkheid uit onrechtmatige daad, NJV Preadvies, Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 1996.Google Scholar
Bond, V., ‘The Cancer Risk Attributable to Radiation Exposure: Some Practical Problems’, Health Physics, 1981, Vol. 40, pp. 108–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Bongaerts, J. C. & Kraemer, R. A., ‘Water Pollution Charges in Three Countries: Control through Incentives’, European Environmental Review, 1987, Vol. 1(4), pp. 12–19.Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context, IUCN, September 1996, available at: http://portals.iucn.org, last accessed 29 November 2014.
Bowles, R., Law and the Economy, Oxford, Martin Robertson, 1982.Google Scholar
Bowles, R., Faure, M., & Garoupa, N., ‘Economic Analysis of the Removal of Illegal Gains’, International Review of Law and Economics, 2000, Vol. 20, pp. 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, R., Faure, M., & Garoupa, N., ‘Forfeiture of Illegal Gain: An Economic Perspective’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2005, Vol. 25, pp. 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, R., Faure, M., & Garoupa, N., ‘The Scope of Criminal Law and Criminal Sanctions: An Economic View and Policy Implications’, Journal of Law and Society, 2008, Vol. 35(3), pp. 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. & Kunreuther, H., ‘Retroactive Liability or the Public Purse?’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1997, Vol. 11(1), pp. 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. & Anderson, M. R., Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bradford, T., ‘Cost Benefit Analysis and Demand Curse for Public Goods’, Kyklos, 1970, Vol. 23, pp. 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, K., ‘Settling for Natural Resource Damages’, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2016, Vol. 40, pp. 211–251.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J., ‘Rewards and Regulation’, Journal of Law and Society, 2002, Vol. 29, pp. 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brans, E., ‘Fundamentals of Liability for Environmental Harm under the ELD’, in Bergkamp, L. & Goldsmith, B. J. (eds.), The EU Environmental Liability Directive: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J. M., The Power to Tax: Analytic Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Breton, A., Brozio, G., Dalmazzone, S. & Garrone, G. (eds.), Governing the Environment: Salient Institutional Issues, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretsen, S. N. & Hill, P. J., ‘Water Markets as a Tragedy of the Anticommons’, William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 2009, Vol. 33(3), pp. 723–783.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. A. & Heijdra, B. J., ‘Rent-Seeking and Pollution Taxation: An Extension’, Southern Economic Journal, 1987, Vol. 54(2), pp. 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. P., ‘Toward an Economic Theory of Liability’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1973, Vol. 2(2), pp. 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. P. & Holahan, W. L., ‘Taxes and Legal Rules for the Control of Externalities When There Are Strategic Responses’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1980, Vol. 9, pp. 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. M. Jr. & Johnson, R. W., ‘Pollution Control by Effluent Charges: It Works in the Federal Republic of Germany, Why Not in the US?’, Natural Resources Journal, 1984, Vol. 24, pp. 929–966.Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G., ‘Liability for Water Pollution under German Law: Fault or Strict Liability’, in Van Dunné, J. (ed.), Transboundary Pollution and Liability: The Case of the River Rhine, Lelystad, Vermande, 1991, pp. 85–91.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. & Tullock, G., The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. & Tullock, G., ‘Polluters’ Profits and Political Response: Direct Controls versus Taxes’, American Economic Review, 1975, Vol. 65, pp. 139–147.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., Tollison, R. & Tullock, G. (eds.), Toward a Theory of the Rent Seeking Society, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. & Yoon, Y. J., ‘Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 2000, Vol. 43(1), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, P., ‘Combining Regulation and Liability for the Control of External Costs’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1999, Vol. 19, pp. 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtraw, D. & Palmer, K., ‘SO2 Cap-and-Trade Programme in the United States: A “Living Legend” of Market Effectiveness’, in Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. D., & Sterner, Th. (eds.), Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe, Washington, DC, Resources for the Future, 2004, pp. 41–66.Google Scholar
Buzbee, W. W., ‘Regulatory Strategy Diversity in United States Environmental Law’, in Paddock, L. C., Glicksman, R., & Bryner, N. (eds.), Decision-Making in Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2016, pp. 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G., The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G., ‘Optimal Deterrence and Accidents’, Yale Law Journal, 1975a, Vol. 84, pp. 656–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G., ‘Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts: An Essay for Harry Kalven, Jr.’, University of Chicago Law Review, 1975b, Vol. 43(1), pp. 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G. & Melamed, D., ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’, Harvard Law Review, 1972, Vol. 85(6), pp. 1089–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Tort Law as Regulation’, Common Law World Review, 2002, Vol. 31, pp. 305–331.Google Scholar
Carson, R. L., Silent Spring, Boston, Mariner Books, Houghton Mifflin, 1962.Google Scholar
Casella, A. & Frey, B., ‘Federalism and Clubs: Towards an Economic Theory of Overlapping Political Jurisdiction’, European Economic Review, 1992, Vol. 36(2–3), pp. 639–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, J. M., ‘A Critical Examination of the Environmental Jurisprudence of the Courts of India’, Albany Law Environmental Outlook Journal, 2005, Vol. 10, pp. 197–228.Google Scholar
Chelius, J. R., ‘Liability for Industrial Accidents: A Comparison of Negligence and Strict Liability Systems’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1976, Vol. 5, pp. 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, Vol. 3, pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocker, A. & Richards, C., Valuing the Environment, Economic Approaches to Environmental Evaluation, London, Bellhaven Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Coelho, Ph. R. P., ‘Polluters’ Profits and Political Response: Direct Control versus Taxes: Comment’, American Economic Review, 1976, Vol. 66, pp. 976–978.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. S., ‘Corporate Crime and Punishment: A Non-Chicago View of the Economics of Criminal Sanctions’, American Criminal Law Review, 1980, Vol. 17, pp. 419–476.Google Scholar
Coghlin, T. G., ‘Protection and Indemnity Clubs’, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 1984, Vol. 11, pp. 403–416.Google Scholar
Coglianese, C. & Nash, J., ‘The Law of the Test: Performance-Based Regulation and Diesel Emissions Control’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 2017, Vol. 34, pp. 33–90.Google Scholar
Cohen, M., ‘Commentary’, in Ehrling, E. & Van den Bergh, R. (eds.), Law and Economics of the Environment, Oslo, Juridisk, 1996, pp. 167–171.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., ‘Empirical Research on the Deterrent Effect of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement’, Environmental Law Reporter, 2000, Vol. 30, pp. 10.245–10.252.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., ‘Criminal Law as an Instrument of Environmental Policy: Theory and Empirics’, in Heyes, A. (ed.), Law and Economics of the Environment, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 198–216.Google Scholar
Cole, D. H., ‘The “Stern Review” and Its Critics: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Benefit-Cost Analysis’, Natural Resources Journal, 2008, Vol. 48, pp. 53–90.Google Scholar
Cole, D. H., ‘Property Creation by Regulation: Rights to Clean Air and Rights to Pollute’, in Cole, D. H. & Ostrom, E. (eds.), Property in Land and Other Resources, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2011, pp. 125–155.Google Scholar
Cole, D. H. & Grossman, P. Z., ‘When is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection’, in Helfand, G. E. & Berck, P. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Command and Control in Environmental Policy, Oxon, Routledge, 2018, pp. 115–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., & Bates, J. M., ‘The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis’, Environment and Development Economics, 1997, Vol. 2(4), pp. 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conniff, R., ‘The Political History of Cap and Trade: How an Unlikely Mix of Environmentalists and Free-Market Conservatives Hammered out the Strategy Known as Cap-and-Trade’, Smithsonian, 2009, available at: http://smitsonianmag.com/science-nature/Presence-of-Mind-Blue-Sky-Thinking.html.
Cooter, R. D., ‘Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages’, Southern California Law Review, 1982, Vol. 56, pp. 97–101.Google Scholar
Cooter, R., ‘Prices and Sanctions’, Columbia Law Review, 1984, Vol. 84, pp. 1343–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R. E., ‘Expressive Law and Economics’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1998, Vol. 27, pp. 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R. & Ulen, T., Law and Economics, 3rd ed., Illinois, Glenview, 2000.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. D. & Ulen, T., Law and Economics, 4th ed., Boston, MA, Addison Wesley, 2004.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. & Ulen, T., Law and Economics, 5th ed., Boston, Addison Wesley, 2008.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. & Ulen, Th., Law and Economics, International Edition, 6th ed., Boston, Pearson, 2012.Google Scholar
Cortenraad, W. H. F. M., The Corporate Paradox, Economic Realities of the Corporate Form of Organisation, Boston, Kluwer Academic, 1999.Google Scholar
Cousy, H. A., ‘Recent Developments in Environmental Insurance’, in Abraham, F., et al. (eds.), Recent Economic and Legal Developments in European Environmental Policy, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1995, pp. 235–237.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. D., ‘Economies of Scale in Independent Insurance Agencies’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1977, Vol. 44(4), pp. 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, J., Pollution, Property and Prices: An Essay in Policy, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Dam, K. W., The Law-Growth Nexus: The Rule of Law and Economic Development, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2006a.Google Scholar
Dam, S., ‘Green Laws for Better Health: The Past That Was and the Future That May Be – Reflections from the Indian Experience’, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 2004, Vol. 16(4), pp. 593–615.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D., ‘Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, Vol. 16, pp. 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. K., ‘Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem’, National Resources Journal, 1963, Vol. 3, pp. 239–249.Google Scholar
Davis, C. M., Maritime Law Deskbook, Burlington, WA, Compass Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Deacon, R. T., ‘Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries’, Land Economics, 1994, Vol. 70(4), pp. 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Alessi, M., ‘Private Conservation and Black Rhinos in Zimbabwe: The Savé Valley and Bubiana Conservancies’ 1999, available at: www.cei.org, last accessed 26 March 2015.
De Boer, J., ‘Risicoaansprakelijkheid voor gevaarlijke stoffen en milieuverontreiniging’, Nederlands Juristenblad, 1993, p. 225.
