Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T13:47:23.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2024

Sherzod Shadikhodjaev
Affiliation:
KDI School of Public Policy and Management
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Energy and the Environment
Exploring the Nexus under International Economic Law
, pp. 294 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

African Union, ‘Africa Speaks with Unified Voice as AU Executive Council Adopts African Common Position on Energy Access and Just Energy Transition’, 22 July 2022, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20220722/africa-speaks-unified-voice-au-executive-council-adopts-african-common.Google Scholar
African Union, ‘African Union Launches World’s Largest Single Electricity Market (AFSEM)’, 4 June 2021, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20210604/african-union-launches-worlds-largest-single-electricity-market-afsem.Google Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang, Pauwelyn, Joost and Puig, Sergio, ‘The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law’, 20 Journal of International Economic Law 217 (2017).Google Scholar
APEC, ‘2021 APEC Ministerial Meeting’, Wellington (New Zealand), 9 November 2021, www.apec.org/meeting-papers/annual-ministerial-meetings/2021/2021-apec-ministerial-meeting.Google Scholar
APEC, ‘Annex C – APEC List of Environmental Goods’, 2012, www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2012/2012_aelm/2012_aelm_annexC.Google Scholar
APEC, ‘APEC Advances Environmental Goods Tariffs Cut’, 11 March 2021, www.apec.org/press/news-releases/2021/0311_mag.Google Scholar
APEC, ‘APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Meeting Joint Statement 2021’, Wellington (New Zealand), 5 June 2021, www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Sectoral-Ministerial-Meetings/Trade/2021_MRT.Google Scholar
APEC Market Access Group, ‘Scoping Study on New and Emerging Environmental Goods’, 2021, www.apec.org/publications/2021/12/scoping-study-on-new-and-emerging-environmental-goods.Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue, ‘The Revised Agreement on Government Procurement: Changes to the Procedural Rules and Other Transparency Provisions’, in Arrowsmith, Sue and Anderson, Robert D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 285336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASEAN Centre for Energy, ‘ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC) 2016–2025, Phase II: 2021–2025’, 2020, https://aseanenergy.org/asean-plan-of-action-for-energy-cooperation-apaec-phase-ii-2021-2025/.Google Scholar
Asmelash, Henok Birhanu, ‘Energy Subsidies and WTO Dispute Settlement: Why Only Renewable Energy Subsidies Are Challenged’, 18 Journal of International Economic Law 261 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmelash, Henok Birhanu, ‘Phasing Out Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the G20: Progress, Challenges, and Ways Forward’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2017.Google Scholar
Asmelash, Henok Birhanu, ‘The Regulation of Environmentally Harmful Fossil Fuel Subsidies: From Obscurity to Prominence in the Multilateral Trading System’, 33 European Journal of International Law 993 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselt, Harro van and Kulovesi, Kati, ‘Seizing the Opportunity: Tackling Fossil Fuel Subsidies under the UNFCCC’, 17 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 357 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselt, Harro van, Merrill, Laura and Kulovesi, Kati, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidies and the Global Climate Regime’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 140155.Google Scholar
Asselt, Harro van, van der Grijp, Nicolien and Oosterhuis, Frans, ‘Greener Public Purchasing: Opportunities for Climate-Friendly Government Procurement under WTO and EU Rules’, 6 Climate Policy 217 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azaria, Danae, Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bacchus, James, ‘The Case for a WTO Climate Waiver’, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Special Report, 2017.Google Scholar
Bacchus, James, ‘Legal Issues with the European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, CATO Briefing Paper No. 125, CATO, 2021.Google Scholar
Bacchus, James, The Willing World: Shaping and Sharing a Sustainable Global Prosperity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Bacchus, James and Manak, Inu, ‘Free Trade in Environmental Goods Will Increase Access to Green Tech’, Free Trade Bulletin No. 80, Cato Institute, 2021.Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘The WTO Legality of the Application of the EU’s Emission Trading System to Aviation’, 23 European Journal of International Law 429 (2012).Google Scholar
Bartenhagen, Erik P., ‘The Intersection of Trade and the Environment: An Examination of the Impact of the TBT Agreement on Ecolabelling Programs’, 17 Virginia Environmental Law Journal 51 (1997).Google Scholar
Bast, Elizabeth et al., ‘Empty Promises: G20 Subsidies to Oil, Gas and Coal Production’, Overseas Development Institute and Oil Change International, 2015.Google Scholar
Bazilian, Morgan, Cuming, Victoria and Kenyon, Thomas, ‘Local-Content Rules for Renewables Projects Do Not Always Work’, 32 Energy Strategy Reviews (2020) 100569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellmann, Christophe and Bulatnikova, Alena, ‘Incorporating Environmental Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements in Chapters and Articles Dealing with Trade in Services’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2022/01, OECD, 2022.Google Scholar
Bellmann, Christophe and van der Ven, Colette, ‘Greening Regional Trade Agreements on Non-Tariff Measures through Technical Barriers to Trade and Regulatory Co-operation’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2020/4, 2020.Google Scholar
Benton, Tim G., Froggatt, Antony and Wellesley, Laura, ‘The Ukraine War and Threats to Food and Energy Security: Cascading Risks from Rising Prices and Supply Disruptions’, Research Paper, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigdeli, Sadeq Z., ‘Resurrecting the Dead – The Expired Non-actionable Subsidies and the Lingering Question of “Green Space”’, 8(2) Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 2 (2011).Google Scholar
Bohmer, Lisa, ‘Breaking: Germany and Vattenfall Settle Long-Running Arbitration Dispute Arising from Nuclear Phase-Out’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 5 March 2021, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar
Bohmer, Lisa, ‘Revealed: Reasons Why Van Houtte, Beechey, and Landau Saw No Legitimate Expectation to Stabilization of Czech Solar Feed-In-Tariffs; Newly-Seen Award also Deemed Intra-EU Objection Untimely’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 23 June 2019, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar
Bohmer, Lisa, ‘[Updated] Canadian Province of Alberta Files NAFTA/USMCA Notice of Intent in Relation to Keystone XL Pipeline Dispute with the USA’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 9 February 2022, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar
Bohmer, Lisa, ‘[Updated] Vattenfall Asks for Discontinuance of ICSID Arbitration against Germany, after Settlement Enters Into Force’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 2 November 2021, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar
Böhringer, Christoph, Carbone, Jared C. and Rutherford, Thomas F., ‘Embodied Carbon Tariffs’, 120 Scandinavian Journal of Economics 183 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boute, Anatole, ‘The Potential Contribution of International Investment Protection Law to Combat Climate Change’, 27 Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 333 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and Gruni, Giovanni, ‘Retooling the Sustainability Standards in EU Free Trade Agreements’, 24 Journal of International Economic Law 25 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Peter D., International Energy Investment Law: The Pursuit of Stability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Canada Border Services Agency, Statement of Reasons Concerning the Final Determinations with Respect to the Dumping and the Subsidizing of Certain Photovoltaic Modules and Laminates Originating in or Exported from the People’s Republic of China, 18 June 2015.Google Scholar
Capobianco, Antonio and Christiansen, Hans, ‘Competitive Neutrality and State-Owned Enterprises: Challenges and Policy Options’, OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers No. 1, 2011.Google Scholar
Carbon Tracker Initiative, ‘Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Coal Capital Expenditures’, 2014, www.carbontracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/CTI-Coal-report-Sept-2014-WEB1.pdf.Google Scholar
Casier, Liesbeth et al., ‘Shining a Light on Fossil Fuel Subsidies at the WTO: How NGOs Can Contribute to WTO Notification and Surveillance’, 13 World Trade Review 603 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cendra, Javier de, ‘Can Emissions Trading Schemes Be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law’, 15 RECIEL 131 (2006).Google Scholar
Centre for Global Development, ‘Developed Countries Are Responsible for 79 Percent of Historical Carbon Emissions’, 2015, www.cgdev.org/media/who-caused-climate-change-historically#:~:text=Developed%20Countries%20Are%20Responsible%20for,Global%20Development%20%7C%20Ideas%20to%20Action.Google Scholar
Centre for Global Development, ‘Developing Countries Are Responsible for 63 Percent of Current Carbon Emissions’, 2015, www.cgdev.org/media/developing-countries-are-responsible-63-percent-current-carbon-emissions.Google Scholar
Centre for International Environmental Law, ‘Plastic & Climate: The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet’, 2019.Google Scholar
Chang, Seung Wha, ‘GATTing a Green Trade Barrier: Eco-Labelling and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade’, 31 Journal of World Trade 137 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlotin, Damien, ‘Natland v. Czech Republic (Part 2 of 2): On the Merits, Tribunal Finds Stabilisation Commitment in Czech Legislation and Breach of That Commitment with Introduction of Solar Levy’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 26 July 2018, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The Law of Environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’, 27 Yale Journal of International Law 59 (2002).Google Scholar
Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros, Ernst, Damien and Andersson, Göran, ‘The Global Grid’, 57 Renewable Energy 372 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazan, Guy, ‘Germany Extends Life of Nuclear Power Plants until Next April’, Financial Times, 18 October 2022, www.ft.com/content/3f48c18f-0348-46b0-a082-3bf07e14e589.Google Scholar
Chelminski, Kathryn, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform in Indonesia: The Struggle for Successful Reform’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 193211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Manjiao, ‘Sustainable Development Provisions in Investment Treaties’, UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2018.Google Scholar
China, ‘Outline of the People’s Republic of China 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2035’, 12 March 2021 (English translation at Centre for Security and Emerging Technology, https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/china-14th-five-year-plan/).Google Scholar
Cleeland, Belinda, ‘ISO: International Standards for Services’, UNCTAD Multi-year Expert Meeting on Trade, Services and Development, 18–20 July 2017, https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/c1mem5_2017_105_S1_Cleeland_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Coady, David et al., ‘How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies?’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/105, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, David, Flamini, Valentina and Sears, Louis, ‘The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies Revisited: Evidence for Developing Countries’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/250, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M. and Levinthal, Daniel A., ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, 35 Administrative Science Quarterly 128 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1470 of 30 March 2015 on State aid SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) Implemented by Romania – Arbitral Award Micula v. Romania of 11 December 2013, OJ L 232, 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Commission Decision of 30 June 2004 on the Aid Scheme Implemented by Sweden for an Exemption from the Tax on Energy from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2004 (2005/468/EC), OJ L 165, 25 June 2005.Google Scholar
