Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-frvt8 Total loading time: 0.796 Render date: 2022-10-05T12:44:21.360Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

Stefano Bacin
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Oliver Sensen
Affiliation:
Tulane University, Louisiana
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenwall, Gottfried 1763. Ius Naturae, fifth edition. Göttingen: BossigelGoogle Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried Forthcoming. Natural Law, ed. Kleingeld, Pauline, trans. Vermeulen, Corinna, with an introduction by Guyer, Paul. London: Bloomsbury PressGoogle Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried and Pütter, Johann Stephan 1995. Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa Iuris Naturae), ed. Schröder, Jan. Frankfurt am Main: Insel VerlagGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry 2013. “Autonomy in Kant and German Idealism,” in Sensen 2013a, 129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2012. Kant’s Elliptical Path. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2013. “Vindicating Autonomy,” in Sensen 2013a, 53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2006. Il senso dell’etica: Kant e la costruzione di una teoria morale. Bologna: il MulinoGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2013. “Legge e obbligatorietà: La struttura dell’idea di autolegislazione morale in Kant,” Studi Kantiani 26, 5570Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2015. “Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral Philosophy,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2017. “Rationalism and Perfectionism,” in The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Golob, Sacha and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2018a. “Kant and Feder on the Will, Happiness, and the Aim of Moral Philosophy,” in Dyck and Wunderlich 2018, 232–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2018b. “Moral Realism by Other Means: The Hybrid Nature of Kant’s Practical Rationalism,” in Moral Realism or Anti-Realism in Kant, ed. Schmidt, Elke and dos Santos, Robinson. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 153176Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, Ruffing, Margit (eds.) 2013. Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin and Boston: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean 1718. “Jugement d’un anonyme sur l’original de cet abrégé,” in Les Devoirs de l’Homme et du Citoien, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel 4th edn. Amsterdam: De Coup and Kuyper, II, 429495. English translation: Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, eds. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003, 267–305.Google Scholar
Bartuschat, Wolfgang 2004. “Kant über Grundsatz und Grundsätze in der Moral,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 12, 283298Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 1740. Ethica Philosophica. Halle: Hemmerde (second edition 1751, third edition 1763) [Second and third editions reprinted in AA 27:737–869, 27:873–1028]Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 1760. Initia Philosophiae Practicae Primae. Halle: Hemmerde [Reprint in AA 19:7–91]Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard 2010. Immanuel Kant – was bleibt? Hamburg: MeinerGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim 2010. Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2007. “Kant’s Concepts of Justification,” Noûs 41, 3363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1706. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation, in The Works of Samuel Clarke, vol. 2. London: Knapton 1738Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1756. Abhandlung von dem Daseyn und den Eigenschaften Gottes, von den Verbindlichkeiten der Natürlichen Religion, und der Wahrheit und Gewißheit der Christlichen Offenbarung. Braunschweig–Hildesheim: SchröderGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1991. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, in British Moralists 1650–1800, ed. Raphael, D. D.. Oxford University Press, 190225Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) 2015. Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin and Boston: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2014. Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. 2003. “Stoic Autonomy,” Social Philosophy and Policy 20: 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Konrad 2001. “‘Depositum.’ Zur logischen Struktur eines kantischen Beispiels für moralisches Argumentieren,” in Gerhardt et al. 2001, 116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusius, Christian August 1744. Anweisung vernünftig zu leben, Darinnen nach Erklärung der Natur des menschlichen Willens die natürlichen Pflichten und allgemeinen Klugheitslehren im richtigen Zusammenhange vorgetragen werden. Leipzig: Gleditsch, third edition 1767 [Reprint: ed. Giorgio Tonelli. Hildesheim: Olms 1969]Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August 1745. Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzet werden. Leipzig: Gleditsch [Reprint: ed. Giorgio Tonelli. Hildesheim: Olms 1969]Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph 1731. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality; with, A Treatise of Freewill, ed. Hutton, Sarah. Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara (ed.) 2010. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver (eds.) 2015. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey 2012. “Chimerical Ethics and Flattering Moralists: Baumgarten’s Influence on Kant’s Moral Theory in the Observations and Remarks,” in Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide, ed. Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard. Cambridge University Press, 3856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk (eds.) 2018. Kant and His German Contemporaries. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August 1776. Allgemeine Theorie des Denkens und Empfindens. Berlin: Voß [Reprint: Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum 1972]Google Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August 1781. Sittenlehre der Vernunft: Zum Gebrauche seiner Vorlesungen. Berlin: Nicolai [Reprint: Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum 1971]Google Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August 1788. Neue Vermischte Schriften. Halle: GebauerGoogle Scholar