De Bruyn, S. M., ‘Explaining the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Structural Change and International Agreements in Reducing Sulphur Emissions’, Environment and Development Economics, 1997, Vol. 2(4), pp. 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Geest, G. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 2nd ed., Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P., ‘Political Economy of the Choice of Environmental Policy Instruments in the EC’, in Abraham, F., Deketelaere, K., & Stuyck, J. (eds.), Recent Economic Legal Developments in European Environmental Policy, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1995, pp. 111–168.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H., ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review, 1967, Vol. 57(2), pp. 347–359.Google Scholar
Depoorter, B., ‘Horizontal Political Externalities: The Supply and Demand of Disaster Management’, Duke Law Journal, 2006, Vol. 56, pp. 101–125.Google Scholar
De Putter, P. & Verschuuren, J., ‘Een milieuschadefonds in Nederland?’, Milieu en Recht, 1995, Vol. 5, pp. 96–99.Google Scholar
De Sadeleer, N., Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sadeleer, N., ‘The Precautionary Principle and Climate Change’, in Farber, D. A. & Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2016, pp. 20–31.Google Scholar
De Sepius, J., ‘The European Emission Trading Scheme Put to the Test of State Aid Rules’, NCCR Trading regulation working paper 2007/34, available at: http://papers.ssrn/com/so3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1088716.CrossRef
Dewees, D. N., ‘Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy’, Economic Inquiry, 1983, Vol. 21, pp. 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewees, D., The Comparative Efficacy of Tort Law and Regulation for Environmental Protection, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1992a, pp. 446–467.CrossRef
Dewees, D., ‘Tort Law and the Deterrence of Environmental Pollution’, in Tietenberg, T. H. (ed.), Innovation in Environmental Policy: Economic and Legal Aspects of Recent Developments in Environmental Enforcement and Liability, Aldershot, Edward Elgar, 1992b, pp. 139–164.Google Scholar
Dewees, D., Duff, D., & Trebilcock, M., Exploring the Domain of Accident Law: Taking the Facts Seriously, New York, Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
Diamond, P., ‘Single Activity Accidents’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1974, Vol. 70(1), pp. 107–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, A., ‘Judicial Activism in the Development and Enforcement of Environmental Law: Some Comparative Insights from the Indian Experience’, Journal of Environmental Law, 1994, Vol 6(2), pp. 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divan, S. & Rosencranz, A., Environmental Law and Policy in India, 2nd ed., India, Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dodson, G., ‘Co-governance and Local Empowerment? Conservation Partnership Frameworks and Marine Protection at Mimiwhangata, New Zealand’, Society & Natural Resources, 2014, Vol. 27, pp. 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommering-Van Rongen, L., Schade Vergoeden door Fondsvorming, Deventer, Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar
Dornau, R., ‘The Emissions Trading Scheme of the European Union’, in Freestone, D. & Streck, C. (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Kyoto Protocol Mechanisms, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 412–425.Google Scholar
Doucette, J. E., ‘Wading in the Pool: Interlocal Cooperation in Municipal Insurance and the State Regulation of Public Entity Risk Sharing Pools – A Survey’, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 2001, Vol. 8, pp. 533–547.Google Scholar
Douma, W. Th., Massai, L., & Montini, M. (eds.), The Kyoto Protocol and Beyond: Legal and Policy Challenges of Climate Change, The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, T., Global Developments in Captive Insurance, Brussels, FT Energy, 1997.Google Scholar
Downing, P. B., ‘A Political Economy Model of Implementing Pollution Laws’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989, Vol. 8, pp. 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesen, D. M., ‘The Ends and Means of Pollution Control: Toward a Positive Theory of Environmental Law’, Utah Law Review, 2017, Vol. 2017(1), pp. 57–113.Google Scholar
Drupsteen, Th. G., Milieurecht, 2nd ed., Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 1991.Google Scholar
Dubin, J. A. & Rothwell, G. S., ‘Subsidy to Nuclear Power through Price-Anderson Liability Limit’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 1990, Vol. 8(3), pp. 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvic-Paoli, L. A., ‘Principle of Prevention’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earnhart, D., ‘Liability for Past Environmental Contamination and Privatisation’, Environmental & Resource Economics, 2004, Vol. 29, pp. 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, F., ‘Criminal Procedure as a Market System’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1983, Vol. 12, pp. 289–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, H., ‘Inspections, Warnings, and Compliance: The Case of Petroleum Storage Regulation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, Vol. 47, pp. 232–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertson, T., ‘Analyzing Institutional Successes and Failures: A Millennium of Common Mountain Pastures in Iceland’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1992, Vol. 12(4), pp. 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, I. & Posner, R., ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Rule-Making’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1974, Vol. 3, pp. 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichner, T. & Pethig, R., ‘EU-Type Carbon Emissions Trade and the Distributional Impact of Overlapping Emissions Taxes’, CESifo Working Paper No. 2579, 2009.
Ellerman, A. D., ‘The US SO2 Cap-and-Trade Programme’, in Tradable Permits: Policy Evaluation, Design, and Reform, Paris, OECD, 2004, pp. 71–97.Google Scholar
Ellerman, A. D., ‘US Experience with Emissions Trading: Lessons for CO2 Emissions Trading’, in Hansjürgens, B. (ed.), Emissions Trading for Climate Policy: US and European Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerman, A. D., ‘Are Cap-and-Trade Programs more Environmentally Effective than Conventional Regulation’, in Freeman, J. & Kolstad, Ch. D. (eds.), Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from 20 Years of Experience, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
Ellerman, A. D., Joskow, P. L., Schmalensee, R., Montero, J. P., & Bailey, E., Markets for Clean Air: The US Acid Rain Program, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R., ‘Alternatives to Zoning. Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls’, University of Chicago Law Review, 1973, Vol. 40(4), pp. 681–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELNI, The Role and Effects of Environmental Agreements In Environmental Policies, London, Cameron May, 1998.
Endres, A., Environmental Economics: Theory and Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endres, A., Environmental Economics: Theory and Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Endres, A. & Schwarze, R., ‘Allokationswirkungen einer Umwelthaftpflicht-versicherung’, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 1991, Vol. 14, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Endres, A. & Staiger, B., ‘Ökonomische Aspekte des Umwelthaftungsrecht’, in Ahrens, M. & Simon, J. (eds.), Umwelthaftung, Risikosteuerung und Versicherung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1996, pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
Engel, E., Die Production und Consumptionverhältnisse des Konigreich Sachsen, 1857.
Engel, K. H., ‘State Environmental Standard Setting: Is There a “Race” and Is It “to the Bottom”?’, Hastings Law Journal, 1997, Vol. 48, pp. 271–398.Google Scholar
Epstein, R., ‘A Theory of Strict Liability’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1973, Vol. 2, pp. 151–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R., ‘Nuisance Law: Corrective Justice and Its Utilitarian Constraints’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1979, Vol. 8(1), pp. 49–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. A., ‘From Common Law to Environmental Protection: How the Modern Environmental Movement Has Lost Its Way’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 2016, Vol. 23(1), pp. 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R., Gregory, Ch., & Kalven, H., Cases and Materials on Torts, 4th ed., Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Eskridge, W. N. Jr., ‘Politics without Romance: Implications of Public Choice Theory for Statutory Interpretation’, Virginia Law Review, 1988, Vol. 74, pp. 275–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estep, E., ‘Radiation Injuries and Statistics: The Need for a New Approach to Injury Litigation’, Michigan Law Review, 1960, Vol. 59, pp. 259–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D., ‘Revitalising Environmental Federalism’, Michigan Law Review, 1996, Vol. 95, pp. 570–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D., ‘Economic Integration and the Environment’, in Vig, N. & Axelrod, R. (eds.), The Global Environment: Institutions, Law and Policy, Washington, DC, CQ Press, 1999, pp. 190–209.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C., ‘Red Lights to Green Lights: From 20th Century Environmental Regulation to 21st Century Sustainability’, Environmental Law, 2017, Vol. 47(1), pp. 1–80.Google Scholar
Esty, D. & Geradin, D., ‘Market Access, Competitiveness and Harmonisation: Environmental Protection in Regional Trade Agreements’, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 1997, Vol. 21(2), pp. 265–336.Google Scholar
Esty, D. & Gerardin, D., ‘Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness: A Conceptual Framework’, Journal of World Trade, 1998, Vol. 32(3), pp. 5–46.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C. & Porter, M. E., ‘Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness: Strategic Implications for the Firm’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1998, Vol. 2(1), pp. 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D. C. & Porter, M. E., ‘Ranking National Environmental Regulation and Performance: A Leading Indicator of Future Competitiveness’, The Global Competitiveness Report 2002 (2001), pp. 78–100.
Esty, D. C. & Porter, M. E., ‘National Environmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Policy Results and Determinants’, Environment and Development Economics, 2005, Vol. 10, pp. 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Council Directive Amending Directive 2003/93/EC Restructuring the Community Framework for the Taxation of Energy Products and Electricity’, Brussels, COM(2011) 169/3.
European Group on Tort Law, Principles of European Tort Law, Text and Commentary, Vienna, Springer, 2005.
Ewenczyk, A., ‘For a Fistful of Dollars: Quick Compensation and Procedural Rights in the Aftermath of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill’, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 2013, Vol. 44(3), p. 267.Google Scholar
Farber, D., ‘Addressing Externalities: A Modest Proposal – How to Make Health and Safety a Personal Priority for Industry Officials’, Legal Planet, University of California at Berkeley, 19 October 2015, available at: http://legal-planet.org/2015/10/19/addressing-externalities-a-modest-proposal/
Fagotto, E., Industry Food Safety Standards: Public and Private Interests in Food Safety, diss., Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2015.Google Scholar
Faure, M.G., (G)een Schijn van Kans: Beschouwingen over het Statistisch Causaliteitsbewijs bij Milieugezondheidsschade, Inaugural lecture Maastricht November 1993, Antwerp, Maklu, 1993.Google Scholar
Faure, M., ‘Eerstingebruikneming in het milieurecht: een rechtseconomische analyse’, in Raes, K. & Willekens, H. (eds.), Economische verklaringen van het recht, The Hague, VUGA, 1994, pp. 147–178.Google Scholar
Faure, M., ‘Economic Models of Compensation for Damage Caused by Nuclear Accidents: Some Lessons for the Revision of the Paris and Vienna Conventions’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 1995a, Vol. 21, pp. 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M., ‘The Limits to Insurability from a Law and Economics Perspective’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1995b, pp. 454–462.CrossRef
Faure, M., ‘Economic Aspects of Environmental Liability: An Introduction’, European Review of Private Law, 1996, Vol. 4(2), pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
Faure, M., ‘Harmonization of Environmental Law and Market Integration: Harmonizing for the Wrong Reasons?’, European Environmental Law Review, 1998a, Vol. 7(6), pp. 169–175.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G., ‘Is aansprakelijkheid ‘met terugwerkende kracht’ efficiënt en verzekerbaar?’, Aansprakelijkheid en Verzekering, 1998b, pp. 1–11.
Faure, M., ‘The Harmonisation, Codification and Integration of Environmental Law: A Search for Definitions’, European Environmental Law Review, 2000, Vol. 9, pp. 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M., ‘Regulatory Competition vs Harmonisation in EU Environmental Law’, in Esty, D. C. & Geradin, D. (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 263–286.Google Scholar
Faure, M., ‘Environmental Damage Insurance in the Netherlands’, Environmental Liability, 2002, pp. 31–41.