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 471/2014 of 13 May 2014 Imposing Definitive Countervailing Duties on Imports of Solar Glass Originating in the People’s Republic of China, OJ L 142, 14 May 2014.Google Scholar
Condon, Bradly J. and Sinha, Tapen, The Role of Climate Change in Global Economic Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Christiane R., Processes and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppens, Dominic, WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corvaglia, Maria Anna, ‘Public Procurement and Private Standards: Ensuring Sustainability under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement’, 19 Journal of International Economic Law 607 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’, 17 Journal of International Economic Law 11 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron, Bernstein, Michael and Stiebert, Seton, ‘Enabling Climate Ambition: Border Carbon Adjustment in Canada and Abroad’, International Institute for Sustainable Development and Clean Prosperity, 2021.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas and Espa, Ilaria (eds.), International Trade in Sustainable Electricity: Regulatory Challenges in International Economic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1239/2013 of 2 December 2013 Imposing a Definitive Countervailing Duty on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Modules and Key Components (i.e. Cells) Originating in or Consigned from the People’s Republic of China, OJ L 325, 5 December 2013.Google Scholar
Council of European Energy Regulators, ‘Key Support Elements of RES in Europe: Moving towards Market Integration’, C15-SDE-49-03, 2016.Google Scholar
Cox, Sadie and Esterly, Sean, ‘Renewable Electricity Standards: Good Practices and Design Considerations’, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-6A20-65507, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Luca, Anna and Baltag, Crina, ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Reflections on UNCITRAL WG III Reform’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 5 November 2021, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/11/05/counterclaims-in-investment-arbitration-reflections-on-uncitral-wg-iii-reform/.Google Scholar
Deane, Felicity, Emissions Trading and WTO Law: A Global Analysis (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dihel, Nora Carina, ‘Understanding Trade in Environmental Services: Key Issues and Prospects’, in Cattaneo, Olivier et al. (eds.), International Trade in Services: New Trends and Opportunities for Developing Countries (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010), pp. 319348.Google Scholar
DiMascio, Nicholas and Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’, 102 American Journal of International Law 48 (2008).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Ming, ‘WTO Regulation of Transnational Private Authority in Global Governance’, 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 867 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufo-López, Rodolfo and Bernal-Agustín, José L., ‘A Comparative Assessment of Net Metering and Net Billing Policies. Study Cases for Spain’, 84 Energy 684 (2015).Google Scholar
Durán, Gracia Marín, ‘Sheltering Government Support to “Green” Electricity: The European Union and the World Trade Organization’, 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 129 (2018).Google Scholar
Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘Energy Efficiency Group’, 14 December 2016, www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/subsidiary-bodies/energy-efficiency-group/.Google Scholar
Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘Finalisation of the Negotiations on the Modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty’, Public Communication approved by the Energy Charter Conference on 24 June 2022, www.energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/CCDECS/2022/CCDEC202210.pdf.Google Scholar
Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘Statistics of ECT Cases (as of 01/06/2022)’, www.energychartertreaty.org/fileadmin/user_upload/All_statistics_-_1_June_2022.pdf.Google Scholar
Energypedia, ‘Feed-in Premiums (FIP)’, https://energypedia.info/wiki/Feed-in_Premiums_(FIP).Google Scholar
Energypedia, ‘Feed-in Tariffs (FIT)’, https://energypedia.info/wiki/Feed-in_Tariffs_(FIT).Google Scholar
Epps, Tracey and Green, Andrew, Reconciling Trade and Climate: How the WTO Can Help Address Climate Change (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espa, Ilaria and Durán, Gracia Marín, ‘Renewable Energy Subsidies and WTO Law: Time to Rethink the Case for Reform Beyond Canada – Renewable Energy / Fit Program’, 21 Journal of International Economic Law 621 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espa, Ilaria and Rolland, Sonia E., ‘Subsidies, Clean Energy, and Climate Change’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum, 2015.Google Scholar
EU, Commission Decision of 20 December 2012 Terminating the Anti-subsidy Proceeding Concerning Imports of Bioethanol Originating in the United States of America and Terminating the Registration of Such Imports Imposed by Regulation (EU) No. 771/2012, OJ L 352, 21 December 2012.Google Scholar
EU’s Concept Paper on WTO Modernization, 18 September 2018, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/september/tradoc_157331.pdf.Google Scholar
Euractive, ‘LEAK: Exit from Energy Charter Treaty “unavoidable”, EU Commission Says’, 9 February 2023, www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/exit-from-energy-charter-treaty-unavoidable-eu-commission-says/.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Questions and Answers’, 14 July 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_3661.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Commission Notice on the Recovery of Unlawful and Incompatible State Aid (2019/C 247/01)’, OJ C 247/1, 23 July 2019.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Commission Services Position Paper on the Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment for the FTA between the EU and the Republic of India’, March 2010, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘European Commission Services’ Position Paper on the Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations on a Trade Agreement between the European Union and Indonesia’, 26 June 2020, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘European Commission Services’ Position Paper on the Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Morocco’, April 2015, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘European Commission Services’ Position Paper on the Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between the European Union and Jordan’, December 2016, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘European Green Deal: Agreement Reached on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)’, 13 December 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7719.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘The European Green Deal’, Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2019) 640 final, 11 December 2019.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the Document: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2021) 643 final, 14 July 2021.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Non-paper from the European Commission: Next Steps as Regards the EU, Euratom and Member States’ Membership in the Energy Charter Treaty’, 2023, www.euractiv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/02/Non-paper_ECT_nextsteps.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Adopts Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework to Further Support Transition towards Net-Zero Economy’, 9 March 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1563.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Approves German Aid Scheme for Renewable Energy (EEG 2012); Orders Partial Recovery’, 25 November 2014, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_14_2122.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Opens In-Depth Investigation into Arbitration Award in Favour of Antin to Be Paid by Spain’, 19 July 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_3783.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Requires Italy to Recover around €18 Million Incompatible State Aid from Metal Producers Portovesme, ILA and Eurallumina’, 23 February 2011, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_11_215.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework’ (applicable as of 9 March 2023), https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/state-aid/ukraine_en.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Trade and Climate: EU and Partner Countries Launch the “Coalition of Trade Ministers on Climate”’, 19 January 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_248.Google Scholar
European Committee for Standardization, ‘Mandate M/517 for the Programming and Development of Horizontal Service Standards: Phase I Final Report’, 2015, https://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CEN/WhatWeDo/Fields/Services/FinalReportPhase1-M517.pdf.Google Scholar
Falcão, Tatiana, ‘Toward Carbon Tax Internationalism: The EU Border Carbon Adjustment Proposal’, 98 Tax Notes International 1047 (2020).Google Scholar
Farah, Paolo D. and Cima, Elena, ‘Energy Trade and the WTO: Implications for Renewable Energy and the OPEC Cartel’, 16 Journal of International Economic Law 707 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtner, Isabel, The Law and Politics of WTO Waivers: Stability and Flexibility in Public International Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleury, Julien Sylvestre and Marcoux, Jean-Michel, ‘The US Shaping of State-Owned Enterprise Disciplines in the Trans-Pacific Partnership’, 19 Journal of International Economic Law 445 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florou, Aikaterini, ‘The UK Supreme Court Judgment in Micula v. Romania: A Landmark Judgment for the Relationship between EU Law and International Investment Law?’, 36 ICSID Review 295 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowlie, Meredith and Reguant, Mar, ‘Challenges in the Measurement of Leakage Risk’, 108 AEA Papers and Proceedings 124 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, K. C. and Korinek, Jane, ‘Economics of Export Restrictions as Applied to Industrial Raw Materials’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 155, 2013.Google Scholar
García-Castrillón, Carmen Otero, ‘Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion’, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Investor-State Arbitration Series, Paper No. 17, 2016.Google Scholar
Gari, Gabriel, ‘Is the WTO’s Approach to International Standards on Services Outdated?’, 19 Journal of International Economic Law 589 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gáspár-Szilágyi, Szilárd and Usynin, Maxim, ‘The Uneasy Relationship between Intra-EU Investment Tribunals and the Court of Justice’s Achmea Judgment’, 4 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review 29 (2019).Google Scholar
GATT, ‘Report by the Working Party on Border Tax Adjustments’, L/3464, 20 November 1970.Google Scholar
GATT, Council – Minutes of Meeting – Held in the Centre William Rappard on 22 May 1986, GATT Doc., C/M/198, 12 June 1986.Google Scholar
GATT, Uruguay Round – Group of Negotiations on Services – Services Sectoral Classification List – Note by the Secretariat, MTN.GNS/W/120, 10 July 1991.Google Scholar
Gerasimchuk, Ivetta et al., ‘A Guidebook to Reviews of Fossil Fuel Subsidies: From Self-Reports to Peer Learning’, International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2017.Google Scholar
Global Ecolabelling Network, ‘All Ecolabels on Energy’, www.ecolabelindex.com/ecolabels/?st=category,energy.Google Scholar
Gordon, Kathryn and Pohl, Joachim, ‘Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: A Survey’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment No. 2011/01, 2011.Google Scholar
Government of Canada, ‘Consultation on Border Carbon Adjustments’, 1 February 2022, www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/consultations/2021/border-carbon-adjustments.html.Google Scholar
Government of Canada, ‘Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada’, 28 April 2021, www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/lone.aspx?lang=eng.Google Scholar
Gruère, Guillaume, ‘A Characterization of Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes’, OECD Environment Working Paper No. 62, ENV/WKP(2013)9, 2013.Google Scholar