Epictetus, , 1925–1928. The Discourses as Reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments, trans. Oldfather, W.A., 2 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Esser, Andrea Marlen 2016. “Applying the Concept of the Good: The Final End and the Highest Good in Kant’s Third Critique,” in The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Höwing, Thomas. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 245262Google Scholar
Feil, Ernst 1987. Antithetik neuzeitlicher Vernunft: “Autonomie-Heteronomie” und “rational-irrational.” Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, II 1780. Ueber die deutsche Litteratur, die Mängel die man ihr vorwerfen kann, die Ursachen derselben und die Mittel sie zu verbessern, trans. von Dohm, Christian Konrad Wilhelm. Berlin: DeckerGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick 2015. “Herder: Religion and Moral Motivation,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 34–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garve, Christian 1787. Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten [1783]. Neue verbesserte und mit einigen Anmerkungen vermehrte Ausgabe, second edition, 3 vols. Breslau: Korn [Reprint: ed. Kurt Wölfel, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms 1986]Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.) 2001. Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin and New York: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Michael 1998. “On the Alleged Incompatibility between Sentimentalism and Moral Confidence,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15, 411440Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah 2015. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Goy, Ina 2007. “Immanuel Kant über das moralische Gefühl der Achtung,” Zeit-schrift für philosophische Forschung 61, 337360Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2007. “Perfection, Autonomy, and Heautonomy: The Path of Reason from Wolff to Kant,” in Wolff und die europäische Aufklärung: Akten des 1. Internationalen Wolff-Kongresses, ed. Stolzenberg, Jürgen. Hildesheim: Olms, 299322Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2011. “Kantian Perfectionism,” in Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, ed. Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian. Cambridge University Press, 194214Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2012a. “Freedom as the Foundation of Morality: Kant’s Early Efforts,” in Shell and Velkley 2012, 77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2012b. “Review of Delfosse, Heinrich P., Norbert Hinske, Gianluca Sadun Bordoni, Einleitung des ‘Naturrechts Feyerabend’” (2010), Ratio Juris 25, 110116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1957/58. “Hutcheson und Kant,” Kant-Studien 49, 4969Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1963. “Über Kants früheste Ethik,” Kant-Studien 54, 404431. Translation: “Concerning Kant’s Earliest Ethics,” in Shell and Velkley 2012, 13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1989. “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique,” in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. Förster, Eckart. Stanford University Press, 2946Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1992. “The Moral Image of the World,” in Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford University Press, 328Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1994. “Ethics of Autonomy,” in The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 89121Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. 1991. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E., 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Philipp-Alexander 2012. Kants Einleitung in die Rechtslehre von 1784: Immanuel Kants Rechtsbegriff in der Moralvorlesung “Mrongovius II” und der Naturrechtsvorlesung “Feyerabend” von 1784 sowie in der “Metaphysik der Sitten” von 1797. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag GöttingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J. 2004. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Dieter 2004. “Wolffs Begriff der natürlichen Verbindlichkeit als Bindeglied zwischen empirischer Psychologie und Moralphilosophie,” in Christian Wolffs Psychologie: Systematische und historische Untersuchungen, ed. Rudolph, Oliver-Pierre and Goubet, Jean-François. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 145169Google Scholar
Hüning, Dieter 2015. “Gesetz und Verbindlichkeit. Zur Begründung der praktischen Philosophie bei Samuel Pufendorf und Christian Wolff,” in Das Band der Gesellschaft. Verbindlichkeitsdiskurse im 18: Jahrhundert, ed. Bunke, Simon, Mihaylova, Katerina and Ringkamp, Daniela. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 3757Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis 1725. Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, ed. Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis 1728. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections: With Illustrations on the Moral Sense, ed. Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002Google Scholar
Jachmann, Reinhold Bernhard 1993. “Immanuel Kant geschildert in Briefen an einen Freund,” in Immanuel Kant, ed. Gross, Felix and Malter, Rudolf. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 103187Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick 2004. “Self-Legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86, 257306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick 2005. “Interpreting Kant’s Theory of Divine Commands,” Kantian Review 9, 128149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kames, Home, Henry, Lord 1751. Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion, ed. Catherine Moran, Mary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. 2005Google Scholar
Kames, Home, Henry, Lord 1768. Versuch über die ersten Gründe der Sittlichkeit und der natürlichen Religion in zween Theilen, trans. Rautenberg, Christian Günter. Braunschweig: MeyerGoogle Scholar