Faure, M., ‘Gewinnabschöpfung und Verfall auf ökonomischen Prüfstand’, in Arnold, J. et al. (eds.), Menschengerechtes Strafrecht: Festschrift für Albin Eser zum 70. Geburtstag, Munich, Beck, 2005, pp. 1311–1330.Google Scholar
Faure, M., ‘Economic Criteria for Compulsory Insurance’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 2006, Vol. 31, pp. 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. G., ‘Optimal Specificity in Environmental Standard-Setting’, in Dias Soares, C., Milne, J. E., Ashiabor, H., Kreiser, L., & Deketelaere, K. (eds.), Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation: International and Comparative Perspectives, Vol. III, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 730–745.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G., ‘Does Environmental Law Matter?’, in Faure, M. G. & Smits, J. (eds.), Does Law Matter? On Law and Economic Growth, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2011, pp. 385–416.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G., ‘In the Aftermath of the Disaster: Liability and Compensation Mechanisms as Tools to Reduce Disaster Risks’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 2016a, Vol. 52(1), pp. 95–178.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G., ‘Liability and Compensation for Damage Resulting from CO2 Storage Sites’, William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 2016b, Vol. 40(2), pp. 387–476.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Betlem, G., ‘Applying National Liability Law to Transboundary Pollution. Some Lessons from Europe and the United States’, in Faure, M. & Song, Y. (eds.), China and International Environmental Liability. Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2008, pp. 129–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & De Roos, Th., De berekening van het wederrechtelijk verkregen voordeel uit milieudelicten, The Hague, SDU Uitgevers, 1998.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Fenn, P., ‘Retroactive Liability and the Insurability of Long-Tail Risks’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1999, Vol. 19(4), pp. 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Fiore, K., ‘An Economic Analysis of the Nuclear Liability Subsidy’, Pace Environmental Law Review, 2009, Vol. 26(2), pp. 419–447.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Grimeaud, D., ‘Financial Assurance Issues of Environmental Liability’, in Faure, M. (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability: Future Developments in the European Union, Vienna, Springer, 2003, pp. 7–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Hartlief, T., ‘Gevolgen van de uitbreidende werkgeversaansprakelijkheid: beleidsconsequenties voor verzekeraars?’, in Faure, M. G. & Hartlief, T. (eds.), Verzekering en de Groeiende Aansprakelijkheidslast, een juridisch, gezondheidskundig en economisch onderzoek naar ontwikkelingen met betrekking tot de Aansprakelijkheidslast en de consequenties voor verzekeraars naar aanleiding van de werkgeversaansprakelijkheid voor bedrijfsongevallen en beroepsziekten, Deventer, Kluwer, 1995, pp. 283–337.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Hartlief, T., ‘Towards an Expanding Enterprise Liability in Europe? How to Analyze the Scope of Liability of Industrial Operators and Their Insurers’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1996a, Vol. 3, pp. 235–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Hartlief, T., ‘Een Asbestfonds als alternatief voor de aansprakelijkheid van de werkgever?’, Tijdschrift voor Sociaal Recht, 1996c, pp. 37–43.
Faure, M. & Hartlief, T., ‘Remedies for Expanding Liability’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1998, Vol. 18, pp. 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Hartlief, T., Insurance and Expanding Systemic Risks, Paris, OECD, 2003.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Heine, G., ‘The Insurance of Fines: The Case of Oil Pollution’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1991, Vol. 39, pp. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Heine, G., Criminal Enforcement of Environmental Law in the European Union, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2005.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Johnston, J. S., ‘The Law and Economics of Environmental Federalism: Europe and the United States Compared’, Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 2009, Vol. 27(3), pp. 205–274.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Lefevere, J., ‘Protecting Drinking Water Quality against Contamination by Pesticides: An Alternative Regulatory Framework’, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 1995, Vol. 4(4), pp. 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Lefevere, J. G. J., ‘The Draft Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: An Economic Perspective’, European Environmental Law Review, 1996, Vol. 5, pp. 112–122.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Liu, J., ‘The Tsunami of March 2011 and the Subsequent Nuclear Incident at Fukushima: Who Compensates the Victims?’, William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 2012, Vol. 37, pp. 129–218.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Luth, H. A., ‘Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms. Cautions and Considerations’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 2011, Vol. 34, pp. 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Oudijk, J.C., ‘Die strafgerichtliche Überprüfung von Verwaltungsakten im Umweltrecht, ein rechtvergleichender Überblick der Systeme in Deutschland, den Niederlanden und Belgien’, Juristenzeitung, 1994, Vol. 49, pp. 86–91.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Partain, R. A., Carbon Capture and Storage: Efficient Legal Policies for Risk Governance and Compensation, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Philipsen, N. (eds.), Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, The Hague, Eleven International Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Porrini, D., ‘Göran Skogh on Risk Sharing and Environmental Policy’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 2017, Vol. 42(2), pp. 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Ruegg, M., ‘Environmental Standards Setting through General Principles of Environmental Law’, in Faure, M., Vervaele, J., & Weale, A. (eds.), Environmental Standards in the European Union in an Interdisciplinary Framework, Antwerp, Maklu, 1995, pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Skogh, G., ‘Compensation for Damages Caused by Nuclear Accidents: a Convention as Insurance’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1992, pp. 499–513.CrossRef
Faure, M. & Skogh, G., The Economic Analysis of Environmental Policy and Law: An Introduction, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2003.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Svatikova, K., ‘Enforcement of Environmental Law in the Flemish Region’, European Energy & Environmental Law Review, 2010, Vol. 19(2), pp. 60–79.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Ubachs, S., ‘Environmental Taxation in the Netherlands: A Dutch Treat?’, in Kreiser, L. A. (ed.), Critical Issues in International Environmental Taxation: Insights and Analyses for Achieving Environmental Policy Goals through Tax Policy, Chicago, CCH, 2002, pp. 301–329.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Ubachs, S., ‘Comparative Benefits and Optimal Use of Environmental Taxes’, in Milne, J., Deketelaere, K., Kreiser, L., & Ashiabor, H. (eds.), Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation, Vol. I: International and Comparative Perspectives, Richmond, Richmond Law and Tax, 2003, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Ubachs, S., ‘Harmful Tax Measures and Greying of Taxation in the Netherlands: What Went Wrong?’, in Ashiabor, H., Deketelaere, K., Kreiser, L., & Milne, J. (eds.), Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation: International and Comparative Perspectives, Vol. II, Richmond, Richmond Law and Tax, 2005, pp. 521–532.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Van den Bergh, R., ‘Negligence, Strict Liability and Regulation of Safety under Belgian Law: An Introductory Economic Analysis’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1987, pp. 95–114.CrossRef
Faure, M. & Van den Bergh, R., ‘Compulsory Insurance for Professional Liability’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1989a, pp. 308–330.CrossRef
Faure, M. & Van den Bergh, R., Objectieve aansprakelijkheid, verplichte verzekering en veiligheidsregulering, Antwerp, Maklu, 1989b.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Van den Bergh, R., ‘Liability for Nuclear Accidents in Belgium from an Interest Group Perspective’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1990, Vol. 10, pp. 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. & Van den Bergh, R., ‘Restrictions of Competition on Insurance Markets and the Applicability of EC Antitrust Law’, Kyklos, 1995, Vol. 48, pp. 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Visser, M., ‘Law and Economics of Environmental Crime’, in Sjögren, H. & Skogh, G. (eds.), New Perspectives on Economic Crime, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2004, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Wang, H., ‘Economic Analysis of Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage’, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 2006, Vol. 37, pp. 179–217.Google Scholar
Faure, M. & Wang, H., ‘Compensating Victims of a European Deepwater Horizon Accident: OPOL Revisited’, Marine Policy, 2015, Vol. 62, pp. 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. G. & Weishaar, S. E., ‘The Role of Environmental Taxation: Economics and the Law’, in Milne, J. E. & Andersen, M. S. (eds.), Handbook of Research of Environmental Taxation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2012, pp. 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M., Goodwin, M., & Weber, F., ‘Bucking the Kuznets Curve: Designing Effective Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2010, Vol. 51, pp. 95–156.Google Scholar
Faure, M., Koopmans, I., & Oudijk, J., ‘Imposing Criminal Liability on Government Officials under Environmental Law: A Legal and Economic Analysis’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal, 1996, Vol. 18, pp. 529–569.Google Scholar
Feinberg, K., Who Gets What? Fair Compensation after Tragedy and Financial Upheaval, New York, NY, Public Affairs, 2012.Google Scholar
Fenn, P. & Veljanovski, C., ‘A Positive Economic Theory of Regulatory Enforcement’, Economic Journal, 1988, Vol. 98, pp. 1055–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, B. C., Environmental Economics: An Introduction, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.Google Scholar
Firestone, J., ‘Enforcement of Pollution Laws and Regulations: An Analysis of Forum Choice’, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2003, Vol. 27(1), pp. 105–176.Google Scholar
Fischel, W. A., ‘Externalities and Zoning’, Public Choice, 1980, Vol. 35, pp. 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischel, W. A., The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls, Baltimore, MD, The John Hopkins University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Fischman, R. L. & Barbarsh-Riley, L., ‘Empirical Environmental Scholarship’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 2018, Vol. 44, pp. 767–807.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H., Microeconomics and Behavior, 8th ed., Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010.Google Scholar
Frankel, M., The Alkali Inspectorate: The Control of Air Pollution. Social Audit, A Special Report, London, Headly Brothers, 1974.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. M., ‘Economics, Incentives, and Environmental Regulation’, in Vig, N. J. & Kraft, M. E. (eds.), Environmental Policy in the 1990s: Reform or Reaction?, 3rd ed., Washington, DC, CQ Press, 1997, pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. & Kolstad, Ch. D. (eds.), Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from 20 Years of Experience, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Freestone, D. & Frenkil, D., ‘Emissions Trading in the US: A New Regime Approaching?’, in Roggenkamp, M. & Hammer, U. (eds.), European Energy Law Report VII, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., Umweltökonomie, 3rd ed., Göttingen, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1992.Google Scholar
Frey, B., ‘FOCJ: Competitive Governments for Europe’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1996, Vol. 16, pp. 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S., Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Frey, B., ‘Morality and Rationality in Environmental Policy’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 1999, Vol. 22, pp. 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. & Eichenberger, R., ‘To Harmonise or to Compete? That’s Not the Question’, Journal of Public Economics, 1996, Vol. 60, pp. 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, L., Micro Economic Policy Analysis, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1984.Google Scholar
Friedmann, L., ‘In Defence of Corporate Criminal Liability’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2000, Vol. 23, pp. 833–858.Google Scholar
Friesen, L., ‘Targeting Enforcement to Improve Compliance with Environmental Regulations’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, Vol. 46, pp. 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullerton, D., ‘Six Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy’, NBER Working Paper No. 16703, National Bureau of Economic Research (January 2011), pp. 1–13.
Fullerton, D., Leicester, A., & Smith, S., ‘Environmental Taxes’, in Institute for Fiscal Studies (ed.), Dimensions of Tax Design, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 423–535.Google Scholar
Galle, B., ‘Carrots, Sticks, and Salience’, Tax Law Review, 2013, Vol. 67, pp. 108–109.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. & Klerman, D., ‘Corruption and the Optimal Use of Non-monetary Sanctions’, International Review of Law and Economics, 2004, Vol. 24, pp. 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garoupa, N. & Gomez-Pomar, F., ‘Punish Once or Punish Twice: A Theory of the Use of Criminal Sanctions in Addition to Regulatory Penalties’, American Law and Economics Review, 2004, Vol. 6, pp. 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geers, A. J. C. M., Recht en humanisering van de arbeid, Deventer, Kluwer, 1988.Google Scholar
Geers, A. J. C. M. & Gevers, J. K. M., ‘Schadeloosstelling van slachtoffers van bedrijfsongevallen en beroepsziekten’, Nederlands Juristenblad, 1977, pp. 951–959.