Hakura, Dalia and Jaumotte, Florence, ‘The Role of Inter- and Intraindustry Trade in Technology Diffusion’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/99/58 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, James, ‘Environmental Counterclaims in Investor–State Arbitration’, 17 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 479 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegde, Vineet and Wouters, Jan, ‘Special and Differential Treatment under the World Trade Organization: A Legal Typology’, 24 Journal of International Economic Law 551 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Dirk, Faure, Michael G. and Dominioni, Goran, ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle in Climate Change Law: An Economic Appraisal’, 10 Climate Law 94 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, ‘A Duty to Consult Foreign Investors When Changing the Regulatory Framework? Implications for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention and Beyond’, 21 Journal of World Investment & Trade 698 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Jarrod, ‘ANALYSIS: In New Award, Italian Renewables Changes Appear Less Dramatic Than Those in Recent Spain Case, Thus Leading to Failure of Blusun’s FET Claim; Arbitrators Disagree on Expropriation Assessment’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 7 June 2017, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar
Hobér, Kaj, The Energy Charter Treaty: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M., Maskus, Keith E. and Saggi, Kamal, ‘Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options’, 33 World Development 1587 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Megan, ‘Local Content Requirements Threaten Renewable Energy Uptake: Featuring a List of Local Content Requirements in Wind and Solar Industries’, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 6 December 2021, www.piie.com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/local-content-requirements-threaten-renewable-energy-uptake.Google Scholar
Holzer, Kateryna, ‘Addressing Tensions and Avoiding Disputes: Specific Trade Concerns in the TBT Committee’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2018–11, 31 October 2018.Google Scholar
Holzer, Kateryna, Carbon-Related Border Adjustment and WTO Law (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, Kateryna, ‘Proposals on Carbon-Related Border Adjustments: Prospects for WTO Compliance’, 1 Carbon & Climate Law Review 51 (2010).Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary and Clarke, Peggy A., ‘Rethinking Subsidy Disciplines for the Future: Policy Options for Reform’, 20 Journal of International Economic Law 673 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘To B(TA) or Not to B(TA)? On the Legality and Desirability of Border Tax Adjustments from a Trade Perspective’, 34 The World Economy 1911 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Sapir, André, ‘Can Border Carbon Taxes Fit into the Global Trade Regime?’, Policy Brief No. 2013/06, Bruegel, 2013.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wijkström, Erik N., ‘In the Shadow of the DSU: Addressing Specific Trade Concerns in the WTO SPS and TBT Committees’, 47 Journal of World Trade 729 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert, ‘Climate Mitigation Subsidies and the WTO Legal Framework: A Policy Analysis’, International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2010.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert and Eliason, Antonia L., ‘Domestic and International Strategies to Address Climate Change: An Overview of the WTO Legal Issues’, in Cottier, Thomas, Nartova, Olga and Bigdeli, Sadeq Z. (eds.), International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 4893.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert and Regan, Donald, ‘The Product/Process Distinction – An Illusory Basis for Disciplining “Unilateralism” in Trade Policy’, 11 European Journal of International Law 249 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., ‘Reassessing APEC’s Role as a Trans-Regional Economic Architecture: Legal and Policy Dimensions’, 16 Journal of International Economic Law 119 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo and Samans, Richard (eds.), The Law and Economics of a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde et al., Local Content Requirements: A Global Problem (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2013).Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Charnovitz, Steve and Kim, Jisun, Global Warming and the World Trading System (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009).Google Scholar
Hydropower Sustainability Council, ‘Hydropower Sustainability Standard’, www.hydrosustainability.org/standard-overview.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Glossary’, 2022 (Interim) Edition, 2022.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Near Term and Promising Long Term Options for the Deployment of Thorium Based Nuclear Energy’, Final Report of a Coordinated Research Project No. IAEA-TECDOC-2009, 2022.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Nuclear Safety Conventions’, www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-safety-conventions.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Thorium’s Long-Term Potential in Nuclear Energy: New IAEA Analysis’, 13 March 2023, www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/thoriums-long-term-potential-in-nuclear-energy-new-iaea-analysis.Google Scholar
IEA, ‘Carrots and Sticks: Taxing and Subsidising Energy’, Note on Energy Subsidies and Taxes, 17 January 2006, www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/oil_subsidies.pdf.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Energy Security: Ensuring the Uninterrupted Availability of Energy Sources at an Affordable Price’, www.iea.org/areas-of-work/ensuring-energy-security.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Energy Subsidies: Tracking the Impact of Fossil-Fuel Subsidies’, www.iea.org/topics/energy-subsidies.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Energy Technology Perspectives 2020’, 2020.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘ETP Clean Energy Technology Guide’, 21 September 2022, www.iea.org/articles/etp-clean-energy-technology-guide.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for CCUS: An IEA CCUS Handbook’, 2022.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘Technology Roadmap: Smart Grids’, 2011, www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-smart-grids.Google Scholar
IAEA, ‘World Energy Investment 2020’, 2020, www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2020.Google Scholar
IEA–RETD, ‘Driving Renewable Energy for Transport: Next Generation Policy Instruments for Renewable Transport (Res-T-Next)’, 2015.Google Scholar
IMF, OECD, World Bank and WTO, ‘Subsidies, Trade, and International Cooperation’, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ‘The Evidence Is Clear: The Time for Action Is Now. We Can Halve Emissions by 2030’, 4 April 2022, www.ipcc.ch/2022/04/04/ipcc-ar6-wgiii-pressrelease/.Google Scholar
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation, ‘ILAC MRA and Signatories’, https://ilac.org/ilac-mra-and-signatories/.Google Scholar
IRENA, ‘Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050’, 2018.Google Scholar
IRENA, ‘International Standardisation in the Field of Renewable Energy’, 2013.Google Scholar
IRENA, ‘Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018’, 2019.Google Scholar
IRENA, IEA and REN21, ‘Renewable Energy Policies in a Time of Transition’, 2018.Google Scholar
ISDS Platform, ‘Vattenfall vs. Germany I: Coal-fired Electric Plant’, April 2021, www.isds.bilaterals.org/vattenfall-vs-germany-i-coal-fired.Google Scholar
ISEAL Alliance, ‘ISEAL Community Members’, www.isealalliance.org/iseal-community-members.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Tomoko, ‘The Role of the Precautionary and Polluter Pays Principles in Assessing Compensation’, RIETI Discussion Paper Series No. 15-E-107, 2015.Google Scholar
Ismer, R. and Neuhoff, K., ‘Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible Way to Address Nonparticipation in Emission Trading’, CMI Working Paper No. 36, 2004.Google Scholar
ISO, ‘A Committee to Support Developing Countries: DEVCO’, www.iso.org/devco.html.Google Scholar
ISO, ‘Environmental Labels and Declarations: How ISO Standards Help’, 2012.Google Scholar
ISO, ‘Environmental Labels’, 2019.Google Scholar
ISO, ‘ISO Strategy for Service Standardization’, 2016, www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100393.pdf.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1969).Google Scholar
Jain, Abhishek, Agrawal, Shalu and Ganesan, Karthik, ‘Lessons from the World’s Largest Subsidy Benefit Transfer Scheme: The Case of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Subsidy Reform in India’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 212228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Bennett, ‘Canadian Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures’, 2019, www.bennettjones.com/Publications-Section/Guides/Canadian-AntiDumping-and-Countervailing-Duty-Measures.Google Scholar
Karapinar, Baris, ‘Export Restrictions and the WTO Law: How to Reform the “Regulatory Deficiency”’, 45 Journal of World Trade 1139 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karapinar, Baris and Holzer, Kateryna, ‘Legal Implications of the Use of Export Taxes in Addressing Carbon Leakage: Competing Border Adjustment Measures’, 10 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 15 (2012).Google Scholar
Karttunen, Marianna B., Transparency in the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements: The Real Jewel in the WTO’s Crown (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, Céline and Saffirio, Camila, ‘Good Regulatory Practices and Co-operation in Trade Agreements: A Historical Perspective and Stocktaking’, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Paper No. 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Christine and Weber, Rolf H., ‘Carbon-Related Border Tax Adjustment: Mitigating Climate Change or Restricting International Trade?’, 10 World Trade Review 497 (2011).Google Scholar
Keene, Amelia, ‘The Incorporation and Interpretation of WTO-Style Environmental Exceptions in International Investment Agreements’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 62 (2017).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Matthew, ‘The Adverse Effects of Technological Innovation under WTO Subsidy Rules’, 19 World Trade Review 511 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Matthew, WTO Dispute Settlement and the TRIPS Agreement: Applying Intellectual Property Standards in a Trade Law Framework (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khachvani, David, ‘Non-compensable Regulation versus Regulatory Expropriation: Are Climate Change Regulations Compensable?’, 35 ICSID Review 154 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kigali Communique, ‘Ensuring a Just and Equitable Energy Transition in Africa: Seven Transformative Actions for SDG 7’, 19 May 2022, www.mininfra.gov.rw/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=44024&token=c9d8a3e4e9ad4d22aa3c3b883055c9426760c584.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeonghoi, ‘Recent Trends in Export Restrictions on Raw Materials’, in OECD, The Economic Impact of Export Restrictions on Raw Materials (OECD Trade Policy Studies, 2010), pp. 1357.Google Scholar
Kläger, Roland, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, Masami and Koplow, Doug, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Approaches and Valuation’, Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS7220, World Bank, 2015.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Przemyslaw, Rabaioli, Daniel and Vallejo, Sebastian, ‘International Technology Transfer Measures in an Interconnected World: Lessons and Policy Implications’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 206, 2017.Google Scholar
Kuntze, Jan-Christoph and Moerenhout, Tom, ‘Local Content Requirements and the Renewable Energy Industry – A Good Match?’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuriyama, Carlos, ‘The APEC List of Environmental Goods’, APEC Policy Support Unit, Policy Brief No. 5, 2012, www.apec.org/publications/2012/11/the-apec-list-of-environmental-goods.Google Scholar