Keller, Pierre 1998. Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel J. 2002. Kant’s Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 1993. “The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant,” Philosophical Forum 25, 134150Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 1998. “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36, 7797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2010. “Moral Consciousness and the ‘Fact of Reason,’” in Reath and Timmermann 2010, 55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2017. “Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law,” Kant-Studien 108, 89115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2018. “The Principle of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory: Its Rise and Fall,” in Kant on Persons and Agency, ed. Watkins, Eric. Cambridge University Press, 6179Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline and Willaschek, Marcus. Unpublished. “Autonomy without Paradox: Kant, Self-Legislation, and the Moral Law”Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2011. “Johann Georg Sulzers ‘vermischte Sittenlehre.’ Ein Beitrag zur Vorgeschichte und Problemstellung von Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Johann Georg Sulzer (1720–1779): Aufklärer zwischen Christian Wolff und David Hume, ed. Grunert, Frank and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin: de Gruyter, 309322Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2013. “Kants Erörterung der ‘libertas indifferentiae’ in der Metaphysik der Sitten und ihre philosophische Bedeutung,” in Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus / International Yearbook of German Idealism, 9/2011, ed. Rush, Fred and Stolzenberg, Jürgen. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 2250Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2015a. “Freiheit, Recht und Selbsterhaltung. Zur philosophischen Bedeutung von Kants Begriff der Verbindlichkeit,” in Normativität des Lebens – Normativität der Vernunft?, ed. Rothhaar, Markus and Hähnel, Martin. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 95116Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2015b. “Knowing, Feeling, Desiring – Self-Possession. Reflections on the Connection between the Faculties in Kant’s Doctrine of the Categorical Imperative,” in Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen, ed. Dörflinger, Bernd, La Rocca, Claudio, Louden, Robert, and de Azevedo-Marques, Ubirajara Rancan. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 143161Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2016. “Sutor, Johann Paul Junior (1752–82),” in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth Century German Philosophers, ed. Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London, New York: Bloomsbury, 767768Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2018. “The Antithetic between Freedom and Natural Necessity: Garve’s Problem and Kant’s Solution,” in Dyck and Wunderlich 2018, 250–264.Google Scholar
König, Peter 1994. Autonomie und Autokratie: Über Kant’s Metaphysik der Sitten. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkman, Petter 2003. “Voluntarism and Moral Obligation: Barbeyrac’s Defence of Pufendorf Revisited,” in Early Modern Natural Law Theories, ed. Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schröder, Peter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 195225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1986. “Skepticism about Practical Reason,” Journal of Philosophy 83, 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauß, Wilhelm 1926. Untersuchungen zu Kants moralphilosophischen Vorlesungen. PhD dissertation, TübingenGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2004. “Einleitung,” in Kant, Immanuel. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, Werner. Berlin: de Gruyter, viixxxvCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2015. “Collins: Kant’s Proto-Critical Position,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulenkampff, Jens 2004. “Moralisches Gefühl oder moral sense – wie berechtigt ist Kants Kritik?Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 12, 234251Google Scholar
Langton, Rae 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Gerhard 1979. “Einleitung,” in AA 27:10371068Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1706. “Monita quaedam ad Samuelis Pufendorfii Principia,” in Opera Omnia, ed. Dutens, Louis. Genève: Fratres de Tournes 1768, vol. 4. III, 275–28. Translation in Leibniz. Political Writings, ed. Patrick Riley. Cambridge University Press 1972, 64–75Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1710. Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal, in Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, ed. Gerhardt, Carl Immanuel. Berlin: Weidman 1875–90, vol. VI [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1978]Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1860. Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff, ed. Gerhardt, Carl Immanuel. Halle: Schmidt [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1971]Google Scholar
Luther, Martin 1883. Dr. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe [Weimarer Ausgabe]. Weimar: Böhlau 18832009Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas 1680. Traité de la nature et de la grâce. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas 1684. Traité de morale: Réimprimé d’après l’édition de 1707, avec les variantes des éditions de 1684 et 1697. Paris: Thorin 1882Google Scholar
Malter, Rudolf (ed.) 1986. Kants Briefwechsel. Hamburg: MeinerGoogle Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich 1764. Allgemeine practische Weltwisheit, Halle: Hemmerde [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 2008]Google Scholar
Meiners, Christoph 1801. Allgemeine kritische Geschichte der Ethik oder Lebens-Wissenschaft. Zweyter Theil. Göttingen: DieterichGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Heinrich Adam 1737. Philosophisches Lexicon aus Christian Wolffs sämtlichen deutschen Schriften. Bayreuth: VierlingGoogle Scholar
Menzer, Paul (ed.) 1924. Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik. Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf HeiseGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Georg 2005. “‘Moral Sense’ – Zur Geschichte einer Hypothese und ihrer Kritik bei Adam Smith,” in Adam Smith als Moralphilosoph, ed. Fricke, Christel and Schütt, Hans-Peter. Berlin: de Gruyter, 304330Google Scholar
Moran, Richard 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate A. 2012. Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington: Catholic University of America PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2003. “Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplement 77, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2013. “Postscript: Heteronomy as the Clue to Kantian Autonomy,” in Kant on Moral Autonomy, ed. Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge University Press, 282288Google Scholar