Gerard, D. & Wilson, E., ‘Environmental Bonds and the Challenge of Long-Term Carbon Sequestration’, Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, Vol. 90(2), pp. 1097–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbard, A., ‘Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result’, Econometrica, 1973, Vol. 41(4), pp. 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilead, I., ‘Tort Law and Internalization: The Gap between Private Loss and Social Cost’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1997, Vol. 17(4), pp. 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilhuis, P. & Verschuuren, J., Een Milieuschadefonds in Nederland; een Onderzoek naar de Mogelijkheden, Publicatiereeks Milieubeheer, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilles, M., ‘Public-Private Approaches to Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts on the Gulf Coast Claims Facility’, DePaul Law Review, 2012, Vol. 61(2), p. 427.Google Scholar
Gilles, S., ‘Rule-Based Negligence and the Regulation of Activity Levels’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1992, Vol. 22, pp. 319–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasbergen, P. (ed.), Cooperative Environmental Governance: Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, S., ‘Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion and Statistical Evidence’, Yale Law Journal, 1986, Vol. 96, pp. 376–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, B. J. & Bergkamp, L., ‘Introduction’, in Bergkamp, L. & Goldsmith, B. J. (eds.), The EU Environmental Liability Directive: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Gravelle, H. S. E., ‘Accidents, Taxes, Liability Rules and Insurances’, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1987, Vol. 12, pp. 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, D. & Neuberger, M., ‘Blowout: Legal Legacy of the Deepwater Horizon Catastrophe: Settle or Sue? The Use and Structure of Alternative Compensation Programs in the Mass Claims Context’, Roger Williams University Law Review, Winter 2012, Vol. 17, p. 97.Google Scholar
Greenstone, M., ‘The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufacturers’, Journal of Political Economy, 2002, Vol. 110(6), pp. 1175–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimeaud, D., ‘The Integration of Environmental Concerns into EC Policies: A Genuine Policy Development?’, European Environmental Law Review, 2000, Vol. 9(7), pp. 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grober, U., Sustainability: A Cultural History, Devon, UK, Green Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Groosman, B., ‘Pollution Tax’, in Bouckaert, B. & De Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, II: Civil Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2000, pp. 538–568.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B., ‘Environmental Impacts of a North-American Free Trade Agreement’, in Garber, P. M. (ed.), The US, Mexico Free Trade Agreement, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1993, pp. 13–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B., ‘Economic Growth and the Environment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, Vol. 110, pp. 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P. Z., Clearley, R. W., & Cole, D. H., ‘Uncertainty, Insurance and the Learned Hand Formula’, Law, Probability and Risk, 2006, Vol. 5(1), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, M. & Grabosky, P., Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy, Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Guiso, L. & Paiella, M., ‘Risk Aversion, Wealth, and Background Risk’, Journal of European Economic Association, 2008, Vol. 6(6), pp. 1109–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S. van Houtven, G., & Cropper, M., ‘Do Benefits and Costs Matter in Environmental Regulation? An Analysis of EPA Decisions under Superfund’, in Revesz, R. L. & Stewart, R. B. (eds.), Analyzing Superfund Economics, Science, and Law, Washington, DC, Resources for the Future, 1995, pp. 83–113.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., van Houtven, G., & Cropper, M., ‘Paying for Permanence: An Economic Analysis of EPA’s Cleanup Decisions at Superfund Sites’, Rand Journal of Economics, 1996, Vol. 27(3), pp. 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haazen, O. A. & Spier, J., ‘Amerikaanse toestanden en de nieuwe aansprakelijkheidsverzekering voor bedrijven en beroepen’, Nederlands Juristenblad, 1996, Vol. 71, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. W., ‘A New Approach to the Design of Regulation in the Presence of Multiple Objectives’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989a, Vol. 17, pp. 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, R. W., A Primer on Environmental Policy Design, New York, Harwood Academic, 1989b.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. W., ‘Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor’s Orders’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989c, Vol. 3(2), pp. 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, R. W., ‘Regulatory Constraints on Environmental Markets’, Journal of Public Economics, 1990a, Vol. 42, pp. 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, R. W., ‘The Political Economy of Environmental Regulation: Towards a Unifying Framework’, Public Choice, 1990b, Vol. 65, pp. 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, R. W. & Hester, G. L., ‘Where Did All the Markets Go? An Analysis of EPA’s Emissions Trading Programme’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 1989, Vol. 6, pp. 109–153.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. W. & Noll, R., ‘Barriers to Implementing Tradeable Air Pollution Permits: Problems of Regulatory Interaction’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 1983, Vol. 1, pp. 63–91.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. & Kraakman, R. H., ‘Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts’, Yale Law Journal, 1991, Vol. 100, pp. 1978–1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, I. & Skogh, G., ‘Moral Hazard and Safety Regulation’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1987, Vol. 12, pp. 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G., ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 1968, Vol. 162(3859), pp. 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Harford, J. D. & Harrington, W., ‘A Reconsideration of Enforcement Leverage When Penalties Are Restricted’, Journal of Public Economics, 1991, Vol. 45, pp. 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haritz, M., An Inconvenient Deliberation: The Precautionary Principles Contribution to the Uncertainties Surrounding Climate Change Liability, Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2011.Google Scholar
Harrington, W., ‘Enforcement Leverage When Penalties Are Restricted’, Journal of Public Economics, 1988, Vol. 37, pp. 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, W. & Heyes, A., ‘The Theory of Penalties: “Leverage” and “Dealing”’, in Heyes, A. (ed.), The Law and Economics of the Environment, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 185–197.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. & Rubinfeld, D. L., ‘Hedonic House Prices and the Demand for Clean Air’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1978, Vol. 5, pp. 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. D., & Sterner, Th. (eds.), Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe, Washington, DC, Resources for the Future, 2004.Google Scholar
Hartlief, T. & Spier, J., ‘Verzekering en aansprakelijkheid met “terugwerkende kracht”’, Aansprakelijkheid en Verzekering, 1994, pp. 27–33.
Hartlief, T. & Tjittes, R. P. J. L., Invloed van verzekering op de civiele aansprakelijkheid: Preadvies voor de Vereniging voor Burgerlijk Recht, Lelystad, Vermande, 1990a.Google Scholar
Hartlief, T. & Tjittes, R. P. J. L., ‘De aansprakelijkheid voor bedrijfsongevallen en – ziekten – recente ontwikkelingen met betrekking tot tewerkstelling en bewijslast’, Sociaal Recht, 1990b, pp. 282–288.
Hartlief, T. & Tjittes, R. P. J. L., Verzekering en Aansprakelijkheid, Deventer, Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar
Hausman, J. A., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havercroft, I. & Macrory, R., Legal Liability and Carbon Capture and Storage: A Comparative Perspective, Melbourne, Global CCS Institute, 2014.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K., Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A., ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 1945, Vol. 35(4), pp. 519–530.Google Scholar
Hazelwood, S. J. & Semark, D., P&I Clubs: Law and Practice, London, Lloyd’s List, 2010.Google Scholar
Heimert, A. J., ‘How the Elephant Lost His Tusks’, Yale Law Journal, 1995, Vol. 104(6), pp. 1473–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, G., ‘Die Verwältungsakzessorietät im deutschen Umweltstrafrecht unter Berücksichtigung des österreichischen Rechts. Aktuelle Probleme und Reformüberlegungen’, Österreichische Juristenzeitung, 1991, pp. 370–378.
Heine, G. & Meinberg, V., Empfehlen sich Änderungen im strafrechtlichen Umweltschutz, insbesondere in Verbindung mit dem Verwaltungsrecht? Gutachten für den 57. Deutschen Juristentag, Munich, Beck, 1988.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, R., ‘Maritime Oil Pollution: An Empirical Analysis’, in Faure, M. & Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage, Vienna, Springer, 2007, pp. 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heringa, A. W., ‘Private Life and the Protection of the Environment’, European Court of Human Rights, 9 December 1994, Lopez Ostra v. Spain’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, A. G., ‘Eight Things about Enforcement That Seem Obvious But May Not Be’, in Swanson, T. (ed.), An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Environmental Policy: Issues in Institutional Design, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 519–537.Google Scholar
Heyes, A. G. & Liston-Heyes, C., ‘Subsidy to Nuclear Power through Price-Anderson Liability Limit: Comment’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 1998, Vol. 16(1), pp. 122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, A. & Rickman, N., ‘Regulatory Dealing – Revisiting the Harrington Paradox’, Journal of Public Economics, 1999, Vol. 72, pp. 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. O., Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J., ‘The Expanding Domain of Economics’, American Economic Review, 1985, Vol. 75, pp. 53–68.Google Scholar
Hoch, I. & Drake, J., ‘Wages, Climate and the Quality of Life’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1974, Vol. 1, pp. 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodas, D. & De Armey, P., ‘North-American Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Systems’, in Farber, D. A. & Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2016, pp. 388–399.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. G., ‘Creating a Public-Private Partnership for Florida’s Conservation Land Management’, Backgrounder, 2009, Vol. 59, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Holley, C. & Sinclair, D., ‘Enforcement Strategies: Inspection, Targetting and Escalation’, in Paddock, L. C., Markell, D. L., & Bryner, N. S. (eds.), Compliance and Enforcement of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2017, pp. 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H., ‘Stability in Competition’, Economic Journal, 1929, Vol. 39(153), pp. 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, R. B. & Norgaard, R. B., ‘Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development’, American Economic Association, 1992, Vol. 82(2), pp. 473–477.Google Scholar
Hsu, S.-L., ‘Fairness versus Efficiency in Environmental Law’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 31, pp. 303–401.Google Scholar
Hsu, S.-L., ‘Some Quasi-Behavioral Arguments for Environmental Taxation’, Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation, 2008, Vol. V, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Hsu, S.-L., ‘The Accidental Postmodernists: A New Era of Skepticism in Environmental Policy’, Vermont Law Review, 2014, Vol. 39, pp. 27–88.Google Scholar
Huber, B. R., ‘Temporal Spillovers’, in Mathis, K. & Huber, B., Environmental Law and Economics, Cham, Springer, 2017, pp. 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, P., ‘The Old-New Division in Risk Regulation’, Virginia Law Review, 1983, Vol. 63, pp. 1025–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D., Environmental Law, 2nd ed., Oxford, Butterworths, 1992.Google Scholar
Huisman, W., Tussen winst en moral, achtergronden van regelnaleving en regelovertreding door ondernemingen, The Hague, Boom, 2001.Google Scholar
Huisman, W. & Van de Bunt, H. G., ‘Sancties, organisatiecriminaliteit en milieudelicten’, Ars Aequi, 1997, pp. 695–697.