Kuriyama, Carlos, ‘A Review of the APEC List of Environmental Goods’, APEC Policy Support Unit, Policy Brief No. 41, 2021, www.apec.org/publications/2021/10/a-review-of-the-apec-list-of-environmental-goods.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, The WTO and International Investment Law: Converging Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, Martin von, Deconinck, Koen and Bastien, Véronique, ‘Trade-Related International Regulatory Co-operation: A Theoretical Framework’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 195, 2016.Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal, Pons, Geneviève and Leturcq, Pierre, ‘Greening EU Trade 3: A European Border Carbon Adjustment Proposal’, Policy Paper, Europe Jacques Delors, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawder, David, ‘U.S. Floats New Steel, Aluminum Tariffs Based on Carbon Emissions’, Reuters, 8 December 2022, www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/us-floats-new-steel-aluminum-tariffs-based-carbon-emissions-2022-12-08/.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong-Shik, ‘Regulatory Autonomy under the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Implications of Korea–Import Bans, and Testing and Certification Requirements for Radionuclides’, 20 World Trade Review 321 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legum, Barton and Petculescu, Ioana, ‘GATT Article XX and International Investment Law’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 340362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Less, Cristina Tébar and McMillan, Steven, ‘Achieving the Successful Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies: Trade-Related Aspects’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2005-2, COM/ENV/TD(2004)33/FINAL, 2005.Google Scholar
Levashova, Yulia, ‘The Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations for Transgressions in Host States through International Investment Law’, 14 Ultrecht Law Review 40 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévesque, Céline, ‘The Inclusion of GATT Article XX Exceptions in IIAs: A Potentially Risky Policy’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 363370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Notice of Arbitration (6 September 2013).Google Scholar
López-Rodríguez, Ana Mercedes, ‘The Sun behind the Clouds? Enforcement of Renewable Energy Awards in the EU’, 8 Transnational Environmental Law 279 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luca, Anna De, ‘Indirect Expropriations and Regulatory Takings: What Role for the “Legitimate Expectations” of Foreign Investors?’, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio (ed.), General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 5875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle and Trachtman, Joel P., ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods’, 36 Journal of World Trade 811 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, Andrei et al., ‘Carbon Leakage: An Overview’, Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Special Report No. 79 (2013).Google Scholar
Marhold, Anna-Alexandra, Energy in International Trade Law: Concepts, Regulations and Changing Markets (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marhold, Anna-Alexandra, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform in the WTO: Options for Constraining Dual Pricing in the Multilateral Trading System’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2017.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith, ‘Research and Development Subsidies: A Need for WTO Disciplines?’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum, 2015.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Wataru and Zakia, Adam, ‘Commentary: Fossil Fuel Consumption Subsidies Bounced Back Strongly in 2018’, 13 June 2019, www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2019/june/fossil-fuel-consumption-subsidies-bounced-back-strongly-in-2018.html.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. and Neven, Damien J., ‘Greening the WTO Environmental Goods Agreement, Tariff Concessions, and Policy Likeness’, 22 Journal of International Economic Law 373 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wolfe, Robert, ‘Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More’, 16 World Trade Review 1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayeda, Graham, ‘Integrating Environmental Impact Assessments into International Investment Agreements: Global Administrative Law and Transnational Cooperation’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 131 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Benoit, The International Law on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniels, Devin, Molina, Ana Cristina and Wijkström, Erik, ‘How Does the Regular Work of WTO Influence Regional Trade Agreements? The Case of International Standards and the TBT Committee’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2018-06, 2018.Google Scholar
McDonald, Jan, ‘Domestic Regulation, International Standards, and Technical Barriers to Trade’, 4 World Trade Review 249 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlade, Christophe and Ekins, Paul, ‘The Geographical Distribution of Fossil Fuels Unused When Limiting Global Warming to 2ᵒC’, 517 Nature 187 (2015).Google Scholar
Mclntyre, Owen and Mosedale, Thomas, ‘The Precautionary Principle as a Norm of Customary International Law’, 9 Journal of Environmental Law 221 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehling, Michael A. et al., ‘Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action’, 113 American Journal of International Law 433 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Joshua, ‘Climate Change and Trade – The EU Aviation Directive and the WTO’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 111 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Laura et al., ‘Making the Switch: From Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Sustainable Energy’, Nordic Council of Ministers, 2017.Google Scholar
Merrill, Laura ‘Tackling Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Climate Change: Levelling the Energy Playing Field’, Nordic Council of Ministers, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Timothy, ‘Explaining Energy Disputes at the World Trade Organization’, 17 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 391 (2017).Google Scholar
Mikulich, Christine, ‘ISO 14000–14001, The Developing World’s Perspective’, 17 Tulane Environmental Law Journal 117 (2003).Google Scholar
Miles, Kate, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minas, Stephen, ‘The Paris Agreement’s Technology Framework and the Need for “Transformational Change”’, 2020(4) Carbon & Climate Law Review 241 (2020).Google Scholar
Ministry of Commerce and Industry (India), Final Findings: Anti-subsidy/Countervailing Duty Investigation Concerning Imports of Castings for Wind Operated Electricity Generators, Whether or Not Machined, in Raw, Finished or Sub-assembled Form, or as a Part of a Sub-Assembly, or as a Part of an Equipment/Component Meant for Wind-Operated Electricity Generators, Originating in or Exported from China PR, 27 November 2015.Google Scholar
Miroudot, Sébastien, ‘The Linkages between Open Services Markets and Technology Transfer’, OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 29, TD/TC/WP(2005)9/FINAL, 2006.Google Scholar
Moïsé, Evdokia and Rubínová, Stela, ‘Sustainability Impact Assessments of Free Trade Agreements: A Critical Review’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 255, 2021.Google Scholar
Molenbroek, Edith et al., ‘Savings and Benefits of Global Regulations for Energy Efficient Products: A “Cost of Non-World” Study, Final Report’, European Commission, 2015.Google Scholar
Molina, Ana Cristina and Khoroshavina, Vira, ‘TBT Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: To What Extent Do They Go beyond the WTO TBT Agreement?’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2015-09, 2015.Google Scholar
Monteiro, José-Antonio, ‘Typology of Environment-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements’, WTO Working Paper No. ERSD-2016-13, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 637687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, James, Emissions Trading Schemes under International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Naiki, Yoshiko, ‘Meta-Regulation of Private Standards: The Role of Regional and International Organizations in Comparison with the WTO’, 20 World Trade Review 1 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, David et al., ‘Moving to a Low-Carbon Economy: The Impact of Policy Pathways on Fossil Fuel Asset Values’, Climate Policy Initiative, 2014.Google Scholar
New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade, ‘Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) Negotiations’, www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/trade-and-climate/agreement-on-climate-change-trade-and-sustainability-accts-negotiations/.Google Scholar
New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade, ‘New Zealand with Costa Rica, Fiji, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland Have Launched a New Initiative – the Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS)’, www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/trade-and-climate/agreement-on-climate-change-trade-and-sustainability-accts-negotiations/.Google Scholar
New Zealand Government, ‘Joint Statement: Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) at MC12’, 15 June 2022, www.beehive.govt.nz/release/joint-statement-agreement-climate-change-trade-and-sustainability-accts-mc12.Google Scholar
Nordås, Hildegunn Kyvik and Steenblik, Ronald, ‘Environmental Services in the APEC Region: Definition, Challenges and Opportunities’, APEC Group on Services, 2021.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-Riding in International Climate Policy’, 105 American Economic Review 1339 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD, ‘Agreement Reached at OECD to End Export Credit Support for Unabated Coal-Fired Power Plants’, 22 October 2021, www.oecd.org/newsroom/agreement-reached-at-oecd-to-end-export-credit-support-for-unabated-coal-fired-power-plants.htm.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Cases Handled by the National Contact Points for Responsible Business Conduct’, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/Flyer-OECD-National-Contact-Points.pdf.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘The Climate Action Monitor 2022: Helping Countries Advance Towards Net Zero’, OECD, 2022.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal’, www.oecd.org/climate-change/finance-usd-100-billion-goal/.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Climate Policy Leadership in an Interconnected World: What Role for Border Carbon Adjustments?’, 2020.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Effects of Eco-Labelling Schemes: Compilation of Recent Studies’, COM/ENV/TD(2004)34/FINAL, 2005.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘The Environmental Goods and Services Industry: Manual for Data Collection and Analysis’, 1999, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/archive/EPEA/EnvIndustry_Manual_for_data_collection.PDF.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes’, Policy Perspectives: Synthesis Report, 2016.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Going Green: Best Practices for Sustainable Procurement’, 2015.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges’, 2013.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: 2011 Edition’, 2011.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘OECD Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels: Database Brochure’, 2019, www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/data/OECD-Fossil-Fuels-Support-database-brochure-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘OECD Work on Support for Fossil Fuels’, www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Overcoming Barriers to International Investment in Clean Energy’, OECD, 2015.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘The Role of OECD Instruments on Responsible Business Conduct in Progressing Environmental Objectives’, 2021.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘State-Owned Enterprises as Global Competitors: A Challenge or an Opportunity?’, 2016.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, ‘Support for Fossil Fuels Almost Doubled in 2021, Slowing Progress toward International Climate Goals, according to New Analysis from OECD and IEA’, 29 August 2022, www.oecd.org/newsroom/support-for-fossil-fuels-almost-doubled-in-2021-slowing-progress-toward-international-climate-goals-according-to-new-analysis-from-oecd-and-iea.htm.OECD and IEA, ‘Update on Recent Progress in Reform of Inefficient Fossil-Fuel Subsidies That Encourage Wasteful Consumption’, 2019.Google Scholar
OECD/WTO, ‘Facilitating Trade through Regulatory Cooperation: The Case of the WTO’s TBT/SPS Agreements and Committees’, 2019.Google Scholar