Park, Chan-Goo 1995. Das moralische Gefühl in der britischen moral-sense-Schule und bei Kant. Tübingen: unpublished dissertationGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence R. 2014. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Patzig, Günther 1985. “Principium diiudicationis” und “Principium executionis,” in Handlungstheorie und Transzendentalphilosophie, ed. Prauss, Gerold. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 204218Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 2002. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin 2017. Kant’s Theory of Normativity. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel 1991. On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, trans. Silverthorne, Michael, ed. Tully, James. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel 2003. The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature (1673), trans. Andrew Tooke (1691), ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Indianapolis: Liberty FundGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick 2010. “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge University Press, 290309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick 2015. “Did Kant Justify the French Revolution Ex Post Facto?,” in Clewis 2015, 327–347Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 2005. “The Myth of Instrumental Rationality,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1, 128Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 1994. “Legislating the Moral Law,” Noûs 28, 435464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2010. “Formal Principles and the Form of a Law,” in Reath and Timmermann 2010, 31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2013a. “The Ground of Practical Laws,” in Bacin et al. 2013, vol. 3, 571–581Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2013b. “Kant’s Conception of Autonomy of the Will,” in Sensen 2013a, 32–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2015. “Did Kant Hold That Rational Volition Is Sub Ratione Boni?,” in Reason, Value, and Respect: Kantian Themes from the Philosophy of Thomas E. Hill, Jr., ed. Johnson, Robert and Timmons, Mark. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (eds.) 2010. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus 2001. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Baum, Manfred. Hamburg: MeinerGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick 1986. The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1762. Émile, ou de l’éducation, in Oeuvres complètes, ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel, Paris: Gallimard 1969, vol. 4Google Scholar
Schadow, Steffi 2013. Achtung für das Gesetz. Moral und Motivation bei Kant. Berlin and Boston: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Schmucker, Josef 1961. Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflektionen. Meisenheim: HainGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1996. “Barbeyrac and Leibniz on Pufendorf,” in Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung: Werk und Einfluss eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 181189Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1997. “Introduction,” to Kant: Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge University Press, xiiixxviiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (ed.) 2003. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 2009. “Kant against the ‘Spurious Principles of Morality,’” in Timmermann 2009a, 140–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 2010. “Voluntarism and the Foundations of Ethics,’” in Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 202221Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2005. Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie. Berlin and New York: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 1999. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-HolzboogGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 2000. “Die Vorlesungsnachschriften zu Kants praktischer Philosophie in der Akademie-Ausgabe,” in Zustand und Zukunft der Akademie-Ausgabe von Immanuel Kants Gesammelten Schriften (Kant-Studien 91, Sonderheft), ed. Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Berlin: de Gruyter, 178188Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 2011. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten – Ein Intellektuelles Porträt: Studien Zur Metaphysik und Ethik von Kants Leitautor. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-HolzboogGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2012. “The Role of Feelings in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Studi Kantiani 25, 4558Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (ed.) 2013a. Kant on Moral Autonomy. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2013b. “The Moral Importance of Autonomy,” in Sensen 2013a, 262–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2013c. “Kant’s Constructivism,” in Constructivism in Ethics, ed. Bagnoli, Carla. Cambridge University Press, 6381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2015a. “Moral Obligation and Free Will,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 138–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2015b. “Autonomie,” in Kant-Lexikon, ed. Willaschek, Marcus et al. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, vol. 1: 203206Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2015c. “The Supreme Principle of Morality,” in Clewis 2015, 179–199Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, Russ 2003. Moral Realism. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan 2009. Kant and the Limits of Autonomy. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) 2012. Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner 1993. Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Berlin: AkademieCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner 1995. “Kant als akademischer Lehrer,” in Königsberg und Riga, ed. Ischreyt, Heinz. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 5168Google Scholar
Stark, Werner 1999. “Zu Kant’s Moralkolleg der 1770er Jahre,” in Aufklärung und Interpretation, ed. Klemme, Heiner F., Ludwig, Bernd, Pauen, Michael, and Stark, Werner. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 73104Google Scholar
Stark, Werner 2004. “Nachwort,” in Immanuel Kant, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, Werner. Berlin: de Gruyter, 371407Google Scholar