Hulst, E., Grondslagen van Milieuaansprakelijkheid, diss., Arnhem, Gouda Quint, 1993.Google Scholar
Hulst, E., ‘De werkelijkheid rondom een algemeen milieuschadefonds, een commentaar’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 1995, pp. 167–173.
Huther, J. & Anwar, S., ‘Anti-Corruption Policies and Programs: A Framework for Evaluation’, World Bank Working Paper 2501, 2001.
Hylton, K. N., ‘When Should We Prefer Tort Law to Environmental Regulation?’, Washburn Law Journal, 2002, Vol. 41, pp. 515–543.Google Scholar
Inman, R. & Rubinfeld, D., ‘The EMU and Fiscal Policy in the New European Community: An Issue for Economic Federalism’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1994, Vol. 14(2), pp. 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, R., ‘Self-Enforcement of Environmental Law’, in Heyes, A. (ed.), The Law and Economics of the Environment, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 150–184.Google Scholar
Innes, R. & Sam, A. G., ‘Voluntary Pollution Reductions and the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Empirical Study of the 33/50 Programme’, Journal of Law and Economics, 2008, Vol. 51(2), pp. 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Interuniversitaire Commissie tot Herziening van het Milieurecht in het Vlaamse Gewest, Voorontwerp Decreet Milieubeleid, Brugge, die Keure, 1995.
Jacob, H., ‘Deterrent Effects of Formal and Informal Sanctions’, Law & Policy, 1980, Vol. 2(1), pp. 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A., Peterson, D., Portney, P., & Stavins, R., ‘Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell us?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 1995, Vol. 33, pp. 132–163.Google Scholar
Jaffer, S. & Kay, J., ‘The Regulation of Shop Opening Hours in the United Kingdom’, in Graf von den Schulenburg, J. M. & Skogh, G. (eds.), Law and Economics and the Economics of Legal Regulation, Dordrecht, Nijhoff, 1986, pp. 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jans, J. H., European Environmental Law, The Hague/London/Boston, Kluwer Law International, 1995.Google Scholar
Jans, J. H., European Environmental Law, 2nd ed., Groningen, European Law Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
Jans, J. H. & Vedder, H. H. B., European Environmental Law: After Lisbon, 4th ed., Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, T., List, J. A., & Folmer, H., ‘Environmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions: Evidence from a Meta-analysis’, Journal of Regional Science, 2002, Vol. 42, pp. 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. S., ‘The Law and Economics of Environmental Contracts’, in Orts, E. W. & Deketelaere, K. (eds.), Environmental Contracts: Comparative Approaches to Regulatory Innovation in the United States and Europe, The Hague, Kluwer, 2001, pp. 271–304.Google Scholar
Jones, B., ‘The Identification and Remediation of Contaminated Sites: The United Kingdom’s Environment Act 1995’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 1995, pp. 159–166.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. R., ‘New Instruments of Environmental Governance: Patterns and Pathways of Change’, Special Issue Environmental Politics, 2003, Vol. 12(1), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josen, J., ‘Catastrophe Bonds – Fear of the Unknown?’, Derivative Times, 5 June, 2015.
Jost, P. J., ‘Limited Liability and the Requirement to Purchase Insurance’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1996, Vol. 16(2), pp. 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M., ‘Social Meaning and the Economic Analysis of Crime’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1998, Vol. 27, pp. 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A., ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica, 1979, Vol. 47, pp. 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, P., ‘Using Tort Law to Enforce Environmental Regulations?’, Washburn Law Journal, 2002, Vol. 41, pp. 427–467.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L., ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Transition’, Harvard Law Review, 1986, Vol. 99, pp. 509–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapp, W., ‘Environmental Disruption and Social Costs: A Challenge to Economics’, Kyklos, 1970, Vol. 23(4), pp. 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J. M. Lott, J. R., & Ranike, G., ‘Environmental Violations, Legal Penalties, and Repudiation Costs’, University of Chicago John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 71 (2nd series), 1998.CrossRef
Kathuria, V., ‘Controlling Water Pollution in Developing and Transition Countries – Lessons from Three Successful Cases’, Journal of Environmental Management, 2006, Vol. 78, pp. 405–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzman, M. T., ‘Pollution Liabilitiy Insurance and Catastrophic Environmental Risks’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1988, Vol. 55(1), pp. 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, D., ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiable Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation’, Law & Social Inquiry, 1982, Vol. 7(2), pp. 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, D. & Rubin, P., ‘Shadow Interest Groups and Safety Regulation’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1988, Vol. 8, pp. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, N. O., ‘Cost Savings from Allowance Trading in the 1990 Clean Air Act: Estimates from a Choice-Based Model’, in Freeman, J. & Kolstad, Ch. D. (eds.), Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from 20 Years of Experience, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 194–229.Google Scholar
Ketchum, L., ‘Epidemiologic Tables Law Groundwork for Future Radiogenic Cancer Claims’, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 1985, Vol. 26, pp. 967–972.Google Scholar
Kilchling, M., ‘Comparative Perspectives on Forfeiture Legislation in Europe and the United States’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1997, Vol. 5, pp. 342–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilchling, M. (ed.), Die Praxis der Gewinnabschöpfung in Europa, Freiburg im Breisgau, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, 2002.Google Scholar
Kirchgässner, G. & Pommerehne, W., ‘Tax Harmonisation and Tax Competition in the European Community: Lessons from Switzerland’ (paper presented at the Cost Meeting in Luzern November 1993).
Kitzmueller, M. & Shimshack, J., ‘Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Economic Literature, 2012, Vol. 50(1), pp. 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloepfer, M., ‘On the Codification of German Environmental Law’, in Bocken, H. & Ryckbost, D. (eds.), Codification of Environmental Law, Proceedings of the International Conference, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Klosse, S., ‘Bedrijfsongevallen en beroepsziekten: individuele of collectieve verantwoordelijkheid’, Nederlands Juristenblad, 1993, pp. 1608–1613.
Knottenbelt, J., Produktaansprakelijkheid, diss., Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 1990.Google Scholar
Koch, B. A. & Koziol, H., ‘Comparative Conclusions’, in Koch, B. A. & Koziol, H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Strict Liability, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002, pp. 395–435.Google Scholar
Kolstad, C. D., ‘Uniformity versus Differentiation in Regulating Externalities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1987, Vol. 1, pp. 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolstad, Ch. D., Ulen, Th. S., & Johnson, G. V., ‘Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements’, American Economic Review, 1990, Vol. 80, pp. 888–901.Google Scholar
Konar, S. & Cohen, M. A., ‘Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997, Vol. 32, pp. 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körber, A., ‘Standards and Taxes in Environmental Law from a Public Choice Perspective’, in Bouckaert, B. & De Geest, G. (eds.), Essays in Law and Economics II, Antwerp, Maklu, 1995, pp. 161–191.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A., ‘An Economic Analysis of the Choice between Enterprise and Personal Liability for Accidents’, California Law Review, 1982, Vol. 70, pp. 1345–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. & Revesz, R. L., ‘Sharing Damages among Multiple Tortfeasors’, Yale Law Journal, 1989, Vol. 98(5), pp. 831–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. & Revesz, R. L., ‘Apportioning Damages among Potentially Insolvent Actors’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1990, Vol. 19(2), pp. 617–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosonen, K. & Nicodème, G., ‘The Role of Fiscal Instruments in Environmental Policy’, CESifo Working Paper No 2719, July 2009.
Kottenhagen-Edzes, P. A., Onrechtmatige daad en milieu. Het gebruik van het privaatrecht bij het voorkomen van milieuaantasting en het verhaal van milieuschade, Arnhem, Gouda Quint, 1992.Google Scholar
Kozeltsev, M. & Markandya, A., ‘Pollution Charges in Russia: The Experience of 1990–1995’, in Bluffstone, R. & Larson, B. A. (eds.), Controlling Pollution in Transition Economies: Theories and Methods, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1997, pp. 128–143.Google Scholar
Krämer, L., ‘Community Environmental Law under the Maastricht Treaty on European Union and the Fifth Action Programme’, in Abraham, T., Deketelaere, K., & Stuyck, J. (eds.), Recent Economic and Legal Developments in European Environmental Policy, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1995, pp. 75–106.Google Scholar
Krämer, L., ‘The Principle of Fighting Environmental Harm and Source (Source Principle)’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutilla, J. V., ‘Conservation Reconsidered’, American Economic Review, 1967, Vol. 57, pp. 777–786.Google Scholar
Krutilla, J. V. & Fisher, A., The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Recourses, rev. ed., Washington, DC, Recourses for the future, 1985.Google Scholar
Kuik, O. & Oosterhuis, F., ‘Economic Impacts of the EU ETS: Preliminary Evidence’, in Faure, M. & Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change and European Emissions Trading. Lessons for Theory and Practice, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2008, pp. 208–222.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H. & Freeman, P., ‘Insurability, Environmental Risks and the Law’, in Heyes, A. (ed.), The Law and Economics of the Environment, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 302–318.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H., Hogarth, R., & Meszaros, J., ‘Insurer Ambiguity and Market Failure’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993, Vol. 7, pp. 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S., ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’, American Economic Review, 1955, Vol. 45,(1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Landes, W. M. & Posner, R. A., ‘The Private Enforcement of Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1975, Vol. 4, pp. 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. & Posner, R., ‘An Economic Theory of Intentional Torts’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1981a, Vol. 1, pp. 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. & Posner, R., ‘The Positive Economic Theory of Tort Law’, Georgia Law Review, 1981b, Vol. 15, pp. 851–924.Google Scholar
Landes, W. & Posner, R., ‘Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1983, Vol. 12, pp. 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. & Posner, R., ‘Tort Law as a Regulatory Regime for Catastrophic Personal Injuries’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1984, Vol. 13, pp. 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. & Posner, R., The Economic Structure of Tort Law, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lando, O., ‘Die Regeln des Europäischen Vertragsrecht’, in Müller-Graff, P. C. (ed.), Gemeinsames Privatrecht in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1993, pp. 473–474.Google Scholar
Laskowska, A. & Scrimgeour, F., ‘Environmental Taxation: The European Experience’, University of Waikato, Working Paper, 2002, available at: http://wms.soros.mngt.vaikato.ac.nz/NR/exeres/E33CCD10-4841-47AE-8A1A-C66E1B01E9FD.htm.