Oehler, Richard L. and Vega, Vivian R., ‘Worldwide Vaccine Inequality Threatens to Unleash the Next COVID-19 Variant’, 123 International Journal of Infectious Diseases 133 (2022).Google ScholarPubMed
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, OECD and World Bank, ‘Analysis of the Scope of Energy Subsidies and Suggestions for the G-20 Initiative’, Joint Report (prepared for submission to the G-20 Summit Meeting in Toronto (Canada), 26–27 June 2010), 2010.Google Scholar
Ortolani, Pietro, ‘Intra-EU Arbitral Awards vis-à-vis Article 107 TFEU: State Aid Law as a Limit to Compliance’, 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 118 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osakwe, Chiedu, Yu, Dayong and Beslać, Petra, ‘Export Duty Commitments: The Treaty Dialogue and the Pattern of Commitments’, in Dadush, Uri and Osakwe, Chiedu (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 741763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaefstratiou, Athina Fouchard, ‘Stabilisation Clauses in Long-Term Investment Contracts: Their Evolution and Their Application by Investment Tribunals’, in Cima, Elena and Mbengue, Makane Moïse (eds.), A Multifaceted Approach to Trade Liberalisation and Investment Protection in the Energy Sector (Leiden and Boston: Brill, Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 4367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Ian, Black, Simon and Vernon, Nate, ‘Still Not Getting Energy Prices Right: A Global and Country Update of Fossil Fuel Subsidies’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/21/236, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partiti, Enrico, ‘What Use Is an Unloaded Gun? The Substantive Discipline of the WTO TBT Code of Good Practice and Its Application to Private Standards Pursuing Public Objectives’, 20 Journal of International Economic Law 829 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauer, Stefan U., ‘Including Electricity Imports in California’s Cap-And-Trade Program: A Case Study of a Border Carbon Adjustment in Practice’, 31 The Electricity Journal 39 (2018).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law’, Working Paper No. NI WP 07-02, Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost and Kleimann, David, ‘Trade Related Aspects of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Legal Assessment’, Briefing, European Parliament, 2020.Google Scholar
Peels, Rafael et al., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in International Trade and Investment Agreements: Implications for States, Business, and Workers’, ILO Research Paper No. 13, 2016.Google Scholar
Pereira, Ricardo and Gough, Orla, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources in the Twenty-first Century: Natural Resource Governance and the Right to Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples under International Law’, 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 451 (2013).Google Scholar
Perrez, Franz Xaver, ‘The Relationship between “Permanent Sovereignty” and the Obligation Not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage’, 26 Environmental Law 1187 (1996).Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Transforming World Trade and Investment Law for Sustainable Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Sylvia and Pickard, Jim, ‘UK to Propose Carbon Border Tax as Part of Steel Industry Aid Package’, Financial Times, 24 January 2023, www.ft.com/content/94eab3e5-87dd-424f-9c5a-be0d79d7cb5c.Google Scholar
Pogoretskyy, Vitaliy, ‘Energy Dual Pricing in International Trade: Subsidies and Anti-dumping Perspectives’, in Selivanova, Yulia (ed.), Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law: WTO, NAFTA and Energy Charter (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011), pp. 181228.Google Scholar
Pogoretskyy, Vitaliy, Freedom of Transit and Access to Gas Pipeline Networks under WTO Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerleau, Shuting, ‘What’s in the Carbon Border Adjustment Bill Introduced by Senator Whitehouse?’, 8 June 2022, Niskanen Center, www.niskanencenter.org/whats-in-the-carbon-border-adjustment-bill-introduced-by-senator-whitehouse.Google Scholar
Prag, Andrew, ‘The Climate Challenge and Trade: Would Border Carbon Adjustments Accelerate or Hinder Climate Action?’, OECD, 2020.Google Scholar
Prag, Andrew, Lyon, Thomas and Russillo, Aimée, ‘Multiplication of Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes (ELIS): Implications for Environment and Trade’, OECD Environment Working Paper No. 106, ENV/WKP(2016)8, 2016.Google Scholar
Probst, Benedict et al., ‘The Short-Term Costs of Local Content Requirements in the Indian Solar Auctions’, 5 Nature Energy 842 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Forced Technology Transfer and the US–China Trade War: Implications for International Economic Law’, 22 Journal of International Economic Law 743 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Reforming WTO Discipline on Export Duties: Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Economic Development and Environmental Protection’, 46 Journal of World Trade 1147 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quick, Reinhard and Lau, Christian, ‘Environmentally Motivated Tax Distinctions and WTO Law: The European Commission’s Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy in Light of the “Like Product‐” and “PPM‐” Debates’, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 419 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinsch, William A., Benson, Emily and Puga, Catherine, ‘Environmental Goods Agreement: A New Frontier or an Old Stalemate?’, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2021.Google Scholar
REN21, ‘Renewables 2019: Global Status Report’, 2019.Google Scholar
Ripinsky, Sergey, ‘The System of Gas Dual Pricing in Russia: Compatibility with WTO Rules’, 3 World Trade Review 463 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Hannah, Roser, Max and Rosado, Pablo (2020), ‘CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, OurWorldInData.org, 2020, https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.Google Scholar
Rive, Vernon, ‘Anatomy of an International Norm Entrepreneur: The Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 156172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roffe, Pedro, ‘UNCTAD: Code of Conduct for the Transfer of Technology – Progress and Issues under Negotiation’, 14 Journal of World Trade Law 160 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokadiya, Shikha and Yang, Zifei, ‘Overview of Global Zero-Emission Vehicle Mandate Programs’, International Council on Clean Transportation, Briefing, 2019.Google Scholar
Rolland, Sonia E., Development at the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubini, Luca, ‘Ain’t Wastin’ Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, The SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 525 (2012).Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘The Application of BITs in Time of Economic Crisis: Limits to Their Coverage, Necessity and the Relevance of WTO Law’, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio et al. (eds.), General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad, Stucki, Bryce Wilson and Deutschmann, Joshua, ‘The Reform of Energy Subsidies in Iran: The Role of Cash Transfers’, 51 Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 1144 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, Philippe et al., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 4th ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvage, Jehan, ‘The Stringency of Environmental Regulations and Trade in Environmental Goods’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper, COM/TAD/ENV/JWPTE(2013)33/FINAL, 2014.Google Scholar
Savatic, Filip, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: Lessons from the Indonesian Case’, Studies No. 06/16, IDDRI, 2016.Google Scholar
Scherer, Maxi (ed.), International Arbitration in the Energy Sector (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Scherer, Maxi, Bruce, Stuart and Reschke, Juliane, ‘Environmental Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 36 ICSID Review 413 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Do Investment Treaties Chill Unilateral State Regulation to Mitigate Climate Change?’, 24 Journal of International Arbitration 469 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Nico J., ‘Natural Resources, Permanent Sovereignty Over’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Vol. VII, pp. 535544.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nicolaas, ‘Self-Determination of Peoples and Sovereignty over Natural Wealth and Resources’, in UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development (New York and Geneva: UN, 2013), pp. 95102.Google Scholar
Selivanova, Julia, ‘World Trade Organization Rules and Energy Pricing: Russia’s Case’, 38 Journal of World Trade 559 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selivanova, Yulia (ed.), Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law: WTO, NAFTA and Energy Charter (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Checking RTA Compatibility with Global Trade Rules: WTO Litigation Practice and Implications from the Transparency Mechanism for RTAs’, 45 Journal of World Trade 529 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘First WTO Judicial Review of Climate Change Subsidy Issues’, 107 American Journal of International Law 864 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘How to Pass a Pass-through Test: The Case of Input Subsidies’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 621 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘India – Certain Measures Relating to Solar Cells and Solar Modules’, 111 American Journal of International Law 139 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Industrial Policy in Asia-Pacific Integration: Localization Measures and Subsidies in ASEAN Countries, 31 Asia Pacific Law Review 618 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, Industrial Policy and the World Trade Organization: Between Legal Constraints and Flexibilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Input Cost Adjustments and WTO Anti-Dumping Law: A Closer Look at the EU Practice’, 18 World Trade Review 81 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment’, 21 Journal of International Economic Law 885 (2018).Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Promotion of “Green” Electricity and International Dispute Settlement: Trade and Investment Issues’, 49 International Lawyer 343 (2016).Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to “Green” the SCM Agreement?’, 14 World Trade Review 479 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Russia and Energy Issues under the WTO System’, 50 Journal of World Trade 705 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Steel Overcapacity and the Global Trading System’, 16 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 179 (2021).Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Technological Neutrality and Regulation of Digital Trade: How Far Can We Go?’, 32 European Journal of International Law 1221 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘United States – Safeguard Measure on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products’, 116 American Journal of International Law 842 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod and Park, Nohyoung, ‘Cessation and Reparation in the GATT/WTO Legal System: A View from the Law of State Responsibility’, 41 Journal of World Trade 1237 (2007).Google Scholar
Shao, Xuan, ‘Environmental and Human Rights Counterclaims in International Investment Arbitration: At the Crossroads of Domestic and International Law’, 24 Journal of International Economic Law 157 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Radhika, ‘Countervailing Duty Laws in India’, 11 December 2015, www.lakshmisri.com/insights/articles/countervailing-duty-laws-in-india/#.Google Scholar
Sherlock, Molly F., ‘Clean Vehicle Tax Credits in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022’, US Congressional Research Service, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11996.Google Scholar
Sifonios, David, Environmental Process and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law (Cham: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Sklarew, Jennifer F., ‘How Can China and India Serve as Models for Developing Nations Striving to Build Absorption Capacity for Renewable Energy Technologies?’, 2 Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review 181 (2011).Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 3rd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, Suzanne A., ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’, 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1037 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Special Eurobarometer 492, ‘Europeans’ Attitudes on EU Energy Policy: Summary’, May 2019, https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/survey/getsurveydetail/instruments/special/surveyky/2238.Google Scholar