Stäudlin, Carl Friedrich 1822. Geschichte der Moralphilosophie. Hannover: HelwingGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert 2012. Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip 2013. “Morality and Autonomy,” in Sensen 2013a, 246–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulzer, Johann Georg 1773. Vermischte philosophische Schriften: Aus den Jahrbüchern der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin gesammelt. Leipzig: Weidmann and ReichGoogle Scholar
Sutor, Johann Paul 1774. Allgemeine practische Weltweisheit: Ein Versuch für die Philosophie in Bayern. Jena: FickelscheerGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Oliver 2008. “Ethica Deceptrix: The Significance of Baumgarten’s Notion of a Chimerical Ethics for the Development of Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” in Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Rohden, Valerio et al. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 451462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2007. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (ed.) 2009a. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2009b. “Acting from Duty: Inclination, Reason and Moral Worth,” in Timmermann 2009a, 45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2013. “Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant’s Ethical Theory,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95, 3664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2015: “Mrongovius II: A Supplement to the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 68–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton 2006. “Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws,” Philosophical Topics 31, 371407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio 1967. Kant und die antiken Skeptiker, in Studien zu Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Hildesheim: Olms, 93123Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur 1922. Immanuel Kants Bücher: Mit einer getreuen Nachbildung des bisher einzigen bekannten Abzuges des Versteigerungskataloges der Bibliothek Kants. Berlin: BreslauerGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2014. “What Is, for Kant, a Law of Nature?,” Kant-Studien 105, 271290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric and Willaschek, Marcus 2017. “Kant’s Account of Cognition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55, 83112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus 1997. “Why the ‘Doctrine of Right’ Does Not Belong in the Metaphysics of Morals,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5, 205227Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1703. Philosophia practica universalis, mathematica methodo conscripta. Leipzig: GötzeGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1713. Vernünftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkäntniß der Wahrheit, 14th edition. Halle: Renger 1754 [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1978]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1718. Ratio praelectionum Wolfianarum in Mathesin et Philosophiam universam. Halle: Renger 1735 [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1972]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1719. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt, 11th edition. Halle: Renger 1751 [Reprint: ed. Charles A. Corr. Hildesheim: Olms 1983]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1720. Vernünfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen (Deutsche Ethik), fourth edition. Frankfurt, Leipzig: Renger 1733 [Reprint: ed. H. W. Arndt, Hildesheim: Olms 1996]. Translation of selections in Schneewind 2003, 333–350Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1726. Ausführliche Nachricht von seinen eigenen Schriften, die er in deutscher Sprache von den verschiedenen Theilen der Weltweißheit herausgegeben, second edition. Frankfurt am Mayn: Hort 1733 [Reprint: Hildesheim–New York: Olms 1973]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1728. Discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen, ed. Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog 1996Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1738–39. Philosophia practica universalis, methodo scientifica pertractata, Pars prior, theoriam complectens, qua omnis actionum humanarum differentia, omnisque juris ac obligationum omnium, principia, a priori demonstrantur. Frankfurt, Leipzig: Renger [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1971–79]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1750. Philosophia moralis sive Ethica, methodo scientifica pertractata. Pars prima. Halle: Renger [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1970]Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2002. “The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy,” in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark. Oxford University Press, 122Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2008. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2015. “Kant’s History of Ethics,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerth, Julian 2014. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedler, Johann Heinrich (ed.) 1731–54. Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschaften und Künste. Halle and Leipzig: ZedlerGoogle Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa 2006. “Respect for the Law and the Use of Dynamical Terms in Kant’s Theory of Moral Motivation,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88, 3153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöller, Günter 2015. “‘Without Hope and Fear’: Kant’s Naturrecht Feyerabend on Bindingness and Obligation,” in Clewis 2015, 346–361Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Stefano Bacin, Università degli Studi di Milano, Oliver Sensen, Tulane University, Louisiana
  • Book: The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant's Moral Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316863435.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Stefano Bacin, Università degli Studi di Milano, Oliver Sensen, Tulane University, Louisiana
  • Book: The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant's Moral Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316863435.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Stefano Bacin, Università degli Studi di Milano, Oliver Sensen, Tulane University, Louisiana
  • Book: The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant's Moral Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316863435.013
Available formats
×