Lazarus, R. J., The Making of Environmental Law, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Lee, D. R., ‘Rent-Seeking and Its Implications for Pollution Taxation’, Southern Economic Journal, 1985, Vol. 51, pp. 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M., ‘The Intersection between Environmental Law and Tort Law’, in Paddock, L. C., Glicksman, R. L., & Bryne, N. S. (eds.), Decision-Making in Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2016, pp. 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1997, Vol. 4, pp. 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘Antivonbar’, Journal of Comparative Law, 2008, Vol. 1(1), pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
Levinson, A., ‘The Missing Pollution Haven Effect’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, Vol. 15(4), pp. 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, A., ‘Environmental Regulatory Competition: A Status Report and Some New Evidence’, National Tax Journal, 2003, Vol. 56(1), pp. 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libecap, G. D. & Wiggins, S. N., ‘Contractual Responses to the Common Pool: Prorationing of Crude Oil Production’, American Economic Review, 1994, Vol. 74(1), pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
Lierman, S. & Veuchelen, L., ‘The Optimisation Approach of ALARA in Nuclear Practice: An Early Application of the Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty versus Legal Uncertainty’, Water Science & Technology, 2005, Vol. 52(6), pp. 81–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
List, J. A., McHone, W. W., & Millimet, D. L., ‘Effects of Air Quality Regulation on the Destination Choice of Relocating Plants’, Oxford Economic Papers, 2003, pp. 657–678.CrossRef
Litz, F. T., ‘Harnessing Market Forces in Natural Resources Management: Lessons from the Surf Clam Fishery’, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 1994, Vol. 21(2), pp. 335–361.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Compensation for Ecological Damage: Comparative and Economic Observations, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2013.Google Scholar
Livermore, M. A., ‘The Perils of Experimentation’, Yale Law Journal, 2017, Vol. 126(3), pp. 636–708.Google Scholar
Lofton, J. A., ‘Environmental Enforcement: The Impact of Cultural Values and Attitudes on Social Regulation’, Environmental Liability, 2001, Vol. 4, pp. 167–181.Google Scholar
Lokur, M. B.‚ ‘Environmental Law – Its Development and Jurisprudence’, Green Law Lecture 2006, WWF-India, available at: www.wwfindia.org/news_facts/?1320.
Lomas, O., ‘Current Survey: Environment’, Utilities Law Review, Summer 1990, p. 62.
Lu, M., Choose or Loose, Another Road to China’s Sustainable Development: A Law and Economics Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Theories and Practices, diss., Maastricht, Maastricht University, 2017.Google ScholarPubMed
Lu, M. & Faure, M. G., ‘The Regulation of Corporate Environmental Responsibility’, in Philipsen, N., Weishaar, S. E., & Xu, G. (eds.), Market Integration: The EU Experience and Implications for Regulatory Reform in China, Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, 2016, pp. 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueck, D., ‘The Economic Nature of Wildlife Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1989, Vol. 18(2), pp. 291–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueck, D., ‘Property Rights and the Economic Logic of Wildlife Institutions’, Natural Resources Journal, 1995, Vol. 35, pp. 625–670.Google Scholar
Lueck, D., ‘Property Institutions and the Limits of Coase’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 2017, Vol. 13(4), pp. 793–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueck, D. & Micelli, T. J., ‘Property Law’, in Polinsky, A. M. & Shavell, S. (eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2007, pp. 183–257.Google Scholar
Lutterer, W. & Hoch, H. K., Rechtliche Steuerung im Umweltbereich. Funktionsstrukturen des Umweltstrafrechts und des Umweltordnungswidrigkeitenrechts: Empirische Untersuchungen zur Implementation strafbewehrter Vorschriften im Bereich des Umweltschutzes, Freiburg im Breisgau, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, 1997.Google Scholar
MacDonell, C., ‘The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes’, Stanford Law Review, 2012, Vol. 64(3), p. 765.Google Scholar
Mackaay, E., Economics of Information and the Law, The Hague, Kluwer, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G., ‘Unity in Diversity: European Integration and the Enlargement Process’, European Law Review, 2008, Vol. 33, pp. 457–481.Google Scholar
Makdisi, J., ‘Proportional Liability: A Comprehensive Rule to Apportion Tort Damages Based on Probability’, North Carolina Law Review, 1989, Vol. 67, pp. 1063–1101.Google Scholar
Maler, K. G., ‘A Note on the Use of Property Values in Estimating Marginal Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1977, Vol. 4, pp. 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, M. & McCormick, R., ‘A Positive Theory of Environmental Quality Regulation’, Journal of Law and Economics, 1982, Vol. 25(1), pp. 99–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markesinis, B. S., The German Law of Torts: A Comparative Introduction, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
Marshall, J., ‘Moral Hazard’, American Economic Review, 1976, Vol. 66, pp. 880–890.Google Scholar
Martinez Gandara, A., The Law and Economics of Eco-labels, diss., Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2013.Google Scholar
Mashale, C., Moyo, T., & Mtapuri, O., ‘An Evaluation of the Public-Private Partnership in the Lekgalameetse Nature Reserve in South Africa’, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2014, Vol. 5(20), pp. 855–862.Google Scholar
Massai, L., ‘The Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System’, in Roggenkamp, M. & Hammer, U. (eds.), European Energy Law Report VII, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Mattei, U., Comparative Law and Economics, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
May, P. J. & Winter, S., ‘Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance: Examining Danish Agro-Environmental Policy’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1999, Vol. 18, pp. 625–651.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, D. & Smith, C. Jr., ‘On the Corporate Demand for Insurance’, Journal of Business, 1982, Vol. 55(2), pp. 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mburu, J. & Birner, R., ‘Emergence, Adoption and Implementation of Collaborative Wildlife Management or Wildlife Partnerships in Kenya: A Look at Conditions for Success’, Society and Natural Resources, 2007, Vol. 20(5), pp. 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, L. K., Van Rooij, B., & Kagan, R. A., ‘Re-orienting Regulation: Pollution Enforcement in Industrialising Countries’, Law & Policy, 2010, Vol. 32, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
McCormick, R. & Tollison, R., Politicians, Legislation and the Economy: An Inquiry into the Interest Group Theory of Governments, Boston, MA, Martinus Nijhoff, 1982.Google Scholar
McPherson, M. A. & Nieswiadomy, M. L., ‘African Elephants: The Effect of Property Rights and Political Stability’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 2000, Vol. 18(1), pp. 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, S. G., ‘Juris Prudence: Calabresi’s Uneasy Relationship with the Coase Theorem’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 2014, Vol. 77(65), pp. 65–95.Google Scholar
Mehta, M. C., ‘The Accountability Principle: Legal Solutions to Break Corruption’s Impact on India’s Environment’, Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2006, Vol. 21(1), pp. 141–156.Google Scholar
Meinberg, V., ‘Empirische Erkenntnisse zum Vollzug des Umweltstrafrechts’, Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaften, 1988, Vol. 100, pp. 112–157.Google Scholar
Merrill, T., ‘Trespass, Nuisance and the Costs of Determining Property Rights’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1985, Vol. 14(1), pp. 13–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, F. & Moseley, R., Medical Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Orlando, FL, Grune and Stratton, 1985.Google Scholar
Miceli, T., ‘Optimal Prosecution of Defendants Whose Guilt Is Uncertain’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 1990, Vol. 6, pp. 189–201.Google Scholar
Miceli, Th. J., ‘Litigation Costs and the Statute of Limitations for Tort Suits’, International Review of Law and Economics, 2000, Vol. 20(3), pp. 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G. & Justice, C., ‘Organisational Liability for Environmental Crimes’, in Paddock, L. C., Markell, D. L., & Bryner, N. S. (eds.), Compliance and Enforcement of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2017, pp. 200–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millimet, D. L. & List, J. A., ‘The Case of the Missing Pollution Haven Hypothesis’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2004, Vol. 26, pp. 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Housing, ‘Spatial Planning and the Environment, the Netherlands’ Energy Tax: Questions and Answers’, The Hague, Ministry of Housing, 2004.
Mishan, E. J., ‘Pangloss on Pollution’, Swedish Journal of Economics, 1971a, Vol. 73(1), pp. 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishan, E. J., ‘The Post War Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay’, Journal of Economic Literature, 1971b, Vol. 9(1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J., Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Informal Introduction, London, Allen & Unwin, 2nd ed., 1974.Google Scholar
Moloney, M. T. & McCormick, R. E., ‘A Positive Theory of Environmental Quality Regulation’, Journal of Law & Economics, 1982, Vol. 25, pp. 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, A., ‘Environmental Risk: A Comparative Law and Economics Approach to Liability and Insurance’, European Review of Private Law, 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montini, M., ‘The Principle of Integration’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. P., ‘The Purpose of Licensing’, Journal of Law and Economics, 1961, Vol. 4, pp. 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morely, B., ‘Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Environmental Taxes’, University of Bath, Working Paper No. 02/10, 2010, available at: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/18105/1/0210.pdf.
Mullenix, L., ‘Prometheus Unbound: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility as a Means for Resolving Mass Tort Claims – A Fund Too Far’, 2011, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 819.Google Scholar
Mullis, A. & Oliphant, K., Torts, London, Palgrave, 2011.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. B. & Satterthwaite, M. A., ‘Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading’, Journal of Economic Theory, 1983, Vol. 29(2), pp. 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. R., ‘Too Much Market? Conflict between Tradable Pollution Allowances and the “Polluter Pays Principle”’, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2000, Vol. 24, pp. 465–535.Google Scholar
Nash, J. R. & Revesz, R. L., ‘The Design of Marketable Permit Schemes to Control Local and Regional Pollutants’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 2001, Vol. 28, pp. 559–661.Google Scholar
Nash, J. R. & Revesz, R. L., ‘The Design of Marketable Permit Schemes to Control Local and Regional Pollutants’, in Swanson, Th. (ed.), An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Environmental Policy: Issues in Institutional Design, Amsterdam, JAI Press, 2002, pp. 331–377.Google Scholar
Nelson, B., Economic Analysis of Transportation Noise Abatement, Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1978.Google Scholar
Nentjes, A. & Hommes, J., ‘Handhaving van het milieurecht’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid, 1990, pp. 1–7.
Newman, P. (ed.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, London, Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niessen, N., ‘Decentralized Environmental Management’, in Faure, M. & Niessen, N. (eds.), Environmental Law in Development: Lessons from the Indonesian Experience, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2006, pp. 143–181.Google Scholar
Niezen, G. J., Raaijmaker, M. J. G. C., & Tervoort, A. J. S. M. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor milieuschade in de Europese Unie: Ongebonden Recht Bedrijven, Deventer, Kluwer, 2000.Google Scholar
Nshimbi, M. & Vinya, R., ‘Impacts of Public-Private Partnerships on Local Livelihoods and Natural Resource Dynamics: Perceptions from Eastern Zambia’, Resources, 2014, Vol. 3(2), pp. 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, K. & Telle, K., ‘The Role of Warnings in Regulation: Keeping Control with Less Punishment’, Journal of Public Economics, 2004, Vol. 88(12), pp. 2801–2816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W., Fiscal Federalism, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.Google Scholar
Oates, W., ‘Book Review: The Uncertain Search for Environmental Quality’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1976, Vol. 124(3), pp. 864–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W., ‘The Regulation of Externalities: Efficient Behaviour by Sources and Victims’, Public Finance, 1983, Vol. 38(3), pp. 362–375.Google Scholar
Oates, W. E., ‘The Environment and the Economy: Environmental Policy at the Crossroads’, in Quigley, J. & Rubinfeld, D. (eds.), American Domestic Priorities: An Economic Appraisal, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1985, pp. 311–345.Google Scholar
Oates, W. E., ‘Market Incentives for Environmental Protection: A Survey of Some Recent Developments’, in Peston, M. & Quandt, R. (eds.), Prices, Competition and Equilibrium, London, Philip Allen, 1986, pp. 251–267.Google Scholar
Oates, W. E., ‘Economics, Economists, and Environmental Policy’, Eastern Economic Journal, 1990, Vol. 16(4), pp. 289–296.Google Scholar
Oates, W. & McGartland, A. M., ‘Marketable Permits for the Prevention of Environmental Deterioration’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1985, Vol. 12(3), pp. 207–228.Google Scholar
Oates, W. & Schwab, R., ‘Economic Competition among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing?’, Journal of Public Economics, 1988, Vol. 35(3), pp. 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W. E., Portney, P. R., & McGartland, A. M., ‘The Net Benefits of Incentive-Based Regulation: A Case Study of Environmental Standard Setting’, American Economic Review, 1989, Vol. 79, pp. 1233–1244.Google Scholar
OCIMF, ‘The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (‘OPA 90’): Why Has It Been so Successful at Reducing Spills’, 2003.