Steenblik, Ronald, Sauvage, Jehan and Timiliotis, Christina, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidies and the Global Trade Regime’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 121139.Google Scholar
Stefan, Florian, ‘A Reflection on the Czech Republic’s Solar Investment Arbitration Successes’, PSL LexisNexis News Analysis, 1 October 2019, www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/energy/document/412012/5X5P-71G3-CGXG-01J7-00000–00/A_reflection_on_the_Czech_Republic_s_solar_investment_arbitration_successes.Google Scholar
Struckmann, Kai, Forwood, Genevra and Kadri, Aqeel, ‘Investor-State Arbitrations and EU State Aid Rules: Conflict or Co-existence?’, 15 European State Aid Law Quarterly 258 (2016).Google Scholar
Swanson, Ana, ‘U.S. Proposes Green Steel Club That Would Levy Tariffs On Outliers’, The New York Times, 7 December 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/12/07/business/economy/steel-tariffs-climate-change.html.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 186 (2003), University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Teehankee, Manuel A. J., Trade and Environment Governance at the World Trade Organization Committee on Trade and Environment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020).Google Scholar
Tienhaara, Kyla, The Expropriation of Environmental Governance: Protecting Foreign Investors at the Expense of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Titi, Aikaterini, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titievskaia, Jana, ‘Sustainability Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Review of the European Commission Action Plan’, European Parliamentary Research Service, Briefing, 2021.Google Scholar
Tyagi, Yogesh, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’, 4 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 588 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ‘Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1’, Statistical Papers, ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/77/Ver.2.1, 2015.Google Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ‘New Issues Requiring Guidance in the Central Product Classification (CPC)’, Meeting of the Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications, New York, 19–22 May 2015, ESA/STAT/AC.289/20, 12 May 2015.Google Scholar
UN Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, ‘Provisional Central Product Classification’, Statistical Papers, ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/77, 1991.Google Scholar
UN Economic Commission for Europe, ‘Working Party on Pollution and Energy – Introduction’, https://unece.org/transportvehicle-regulations/working-party-pollution-and-energy-introduction.Google Scholar
UN, ‘2020 United Nations Energy Statistics Yearbook’, 2020, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energystats/pubs/yearbook/2020/04d.pdf.Google Scholar
UN, ‘Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement: Synthesis Report by the Secretariat’, Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, FCCC/PA/CMA/2022/4, 26 October 2022.Google Scholar
UN, ‘Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-Seventh Session, Held in Sharm el-Sheikh from 6 to 20 November 2022’, Decision 1/CP.27, FCCC/CP/2022/10/Add.1, 17 March 2023.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Working Group III, ‘Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Multiple Proceedings and Counterclaims’, Note by the Secretariat, Thirty-ninth Session, New York, 30 March–3 April 2020, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.193, 22 January 2020.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Compendium of International Arrangements on Transfer of Technology: Selected Instruments’, UNCTAD/ITE/IPC/Misc.5, 2001.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘A European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Implications for Developing Countries’, 2021.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Expropriation’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, 2012.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, 2012.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘International Investment Agreements Navigator’, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘International Investment Agreements Reform Accelerator’, 2020.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘The International Investment Treaty Regime and Climate Action’, IIA Issues Note: International Investment Agreements, Issue No. 3, 2022.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator’, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement. ‘The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation in Promoting Renewable Energy by 2030’, 2019.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Transfer of Technology’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement, 2001.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Treaty-Based Investor–State Dispute Settlement Cases and Climate Action’, IIA Issues Note: International Investment Agreements, Issue No. 4, 2022.Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Actions on Air Quality: A Global Summary of Policies and Programmes to Reduce Air Pollution’, 2021.Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Regional Trade and Investment Agreements’, 2011.Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Measuring Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals’, 2019.Google Scholar
US International Trade Commission, ‘Renewable Energy and Related Services: Recent Developments’, Investigation No. 332-534, USITC Publication 4421, 2013.Google Scholar
US Trade Representative, ‘2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program’, 2021.Google Scholar
US Trade Representative, ‘Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’, 2020.Google Scholar
US White House, ‘Biden-Harris Administration Releases Inflation Reduction Act Guidebook for Clean Energy and Climate Programs’, 15 December 2022, www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/12/15/biden-harris-administration-releases-inflation-reduction-act-guidebook-for-clean-energy-and-climate-programs/.Google Scholar
US White House, ‘Statement on Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity’, 23 May 2022, www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/23/statement-on-indo-pacific-economic-framework-for-prosperity.Google Scholar
USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the Federal Republic of Germany [C-428-848], 7 December 2020.Google Scholar
USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from Italy [C-475-841], 7 December 2020.Google Scholar
USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China [C-570-980], 9 October 2012.Google Scholar
USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Utility Scale Wind Towers (Wind Towers) from the People’s Republic of China [C-570-982], 17 December 2012.Google Scholar
USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from the Republic of Korea [C-580-866], 16 March 2012.Google Scholar
USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Large Residential Washers from the Republic of Korea [C-580-869], 18 December 2012.Google Scholar
USDOC, ‘Steel and Aluminum U.S.–EU Joint Statement’, 31 October 2021, www.commerce.gov/news/fact-sheets/2021/10/steel-and-aluminum-us-eu-joint-statement.Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina, ‘Beyond Known Worlds: Climate Change Governance by Arbitral Tribunals?’, 48 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1285 (2015).Google Scholar
Veel, Paul-Erik, ‘Carbon Tariffs and the WTO: An Evaluation of Feasible Policies’, 12 Journal of International Economic Law 749 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E., Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Vossenaar, Rene, ‘The APEC List of Environmental Goods: An Analysis of the Outcome & Expected Impact’, ICTSD Issue Paper No. 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Vranes, Erich, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watal, Jayashree and Caminero, Leticia, ‘Least-Developed Countries, Transfer of Technology and the TRIPS Agreement’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2018-01, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Shelagh and van der Burg, Laurie, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: From Rhetoric to Reality’, Working Paper, New Climate Economy, 2015.Google Scholar
Wiesbrock, Anja, ‘An Obligation for Sustainable Procurement? Gauging the Potential Impact of Article 11 TFEU on Public Contracting in the EU’, 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 105 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIPO, ‘Transfer of Technology’, Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, Fourteenth Session (Geneva, 25–29 January 2010), SCP/14/4 REV.2, 26 October 2011.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Koebele, Michael (eds.), WTO – Trade Remedies (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Hestermeyer, Holger P. (eds.), WTO – Trade in Goods (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).World Bank and WTO, ‘The Role of Trade in Developing Countries’ Road to Recovery’, Joint Policy Note, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, ‘State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022’, 2022.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development, ‘Our Common Future’, Report, UN, 1987.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Chair Cites “Chronic” Low Compliance with Subsidy Notification Requirements’, 27 October 2020, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/scm_27oct20_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Climate Change and International Trade’, World Trade Report 2022, 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Government Procurement – Report (2022) of the Committee on Government Procurement, GPA/AR/5, 8 December 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on SCM – Notification Provisions under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures – Background Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SCM/W/546/Rev.13, 31 March 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Existing Definitions of Private Standards in Other International Organizations – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SPS/GEN/1334/Rev.1, 5 August 2014.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Private Industry Standards – Communication from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, G/SPS/GEN/766, 28 February 2007.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Report of the Co-Stewards of the Private Standards E-Working Group to the March 2015 Meeting of the SPS Committee on Action 1 (G/SPS/55) – Submission by the Co-Stewards of the E-Working Group, G/SPS/W/283, 17 March 2015.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Review of the Operation and Implementation of the SPS Agreement – Report adopted by the Committee on 14 July 2017, G/SPS/62, 25 July 2017.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Summary of the Meeting Held on 29–30 June 2005 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SPS/R/37/Rev.1, 18 August 2005.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Actions to Increase Participation of Developing Country Members in the Work of Relevant International Standard Setting Organizations – Information from International Organizations – Report of the Director-General, G/TBT/W/172, 27 February 2002.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, G/TBT/10.7/N/146, 8 February 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Japan and the Republic of Singapore, G/TBT/10.7/N/45, 17 July 2003.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – The European Communities and Switzerland – Notification, G/TBT/10.7/N/44, 29 January 2003.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Japan and European Community – Telecommunications […] Products and Medicinal Products, G/TBT/10.7/N/37, 31 May 2002.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Ukraine, G/TBT/10.7/N/147, 23 February 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Ukraine, G/TBT/10.7/N/144, 30 March 2017.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Colombia – Proposed Modifications to Resolutions 910/2008 and 2604/2009 on Pollutant Emissions from Heavy Vehicles with Diesel Engines – (G/TBT/N/COL/185 and G/TBT/N/COL/186) – Statement by Mexico to the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade – 6–7 March 2013, G/TBT/W/362, 21 March 2013.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade since 1 January 1995 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/TBT/1/Rev.14, 24 September 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – European Union – Amendments to the Directive 2009/28/EC, Renewable Energy Directive – Statement by the European Union to the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade – 21 and 22 March 2018, G/TBT/W/474, 17 April 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – European Union – Draft Commission Regulation Laying Down Eco-Design Requirements for Electronic Displays Pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Amending Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1275/2008 […] – 6 and 7 March 2019, G/TBT/W/606, 22 March 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – European Union – Draft Commission Regulation Laying Down Eco-Design Requirements for Electronic Displays Pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Amending Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1275/2008 […] – 20 and 21 June 2019, G/TBT/W/672, 23 July 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Fifth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4, G/TBT/26, 13 November 2009.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Fourth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4, G/TBT/19, 14 November 2006.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 1 July 2004 – Chairperson: Mr. Sudhakar Dalela (India) – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/33, 31 August 2004.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 10–11 November 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/55, 9 February 2012.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 12–15 November 2019 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/79, 30 January 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 13–14 May 2020 – Written Procedure on Specific Trade Concerns – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/81, 26 June 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 13–15 June 2012 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/57, 18 September 2012.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 15–16 June 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/54, 20 September 2011.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 15–16 June 2016 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/69, 22 September 2016.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 16–17 June 2005 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/36, 4 August 2005.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 17, 19 and 20 June 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/60, 23 September 2013.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 18–19 March 2009 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/47, 5 June 2009.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 18–19 March 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/65, 28 May 2015.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 2 November 2005 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/37, 22 December 2005.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 20–21 June 2019 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/78, 23 September 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 21–22 March 2018 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/74, 22 May 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 23–24 June 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/51, 1 October 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 24–25 March 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/50, 28 May 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 24–25 March 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/53, 26 May 2011.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 24–26 February 2021 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/83, 21 April 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 25–26 June 2009 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/48, 29 September 2009.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 29–30 March 2017 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/71, 2 June 2017.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 30–31 October 2013 – Chairperson: Mr. Jingo Kikukawa – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/61, 5 February 2014.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 4–6 November 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/67, 3 February 2016.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 5–6 November 2014 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/TBT/M/64/Rev.1, 6 March 2015.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 5 July 2007 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/42, 6 August 2007.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 6–7 March 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/59, 8 May 2013.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 6–7 March 2019 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/77, 15 May 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 8–9 November 2017 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/73, 6 March 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 9–10 March 2016 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/68, 12 May 2016.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 9 November 2006 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/40, 26 January 2007.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Ninth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4, G/TBT/46, 17 November 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Notification – Switzerland – Diesel Passenger Cars, G/TBT/N/CHE/39, 5 March 2004.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Notification – Switzerland – Diesel Passenger Cars, G/TBT/N/CHE/67, 11 August 2006.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Second Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, G/TBT/9, 13 November 2000.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Sixth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under article 15.4, G/TBT/32, 29 November 2012.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on TBT – Twenty-Fifth Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/44, 19 February 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Development – Special and Differential Treatment Provisions in WTO Agreements and Decisions – Note by the Secretariat, WT/COMTD/W/271, 16 March 2023.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Committee on TBT – Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade with Regard to Labelling Requirements, Voluntary Standards, and Processes and Production Methods Unrelated to Product Characteristics – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/10, G/TBT/W/11, 29 August 1995.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Communication on Trade and Environmental Sustainability – Communication from Australia; Canada; Chad; Chile; Costa Rica; EU; The Gambia; Fiji; Iceland; Japan; Korea; […]; and the UK, WT/CTE/W/249, 17 November 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Environment and Services, WT/CTE/W/9, 8 June 1995.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Environmental (Sustainability) Assessments of Trade Liberalization Agreements at the National Level – Item 2 of the Work Programme – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/171, 20 October 2000.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Internationally Agreed Definitions of Environmental Labelling within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Related Work – Communication from the ISO, WT/CTE/W/114, 31 May 1999.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 24–25 November 1997 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/16, 19 December 1997.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 30 June 2014 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/57, 30 September 2014.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 29 September 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/50, 2 November 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 14 November 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/53, 27 January 2012.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 5 June 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/55, 16 August 2013.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 20 June 2017 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/63, 27 September 2017.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Manuel A. J. Teehankee, to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/TE/20, 21 April 2011.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Manuel A. J. Teehankee, to the Trade Negotiations Committee for the Purpose of the TNC Stocktaking Exercise, TN/TE/19, 22 March 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Statement by the Chairperson of the Special Session of the Committee on Trade and Environment to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/TE/2, 4 July 2002.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – WTO Negotiations on Environmental Goods and Services – Addressing the Development Dimension for a ‘Triple-Win’ Outcome – Communication from China and India, TN/TE/W/79, 15 April 2011.Google Scholar
WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Taxes and Charges for Environmental Purposes – Border Tax Adjustment – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/47, 2 May 1997.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for Trade in Goods – Minutes of the Meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods – 7 and 8 July 2022, G/C/M/143, 6 October 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Background Note on Environmental Services – Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/320, 20 August 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Energy Services – Background Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/52, 9 September 1998.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Energy Services – Background Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/311, 12 January 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Chile, Mexico, New Zealand and Panama – Exploratory Discussions on Market Access, JOB/SERV/282, 13 June 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Australia, Canada, the EU, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the UK – Exploratory Discussions on Market Access: Environmental Services – Revision, JOB/SERV/299/Rev.4, 21 July 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Annual Report on Notifications and Other Information Flows – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, IP/C/W/687/Rev.1, 7 March 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Decision of the Council for TRIPS of 19 February 2003, IP/C/28, 20 February 2003.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – EU – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.5, 6 February 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – New Zealand – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.7, 4 February 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Australia – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.3, 10 October 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Canada – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.4, 10 October 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Norway – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.6, 10 October 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Switzerland, IP/C/W/656, 27 September 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Eliminating Trade Barriers on Environmental Goods and Services’, www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_neg_serv_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Environmental Database’, https://edb.wto.org.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA)’, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/ega_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, European Union – Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels – Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Indonesia, WT/DS593/9, 24 March 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, European Union and Certain Member States – Certain Measures on the Importation and Marketing of Biodiesel and Measures Supporting the Biodiesel Industry – Request for Consultations by Argentina, WT/DS459/1, G/L/1027, G/SCM/D97/1, G/TRIMS/D/36, G/TBT/D/44, 23 May 2013.Google Scholar