O’Connor, D., ‘Applying Economic Instruments in Developing Countries: From Theory to Implementation’, Environment and Development Economics, 1998, Vol. 4(1), pp. 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD, The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes, Paris, OECD, 2006.
OECD, Ensuring Environmental Compliance: Trends and Good Practice, Paris, OECD, 2009.
Ogus, A. I., ‘Quantitative Rules and Judicial Decision-Making’, in Burrows, P. & Veljanovski, C. (eds.), The Economic Approach to Law, London, Butterworth, 1981, pp. 210–225.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. I., Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994a.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. I., ‘Standard-Setting for Environmental Protection: Principles and Processes’, in Faure, M., Vervaele, J., & Weale, A. (eds.), Environmental Standard in the European Union in an Interdisciplinary Framework, Antwerp, Maklu, 1994b, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. I., ‘Quality Control for European Regulation’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A., ‘Competition between National Legal Systems: A Contribution to Economic Analysis to Comparative Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1999b, Vol. 48, pp. 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A., ‘Enforcing Regulation: Do We Need the Criminal Law?’, in Sjögren, H. & Skogh, G. (eds.), New Perspectives on Economic Crime, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar, 2004a, pp. 42–56.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. I., Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2004b.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. I., ‘Corruption and Regulatory Structures’, Law & Policy, 2004c, Vol. 26, pp. 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A. I., ‘Regulatory Arrangements and Incentives for Opportunistic Behaviour’, in Eger, Th., Faure, M., & Zhang, N. (eds.), Economic Analysis of Law in China, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2007, pp. 151–158.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. I., ‘Regulation Revisited’, Public Law, 2009, Vol. 2, pp. 332–346.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. & Abbot, C., ‘Pollution and Penalties’, in Swanson, T. (ed.), An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Environmental Policy: Issues in Institutional Design, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2002a, pp. 493–516.Google Scholar
Ogus, A. & Abbot, C., ‘Sanctions for Pollution: Do We Have the Right Regime?’, Journal of Environmental Law, 2002b, Vol. 14, pp. 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A. I. & Carbonara, E., ‘Self-Regulation’, in Parisi, F. (ed.), Production of Legal Rules, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2011, pp. 228–252.Google Scholar
Olken, B. A., ‘Corruption and the Costs of Redistribution: Micro Evidence from Indonesia’, Journal of Public Economics, 2006, Vol. 90, pp. 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, S. M. & Stavins, R. N., ‘Comparing Price and Nonprice Approaches to Urban Water Conservation’, Water Resources Research, 2009, Vol. 45, W04301, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M., The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Olson, M., The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Orts, E. W. & Deketelaere, K. (eds.), Environmental Contracts: Comparative Approaches to Regulatory Innovation in the United States and Europe, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., ‘Self-Governance and Forest Resources’, 1999, available at: www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-20.pdf.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. et al., ‘Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges’, Science, 1999, Vol. 284(5412), pp. 278–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, C. L. & Schäfer, H.-B., ‘Die Vereinheitlichung des Europäischen Vertragsrechts: Ökonomische Notwendigkeit oder akademisches Interesse?’, in Ott, C. L. & Schäfer, H.-B. (eds.), Vereinheitlichung und Diversität des Zivilrechts in transnationalen Wirtschaftsraum, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2003, pp. 203–236.Google Scholar
Otto, H. J., General Prävention und externe Verhaltenskontrolle: Wandel von soziologischen zum ökonomischen Paradigma in der nord-amerikanischen Kriminologie?, Freiburg im Breisgau, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, 1982.Google Scholar
Pagh, P., ‘The New Danish Act on Strict Liability for Environmental Damage’, Environmental Liability, 1995, Vol. 3, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar
Pagh, P., ‘Experiences of and Plans for the Codification of Environmental Law in Denmark’, in Bocken, H. & Ryckbost, D. (eds.), Codification of Environmental Law, Proceedings of the International Conference, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996, pp. 143–153.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. & Riera, A., ‘Tourism and Environmental Taxes: With Special Reference to the “Balearic Ecotax”’, Tourism Management, 2003, Vol. 24, pp. 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paloniitty, T. & Eliantonio, M., ‘Scientific Knowledge in Environmental Judicial Review: Safeguarding Effective Judicial Protection in the EU Member States?’, European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 2018, Vol. 27, pp. 108–114.Google Scholar
Panayotou, T., ‘Economic Instruments for Environmental Management in Developing Countries’, Prepared for the United Nations Environment Programme’s Consultative Expert Group Meeting on the Use and Application of Economic Policy Instruments for Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Nairobi, February 23–24, 1995; Environmental Economics Series Paper No. 16; 1–73.
Pallemaerts, M., ‘De opkomst van het begrip duurzame ontwikkeling, het internationaal juridisch en politiek discours: een Conceptuele revolutie’, Recht en kritiek, 1995, Vol. 21, pp. 60–77.Google Scholar
Parpworth, N., ‘Enforcement in Environmental Regulation: The Defra Review’, Environmental Liability, 2007, Vol. 15(1), pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Partain, R. A., ‘Moerman versus Pierson: The Nexus of Occupancy in Animals Ferae Naturae and Liability in Tort,’ Soongsil Law Review, 2012, Vol. 28, pp. 241–290.Google Scholar
Partain, R., ‘The Legally Pluralistic Tourist’, in Sonnenburg, S. & Wee, D. (eds.), Touring Consumption – Management – Culture – Interpretation, Wiesbaden, Springer VS, 2015, pp. 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashigian, B. P., ‘The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Optimal Plant Size and Factor Shares’, Journal of Law & Economics, 1984, Vol. 27, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, M., ‘The Economics of Moral Hazard: Comment’, American Economic Review, 1968, Vol. 58, pp. 531–545.Google Scholar
Peeters, M., ‘Emissions Trading as a New Dimension to European Environmental Law: The Political Agreement of the European Council on Greenhouse Gas Allowance Trading’, European Environmental Law Review, 2003, Vol. 12, pp. 82–92.Google Scholar
Peeters, M., ‘Enforcement of the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme’, in Deketelaere, K. & Peeters, M. (eds.), EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives, Cheltenham UK, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006a, pp. 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, M., ‘Inspection and Market-Based Regulation Through Emissions Trading: The Striking Reliance on Self-Monitoring, Self-Reporting and Verification’, Utrecht Law Review, 2006b, Vol. 2(1), pp. 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, M., ‘The Joint Governance of Transboundary River Basins: Some Observations on the Role of Law’, in Faure, M. & Song, Y. (eds.), China and International Environmental Liability: Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2008, pp. 192–224.Google Scholar
Peeters, M., ‘Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the EU’, in Farber, D. A. & Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2016, pp. 377–387.Google Scholar
Pelzman, S., ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’, Journal of Law and Economics, 1976, Vol. 19, pp. 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, O., ‘Reflections on an Environmental Struggle: P&O, Dahanu and the Regulation of Multinational Enterprises’, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 2002, Vol. 15(1), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Pernetta, A. P., ‘A Disappearing Drylands Icon? White Rhinoceros Conservation and the Need for Public-Private Partnerships’, Biodiversity, 2014, Vol. 15(2–3), pp. 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, W., ‘Vermögensstrafe und erweiterte Verfall’, Juristenzeitung, 1993, pp. 919–920.
Pigou, A. C., A Study in Public Finance, London, Macmillan, 1951.Google Scholar
Polak, N. V., ‘Algemene beginselen van rechterlijk overgangsrecht’, Themis, 1984, Vol. 46, pp. 231–244.Google Scholar
Polborn, M. K., ‘Mandatory Insurance and the Judgment Proof Problem’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1998, Vol. 18(2), pp. 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A. M., ‘Controlling Externalities and Protecting Entitlements: Property Rights, Liability Rule and the Tax-Subsidy Approaches’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1979, Vol. 8, pp. 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., Introduction to Law and Economics, Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A. M. & Shavell, S., ‘The Optimal Trade-Off between the Probability and the Magnitude of Fines’, American Economic Review, 1979, Vol. 69, pp. 880–891.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A. M. & Shavell, S., ‘A Note on Optimal Fines When Wealth Varies among Individuals’, American Economic Review, 1991, Vol. 81, pp. 618–621.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A. M. & Shavell, S., ‘Should Employees be Subject to Fines and Imprisonment Given the Existence of Corporate Liability?’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1993, Vol. 13, pp. 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommerehne, W. W., ‘Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Comparison of Hedonic Technique and Contingent Valuation’, in Bös, D., Rose, M., & Seidl, Chr. (eds.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Berlin, Springer, 1988, pp. 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., ‘America’s Green Strategy’, Scientific American, 1991, Vol. 264(4), pp. 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. & Van der Linde, C., ‘Towards a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, Vol. 9, pp. 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R., Economic Analysis of Law, Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company, 1973.Google Scholar
Posner, R., ‘Theories of Economic Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics, 1974, Vol. 5(2), pp. 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R., ‘Optimal Sentences for White-Collar Criminals’, American Criminal Law Review, 1980, Vol. 17, pp. 400–418.Google Scholar
Posner, R., ‘An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law’, Columbia Law Review, 1985, Vol. 85, pp. 1193–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R., Economic Analysis of Law, 3rd ed., Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Posner, R., Economic Analysis of Law, 5th ed., New York, Aspen Law & Business, 1998.Google Scholar
Posner, R., Economic Analysis of Law, 6th ed., New York, Aspen Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Posner, R., Economic Analysis of Law, 9th ed., New York, Aspen Publishers, 2014.Google Scholar
Pozzo, B., ‘The Liability Problem in Modern Environmental Statutes’, European Review of Private Law, 1996, Vol. 4(2), pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
Priest, G. L., ‘The Current Insurance Crisis and Modern Tort Law’, Yale Law Journal, 1987, Vol. 96, pp. 1521–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieur, M., ‘Le parlement contre l’environnement’, Revue Juridique de l’Environnement, 1977, Vol. 2(2), pp. 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieur, M., Droit de l’Environnement, 6th ed., Paris, Dalloz, 2011.Google Scholar
Princen, S. B. M., ‘The California Effect in the Transatlantic Relationship’, diss., University of Utrecht, 2002, unpublished.
Raja, A. V. & Rathinam, F. X., ‘Economic Efficiency and Public Interest Litigations (PIL): Lessons from India’, paper presented at the first annual conference of the Asian Law and Economics Association 20 (June 25, 2005a) (Asian Law and Econ. Ass’n Conference, Kyung Hee Univ. [S. Korea]).
Raja, A. V. & Rathinam, F. X., ‘Efficiency and Strategic Behaviour: The Case of Mass Torts’ (unpublished working paper, on file with the University of Hyderabad, Dep’t Econ.), 2005b.
Raja, A. V. & Rathinam, F. X., ‘Regulatory Failure and the Economic Efficiency of Public Interest Litigation 22’ (Dec. 8, 2006) (unpublished manuscript, University of Hyderabad) (on file with the Virginia Journal of International Law Association).
Rajamani, L., ‘Public Interest Environmental Litigation in India: Exploring Issues of Access, Participation, Equity, Effectiveness and Sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Law, 2007, Vol. 19(3), pp. 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranchordás, S., ‘Innovation-Friendly Regulation: The Sunset of Regulation, the Sunrise of Innovation’, Jurimetrics, 2015, Vol. 55(2), pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
Rea, S., ‘The Economics of Insurance Law’, International Review of Law and Economics, 1993, Vol. 13, pp. 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, S., ‘Insurance Law’, in Newman, P. (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, London, Macmillan, 1998, pp. 342–348.Google Scholar
Reese, M., ‘The Proximity Principle’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reny, Ph. J., ‘Arrow’s Theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem: A Unified Approach’, Economics Letters, 2001, Vol. 70(1), pp. 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, R., ‘Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the Race-for-the-Bottom Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation’, New York University Law Review, 1992, Vol. 67, pp. 1210–1254.Google Scholar
Revesz, R., ‘Federalism and Environmental Regulation: Lessons for the European Union and the International Community’, Virginia Law Review, 1997a, Vol. 83, pp. 1331–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, R. L., ‘The Race-to-the-Bottom and Federal Environmental Regulation: A Response to Critics’, Minnesota Law Review, 1997b, Vol. 82, pp. 535–564.Google Scholar
Revesz, R., ‘Environmental Regulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Discounting of Human Lives’, Columbia Law Review, 1999, Vol. 99, pp. 941–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revesz, R., ‘Federalism and Environmental Regulation: An Overview’, in Revesz, R., Sands, Ph., & Stewart, R. (eds.), Environmental Law: The Economy and Sustainable Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 37–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, R. L. & Livermore, M. A., Retaking Rationality: How Cost Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Revesz, R. & Stewart, R. (eds.), Analysing Superfund, Economics, Science and Law, Washington, DC, Resources for the Future, 1995.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. J., Environmental Regulation through Financial Organisations: Comparative Perspectives on the Industrialised Nation, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. & Chanwai, K., ‘The UK’s Climate Change Levy: Is It Working?’, Journal of Environmental Law, 2003, Vol. 15(1), pp. 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G., Ogus, A., & Burrows, P., Policy Pollution: A Study of Regulation and Enforcement, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Rizzo, M. & Arnold, F., ‘Causal Apportionment in the Law of Torts: An Economic Theory’, Columbia Law Review, 1980, Vol. 80, pp. 1399–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, M. & Arnold, F., ‘Causal Apportionment: Reply to the Critics’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1986, Vol. 15, pp. 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G., ‘Probabilistic Causation and Compensation for Tortuous Risk’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1985, Vol. 14, pp. 779–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rody, M., ‘Public Environmental Law in Germany’, in Seerden, R. & Heldeweg, M., Comparative Environmental Law in Europe, An Introduction to Public Environmental Law in the EU Member States, Antwerp, Maklu, 1996, pp. 151–191.Google Scholar
Romano, C. P. R., The Peaceful Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: A Pragmatic Approach, London, Kluwer Law International, 2000.Google Scholar
Ronneberg, N. J., ‘An Introduction to the Protection and Indemnity Clubs and the Marine Insurance They Provide’, University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal, 1990, Vol. 3, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M., ‘Surprising Commons’, Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, Vol. 2014(4), pp. 1257–1282.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., ‘Regulation and the Law of Torts’, American Economic Review/Papers & Proceedings, 1991, Vol. 81, pp. 54–58.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., ‘Environmental Liability Law’, in Tietenberg, T. H. (ed.), Innovation in Environmental Policy: Economic and Legal Aspects in Recent Developments in Environmental Enforcement and Liability, Brookfield VT, Edward Elgar, 1992a, pp. 223–243.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Re-thinking the Progressive Agenda, the Reform of the American Regulatory State, New York, The Free Press, 1992b.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., ‘Law versus Private Law in Environmental Regulation: European Union Proposals in the Light of United States Experience’, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 1995a, Vol. 4, pp. 312–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1995b.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., ‘Public Law versus Private Law in Environmental Regulation: European Union Proposals in the Light of United States and German Experiences’, in Eide, E. & Van den Bergh, R. (eds.), Law and Economics of the Environment, Oslo, Juridisk Forlag, 1996, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
Rosen, H. S., Public Finance, Chicago, Irwin, 1999.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D., ‘The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: A “Public Law” Vision of the Tort System’, Harvard Law Review, 1984, Vol. 97(4), pp. 851–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, S., ‘Economic Empirical Analysis of Sanctions for Environmental Violations: A Literature Overview’, Energy, Transport & Environmental Working Papers Series, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Economic Studies, Working Paper No. 2007a-03.CrossRef
Rousseau, S., ‘The Impact of Sanctions and Inspections on Firms’ Environmental Compliance Decisions’, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Economic Studies, Working Paper No. 2007b-04.CrossRef
Rousseau, S., ‘Timing of Environmental Inspections: Survival of the Compliant’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2007c, Vol. 32, pp. 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, S., ‘Evidence of a Filtered Approach to Environmental Monitoring’, European Journal of Law & Economics, 2010, Vol. 29(2), pp. 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, A., ‘Time in Cost-Benefit Analysis’, UC Irvine Law Review, 2014, Vol. 4, pp. 1215–1239.Google Scholar
Rutagarama, E. & Martin, A., ‘Partnerships for Protected Area Conservation in Rwanda’, Geographic Journal, 2006, Vol. 172(4), pp. 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, J., ‘Teaching Policy Instrument Choice in Environmental Law: The Five P’s’, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 2013, Vol. 23, pp. 363–376.Google Scholar
Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carroll, N., Goldstein, A., & Jenkins, M., ‘The Global Status and Trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services’, Nature Sustainability, 2018, Vol. 1(3), pp. 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, J., Ruhl, J. B., & Nash, J. R., ‘Environmental Law in Austerity’, Pace Environmental Law Review, 2015, Vol. 32, pp. 481–491.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A., ‘Environmental Taxation and Revenue for Development’, WIDER Discussion Paper, No. 2003/86, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki, 2003, pp. 1–28.
Sands, Ph., Principles of International Environmental Law I: Frameworks, Standards and Implementation, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sands, Ph., Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, Ph. & Peel, J., Principles of International Environmental Law, 3rd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathe, S. P., ‘Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience’, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2001, Vol. 6, pp. 29–107.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, M. A., ‘Strategy-Proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions’, Journal of Economic Theory, 1975, Vol. 10(2), pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, H.-B., ‘Efficient Third Party Liability of Auditors in Tort Law and in Contract Law’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 2004, Vol. 12, pp. 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, H.-B., ‘Rules versus Standards in Rich and Poor Countries: Precise Legal Norms as Substitutes for Human Capital in Low-Income Countries’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 2006, Vol. 14, p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, H.-B., ‘Can Member State Liability for the Infringment of European Law Deter National Legislators?’, in Eger, Th. & Schäfer, H.-B. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Economics of European Union Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2012, pp. 82–94.Google Scholar
Schmitz, P. W., ‘On the Joint Use of Liability and Safety Regulation’, International Review of Law and Economics, 2000, Vol. 20, pp. 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoep, G. K. & Schuyt, P. M., Feiten en percepties van de sanctionering van milieudelicten en delicten betreffende de volksgezondheid, Leiden, Universiteit Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar
Schultze, Ch., The Public Use of Private Interest, Washington, DC, The Brookings Institution, 1977.Google Scholar
Schulze, W. & D’Arge, R., ‘The Coase Proposition, Information Constraints, and Long Run Equilibrium’, American Economic Review, 1974, Vol. 64(4), pp. 763–772.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A., ‘Statutory Interpretation, Capture, and Tort Law: The Regulatory Compliance Defence’, American Law and Economics Review, 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, G., ‘Mixed Theories of Tort Law: Affirming both Deterrence and Corrective Justice’, Texas Law Review, 1997, Vol. 75, pp. 1801–1834.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P., ‘The Polluter-Pays-Principle’, in Krämer, L. & Orlando, E. (eds.), Principles of Environmental Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, A. & Wilde, L., ‘Intervening in Markets on the Basis of Imperfect Information: A Legal and Economic Analysis’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 1979, Vol. 127, pp. 630–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seerden, R. & Heldeweg, M., ‘Public Environmental Law in the Netherlands’, in Seerden, R. & Heldeweg, M. (eds.), Comparative Environmental Law in Europe: An Introduction to Public Environmental Law in the EU Member States, Antwerp, Maklu, 1996, pp. 269–311.Google Scholar
Segerson, K., ‘An Assessment of Legal Liability as a Market-Based Instrument’, in Freeman, J. & Kolstad, C. D. (eds.), Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 250–270.Google Scholar
Segerson, K. & Tietenberg, T., ‘Defining Efficient Sanctions’, in Tietenberg, T. H. (ed.), Innovation in Environmental Policy, Aldershot, UK/Brockfield, VT, Edward Elgar, 1992, pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
Sellenthin, M. O. & Skogh, G., ‘Property Rights in Endangered Species: The Wolverine Case’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 2004, Vol. 18(2), pp. 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapo, M. S., ‘Tort Law and Environmental Risk’, 1997, Pace Environmental Law Review, Vol. 14(2), pp. 531–544.Google Scholar
Sharon, O., Fishman, S. N., Ruhl, J. B., Olander, L., & Roady, S. E., ‘Ecosystem Services and Judge-Made Law: A Review of Legal Cases in Common Law Countries’, Ecosystem Services, 2018, Vol. 32, pp. 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘On Moral Hazard and Insurance’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979, Vol. 14, pp. 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘Strict Liability versus Negligence’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1980a, Vol. 9(1), pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of Torts’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1980b, Vol. 9, pp. 463–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety’, Journal of Legal Studies, 1984a, Vol. 13, pp. 357–374.CrossRef