WTO, European Union and Certain Member States – Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels – Request for Consultations by Malaysia, WT/DS600/1, G/L/1384, G/TBT/D/54, G/SCM/D131/1, 19 January 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Exploring the Links between Subsidies, Trade and the WTO’, World Trade Report 2006, 2006.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘The Future of Services Trade’, World Trade Report 2019, 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – 28 February and 1 March 2019 – The Continued Relevance of Special and Differential Treatment in Favour of Developing Members to Promote Development and Ensure Inclusiveness – Communication from China, India, South Africa and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, […] and Pakistan – Revision, WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2, 4 March 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – 7 May 2019 – Pursuing the Development Dimension in WTO Rule-Making Efforts – Communication from Norway; Canada; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Mexico; New Zealand; Singapore and Switzerland – Revision, WT/GC/W/770/Rev.3, 8 May 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – 9–11 December 2019 – Draft General Council Decision – Procedures to Strengthen the Negotiating Function of the WTO – Decision of X Date – Revision, WT/GC/W/764/Rev.1, 25 November 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Advancing Sustainability Goals through Trade Rules to Level the Playing Field – Draft Ministerial Decision, WT/GC/W/814, 17 December 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – An Undifferentiated WTO: Self-Declared Development Status Risks Institutional Irrelevance – Communication from the United States, WT/GC/W/757, 16 January 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – China’s Proposal on WTO Reform – Communication from China, WT/GC/W/773, 13 May 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Committee on SCM – Committee on Trade and Development – A Case for Rebalancing the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM) – Policy Space to Promote Industrialisation in Developing Countries – Communication from the African Group (Angola; Benin; […]; Uganda; Zambia and Zimbabwe), WT/GC/W/880, G/SCM/W/589, WT/COMTD/W/274, 26 May 2023.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Council for Trade in Goods – Procedures to Enhance Transparency and Strengthen Notification Requirements under WTO Agreements – Communication from Argentina, Costa Rica, the EU, Japan, and the United States, JOB/GC/204, JOB/CTG/14, 1 November 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Council for Trade in Goods – Procedures to Enhance Transparency and Improve Compliance with Notification Requirements under WTO Agreements – Communication from Albania; Argentina; Australia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; the EU; […]; and Uruguay – Revision, JOB/GC/204/Rev.12, JOB/CTG/14/Rev.12, 2 November 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Improving the Operation of WTO Bodies to Revitalise the WTO’s Monitoring and Deliberative Function – Communication from Australia; Brunei Darussalam; Canada; Chile; Costa Rica; Guatemala; Iceland; Israel; Japan; Republic of Korea; New Zealand; […]; and the UK, WT/GC/W/877, 4 May 2023.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Ministerial Statement on Fossil Fuel Subsidies – Revision, WT/MIN(21)/9/Rev.2, 10 June 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Minutes of the Meeting – Held in the Centre William Rappard and in Virtual Format on 25–26 July 2022, WT/GC/M/200, 21 October 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Reinforcing the Deliberative Function of the WTO to Respond to Global Trade Policy Challenges – Communication from the EU, WT/GC/W/864, 22 February 2023.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Strengthening and Modernizing the WTO: Discussion Paper – Communication from Canada, JOB/GC/201, 24 September 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Waivers – 1995–2020 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, WT/GC/W/718/Rev.1, 25 January 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – Waivers – 2021 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/GC/W/840, 17 December 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, General Council – WTO Reform: Incremental Changes to Improve the Functioning of the Various WTO Bodies – Communication from India, WT/GC/W/874, 1 May 2023.Google Scholar
WTO, Guide to GATT Law and Practice (Geneva: WTO, 1995), Analytical Index, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Investment Facilitation for Development in the WTO’, January 2023, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/invfac_public_e/factsheet_ifd.pdf.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Lamy Calls for Dialogue on Trade and Energy in the WTO’, 29 April 2013, www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl279_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, Ministerial Conference – [Twelfth Session – Geneva, 30 November – 3 December 2021] – TESSD – Ministerial Statement on Trade and Environmental Sustainability – Revision, WT/MIN(21)/6/Rev.2, 14 December 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, Ministerial Conference – [Twelfth Session – Geneva, 30 November – 3 December 2021] – Informal Dialogue on Plastic Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade (IDP) – MC12 Ministerial Statement on Plastic Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade – Revision, WT/MIN(21)/8/Rev.2, 10 December 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, Ministerial Conference – Tenth Session – Nairobi, 15–18 December 2015 – Ministerial Declaration on the Expansion of Trade in Information Technology Products – Nairobi, 16 December 2015, WT/MIN(15)/25, 16 December 2015.Google Scholar
WTO, Ministerial Conference – Twelfth Session – Geneva, 12–15 June 2022 – Ministerial Decision on the TRIPS Agreement – Adopted on 17 June 2022, WT/MIN(22)/30, WT/L/1141, 22 June 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Ministerial Conference, Singapore – Ministerial Declaration on Trade in Information Technology Products – Singapore, 13 December 1996, WT/MIN(96)/16, 13 December 1996.Google Scholar
WTO, Negotiating Group on Rules – Report by the Chairman, H. E. Mr Wayne McCook to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/RL/28, 29 November 2017.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Negotiations on Trade and the Environment’, www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_negotiations_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, Report (1996) of the Committee on Trade and Environment, WT/CTE/1, 12 November 1996.Google Scholar
WTO, Report (2008) of the Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology to the General Council, WT/WGTTT/10, 11 December 2008.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘SPS & TBT Platform’, https://eping.wto.org.Google Scholar
WTO, Structured Discussions on Investment Facilitation – Communication from Brazil, INF/IFD/W/1, 26 March 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Subsidies Committee Members Again Cite Concerns on Lack of Transparency’, 30 April 2019, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news19_e/scm_30apr19_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussion: An Overview in Three Pages’, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tessd_e/tessd_overview_in_three_pages.pdf.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Trade in Natural Resources’, World Trade Report 2010, 2010.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘Trade in Services: The Most Dynamic Segment of International Trade’, 2015, www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/20y_e/services_brochure2015_e.pdf.Google Scholar
WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Australia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/396/Rev.1, 29 July 2020.Google Scholar
WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Bangladesh – Revision, WT/TPR/S/385/Rev.1, 21 May 2019.Google Scholar
WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – China – Revision, WT/TPR/S/375/Rev.1, 14 September 2018.Google Scholar
WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Georgia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/328/Rev.1, 18 March 2016.Google Scholar
WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Indonesia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/401/Rev.1, 5 February 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – The State of Kuwait – Revision, WT/TPR/S/258/Rev.1, 28 February 2012.Google Scholar
WTO, Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions – Meeting Held on 19 and 20 July 2022 – Informal Summary by the Coordinators, INF/TE/SSD/R/12, 20 September 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions (TESSD) – Experiences in the Promotion and Facilitation of Environmental Goods and Services – Note by the Secretariat, INF/TE/SSD/W/18, 23 March 2022.Google Scholar
WTO, Trade in Services – Lao PDR – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/150, 22 April 2013.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment – Communication from UNCTAD – The Draft United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, WT/WGTI/W/52, 21 August 1998.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology – A Taxonomy on Country Experiences on International Technology Transfers – Note by the Secretariat, WT/WGTTT/W/3, 11 November 2002.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology – Provisions Relating to Transfer of Technology in WTO Agreements – Communication from Cuba, Egypt, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Mauritius, Pakistan and Zimbabwe – Revision, WT/WGTTT/3/Rev.1, 21 October 2002.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology – Report 2021 of the Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology to the General Council, WT/WGTTT/23, 5 November 2021.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Party on Domestic Regulation – Communication from Switzerland – Proposal for Disciplines on Technical Standards in Services, S/WPDR/W/32/Rev.1, 28 October 2005.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Party on Domestic Regulation – Disciplines on Domestic Regulation Pursuant to GATS Article VI:4 – Chairman’s Progress Report, S/WPDR/W/45, 14 April 2011.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Party on Domestic Regulation – Technical Standards in Services – Note by the Secretariat, S/WPDR/W/49, 13 September 2012.Google Scholar
WTO, Working Party on Professional Services – The Relevance of the Disciplines of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and on Import Licensing Procedures to Article VI.4 of the General Agreement on Trade in Services – Note by the Secretariat, S/WPPS/W/9, 11 September 1996.Google Scholar
WTO, ‘WTO Members Engage in Exploratory Talks on Market Access for Environmental Services’, 30 September 2019, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news19_e/serv_30sep19_e.htm.Google Scholar
Yada, Jurei et al., ‘Harmonization of Product Energy Efficiency Standards and Free Trade Agreements: The Role of International Cooperation’, European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Summer Study Proceedings, 2017, www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Summer_Studies/2017/2-policy-governance-design-implementation-and-evaluation-challenges/harmonization-of-product-energy-efficiency-standards-and-free-trade-agreements-the-role-of-international-cooperation/.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Shunta, ‘Greening Regional Trade Agreements on Investment’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2020/03, 2020.Google Scholar
Yu, Dayong, ‘The Harmonized System – Amendments and Their Impact on WTO Members’ Schedules’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2008-02, 2008.Google Scholar
Zachmann, Georg and McWilliams, Ben, ‘A European Carbon Border Tax: Much Pain, Little Gain’, Policy Contribution No. 5, Bruegel, 2020.Google Scholar
Zee, Eva van der, ‘Disciplining Private Standards under the SPS and TBT Agreement: A Plea for Market-State Procedural Guidelines’, 52 Journal of World Trade 393 (2018).Google Scholar
Zhu, Ying, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and International Investment Law: Tension and Reconciliation’, 2017 Nordic Journal of Commercial Law 90 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhuang, Wei, Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change: Interpreting the TRIPS Agreement for Environmentally Sound Technologies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar